in this part of california, northern california in particular, i've been adjacent to san jose, et cetera. submission santa clara was the eighth at one omissions a stop in northern california between 1777-1823, early 1800s. and another interesting note is that it was the first of four missions of his 21 mission system to be named for a woman,, st. clair of the cc. as i mentioned to say, the mission church on campus continue to serve as the local parish church for the people of santa clara and actually was until 1852 that the town of santa clara was actually incorporate as its own entity hereby. so the university and the town of santa clara grew up in, came to a together. they talk about history of one without talk about the history of the other. the jesuits overall would have been somewhat using maybe not so much the manuscript material but in addition to the handwritten letter that we have as part of this collection they also inherited probably about 250 of the nations library books as well pick many of them are probably largely on theology, but some of them also reflected missions and t

and around the world, commercial buildings, residential buildings, wineries, et cetera, et cetera andave an amazing portfolio, we focus on the very high-end of the market, five-star space and it's been fantastic and we have an amazing company and we have quite frankly an amazing brand. a brand that stands for quality, luxury, iconic properties but, you know, it's changed. in the light of politics we said, we are not going expand anymore internationally, we are not going to do any new international projects. that was a big piece of what we did, what i did and don did and ivanka when she was in the company. it's also the right thing to do. maria: how do you identify what the next growth spot is? >> i think it's gut, intuition and factors that go into it and you see places that are reducing taxes, they're trying to incentivize businesses to come in and those are always the place that is do immensely well. look at florida. florida is a perfectly example. look how well the state has done. why have they have done? they have low taxes an incredible quality of life. real estate prices were as

massively costly in terms of losses, et ut, job cetera. is what we're avoid. to >>> again, there's increased cost associated with that. if you look at the right column and multiply this ogether, society is on a net benefit far better off avoiding these terrible financial crises. you 'm going to walk through what these are. we're going to get to the discussion. we substantially increase the common equity banks to 22.5 e gdp. step two, we force the treasury department to certify that the $250 billion and up, are no longer too big to fail. i can tell you this, the not going cretary is to want to certify that. because if he or she certifies and then that bank gets into trouble and they have to bail it out there's a lot of egg secretary's ury face. that's by design. we want them to be reluctant to certification and if they refuse to certify, we automatically increase the requirements of those banks up to 38%. this will leave most big banks restructure themselves. step three, a big concern was if increased capital of the biggest banks, all the activity ill just move

, et cetera, things like that, which is important.nne semingson locally is kind of moving ahead and pushing hard on that issue. it is interesting that one of the earliest states that had a u.s. senator was maine -- margaret chase smith, right? back in the late '40s, '50s. and so, you wonder if it's somehow when there's an urbanized environment, as there are in pennsylvanias of the world, versus a more rural, kind of less of an organizational structure around politics, it gives more of an opportunity for women to lead through the process. >> again, you know, i disagree. women have been discriminated throughout the world, and including here. if you look at the pay rate and equal pay, they still only get 79 cents on a dollar for the same job that the men do. there was a study done that, at that rate, it would take at least to the year 2021 for a white woman to succeed. it would take for african americans 2022, and for latinas 2023. so, it is a discriminatory factor that exists, and as a result, if you don't have economic power, you know

and it's possible now with technology and advanced data algorithms, et cetera, to get a sense real-time where voters are. their likelihood of supporting your candidate or opponent and elected it to go. you put those data points together and have a general picture of how the election is

hanging in the balance a health care bill will determine whether he can pass things like tax reform, et cetera. i think he doesn't play long game very well whene is emotionally and intellectually invested in something and he is doing that now for a decision that will take time. >> health care is another huge story we have to get to. >>> still ahead on "morning joe," senator rand paul and congressman mark meadows will join us. they are leading the push against their own party's plan to replace obamacare. the biggest cutbacks to the federal program since the draw down after world war ii is how "the washington post" describes the white house budget proposal which is out today. white house budget director mick

