you have to do -- deal with that. the pressure is on to make the russians and assad think that are not going to survive. maybe i cut my deal now. >> john kerry said we might have an agreement with the iranians in terms of the nuclear negotiations in three or four months. are you optimistic? >> unfortunately, i'm not. we've seen issues where we think they are playing games. at the p5 plus one, after we extended the first time at before we gave a recent extension, they signed a deal with the russians. that's a clear indicator to me that maybe we've got problems here. think about where the iranians are. they have influence and the sunni capital in yemen. they have undue influence in iraq. they are causing mischief in bahrain. our partners are really coming out of their chairs in frustration at this. all of that activity is going on a while they very narrowly are trying to get some deal that many of us think it's too generous for the iranians. when we started, we were not going to allow them to enrich. they are taught abou

hard to do. so those we'll define. i think for the remainder of the administration, of course, the middle east and russia are going to be dominant themes. i think we need to keep trying to raise people's sights a little bit to beyond the immediate tactical to, what are we trying to do here, what's our ultimate point here given realistic possibilities. i don't get to have too many priorities in my current job, though as i said, somebody the other day, i spent my whole career avoiding the middle east. that's over. as the kids would say, that's so over. right? so i've learned a lot. >> #acdisrupt. >> otherwise, on my personal list, i think china and east asia has to be at the top of the list of so much going on there, so much chance of multiple issues at play, connecting in ways, people making miscalculations. we know there are going to be bumps ahead in the road for china. we don't know how bad they're going to be, but there are going to be some bumps. and there may be good ones as well. i think that whole combination of

i am open to doing it jointly or doing it separately, so that's where i am at. thank you. >> thank you. commissioner lindo. >> first i want to thank counsel for suggesting the plan and perhaps having a separate meeting. i think it's a good idea for us to have an action, a vote, to have a presentation that we can then give to the puc and say this is how we see this plan working, and this is what we offer to you, and after having a discussion with enernex and a discussion internally to say what is it that we want? because if we start discussing it the way i see it with puc it starts changing before our eyes and i would like us to have something solid because there is room to move a little bit but at the end of the day this is what we're presenting and the way we would like to see it. i think there are staff issues to deal with before the discussion with enernex but a question i have for ms. hale i am assuming when this gets presented to the puc commission that staff will be providing a recommendation of some form, and i have heard that you're anxious and exciting t

what are we going to do to her? and her pom poms pink and then we're going to do a leopard pattern on her and maybe a couple flowers. >> let's make it happen. >> this is going to take the both of us. >> well, tell me what to do. >> you take this. >> yeah. >> you are going to pull the hair up and spray just a little bit, i'm going to brush it back and dry it. >> tell me more about what's in here. >> it's a hair dye for dogs. >> of course it is. how long have you had the place? >> 28 years. >> how long have you been here? >> almost two years. >> yeah? you love it? >> yes, i do. >> are you just saying that because your boss is here. >> no. >> you really do love it? >> yeah, i do. i've had other offers to work other places. >> hey. >> you want an employee who is in demand. you absolutely want that. this is a very well behaved dog. i've got to say. >> this is a good girl. >> how many people are painting dogs? >> well, a lot. and it's gone international now. when i first started doing this, it was real secretive. nobody w

am i going to be able to do this? to leverage what i have and not be so self-conscious about the things that i'm not good at. because you already have ten people in your class that you can connect with and work with and collaborate with. >> look at this. it's a computer science class that could be entirely taught online and is to a large extent, but still look at how many people who are in this dining hall who need help. they need help in person, that's why they're here. >> could you walk me through that, i don't know what that means. >> okay, when you see square bracket, that usually means -- >> so it should be more commas? >> so, by doing this, this wards off one of those attacks we started talking about briefly. a sequel injection attack. students require constant engagement on my part, on the teaching staff's part. most of us are up at all hours of the night. we have 24/7 coverage, students can ask questions at any hour and get answers. so you're on the right track. get the whole thing working and then you can plu

