is the information going?s it anywhere that would be alarming to a parent? >> well, you know, look. i believe education technology holds all kind of promise. i certainly believe people intend to use it for he hadfying purposes. but the challenge here is that the consent of parents is not being factored in. it ought to be alamming because the information is being copied into longitudenal and permanent data basis that may be repurposed where you contribute the information for one reason and subsequent to that other uses become possible and the entity proceeds with those purposes. >> so we have something from one of our followers here, joel polunesky says parents and kids should own the data but schools, school district should use it to assess school performance and vendors to manage their services. if kids and parents owned the data tus point, do parents know when the data about their children is being shared with outside vendors? >> sure. so first of all, thank you for having me here and addressing this topic.

and that the information was given, name address, and phone number. and i am looking at page, under and i am looking under 14 and page eight, and the top of the page eight and number four, and appendix a. >> and the recommendation and the report and the recommendation. >> okay. >> and let's say that all five were handed out and then someone decided that they wanted to file a suit, and a privacy lawsuit and said that the park and rec gave up my information that was a violation of my privacy rights. how do you play that out and i am not an attorney but i would like to hear the attorneys talk about this stuff and so, really... >> leave me alone. >> yeah. >> and so you have a perverse curiosity. >> i have heard that on occasion and so the lawsuit is filed by one or all five of them and let's say that you have given out my information and it was implied, may not have it as a written policy, but that you do not give out the information, but it is implied that it is private until it is not private. and the lawsuit is filed. would that lawsuit have any standi

>> the definition section. >> the information shall be any information that could be used to identify an individual, including without limitation, name, address, social security number, medical information, financial information, date and location of birth, and names of relatives. >> but we have got the name of the person. we have got the names of all of the persons. >> but this includes... >> yes. right. >> so, if you are talking about in general you don't want to identify someone. and that is because of the privacy needs, but we have already identified it, the person by name, where is or where does it then follow that the rest of those things, such as address and phone number, are somehow protected expressly protected against the disclosure requirements of 6726? >> i mean, i will leave it to the city attorney... >> first of all, it is through the chair. >> sure. >> yeah. >> and so, i guess, you should answer that question directly, but also you should express what your view is from the city attorney's department about whether this in fact should be disclosed or not, and i think that

>> so we have a blanket rule that we do not share personal information. we have the personal information of over 80,000 families, people who register for our classes, and swim lessons and our birth holders. on the advice of the city attorney, we understand that that constitutionally protected privacy right is very important and we also understand in this case that there was an alleged illegal transfer. that perhaps the public could have benefited if from knowing those names, however, we were dealing with the allegations of the illegal transfer, through the marina rules and our marina harbor master was dealing with that outside of the public records' request and so in terms of choosing, we are the custodian of records and got the records and hand went through and redacted the personal information. based on the fact that the allegation was being taken care of in another venue, if that makes sense? >> i don't understand anything about the other venue. but, in response to my question, i am just trying to figure out, as i read the sections that are involved he

. >> two weeks is fine with us we could possibly get you the information before that. i want to clarify the space that's a one story extension of the existing building is shared by the tenants above ate a laundry room as well it's my understanding they also use it. and if upper to see this portion here there's a photograph let me show you the photograph. >> president chiu. >> sir why don't i suggest, sir. why don't i suggest rather than you trying to present this consider asking both parties to present the information and bring back the hearing three weeks from now to give the departments time to respond >> any only question who shall and i i direct this information to. >> this board of supervisors and actually we did that i don't know who screened them but we'll be happy to provide them again. >> okay. i i understand may 20th i want to give our city departments to review the information and give feedback unfortunately, there's not a meeting over is 27 so it will be june 3rd so supervisor breed we transparence a motion to get the information by the 20th and the city de

situations to those kinds of information --subscriptions to that kind of information. there are those who betray this is an ogre that is invading privacy and never provide benefits. it is clear that even in the marketing area there are people who are happy to see products they are interested in and ultimately that is why businesses are marketing to people, because they think they have something you might want to purchase, presumably voluntarily. but some people get nervous when they see that we are trying to find people who are in financial distress and pressure subprime loan or some kind of payday loan or something that will get them into an even worse state. the danger a lot of people see in these practices is mainly that they are so effective. host: this if you are on twitter wants to know -- this viewer on whater wants to know - happens if they get inaccurate information. guest: you could get lists of someone who is in financial distress -- when people apply for jobs for example, a lot of people run credit checks on those people and if you get a bad credit score, t

