mahar and harris made crude and overexemplifycations, and yet it is real. i know about speaking against islam is vast and e reactionary and a vast world and in places like indonesia and india have hundreds of millions of muslims who don't fit the caricature, and that is why they are guilty of overexaggeration and simp simplification, but be honest, islam has a problem today. in 2013, according to the state department, of the top ten groups who perpetrated terrorist attacks, seven were muslims, and of the top ten countries where attacks took place, zen of seven of them were muslim countries. and so there is governments that are imposed by the free exercise of religion and of the most restricted, 19 of them are mostly islam majority. there is a extreme majority, but a small amount of muslims harbor deep e reactionary attitudes toward women and militaries, and of those, there are not loud enough voices. and how many rallys have been held for pro islam? and the simple problem with mahar and harris's analogies is that it takes islam and describes it in a way tha