is the right thing to do. s ultimately the right thing to do. >> i can persuade the american people it is the right thing to do. >> this is the right thing to do for our economy. >> the president said amnesty is the right thing to do. he used the right thing line on every topic on every issue from the economy to education to taxes and so-called green energy and a lot more. in 2010, he used the line 18 times in one speech, but how could so much have gone so wrong if president obama actually understood the right thing to do? i just want to leave that question for us all to ponder. thank you for being with us and good night from new york. [ dynamic music continues ] [ dynamic music continues ] [ dynamic music continues ]

it, but i would like to see him do it more. i would like to see him engage in the battles that have to be fought, in order to try to get legislation passed on the hill. i would like to see him engaged in the effort to try to do what needs to be done to get a budget deal passed, to get immigration reform passed, to get infrastructure funding done, to get trade legislation passed, too do an energy bill for this country. these are all important issues. and i know that congress is resist extent and they're tough and they're people there that basically want to bring -- tear down the government and not make it work. but you can't just sit back and say, i guess we can't get it done. you cannot say that. you have to continue to push. you have to continue to look for openings. you have to continue to work with those people who will work with you. it demands constant, constant pressure, to be able to make it work. that's the nature of being a president of the united states, you have to constantly be in the ring fighting for what is right

i don't. >> if you didn't have to do this do you want to do it? >> if we don't have to do it, we won't do it. >> okay. >> then we need to have a little more time. >> do you have something to add to what i just talked about. >> come forward. please wait until the commissioner returns until you start speaking. >> i don't have the the documents here, but what i found is they were working on a permit from 2010 and on those permit drawings, the is engineer had shown making a bathroom accessible and a path of travel that turned out to have a 21 inch height difference which he hadn't realized. so when the field inspector saw that that was there that was not an accessible path of travel to the accessible bathroom from the other space he said oh, you need to have the entrance of 735 but accessible and that 's when i got brought in to solve that problem. that was a correction notice, not a notice of violation on the field inspector that triggered this. >> in looking at the previous drawings you're saying? a: right. there's something that didn't work the way

so what was i doing prior to my arrest? was uniting hackers and activists from around the world, correct? after my arrest, i am doing the same exact thing. unfortunately now there are logs, that's the part that really hurt me the most. >> rose: tell me about jeremy hammond. >> an interesting character. he is not as they portrayed him to be. he was just a random activist who had some hacking skills and he wanted to be a part of low sec like many of the hackers. unfortunately for them it was only a team of six, losec but he hung around us and worked with us, we communicated daily, and once wall sec met its end he participated with operation anti-security. >> rose: you know what some of them are saying, they say you coerced them. >into doing some stuff. >> it is kind of difficult. the question is, it bothers me a little bit because prior to my arrest, my conversations with people were the same conversations you saw between me and jerry hammonds. oh you are hacking into the government of brazil? awesome, what information did you

they're not doing it to save money. they're doing it because it's 2004. >> that's a drop in the bucket from coca-cola. >> don't miss lauren on her sister network. log on to fox business.com. >> well, now to other time wasters, including one that sucks up a whopping 40% to 60% of your prers time a day. what is the one thing? joining me now with the lowdown, edward brown, president and founder of cohen brown management group which specializes in time management consulting and training. great to have you on the show. all right. i have been waiting all day long. what is the one thing that eats up 40% to 0% of all of our time per day? >> grechen, i call them time bandits. time bandits mean no harm, but they have no malice or forethought. they can be your children. your friends. they can be your supervisors. they can be your producers. nevertheless, they steal your time, and they steal a lot of it. >> what do you mean by that, though? they interrupt your daily schedule, right? they are interruptors or time bandits. >> exactly.

