not mean he does not know his name. the hardest job he has is making calls like that. appalling what the congresswoman has done and the way she has politicized this issue. the way that she is trying to make this about something that it isn't. this is a president who loves her country very much, who has the greatest level of respect for men and women in uniform, who wanted to offer condolences to the family. to try to create something from that that the congresswoman is doing is frankly appalling and disgusting. >> what did she say about the mission? >> i'm not going to get into the details of that action. as i said before i'm not going to get into the deep he deals -- the details of that action. >> setting aside the congresswoman. setting aside the discussion about the politicized nation, the woman who raised sergeant johnson said she felt like her son had been disrespected. i'm not asking you any of that. said that,somebody is the president reconsidering the way he communicates? did general kelly cobbs -- counsel him d

for what purpose does the gentleman from ride seek recognition? -- from rhode island seek recognition? without objection, the gentleman s recognized for one minute. mr. langevin: mr. speaker, 15 years ago this week, congress passed the help america vote act which provided much needed federal aid to overhaul our aging election infrastructure. i was proud to support this investment in our elections which helped states to ex-pabbed opportunities for all americans to cast ballots and know they were properly counted. unfortunately today much of our election infrastructure is in need of a refresh. among many challenges, russia mounted a direct attack on our elections and it's imperative we shore up our defenses. i introduced the paper act with congressman meadows to prvide states with resources to assess the security risk posed to their election systems and implement cybersecurity best practices including post-election audits of paper ballots. mr. speaker, it is time to recommit to this. i urge my colleagues to pass the paper act and restore the integri

be does a decision like this, does it make the law work less better? is that a good thing to do at this moment since congress couldn't come up with a replacement? >> i think you are asking the wrong person. i did not agree with the health care law. so i just as soon not have it. so having said that, what we saw is governors are best to handle their people themselves with their budgets themselves in the way that's best appropriate. what we have said is the federal government can't fix these things. so i think what that we saw was action from the president. that's what every governor wanted to see. you will see every governor step up and do what is in the best interest of their people. >> and finally back to your ambassador duties. on cuba, john kelly at the podium was asked about what's been happening to american diplomats in cuba. he had a very cryptic response. and he simply said this, we believe that the cuban government could stop the attacks on our diplomats. but we have never accused the cuban government of being behind it. does that imply we know

no matter how much noise these few make it does not mean they can do it and there does not seem to bethat to happen. she's been hanging on by herfingertips all summer hanging on by herfingertips all summerand into hanging on by herfingertips all summer and into the autumn and people can hang on for quite a long time. getting sore by now! how much pressure are you under by your editors do come up with a headline that will put a time frame on it? that must be quite a scary thing. they always want answers, when, who, what will happen next. if you do a lesson of who will be the next prime ministers you would have five frontrunners and a number who fancy their own chances. theresa may's greatest weakness in the election was her popularity. she was so far ahead in the polls that a lot of people, labour pundits, a lot of people, labour pundits, a lot of people didn't want her to have such power and back labour. now her greatest strength is the flank that the tory party is so weak in talent to become instant prime minister is that she is the only option for them -- is that she is the only opt

does anyone seek recognition and opposition? if not, all-time as expired. all in favor? all opposed? in the opinion of the chair the aye's habit and the amendment is agreed to. next amendment is key number four. does anyone seek recognition and opposition? if not, proponents recognized the fort 30 seconds. >> mr. chairman, this is side-by-side with the amendment just past and simply states-- i see it as amendment to the amendment because it provides that there should be analysis of what are needed to help people enter the workforce if they are recipients of these programs such as childcare, healthcare and job-training opportunities. >> time has expired. i will oppose the amendment and the question is on the amendment all in favor? all opposed? in the opinion of the chair the nose habit any amendment is is not agreed to. next man is sanders number two. one minute remaining for brief stated earlier and i oppose the amendment. does anyone else seek recognition in opposition? seeing none, senator that-- senator sanders, 30 seconds.

