i think the story was dead at "the new york times" after the second time they killed it in december 2004. reason to say the only they reopened it, the discussion, was because i told them it was going to be in my book. -- they started this all series of new negotiations with the government. that was throughout the fall of 2005. and a whole series of meetings. and i was getting very anxious because i knew my book is coming out in january 2006, and they kept having these whole series of meetings that went on forever. culminating in that meeting with bush and. or. after that meeting between them, the white house still wanted people.meet with more and i was, at that point, very concerned that they were not going to make up their mind fast enough. admiteemed not to want to that they were facing a deadline. then, fortunately, eric lichtblau, my colleague on the story, came in with new information right at the end where he was told by very good source that the bush administration had considered getting a court-ordered injunction against "the new york times" to stop the publication of the story.

was it the film never got to new york in time? they had to fedex it -- not fedex -- fax it back to new york. why -- why did it not get there in time? why was it not in the paper? >> and this is -- so this is your opportunity, darcy, as contributing photo editor with the "times," the hindsight being 20/20, they didn't run it then, but i'm running it now. >> i feel so much for the photographers. i said in the book, in the acknowledgements, it's like this book is really for them. they did all of this work and sophso few of the amazing images were shown not just in this category but category across the boards. this is a tribute to the great work they did. >> i do think this idea now that is kind of in terms of image is text as well, that's another way of reading into and sort of diving deeper into the ways in which we understand things. it seems like text was king. it was all about the text. >> text is king. >> versus this kind of relation -- relationship between the way in which someone can understand a story and sort of the complexit

"the new york times" has also learned that four days before mr. comey was fired one of mr. session's aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about mr. comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the fbi director. the attorney general wanted one negative article a day in the news media about mr. comey according to a person with knowledge of the meeting. before firing mr. comey, the president spent a weekend working on a letter the president intended to send to mr. comey, the letter was never sent. the special prosecutor has obtained a copy of that letter. "the tikts" reporting tonight that the first sentence of that letter said that the russia investigation had been, quote, fabricated and politically motivated. after the president fired james comey, "the new york times" reported that the president had asked james comey to shut down the fbi investigation of michael flynn in the day after "the times" reported that deputy attorney general rod rosenstein acting in the plac

was it the film never got back to new york in time? they had to process the film and send it -- fedex -- fax trying to say fax, fax it back to new york. why did it not get there in time? why was it not in the paper? >> this is your opportunity, darcy as contributing photo editor for the "times" to sort of re-edit and -- >> absolutely. >> with the hindsight being 20/20, you have the opportunity to say, you know what, they didn't run it then but i'm running it now. >> i'm running it now. i feel so much for the photographers. i said in the book, in the acknowledgements, this book is really for them. they did all of this work and so few of these amazing images were shown. not just in this category, but in categories across the board. and this is truly a tribute to the great work that tames did. >> and i do think this idea now that is kind of -- image is text as well, that's another way of reading into and diving deeper into the ways in which we understand things. it seems text was king. it was all about the text versus this kind of relation

"the post," the film -- >> not "the new york times." >> no no. it's about "the washington post." e you green with envy? do you think it should be "the times" given that it's ago the pentagon papers and "the times" printed them first? >> i am. my first reaction was outrage. partly because -- >> outrage? >> well, look, then i'm going to turn around and say why that was an immature reaction. katherine graham made a courageous decision. "the washington post" is a remarkable institution. it was then, it is now. but the first really courageous decision was made by arthur sals burger in publishing them and in letting the reporters spend three months verifying them. his was the most courageous decision. i think i got my back up especially when the producers reached out to me and wanted to talk about how -- how this film was going to portray the new york times. >> which to be fair it did and gave -- >> i haven't seen -- >> you haven't seen it? >> no. in fact, i've been quoted i'm not going to see it, but andy rosenthal, a friend, who's abe's son, i was railing to andy one day and as he oft

"the new york times" hea

a couple years prior, the former "new york times" picture editor, john morris, who was 95 years old, came to visit the times. i had the opportunity to sit with him for an hour. i asked john, is there anything in the archives i should be going back to look for? john immediately grew agitated and said go back and re-edit everything. he said they didn't let us run the right pictures. they had to edit for space constraints for the print newspaper. they had to edit for the style of the times of the day a , stiffer picture, somebody clearly looking at the camera. john knew what was left behind. the idea stuck with me. so, when dana approached and said is there something in there, i said yes, there is something in there. rachel, dana, damien, and i started with a list of names. who could we name that the times might have covered? we started with martin luther king, rosa parks, all the familiar names you would expect us to start with. but what happened was the discovery beyond that, the accidental finds, the names we never in a million years expected, the ordinary people. that is really what

government forty eight hours prior to publication the new york times pushed for four days wiki leaks objected the motion to use the new york times betraying the entire day by day thematically publication plan to secretary clinton spokesman p.j. crowley not asking questions. now media outlets are already using the word luzhin to describe the cooperation between the u.s. state department and this new york times journalist if one looks over the words and the reporting done by scott shane in november four out of ten of his articles were about the issue of allegations of trumped russia collusion however there seems to be quite a record of collusion here between hillary clinton and the press if one looks over the fact that glenn thrush a reporter for politico is actually sending his articles to the clinton campaign for approval before they were published has been hired by the new york times and so there seems to be quite a bit of collusion going on between hillary clinton and the press there's ample evidence of that extensive evidence in the wiki leaks predestiny e-mails talking back and f