i'm not able to do that, she is able to do that. now, whether or not this is technically a violation, to me does not matter. i believe that the board these to be held to a very high standard, including the standard of the appearance of a conflict. as a federal employee we were all admonished that we have a look at the appearance of the conflict as well as the conflict, that otherwise we would not be able to generate any kind of trust from the public and i believe city workers, whether in the charter or not, needs to be able to be held to that standard as well, especially with the amount of money on the table. my second point is with respect to wendy paskin-jordan is in terms of the excellent definition we were given of a fiduciary is to put the interest of the trustees board as above their own interests and that's why everyone here is talking about the risk of fossil fuel investment that you voted on and was ignored by miss paskin-jordan as the chair of that committee. so together with the hedge fund issue, all of these are fiduciar

i had to do this four times. i very carefully picked my battles because, like any normal person, i didn't want to die, but i was prepared to go all the way each time and my opponents understood that. >> charlie: mikhail khodorkovsky next. >> rose: funding for "charlie rose" has been provided by: >> rose: additional funding provided by: >> and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and information services worldwide. captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. >> charlie: mikhail khodorkovsky is here. he was until recently russia's most famous prisoner. president putin pardoned him in december after more than ten years of imprisonment. he was an oligarch who became wealthy in the era of russia's post-soviet crony capitalism. when masked men arrested him at gunpoint ino three, he was russia's richest man and the chairman of yukos oil. he and his partner platon lebdev were convicted on charges of tax fraud and embezzlement in two widely publicized trials.

wanted you to do more. >> did not want us to stop the program. >> it was all legal, in your judgment, at that time? >> yes. >> when you have defined what the cia was doing at the time as torture? >> let me talk about this. torture, in the context we are discussing it, is a legal term. it doesn't matter what you think is torture or what i think is torture. it is what the lawyers think is torture. and the department of justice. on multiple occasions, they have said these techniques are not torture. they do not rise to the legal standard of torture as defined in the torture act in the u.s. or in our treaty obligations that the u.s. has signed up to. the department of justice of said this is not torture. as you know from our other discussions, this is one of the things that drives me crazy. when people say this is torture. it drives me crazy because the justice department says it is not. more important, when somebody calls a torture, even the president, it says that my officers who carried out these operations at the direction of the president and were told by the department of justice th

i mean, i'm going to do what i have to do to come see him, so if that means having to do all these crazys worth it just to be able to see him, so, get used to it. >> i'm looking for contraband. anything that's not authorized. drugs. i need to make sure that everything is approved. everything has to be vendor sealed and it has to have recognizable labels on here. so, this is allowed. no cans are allowed. they are allowed to bring in a plastic container and i've got to transfer this in. it has to be brand new, because then we know it hasn't been tampered with. if it's open, it could be anything in here. this could be alcohol or something flammable. so it has to be brand new. it is very extensive, but they're willing to do that so see their loved ones. >> to be able just to sleep next to your spouse is just, oh, it's the greatest, you know. just being able to put your arm over her, or you know, talk, watch tv together, just being together for those -- it's not even really two days. it's just under, but man, it's just, you forget for a second where you're at. >> it gets lonely, you know? you

to him. what are they doing about that? getsometimes you have around staff which i used to do and got me in a lot of trouble. it when ididn't like did that. i think that obama needs to lead and show movement. o'connell is determined to try to do that. would like to. he is still struggling with some conference members. but i think that is where it begins. >> i'm sorry. ahead, no. >> just to say i'm encouraged by the rhetoric that i heard during campaign about wanting toe wano better.hington work congress at an approval rating of 14% right now. turnout in 72er years. 36%. fore is ample reason everyone who got elected recently to want to make washington work better. two reasons we haven't talked about yet. of authorityosion and institutional pout power and house and the senate itself. the more they are dysfunctional more they cede power and authority to someone who isn't. cede the power to the president who takes executive action or two their ownwho do thing. they have to ask themselves. think anybody in that institution wants

to do that. and to build support for it. and i think all those things are exceedingly important, and then you have to stay at it, and one of the things that i hardly ever see, george, that it don't think of this, and we never talk about it, but i watched all those debates he had with vice president gore. not a single one of them did either one of them get asked, what are you going to do when they blow up the world trade center? so, if you take a leadership position, you very often -- particularly in an uncertain world, if you don't do or get caught trying to do what you said you were going to do when you ran you feel like you have let yourself and your supporters down. or if you take a job as chairman of a company, same thing. or start a small business. on the other hand, you can't ignore the incoming fire. that's what really damaged our friend in south africa. he said, mandela created a modern political state. i'll create a modern economy, and here comes aids. so you have to deal with that and then you have to try to think