does it get renegotiated, how does it get serviced, and what does it look like going forward, because the cash flow behind servicing that debt is really the question for me. >> that's right. and this is one of the things that sort of changes the whole paradigm of what we're dealing with super storm maria over here you don't have cash -- we're not going to have a lot of cash. we need to use it to attend the emergency. we want to use it effectively. listen, i've been in the administration for eight months and already slashed $1.8 billion off our budget in puerto rico. we can make changes in government to make sure it's a more effective economy, to put things into the private sector's hands so they can develop it it is still there. but we need to recognize it. >> reporter: one message to bondholders if you can give it to them now? >> my one message to bondholders, we're all one right now. what we need to go is go to congress, ask for a real aid package for puerto rico, and make sure that we can have the initial conditions so that we can get out of the emergency phase, but start rebuildin

but in most of the place today we have seen does epidemics on their rights i see. that i'm in to waste on our lies death to one off their ways that i see. we weep but are going to seem wait on bio med school and science you know but we didn't the progress in the same way fight the system being discrimination don't. you see it that tomorrow that's the cultists today some sex relationship is penalize that by law you know them india is watch food in there put them you know is sick and this is the end to end is this becoming mahdi a martyr from the mental challenge death display venting us to move the bin duffey hiv so sites that do not think that being a homosexual min being allowed to have been is a pass on that injecting drugs a migrant that but he is on there did the caustic with that they cannot but he does if a democrat don't does not work then that is a sure you know exclusion and they try. they come to get in of indigo if you want you grew. up harming just that particular group but why society as well because a i don't think anyone can actually solve that. soon

you know he does it, everyone does it but he does.s one thing for him to have done it as a businessman, to just say things, make up stuff. but it's at a different level you'd think as president. >> i just think that when he's in that aroused state, when he is feeling under threat, he makes to distinction between true and not true. in that moment he believes it's true. you take what he said about corker and it's almost exactly the reverse is true. in that moment he's saying to himself, this guy, he wouldn't listen to me, he didn't get it. so he absolutely believed it in that moment. and it didn't matter because he must mobilize all resources necessary to fight off the enemy in that moment. so that's what's scary is that he experiences the world as a global threat to him. meanwhile, he's holding us, and i really believe this, he is holding america hostage right now. hostage to his own impus sift. we know if it goes this way or that way, the consequences could be literally millions of deaths. >> all right guys appreciate it. >>> up next,

but he does make that connection. does he do it later? yes. was it something that was central prior to the war? no. he is one of the more prominent founders to take a very active stand. i say yes, he does. obviously there is an inherent complication. student: i wanted to pick up on that question. one of the things that was interesting about this is how you can map this new idea of honor on to the material politics and the high politics of the revolutionary break. i wonder if you are suggesting that his central to the evolution of this new idea, or if that is an implication of it? what, for instance, does the story look like if you pace the economic and social foundation of the story? isn't this new idea of honor really derivative of patterns of landholding, the emergence of the new market, the economy, the relative weakness in the united states as a central institution and so forth? the political story is an outgrowth of that social and economic foundation. smith: i mentioned this very point of my introduction because i have been asked this qu

sarah: he does, yes. reporter: you have spoken to him since those -- [inaudible] -- sarah: i believe so. i'll have to verify. reporter: thanks a lot. it's a very sad day in this country, as you mentioned at the top. the president said in his remarks that when he goes out to las vegas, he's going to meet with first responders and, in addition to that, families of the victims that were impacted by this. what's the message to each of those groups when he goes out there? sarah: i think it's very simple to say that his goal is simply to be there, to show the support of people from around the country and to stand united and not only this act of evil, but against all acts of evil and i think that was clear in the president's remarks today and something certainly that you'll see from his visit on wednesday. reporter: following up on the tweets about the -- [inaudible] -- the president tweeted, save your energy, rex, we'll do what has to be done. is it the stated position of the white house that you're trying to g

lee's land and why does he -- what is his plan and why does he make a stand? he is not exactly fighting with his back to the river. the body of water that lee is more focused on is in front of him. antietam creek. a barrier between himself and the union army. we've discovered, looked at, why he decided to stand and fight on september 16 and september 17. what is his plan? so often in the past it has been depicted that he would simply counter george mcclellan's blows, that as my fellow historian tom is eager to point out, george mcclellan and robert e. lee are two generals. they don't meet in the middle of the field and decide who will attack and defend. so often we think that robert e. lee is defending. but there is a bit more to that. i will jump off of what dan was talking about with confederate strategy and what chris talked about last night. there is an 1850 portrait of robert e. lee. he been in the army for three decades at the time this was painted. he was very much a student of military history and history in general. you can see the quote down here. "t

but the most off the police today we have seen does it the dems on the rise. i see. that i'm into a strong allies of death too i know if their ways that i see you we weep for are going to seem weighed on bio med school too and science you know but we've been to progress in the same way fighting system putting discrimination on don't. you see the tomorrow that's the cultists today some sex relationship is ben i like that by law you know them indians is watch food in their pajamas you know is cindy is is in doing these these becoming madea martyr fundamental challenge death despite eventing us to move then duffy hiv so sites that do not think that being a homosexual min being allowed to have been is a pass on that injecting drugs a migrant up but he was on there did because sickness that they cannot but he does if a democrat don't does not work then that is a show you know exclusion and they try. they come to get in of a negative way hiv you want your group and the head thousands of harming just that particular group but that a wider society as well because a i don't t