, et cetera, all of that has now been introduced as well. and i think that he continues to meet with members and walk away with a very, very optimistic view of where the bill is headed. i think a lot of the measures that have been changed and tweaked and updated have assuaged members who had concerns or wanted to see some additional tightening. keep in mind if you are a conservative who has been fighting for repeal and replace, this is your chance. fur a conservative who has been looking to address out of control entitlement spending, this is the first attempt -- this is the first reform of an entitlement program in terms of medicaid in 30 years. these are a truly conservative set of principles that we are fighting for. the competition that's in the bill. the ability to allow prices to come down and choice to go up, there is nothing more conservative that is in this bill. i think as members continue to talk about ideas that have been included in the bill and the principles of it we feel good going into the final stretch. >> may he seek more

she never would explain to me that color, et cetera, et cetera. and then she did tell me what it meant and she said, that'll change, that'll change but you just do what you have to do. >> what was that first experience like stepping into politics? >> well, i was never encouraged by the leadership in the -- in the black community, not the leadership but the people and i found it very interesting because i was running in the city at large, they never had a member of the senate since the short period of reconstruction and i was the first person to be elected to the state senate since that short period and it wasn't lonely because i'm not stand-off person and i was able to form friendships in the senate pretty quickly and to -- i didn't understand politics. i didn't know that much about it. as a matter of fact, i knew nothing and i found out how little i knew when i got there and i said, wow, but i was very lucky to be able to have formed some of the friendships. i had a friend of mine from virginia, he was a senator, the slave revolt took place, he s

et cetera. juno at a mean?look beyond officialfigures. i you always have to look beyond official figures. i aways look at electricity. if you look at their electricity. if you look at their electricity production figures, electricity production figures, electricity usage, that is probably under 6.5%. 6.5% is probably bowing to reality. francois fillon. he reminds me of margaret thatcher. if you remember when she was having a leadership crisis, she thought on. of course she was not able to do that. —— fight on. he is tragic tough it out and knows that the republican party wants to move against him and they are meeting today. it is very hard now. the person that may well stand in a lane she pay, doesn't seem very keen. person that may well stand in a lane she pay, doesn't seem very keenlj think he knows there is a slim chat he could win the election. —— elayne .itis he could win the election. —— elayne . it is not left and right in terms of the main political parties. you have two outside our contenders who are t

, et cetera. is the white house backing away from some of the more sweeping changes of nafta that the president proposed during the campaign? >> i would argue that robert isn't nominated yet. that's not a statement of administration policy at this point. there's nothing that -- in those document that is we are confirming or in that report, rather, that we are confirming. that is not a statement of administration policy. that is not accurate academy aassessment of where we are at this time and i think our goal is to get robert lighthiser appointed as embassador and trade representative and when we have that, we will have plenty of updates with respect where we go to nafta and the trade agreement. with that, i am going to say good-bye and see you tomorrow. >> first one is maybe republicans were critical about president obama had handled the revolution, is this something that -- wasn't -- what does the administration feel the role should be regarding that? >> that's a hypothetical question. i know, w

he is a shareholder in s corporations, et cetera, et cetera. he has to fill out how many pay forms under that schedule? >> would the gentleman yield? >> no, i am not going to yield. not today. not today. this is too serious. he has to file, perhaps some schedule c. and et cetera, et cetera. the two pages that we received and the public received are a joke. you know it and i know it. we're not a joke. i take everybody on this committee seriously. i know you have the best of intentions. but for you to accuse me of doing this for political reasons, you are 110% wrong. we also know that mr. trump said that trump organization saw money this is what he said, not me, pouring in from russia and that russians make a pretty disproportionate cross section of a lot of our assets. we know they tried to develop real estate in russia. not unlike what they did in china. we'll get to that. we have plenty of time. >> thank you. the gentleman's time has expired. >> mr. kelly, you are recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. from my experience has been and i've als