what are we going to do? past precedents have been that presidents have been able to use executive orders to really scircumvent this body, when do you say enough is enough? that's what we have been saying all along. now i think we will get help that we have so desperately needed in the senate to do a lot of things that we should have gotten done with the help of the senate. i want to let you know, all of us at least on this side of the aisle are pretty upset with the executive overreach of this president and the executive branch. and we're going to continue to do the right thing as we move forward. i want to thank you, mr. chairman, and thank those that are here today. >> back to the gentleman from orlando, florida is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i don't know exactly what to say. i feel that -- i hope we're not over promising anything. i feel like, you know, we failed in the past. we're going to fail again. but this is a body that i believe should operate including the senate. we should do what we b

we made the decision not to do that. we made the decision with fixing intelligence and with the strategic assessment we did, to call it in a way that -- that i would absolutely comfortable now, still intellectually honest, but that's a lot harder than it seems. there are subtle pressures on you to -- to adjust what you say and to pull your punches a little bit. but i was happy when we didn't do that. and, obviously, people ask me what i regret? i regret the "rolling stone" article. i don't really regret anything else. i think that if we had not gone at it with that same idea that we're going to do if right so we can look ourselves in the mirror later, that i'd regret that much more. >> questions? yes, right here on the end. get a microphone up there. we have just a couple of minutes here. so just ask you to keep it short. >> okay. great. first of all, generals, thank you both for your service to the country, and what i think is probably the most honest mission of anyone in this room, protecting this great country, so than

we need to do that we didn't do number one. number two, the president of iraq has said he will not permit troops, foreign troops on his ground. so unless we are going to invade against the will of a country, i think that's -- the iraqi prime minister, not the president. the prime minister said that, and unless we're going to go ahead and invade in opposition to a sovereign country who in this case is taking the fight themselves, which is a whole other complicating factor. thirdly, i do envision boots on the ground, but they're just not american boots. they're iraqi boots, they're kurdish boots, modern syrian forces boots and maybe other allies who will put boots on the ground with the engagement of and cooperation of those countries in which the fight presently takes place. and finally, i know some people have reference on both sides of the aisle that we -- that we tie the hands of the commander in chief, that that is actually envisioned by the founders. my view, we create checks and balances on the commander in chief as is envi

that's what i want to do next. i want to talk about what i think is wrong with the prevailing view of cronyism with an eye toward what i think is right about it. in other words, what should we be criticizing when we criticize cronyism? if you are with me and you think there's a real fundamental issue here that we need to talk about, we need to think about how this issue is used and what i would say is the great injustice done in the idea of cronyism. now, if i had to boil my theme in this part down to one essential point it would be this. cronyism is kind of a fuzzy term that packages together two things that don't belong together. one of them is bad and one of them is good. the impact of this is too good and to elevate the bad. the impact of this is to damn the good and elevate the bad. it's sort of sullies the good part. what is the good? actually let me backup at second. this is what if you are interested what i'm getting at here is what ayn rand would have preferred as a package deal. this is an idea for a term

we have a mandate to do that. but in the cases of dealing with a company that might be collecting in fings and a consumer is trying to figure out exactly what kind of information, they're not given very many tools to figure that out. so the most i can imagine a consumer being able to do is really educating themselves on how much of their interactions are tracked to benefit a product and they need to decide are they willing to have that tracking part of their experience online and really get out of the framework that it's free because they are the product in that moment. it's not free. >> professor, microsoft researcher, mary gray has been our guest. joe marks has been our guest reporter from "politico." >> c-span, created by america's cable companies 35 years ago and brought to you as a public service by your local cable or atellite provider. on this weekend's "newsmakers" john yu is our guest. he served as deputy assistant attorney general in the george w. bush administration when he wrote several memos that are v

i don't know what to do about it. i don't want to be a pessimist, i am a very optimistic person, but i would say that i am not so sure that any of that is going to change. but -- just as this bachmann offered an amendment on the bill in the first week's session after we gained a majority, we were told we can't do it then. are you back for the same one? i don't know. we still haven't done it. i hope that is not the case here. we can actually take our cards out and use them every chance we get for as many amendments as we offer. --ave said over and over let's start at 8:00 in the morning and work to 6:00 every night, and take up every one of these issues every time we get a chance, and don't leave the most important issues to the end. i remember one time i learned my lesson about how legislative bodies work. when the state of florida, the first bill they took up was the e.ming of the state ti there is an important issue. after midnight on the last day of session, they passed the budget. they passed the rewrite of the wel

