emily: how do you do it? how do you run youtube with five kids?: the main thing for me has been to focus and prioritize. and so, i'm really good about saying, "this is my work time." and when i'm in the office, i am really, really focused on what i am doing, and i am prioritizing. i always thought about, "how do i get from point a to point b as quickly as possible?" i do not have forever. i cannot work nights or weekends. in some ways, it actually causes me to see some of the shortcuts, some of the new opportunities, because i'm thinking, "how do i grow this faster, really quickly?" let's just forget about all of those other things that are growing slowly, not going anywhere. i do not have time for that. i have to focus on the big idea, and we have to get them done now. and so, that is actually really good, because tech is about growing big ideas quickly. i use my work time to focus on that, and, when i get home, i really try to focus on my family, my kids. my husband is very helpful. realistically, to be fair, as i have risen in my career, i have

we do not do a great job of this. yes, there is extreme vetting in place, but the point that you make, that this is mostly luck, is, in fact, true. most refugees we let in are people who want to be let in because they are fleeing and they had a justified fear of persecution. but let's not pretend to ourselves that this is a situation that is anything other than a political decision. that is what i wanted to say. things,just a couple of and i want to get jim's take. when the slowdown occurred in the obama administration when i was working at the international refugee committee, we had discussions with dhs officials and others, what was the likelihood of the process moving quickly, collaboration among literally 17 u.s. government agencies to vet an individual coming into the united states. these are not fly-by-night agencies. we are talking about the top of the various intelligence groups in the united states government. so i don't think it is quite as posit,night as you might danielle. but i do agree. there is a moral

you can't do that. you can't increase spending and take the most critical part of the budgetory reform off of the table. of i think the very first step in this process has to be the budget proposal. the budget was a skinny budget. it dealt with one-third of the budget for one year. soon they will come out with their full budget. the question is how will you have all of those numbers work together? what we know from republican is they have been very set on balancing the budget in ten years. you cannot get the balance if you have big tax cuts and importantly take off entitlements without going to -- and sorry, but numbers are completely unrealistic. the reason we will not have sustained 3% growth, but we have a very different labor market than we have had in the past. there are no credible estimates of all of those policies that could get us up to 3% in a sustained way. what i want to see is a comprehensive plan. that will include bringing our debt down and entitlement reform which we can't walk away from

so what do you do?> this is why we called you. >> when's the last time you guys had a staff meeting? >> we don't have them. >> i been here three years. there's been one. >> no staff meetings. how do you know what's going on? >> you don't. when the [bleep] hits the fan, that's when we learn about it. >> this--it's like--this is like the definition of insanity. how many total employees here? >> 17 employees. >> if the business does go out, that's 17 people that are on the street, and you guys lose-- >> a lot of money. >> i think bill, he doesn't even sleep at night. >> who's bill? >> bill gary's my partner. he's the one who handles all the financials and does all the book work. >> the one that doesn't come. >> he's not coming. >> and why didn't he were to be here again? >> they're business consultants themselves, and they just felt that it would be-- >> i'm not a consultant. i write checks. >> right, they're consultants. >> there's a big difference between me and them. >> yeah, i know. >> so what they wou

putin to do what he's doing. he's a master of deception. he's creating problems around the world so this population has this nationalist view of putin's leadership that allows him to stay in power. the progress we are making and getting populous sport is compromised. u.s. leadership has made it different. we still have a long way to go. in recent years, we lost a little bit of the momentum and certainly are russia's dominance now with world's affairs. they are moving their footprint well beyond europe. you saw the attack here in the united states and you see what they are doing in the middle east. we have a challenge ahead of us. >> let me turn to what's ahead of us. we have had some achievements and progress and back slipping. what is it that the united states could or should do to address that. i know you just introduced the bill so we can be talking about that. >> i am proud of bills that we passed for russia and was passed globally with my colleague and legislation and senator mccain. the two of us have championed legislation on capitol

doesn't do what we said we would do? we are looking to make this bill much more consistent with what we told the american people we would do when they elected us and that has been our focus the entire five weeks of this deba debate. it will continue to be until we can move in this direction. >> let me redo some tweets. i know you have read them but maybe the room has a. the republican house freedom caucus was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. the freedom caucus will help the entire republican agenda if they don't get on the team and fast. we must fight them and democrats in 2018. >> we held up a bill that only 17% of our citizens approved of and somehow that is not the right thing to do. even congress should be able to do better than a 17% approval rating. >> look, we are trying, i say this all the time, we make this job way too hard. our job is to do what we said we would do. this has probably been the central domestic policy in the past six years. the elections were about this issue. let's get it right. b

but if i'm doing it, i don't want to do it blindly. i want to do it informed about what i am doing. and i have to ensure that i can always articulate a reason that i can live with. because at the end of each evening, i have to lie down and live with myself. and so it is important i think, and that is what the trial judging taught me. to recognize the human cost of our decisions. >> justice, there have been many points in our history, the civil war, the civil rights movement, where we have been deeply divided as a people. i think we are in another period of deep polarization as political scientists would say. you're part of a branch of government that believes deeply in reason to disagreement. my question is, or two questions, i guess. what do you think is the key to persuading someone who is skeptical of your position to agree with you, and what would you tell students about how to engage productively in an era where we are deeply divided on matters of great significance? justice sotomayor: i start, always, and i think it is where all of my colleagues start, which is with respect fo