, et cetera. we have seen one i mpediment after another. that's got to end. whether or not the senate is capable of doing that or not, given these road blocks that the white house is putting in front of them, very doubtful. >> we hope so. you said doubtful. we hope so. it seems to be playing out, the investigation in the media, for the most part. in that clip, chairman burr wants to see where the investigation goes. what do you make of that? >> well, of course that's the way that it should go and i think we're all saying, look at the senate, they're the adults in the room as compared to what's happening in the house with congressman nunes. that's a pretty low bar. i'm not confident this will lead to a better result. i think this should be handled like a 9/11 commission-style inquiry because even with senator burr saying all the right things, remember, he had gotten into some trouble earlier because of the accusation about the relationship between the trump team and russia and he is somebody who wa

on crafting legislation to repeal and replace the affordable care act also known as obamacare, et cetera. this is something they will also have to contend with. i can tell you, frederica, on monday, when there is a press briefing and ask specifically for what evidence that there is to support this. this is something the president appears to be tweeting and the staff will have to respond to after the fact as opposed to tweeting actual facts. >> huthank you so much. appreciate that. so now a spokesman for former president barack obama calling those accusations, quote, simply false. live from west palm beach, athena jones, what more is the president saying about these very serious accusations that, again, were made without donald trump revealing evidence? >> reporter: hi, without any proof of any sort. this is a statement from the president, the former president's spokesperson and a cardinal rule of the obama administration was that no one house official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the department of justice. as part of that practice, neither president obama nor

, et cetera. and then it's up to those members to decide what to do with that information, how to explore that more in-depth. >> so ultimately, in their questioning, they could actually wind up getting if they did and asked certain questions, just sitting in the intelligence meetings, like the president does, digging, if he decides to dig more, he'll get more? >> it depends. i think that's possible. i don't want to prejudge what they ask and what comes in response to it. it also has to do with what documents we have. they may go down a particular trail and have to follow up with an agency and say, we saw this. can we see a follow-up on that. as you saw from media reports, the nsa has been asked to provide documents to the house. my understanding is that that was ongoing and some of the materials that they see prompt them to ask additional questions. but that's part of providing it to them. it's an ongoing review. and what we want is for them to see these materials and come to conclusions or need m

. >> we're looking at water recycling, expanding ground water, et cetera, et cetera. but water conservization a baseline plan. >> hopeful but skeptical. >> i don't think we can the count on a weather pattern leaving or returning. so to call something off is not being careful. >> now, water officials we talk to say even if the government declares the drought over, they say he will push to keep the conservation movement going. it is a question of whether people will listen to that part. robert handa, nbc bay area news. >> thank you. some folks who lost their homes when the creek overflowed have gotten moved out of their temporary shelter. this is the shelter if san jose. about 60 peep are still living there. they got word it will be closed on april 10. they are working on a new place to house the evacuees. our micro climate weather alert coverage continues in about ten minutes. >>> people don't realize how good the bill was. >> president trump, the self-proclaimed negotiator, was more of an apprentice today. he said he's learned a lot in the last 24 hours. today the muc

how long are these floor et cetera going to be in that 24 degree temperature. hard to say. i was looking at our "fox5" warm app and listening to our folks and there will be several hours of 24 degree temperatures and the question becomes, how many hours does it take for the blossoms and these little buds to be severely affected. we don't know at this point and everybody is hoping for the best and cherry blossom festival begins today and performances scheduled this afternoon for the welcome stapling. hopefully we get information later on and i know everyone is hoping for good news when it comes to these beautiful mroomz. that is the latest from here at the tidal basin. i'm melanie alnwick. let's accepted it back to you guys. >> thanks, mel, 4:31 you can track weather 24/presidential download the fox news and weather app search d.c. news and weather in the app store both apps are free. >> time 4:1 looking at the this morning's big stories one day before trump's revised travel ban is supposed to take effect several federal courtrooms across the country will today hear argument

f-35 and the mb-22 and et cetera. camelot is going forward requesting of the secretary of the navy and authority to pay a retention bonus in three communities. f-35, f-18 because the legacy platform are the most challenged platforms right now. and b-22. f-35 and b-22 are the most growing communities. we don't want to be caught short in those communities. we're a bit imbalanced. we got more majors than and lieutenants that are preferred. and so we want to make sure we have the opportunity to leverage to maintain those young officers as they come out of their required commitment to us and capture them for that extra bit of time before we got them by the -- >> thank you, general. >> miss speire, you are now recognized. >> thank you. >> thank you all for your service to our country. general grosso, the $35,000 bonus, i'm presuming that's not going to be a check that's presented to the airman on day one? >> that is correct, man, aviators in the air force have a ten-year pilot service commitment. that is when they graduate

