and what a job paul clement is doing as swa nsea what a job paul clement is doing as swansea boss.ernando llore nte scored celebrating after the game. fernando llorente scored the winner in injury time. he is the hero, two calls for him. what difference is he making? he has got a great track record as a coach. he was manager at derby and it was ok before he got sacked. but he is proving himself to be a good manager, five wins in eight games for swansea. first sean dyche. there we re for swansea. first sean dyche. there were strange decisions in the game and there was a penalty given to swa nsea for and there was a penalty given to swansea for mistaken identity city. i know how centre forwards get that high in the air to win a header like that and that is by pushing on another player's back and it was quite clear i thought. i have not seen quite clear i thought. i have not seen it, but it looks clear. i thought they were generally the better side and in the first—half definitely, we managed to calm it down in the second half and we grew into the game a little bit. we are still not r

so it's really a laying out of what's to come. >> woodruff: paul clement, what was your main takeawayay? >> well, i thought probably the i think the single most interesting part of the hearing was judge gorsuch's own statement, and i think what the american public saw was somebody who's very poised, very experienced. he's been a federal court of appeals judge for over ten years. and i think somebody by any conventional standard is qualified to be on the supreme court of the united states. so i think that will probably give us an indication. we'll obviously see a lot more of judge gorsuch in tomorrow's hearings answering questions and the back and forth, but that was really the high light for me. >> woodruff: and pam karlan, we only heard a moment ago from judge gorsuch himself, but what was your main takeaway in terms of watt we now know? >> well, from judge gorsuch himself, he made this point, and you saw it in the clip, that in 97% of his cases below the decision is unanimous. that's totally different from what happens on the supreme court. the job of a judge and the job of a justic

paul clement, president bush's solicitor general, quote, found this proposition unconvincing, and it was removed from the testimony. do you still believe that the president has inherent authority to intercept the communications of americans in the united states that cannot be legislated away by congress? >> goodness, no, senator. >> good. >> and i didn't believe it at the time. what i was you serving at the time, as i recall. my recollection and i'd be happy to review whatever you have before you, is that i was acting in the capacity as a speechwriter and taking material produced by the components that were responsible for litigating these issues, include playing clement, paul clement, a dear friend of mine. and the office of legal counsel and others. and assembling it to put words in together that sounded like english. and i think people like my writing, and that was my job. i think i was the scribe. >> okay. let's move on. i'd like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office, we discussed the heller decision which you said you were open to discussing since the case had been

what is paul clement doing?, a brilliant assistant to carlo ancelotti and now an excellent manager. with eight games in charge, he has got five wins. you can see how the fans are celebrating at the liberty stadium. two calls for llore nte. liberty stadium. two calls for llorente. he nearly went in the tra nsfer llorente. he nearly went in the transfer window. it was a very controversial burnley penalty, a case of mistaken identity. but in the end swansea won the game, but sean dyche was not happy with the winning goal. i know how centre forwards get that high in the air to win a header like that and that is by pushing on another player's back and it was quite clear i thought. i have not seen it, but it looks clear. i thought they were generally the better side and in the first—half definitely, we managed to calm it down in the second half and we grew into the game a little bit. we are still not right, but still enough to cause them trouble. we thoroughly deserved the win, we pushed hard. two crossbars and a post

paul clement, quote, found this proposition unconvincing and it was removed from the testimony. do you still believe that the president has inherent authority, this is important, to intercept the communications of americans in the united states that cannot be legislated away by congress? >> goodness no, senator. i didn't believe it at the time. what i was serving at the time, as i recall, again, my recollection and i would be happy to review whatever you have before you, is that i was acting in a capacity as a speechwriter. and taking material produced by the components that were responsible for litigating these issues including mr. clement, paul clement, dear friend of mine, and the office of legal counsel and others and assembling it to put words in together that sounded like english. and i think people like my writing. and that was my job. i think i was the scribe. >> okay. let's move on. i would like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office, we discussed the heller decision, which you said you were open to discussing since the case had been decided. at that time, y

