it makes it a national security issue. speaking with experts that we have done over the last couple of years. there are vulnerabilities in our system. and there is opportunities to close those. but there is a threat out there and they're still vulnerabilities that we need to address. with that in mind in january of this year. secretary johnson as he was they are an asset. they are an essential system. they enable our democracy to work. something that we need to as a country need to collectively take seriously to protect there is a national security challenge to our election. recognizing that. we put renewed attention and even more attention on taking steps to secure that election. in support of very clearly of the state and local officials who have the responsibility for administrating those elections. over the last nine to ten months that the department of homeland security has been very deliberate in taking activities to strengthen our resources. put them in support of enhancing state and local government officials as th

tools into security operations. one of the tools we know to be effective is canine detection teams, particularly in detect and protecting against explosive threats. in a may, 2017 hearing before the committee on homeland security last year, the director of the threat assessment division within the transportation security administration attested to the of aviation screening canine teams, saying canines are incredibly effective, that can do things we can't even measure with machines. the legislation before us today, h.r. 4577, would require t.s.a. to establish a of workin group of stakeholders to determine ways to develop a domestic canine breeding network to deduce explosive detection canines and modernize canine training standards. today the demand for train and certified dogs is huge with more and more stakeholders coming to understand the capability of our four legged friends. this demand has led a shortage presenting challenges for the u.s. government in the procurement of suitable canines. in testimony before th

they will fill security posts, roeving security and ambassador positions.ity staff will participate in training and exercise programs simulating real world day-to-day operations and also train to respond in exceptional circumstances such as natural disasters or human caused events. on opening day, the transit center allied will provide unarmed security guard staff including stationary patrols. they'll also have the supervisory management staff in place. in addition, the security operations staff will monitor and manage the security center's enacted at the hub for security transactions. i'll be an active part of the security team, which is composed of staff already mentioned. the tjp security staff will work cooperatively with the tjp asset manager staff and those managing the transit center, retail tenants, the department of emergency management, personnel from sfpd southern station and other federal state and local first responders. tjpa staff completed a multistep competitive procurement process to select a qualified security guard contractor. on july 5,

i mean, we started off with steny saying, we want security also. everybody wants security. and then we can go to comprehensive later on. and maybe that is a longer subject and a bigger subject, and i think we can get that done, too, but we'll get it done at a later date. go ahead. >> mr. president, i'm senator hirono from hawaii. all the immigrants serving in the military right now, i would like nothing better than to have comprehensive reform. what i'm hearing now is a commitment to resolving the daca situation because there is a sense of urgency. you have put it out there that you want $18 billion for a wall or else there will be no daca. is that still your position? >> yes. i'm telling you, somebody says $22 billion. this is like the aircraft carrier. started off at $1.5 billion and now at $18 billion. no, we can do it for less. we can do a great job, a great wall, but you need the wall. and i'm now getting involved. i like to build under budget, okay. i like to go under budget, ahead of schedule. there's no reason for seven years also. i heard the other day, please don'

millionical 2017, 15.6 my social security users access their sosa security statements nearly 46 million times. we mailed around 13.5 million statements. in addition to basic benefit information company statement includes information on how work affects benefits, how a workers claiming decision affects survivor benefits, how to avoid medicare late enrollment in all these, and information on average life expectancy. another viable research is our website. each month, nearly 15 million people visit us online to get the information they need to make informed decisions about their benefits. the website includes a retirement estimator which is a powerful and popular and accurate tool. it uses an individual's actual earnings information from our records and allows him or her to input a few pieces of information to receive an estimate of benefits. it returns benefit estimates aged 62 at the retirement age, an age 70, or any agent between . our retirement estimator is one of governments highest rated websites. we recognize that not everyone chooses to use the internet. our committed employees as