other than make it chaotic et cetera.urning into really a mess -- >> i was wondering -- >> donald trump wanted. >> go ahead. >> you know this ambassador don't you? >> pretty much. as much as -- i've met him many times. socially, directly, interviews, et cetera. yes. >> what did you think of him? easy i to forget him? >> you know, i don't think so. yes. you might say he's rumpled, you know, gray hair, yeah. i suppose people might say that. but then they said that about putin too. but i think he is an experienced diplomat. he used to be the deputy foreign minister of russia. representative to nato. now is he a spy? probably what you want to ask. i don't think -- let's define spy, but i do not think that the russian ambassador is running around putting microphones in people's bedrooms in washington, d.c. i mean his job -- there are people in the embassy who do that. his job is to collect information. so that information, who did you have lunch with, what did they say? what did they say in passing? mr. sessions mentioned lot

you have got jason chafe, et cetera, and now senator portman.ho are some of the other defectors who are now saying that he should recuse himself. >> reporter: those are what i would say are the two major cracks in find of republican unity here around this issue. jason chafe, et cetera, i talked to him earlier. he said yes he needs to recuse him. the problem he has is of course the contradictory testimony, not necessarily the meeting with the ambassador itself. that meeting is not necessarily out of the ordinary. but the fact that he contradicted himself, said that the meeting never happened, and then didn't correct the record. that's why chafe, et cetera thinks he should recuse himself at this point. that is a split from where leadership appears to be coming down. house speaker paul ryan saying if the justice department is investigating jeff sessions of course sessions should recuse himself but there is no need in the context of the broader investigation into trump campaign contacts with russia. then you have kevin mccarthy who on morning joe th

donald trump said it was nefarious, terrible, sat, et cetera, et cetera. what was it?p. maybe nothing happened at all, but the fact that donald trump represented it in such a terrible way, that's how we keep getting into these problems. >> you i'm guessing it's going to hurt the idea of the house intelligence committee conducting this investigation. >> you know, it is shocking to see politics taking place in the house of representatives, i know. but, you know, he is a politician and he's running this investigation and he is a trump loyalist. and he's acting that way, which certainly compromises his role as the nominally independent leader of a -- >> he says he's not acting that way. he was one of the first republicans to say there was no truth to the allegation that obama had wiretapped trump at trump tower. and he repeated that again today. >> look, certainly the hearing itself left you with the impression that not only the chairman, but all the republicans on the committee were more focused on kind of a defense attorney rome than fact finding role. so, i think there

, et cetera, somebody was in an accident, we all pay for it. and because the only way that it's going to work where you know, we can have a productive-- let me have the right ray -- way to say it we all share the risk. >> you're basically saying the government has to provide a single payer system for catastrophic health care. >> and even less than catastrophic health care, for chronic illnesses and serious injury as well. so, the answer is yes, single payer for those. everything else can be absolutely free market. >> how does it go in the budget? where is the pay for it? that's quite a program. >> it's a great question. right now we're paying for it taxes. one thing i would change, i would take the insurance companies out of the equation completely. i don't know, in the health care, whether it's obamacare, whether it's trump care, or don't care, whatever you want to call it, i don't think the insurance companies solve any problems or actually deserve to be in the mix and so, we're already paying into insurance companies, we're already paying fo

, et cetera. seems to me a lot of information is out there about the symbiotic relationship between trump and the russians. what do you know more, or can you hint at where you think this story's going? >> you know, chris, insaid very clearly as have others on this committee, we need to get to the bottom of one question. did any americans conspire with the russians who interfered with our 2016 presidential election? and specifically, did anyone associated with the trump campaign help those who interfered with the 2016 presidential election? when we keep seeing more and more connections between trump advisers, at least coming out in reports, these trump advisers and the russians. and so, of course, this just speaks to how important the investigation is. >> well, doesn't the -- i mean, my experience over the years is the fbi, as part of our counterintelligence effort in this country, which all other countries have, they have all kinds of electronic wiretaps and information like, electronic communicat

can i renew my guest worker status, et cetera. there are many folks in agriculture and tourism, for example, who want a consistent stable work force over time. so i wonder if some of those things that would ensure that guest workers are indeed temporary might actually cut against some of these civil liberties concerns. >> yes. canada does have their own kind of idea about how to regulate it. i think there is probably a solution in incentivizing people to leave and return to their home country, then come back to work. >> paying people to leave? >> or do a wage withholding process whereby they can get a portion of their wages as long as they leave. there are a couple solutions out there that kind of make sense. but getting back to this idea of immigration, yes, welfare, no, it's kind of a political nonstarter. we are never going to get rid of all our social safety net programs no matter how much everybody hates it or loves it or is somewhere in the middle. but what we really need to do is enforce the laws that we have on the books.