. >> data brokers selling your private information. can the government stop them. later here - the push to bring our girls back. nigeria's stolen girls, and what we are learning about the power of boko haram. families ripped apart... >> racial profiling >> sometimes they ask questions... sometimes they just handcuff people... >> deporting dreams... destroying lives... >> this state is literally redefining what it means to be a criminal alien fault lines al jazeera america's hard hitting... >> they're locking the doors... >> ground breaking... >> we have to get out of here... >> truth seeking... award winning investigative documentary series fault lines the deported only on al jazeera america >> it can seem harmless, but as you click on how much detergent you buy, when you took your last vacation all becomes a footprint of your life and valuable to measuredders and marketers. the federal trade commission has put hard fact and figures on what so called data brokers know about you already and pose new ideas on how to stop them from sellin

to have more information than we do. the information we get from government is heavily filtered, late for our writing. is there a strategy you can ascribe from trusting those in authority to relying on our friends and our colleagues for information? >> i still think we should trust people in positions of authority during times of emergency. it is just the method of information dispersal at this moment in time is not nearly as efficient as it could become especially considering you're talking about a population carried around the television station and that is really the problem. what clued me onto how efficient it could be that conversation i had with gordon jones who made an app called guardian watch. he was a former firefighter. these are to take your phone in a time of emergency and you're able to take a picture what you see inside to a central location that can be distributed across everybody who might be affected by the situation. and as a couple competitors right now. compare that to the way we do with emergency co

but if you get the public information, yes, etc.? >> because everything is so intermingled on a cell phone or a tablet or a computer, you don't know what you're going to be getting when you push those buttons and start rummaging through the digital contents of the phone. >> in determining whether the examination of information on a cell phone is -- constitutes a search, what do you think we are doing? are we trying to -- are we answering an empirical question, what is the reasonable expectation of privacy of a of a person in 2014 who has a cell phone in his or her on his or her person? or are we legislating what we think is a good privacy rule? >> i think the court is determining whether or not in 2014 an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy against government intrusion into a device that carries around an increasingly large percentage of somebody's personal and private information. >> all right. well, a lot of that part of that is the person must act people must actually have that expectation. that must be the expectat

more time consuming information, taking in information and learning it as opposed to creating information. as you move into middle years they start developing more information, but still consuming information. in the high school years, by no means did they stop consuming information, but we start expecting them to start creating information and start creating work product. and then instructional use of technology, again, is somewhat analogous to sort of release of responsibility model where students in the earlier years can be very focused, the middle years will be more guided and the teachers will be there closely guiding their use of the [inaudible] and how students use technology and what technology they use. so with those guiding principles then we start thinking about what's the device look like and so for the primary device, by no means the only device in the early years we see the primary device being the tablet type because those types of devices are great at consuming information, however, we still see the need for laptops as well. in the middle years we see the shift towards lap

such information cannot be used. there have been detailed information by members on both side of the bow to craft the substitute amendment. theamendment will disrupt bipartisan agreement and accordingly i oppose the amendment. the question occurs on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. all those in favor respond by saying i. those opposed "no." the "no's" have it. is not agreed to. >> i have an amendment at the .esk >> an amendment to the amendment in the nature of the substitute offered by mr. gomert. page 17, answer the following. section 110, clandestine intelligence activities. 8161a1. it is considered as read in the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. >> i do appreciate the incredible amount of work that was done by those negotiating this agreement. what makes the structure strong is when the committee itself gets to look for little nuances that make the bill better. remembering my freshman term in a05/2006 when we took up renewal of the patriot act. we had a discussions behind the sce

situations to those kinds of information --subscriptions to that kind of information.re are those who betray this is an ogre that is invading privacy and never provide benefits. it is clear that even in the marketing area there are people who are happy to see products they are interested in and ultimately that is why businesses are marketing to people, because they think they have something you might want to purchase, presumably voluntarily. but some people get nervous when they see that we are trying to find people who are in financial distress and pressure subprime loan or some kind of payday loan or something that will get them into an even worse state. the danger a lot of people see in these practices is mainly that they are so effective. host: this if you are on twitter wants to know -- this viewer on whater wants to know - happens if they get inaccurate information. guest: you could get lists of someone who is in financial distress -- when people apply for jobs for example, a lot of people run credit checks on those people and if you get a bad credit score, they