they want security. struck byhave been your use of the phrase "wall system" and just want to explore with you a little bit what you mean by that. one of the people i have taken advice from is the rio grande , whoy border manny padilla has told me that in his vast experience in the border patrol, it is composed of three elements . infrastructure is important. you can call it a secure fence as we did in 2006, or a wall. it includes not only that infrastructure, but technology and of course the border patrol agents to be able to respond, sensors when they go off or radar and the like. is that what you mean when you talk about a wall system? some configuration of those components -- infrastructure, technology, and personnel? sec. nielsen: yes, sir. the president asked us to look at operational control of the border. the wall system is infrastructure as you described, and it is also closing those loopholes that we can promptly remove those we interject. missionat four main sets -- impedance and denial, partly

advisor for homeland security. we have others there who are struggling hard to perform that function. do you think, at this point, the way we have aligned that department of homeland security and the department of the defense and the department of justice in this space is maximizing what we can do? >> no, look, the department, coming back to what i started with is if you have a departmen department, so many different missions and responsibilities and authorities, if everything's a priority, nothings a priority. in fairness, i think they've done a pretty strainer job

elections in the face of a national security challenge and a national homeland security challenge. this is something that, you know, we've talked about a lot collectively over the last couple years. but let me take you backwards for a second. clearly, what we saw in the department of homeland security in the spring of 2016, what we saw working with the u.s. intelligence community, the fbi, other folks involved in national security, that there was an elevated threat to our election system. in 2016 we weren't perhaps fully aware of where the elevated threat was coming from, what else was going on. but we certainly saw during that period there was an elevated threat to our election system. during the run-up to the 2016 elections we, working with others including the intelligence community and the fbi, worked really hard to get out as much information as we could. that's really when the partnership with the u.s. election assistance commission started, where we started working regularly with the secretaries of state to get out as much as we could to understand what was going on in the e

homeland security. obviously there are certain times where although there are national security concerns about foreign born individuals in the united states. a federal prosecution for one reason or another is not the super bowl way to go about dealing with the threat posed by that individual so the immigration authorities have other tools at their disposal, one of them being the removal tool which is cited by ice in the section 11 report. it is the case that the threats to our national security are not showing any signs of relenting in fiscal year 2017 alone dhs encountered 2554 individuals on terrorist watch lists, formerly known as the fbi's terrorist screening database. those individuals were, of course, attempting to get into the united states. additional importance statistics provided by dhs and documented in the report include the fact that between october 1st, 2011, and september 30th, 2017, a total of 355,345 noncitizen offenders were administratively arrested after previously being convicted of

and security forces college. thank you for being here. next ambassador of counsellor in charge of international security affairs at algae ya ministry of foreign affairs. a security and counter terrorism advisor to the algeria foreign minister. a career in algeria security. and served previously as ambassador counsellor. to the africa union and the arab league. served as ambassador in switzerland, portugal and -- finally to my left. ambassador who is the delegate general of morocco penitentiary and reintegration. during his tenure as the head of the penitentiary system. he has instituted widespread reform throughout the prison system. he has had a distinguished career in public service and served in numerous positions including chief of staff. to the ministry of interior. and served as ambassador to norway and finland. he started off his career as a university professor in the english department of university. and i have it on very solid sources that you are an excellent teacher. so gentlemen, thank you to all of

security from criminal groups?ause security at the end of the day is more crucially independent on good cooperation with mexico. today mexico turns many , undocumented central americans, often unfortunate people who try to come to the united states, then what is turned at the u.s.-mexico border. if mexico drops this cooperation that was very hard to achieve and took long time, many more people would be tempting to -- be attempting to cross into the united states. similarly, security against drug trafficking groups, criminal groups very much depends on the united states finally being able to build up good cooperation, intelligence sharing, ability to mount joint coordinated actions and also crucially the capacity of the united states law enforcement institutions to work with their colleagues in mexico to help reduce the corruption and increase efficiency of those law enforcement institutions in mexico. all of that would be lost if the administration resorts to very hostile relations, very hostile environment with me