she never would explain to me that color, et cetera, et cetera. and then she did tell me what it meant and she said, that'll change, that'll change but you just do what you have to do. >> what was that first experience like stepping into politics? >> well, i was never encouraged by the leadership in the -- in the black community, not the leadership but the people and i found it very interesting because i was running in the city at large, they never had a member of the senate since the short period of reconstruction and i was the first person to be elected to the state senate since that short period and it wasn't lonely because i'm not stand-off person and i was able to form friendships in the senate pretty quickly and to -- i didn't understand politics. i didn't know that much about it. as a matter of fact, i knew nothing and i found out how little i knew when i got there and i said, wow, but i was very lucky to be able to have formed some of the friendships. i had a friend of mine from virginia, he was a senator, the slave revolt took place, he s

what is your group doing behind the scenes on social media, et cetera, to get the senators to oppose him, the senators that you would like to oppose him? >> last week will launch a new campaign called millions for roe. you can start or join a state-based team to engage in civic engagement about this issue but also about other issues that are a threat to abortion rights. so gorsuch is our first action but there will be more we will be out here in d.c. but also in the states fighting all anti-choice nominees. >> what do you plan to do when you get into the hearing room today? will you sit and listen or do you plan to protest? >> i think it's important to sit and listen and see what he has to say and make sure that the senators ask certain questions. we really need to expose his record as i don't think that protesting inside is as valuable, because really need to hear what he has to say and we need to be able to get them on the record on what his ideas are in terms of our ritualism. original as it is fighting because of course women were not in the constitution or pot of when the consti

you know, usual stuff, dummy, overrated, why he is on the air et cetera. but this up with is the best. in the middle of the night. i imagine him in his gold-threaded pajamas. and he tweeted, about three weeks earlier my publisher had put my book out in paper book and tweeted out, about the event. so trump tweeted things that matter by charles krauthammer now out in paper back. book sucks. shortest review i ever got. i was so charmed that i read it on the air the next night. and i told my publisher that when we have another edition, of my book, i want it wipe the back cover clean, take off all the blurbs, and i want one blurb, book sucks, donald j. trump p.t back cover clean, take off all the blurbs, and i want one blurb, book sucks, donald j. trump p.cover clean, take off a blurbs, and i want one blurb, book sucks, donald j. trump p. my most optimistic assessment is that. my most optimistic assessment is that trump -- the way things are now, i think rich had it right. we have a populist in the white house and conservatives running the congress. so my most

you have to have a strong country, et cetera, if you're going to beat out other countries. rich above the poor. well, they're disciplined, they deserved it. employers above employees. they're rich enough to be employers. you have western culture above nonwestern culture. adults above children. and 21 states, teachers and coaches can beat children with sticks if they don't just show them respect all the time. you have america above other countries. america first because we're better. you have men above women. whites above nonwhites. christians above non-christians. straights above gays. that is that moral hierarchy because it says who has won out. that moral hierarchy defines virtually all radical republican positions on every issue. it's one issue, it's not whether someone is homophobic or not whether someone is a racist or a sexist or -- you know, islamophobic. it's all of them together. they fit together seamlessly. that is what is behind the kind of america and americans who vote for trump. and it's a very powerful kind of thing. >> if i take everything that you've just

you look at someone's face the page, et cetera? >> guest: depends on the campaign and the level of sophistication. the more advanced levels, it's possible to use a very long list of data points to analyze activity and marketing information. these trends go all the way back to micro-targeting. you can now tank of the decade was the amount of sophistication creating the marketplace now available to campaigns. there's always kind of the space race between the democrats and republicans over who's got the edge over these kinds of tools and that will continue for some time. at times they had the edge and it's really about how can i put data points together? a more accurate picture of where they are. the primary data point is the first person contact. just leveraging all the data you gather in the campaign and all the call centers, all the doorknocking, the online surveys and the rest and using the data in a centralized way and layering on top of that and analytical way to say if this is true for them, other data points available to you,