does that mean for risk -- what does that mean for risk? we are looking at the euro. we are down.t eurog streak on has been broken. the longest winning streak on the euro has been broken, and it is poised to end. if you go to the blog this morning, they say the markets are taking the risk in catalonia quite well. the euro is down, but it is not being flogged. the best case scenario for the market and spain is the scheduled government sanctioned and official succession vote. the dollar is stronger this morning on the tax plan and the overall trump trade reignited. there are a couple different facets at play. anna: there is a euro and dollar store. there are calls on the e.u. to act from catalonia. radarg up the risk underlining your story that there is a euro and dollar story. the tax story in the united states, yields are higher. potential for less dovish fed chair potentially. it is all talk at the moment. the asx 200 from australia is giving up -- giving us the stock story. the japanese market is open. the australian market is open. the australian market was replying to the chin

trump does, obviously.ended. >> he'll counterpunch on the policies. >> but he doesn't. see, you just said he would counterpunch on the policies, and he doesn't. he counterpunches with adhonin manchester united m attacks. trump started that. mccain has continued. you can argue, we can argue all day about where mccain is on the republican spectrum and he has done some things that republicans don't like. and that's fine from a policy perspective. but john mccain is a hero, right? and john mccain served his country in a way that donald trump could never. the level of self-sacrifice that john mccain gave to this country is something that make donald trump look very small when he attacks john mccain personally. because he'll never measure up. and i think he realizes that, so he tries to fight back against a man who is an american hero, who is self-sacrificed in ways that donald trump could never. >> i can just repeat it again. mccain stands up on the floor of the senate, bad-mouths half of the country and the par

what does that mean?is going to tell us how we can exercise that freedom? applause the thing that is important, and there is a lot of things that have exacerbated the divisions between the parties, we are not going to agree on everything but we must have the respect for each other and understand we all come from different backgrounds and have different backgrounds and have different experiences. i expect you to have as much appreciation and respect for my background as you —— asi respect for my background as you —— as i have the yours, there does not mean that the hate and rhetoric we are seeing in washington, it is exacerbated by the president. pastor, divisions exacerbated. this started far before donald trump, let's be clear. this country was set up let's be clear. this country was set up to be divided the moment that black people was forced to come to this country, way before donald trump ever set foot as president of the united states. as long as there is republicans and democrats there is republican

jonathan: does that hurt valuation? chris: it does.flation trade. that is difficult for technology especially if the 10-year goes about two point 5%. you expect financials to do better and you would expect some funding from the tech space. about eight minutes into the session. up to tenths of 1% on the doubt. 5% on the s&p 500. -- up to 10 of 1% on the doubt. from new york, this is bloomberg. ♪ taylor: this is "bloomberg daybreak." "what'd yoomorrow on u miss," paul krugman. this is bloomberg. ♪ the annual nobel awardeds prize has been to richard thaler of the university of chicago. he was awarded for his understanding of how humans make economic decisions. for more on his accomplishments, we are joined by a colleague of dr. thaler's. randy, thank you for joining us. give us a sense of what richard thaler's effect will likely be on economics? >> it has already happened. he has really helped to transform the way many economists think about economic behavior. he really wants to try to introduce humanity into the way people think about hu

does any member wish to change his vote? how am i recorded? >> you're not recorded. >> i vote no. >> there are ten yeas and 17 nos. >> the nos have prevailed on voice voig voice vote. >> mr. smith, mr. king. >> no. >> mr. king votes no. mr. roger the. mr. romers votes no. mr. duncan votes no. mr. perry. mr. perry votes no. mr. katko. mr. katko vote ts no. ms. mcsally. ms. mcsally votes no. mr. gallagher, mr. gallagher votes no. mr. higgins. mr. higgins votes no. mr. rutford. mr. rut ford votes no. mr. thompson. mr. thompson votes no. mr. m ms. jackson-lee? mr. langevin. mr. langevin notes no. mr. richmond, mr. keating. mr. keating votes no. mr. payne. mr. praayne votes no. ms. watson-coleman, ms. watson coleman votes no. mr. corps rhea votes no. ms. barragan. mr. smith? ms. jackson lee. >> how am i recorded? >> the gentle lady is not recorded. >> no. >> the gentle lady votes no. ms. barragan. >> have all members voted? does any member wish to record or change his or her vote? how am i recorded? >> the chair is not voted. >> i vote no. >> on th