information can occur safely. to meet this objective, the behnical objectives must shared in a timely actions of cyber defenders can discover and addressable motor abilities -- and address vulnerabilities. our approach enables the rapid sharing of information in a matter that assures the protection of privacy, civil liberties, and rights. as mentioned, the organization of fouram -- comprised branches. from october 1, 2013, 2 may 20, 2014, we have received many reports from partners. a significant increase from the reports we received in 2013. these reports included phishing campaigns. response to these incidents -- we publish technical and non-technical products, analyzing the characteristics of malicious cyber activity and improving the ability the organizations to reduce risk. when appropriate, all components have on-site into that response ands that can assist owners operators and their facilities in cooperation with the government partners. are withrtnerships more than 200 others worldwide. they are useful as

information in growing databases. >> what if you have a device that doesn't have the information but like a fit bit that tells you how many steps you take and the defendant says i have been in my house all afternoon and he wants to check to see if he walked four miles. is that something they can look at? >> i think probably not. and this is the categorical rule in robinson where it sweeps in the categorical rules in one direction and i think one for digital' information would sweep in. the fit bit, and this is true moreso of smart phones, tells you the information the court was concerned about in kilo. modern smartphones work the inside of people's house and monitor inside of people's body. >> what if the phone was an old fashion flipphone with the capacity to take pictures but a more limited memory. would that be a different case? >> that would be part of the conversation in the next case perhaps. i think the easy way to decide the case in 2014 is saying digital evidence kept on modern cellphones are different than physical items. i don't think it is worth going back in time -- >> w

you will share information?ou, senator. we're in support of information sharing. we're happy to work on the details of that, yes. >> do you think that is the step? >> i think that is an important step. i also think the government can work on disrupting the financial side. talking about enforcement, going after the criminals and penalizing the criminals? >> yes, making it hard for them to make money. are sellingse guys products, they are taking credit cards, they are cashing checks. can't arrest them because they are not in our jurisdiction, we can make it to profit.or them >> would that require more regulation in the banking industry? maybe some targeted actions there? i don'tot a lawyer so know the exact. i think it is already illegal, i issue.t is a focus >> what can government do? what is the first step? >> senator, you mentioned, basically, looking at being able to allow information. clear, my team does the anti-malware advertising. to ourappy to speak colleagues openly about the different threats and what w

that's probably available to inform the way we make sure b that number one we're going to have the right outcome for the community and the for the offender this is a place in the last two natives have done a lot to lessen the incarceration and this is understanding the circumstances around an offender as well as the neighborhood and the victim have important for us there's a wealth of data we can't access and this we should find essential certainly i do this is not the way to run a more than that public safety system in the 21st century. i believe we owe our community a lot more than that one of the things we're trying to do hopefully illuminate for you how business is being done if other communities and one of the community eave looked at there are a leader in this area the district attorney's office i personally spent time there in the last year today, i'm pleased to introduce the person that actually runs the crime strategy unit that's an attorney she made the trip her because she has the same level of commitment to the profession in general. so i want to introduce keri. >> good after

information in growing databases. >> what if you have a device that doesn't have the information but like a fit bit that tells you how many steps you take and the defendant says i have been in my house all afternoon and he wants to check to see if he walked four miles. is that something they can look at? >> i think probably not. and this is the categorical rule in robinson where it sweeps in the categorical rules in one direction and i think one for digital' information would sweep in. the fit bit, and this is true moreso of smart phones, tells you the information the court was concerned about in kilo. modern smartphones work the inside of people's house and monitor inside of people's body. >> what if the phone was an old fashion flipphone with the capacity to take pictures but a more limited memory. would that be a different case? >> that would be part of the conversation in the next case perhaps. i think the easy way to decide the case in 2014 is saying digital evidence kept on modern cellphones are different than physical items. i don't think it is worth going back in time -- >> w