. >> come back to the east coast. yeah. >> do you think they'll know -- >> randi kaye giggling talking about whipping out small cannons. just to be clear, i'm not taking pot shots at randi kaye here but many of us thought this was the greatest live hit. so randi, thank you very, very much. >> keep watching "360" as we count down the next four. we'll see you back here again at 11:00 p.m. eastern. somebody's got to do it starts right now. >> oh, god. come on. you make me look like a jackass on tv. i'm sorry. but you got to drink it. i did it. shocking. stay thirsty, my friends. okay. where am i and why am i feeding a baby goat? well, it started with a long drive up the california coast. up where the redwood trees just seemed to get taller and taller and the fog along the rocky coast gets thicker and thicker. it's a little place called humboldt county, the middle of nowhere, old hippie haven that's become an incubator for a new kind of american entrepreneur and where the ultimate earth mother went from poverty to prosperity selling

>> there are all kinds of things to do to streamline them, but it would not be good to streamline them. >> you mentioned marissa mayer. >> i think she should not be evaluated on what she cannot do, she is trying to improve those incrementally and that is fantastic. >> other than what you have written in this, what are some things that you believe that very few people agree with you on? >> certainly an issue that i have been outspoken on is college education, it has become something of a bubble. a trillion dollars of student debt, not getting what we are paying for, and it has to be rethought of in a very fundamental way. >> if you could start education over again, what would you do? would there be no school? >> they are stuck in the 19th century, i think you need to figure out more ways to make them innovative, let students learn at their own pace. >> you do have a scholarship where you give aspiring entrepreneurs an amount of money to not go to school, and i know some of those entrepreneurs have gone back to school. >> most of them have not. it was designed as a two-year program in wh

they just don't want to do it. in the house of representatives, because the committee structure and leadership structure, they have so much power. we can introduce all the wonderful bills we want. we're up to like hr 5600 in this congress. the leadership and the chairman decide which bills go to the floor. those of us who are trying to get legislation to the floor, we have to look for opportunities. they are few and far between. in fact, it reminds me as an engineer of the first invention where they tried to do movies and this thing rotated. it was called a daedulum but it had slits in it and a slit goes by and you can see a picture on the other side of the drum. that's -- occasionally photons pass through that draw him, and that is the way i look at our legislative opportunities. occasionally, there is a slit in the drum and you can get a few photons in there. one of those opportunities is in the form of a limitation amendment to an appropriations bill. congress has the power of the purse and the democratic thing t

i want to do the minimum. ande went down that path congress followed in 1990 eight with bill clinton, it throws the nation into turmoil. i do not want to see that. i do not want to see any american go through any tougher turmoil than it already has their it we want opportunity for everybody. let this go unchallenged. we would be violating our oath to the constitution and our pledge to the american people and our constituents and the people who went to the polls a couple of weeks ago. we would be violating all of that if we let this go unchallenged. withu have nine days to do this spending deadline. how do you do it all in nine days? >> the house can move quickly if the house has to move. reason i supported the continuing resolution is so that we be in a position to use leverage on the president. if we did long-term resolution and gone home for thanksgiving, we would have no tools to constrain the president. my argument this morning is put no tools in the present's toolbox, let's use the minimum authority we can

