and not only that, he's the greatest hubert humphrey. i know that guy when i watched you. know that guy, it is bradley winfr winfrey. you got the next several minutes. >> i agree with rob. i would call it a audacity of dope. >> it is an odd speech calling for unity with devisive agenda. i am telling you -- if i was a brand consultant and working with republicans, look, i don't know why you have these two things but you do. you have god and the flag and this guy is going to destroy both of those things for you because he's invert ing in a proverse way of great american values and the institutions we need and the press and the courts and he, i think has, i was working in chicago and a teen said to me, he said that donald trump groomed vulnerable americans like -- saying what do you want to hear and here he comes out and says i am going to cut your taxes and we'll have big infrastructure and trillion dollars investment and we are going to increase our defense budget and it does not add up. >> want some candy money. >> yeah, thank you. we have our term supporter best known for

and not only that he was the greatest hubert humphrey since hubert humphrey. and i am serious.know that guy, i know that guy from somewhere. i was watching and i go it's bradley whitford. what did you make this speech? >> i agree with rob reiner. we are living in some bad writing. i would call it the audacity of don' dope. >> you mean not smart. >> yes, it is a call for unity with a totally divisive agenda. it is really offensive to me this vilifying of immigrants, the conflags of refugees with terrorists. i'm telling you if i was a brand consultant, custom i am nwhich . and i was working with republicans, i would say look, i don't know why you have these two things, but you do. you have god and the flag. and this guy is going to destroy both of those things for you. because he's inverting in a very perverse way, i think, our great american values, the institutions we need, the press, the courts. and he, i think, has -- i was working in chicago, and a teamster said to me. he said that donald trump groomed vulnerable -- economically vel vulnerable americans like a patteris, sayi

able to have that kind of policy to paraphrase minnesota's happy warrior, former vice president hubert humphrey, the merle's the government is how it treats the children, sick, and elderly and we're in the only industrializes country that does not get -- one they ever only industrialized countries without pay sick leave or paid maternity leave and rate not right. so let's get this bill passed. thank you. >> senator. >> thank you, think we all have to ask yourselves what that the lesson of the last election? why were people so afraid? why were people so concerned, so angry? they're angry because so much of their life they're challenged. they're challenged in saving for retirement. challenged in paying student loans. challenged in getting a mortgage and being able to afford housing as housing costs continued to escalate. they're challenged in a globalization and a world that is changing changing where the e is changing if think one of the main reasons why people feel challenged is because they can't provide for their kids. the insecurity of getting up every day and knowing i've got to go to work

should be able to have that kind of policy, to pick -- to paraphrase minnesota's happy warrior, hubert humphrey, the moral test of the government is how it treats the children, the sick, the elderly and people with disabilities. and as bernie pointed out we are the only industrialized country that doesn't get one of the only industrialized countries that doesn't get paid sick leave or paid maternity leave your it's just not right. so let's get this bill passed. thank you. >> senator heitkamp spirit thank you, senator gillibrand. i think we all have to ask ourselves what was the lesson of the last election? why were people so afraid? why were people so concerned? why would people so angry? they were angry because so much of their life they are challenged. their challenge been saving for retirement. there challenged in paying their student loans. they are challenged in getting a mortgage and being able to afford housing is housing costs continue to escalate. they are challenged in a globalization and in a world that is changing with the workforce is changing. i think one of the main reasons why p

he ran against hubert humphrey, who they generally -- was a genuinely great man, not a bully. i respectfully quote for my dairy -- from my very dear friend and colleague, the writer , let'srnyn, -- coin riverwood the 60's were like. he lost in the chicago democratic convention this day, and the accompanying riots, right at berkeley -- riots at berkeley, riots at san francisco and san francisco state, columbia, school busing in boston, still, one of the absolutely worst ideas in the history of american education.'s affirmation of martin luther king jr. and robert kennedy, the war in vietnam and its escalation, two preceding democratic presidents and their liberal think tank and visors, the smartest of the smart, the best of the best, give us this and more in vietnam. on the streets and in the living room, this revolutionary tour -- turmoil felt like flesh and blood clearing the country was running out of control -- blood. the country was running out of control and in this situation the american will hire richard nixon to make peace. and that is what he did. that was richard nix

he ran against hubert humphrey, who was a genuinely great man, not a bully. cameeal peacemaking genius into play. quote the writer john coyne. let's remember what the 1960's were like. riots and walks, the chicago democratic convention, the accompanying riots, riots at berkeley, the people's park at san francisco and riots at san francisco state, riots at columbia, riots over school busing in boston. still one of the absolutely worst ideas in the history of american education. the assassination of martin luther king jr. and robert kennedy, the war in vietnam and its escalation, a gift from the two preceding democratic presidents and their liberal think tank advisers, the smartest of the smart, the best of the best, give us this and more in vietnam. on the streets and in the living room, this revolutionary turmoil felt like flesh and blood. the country was running out of control and in this situation the american will hire richard nixon to make peace. and that is what he did. that is from john coyne. again, that was richard nixon, the peacemaker, making peace

he ran against hubert humphrey, a thuginely great man, not or bully like some politicians today. i respectfully quote for my friend, johne and remember whathts, the 1960's were like. riots, walks, -- sorry, and the accompanying riots at berkeley with the people's park in san francisco, the riots at san francisco state, the riots at columbia, riots over school busing in boston. still, one of the absolutely worst ideas in the history of american education. the assassination of martin luther king jr. and robert kennedy, the war in vietnam and its escalation and the gift from the two preceding democratic presidents and their liberal think tank advisers, the smartest of the smart, the best of the best, give us this and more in vietnam. on the streets and in the living rooms, this revolutionary turmoil felt like flesh and blood. the country seemingly was running out of control, and it was in this situation the american people hired richard nixon to make peace. despite the hostility of the liberal left and media, that is what he did. again, that was richard nixon, the peacemaker, making

leaders were acting in the you know, the ebullient 1960's, and confidence of the jfks and lbjs and hubert humphreys -- and compare them with today's leaders in congress -- the indecision, the lack of sure-footedness -- i think you would have to agree that 55-year-olds do not always act the same way and you're dealing with powerful generational forces at work that explain why one generation of war veterans, war heroes, and another generation which came of age in very different circumstances tend to have very different instincts about acting in the world. william: the kinds of historians who are drawn to our book -- and i'm sure it will be very controversial among academics because we are presenting something that is so new -- but the kinds who are drawn to it are the ones who themselves have focused on the human life cycle rather than just the sequential series of events. some good examples of that are morton keller up at brandeis and david hackett fischer. these are people who have noticed the power in not just generations, but the shifts that have happened over time in the way americans have treat