the gas attack by the assad government and political analyst patrick henningsen explained worry with fangs it's to early to jump the gun and point the finger at the syrian government. of course if we look at the history of this particular region go to a region where the attack is said to take place is very active with the front and they've also been implicated in using makeshift chlorine bombs in aleppo back in march so there is a track record there the evidence unfortunately does not stack up with these present claims of the syrian government perpetrating these attacks or who benefits from a chemical attack in syria while the opposition benefits it's quite obvious the syrian government does not benefit the opposition benefits because this would be the key to unlock the. airstrikes and bombing campaign over syria all of libya. the opposition would like a libyan style coalition with nato in order to force the regime out of power in damascus so they clearly benefit from any reports of a chemical attack in syria. and of course we'll keep you updated on the unfolding story in syria meanw

dot com journalist and filmmaker patrick henningsen puts the anchor is dilemma under scrutiny is going article if you want to check it out online please feel free to do so. next is the big question is the cold war truly dead and buried it seems that space something that moscow and washington can't quite agree on at the moment anyway russia says recent tensions just a temporary glitch but senior u.s. figures including president obama are calling for relations to be paused and reassessed it's widely believed that the catalyst for it all was russia's decision to grant temporary asylum to whistleblower edward snowden now if he's going to shoot you can report remember the meeting between russian and u.s. officials at the state department comes days after president obama canceled the bilateral summit with the russian president is the more and more often we hear about a new cold war between moscow and washington everyone was listening very closely to what officials on both sides were saying and we heard tools differing messages coming from president obama and foreign minister lavrov remember

dot com patrick henningsen posed the dilemma. is articles online now. russia and the u.s. sending rather contradictory signals about their relationship is no sign of cold war thinking according to foreign minister sergey lavrov who is with the russian defense she's meeting their u.s. counterparts president obama very says relations need to be paused and reassessed it's all in the wake of obama's canceling the summit with a bloody me to burgeon off to moscow granted edward snowden temporary asylum here is our correspondent in washington and she can with more remember the meeting between russian and u.s. officials at the state department comes after president obama canceled the bilateral summit with the russian president is the potential of more and more often we hear about a new cold war between moscow and washington so everyone was listening very closely to what officials on both sides were saying then we heard two different messages coming from president obama and four minutes to laugh or off i remember very well what you said when we were saying goodbye he said well i be

dot com filmmaker patrick henningsen shares his thoughts on a dilemma. where do u.s. russia relations stand that's the question the two countries can't seem to find the same answer to moscow says there is no sign of a cold war mentality but washington is calling for diplomatic ties to be paused and reassessed that's in the wake of president obama canceling a meeting with a bloody minded putin after moscow's decision to grant a temporary asylum to fugitive whistleblower edward snowden here's our tease again it's a can with commentary. remember the meeting between russian and u.s. officials at the state department comes days after president obama canceled the bilateral summit with the russian president in september more and more often we hear about a new cold war between moscow and washington so everyone was listening very closely to what officials on both sides were saying and we heard two different messages coming from president obama and for minister lavrov remember very well what you saw when we were saying goodbye he said well i believe that we can make a differenc

and its allies have assumed a sat is to blame but geo political analyst patrick henningsen believes it's the opposition that is profiting. of course we look at the history of this particular region the region where the attack said to take place is very active with the front and they've also been implicated in using makeshift chlorine bombs in aleppo back in march so there is a track record there the evidence unfortunately does not stack up with these present claims of the syrian government perpetrating these attacks who benefits from a chemical attack in syria well the opposition benefits it's quite obvious the syrian government does not benefit the opposition benefits because this will be the key to unlock the. airstrikes and bombing campaign over syria. libya this is a little the opposition would like a libyan style coalition with nato in order to force the regime out of power in damascus so they clearly benefit from any reports of a chemical attack in syria. when international tensions are running high as the pentagon moves naval forces clue. to syria despite a bomb being cautious ove