does she need to, any democrats who took money need to?for everyone -- look, this is beyond politics, right. republicans, democrats, this behavior should be condemned widely condemned but especially individuals who accepted money from him, who say they are friends with him, and also pretend to be leaders for female equality and for young women. it does beg for comment. hillary clinton yesterday was tweeting about children's books. so, you know, she could tweet. she doesn't have to make a speech and nobody has to make a big deal out of it, but it does call for leadership and a condemning of the behavior. look, we on the right, you know, roger ailes, bill o'reilly, these are names on the right that the political spectrum of the right that also behaved incredibly badly, accused power -- abused power, put women in terrible positions for many, many years and conservatives were quite slow to distance themselves or condemn that behavior. i have been heartened that many democrats have said they're giving back their money immediately. >> yeah. >> b

good olives so lost on helen of how does a good long mind in. this. forum. i know that i may be better than i am getting to know nothing are not enough and i want to feel the benefit of them but i didn't think it'd be. better to. look at it. and i'd be standing behind me from enough to the welcome view what if she didn't hide and almost. had to limit the times give you know what that's how about in a slack set on how this can be done i could do it but i could have but he walk out of mine a little before i don't. know how and then the thought about that off that i'm in the. us not to feed. him a bit of nothing. the hunton must be at. least some of the one hundred a month. go until. their you. have the amount of cum the. supply of them it was a pill for nothing. but how was it something. like that. something that a hand. used to stay out. of the of. the productivity and jihadi danny i know not from whom but at the mouth that she jammed on to also been a member of member feedback the fall of the. faith on that if women had the issue because i thought of men whe

does he see a distinction there? >> we see a problem with any stories that are inaccurate or untruthful being presented to the mesh peopamerican people as. >> also speaking about the fraying relationship about the relationship between tillerson and trump. >> is he upset his secretary of state didn't deny calling him a moron in his public remarks yesterday? >> as the secretary of state said, this is a petty, ridiculous accusation. and, frankly, i think it's beneath the secretary of state to weigh in on every rumor out there. his spokesperson, however, did come out and clarified that the secretary of state has never used those words. >> what's your response to those who say the president has undercut the secretary of state. >> i think the premise of that question is absolutely ridiculous. the president can't undercut his own cabinet. the president is the leader of the cabinet. he sets the tone, the agenda. i think that question makes no sense because of that. >> as though the stakes weren't high nufr, peter baker summi

does he get -- does he have any misgivings on the way it occurred or the impact on the nation? sec. sanders: that i'm aware of. >> i was wondering why did the president involved himself in the uranium one investigation? are you trying to gin up your own russian investigation to rival won a cap he'll, and where is the evidence of hillary clinton colluded with the russians as he tweeted this morning? sec. sanders: the president has push for transparency, if that is what you are referring to when dealing with congress. that is something new for a president to push for transparency, and that is what he has done. that was the purpose of what he was trying to do in the process. the president made a charge that hillary clinton -- sec. sanders: i have addressed that thoroughly. >> so you are saying -- you sec. sanders: i am saying i am calling on your colleague. leader the majority attacking steve bannon --i am wondering if the white house has an opinion on that. is mr. bannon fair game, is he viewed as helpful to the president's cause, and has the president had any success offing him out o

that in the new york to you know when what does it mean. when you. talk. to. people that i do not even know but enough. to see that. i had to get. hide. a lot of these. come up. to how do you look ma the punch that even though seems to be a big lead had to keep this up over. the koofi twenty one dollars half in a moment this will not will. suddenly came up here that. we can issue a ticket and that is the whole thought of way because he is back at me now and then i can hear the metal welcome. him. i don't. have that bad mood grow this economy not disappoint him but that is going. to get ahead was the bigger. ha ha ha. ha. because simply assume. if it has a little it's a little bit you found no way. to hit the emotion if you have a love if you gave me. to. tell them that and then move to one hundred of those a couple in the movie that you loved him about ten of the last of the was how lucky i knew him but young a shot of my day that there's a bloke one kid has obviously got to stop but not. below listening. to him can you behave well economically and they did th

kelly does and sanders does and the administration does. that is it from me. aboutcould you talk more frederica wilson for viewers who don't know her? can you talk about your experience with her? caller: she is a community minded responsive congresswoman. mentioned thate they hadn't heard of her but folks in the district have heard of her and she is responsible and good and does what she all the to do. she does stuff you expect your representative to do. i am an independent and i can vote for folks in primaries and florida but i would vote for her in the general and i will again, especially behind all of this. and i encourage more folks to get involved. host: thank you for the call. the arlene super of a, what do you want to pick up on? guest: the caller mentioned the opioid epidemic and he would the to see reporters hold president speak to the fire on the issue. and there has been some follow-up since he said was going to be a national security issue and he was going to declare one. the new york times pointed out that it had been so many weeks since he had sa