whatever i need to do to hold the puc accountable if they're holding up this process because there are ways to do that, and the chair and other members of the board have done that before, and i think that we as members of the board have to be continuing willing to do that so i want to be very clear where we are because i would hope that whether a job is terkically a construction job or not would not get in the way of this project moving forward. thank you. >> great. thank you. commissioner campos. commissioner. >> yes, i want to thank the staff and for the dialogue. i have a question for the puc. you mentioned some of the readers may have issues understanding the data. what readers are we discussing? you had mention the commission but is that the only readers are you discussing or others we should be considering? >> commissioner, barbara hale assistant manager for power. i am anticipating when we have the joint meetings and presentations and we talk about this and see news articles or trade press on this that these numbers are going to be used and i want to make sure that we get cl

do you understand that? >> yeah, that is where i am trying to dow with this. >> yeah, they have to do what they promise to do and we see it. >> and they will do what we decide here,, and what the building department says that they will do. okay? >> yeah. >> and all right. >> planning department and that i think we already stated kind of our analysis and our concerns related to section, 317 on the planning code and the department knows that this is properly before the board for your decision and you are trying to resolve this in a matter that is trying to resolve and address the concerns in the safe and ha bitable building and but i will, let me raise two points because that has also been made as part of the wish list and i am not supportive of getting rid of the set back on the third floor. i think that that is a standard of the bench of the design lines and it reduce its from the street and i would like to keep that. and the other thing is that there are no light wells shown on the existing floor plans

is the right thing to do. s ultimately the right thing to do. >> i can persuade the american people it is the right thing to do. >> this is the right thing to do for our economy. >> the president said amnesty is the right thing to do. he used the right thing line on every topic on every issue from the economy to education to taxes and so-called green energy and a lot more. in 2010, he used the line 18 times in one speech but how could so much have gone so wrong if president obama actually understood the right thing to do? i just want to leave that question for us all to ponder. k >>> tonight on "war stories" -- >> i remember the smell. you could smell death even before you get there. >> world war ii's biggest land. >> you could hear men screaming for help. >> massacre of american soldiers. >> you just can't imagine what went on on that field. >> and a military message that became a electric end on two continents. >> he said, i surrender? ah nuts. >> battle of the bulge, that's next on "war stories." >>> good

. >> "zero to one," what does that mean? >> it means doing something that we have never done before. if we are going to take our society to a new level, it will require new things. >> what companies have taking us there? >> facebook, apple. >> yet you argue for the last few decades, we have been in a tech slowdown. have facebook and apple not been innovative enough? >> as a society, i would argue we have not done as much as we could have. there are not as many innovations in energy and biotechnology, and not as many as we would like, transportation, it is not moving any faster. >> one thing you would learn from entrepreneurs is don't copy mark zuckerberg and bill gates, why not? >> mark zuckerberg wanted to start a social networking site, bill gates wanted to start an operating system, and so in some sense you cannot copy them because they did not copy somebody else. >> you also suggest that they come up with one very important truth that very few people agree with you on. >> i think great companies, they have a sense of mission. they have a

we had no authority to do them. hey assumed unicorns would exist and you have to work through those things and suck the hope out of them where there is no hope and expose people to their infirmities. >> so talk a little bit about the toll this took on your life and on your family. what was it like to have the daily show visit your house? >> "the daily show," they had a lot of fun with me. [laughing] i think the president said in the off val office and said in morning meetings on the economy, really terrible and i remember him coming to the oval office one morning, saying seriously, like the second time you're on "saturday night live." it was knot very good.ple i had great people around me and very supportive president. it was not so fun for me sometimes but very hard on your families. liked not families of people tt served in the military or in the fire department orir first-responders but it is still hard because they have no privacy and they never see you.e when you're around you're not there. when you're present y

to be. good idea? bad idea? dou want to fight along someone that has to be there because a number came up? >> it is solved -- as a member of the department of defense and running a military nonprofit i can tell you we in the private sector do a lot better job spending a dollar. that is my experience. and that when it comes to this issue, i mean in this war, how many of you went out and bought a war bond? hoch of it came out of your check book? how much did you feel from this? the answers are not a lot. maybe that is our goal i don't think the military needs a draft to be successful. >> let's than 1% of the american public will serve in the military, we're fighting wars with what my good friend says are other peoples' kids. do we understand fully what we're asking them to do? when he go? i wish we can keep just that topic. but public service, something to think about. you just graduated college, ready to move on. find a job, get a place to live, go out in the world but there is something dragging you down like cemen

