mean look i think if someone especially younger person is passionate about something in politics i don't think that almost any focus should be downplayed or should be disregarded or asked or are discouraged i mean the parties have changed. which parties have been in power historically have changed we didn't have democrats and republicans in the country started and there have been third parties that have done well in the past i think that there are incredible structural hurdles to it i think of there's lots of reasons that it's unlikely to happen but that doesn't mean that people shouldn't fight for it i would say that if you want to see more third party representation across the country i think that working for one third party is not the best way to do that i think working to change the way we run our elections to do things like rank choice voting or approval voting something like that will benefit a third party you support will also benefit other potential third parties in the future that's the foundational change that needs to happen so the rank voti

>> i think that's right. there is --ling them -- -- there is a pretty stable turf the right people can work out between those two ideas because i don't think they're diametrically opposed. i think the smart people would say make sure we have guardrails. argue over the guardrails. now the current legislation says give states money but don't require them to spend it on low-income people. >> rose: guardrails are what in this case? > to give you an example, in the senate legislation, states can apply for waiver, take all the money going for tax credits to low-income people, they can spend it on whatever they want. they don't have to spend it on health care. >> rose: can they spend it on tax cuts? >> on anything they like. so i think you find a lot of people, not just democrats, very uncomfortable with that. but if you said, look, let the states meet a goal and the goal is to figure out ways to treat a they spend that money withong that population and furthering the cause, let them go to down in all the ways as lon

it's very dangerous to go that route and i do think this is a moment we need to see as i do i think. north korea there's it's dangerous but i think one can find a way to negotiate and you have a new leader in south korea who was just in washington at the end of last month very interesting who wants to find a way to engage north korea the hope is at some point to denuclearize that region but i don't think that's in the cards the new york times this morning concluded with its cover story on north korea that. he may be mad and use twitter too often and not have enough to do with his time the leader of north korea but he looks out and sees what happened to the libyan dictator moammar qaddafi after negotiations with the european union the united states he gave up his nuclear program do i need to tell you what happened to him he was deposed regime change we witness a failed state in libya now so i think i might conclude the turning point was when george w. bush came in the greatest debacle was the iraq war the second might have been and this is according to robert gallucci who was the stat

i think it is very important. the trump administration goes through with its plan to reduce to less than 50,000 the number of refugees let in, that sends a terrible message around the world. i was in uganda last month. they have one million refugees from south sudan. the average income is $952 per year. uganda is saying we will take them and look after them until they can go home. there is an important lesson there. wilfred: in terms of something i've seen you talk about recently, the level of the issue you feel is underestimated because the length of displacement people experience has risen sharply. david: that's a good point. the average refugees out of their own country now for 10 years. suddenly issues of employment , and education become absolutely central. the humanitarian sector does not invest in education. less than 2% of the global humanitarian budget goes to education. you have millions of kids displaced from their homes by conflict, become refugees, and they are not able to get education. one of the th

i think the markets have already digested that. think about this they know we're going to get probably one more rate hike this year, maybe two next year. that takes the fed funds rate to # the% if you had a modestly steep yield curve and 125 basis points between the fed funds rate and the ten-year, that would give you 3.25, maybe even make it 3.5 on the ten-year. that's not going to stifle this economy. that's what the moain point is and 2013, we touched 3% on the ten year, narcotics fl sthe mar out, but the world kept turning. and the last thing i want to point out is on inflation, joe, i think you alluded to this, you just don't have it, right? and it's not so much wage inflation. wage inflation, i think you've got a reverse phillips curve going on here. because commodity prices are so low, because gasoline and heating oil prices are so low, that's why workers aren't demanding higher wages just a thought steve? >> i don't know where rick's been living the last ten years, i guess, chicago but almost certainly the fed would do it ag

i don't think that's fair. i don't think that makes sense. i'd much rather use direct taxpayer funds, let's use warren buffett's taxes and not some 30-year-old who is struggling and just beginning her career. don't double her premiums to cross subsidize other people. that's what obamacare does. it's wildly unfair. >> i think one of the issues is that people say you don't have enough money to subsidize middle class people. who would only be going to low income. i do have to move on. >> george, let me point out that that's not accurate. you have two different sources of federal taxpayer funds on the exchanges, number one, the tax credits that are key directly to premium prices but, number two, the senate bill has over 100 billion dollars in funds for the stabilization fund that are designed to stabilize those premiums. the objective has to be, and i think the way we get this done is focus on lowering premiums. if we're lowering premiums, it's a win/win for everybody. >> i think the question is would that be enough? what happens -- i know you ho