does president trump agree? does he agree with the assessment of what? reporter: that bigotry seems emboldened and our politics seem more emboldened to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication. those were president bush's words. ms. sanders: i think if everybody is pushing fabricated things, most people would think that is coming from the news media and i would agree with that sentiment. reporter: the president signed an executive order today that appears to allow the pentagon to recall retired pentagon officers into duty. what is the reason for this executive order? ms. sanders: i don't have anything further on that, and i will have to get back to you. hasrter: general kelly become a political conversation. >> we believe the last few minutes of today's white house briefing to go to the heritage foundation for a panel on freedom of speech, what does it mean? oflysts will debate if vincent van names should be allowed to receive the federal trademark as one example. introduction are being made. you are watching live coverage on c-span. >> hosting our d

does the president support that? >> secretary sanders: i am not sure what we would push back against and they have shown more and more that there was no connection between the trump campaign in collusion with russia. >> reporter: two questions. first, the president is quoted last year as calling mr. papadopoulos "a great guy." today it was "a liar." i wonder to clear the air, how well did he actually know him and was he briefed by him and often connected he had frequent meetings? >> secretary sanders: the only interaction was the one meeting that the advisory council gather together in a large group of other people in the room, and to my knowledge, that was the only interaction they ever had. again, this is a campaign volunteer. he was not somebody that was a senior advisor. as a one builds him to be. he was somebody that played a minimal role, if at all, it was part a volunteer advisory board. that is the only instance i am aware of. >> reporter: the only other thing i want to ask him a few weeks ago when the presid

does the president believe he has won the argument as to what he said if players should stand?. >> it is a step in the right direction as we have said many times before the president supports saluting the flag and honoring those men and women in uniform. >> with a matter of principle that isn't adequate as president bush and president obama? and to send a letter to general kelly?. >> en el think there is anything but of president can do for the families of those that are killed in action. the point he was making is is is a different process. sometimes they engaged directly those comments were taken out of context and that is where it should be focused. >> and to say there is no question in my mind if we don't get it done you will see a reversal of a significant amount to be a major correction. how concerned is the president at this point of that possibility?. >> that we will get tax cuts done that is what we are focused on. >> one question per day. >> with the california wildfires situation does he have any plans to visit california to survey the damage?. >> not at all. the admi

>> that's correct. >> is the question what does the defendant implicitly concede. >> the defendant does not implicitly concede that my conviction it's not marred by double jeopardy for example. but you could understand the plea to implicitly concede i am guilty of the offense for which i am charged. that would include facts and law as set out in the case we were discussing. if that's a proper understanding of blackledge, where does your case stand? >> the defendant is saying i'm guilty of the defense is charged. but, the constitution precludes my conviction because of the double jeopardy clause and because of here the second amendment to process clause. that is the category. so, it's on the face of the record the court had the formulation and gross that no power could impose a sentence. so with things not curable. >> no power only because it was not expressed that way. >> it's just how this plea agreement is properly a -- were talking about a forfeiture rule. here they concede that the plea agreement does not explicitly waived the defendant's right to appeal his conviction the only ques

what does that say? what message does that give to people around the world? >> it frightens people around the world. it is music to the ears of many of his most ardent supporters. it seems to scratch an itch he has. the good news for most of your viewers, it does not generate new dangerous policies. we have in most respects, other than the climate change paris treaty, we have exactly the same policy that barack obama was pursuing. jane: when people want to listen to someone from the administration, should they listen to >> tillerson or the president? >> for the moment, tillerson, but watch that spot. jane: thank you. with iran a nuclear -- and north k aea, there is no blackolac discussion of nuclear weapons. paul adams reports. >> money spent on what people really need. timeter: this is the first the nobel community has awarded a group campaigning against nuclear weapons. for an organization that has only been around for 10 years with a relatively low profile, it is a big boost. >> i can. >> you can. abolish nuclear weapons. >> we have decided to award the no

the data does not show that. this is a tax bill that needs to be rejected because it is so unfair and inequitable to the american people. this is much worse than the health care repeal because its ramifications in leading the cutting medicare and social security will be far-reaching. there will not be a family in marker that goes untouched. reject this budget and tax bill. the speaker pro tempore: gentleman from georgia is recognized. mr. woodall: i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. woodall: to agree with some what my friend had to say. there will be no family that goes untouched. if you like to go to the council of economic advisors webpage, mr. speaker, you can see their most recent report which suggests on average $4,000 in additional wages for every wage earner in this country. every family in this country. making a difference for economic growth. we know that economic growth matters. more jobs means more pressure on labor. higher wages means mo