, we do. so with this continuous negotiation that is as good as it will get. it is the necessary attention for. >> what to often. >> with that was what church was trying to describe it when they say things that should be legitimate. >> this is the last question . [applause] >> i do look at fascinating chapters we have not covered 20 percent of what is in the but - - the book and gift itself is trivial but it is not at all timothy snyder 20th century historian in yale written on the history with the first well-known book and the grim history of the lens between stalin and hitler it is what you crave another country's he has another book that is equally grim the same part of the world at the same time. those that we wrote rapidly and is giving away what he does is list 20 things you can do if you feel it is possible to the ft - - of the authoritarian derive to be a tribute to good causes? it is of very good. >> one of my province moments of brightest instance occurred to weeks ago when the head

what do you think? >> no, i don't agree at all what you saw in 16 was a genuine democratic revolution against the big corporate culture, the lack of democracy, the lack of feeling. the very fact that the socialists who are in power in france today got 6%. the conservative opposition didn't make the final run-off shows you that far from disappearing, it's still there. marine le pen is not the favorite over the course of the next couple weeks. but you know something? we could be here in a couple weeks time after what may well be a very close contest indeed. populism, opposition is big. the super national projects are still growing. >> neil: your thoughts on the market reaction. they interpret the union being intact is better than the union not. that -- to your point that could change. but what do you make of that collective market read? >> well, i'm afraid that too many of the opinions is markets listen to comes from the big banks that are hand and glove with the politicians and they like life as it is. w

do thank you. to usgerald is coming from california. what are your thoughts? caller: i have been in law enforcement, and there is a reason the police carry guns, mainly to stop a bad guy with a gun or a good guy with a gun. far as the arguments as reading from the newspapers saying the worst thing about gun laws, well, that depends upon what side of the fence you are on. it seems the breakdown is that liberals are anti-concealed carry and conservatives are just the opposite. and that is true. when you get a concealed carry permit, at least in california, i assume it is the same way in other states, you have to be 21. so it is not that you have bad 21, and most the time if you have got a gun, it is concealed anyway and nobody knows about it. and the gentleman earlier that stated if he saw somebody with a gun on his hip, he would shoot him first, well, he would be going to jail. if there is not a definite threat and you use deadly force, you're going to jail. so i believe that students should have th

do we have the allies on the ground to do this work? there is the relevant forced to take on isis and deal with the reconstruction afterward, what happens in iraq, do we have the partnerships that you as the cia director need and also the country needs to deal with these nonstate actors? >> i tend not to focus just on isis. they had a good run, almost up .nd through baghdad and erbil to actively engage with everyone and i think we do. we have a good set of partners. this will provide an important bulwark for us as we begin to fight what will be the next phase against al qaeda and isis and the taliban in the places we find them. >> your first trip abroad was to turkey and to the goal. why did you go there first, and what did you hear? >> we have important intelligence partners there who help america each and every day stay safe and i want to thank them for that. i want to talk to them about the wet that i expect more, that need increased assistance and those pockets that remain in those places that are funding care or educating terrorist

what do we do here?t we said we would do a long time ago, and that is put in safe havens where the people can go so they can get out from underneath this madman who has killed over 500,000, most of them all non-combatants. that's assume tragedy. you have -- that's a human tragedy. you have got to stop him from using the gas. lou: president obama let him get away with it for year. >> that list you just put up tells us he thinks america isn't going to do anything. we should do a cruise miss soil strike at some of his air power facilities to demonstrate we won't tolerate this. i would tell the russians i'm doing it and i expect to you curb this behavior in the future. we have got to stand up with some kind of moral foundation for this horror taking place on the world stage here. lou: i are also agree with candidate president trump who said he didn't want boots on the ground yet here we are. and we are not talking about nato or a coalition, we are not talk about arab states in the region who bear great respo