et cetera? they feel they're in it to win it. who knows what will come up. who knows whether there's a smoking gun. who knows what the questioning will be at the hearings. who knows whether eight democrats will not go along with say -- who knows whether they won't get the filibuster out of the democratic party? so, you know, they're just going to go to the mat. the truth is, if they did the opposite and preserved the filibuster and you get to a situation down the road where it's president trump or republican president replacing a ginsburg or a briar or a kennedy, mcconnell can get rid of the filibuster then if he can't get over 60 votes. they might as well go to the mat this time, i think is what she's saying. >> now, this is a c-span audience, so they know the cabinet really well. what would the implications be? nan aron suggested that if leader mcconnell invokes the nuclear option for supreme court nominees -- now the democratic leader had earlier invoked it for lower nominations. butbut she s

, et cetera. he wants flynn to tell his story. that's interesting. >> yeah. i don't know how much to make out of the tweet. it's sort of more evidence that, at least the president himself is not the inner circle just aren't taking this seriously. every aspect of it is at best sloppy, at worst signs of a coverup or collusion. i think paul is absolutely right that this is big news about flynn. he is the first person in the inner circle who is suggesting that he's going to turn his back on them. what we don't know is the substance of the proffer. it may be nothing. it may not satisfy what either committees or the fbi want to hear or need to hear to get an investigation. and for all we know, flynn is the one who they're focussing on, right? >> right. >> so we don't know how far up this goes. so it is significant. but we just don't know. we don't yet know how to read the fact that the proffer has not been accepted. is it just a matter of timing? or is it that he hasn't offered anything? but as for the

some in the archives '4hundred pages long, 800 pages long simple talk about indian slaves, et cetera, faceless, nameless, but when you get into this you really get into the nitty-gritty of juan and pedro and how they were living in the houses of the owners and what way they were doing exactly, et cetera. so, all of that to say it seems to me remarkable that the spanish legal system was so advanced in that way. my final comment of that is that while it worked in spain and these legal system eventually stamped out slavery in the iberian peninsula, in the 1st -- 17th century. in the case of the new world that as impossible because the economy rested on the shoulder offed indian labor, so that dictum led to convoluted and covert actions. >> if you're interested in the two legal cases they're rich that give voices to people that otherwise may seem voiceless, and as far as the united states is concerned, there are numerous freedom suits, and where you will usually find them is in either a federal district court archives or in some of the state, lower level courts archives and everybody here

massively costly in terms of reduced output and job losses et cetera. so 158% of gdp, that's what we're trying to avoid. you're willing to spend a fair bit of money if you can avoid one ever those outcomes. what are we doing in the minneapolis plan? step one of our plan, we cut the chance of a future bailout down to 39%. a big reduction in risk. but as you can see the total cost does go up. safety is not free. 24% there's a net benefit society is better off by 19% of gdp if you look at the right column. finally in step two of our plan we cut it down to as low as 9% chance of a future crisis again there's increased cost associated with that but if you look at the right column you multiply this all together and society is on a net benefit far better off avoiding these terrible financial crises. and i'm going to walk you through what these are and we'll get to the discussion. step one, we substantially increase the common equity capital of large banks to 23.5% of gdp. current regulations are less than 13%, we're being generous but for point of comparison y