why does he the unknown so many why does he get involved in the new ship how does he let its would be symbol of these unfocused you know and also having been you may not remember me but when i was young i was a congressman i led the way on this insulting people i did it i got a lot of attention it's the easy way to get people to say almost and i attack tip o'neill and. in the long run it doesn't work because you anger people you build up enemies chris christie did it new jersey started out very popular attack oh it's a breath of fresh air by the end of his governorship he's the least popular elected official in this country and that's the road the trump is on a you know what are you insulting mitch mcconnell who gave you neil course of why we insulting him right why we insulting bob corker who you vetted for secretary of state why are you why insult anybody did reagan insult anybody larry he won out any made people like him and i don't really go bomber and never well you know that's the that's one of trump's strengths right he's the counter puncher right. the reason that he goes back

what does that mean? awe of the women who used me to share their stories and that as i'm sure for you my entire feed and i was so proud of them for coming forward and sick of having to -- sick of having to tell my story and sick of women having to tell their stories to be believed. it's actually pretty ludicrous we call men's violence against women a women's issue. and actually it speaks volumes to who we hold accountable and responsible to stop that violence. it affects the resources that go into the issue. there's a department of justice study shows only 8% of the resources that go to rape prevention are going to men. that is not going to help solve this problem. if we do not hold men accountable for what they're doing and if men do not hold themselves accountable as well. >> so what do you see happening next? because clearly you know, things do change in terms of social mores. maybe more women will feel that can stand up and step up. it doesn't necessarily change the fact if you're a young 22-year-old

how does that now play in? >> the sex stereotyping says that if you are a man attracted to men or a woman attracted to women, either way, you do not meet the stereotype that the employer has for how your gender should behave. in that case, you are being put into question, do i keep my job or do i have my choice of partner? >> but is it putting a disadvantage on one sex, either men or women, or is it putting a disadvantage on homosexuals? and if that is now the distinction, it is not men and women, it is homosexuals versus heterosexuals. >> it is putting a distinction on an individual basis because f sex. and when an individual is discriminated against because of sex, regardless of other people that might fit in that group, looking at the individual, that is discrimination. > is it sex discrimination, in your view, if an employer fires an employee for cohabiting out of wedlock? >> yes, your honor. >> that would make this a very broad doctrine, wouldn't it? >> for cohabiting out of wedlock -- the text was not a f

movements i mean how does it deal with this. well it isn't a buy and it's in a bind because of course they will come across elsewhere in europe particularly eastern europe i should say and the national question is one they are very scared of what other independent movements are rising on the inspiration of cats catalunya and of course you have leaders like emanuel mccraw of friends who is a centrist in the french state is highly centralized doesn't want any of these centrifugal forces the developing so yes it is caught in the same time there are voices the prime minister of brussels the slovaks and so on who are criticizing spain and i think that's likely to open up one strength or a whole has got i have to say as he has got the support of the spanish socialist party and as a consequence of that of the socialist grouping in the european parliament but that's up for a front the catalans we're looking at in order to try and crack and insisting to people in the sense and the european center left how can you support a government sen

what does that tell us about the growth story?.m., we are counting down to the start of the session. investors selling on developments in the u.s. policy.a meeting on bank of england expecting -- expected to be raising rates on thursday. what about the new fed had? what about the china pmi numbers? it does indicate a softer tone for the chinese economy. rishaad: u.s. stocks falling overnight. follow the loser in asia. the political intrigues, the probe by robert mueller into potential russian interference. it is seen as a distraction. let's take a look at how hong kong markets have opened. pmi off of a five-year high, equity investors are reading that negatively. extending losses. chinese bonds, they seem to be enjoying the data. the 30 yield -- 30 year yield falling three basis points. energy shares waiting the advance when it comes to the breakdown. discretionary stocks dragging on the hang seng. with financials as the biggest drag, we will show you the reasons why. bank of china, new china life also dropping. let's take a look

does president trump agree? what does he see as his role addressing that? ms. sanders: does he agree with the assessment of what? reporter: that bigotry seems emboldened and our politics seem more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication. those were former president bush's words. ms. sanders: i think if everybody is pushing fabricated things, most people would think that is coming from the news media and i would agree with that sentiment. -- >> reporter: the president signed an executive order today that appears to allow the pentagon to recall retired pentagon officers into duty. what is the reason for this executive order? ms. sanders: i don't have anything further on that, and i will have to get back to you. reporter: general kelly has is upset this has become a political conversation. the president's call with the widow. why did he feel like it was appropriate to come here calling unlikeempty barrel, calling her privately? why did president trump feel the need to take that further? >> i think it is simple. ones talkingthe about the story, a