that does not do it. would urge him to go home and the white house -- in the white house and do his homework and come up with a tax bill. come up with a solution about health care. in mar-a-lago,lf that will not get more jobs in pennsylvania or west virginia or i will or michigan. michigan. he can campaign for 2020. the old saying, for me once, -- the democrats in houston have a plan for some of this resistance, in addition to marches and social media activism? caller: yes, a new party chair in harris county which went democratic heavily, george bush's hometown, the old george bush. every election in harris county, used to be a republican county but now a democratic stronghold. all of the democratic congressman the represent this county -- i mean, republican congressman, are nervous, ted from fort bend county that represents part of harris county. i forget his name. they are all nervous. texas, we have had rallies for o rourke where i could not get in. the union hall. host: the campaign against ted cruz,

for doing that? i'm going to take you back , to fisher-price and a toy factory, biggest toys in the city, shut down in mexico and china , the city never really recovered much. what can you do to help bring or keep those kind of jobs back in ? >> we have to provide a, the tax rates that make corporate competitive in this country. that's the first place we are going to start. we have a 35 percent corporate tax ate. the oecd rate is 23 . you know, if you look at 23 versus 35, we're not competitive. there's tax domiciles where you can get substantially lower but the president has been constantly talking about rate matters so we've got to start with taxes. because companies, the first thing they're going to make his build a business, i'm successful, what part do i keep and what part do i give my shareholders, what part do i give the government? let's start with that. we've got to have a labor force compatible to what we need to hire. you have heard a lot about retooling of the labor force, reeducating of

how you doing, sir? >> hi. i'm doing great today. how are you? >> doing great.p from tomorrow's you cannot listen to that song >> reporter: without being emotional. >> being raised, you were around the veterans and the pride they take and the views of the flag and the country, and what things stand for. i was like, man, what would my dad do today if he was alive and watching this happen? >> this is why dwrld imagine because of your father that you're an avid support of the uso. you make performing for the troops a regular part of your schedule. it's important to you. >> well, i went for the first time just to make sure i honored my father, you know. and then i got over there and found out no one would go do it. and the uso was having trouble finding people to support the troops. and i saw that void. so my agent became a board member, and we became real active with uso about 14 years ago. >> list wherein, thought it was amazing despite all the backlash you got you performed at the preinauguration saerm. and you did want care about the backlash, did you? >> no, yo

i do not see why not. our provost could dictate that could have those classes. , it is a wicked problem. because of student government, there is a different mechanism to which we can do that. >> it comes to the individual as well. this generation, look at the pressure put on you. with technology doubling every two years. our lifestyle is so fast, everything is so quick. actually if you watch the big , lie, american addict 2, i start with a quote from huxley's "brave new world." i don't know if you have ever read that, it is one of my favorites. it is a dystopic portrayal of the future where there is a pill for everything. everything is, you know, the consumer or the citizen sort of complacent within this manufactured reality. you know, all i wanted to do was give someone a philosophical approach to life. i think it is important to have your individual philosophy to learn who you are. collectivism is good, but you have to understand ourselves and take responsibility for ourselves. >> one more question. righ

i will tell you that from working with members, they do come here because they do want to do good policies. i think there are a lot of things that make the system nonfunctioning. one of those things is the polarization between the parties, where they are more focused with eating each other up and having a win for a democrat or a republican rather than getting things done and i think there are a lot of pieces in the system that are making it more difficult. i don't tend to think it is a reflection of bad people. i'm sure there are bad apples but i think it is more systemic. one of the things we do need to learn from the election is not only do we need broad, sweeping, policy changes, i think we have learned a lot about the need for a great economy that is working better for everyone -- there are big structural changes that we do need to be grappling with. and i do think we need political reform. on fiscal policy. i want to fix the debt but i think we need to figure out ways to fix the political system. because in many ways, the record levels of debt is a reflection of the dysfunction in thi

to do it. the lamborghini of mental health problems. that you have to be good. you want that little bit extra for 0cd, a little bit extra expertise and experience. six years ago, keith was able to deon‘s 500 0cds to three or four. deon was paying keith privately and didn't complete the treatment at the time. so he's now called keith again for help. i can straightaway see gaps here. yeah, yeah. put the spoon back. and what — what may you want to do now? uh, tidy up this drawer. ok, i'll get the spoon, put it in, i'll then straighten these things. yeah, yeah, yeah. like this. make sure they are all extremely straight. i would then close the drawer. that doesn't feel like at the moment, i am holding, so i'm still holding the drawer. can you let go of the drawer, then? does it trigger a thought about anybody dying in a car crash already? yes, it's not right at the moment. it makes me want to open it again and do that, it again. so stay with that thought now, that you're really uncomfortable about t

how long do you think it would take to do that for production drugs? >> i think it could happen right away. i do not see why not. have those could classes. it is a wicked problem. there is a different mechanism to see if we can do that. noise comes to the individual as well, and a think that this generation in some ways -- look at the pressure put on you. technology --y -- two years. our lifestyle is so fast, everything so quick, it actually -- if you watch the big lie, american addict 2, i start with a quote from huxley's "brave new world." it is a dystopic portrayal of the future where there is a pill for everything, so everything is, you know, the consumer or the citizen sort of complacent within this manufactured reality. wasknow, all i wanted to do give someone a philosophical approach to life. i think it is important to have your individual philosophy to learn who you are. collectivism is good, but you that we havestand to take response ability for ourselves. >> one more question. right here. go ahead, sir. >> hello. you mentioned natural alterna

how do you think trump's doing? doing good. >> reporter: they like trump even though his first actions haven't really helped him. trump's immigration talk made it harder for greg to find migrant workers to harvest his crops. >> can't get it picked, then you're in trouble. >> reporter: then there's the efforts to replace obamacare which greg and brandy are on. >> why do you like it? >> well, i pay $88 a month for me and my wife. where i was like -- before obamacare come in, i was paying like 660. >> reporter: she feels guilty, she knows people who can't afford their private insurance or can't get insurance at all. she's okay with trump's efforts to replace it. >> it still doesn't make sense to pay so little and still the poor people get nothing. >> reporter: you think you should pay more? >> yeah. in other words, yes. >> reporter: in birmingham, it's another long day for the cab driver. he's voted democratic, in 2016, voted trump. >> the thing about a businessman is that it's action. and it's not policy. >> reporter:

either you do it with coal or you do it with natural gas. and i know that's not going to please everybody. it's also not going to please everybody what i tell you about the laying of pipelines. every time a pipeline goes through, firk has the power of eminent domain. they get to decide the rout and whose land it goes over. it could go over your private property and all they have to do is give you reasonable compensation, fair market compensation for your land. and that's the law. that is the law, the way it works. and so what we get a lot in our office is we get folks that call up and say, well, wait a minute. why is this pipeline coming over my land instead of farmer jones' land a mile away? and that's legitimate question. and so the point i've been taking is firk needs to be transparent about how they pick their routs. i think that's fair. i don't think it's overly burdensome on firk or the pipeline companies to explain how they pick their rout. because otherwise people are going to go away thinking, wait a minute, nobody told me why the p

what did the russians do, why did they do it? this is part of russian doctrine that goes back to the soviet era of spreading misinformation. they have now taken it to a much more modern space in terms of using cyber techniques. so it was revalidated one more time. i think everyone with perhaps the president would accept the russians were behind the d.n.c. hack, the hack of the john podesta emails. they were behind the use of distributing fake news. the way they do this is they have close to 1000 paid internet trolls in moscow that create bots that can flood search engines like twitter and facebook and others with false news. real fake news, not the kind of president has sometimes referred to. there was complete consensus from the technical experts and the more historical and policy experts that russia was behind us and it was based on the assumption russia was trying to create chaos and want to try to split countries apart and drive as big of social wedges as possible. if you look at the 2016 electorate in terms of some of the to

this is something we do not do. we do not use our common sense. us over here, as they plan to do, stop and think about that. stop and think about what, michigan, or someone -- flint, michigan, for someone who said i care about children dying. he does not care, he does not really care. start listening to little words. when russia says something, listen to them. i am hearing a lot from china but nothing about russia. .let's reset for a moment this is the state of play, according to the washington post about the situation in north korea. newh korea shows up missiles and huge military parade but does not test nukes. reads, the united states has sent an aircraft carrier strike group to the korean peninsula, the president has repeatedly said that if china will not use its leverage to rein in north korea, the united states will act. vice president pence arrives in seoul to underscore washington's strong alliances with south korea and japan and their determination to stop new -- north korea's nuclear program. they urge the united states and north korea no

this, you can't do that, and they do it. it has its own internal ethics police through the office of , they are the ultimate o geithner on government ethics were there are real questions. where the office of government ethics is not sure about something, it can refer the question to the office of legal counsel. our inspectorn general a responsibility to police all of that for the department itself. structures in of our system for ensuring that people abide by the rule of law. tois interesting to me compliance ands how much attention the public is now giving to ethics. finding myself in a strange position of giving advice about the law and what it requires and having people say, really, you can do that, people can do that, that is what the law says? and i say, yes, that is how it has always been applied. that youle, the notion can keep an asset. people thought that when you go into the government you have to sell everything. that has never been true. yet now people are concerned that axis can be maintained even if they trigge

do we need to do it right now? or, can that be delayed and we can do some of these other things that you would like to have us do? >> sir, i would submit to you that all three legs of the try ad, the missile leg, the bomber leg and the submarine leg, the three legs of the triad were all built to build in to a specific attribute we were looking for. the missile leg gives us the most responsive leg of the triad. the bomber leg gives us the most flexible leg and submarine is most survivable leg of the triad and we need all three of those legs to be able to do the mission that we have been asked to do. >> i got ten seconds. i'm not debating whether or not we need it. when do we need it? >> sir -- >> when -- we have to make some tough choices. >> absolutely. >> in making those tough choices some things may get delayed. i yield back. >> mr. lamborn. >> thank you, mr. chairman. let me just try to clarify one thing here. i don't think there's anything in any legislation where a plan has to be devised and given to this comm

i want to do it first to really do it right. maria: so where are they on that? more from my exclusive interview with the president coming up. also on wall street this week, the major banks unofficially kicking off the earnings season on thursday with strong results from jpmorgan, wells fargo's revenue fell short. we'll get a reaction from the policy coming out of washington when i come to a former morgan stanley ceo. this weekend marks the 105th birthday of the founder of north korea. a lot of focus on what that means for the rest of the world. chinese president xi jinping is calling for a peaceful resolution after president trump redirected navy warships toward the korean peninsula last week in an effort to deter north korea from testing another nuclear weapon. high stakes meetings in russia, meanwhile, secretary of state rex tillerson meeting with russian president vladimir pin in moscow. the russian lead says the lel of trustas deteriorated between the u.s. and russia after the u.s.' attack, the military strikes against syria

lemonis: how do you keep her momentum alive? what do you guys do to do that? trevor: nothing.e started as a purpose brand, but i think we'd be more of surf-beachy brand. it just didn't feel right pushing a story of "this watch will provide meals for children in need." we wanted to make sure that people knew that it was still a cool watch and not just a donation piece. lemonis: the story that trevor's telling me has confused the heck out of me because in one sentence he's telling me that it was about his mom and the charities, and the next minute, he's telling me about surfing brands and cool things. so, i wanted to get the actual story from him. i think the fact that you have that as your purpose is a very big deal. you're driven to have this succeed because that's your connection to her. trevor: i don't think about that. i just -- i think i've pushed it out. losing her is just -- i haven't, like, dealt with it, you know? i'm just bitter. but yeah, we keep moving, for sure, [ voice breaking ] 'cause she would love that. lemonis: i lost my mom, you know, not too long ago. trevo

able to do. they are never going to build a wall. the tax reform bill is going to be so stacked in favor of people who make more money and all those people in wisconsin, pennsylvania and michigan who voted for this guy on the assumption that they are going to get jobs -- >> that's only true if the democrats can show they would be able to do those type of things in this economy. >> remember, donald trump was not an alternative when he started running for -- somebody's going to get the democratic nomination and whoever it is -- >> that will be a great matchup, if it's lisbeth warren. >> they haven't been able to resonate a coherent message. it's bordering on hysterical. they are not able to come together. you have different factions. people who want bernie sanders, some people want elizabeth warren. >> i think we always look out and say who do you got? when you talk about that with the republicans for years out, john mccain and romney got beaten. it was the first time there is an open, republican p

so what do we do about that? how do we allow states to say, look, no. we are spending all this money. we are not getting value. you are not even showing up to the doctors' appointments. >> i spent most of my career at the state level. i would say on just those two examples, all of that can be and isr addressed. the transportation benefit for people who can use public transportation, that's what they get. they don't get a cab. in some cases we are talking about people who need to get to dialysis. it is noter an emergency if we don't provide that it will become an emergency. so the devil is in the details for sure. i think for kids, medicaid provides for poor kids in particular a benefit that is critical to their healthy development and we now have evidence to show as these children areow now adults that is paying off. they are paying more taxes. they are getting more education. think there are some sort of sound bites. i think particularly on the work, on the drug testing, all of this. i really appreciated your comments because i think they are attemptin

one thing tore the president to do it and legally he is allowed to do it. but it is very different for a staffer to use his official capacity to do that. and it's just inappropriate and he can tweet at me all day long and it was just not appropriate. >> have you talked to trump after these tweets about you guys? mr. meadows: yes, a number of times. >> you had to have addressed these? mr. meadows: i don't take it personally. he wants to get something done for the american people. i understand that. i want to get something done for the american people. when we look at that, we are unified in that. we want premiums to come down, the current bill the way it is doesn't do that and he has been told the current bill does do that. and there's the difference. i'm enough of a policy wonk to look at this in detail and for me it's not enough to say we passed something so we can check a box. and it's not for the president, but we have to lower premiums and until i'm convinced it does that, we won't vote yes. mr. jordan: justin amash is a principled member. and there are

one of the going to do? go back to doing whatever they are doing a four. that is why we have high recidivism rates. we need to ask ourselves, are they part of the human capital also? the answer is yes. should we be turning to develop them also and providing an opportunity to change the trajectory of their lives that they can become part of the engine and not part of the loan? of course we should. and when we start thinking about that in all of the different ways and stop allowing ourselves to be manipulated and divided. divide and a house divided cannot stand. let's figure oh what we can do to work together to get this done. thank you very much. [applause] >> before you go, not a question, but we are pleased that you are doing the listening tour that you are, and engaging so many people throw the country. we wanted to offer you a list of suggested stops from our state partners, the resident organizations here in this room, that would welcome a chance to welcome you to their communities. dr. carson: you are keeping me busy so i can't get under trouble. than

what do we do about the $1.3 billion in fmf? i think it would be disspiriting choice to go back to supplying that unconditionally. we're helping egypt fight weapons that are unsuited to the threats it faces while reinforcing that mentality and kicking the serious problems down the road again. another possibility would be to provide most of it, continue with holding the 15% currently with held boss of human rights abuses. that would send a nottest signal of disapproval. not sure if it would do all that much good. the third option would be to step back and ask whether our investment in egypt is appropriate given the opportunities and thets we face elsewhere. my view is that it is completely out of balance. does it really make sense for this government, which definitely rejects our advice, which describes us to its people as a hostile enemy. i agree we should taylor what we provide to item counter-insurgence operations in places like the sinai, if they would accept it, which i'm not sure they would do, and think about other places

, and you as a coach and your wife do, what do you think communities can do more of i in that effortve and empower and make a difference? >> guest: i think one of the best things communities can do, is particularly, the corporations, the corporate world within the community, their out reach into the schools and showing young people that it's easy to turn on espn and sports center whatever it may be and watch an athlete but there's so many other fields that is going out, and the corporate people, ceo volunteer, being in the schools, and helping these young people tutoring, mentoring and reaching down that way to help mentor the young people more often, to me it's a great way to get involved, but also to pull our young people forward to give them an opportunity to see what other career paths are and can choose to do. >> armstrong: do you think for you as a coach, and sometimes your father, your role model, you are an example, do you think when you these athletes, particularly as they are coming to you as rookies or whatever, they understand some of the -- they understand giving back to

or do this or do that. but most of the things that i chose to discuss are the things that i think have the best evidence and actually have a lot of bileology -- buyology explaining why it may work. >> is there evidence that a mediterranean diet might have an impact. >> i didn't discuss diet as much because i had a limited amount of time. i would say that the area of diet is a very interesting one. a lot of interest in it. but not as much work that we know so far. so the idea that single nutrients say vitamins or omega 3 those have been studied and haven't worked out so well. the field is now shifting towards more of a pattern of diet. so as you allude to, a mediterranean diet, a healthy diet, where it's not just one nutrient but the whole shabang and that's looking much more promising but again we still need more work to know definitively. sen. collins: there have have been clinical trials that have been cleared some of the plaque tangles from the brain. and yet it appears that it did not restore cognitive

♪ we do it like that ♪ this is how we do ♪ do, do ♪ this is how we do. paper. >> office depot will shred your paper for you up to five pounds of it if you bring that in to help prevent identity fraud if you can't afford or have space. you don't want to just rip it up. to prevent identity fraud take 5 pounds of paper to office depot and they dual it for you. amazing. abby: all the deals this morning. pete: shed all your tax forms and all the stuff they would use for identity theft. puppies and barbecue. abby: we have everything this morning. we do want to start with a fox news alert. all eyes are on north korea this morning. dictator kim jong un parading his military arsenal during annual celebration of his country's founding. pete: this is vice president mike pence leaving joint base andrews heading out to seoul, south korea. is he going to be heading out for important talks there. that's him in realtime live boarding what i presume is air force 2. jon: not exactly a relaxing weekend. he is off to asia to reassure allies about the steadfast nature of the

. - be honest, when you get home from school, do you immediately start to do your homework? - nope. (rhythmic rock music) - well, i mean, homework is kind of tough when i get home, but i do do it, i try my best to do it as soon as i can, but it doesn't always work out that way. - not at all. - why? - um, i don't know, there's just other things. you know, school work is important and all that, but it's still important to balance work and fun, so when you get a good balance, that's an important thing. - be honest, when you get home from school, do you immediately start to do your homework. - no, i usually start to do my homework in the morning before school starts. - how about when you have an assignment to write a paper or complete a project, do you start on it right away or do you wait until almost the last minute. - well, it usually depends on how much time i have. i'd say maybe in between right away and the last minute. - spread it out over time, do pieces of it, and then push it off until the last minute, yeah. - well, usually when i have an assignment due, i wait for a long time

you do not have to do it simultaneously. you can do it sequentially. can you have everything? i'm not sure you can have everything at the same time. i was a stay-at-home mom. three years. not know that that was going to be part of my pathway but when our third child announced herself about the time tim was getting engaged in local i was a busy legal aid lawyer, it quickly became clear to me that tim was going to be out a lot, and that was a recipe for challenge and out like, "ok, out." was very reluctant. i didn't want to. i was terrified. i had a friend who came home and started taking cake decorating classes and i was terrified. [laughter] ms. holton: not only did i go home and love being a stay-at-home mom, i went to one of her cake decorating classes. [laughter] ms. holton: i have never worked harder in my life than when i was a stay-at-home mom. you know, you just do not know what the outcomes, what the consequences of your steps will be. it was the right decision at the time. it was during that time that someone asked me to be a substitute judge in the juvenile court. i

is doing. i think that's a toehold that's worth remembering and using because we do have -- we have agreed to the goal of ending hungergy 2030. and if tansa nia can make a serious effort at that, so can vermont. and then the other point i want to -- i don't know, i think that the severity of this crisis is sort of turned me more into a preacher but i do want to make the point that, you know, i believe in the god of the bible and so when i see that the world and our country have made dramatic progress against hunger and poverty in recent decades, to me, this is an experience of our loving god in our time. it's like the exodus, the biblical exodus, you know, when these people had this experience of a great liberation and they recognized that as a revelation of the deviend and felt called to get with the program. so agree with jim, it's time for to us get with the program. >> closing thoughts, abby. >> this is what i would say, first i'll pick up where david left off that when tarm things happen a

so, what do you do?ow on twitter, facebook, instagram, whatever, at what age do you feel comfortable doing the full version of the births and the bees? i mean, get down to the plumbing. >> ya, the pluming? >> i believe in doing it from the very beginning. >> yes? >> yes. >> would you explain everything? >> yes. >> all right. >> but if you were raised to not talk about it very much, it is uncomfortable. >> yes. >> i was raise that way. >> yes. >> a lot of us were. >> yes, a lot of us were. but i've never understood why this is your arm. this is your head. those are your fingers, and then we get down here and go that's a pea pea. that's not a pea pea. yikes. >> i would love to be there, or to have been there when you gave the talk to jessica and jill. i bet that was interesting moment. >> oh, you didn't. no way that you gave that conversation. he is a big talker. he didn't give that. >> joy did it. >> okay, so there. >> all of that talking and he didn't even do it. >> i would certainly do it. >> i looked u

do you subscribe to that? do you believe that? >> here's part of the thing that we've got to think through. number 1 do, they pay for themselves in the long run. i'm talking to you from the state of illinois, which is no stranger to you in terms of physical disaster and avoidance behavior. the other question is, do we want permanent tax policy or do we want a tax policy that will expire in ten years? if we're trying to influence business behavior, which we are, if we wants people to resure their corporate interests here in the united states, do we think they will do that in a tax code that expires in ten years? let's is not start out at the notion of throwing the towel in on revenue neutrality. we can have in pay for itself. we can have growth, deal with the tax base, the erosion of the tax base and we can have a permanent tax code. >> neil: but you have to give on something. either scale back some tax breaks that are popular today like for state local taxes. would you be open to that? >> the blueprint -- the house blue print puts

trump is doing in a form job. -- trumpthink he will is doing and job. i do not think you will put american lives at risk if he does not have to. host: and if he has to? caller: if he has to come he has to. he would not be the first want to do it and we have to protect ourselves and what is ours. host: do we had to protect our allies? caller: um. a little bit. host: ok. michelle in maryland. thising of north korea, story today in the washington post about a video that was released by north korea yesterday. an anti-u.s. propaganda video where in it, the north koreans say the enemy to be destroyed is in our sites. the video comes at this particular time. this week, north korea conducted large-scale artillery drills showing off conventional weaponry that could easily reach seoul. president trump who has been urging china to apply pressure on north korea, has warned that the administration will act in beijing doesn't. robin in texas -- excuse me, don in texas. caller: let us consider where we are with north korea. after bill clinton got emissary, he sent an

what do we do in the long term, if anything. first, let's talk about the more immediate question. without that broader conversation, we are here and now looking at some states thinking about waivers, some states deciding now whether or not they are going to join the expansion. and so i'd like to ask all of our panelists where are we now and what are we likely to see happen? why don't we start with josh on that one, and then others can weigh in. >> sure. so thank you so much for having me this morning. so, first, i would say with a new administration it's, from a state perspective, it's a whole new world when it comes to what they can ask for flexibility for. so we have been involved in a number of conversations and heard from a number of governors and medicaid offices that they are thinking very differently than they have in the past about what they're going to ask for for flexibility from the federal government. so that's certainly, we can unpack that a little bit as we go. but there is a big discussion about plan designs and w

you, inattentive research that you do, do you also interact with people who are doing research on is not even how to describe it at this point. but on fertility of the soil. things that we might think of as being more quote confessional. are there as much resources being poured into the other time, the more traditional kind of farming. because it seems like the people any more than one magic bullet. you need a million, right? and to think of this as political, do you remain on different sides of the aisle or do those of you who are in plant science but not in the genetic modification part of it, do you interact with one another? >> there is no question about that. i can give you an example. i'm on the board of agriculture and the national advisory of science which advises the president on policies. we get together five times a year in washington. and we have traditional, agricultural economists, you name it, people who are involved in the whole system of agriculture. we are always interacting and trying to say how is this piece and that piece together and trying to get the best kinds

what do we do about the $1.3 billion in fmf? i think it would be disparting choice to simply go back to providing that unconditionally. it would just be helping egypt buy weapons that are ill-suited to meet the threats that it faces while re-enforcing that entitlement mentality and kicking the serious problems down the road again. another possibility would be to provide most of it continue with holding the 15% currently with held because of human rights abuses. that would send a modest signal of disapproval. not sure if it would do all that much good. the third option would be to step back and ask whether our investment in egypt is appropriate given the value we get from it and the crises and opportunities we face elsewhere. my strong view is that the investment is completely out of balance. does it really make sense for this government, which does so little for regional security, which consistently rejects our advice, describes us to its people as a hostile enemy, to receive such a disproportionate share of u.s. military aid? s

looking forward, what do we do about it? a lot of it is repairing roads, trails, and public land around the park, to make sure the restrooms are clean, the sewer systems work. when you're talking about a $12.5 billion backlog, i was at the transition office and i look at the park in front of the department of interior. the very park that they go by every day. the water fountains don't even work, and they are in need of repair. what about the rest of washington, d.c.? it turns out the very few fountains work. you look at the memorial bridge that goes across to arlington, that needs $150 million, so he better get on it. ms. cantwell: we are time, but i will get back to this question. there's been a lot of question about your viewpoint and resolutions amp up forms and houseboat about -- houseboat and federal lands staying in federal hands but we will come back to that in the second round. >> originally an appointee of the obama administration and was confirmed unanimously to his current post on february 13. he had been serving

i have been doing what i have been doing 14 years. going to say, oh, everything changed overnight. i think that's an advantage my successor had. >> rose: so he got a fresh look. >> yeah, and i think he's den a great job with that. it's different but how you're perceived is important to how well you do. that's number two. number three, i will point out that the hot products they're promoting today we all started on my watch. i feel pretty good about that. number four, i want to see mr. profit growth. profit really hasn't grown enough since i left, and i know in the tech world today not making money is cool and you get high market caps, but i'm still a big believer in profit growth. >> rose: is that the proudest thing you did in terms of, say, the last -- in terms of your tenure, how you made the huge lift in profits? >> i think i'd say yes, but i would also say, you know, we started xbox, we started bing, we started sur fas, azure and office 365 all on my watch, very proud of that, and the team in place today was largely the team we ha

and they do. there are a lot of bills that have passed through the republican-held house since i've been there that simply died in the senate even though the republicans controlled the senate. and so, when day abandoned the filibuster rule to get judge gorsuch through, i was disappointed because it means a dismantling of the kind of bipartisan spirit that you are used to in the u.s. senate. that is a long discussion, what you brought up but thank you for the question. how are you going to prevent this president from bankrupting our country with travel costs for his family and himself? [ applause ] i'm open to your ideas on that. [ laughter ] >> we hear about it every single day about it. we're americans. we have short attention spans. every single day. >> everybody hear that? that is the correct answer. the correct answer is that we have to raise our voices together, if that's the way we feel about it. and don't stop. >> [ inaudible question ]. in the white house? >> the renewable energy job secto

they're going to ask, what do you want to do? and i don't think we have a good answer to that right now. >> shadi, you have been really outspoken in your critiques of american policy in syria, which i think you view as a sort of both moral and strategic failure thus far. how do you understand what appears to be on the table tonight? >> so i support strikes, but i don't think that we should do something just for the sake of doing something. and i think the problem is this very narrow focus on chemical weapons. to me, this isn't about chemical weapons. it's about the assad regime's brutality. and i think there has to be a broader strategic vision. so i'm someone who has been outspoken in favor of targeting the assad regime for quite some time now. but i worry trump wants to go in, do some punitive strikes, leave it at that, forget about syria and then we're not addressing the root causes of the broader conflict. so what i would like to see is a focus on using military force to push assad to negotiate in good faith, to force him to