so we're going to be able to get a lot of information off of that for sure. >> there's a lot of informationg us make sense of this. appreciate it. >>> now we want to take you to this week's "impact your world." when british golfer justin rose moved to the u.s. in 2004 he and his wife were surprised to learn how many american families struggle just to put food on the table. so they teamed up with a national charity to help feed hungry kids. >> thank you. >> you're welcome, sweetie. >> reporter: for these kids, blessings come in the form of apples, corn, even tuna. >> that's a nice smile you have there. >> reporter: thanks to blessings in a backpack, elementary students on a federally funded school meal program can take home a bag of food for the weekend. >> it helps me, because sometimes we don't have enough money to buy food. >> we can't expect children to turn up monday morning on school and expect them to learn, be in a good state for learning when they haven't had enough food unfortunately over the weekend. >> reporter: kate rose and her golf pro husband justin helped feed six kids in fi

report from cochair sup initiate. >> item 5: information item. report from the director of the mayor's office on disability. item 6. information item. bart new train cars, design and public input. the presentation will provide an overview of the fleet of the future project which will replace bart's aging fleet and expand the number of cars to relief crowded conditions on the bart system. it will include an overview of outreach that has been conducted and information on accessible features of the new trains that have been included in the design based on the input from the bart accessibility task force and other disability organizations over the last 3 years. presentation by aaron wine stein, bart chief marketing officer and lead design are on bart' new train cars. >> break. the council will take a 10 -minute break. >> item 7. information item. feedback from the disability and senior organizations on the bart new car design. brian bashin, executive director, lighthouse for the #3w4r50i7bd and visually impaired sfravenlt jessie lorenz, executive dir

appellants argue the economic information presented in the eps report is proposed certification informationt requires the production of supplemental or subsequent e-i-r. this is not the case. specifically, the appellants argue that after certification of the e-i-r, the project sponsor provided information that there were feasible alternatives, tower heights lower than alternative in the eir shorter than the project's maximum analyzed 5 25-foot tower. in addition, the appellant says the city cannot make findings there are no feasible mitigation measures. the fact that the sponsor provided feasibility information after certification does not alter the analysis or conclusions in the certified e-i-r. for the purpose of c-e-q-a review, cumulative shadow impact determination was based on the project's considerable contribution to the significant and unavoidable cumulative shadow on all downtown park open spaces as identified in transit center district planning e-i-r and not in one particular park. finally, it is not the department's practice to include in the city's determination -- to include th

and use the information obtained? >> i believe that the police can examine the contents -- >> examine the contents of the wallet but not read it? or may not the police examine the wallet, finding number -- finding number, and act on that information? yes or no? >> this court has not addressed the reading of information examined in searching for -- >> it seems to me that it is fairly clear that the content that are seized and in the can -- possession of the arrestee, the police can act on it. under the justifications which were reiterated in robinson, the justifications are officer safety and evidence preservation. which does not necessarily encompass reading. the cell phone, you don't have to resolve whether it is appropriate to read paper documents you come across. they onlynt is information they got and used with the phone number and address of the house. and that it was his house. that is what is on your driver's license. >> they are residences. they needed his driver's license, which i had. >> i'm trying to see wh

too much information. >> that's a recipe for disaster. when an organization that has no accountability, collecting sensitive and voluminous information on people. and when they have a security incident that jeopardises the security of that information there really aren't any consequences. data brokers selling your private information, can the government stop them? later here - the push to bring our girls back. nigeria's stolen girls, and what we are learning about the power of boko haram. >> it seems like they can't agree to anything in washington no matter what. >> antonio mora, award winning and hard hitting. >> we've heard you talk about the history of suicide in your family. >> there's no status quo, just the bottom line. >> but, what about buying shares in a professional athlete? real perspective, consider this on al jazeera america families ripped apart... >> racial profiling >> sometimes they ask questions... sometimes they just handcuff people... >> deporting dreams... destroying lives... >> this state is literally redefining what

while not providing the actual words spoken this information revealed highly personal and sensitive informationthat contains it -- campaign to detailed pictures of a persons associations and activities. congress never intended to authorize this type of unchecked sweeping surveillance of our our citizens. instead by authorizing collection of relative records we required a reasonable relationship between the collection of records and persons being investigated for suspected of terrorism. his this relevant standard was effectively written out of the statute when the fisa court accepted the government's argument that the entire universe of core records are relevant because it allows a search for calls associated with terror suspects. diminishes men's fixes this by expressly banning bull collection in requiring the government includes the list -- specific term that identifies the specific person entity or account to be used as the basis for requesting court order authorizing the collection of any information that is restores meaning to to the terminal that by requiring the government to establish ou