>> the president wants border security. >> okay. and -- >> just to be clear. >> what does border security entail, does it include the wall at this stage or could the wall wait until later? >> the wall is one of the pieces as well as technology. and another, a number of other things that have been laid out by the department of homeland security. i believe that secretary nielsen sfoek about that pretty extensively at the meeting today. in that portion, it was covered by you all. >> the wall has to be part of a deal in order for the dreamers to have protection? >> border protection has to be part of the process. >> there's a difference -- >> why we want to secure our border, i do, the safety and security of this country are the president's number one responsibility. and his number one priority when it comes to anything that he does. absolutely. >> i understand how the wall can be different from border security -- >> no i sgloent it could mean agents, more fencing, doesn't necessarily mean a physical wall. >> that's part of the negotiat

they did not pay social security taxes and received no social security retirement credit for their time in office, but effective in 1984, they had to begin paying into social security. but get a richard in north carolina independent. -- let's go to richard in north carolina, independent. caller: i've to questions please don't cut me off. is do you know or could you tell me how many members of congress are millionaires? meber 2 -- could you tell of the how many members elector college -- electoral college are members of the african-american community? guest: those are pretty tricky. i can't speak to the electoral college question. on the wealth of members of congress, it is a fact that members of congress tend to be significantly more wealthy than your average u.s. citizen. a lot of these lawmakers had built up personal fortune before they were elected to the congress whether through their own businesses. a lot of times they marry and to wealth. rollcall does a great list of the most wealthy members of congress. and their personal net worth can go to the hundreds of millions of dollars.

security council on the current situation in iran. after more than two years of silence north korea and south korea are ready to reopen direct lines of communication choose days face to face talks will focus initially on the north's participation in next month's winter olympics in the south bout officials in seoul say discussions are expected to move on so what they describe is of a areas of common interest for as many as this report in a few days the truce village of panmunjom on the demilitarized zone that separates north and south korea will be a hive of activity representatives from the two countries will hold high level talks here for the first time in more than two years earlier this week north korean leader kim jong il dialogue and his new year's day address four days later his government agreed to hold talks the announcement came just hours after the u.s. and south korea agreed to postpone and your military drills for the end of february these have long been regarded as provocative by pyongyang. the two leaders agreed not to c

first, border security. it takes my bill that passed that provides $30 billion to support -- secure the ports and borders through technology and boots on the ground and physical barriers like the wall. it ends chain migration. and the visa lottery program, which is a random system that brings in people not based on merit but on a random lottery system that needs to change. we just need to look at what happened in new york city on halloween where the vehicle struck so many people and then last december with the suicide bomber attempt, both of whom came in through these respective immigration policies. policies that need to be reformed to protect americans. finally, codifying daca that congress has the authority to do under the constitution. that we do it in a constitutional way. and as the president has mandated, we think it is a very fair and generous package when it comes to immigrants. finally, this is a historic opportunity for the american people. believe,ese issues, i the american people fully support.

of the security council. discussing the domestic atuation of the council is practice that is not in line with the councils responsibilities as outlined in the u.n. charter. doing so does not help that does not help so the domestic issue in iran. think you. i now yield the floor to the representative from the russian federation. president, i would like to congratulate you on taking up your post. congratulate you on the night, but the american delegation left me with no option but to thank you today. there are many members of the council who i am happy to see in this room, and with whom i hope to work. i also want to say goodbye to those who have stepped down from the council. mr. president, today we are witnessing once again how the united states is abusing the platform of the security council. ay is the united states, permanent member of the security council, undermining the authority of the council as the main body which is responsible for maintaining peace and security? i think it is obvious for everyone th

host: social security -- what's the status of social security? what should be done about it? guest: one of the main drivers of social security long-term -- social security is not facing an immediate crisis, but it's rising income inequality. the more and more earnings that are concentrating among the wealthiest, which are above the payroll tax cap, the less income is coming to the system. andebruary 16 this year, millionaire will have completely pay their payroll taxes for the year. onyou are to lift the cap the payroll tax side of things coming would solve enormous part of the social security shortfall. host: do you agree? guest: i don't think that's a particular good idea in the sense that if you pay into the system, the question is do you get a return on it? to hang benefits more more to people -- pay benefits more to people that are middle-class of billionaires? -- middle-class and billionaires? these can be very moderated changes in social security at the time. they just passed and the tax bill indexing of the tax brackets for a new measure of inflation that is probably