>> well, i think folks are focused on easy today. icularly those who have some disposable income. and certainly the preference i see among urban young individuals is towards those already prepared meals that are ready to just eat. i think if you're having kind of those once or twice a month special occasions where you want to invest a little bit more time, i think you may do the blue apron approach. i think it will be a mix i think the audience that this -- these companies are going after focuses on ease. they really do >> interesting point it's going to be a while before we know the answer to. that moving ton a new topic. part original content, part ai showcase apple is out with a new short movie starring the rock and siri >> hey, siri, show me lines of my fashion line. what do you >> what do you think. >> oh, i think it's show time. everything in life is made up of four elements, wind, fire, water, rock. >> siri. to chef, i want to cook. how many ounces in a secentilitr >> messy give me some siri, play my practice play list >> rock

so i think that that is going to be the issue. despite the fact that republicans want to get it done, it's a very difficult problem to solve with many different competing interests in washington. i don't think it will be as easy perhaps. host: our guests are patrick ruffini, republican pollster, and michael bocian, democratic pollster and what is ahead for the 115th congress and president in terms of politics. input.ome your we say pollsters, but let me get specific. what are typically the kind of clients that both of you work with and what kind of work do you do for them? guest: so we work with democratic candidates for office, progressive ballot initiatives, and really what we do -- the polling that most people see is the plick polling done by -- public polling done by the media. we ask them, what do you want to run on and we help them figure out ways to take the many issues they care about and condense it into something that's digestible because it's hard for people to follow 25 point plans. so that's really what we help them do

tim: well, i don't think about it very much. what would i say? i will point out that steve's dna will always be the dna of apple, or it will be as long as i am ceo. and i think as long as anyone is, honestly. i think it is deeply embedded in the company and we celebrate it. and it should be like that and should stay like that. obviously, things evolve over time in some other areas as they would have if he were sitting here interviewing with you today. that is probably a better question to ask somebody who worked for both of us. emily: you said cars are an area ripe for disruption. how important is it that apple not miss out on cars? tim: i think there is a major disruption looming there, not only for self driving cars, but also the electrification. if you have driven an all-electric car, it is actually a marvelous experience. it is a marvelous experience not to stop at the gas station, or fillings nation or whatever you call it, and so -- plus, you -- gas station or filling station or whatever you want to call it. plus, you have ridesharing on to

i don't think they would have published that without solid evidence so i don't think they can release the actual evidence because that could reveal sensitive sources and methods you know in the u.s. system is as you've probably seen has had a lot of leaks many people in the u.s. government who are unhappy with things are going off and leak to the media so i think if there were any reason to doubt this conclusion there would likely be people within the u.s. system going to the media in terms of me lending my expertise to to russian propaganda i think i do think that r.t. is propaganda arm of the russian government and helps to spread. information that helps advance russia's interests and so that's why i think it's important for people like me to come on if it weren't me it would be somebody who was less capable who had maybe. two has got a job presenting the american point of view well and three are very grateful for you spending some time it does but since you mention decent for mation i just want to ask you ask you to give us one specific just one specific example of the dissent from

i was thinking -- >> do you want to -- no, i was thinking we order papa john's. >> the sensation i get from sex and eating pizza is interchangeable for me at this point. >> these issues may seem trivial, they need to be addressed. >> where do you think we go from here? >> i don't know. what if we turned all our fights into songs? let's start a band. >> great neighbor. hi, dave. i was in a band myself. what was it called? it was called myself, a solo percussive group. you know -- >> uh-huh. let's make a list, our top ten fights of all time. dishes is big, obviously. >> i think you can be a little judgmental. >> you being laysy. 're uptight. distracted. play a song. ♪ this wasn't meant to be a dude ♪ ♪ that you can aggravate ♪ you get so rude ♪ you've got to change your attitude ♪ ♪ . >> dave? unreal. i can't relate to the lyrics at all. >> i loved it. this is it. looks like you two are up. embarrassing. that's what every husband wishes their wife would do. >> i spent my childhood trying to save my parents' marriage, i don't want to spend my adulthood trying to save yours. >> we're just