clement, paul clement, a dear friend of mine. the office of legal counsel and others and assembling it to put words in together that sounded like english. i think people like my writing and that was my job. i think i was the scribe. >> all right. let's me of on. i'd like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office we discussed the heller decision which you said you were open to discussing since the case had been decided. you thought the majority opinion written by justice scalia and the dissent by justin stevens were brilliant where both justices sought to explain reasoning by look at the original public meaning of the second amendment. which decision did you agree with and why? >> senator, i think we've alluded to my difficulty here. i do think everything you've just said is accurate. both justice scalia and justice stevens wrote excellent opinions in that case. i'm not here though to great my boss's work. that would be impertinent of me i suspect and they would think so. i would worry saying i agree with one or the other

paul clement, president bush's solicitor general found this prom signatures unconvincing and it was removed from the testimony. do you still believe the president has inherent authority -- this is important -- to intercept the communication of americans in the united states that cannot be legislated away by congress in. >> goodness no, senator. >> good. >> and i didn't believe it at the time. what i was serving at the time, as i recall, given my recollection and i'd be happy to review whatever you have before you, is that i was acting in the capacity as a speech writer and taking material produced by the components that were responsible for litigating these issues, including mr. clement, palm clement, dear friend of mine and the office of legal counsel and others and eye sem bling it to put words in together that sounded like english and i think people liked my writing and that was my job. i think i was the scribe. >> ay, let move on. i'd like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office, we discussed the heller decision, which you said you were open to discussing since the case had b

bancorp paul clement is from a presidential advisor and air to one of history's most people fortunesd at the age of 101. he was the youngest and last dividing grandson of standard oil powder john rockefeller. it was the only one of the fact -- the five sons be spent his time in the corporate world. global news 24 hours a day powered by more than 2600 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. you can find more stories on the bloomberg at top . japan coming back online. it has been another good session for asian markets. particularly those emerging markets and the shares in hong kong rising to the highest levels led by property developers since october 2015. a near six-year high on its closer of 1%. since the fed raise interest rates a lot of these coming into the south korean market which helped boost the cost. in terms of stocks, a lot of socks in focus. group shares rising, the merger of the most a year. management is making a play. a record high. an interesting story, the serving that the business trying to diversify a slowdown in australia making 1.2 6 billion aussi

clement, paul clement, a dear friend of mine and the office of legal counsel and others and assembling words in, together, that sound like english. you know and i think people like my writing. and that was my job. i think i was a a scribe. >> let move on. i would like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office we discussed the heller decision which you said you were open to discussing since the case had been decided. you thought both the majority opinion written by justice scalia and the dissent written by justice stevens were brilliant examples of originalism where both justices saw to explain the reasoning by looking at original public meaning of the second amendment. which decision did you agree with and why? >> well, senator i think, we've alluded to my difficulty here. i do think everything you just said is accurate. both justice scalia and justice stevens wrote excellent opinions in that case. i am not here though to grade my bosses's work. it would be kind of impertinent of me i would suspect. i'm sure they would think so. i also worry that saying agree with one or the o

clement, paul clement, dear friend of mine, and the office of legal counsel and others, and assemblingit to put words together that sounded like english. and i think people like my writing. and that was my job. i think i was to describe. sen. feinstein: ok, let's move on. i would like to go to the heller case. when we met in my office, we discussed the heller decision, which you said you were open to discussing since the case had been decided. at that time he said he thought both of the majority opinion written by justice scalia and the dissent written by justice stevens were brilliant examples of original is some -- originalism, where both justice sought to explain the reasoning by looking at the original public meaning of the second amendment. which decision did you agree with, and why? judge gorsuch: well, senator, we have alluded to my difficulty here. i do think everything you have just said is accurate. both justice scalia and justice stevens wrote excellent opinions in that case. i am not here, though, to grade my boss' work. it would be impertinent of me, i suspect. i certainly

clemente council meeting. they wanted to erect a statue of paul walker. they asked him why paul walker would have anything to do with san clemente. they said he went to high school here. they said no, actually he didn't. they said oh, i think his cousin might have.

clemente council meeting. they wanted to erect a statue of paul walker.ked him why paul walker would have anything to do with san clemente. they said he went to high school here. they said no, actually he didn't. they said oh, i think his cousin might have. hilarious.

clemente council meeting. they wanted to erect a statue of paul walker.d have anything to do with san clemente. they said he went to high school here. they said no, actually he didn't. they said oh, i think his cousin might have. hilarious. >> steph curry. they bought a new dog. a golden doodle