. >> josh, let's just take a look if we could at the number of trump aides, sociabiliassociate cetera, the possible connections to russia whether it's banks, meetings with the russian ambassador or something else, commitments made, you know, and it's quite extraordinary and we're talking about four, maybe even five committees on capitol hill that have investigations ongoing surrounding trump and any ties to russia and other things. so how does this president kind of rise above all these, you know, possible pivotal changes that could happen starting this week with some of these hearings? >> sure. well, i think what the white house has done is specifically reject all of the accusations and investigations at hand. i think a smart strategy would be for them to divide them into two baskets, right. there's one which is russian interference with the american political system for which there's a ton of evidence that the 17 intelligence agencies publicly stated they believe it did happen and i slightly disagree with nick on this. i don't think that the chief russian goal was to seek a better r

the food chain in term of production, it no longer wants to make toys it wants to make iphones, et cetera. additionally to spend money on automation because they don't have robotics because they don't have a labor force anymore. these challenges are what they are facing. china has attempted to write the balance they've dropped the one child policy and it's a two child policy. but if you know chinese they don't like having many babies because it's so excessive to have a kid in china. to raise him or her, sent him to a public special school, and the high school examinations and the ultimate issue is helping them buy an apartment. men with apartments don't make attractive potential spouses without an apartment. giving the real estate market in china is a huge pressure on the chinese family. hoping the two child policy will get the mogul room and this will be a blind alley for them. i look at demographics as being a key and crucial problem they're facing. demographics in america say that china will become the first country that grows old before it gets rich. >> are demographic for our country

. >> when it comes to healthcare and how that might affect taxes, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. >>en going to see a vote on the obamacare repeal today is the big question. if it doesn't pass what does this do to the trump agenda going forward. this was the reason why two days ago we had that major selloff. yesterday thanks to a rally in technology shares, the market didn't crater. it stabilized the dow fell six. investors confused and troubled by what's going on in and washington at the moment. >> interesting we talk about the advertising because we know advertising is a billion dollar industry. >> reporter: yeah. >> when you look at these big players here, the youtubes, googles, i have to admit i would be upset if i knew my ads were running next to content that i didn't approve. >> reporter: hate content, terror content, isis propaganda, this is why many huge advertisers we're talking verizon, at&t, johnson and johnson, they are pulling their ads from google and its youtube video service because they don't want their ads placed next to this content. what is google doing about it?

we have important technologies and our platform, java, the oracle database and et cetera -- and that'sh of the success in our platform business -- our infrastructure business will do two things. first, it's going to be in a great position to run the oracle database. it has millions of applications running on it. our customers have hundreds and hundreds of thousands of oracle databases. so that becomes a huge differentiator for us. in addition, once we bring those oracle workloads, there are so many, josh, other workloads associated with the oracle workload, and we can run those better than anybody else in the world, bar none. >> hi, mark. it's jon fort here in new york. congratulations on the quarter, particularly the cloud. i've seen you make this pitch, the hotel metaphor and all of that, and part of the pitch is, you can run applications more efficiently than customers can because they don't need all of these bodies in i.t. anymore if they turn this over to you. now that your cloud business is ramping, how long before we start to see massive workforce reductions in i.t. with cloud t

i'm a lawyer and studied the constitution and worked on capitol hill, et cetera. so, yes, i probably have a better understanding as do you because your an attorney in government. we're nerd us but i wanted to break this down for people so they understood that your kids have to know about their country and their government. and to the republican for which it stands, we take a pledge, right? our money says certain things on it. in god we trust. the spiel. there are symbols and thinks in our founders put forth that have stayed with us for 240 years. there's no other country on earth, michael, that is still a republican, standing the way we. rome was the last great republic and we know what happened to rome. but i think that this notion of the separate of powers and being vigilant. paul revere talking about i -- i have heroes in every chapter and the reason i brought people into the book is i want mid fellow americans to connect with this notion of who and what made this country great. i don't think the country needs to be made great again itch thinks it's still great

>> both sides discussed locations and topics and being length, et cetera, for aspect of the trip and this is what we both. a few things. he's spoken on the phone with him a few times. we have big things, trade to north korea. there are issues of security to be addressed, and i think there will abe lot of that on the table over the two days they talk. >> they are expecting the white house to be frapd. >> kind of to put a floor under the relation shim. the rebalance and hit it in the prior administration. ma many. if you have any hash tags, let me know. but i think right now we're sfrnlt about egs ploegs rather than come patriots sfchlt. >> is there anyone in the white house or national security team to try to find information about wiretapping? >> i'm not aware of anything directly. i would have to look into that in terms of -- again, there's two sides of this. one is the information side and two is the policy and the activities and the legal piece of what happened. and those are big buckets, if you will. >> so it's possible? >> i'm not going to comment on it. >> don't the daily quest