i think it's healthy. and i support him in it. >> was he not happy with the direction you were setting? >> look, i mean, i think bringing in fresh face, fresh people is a good thing. so, look, he has the best political instincts. he's -- hang on a second. >> yeah. >> he knows, i think, intuitively when things need to change. i've seen it now for a year and a half on this wild ride with the president that i loved being a part of. but he intuitively determined that it was time to do something differently. and i think he's right. >> but it's only been six months, not very long. when you say he wanted to do things differently, tell us precisely what he said to you, why he wants to do things differently and why you concluded that didn't include you. >> i'm not going to get into that personal stuff. the president is a professional, and i'm a professional and professional people don't discuss private conversations in public. but what i will tell you is this president has the hearts of all americans at the top of h

>> i think on the reset we were pretty skeptical from the start. i remember getting yelled at by obama people who were upset at us for being so skeptical. you know, when we said, these are relatively minor policy concessions that russia has made that the trump team thought is the biggest thing since sliced bread, they would get mad at us back. i remember phone calls from the white house about a meeting with putin and st. petersburg and i mischaracterized and that in fact putin was never planning to have a genuine reset with obama, didn't respect obama. signing that we would see this president now going to meet with putin. you know, the press is appropriately skeptical because we have been through this before and seen it before and we understand that putin doesn't see the world the way america sees it. u. so i want to close this by getting back to obama and what you think his legacy will be. obviously, trump is setting out to undo both legislatively and by executive order what he can do of some of obama's accomplishments. what do you think will withs

mike: i don't think i have any questions. i do want to add something for fred, who is not here to defend himself. senator hadd the their differences here and there, but he was a great respecter of you, senator. this idea that somehow he was given documents and questions to be asked as some sort of puppet is nonsensical. he was an accomplished trial lawyer. i had been a trial lawyer, a federal prosecutor for five years. so had howard. and it is correct that the white house did give and tried to give -- and fred would throw them in the trash or look at them and see if they had some value and he would proceed as the great lawyer and individual that he is. i wanted the record clear with regard to that. ms. stahl: excellent. is scott here? >> it's a response to some other things. people have forgotten a couple of things that are contextually important. after dean had testified and we heard from the attorney general and still there was no corroboration, we started doing satellite witnesses, people who were not principles, but one o

you know it's not really in this case i think an argument so much about the. need to these basic issues that we've been talking but it was also an argument i mean what was work was at stake beginning in the ukrainian discussion there was the association agreements with the european union and there's a trade agreements that are very very technical dry stuff and it's important for ukraine. to be able to participate in the. big european markets i suggest but i think you would agree with me that the that dry technical issues have been framed as a marshall largest civilizational choice for the ukrainians either with backward russia or with this glorious euro bad that leads me i guess to my final question because i do want to ask you about the russia's place in europe and the worst in the world in general i was watching your lecture on bracks it did reach you describe how the u.k. sees itself in europe with them but not all of them and that's strikes me rather similar to how russia relates to europe with the west in general but north of the west do you think europe c

i think what troubled me a little bit this time was h.r. ster, national security adviser, who's somebody who i u really do admire, i think is a real grown-up in the white house, that he seemed to defer to that and suggested that president trump didn't really have an agenda going into the putin meeting because, you know, putin is going to have an agenda. >> yeah. robin, i'm going to put up this poll because this is a pbs/npr/marist college poll, shows 54% of americans think trump's dealings with russia were unethical or illegal. if you're the president or someone advising the president, don't you look at those numbers, at that number, and think that you have to confront putin about it? even if it's a short meeting, as you said? >> well, i think it will be brought up but i think it will probably be in some nuanced way rather than a confrontation saying as president obama did, cut it out, that there will be an effort to diplomatically or kind of slide around but bake sure it's bart of the discussion. it's going to be a very tricky part of the c

i think there may be double jeopardy. i don't think i will get in trouble for saying it again since i messed up once. there was this wonderful moment during my presentation of credentials. i used to work in the internet industry. we talked about technology. i commented because i came in with a top hat and coat, unusual for an american, all these people snapping pictures. the queen said they always used to have cameras to take a picture, but now it is really different. they have these phones and they always stay over their eyes. she said i miss seeing their eyes. that really struck me. looking at that, you could think this is a one-way thing. the head of state and people snapping pictures. but there is a two-way connection happening and that connection matters. that really stuck with me. >> that is a wonderful memory. david, the leader of your former party -- >> it is not my former party. >> questioning the relevance of the monarchy, would it be a mistake to get rid of the monarchy? >> the remarkable thing about the queen i