it could be virtual or border security sochlt security. so i think the wall is a little bit of a rorschach test for him and his base. the big problem for his base is amnesty. because they consider even for kids who came here through no fault of their own, the daca kids, they don't care. they say this is amnesty. and that is the key. that is why you heard john cornyn and lindsey graham saying you have to be the one to close this deal. he is the only person getting the republicans on the ballot in 2018 political cover with the republican base because of the way he campaigned and how much support he has, still has, with the base. and he's got some goodwill. >> what the president wanted to show today, honestly this was his reality show today, and everybody decided they were going to pl going to play and be a part of it. as long as cameras were there they would tell them what they were thinking. and what we heard from the president multiple times i'll be signing it. whatever you br i to me, i have a lot of confidence of the people in the room.

peace and security. when the rights of the people are denied the people rightly resist. if the concerns are not acknowledged, then peace and security are inevitably threatened. the case of syria provides a recent and horrible testament to this fact. and what is happening in the towns and cities across iran right now bears out this fundamental truth. the content of the regime for the rights of its people has been widely documented for many years. the people of iran have finally had enough. and they are showing it by taking to the streets. the iranian people understand the nature of their regime. they understand the lack of voice and their government has allowed the regime to ignore them. and it has allowed the regime to spread conflict and instability far and wide. if you listen to the slogans they chant in the street, this understanding comes through loud and clear. the united nation reports the iranian regime spends at least $6 billion every year propping up the murderous assad regime in syria. the peop

and the security -- the overall security ballot, in particular the security voting systems, voting systems versus overall election systems has been front and center. that's been the discussion at the local level and national level we've been having for quite some time. what i think is new is that conversation is broad to include all of things that we do in our office as it relates to information technology and election systems more broadly. and i think that's the -- that's the bigger challenge. i think it's easier if you look at one or two things like ballot security, like voting systems technology. it's a little more difficult when you have to deal with the human element like human firewall training and all the different things we as local election administrators and i think at the state level as well, you want to try provide services to the voters. you want to try provide that new technology to make your office accessible. but the more you do that, the more you expose yourself to some of these security threats. so i think that's been the biggest shift between the 2016 election and what w

he wants border security. that means the wall, but it also means that there are elements of because how the country has developed along the border that a wall would not be appropriate. the border has to be secure. when you want to say, how many miles, that is part of the negotiation. that is what we will work towards. how many of you were in the room at the time? he was very clear. >> can there be a daca deal without money for the wall? >> i do not see -- and the president was clear about this -- the wall is part of it. one thing i will tell you is, we do not want to be back here to years from now. we want to solve this -- we do not want to be back here two years from now. we want to solve this. [indiscernible] >> alex a czar was asked about rising prescription drug prices at his confirmation hearing earlier. that is next on c-span. the media isat how covering the russia investigation. the defense department is undergoing a full-scale audit which began last month. committee gets an update. it live coverage beg

the chairman of homeland security, to be a national security issue, as well. and with that, i yield to mr. labrador. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the purpose of our legislation is pretty simple. it helps president trump keep his promises to the american people to fix our broken immigration system. and let's be clear. this was a very significant promise. the president would never have been elected without making that promise to the american people. so now it's time for congress to deliver on this promise. the bill we're proposing is strong. but it's also a fair bill. it's strong, because it gets serious about enforcing our immigration laws, making it tougher for people to enter our country illegally, and stay here. our bill strengthens enforcement through a series of common sense, conservative reforms that the american people overwhelmingly support. these include authorizing funding for the border wall, stronger interior enforcement, mandatory e-verify, strong chain migration, and ending the visa lottery. in return for these strong measures, we are ready to prov

and to do their best to use sure the security of the olympics. next week's discussions will center on north korea's participation in the upcoming winter olympics as well as generally improving into korea relations but officials here in south korea are also hoping the negotiations will eventually lead to north korea returning to international talks on its nuclear program even so president cautiously optimistic saying we should refrain from making premature judgement or expectation. the japanese defense minister also sounded a lot of caution when. north korea goes through phases of apparent dialogue and provocations but either way north korea is continuing its nuclear and missile development we have no intention of weakening our warning and surveillance. it is new year's day speech said north korea with its nuclear weapons program and even called for the mass production of deployment of nuclear warheads and this house. from the conservative perspective in north korea trying to buy time the majority seems to believe the north korea is trying to fina