and he does it with dr. scholl's. only dr.assaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. we're on a mission to show drip coffee drinkers, it's time to wake up to keurig. wakey! wakey! rise and shine! oh my gosh! how are you? well watch this. i pop that in there. press brew. that's it. so rich. i love it. that's why you should be a keurig man! full-bodied. are you sure you're describing the coffee and not me? thisto a hilarioushing baudiobook on audible.g and this woman is laughing because she's pretending her boss's terrible story is funny. still actually laughing. no longer making a human noise. experience the comedy, not your commute. dial star-star-audible on your smartphone to start listening today. so we created the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort, your sleep number setting. you can even see how well you're sleeping and make adjustments. does your bed do that? the most amazing part is they start at $699. that's $200 off our queen

lost on helen of how does a good long. in. this. kind of i make it better that i'm going to know nothing are not enough and i want to give it another bit of time but i didn't think it'd be. better to. do it. and i'd be standing behind me from enough to the welcome view what is she going to hide and almost. i'm. just the job you had to model it meant that i'd give you what those have that in a slack set off all this can be done i could do it but i could have but he walk out of my a lot before i don't. know how and then the thought about that off that i'm in the. us not to feed. him a bit of nothing. allowed me. to hunt them up. at . least some of the have been long. going to live there you. have been a lot of come the. plate image was a pill for nothing. but how was it something. like that. some seen that a handout. was to stay out. of the bad news of. the productivity and jihadi danny you know not from whom but at the mouth that she does have been a member of member feedback the fall of the. faith on that if we wind up the issue bec

and where does a lawyer go? there are 14 pages where every single possible crime is categorized as in or out based upon decades of judicial and other interpretations. that's how one knows. >> in a crime of moral turpitude we don't have to consider what the ordinary case is, do we? >> not the ordinary case, that's for sure. >> all we do is look to the elements that everybody has to make? >> correct, correct. let me close with this. i appreciate the instinct to try and see if this court can do better with section 16-b than it did with acca's residual clause. but in deciding whether to take that route, this court has to decide whether anything is to be gained by this whole enterprise of sending the lower courts back to apply now a different standard and figure out how it applies to all of these crimes. that process is going to be no less arbitrary and speculative, and lifetime banishment should not hang on the unpredictable answer to the question, is this crime in or is it out. congress can of course decide the cir

johnson on one level does that.also too kee o advertising onsen -- too kneeeen advertising himself. francine: are you involved with brexit? you are looking a possible trade deals> not officially. official: not in an capacity. i am cochairman of the british-turkish forum. turkey is a very important trading partner with the u.k. really important. turkey is not a member of the european union, but is a member of the customs union. so, they are very concerned, the turks are, that we end up with similar arrangements. we don't have trade between turkey and the u.k. disrupted. francine: i know you have to get on the panel, but given the diplomatic spat between the u.s. and turkey over the last several days, should that change the relationship the u.k. has with turkey? mr. straw: no. i mean, look, there seems to me in the trump era, we can't gain anything from previous history. this is new territory. mp, they'rer. tru going to be also as of difficulties with its allies as well as with its adversaries. so, we have to work the

>> he does. as he said yesterday -- or two days ago, as i said yesterday, nothing has changed despite what you may read in the media or watch on tv. i would certainly trust the president and my comments far above those other reporters. >> and i want to ask you, the president -- words matter. the president can move markets. he can cause miscalculation when it comes to adversaries. in the context of the questions asked of you today, when you've been asked what he meant by "calm before the storm," you've mentioned north korea. you've mentioned iran. there's the implication that there is some kind of military action. there was some sort of forecasting there. can you clarify if we are interpreting things correctly? >> i haven't been specific about anything. i've always talked about the fact that we're continuing to put maximum economic and diplomatic pressure on countries like north korea. i'm simply saying that all options are on the table as they have been, and we're not going to announce what actio

one used at this time and how does it. and this was different not whether someone telling someone it's very. true i think it's how you approach an official that is a certain way of doing it you can just. go in fly out. he said i'll be in doha with the top stories from al-jazeera at least eighty five people confirmed after two bomb attacks in the somali capital mogadishu on saturday the first.