i just hope it's informed public will. and frankly, when the decisions are made, you understand the costs. >> we have to strike the right balance between protecting our security and preserving our freedoms. >> narrator: the president did what executives in the midst of a controversy often do... >> review of our surveillance programs... >> narrator: he appointed a panel. >> so i am tasking this independent group to step back... >> narrator: this one to review the nsa's programs. >> and they will provide an interim report in 60 days and a final report by the end of this year, so that we can move forward with a better understanding... >> the president's directions were, "go wherever you want. you can see any classified program. no one can deny you any information. you can go anywhere in the intelligence community. you can recommend anything. except, realize that what i won't accept is any block between me and my constitutional oath of defending the united states." >> the highly classified program is code-named prism. >> the g

we found that the data brokers collect information on almost every u.s.sumer household and transaction. >> almost every? >> almost every. we can't say for sure it will be everyone, but it will be pretty difficult for a consume tore escape the net. >> this is extraordinarily. what you are proposing here for trying to limit the amount of information these folks have access to. >> we propose that the data brokers provide more transparency and provide consumers with access to the information they collect about them, as well as an opportunity to opt out or correct information where appropriate. >> doesn't this put the onus on me as the consumer to try to track down who's been collecting what on me? >> we recommend a centralized mechanism, such as an internet portal where they can go to find out about the different data brokers, what type of information they collect and what control they provide. >> something like a credit reporting service, a single portal, or maybe a limited number of portals, where eight as a consumer could find out who's tapping into what r

i went back to get more information congresswoman. i think i took the issues in phoenix very seriously and i think what we found was shared with and confirmed by the inspector general and because of what i did in phoenix we were able to get people on the ground to begin the process for making recommendations of change. i am sorry you misinterrupted my intentions which are to help veterans to make assure they get good care and see where the system is falling. >> that is our intention to and wefeel like we need to work 24 hours a day seven days a week and not take holidays off. thank you very much. we appreciate it and yield back. >> mr. lynch, you believe phoenix is an isolated incident or did you believe this is a systemic issue? >> i believe the inspector general has made it clear it is a systemic problem. >> we have asked for 18 reports that have been identified coming back. you had in october and november of 2012 where a report came back -- you talked about a glitch in the system. this doesn't seem to be a faulty computer system th

to get that information quicker. utilizing the customs and border protection that was a huge asset and there are tons of customs and border protection staff on the airport and we want to use that in the future and incorporate them more into our plans and one unique aspect that we didn't have in our plans is the fact that on this flight there was a large number of unaccompanied minors who were traveling and once they were transported and making sure that they had adequate support and being that they didn't have a parent or guardian with them was something that we wanted to improve upon and have multiple layers of support if we have that situation again and unaccompanied minors so that they feel that they have that support and comfort when they are in a different country or a different area, without that parental support. and finally, what we have done is one thing that we realized that was a positive was the airlines and their alliance partners and so asiana airlines is alliance parter with united, everyone is aware t

but there is a lot of information. so, i will go through it and look forward to your questions and comments afterwards. how many of you have had an opportunity to see perrot -- prototypes and models to see our new cars? if you want more information then i have time for a website that i can recommend at bart .gov/cars. so that is bart .gov/cars. so today i'm going to cover three topics. first some general background information about the project. the second is some specific information about accessible features on the new train cars. and thirdly talk about one of the open issues that's had a lot of discussion in the disability community around the proposed tripod pole. i'm now on slide two which is entitled fleet of the future, why new cars. bart has very old train cars, as you may have noticed if you have ridden the system. most are 40 years old. the same cars have been running. it's the oldest fleet of train cars among big cities in america. they have performed very well. they have carried billions of rides in the las