i mean we started off with steady saying want security also. everybody wants security. then we can go to comprehensive later on and maybe that is a longer sub and a bigger subject. i think we can get that done, too but we will get it done at a later date. >> then a short time ago senator jeff flake said this happened after the cameras left the meeting. >> after the cameras left there were more things the president expressed more flexibility than some expected. he put a little better definition on what the wall is, and more importantly, what it isn't. saying we are not talking about a 2,000 mile wall. there are rivers. there are mountains that make it unnecessary in certain places. that's what a lot of us have been saying for a long time. by the way, most of it is a fence, not a wall. and also the willingness to say all right there are four items we need to deal with. forget rest. put it off. noter to get the rest but put the rest off. >> can you walk me through the four. >> the four are daca, the protection for the kids, the second would be a border element, which we al

one to stand up for the principal of physical security but do so consistent with our national security values. that's the essence of what the standing committee in law and national security is all about. that's also why i'm so pleased that our speakers are two people who spent their entire careers doing just that, standing up for it physical security of the united states but doing so in a manner consistent with our values. our discussions are harvey and fran townsend. i was trying to figure out if i would go through their bios but then i realized they held collectively together every single job at the department of justice in the fbi going back to 1910. in harvey's case. in fran's not quite as long. so instead what i thought i would do is let them introduce themselves. but i want to tell you one thing about each. first, about harvey and you know i'm going to have a hard time livi limiting myself with harvey. he's an intellectual. he's an idea person. but i think about teddy roosevelt, not hunting or doing all those -- not that aspect of it. but i'm thinking about the man in the arena.

economic security and national security go hand in hand. see what's happening with this president. his leadership, his bold actions along with that of the republicans in congress, that massive tax cut for the middle class. they are making this country more prosperous. consumer confidence, unemployment levels down for african-americans for teens, for hispanics, for women, for all of america, all of the confidence measures up. national security economic security go hand in hand. the wall is not negotiable. the democrats came there today basically saying daca is not negotiable. give us a clean daca bill the president said no. daca considered the wall. also an end to chain migration which accounts for 9.3 million resettled in the population a year. one person comes here and you get about seven family members. some countries send upwards of 20 family members. it has to stop. >> sean: when i showed the tape of chuck schumer and bernie sanders and hillary clinton and then there is barack obama. >> yeah. >> sean: all these democrats, they basically

and securing the elections process. just as a way of the background this topic is obviously the top of jews your coming out of the 2016 election where we saw a nation state state level election systems through registration as well as vendors and spear phishing attempt in 2016 as well as the declaration of election with critical infrastructure by the department of homeland security, so on this panel today i hope we delve into some of those issues and talk about the operating environment election officials are in today sharing expertise see all have experiences and most important what steps we are taking to secure the process when you board in 2018 and how you are moving forward prepping for primary season and november, so i want to note jeremy gray who is also to be a palace from la county came down with the flu and so we thank him for not coming and sharing, but his expertise will be missed and i know he's greatly disappointed and you all will have to carry that extra load of not having jeremy there. i will start out wi

>> the committee on homeland security subcommittee on maritime security and order that the subcommittees meeting to examine the challenges the united states border patrol agents and u.s. customs and border protection officers facing carrying out their mission to secure nation's borders. before beginning to discover the moment of silence for rohingya martinez killed in the line of duty last year and van horn, texas. agents and officers of u.s. customs and border protection work every single day to secure our nation often in rugged terrain sometimes in very remote areas far away from the entities of modern life are the exposed the blistering heat of the arizona desert in the brutal cold places like montana. working at the port of entry than the women of cpb are the driving force the kind are for security operations. the nation is fortunate. the agents willing to take significant risk on every single shift to ensure that cartel do not smuggle drugs and dangerous individuals across the border. it's dangerous work made more dangerous because agents are subject to frequent assaults. some of th