>> i think the second part of your question is easy. e $34 billion of investor money has found gld the easy way. as far as what should investors on think about, i think these prices are relatively cheap. we're slightly below the middle of the trading range which has been in place since 2013 so this is to me an opportunity to either establish for the first time or tostrategic alloc. i like five. i think gold is a jen are wigen investment >> i might agree with that, but i want gold. etf? if the worst comes to worse, zombie beingso apocalypse, north korea, whatever it is, you will be bribing the border guards with your statement that says i own these stupid etfs? what good is that? >> are you going to keep it in stocks, are you going to show them your stock certificate into microsoft and apple? same deal. >> no, that's the reason you own the metal itself >> if you are a believer in apocalypse, you want lead he encased in brass you can buy that with gold or currency >> or you could to have a glock and take what you need probably. >> there yo

look at where they trade, i still think there's opportunity there. saw that paper mike was talking about today. that's reason enough >> thank you, mike for more options action, check out the full show tomorrow 5:30 p.m. eastern time >> mike must be getting hungry he's not been at the chinese restaurant >> at least a week >> coming up, call of disaster newly public blue apron tanking more than 8% today 19% from its wall street debut just last week is this casting an ominous cloud on the ipo market? we'vgoe t a special report more "fast money" coming up. hey gary, what'd you got here? this bad boy is a mobile trading desk so that i can take my trading platform wherever i go. you know that thinkorswim seamlessly syncs across all your devices, right? oh, so my custom studies will go with me? anywhere you want to go! the market's hot! sync your platform on any device with thinkorswim. only at td ameritrade the power of the nasdaq market. the power of 100 of the world's top companies. the power of an etf. the power of qqq. the thinking we put in, clients ge

i don't, i think i got that. and after the, again, after i turned in the manuscript and that video of him berating the driver, that became a viral sensation and he said he needed to grow up. i pointed out toward the end of the book this was a man who had recently entered his decade same. so by the way, i also wrote on uber that the driver recognized he had the ceo of uber in the back seat and started to give him the business. he said you don't understand, i can't get my emails answered on that and they did an email, he said i'm going to follow up with you and very quickly late at night he copied me on email and i later said did you do that because i was in the backseat and of course not, i do that all the time. >> absolutely.>> what do you think gets to the culture, that there's sex in every company we cover but nothing of this magnitude and one thing things didn't really change at uber because last week we wrote about this india thing which pushed it over the edge. for those who don't know, they got the medical

i think i just got an f from you. (upbeat music) (upbeat music) matt lewis, welcome. - good to be here. - good to see you, so this book, great book was published during the republican primary so it's 18 months ago, plus or minus, as we sit here today. were you right, as you look back, to be worried about conservatism? - absolutely. so it came out in january 2016, right before the iowa caucuses so i started writing this maybe in 2014 and wrote a lot of it in 2015. - and god, who could have predicted in 2014 and 2015 where we'd be today? - right, so donald trump wasn't even running when i first started writing this book, but even without donald trump, i saw that there were problems in conservatism, that there was an identity crisis. and i think what we're seeing right now is the manifestation of that. conservatism, is it populist, does it believe in free trade or does it believe in protectionism? this is just one issue that we're still wrestling over. - right, let's get the big one out of the way, is donald trump a cons

i think western europe is still trying to understand donald trump a little bit better but i think irrespectivef the polls being allowed to purchase patriot missile think is a very important step. it was something that president bush very much was for and was promoting the obama administration didn't necessarily see it that way. they took it off the table so i think for president trump to go there and offer that up it was important. >> we saw some protests in the streets and let's be honest you see protests any time g20 rolls around so it's not necessarily spurred by the u.s. or anything like that. the world leaders in one place and people want to get their voices heard but there's always been a lot of talk about the world standing and where the u.s. stands in the eyes of other nations and, you know, some people say well who cares, it's our destiny, not theirs. how much face does president trump have to t-, what's the game face that he has to come in here because obviously with the move he made getting out of the paris accord, with some of the things he said in the past, is it important for him