rather, it's a multidirectional throw no of information. it's not -- flow of information.it's not a science knowledge versus an indigenous vodge server issues another knock. it is a gathering of all knowledge for problem solving in ways that are most appropriate. also, it's a willingtons roll up your sleeves and get to work. i'm not speaking of the nasa blue marble that was so famous behind me and i think about the words that my brother would say, we are in this together and we are shoulder to to shoulder facing the same direction and it takes commitment from everybody. i put that challenge out to you and primarily for myself. how have i made the commitments i made to my children, my wife and to my mother before she passed. have i fulfilled those commitments? those are the things that keep me awake at night and things that also inspire me to work in the morning. >> in terms of some of the uses i've seen of this kind of data that has impressed me -- i'll highlight a few and i think they in the aftermath of extreme disasters, often we find many and we have customers and clie

but it was based on currently-available information. as you can imagine in the days after an attack in a regional city in a faraway country, that information was not complete. which is what we said repeatedly. mr. finish. [inaudible] >> you've got the house majority leader today going on twitter saying it's time for the white house to come clean on benghazi and urging his followers to retweet his twitter. [laughter] >> well, as a representation of the superficiality of the partisan attack, i think you've made a good point. but the fact of the matter is, again, voluntarily in response to some bogus partisan claims made by republicans to reporters about what were, what had happened in the compilation of the original talking points around the benghazi attack, we produced that material publicly which which showed that we were right and they were wrong, that they were mischaracterizing what those e-mails and those points said. and so that is part of an effort that includes something like 25,000 pages of documents produced, hours and hours of

i don't know where axiom is getting their information but they probably have infinitely more informationn this about me and this is what they're selling to other people? i want to go find out how much they really have. there are literally hundreds of these aggregators doing business but most of the time they'd rather not be seen or heard. >> hello. thank you for calling. thank you for calling tower data. >> hi, you have reached pamela. >> hi, you have reached jessica. >> please leave your message after the tone. >> hey, this is morgan spurlock calling. hey, tom. hey, pam. it's morgan spurlock. i couldn't get through to anybody on the phone. but i'm not that easy to get rid of. maybe one of these companies would rather talk to me in person. so we are in dallas, texas. enroute to epsilon, one of the largest data collecting companies. i have tried to make contact to them and they have basically said they don't want to talk to us. this whole business operates in the shadows, no one will go on camera and put a face to that faceless industry. i just want answers. and here it is. here's the hea

[speaker not understood] i would like to highlight a couple of sections for your information. on page 5 is our audit timeline and this identifies when we will start the audit for fiscal year 2013-2014 and some of the key dates as well as when we plan to report back to the gao -- >> which in particular? >> of the audit service plan it's -- >> of the documents we've been provided with? >> right, it should be in your packet. >> got it. >> so, we are starting our audit for the 2013-14 fiscal year now. we are doing our planning procedures. we'll come out and do [speaker not understood] testing [speaker not understood] at the year-end kloza round september, october and we target [speaker not understood] all the different components by october-november and the city single audit, the audit of the city's federal awards will complete -- they will be completed by next february, march time frame. so, we are targeting to report back on the fiscal year 13-14 audit result in april of 2015 back to the board or the committee. >> thank you. i just have one general comment. in particular, one of

how did you learn of this information?was obtained to assure you that the nigerian government knew that boko haram had this plan? >> thank you very much for having us on the station. well, when this abduction took place, when the attack took place, we received information from our people on the ground and from different sources. and we have been working on this information for about three weeks, just to cross check and verify what people have been telling us, and what they have been saying is that on the 14th of april, information was sent to the security forces by villagers, and by vigilantes who have been set up by the local authorities together with the nigerian security forces to pass on information about any strange happening or strange people in their localities. so this information was sent at 7:00 and the officers immediately after receiving this information transmit ted to a navy yard that has a battalion. all the local authorities also received information as the time progressed and it was relayed to the security

they'll cherry pick information. people are still trying to sell the idea that twa 800 was shot down by missiles. and the idea is, this data is hard to analyze. they brought in outside experts. they came to the same conclusions. now, should they defend it publicly? they should. >> you agree? >> yes. >> what about the search, because now australia's suggesting, you know what, the actual search in the southern indian ocean, not necessarily going to go forward with government assistance, private companies are going to get involved. it looked like the search situation in the area where they thought they heard some pings from the black box, that might be going away at least for now. >> i think the australians were a little enthusiastic at the beginning. >> where they said they woulder in end that search, they would go forever? >> also about their optimism about the pings. this is very hard work. it's going to take a very long time. and the bluefin did not have the capabilities to get the job done in all aspects of this se