they want security. and so, i have been struck by your use of the phrase wall system and just want to explore with you a little bit what you mean by that. one of the people that i have taken advice from is rio grande padillo, der is manny who has told me in his vast experience with border patrol, it is composed of three elements. he said infrastructure is important. call it a secure fence as we did in 2006 or all call it a wall but includes not only that infrastructure but also technology and of course the border patrol agents to be able go espond sensers when they off, radar and the like. is that what you mean when you say a wall system, sore combination, infrastructure, technology and personnel? secretary nielsen: yes. he president has looked at operational control. technology and personnel and also closing those loopholes and remove those. but we look at four main mission sets, impedens and denial and we look at the domain awareness, cameras and access and mobility, so the border patrol agents can res

but i think in many ways cyber security and a need to focus on just not just the physical security of your election system but the digital and cyber security of your elections is something moving from the other duties of the job description to an actual line item or paragraph or full section of your job description going forward and that's one of those things that i know everyone in the field is committed to doing and wants to make sure they do right. the problem is in many ways we're catching up to the bad guys or the advanced good guys in the field and learning how to do that. there are some very high level things i know were already in place and we're going to hear about those today but there are other things each of us and the people we work with are going to have to do a better jub of, thinking about how skurly we back up our information and how we secure it. knowing how to spot, respond or not to fishing attempts and other attempts to get at the data that we work with on a daily basis. one thing that i want to point out that i don't think gets a lot of attention in cyber securit

security, homeland security and giving a tremendous amount of money that results in often a waste ofnow, he campaigned and won on the pledge to build a wall and have mexico pay for it. obviously, things didn't go well. he didn't invite the mexican president over to the white house and then things went downhill from there. and then he kind of laid back from that -- from that pledge, but he brought it up again this week. he again said, oh, by the way, mexico will pay for it somehow. why-- if we all know that realistically mexico is not going to pay for the wall, why do you think he keeps bringing that up in his rhetoric? >> well, obviously, he believes that is a way to persuade congress and taxpayers to layout those extraordinary expenses for the wall, that somehow it will come back in the future. it will not come back from mexico in the future. the president has previously spoke been ceasing remittancesies that go to mexico that's nearly legally or forensically-- cannot be done even if they sort money from undocumented workers. but, also, even if somehow you could go through the enorm

it is a net exporter of security. for example, in close cooperation with us, they have trained counter forces in chad while lent powerful support to strengthen the support to terrorism. egypt remains an important strategic partner. it's most pressing internal security challenge is the isis affiliate in northern sinai. let me pause to reiterate the u.s. condolences for the horrifying mosque attack that killed over 300 egyptians. also targeted christians appalling church bombings antiques on pilgrims. other terrorist groups have claimed on officials and police outside the sinai. for cairo, instability there represent critical threats to egyptian security. we remain committed to supporting egypt's efforts to defeat terrorist threats. building on decades of strong security ties, we are seeing growing counter terrorism cooperation and continuing strong military efforts across a range of programs. turning briefly to economic stability, president assisi has taken bold steps on reform and economy is improving albeit slowly. f

thinking about how securely we backup our information and where we secure it. knowing how to spot, respond or not respond to phishing attempts or other attempts to get the data that we work with on a daily basis. one thing that i want to point out that i don't think gets a lot of attention in the area of cyber security, i think a lot of the focus in the country right now on cyber security is on the impact that the security of the election system can have on the integrity of the outcome, we want to make sure that the people who won the election are the right people and we didn't somehow corrupt that result through intrusions into the election system. that is incredibly important. i want to suggest that in many ways election security as well something even more important and that's the security of individual voters. all of us are sources of tremendous amounts of personally identifiable data which are linked to things that we care a lot about, our life savings, our homes, our bank accounts, details of her personal life that we don't necessarily want shared with th