i think it's appropriate about our position is. expressed in that those demands are presented i guess i wouldn't suddenly be in favor of excluding anybody. the summit to not talking to them but it really is important to make sure that discussions are not just between the top reaches but between societies as a whole now america now has a very unusual president i mean donald trump would step out at any gathering but i think i've seen a number of experts m.p.'s critics suggest that for the first time in in a number of months they they saw him acting presidential at the g twenty summit would you give him credit for that i did he certainly capable of acting presidential a and we've found some movements in the post where many many people a wide range of commentators in the united states have said that those presidential but the problem is that his behavior is really rather inconsistent. there are really very very different messages that come out from day to day so that i think for that reason they're also it's really important not to just

i think the u.s. . russia relationship is very important and it has suffered and we need to make it better there's no question about it we need to cooperate on so many issues on nuclear weapons on syria on iran on energy on trade so how do you see her in relation. in this paradigm one you know there is so much antagonism against russia but yet americans feel like the relationship to improve what's the technical thing to do because of trauma goes on easing sanctions against russia so that is not going to be ok with that so what's going to play out well i think we're sanctions should be maintained because of russia's action in the ukraine. russia's involvement with. the election i think of russia changes its be a viewer. you change the sanctions now that does that mean there are other areas where you cooperate i think you're seeing maybe a little more cooperation on syria. i think the president has felt that the russian relationship is needs to be improved i think he should be supported on that at all as

>> well, look, i think the line is pretty clear. think we need anything else. >> well, we have republicans in congress who -- you know, talking about a health care bill -- >> more complicated. >> here's the russian thing that i think you will see a vivid illustration of it. are sanctions going to get removed or not? there's a sanctions bill going through. it's being deliberated. something that would not have been a controversial thing is now a controversial thing. the white house is still a little nebulous where this will end up. but if we end up not adding further sanctions or removing the sanctions that are already in place against russia, which is a apart from seeing nato crumble is the single most central policy goal that vladimir putin has with respect to the united states. if we see that happen, i think you would have to be really either incredibly stupid or willfully blind not to be able to say, okay, this is the -- this is the policy piece of the -- if there's a quid pro quo, here it is. >> the white house would have to not

was perfectly acceptable and i think that was one of the strategic reasons why he went to war so first again he's answering to his critics in a way but i thought the speech was very interesting because whose values was he talking about and what does the west mean according to donald trump well. i was expecting to get disappointed because the last country where you go we want to improve relations with russia support the plan or. direct us was clear and he made a few phrases skipper after a few phrases that will cut infuriated for example the soviet leadership russia is so patient now that he has a talk about you know soviets and nonces in slave and poor and putting up signs of equality between the narcisse and the communists it not so much noticed here what was really astounding was he is phrase that the board has never known the community of them all were community of nations and he was not speaking about the present. in the united states he was talking about christianity so it wasn't in the rebellion because the west now is not a christian or nationalist dictatorship. it is our. goal

and i think you stick with this trade. i don't think you get out of it. but as they get into these expensive stocks, i think it's wise to maybe switch over into the options, brian >> josh, mcdonald's, flying past your $130 level. stock has soared 20% since your bullish call you sticking with it >> yeah, look, i think this name can work its way higher. i think it's gotten a lot of cooperation from the fact that large-cap, high-quality growth companies with good balance sheets that are returning cash to shareholders and growing earnings are what people are buying all year. i mean, that's -- look at all the quantitative breakdowns of what's working, mcdonald's checks almost every box. i don't see why it couldn't continue, unless there's some kind of a big shift in sentiment away from high-quality or away from large-cap u.s >> okay, jim, back in april, you said that everybody out there should own alphabet/google the stock has risen 13% since then lucky 13 keep going higher? or sell it, take your profit, and move on? >> i keep it here, and i think you can buy

and i think a massive mistake. i mean the government has enough problems. i don't think that we want democrats forcing government to take over more of our healthcare system. i think that's the last thing that we need and certainly i think the last thing that americans want. the last thing that they are looking for is to have the government more involved in their day-to-day decisions on healthcare and that's exactly what a single pair system would do. inaction is simply not an option at this point. and senate republicans need to step up and they need to make sure that we peel and replace obamacare with a system that functions and a system that's sustainable. ainsley: i heard last night on one of the shows, it was someone talking about how the senators and the house members, if this didn't pass, if this doesn't get repealed and replaced, which is what they all ran on, then they are going to put the blamen the president. is the president going to take the blame for it or does he think that it's congress' fault if this actually doesn't get done? >> i think this