why does it swirl? world because something goes from a bigger cavity to a smaller one, and discovers how the heart valve works. people thought it worked because of pressure. he said he is because of the swirl. anyone who can see patterns of nature like that and combine it with curiosity and observation, i loved it. charlie: you begin to look at him -- let's talk about his early childhood and go forward. what we know about his parents? walter isaacson: he was very fortunate. his father was a notary. had he not been born illegitimate, he would have been [indiscernible] we know he would have been a very bad notary. like let perfect be the enemy of the good most of the time. it meant he could not have gone to the university to get a formal education, so he became a disciple of experience. somebody would tell him something like why the sky is blue, and he would do a water vapor thing to test it out. we see the beginnings of the scientific method because in this little town da vinci, he was born out of wedloc

and i can also have a really negative impact, in that it does keep these things secret, it does allow the harasser to potentially harass other people, other women in the workplace. but i think that is more difficult because, if you are experiencing harassment, the best, the best sort of resolution is a resolution that doesn't go to court. nobody was to go to court. it is expensive. it takes a lot of time. it is incredibly invasive. you are going to be cross the attorneys are a talk about how you were a bad employee, you don't want to do that. up withtter to come some resolution that doesn't require that, and the question is, whether it would be harder for victims of harassment to get some sort of restitution if it is unlawful for the employer to require confidentiality as a condition of the settlement agreement. i'm not sure what the answer is but it think it's a difficult question that we really need to wrestle with as we think about public policy in this area. host: denise in ingleside, illinois. caller: yes, i want to talk a little bit about an experience i had just a year ago with

where does this leave her? ina thought. where does this leave her? in a difficult position.ion is even more precarious than i was after the general election because it was, as you say, a very bad result for the party. they saw the majority all but wiped out. the prime minister struggled on, many thought that would be the end of her but she survived it and went into the party conference needing a boost, needing to reclaim the political initiative with policies, ideas and to reassert authority over the party and to say to the wider public and to mps and the party in general, i have your support, we will continue. u nfortu nately support, we will continue. unfortunately that did not happen because the speech, through no fault of our own, was a bit of a disaster, the cough, the letters, the prankster, all the rest. we were not talking about our policies afterwards, we were talking about that perception, which counts for a lot in politics. somehow one of her asa lot in politics. somehow one of her as a weak leader running out of time. this plot has failed for now, fizzled out, as

what does that have to say to you about his planning and what does it tell you about it?two things he wanted the note to be found. he is very meticulous in the planning, and to carry that down to recording the exact distances between him and the ground, between him and the targets, i think it really is very telling about how detailed he was. >> fran, at the end of last year, dhs and fbi did a threat assessment and they talked about shooters and they talk about the fact they were soft target it is ability to hit civilians and one thing they listed in the catalog here was the ability tgnifict ch weapons that do not require special access or training. >> they mentioned the shooting in san bernadino and orlando. >> how much is this a part of a security problem? >> this is a tremendous problem and the 0 problem dianne feinstein is talking about, it does not go far enough, you need to prohibit the sale and us. >> we are not talk act tbt single greatest factor that is in reality, which is these high capacity ammunition magazines. that is what allows you to fire many bullets befo

does the president want these talks to continue or does he want the measures that the united states is proposing to end the talks? >> the president wants to continue the conversation. the president ultimate goal is to make sure we get the best deal for americans as possible. for american workers. he's been clear that he doesn't think the current structure is a good one and he wants a better deal. we're going to keep moving forward and see how these conversations go. that's where we are in the process. >> will you know about that tomorrow? >> i'm not going to get ahead of the conversations but we'll have a readout. >> how do you think these on going fights with republicans on capitol hill help the president's agenda? tax reform first and foremost. >> the president's very committed to getting tax reform done. he's calling on congress to get their job done. they're on another vacation right now. i think that we would all be a lot better off if the senate would stop taking vacation and start staying here until we actually get some real things accomplished. the president's here and is commi

that's what the amendment does. distributional effects of the proposal on income categories done by the congressional budget office and the joint committee on taxation. thank you. senator enzi: others speaking in favor? i urge my colleagues to support this amendment. t would require c.b.o. and j.c.t. to aconsider. major legislation is defined in the resolution of having greater than a quarter of a percentage on g.d.p. and requires them to report the macroeconomic effects on major legislation. i have some concern with the analysis which will make it more difficult for c.b.o. and j.c.t. to allocate dynamic effects across income categories. this amendment passes the requirement that is quote to the extent practicable. so i won't oppose it. this is the first major legislation moved into the budget, big six framework included that it should not shift the burden. so this information is helpful to members when reviewing the final bill. senator stabenow: given senator i would like nts, to rename my amendments. senator enzi: