people in my undisciplined. i was hired at stanford for someone who been working quietly for the tobacco industry. every university has people working quietly for the tobacco industry of litigation and consulting. i'm calling it the biggest breach of academic integrity since the virtually undiagnosed but mark of modern scholarship. >> professor proctor, how strong is the tobacco lobby today is supposed to previously? >> it is a little bit weaker in the united states than it used to be. they saw a $12 billion advertising budget in the united states. that is directed out to smokers through direct mail. though spent hundreds of dollars per smoker on advertising and marketing and promotion because they've got every smoker and a computer less. but their influence in congress is weaker than it used to be. the tobacco institute is to be the most powerful lobby in washington d.c. the tobacco institute was just a cells grow. you could stand on the roof and throw a rock and hit the white

it was undisciplined, but the only way to get relief. >> you did a commercial recently where you gaveear. >> i'm sorry, evander, it's your ear. was it a fun commercial to do? do you believe you are joking about it now? >> it's a big joke now. >> so, when you had to take a drug test, you took out a fake penis? >> yes. >> how does that work? >> it works really effectively. >> when you look back on it, how bad would you say your drug problems were? >> bad enough where i had to go to a center. rehab. >> mr. tyson, you are charged with one count of possession of narcotic drugs. >> how do you keep it under control now? >> i don't have urges now. four months and no urges. i'm winning now. this is the bigger fight. this is the fight i'm taking with open arms. it's an interesting battle. >> mike tyson? >> this is my favorite part coming upright now. >> for a lot of people, the "hangover" move vi was a turning point. having a tiger as a pet, that's true. >> yes, i had a few tigers. >> you can't just throw them in the backseat like a dog. >> it's not true. you could. you could, you could. they d

they were undisciplined and brutalized by their own officers and found themselves in a position where the safest thing do was to shoot everybody. and that escalated to orgies of violence. and earlier, the officers were not in proper control of the middle ranking ones. that played a role as well. the image of the japanese army was correct when it came to the discipline of them and treated the pow's well. but the discipline was left to the desired in the second war. so there was raping and looting on a vast scale. but to be a victim of this is equally unpleasant, but it isn't the same thing as gassing people or shooting people because they don't have the right to live. >> could you come down here, please? thank you. [inaudible conversations] >> i am richard cats. i am fascinated by the degree of misconception in tokyo and washington of the other. i have had talked with leaders of each at the time who thought the united states proposed their plan b for peace and that the united states would accept the document that radified japanese control over china and the united states didn't do this

they were undisciplined, brutalized by their own officers and often found themselves in a position where they thought the safest thing to do is shoot everyone. and that can quickly escalate to these origins of the violence. what we're talking about earlier with his senior officers, i think the middle ranking ones played part of this as well. even though the image of the japanese army is entirely correct and this is a lot to be desired in the second world war. and so we did have these enormous massacres and raping and looting on a vast scale. but it's not quite the same thing. and we don't have the right to leave. [inaudible conversations] >> i am i have had conversations and the japanese leader at the time, they thought that they really believe that the united states are part of the proposal that the u.s. would actually accept this document that ratified the japanese control over china. and of course he does not do this. but the fact that they thought the u.s. might do this is incredible and it's a misperception of everything to a stunning degree. from the american side, from what i can

often couldn't see the difference between civilians and guerrilla fighters and so on, they were undisciplined brutalized by their own officers and often found themselves in a position where the safest thing to do was to shoot everybody. that can quickly escalate to of violence. again what we were talking about earlier with the senior officers not really an proper control of the middle ranking ones i think played a role as well. even though the image of the japanese army were entirely correct when it came to the russo-japanese war when they treated the p.o.w.s very well so that discipline often left a lot to be desired in the second world war. so you did have these enormous massacres and raping and looting on a vast scale and so on but it's not quite the same thing. to be a victim of this is equally oppressive but it's not the same as guessing people are shooting people because they don't have a right to live. >> could you come down here please? thank you. >> hi. i'm richard cas. i am sort of fascinated by the degree of misperception in both tokyo and washington of the other. i've had conversa

that cash has been wasted on undisciplined buy backs.n you see a company do that pass on the stock. time to walk away. here is what you might not know. when it makes it difference particularly during ravaging down turns when most ceos seem frozen and are unwilling to step in and take advantage of the weakness that is market driven and not wyndham driven even though declines are truly not stock specific. he thinks it is his duty to return excess cash to the shareholders. it's their money. i find it refreshing. he doesn't sit on it and do nothing except watch it grow. he is part of a new breed of executives. he wants to fulfill his end of the social compact with shareholders. you stick with him and don't rent wyndham world wide stock, you own it. in return make sure you get your cut of the business. and he grows that business as fast as he can. he is the very model of what they needed to help. understands the stock price going higher is very important and recognize td part of his job to figure out the best way to make that happen. let me t

in short, sthey may have a lot f cash but that cash has been wasted on undisciplined by backs and when you see a company doing that, you should pass on its stock. time to walk away. it's one of the best performing stocks since the s&p 500's bottom in 2009. here's what you might not even know. it's called windham worldwide. holmes buys back stock aggressively and when it makes a difference. particularly during the downturns when most of the ceos are frozen and unable to step in and take advantage of the weakness that's market driven even though the declines are truly not obviously specific. plus it's far more than expected every year because holmes think it's his duty to return his company's excess cash to the shareholders. i find that refreshing. he doesn't sit on it and do nothing except watch it grow at a low return that's slower than watching paint dry. no, he wants to fulfill his end of the social compact with shareholders. you stick with him and you don't rent wyndham worldwide stock. you own it. in return, holmes makes sure you get your cut of the business. and he grows that busi

kids from undisciplined backgrounds. here's my prejudices. i might not.people who have disorganization at homemade organization at school to more than i'm willing to put up with myself. tommy lambro. >> okay, where do we start. [laughter] >> i may be wrong. >> there's so many things i want to say to what you said. first of all, we started this thing. we went at it because i went to sit down with everybody. everybody around the country, on all levels say what works, what works? everyone had a different set of things and everyone was giving opinions. that's great. i want to know what the facts are. what was interesting is no one really had the whole handle on the whole list. yet these are the top people in the field. that was fascinating. why is the assumption that it hasn't been proven yet. the first thing we did was we decided to take all of our funds, research efforts in getting turns and researchers to gather all the information. let's put it on the table. let's get out the research while the subjects. custom size, small schools. performance pay. everyt

i've been there but i think it's coming from undisciplined backgrounds need that discipline.here is my prejudices. i'm laying them out. families that come with disorganization of school need to go to organization of school more than what i'm able -- willing to put up with like nuns mad. >> where do we start? [laughter] no, no there are so many things i want to say about what you said. first of all we started this and we went at it because i went to sit down with everybody. anybody on all levels and just say what works, what works and everyone had a different set of things and everyone was giving opinions. i said that's great. i want to know what the facts are and what was really interesting is that no one really had the whole handle on the whole list and yet these are the top people in the field. that was fascinating. why is there an assumption that it hasn't been proven yet? the first thing we did is we decided to take our research efforts and get interns and get researchers and gather all the information so we could put it all on the table. let's get all the research classr

they were undisciplined, brutalized by their own officers and often found themselves in a position where they thought the safest thing to do is shoot everyone. and that can quickly escalate to these origins of the violence. what we're talking about earlier with his senior officers, i think the middle ranking ones played part of this as well. even though the image of the japanese army is entirely correct and this is a lot to be desired in the second world war. and so we did have these enormous massacres and raping and looting on a vast scale. but it's not quite the same thing. and we don't have the right to leave. [inaudible conversations] >> i am i have had conversations and the japanese leader at the time, they thought that they really believe that the united states are part of the proposal that the u.s. would actually accept this document that ratified the japanese control over china. and of course he does not do this. but the fact that they thought the u.s. might do this is incredible and it's a misperception of everything to a stunning degree. from the american side, from what i can

perspective today, in terms of where we are with fiscal policy, both our long-term policy, which is undisciplined and has excessive spending going out forever, and our short-term policy which is tightening, are both wrong. in fact, what you want to do is precisely opposite. have a little stimulus for the economy to get it going but have long-term reform of the entitlemen entitlements, certainly for the business community they can invest and hire because our policy stance is in good shape. having commentary like that can buy one good analysis, we hope will influence the debate. >> if all goes according to plan what does it look like in 2015? that the hutchins center is part of the debate, giving information in terms of the numbers to a lot of these important issues? or will you help to drive outcomes? >> a little of both. as i say, i don't think you can have good outcomes without good data and analysis. we want to be the go-to place for authoritative thinking. today there's a partisan point of view here and partisan point of view there. then their analysis are influenced by that to get to an outco

their two hundred thousand undisciplined soldiers.they do not need large armies to protect them from other countries, they need a small oorce of about 50,000 tw police and take care of the extremists. if we pull the troops out with is likely to be less violence, in pulling that money from afghanistan who we can pay for military veteran's retirement. oft: a few stats on the size the afghan national army. according to data, as of the beginning of the month, about 187,000. thet: well i think, caller's comments were expressed against the concern that is going on in the country. it is true, the taliban forces note have vowed to necessarily wait out until the end of the deadline, but they are being aggressive in the areas you would expect them to be aggressive and in the south and the east. that is their traditional stronghold areas. with the recent reports now that the members of the afghan national army, and very -- areas,armies reaching agreements with these taliban leaders. in their conceiving or already handing over military checkpoint