i think it makes the white house look weak. >> interesting >> i understand what steve's saying i think anthony scaramucci went in knowing reince priebus would be out the whole thing doesn't add up to steve's point about timeline. i agree general kelly in there is great if you learned anything over the last six months to a year about president trump, he doesn't answer to anybody but himself. as much as you love general kelly to come in and are restore order, the president is going to keep doing what he's doing which is not the focus of the show what's interesting, the vix still closed lower on the day which is remarkable, you know, the market is till intact. there are warning signs, though. >> yeah, look, we're getting -- we still have important earnings to come through. it's been a very good earnings season but we're starting to see some of those bellwether sectors fade certainly nasdaq is the weakest transports, or certainly i think in trouble i think you get to a place where bold bear confidence, if you measured it last week, at extreme highs, complacency runs extreme highs. the fact

>> that would be wonderful. .t sure could i think it is unlikely, i think we are still in a very sadly situation on the hill and in the country. , i thinkhe reason is of it of the flaws in republican thinking and our approach to health care is they are really two corehandicapped by philosophical beliefs. one is that the free market is always better and the federal government can't do anything right. as long as you're in that mindset, finding a governmental approach is going to be really difficult if you don't believe the government can do anything and are only interested getting the government out of the now,cular field like right many republicans are trying to do with the air traffic control system. ideological bias that has made it very difficult for governors to reflect -- govern effectively. >> this very long we began the democrats saying that a might run on 2015. democrats and number of discrete policy proposals they would vote on and did vote on. how much more do you think democrats need to put together for 2018? should discrete bills you can get a vote on if they have the majori

i think we're close, i believe the same thing about net neutrality. the question is under what regulation of the going to bring that about? i think chairman pai is rightfully focused on investment and how do we make sure that we incent investment in these new 5g networks, and so is taking a look at it and we appreciate him doing that. the .. under a 1970s law that was designed for monopoly telephones. it regulates costs, rates, terms, conditions. even regulates what information can be put into a telephone book. that is not be innovative internet that we think of and we want to see flourish in the united states. so i think the fcc is on a great role. we all worry about net neutrality, the wireless industry welcomes net neutrality rules and i'm really hopeful and optimistic that we can see congress there. >> would you like to see a new telecom bill? is it time to revamp the fcc? >> certainly we need to think about broadband and how we want broadband to be regulated. >> what about the fcc itself? >> think of it as taking apart the congress needs to step

hand to calm the waters i think just by necessi necessity. rankly by virtue of the fact that we've got troops on both sides and interests militarily on all sides of this. so i don't see it going that way and i don't think it's in anybody's interests including the parties who feel so aggrieved on both sides of this equation to move toward military escalation. in terms of the u.s. line, you know, one of the criticisms you've heard is there have been mixed messages coming out of washington. you have had the state department calling for a calming of the waters, resolution calmly, what seems to be from the white house a firmer embrace of the saudis and that side and a bit more of a tougher stance. so i think there has been a danger of mixed signals coming out of washington and i think it behooves us to have not only a common voice on this, but the role of peace maker not because we want to be the moral giants here, although i think we do, but because we've got real fundamental interests at play short and long-term. that means having the countries r

i think she probably thinks it's ok i don't know i don't know how much you joys it depends who's who say it you know have a little baby daughter right yeah to your vision wise doctor and then dr singh is in comparative literature she's we met at rutgers university so she will you know doctorates and i was getting my master's in acting when he was a new jersey boy from south carolina knows when doors where the rockers yeah my first taste of the north we play a little game of if you only knew i just some questions that you thought was your childhood celebrity crush. danica mckellar see good talent who i'm. cooking pushing you trade places with for a day. you weed is job you've ever had. was working at labor ready labor ready where you work for a day and he would stand on a corner as the corner of goats as a lot was but you get a job for a day minimum wage eight hours show me license you and whoever else is able bodied persons ready usually it's cons people who are a lot off adriel you do anything it's all you do you pick a rocket it's a typical box. guilty pleasure guilty pleasure. pro