national security. all of these policy shifts and announcements have happened and are happening at a time when we as a nation are coming to terms with las vegas, what happened in manhattan, southerland springs, texas. these are just some to name a few. this is all happening against the backdrop of a president who uses the power of his digital footprint to bully communities, including american muslim communities almost daily. today, like i mentioned earlier, president trump is going to be announcing his national security strategy. from what we know, his strategy will focus on four areas. defending the homeland, america prosperity, advancing american influence through peace and strength. one passage of the draft strategy reads "the united states rejects bigotry, a persian, and seeks a future built on our values as one american people, and activity and concerned american citizenry is a fundamental requirement for a free and resilient nation. for generations our society has protected free press, free speech

border security. real robust border security is a puzzle and has many pieces. one piece of this puzzle is the need for technical and technological infrastructure. drones, radar, everything in between, but another piece and i believe you will agree another important piece, is the legal authority to apprehend, detain, and remove people who illegally after our country. -- enter our country. unfortunately our current legal authorities are riddled with loopholes and don't allow us to effectively do that. just ask any cbp officer about how effective our current authorities are. the answer you will hear is pretty clear. they aren't very effective. that is why border security provisions in any daca deal without changes is useless. border security isn't enough. we also have to make changes to our interior enforcement to allow us to remove dangerous criminal aliens. your department needs increased authority to remove human traffickers, sex offenders, criminal gang members, drunk drivers, and terrorists. public

security from criminal groups.urity at the end of the day is far more dependent on good cooperation with mexico. mexico turns more undocumented central americans unfortunate people who come to the united states then what is turned the u.s. on a mexico border. it is hard to achieve and long time many people will be attempting to cross into the united states. similarly, corporation, securities against drug trafficking groups, criminal groups, very much depends on the united states finally being able to build up good cooperation, intelligence sharing, ability to mount joint coordinated actions and the capacity of the united states. law enforcement institutions to work with the colleagues in mexico to help reduce the corruption. all of that will be lost if the administration resorts to host style relations and environment with mexico. building up this cooperation took decades, it was difficult and there was some cold moments in the u.s./mexico relations and people worked hard to improve that wrop ration. that could eas

everybody voted for the secure act in 2006.the number of people that contact us saying we do not want to build a wall. he and i knew each other for years as a pastor and we started talking about the immigration issue. and in that dialogue he said to me. regardless of their legal status but then he said in government we understand that there's a different responsibility. the church engages with every person equally to the government has the responsibility of being able to look at the law, what is legal and what is taugh not in g abide by the law. there is an issue of humanity. the programs that are caught in between the gap have no country because they were brought as infants or young children with a pair and violated the law were a child but came in now sometimes 20 years. to pull the politics out of there and say border security as a whole isn't a controversial issue,. i would say is the united states senator have the privilege occasionally goingng to do interviews. let me give an example cnn has a great studio here in washing

the united nations security council needs to address issues which are related to the national security and peace but the rain in recent case doesn't seem to be the subject of the issue and i was surfing the net today and i saw an interesting point was the united states president has two to two thousand nine hundred. seventy and only four of those who have been on human rights and all of those for human rights have been only on the you're wrong on and i think this indicates how selective the you are. president and the united nations the united states administration have been addressing the human rights issue and their point is that why americans are not war. protests are taking place in other countries including the western countries and cities including europeans as well which recently rekha see some of them why they were not happy when the saudis repressing and killing and the rest think shias in the east and saudi arabia why they are not worried about thousands of yemeni you know sent people and civilians being killed the bomb being set by the saudi arabia and its cold i just want to

this is a question of what is important to our national security, to be secure. again, let me take it to other subject because they do these things as a distraction. it's totally irresponsible. it isn't one person in the intelligence community recognizing the sacrifice that our men and women in the intelligence community make for our country's security that would say, this is not reckless. >> christopher wray, the director of the fbi obviously, recently selected by president trump, he got the memo. he could have come out and said, this is reckless. don't release it. >> let me just say this with all due respect. you really don't know what you're talking about right now. >> but did christopher wray look at it or no? >> i can't say whether he did or not, but he did not -- in order to redact, you have to have the people who know -- >> i'm not saying redact. i'm saying if these concerns are so sharp and obvious -- >> they've already said not to release it. they already said not to -- the justice departmentlready said it would be reckless to release it. you said that e