got sent here to do things. let's have the public debates and let's try to move them forward. >> what's changed that? the money? the polling? cable television? changed the fear of debating issues? sort of the way media has changed. so misstatement now can be dispositive of an election or an issue. there was less of that when i got started 24 years ago. it didn't mean if you didn't wasn't awful, it but now, i think sort of the short video piece that can be a fewer the world in seconds, i think that does ofibit the ability to sort engage in public debate sometimes. i think town meetings have changed dramatically. they're not as sort of open and activists thatof come to those now. i think that's why a lot of the telephone town hall meetings, those truly are get on the happen to phone, it's very much more a real cross-section of what people are thinking. there's been a lot of changes. i think probably, you know, make that -- the other change is really not about the committees, needs tonk congress assert its role more

you got to trust the process. i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. thanks for your business. this is "the profit." surfside beach is a picturesque resort town. a great place to vacation and a great place to call home. anthony leggio... [ camera shutter clicks ] ...and his girlfriend, kristen christian... kristen: good morning, asl signs. lemonis: ...moved here from long island two years ago to start a family... anthony: i know, you want daddy time. lemonis: ...and a business -- asl signs. anthony: do you want to finish doing this estimate? kristen: oh, yes, please. anthony: oh, boy. here we go. lemonis: with a $200,000 loan from his dad, louis, anthony was able to get the sign shop up and running quickly. he's got expensive machinery to make the signs, and the trucks to install them. in their second year of operations, asl generated $300,000 in sales and made a $45,000 profit. anthony: come on. come on, get some work done. lemonis: but anthony wants more. -much more. -anthony: i want to go big. that's why i'm here. to make money. lots of it. lemonis:

they were likely have to appeal. do you? you don't. >> it doesn't even make sense politically at this point. >> one of the interesting things that you mentioned in the book is constantly having to revise sections of the book like we have a chapter on shootings in the nra. >> the gun massacre was hard to keep up to date and was depressing that the same thing in the same-sex marriage for the buck in a good way. a lot of specialties. a couple of the states have rules that the ban is unconstitutional. so, yes, the chapter sadly right up until last minute i was editing -- >> i think we are the real victims. there was like a good 30 seconds there. but it's kind of funny. so, there is also, you know, just certain -- they are only as left as you can go. what the right does really well is they will frame moderate liberalism as extremism. if barack obama put in place universal health care, he would have been called a socialist. succumb. his account is put together this compromise is still a giveaway. what was it called? a socialist. yo

what was i doing prior to my arrest? uniting hackers and activists from around the world, correct? after my arrest, i am doing the same exact thing. unfortunately, now, there is logs. that is the part that hurt the most. >> tell me about jeremy hammond. >> he is an interesting character, not as they portrayed him to be. he was just a random activist who had some hacking skills, and he wanted to be part of lulzsec, just like many of the hackers. unfortunately, lulzsec was only a team of six, but he hung around with us. once lulzsec met its end, he participated with operation anti-security. >> you know what some of them are saying, they are saying you coerced them. >> that is kind of difficult. that bothers me a little bit. i would say, what are you doing? let's share that information on twitter. you are telling me that i coerced them, what was i doing before? nothing has changed. i did not change from what i was doing prior. so, no, there was no coercion. i participated. we worked together. the same as everybody else. >> p

nothing to do with movie making. what they say about it when they talk about it, what they want to say about it is articulate and-- i'm knocked out by what they say about it, and what they want to tell you about it. >> rose: so what is that. >> i think alejandro found, i think when are you as courageous as he was in making this movie that he-- that you can't, you can't-- you can't not be-- you can hate this movie but you're going talk about this movie. he just said i'm going after this, i'm going to tell the truth about in a clever way how life is, how you feel and not be coy about it an i think it makes people, they're not used to that and once you hit that, like when you go into somebody's brain, you can-- you know, you can hit a little thing it kind of hits this thing. and makes it react to it. just simple humanity, nicole-- nicholson, i called him and said would you come see this movie of mine. and afterwards he looked at me. and what did he say, masterful. i'm glad you made this, keats because now i don't have to