>> i don't think we will go there. say to the congressman that there are a lot of states in the country that would initiate, past, and execute an individual mandate. charlie: thank you very much. thank the panel. [applause] [indiscernible] ♪ >> we're in the middle of the asian trading day. welcome to bloomberg markets asia. the highs and lows of business, surging chips and a successful smartphone help samsung to a new record. the flipside is a collapse of noble shares plunging again on the profit warnings of 78% this year. the $10 billion ticket taking foxconn to america, terry gross saying it is a win-win. allident trump says it is down to him. treasuries a little mixed in the asia session after they climbed overnight. sank, thatthe dollar is all to do with the fed and what a lot of people thought was inflation outlook. inflation expectations have been driven a lot by the 10 year yield. this chart will show you exactly that, although since last month, since around may or the beginning of last month we've seen that rela

i think we need dialogue. we need dialogue with everybody. >> sure. >> i had a great -- it was a great g20, you had 20 countries. i got along, i think, really fantastically with the head of every country. >> a sha, i want to get your reaction to what the president just said. >> one of the things that's really concerned me since these e-mails were released yesterday is that basically we can assume that the russian government has had these e-mails or known the contents of them for the last year, and even if the president, if we give him the benefit of the doubt, that he had no idea that this meeting took place or that these exchanges happened, jared kushner did, and so did donald trump jr., even though he's not an official member of the administration, and jared, anyway, is a senior adviser to the president. so, again, you have this foreign influence, a sword of damacles hanging over people that could be revealed and used against them and i think it calls into question any kind of dialogue, as approximathe presid

shy and i think when i started singing and performing that really brought me out. i got to be loud i mean people out of times say that i have this voice that doesn't seem to go with my the way i look and i'm small and whatever but i know again my mom so that when i was born i was less than four pounds primi and but you couldn't tell by my voice everyone knew i was there screaming really loud so it's been always that way and then i started listening to hanson discovered hanson that is really the reason i wanted to be a singer songwriter. because i was like oh they are so young and they're doing this and started learning how to harmonize with my sister and then. with a guitar and. resident history. the songwriting where a lot of people started singing and then you get to songwriting what inspired you to start writing. well ok from the beginning i had already been writing songs with my sister like in our tree house on the farm we wrote our first song when we were three i think it was about being cold and wanting to go inside and and i actually wrote that melody of tha

i think vs naipaul has been a very great influence on me. d a lot of speculative and science fiction and imaginative fiction. a very underrated writer called m john harrison, who thinks very carefully about form. so, m john harrison once said in an interview that always think of what it is that a genre cannot do, and then push it in that direction. i think it's current in my heart, that's a great lesson. and science—fiction writers can imagine things, or they want to imagine things, that others don't. on a cosmic scale, it goes without saying. and that appeals to you, because you seem to believe that the planet would do a lot better without any of us around. yes, this is a central theme of a lot of speculative and science—fiction writers now. saying actually, you know, if you take out the humans as a species, maybe very peacefully and quickly so that there is no pain, i think that the planet would be doing a lot better. it can recover, ifeel. so, when you finished the book, does that mean there was no sense of elation, that you still felt tra

and i think i knew the 1%. [laughter] these are people who would never -- but they would never say that to a pollster. but there was this sense that george w. bush is supporting the first arab spring, which was happening in 2004, 2005. more people were protesting. there was a sense of optimism at least among elites. but these were also people who historically were very suspicious of the u.s. so they were like, wait, is george w. bush improving this? but then again we know the history. and again, so there's almost like internal struggle as people try make sense of what they feel about the u.s. tarun: i wanted to raise yesterday's supreme court decision to hear arguments regarding the immigration ban. this was covered in the survey. disapproval of the administration's immigration restrictions was quite pronounced, unsurprisingly. 77% opposed in turkey. 73% in indonesia. 96% for jordan from your perspective, what would be the impact of the decision to allow portions of the -- of the ban to stand? pending a full he

when i think about the fact that our c.e.o. mike du made over twenty million dollars last year more than one thousand times the average wal-mart a says c.n.n. with all due respect i have to say i don't think that's right. is that just how a free market works. people went from pretty simple financial lives pre nine hundred eighty to the point now where people are. just totally submerged in their financial accounts and they're all in debt and what exactly devoid society that from the whatever the government tried to do it wasn't nicely maybe. it might be making things worse. by saying this is not how capitalism works this is all carpet lism goes hopelessly disastrously wrong. in case you're new to the game but this is how it works not the economy is built around corporate corporations run washington or washington controls the media the media control the voters elect the businessman to run this country business equals power. must it's not business as usual it's business like it's never been done before. this. was. it was. kind of i