and they had to do that, too. ey don't understand that -- motown may not be able to be here tomorrow morning or monday morning, whatever. he says you know you should come to the show because they're all coming back to honor you. they're all coming back. and suzanne has put this thing together, and you had said you're not coming. and the fact that they came from wherever they were in europe, here back to celebrate you, and you -- i'm not coming. and so i think you're wrong. >> how did you come to terms with eventually selling the label? if you have separation anxiety with artists, i can only imagine that gets heightened and you finally decide that the time is now to sell this empire that you have built. how did you come to peace with the selling of motown years later? then we'll come back to "motown 25." >> because of the times. >> we had to do great work and feel the pulse of the people who we loved and loved us. in the meantime, business is business. and when you can see the future i realized that technology is mo

we have much more work to do. however, any decrease in prevelance indicates that there are fewer victims of this horrible crime and i think we all would agree that is a step in the right direction. we will continue to monitor and publicize our progress. we are not satisfied and recognize that future progress will be defined by continued decreases in prevalence of sexual assault. it is our intention to continue prevention work as broadly and as creatively as bobble so as to reach our goal of eliminating sexual assault from the military. our focus is truly on reinforcing a climate where sexual assault is seen as acceptable not just because it's illegal but because it is counter to our correspondence values. at this point, i'll be joined by the department's highly qualified expert dr. nate gal barth who i'm very fortunate to have as my partner in this effort and we'll be happy to take your questions. lolita? >> two things. one on the retaliation you've all addressed that quite a bit, but obviously, last year's 50% spi

right now, what you have to do to get to the people, they start they have awakened the -- ed host: doant to respond? guest: look, i was on the forefront of the tea party movement. the modern-day republican party, i think it is a movement out of love, love for country. it really started overspending and health care. we have fought about since the beginning of our republic. much. isis something our -- it something we will fight over, so long after brad and i are ashes to ashes, dust to dust. guest: is something we will fight over, tt protesting when president bush was expanding medicare. guest: a lot of people process and over that. guest: when he spent trillions of dollars on a war in iraq he started under false the tenses -- look. guest: [indiscernible] the tea party was a creation of the insurance company, [indiscernible] guest: timeout. timeout. guest: that is crazy. why do you insult -- guest: i am not insulting him. is, theirsaying history is not spontaneous. spontaneously, when people start casey showed up in raleigh, to get on bus and go to washington dc. he set up invitations a

i'm going to do what i can do. i would like to deal with you but if not i'm going to do it.ed on the immigration question is while people -- while people oppose what he did on immigration, a lot more people believe, including people who support the policy, believe he doesn't have the right to do this and the republicans in congress have done a very poor job of laying that narrative out, which is whether you're being lawful. the president is angry and doesn't want to be seen as irrelevant and i'm not letting them do the show. i'm going to do it. and i believe we're headed for much more confrontation. >> in the meantime, enjoy your beautiful grandchildren. >> my grandchildren are here. >> they're back there they're beautiful. you wanted to take them to the museum. >> they want to go christmas shopping to toys 'r' us, american girl, the whole bit. that's -- i'm going to -- >> see you there. bring a camera following you around. >> merry christmas. >> have a great christmas, you have a great grandfather. very smart. very smart. okay. >> good. >> we're certainly not rushing to kic

i'm not going to discuss that today. doe this move as yet done by unilateral move the present wwithout speaking to the congress? with regard to the acts, i would say that i would can see have many of the changes been made today fall within the purview of the presidency. my comments are based on the fact that these are unwise decisions. the fact that i now know, for fundamental truth, that this will make the day when democracy comes to cuba even further away. they are going to utilize these to create more wealth, more funding for their oppressive regime. in a few years, you're going to see them here in the halls of congress to lobby. i saw that this week when we and pass a bill that supported democracy protesters in hong kong. my office is getting phone do ls from companies that business in china asking us to back off. you are going to see that here now, too. was released from prison and that, of course, goes hand-in-hand with the change in policy. would you have rather seen him remain imprisoned? >> according to the white n