remarkable reporting from "the new york times."uch more to get to, believe it or not, stay with us. shawn evans: it's 6 am. 40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston, 1,200 workers are starting their day building on over a hundred years of heritage, craftsmanship and innovation. today we're bringing you america's number one shave at lower prices every day. putting money back in the pockets of millions of americans. as one of those workers, i'm proud to bring you gillette quality for less, because nobody can beat the men and women of gillette. gillette - the best a man can get. >>> the trump white house developed this pattern we have come to recognize easily at this point. it's fun to watch for whenever s somebody gets in trouble. whenever a former administration or campaign officials gets in really hot water, suddenly, they have never heard of that guy. mike flynn, a campaign volunteer. campaign chairman paul manafort, he worked on the campaign for a short period of time, foreign policy ad

of newuary, 2016, a team york times staffers discovered dozens of photographs in the new york times archives. the month-long series explore the history behind the photos, garnering 1.7 million views and thousands of comments. we are thrilled to welcome tonight two of the authors who were involved in creating the unpublished black history from the new york times archives. is a contributing photo editor at the new york times and the creator and editor of a times blog. rachel swarns is an author who writes about race and race relations. she is the author of american tapestry, the story of the black, white, and multiracial ancestors of michelle obama. moderating the conversation this evening is the curator of film and photography at the museum of african american history and culture. she also serves as the head of the african-american media arts center. welcomingn me in darcy eveleigh and rachel swarns. [applause] >> i would like to echo lawrence wonderful comments. i think we are in for a delightful conversation. i am so thrilled to be here with both of these two dynamic women. i would like to

the "new york times" will not be the failing "new york times," but the failed "new york times," so they'll have to let me win, and they'll be loving me, because they're going to be saying, please, please, don't leave, president trump. what is wrong with him? >> it's the old adage, there's no such news as bad news, no publicity except bad publicity. i think what he fails to understand is people are not tuning in because they're necessarily admiring of him. they're tuning in for the train wreck aspect of him. >> i often think, what is wrong with him? want to go alphabetical or what? >> doesn't this show get old after a while? >> the trump show, i just assumed he was joking about it. >> no, he's not joking about it. >> he gave rise to the return of investigative journalism, so thank you, mr. president. >> the reason we have 3.5 million subscribers is because people want the truth. they don't want the trump fog machine. >> what's interesting about both those examples that you gave from that incredible, another incredible interview of his is that they both reflect the same kind of set of mind a

firing now, president trump is firing back at "the new york times" calling the ordering of robert mueller as fake news. this is the biggest non-story ever being hyped by the liberal media that we all know hates president trump. the reason the brain-dead partisan press is breathlessly spreading the fake news in their echo chamber is because they want to create a distraction. they do not want you, the american people, to know with the biggest story in their life times that involve real evidence of wrongdoings and crimes they have missed. it's been a huge week of revelations about corruptions at the highest levels of the fbi and doj and tonight we have even more. new text messages. we'll share with you from the trump-bashing fbi lovers, peter strzok and lisa page and it will prove we've been on the right page. and fox news found the memo detailing major fisa abuses against the trump campaign, that will be released likely next week and tonight a stunning report hillary clinton protected a senior adviser on her 2008 campaign accused of sexually harassing a young staffer. a lot to get to. we st

the corruption here -- if you're a "new york times" writer is unprecedented. you should be covering a real story. when you put it together here's what it all means. you have hillary clinton, we now know fixed the primary against bernie sanders or i'll use donna brazile's word, put the fix in, that allowed clinton stay in the presidential race and they want her to beat donald trump so they overlook the crimes with the incontrovertible evidence and they try to influence the election with a bought and paid for phony russian dossier full of salacious lies and propaganda. the obama administration took the dossier and weaponized the tools of intelligence and invest and targeted members of the trump campaign and later the incoming president if this isn't watergate on steroids and every person isn't prosecuted to every extent of the law we have shredded our constitution. have you powerful officials in the fbi and doj, clearly trying to circumvent what is the whistle you, the american people. they did not want donald trump to become president. we can never let this hap

also in wiki leaks accuses the new york times are breaking the terms of an agreement on diplomatic revelations that alleges the polluted with hillary clinton . migrant german m.p. is under investigation after a twitter post this blamed for inciting muslim. second eight pm here in moscow this choose the evening welcome to r.t. international you know neal our top story this hour now is iran enters the sixth consecutive day of unrest twenty one people are now thought to have died in clashes in the country on monday night nine people were killed during an attack on a police station this is footage from the incident iranian media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days alone there have repeatedly reportedly been more than four hundred and fifty arrests across the country on choose the around supreme leader spoke up for the first time since the unrest on he accused foreign powers of for mentoring the trouble. the enemy is waiting for an opportunity for a crack it can infiltrate if you look at the recent days incidents. who are at odds with these

"new york times". fake story. >> we've been telling you a long time it doesn't matter to the liberal mainstream media. it is why the "new york times" posted this story before this show, the media went into a frenzy, they completely lost it. it is sad because journalism is dead. watch this. >> the president of the united states ride to fire the independent counsel, robert muller tmull -- mueller? is that impeachable. >> you wonder if he's corrupt? we lean toward corrupt. >> his first year in office, he's done everything to undermine and obstruct and halt this legitimate investigation. >> it adds to the mounting evidence there's a -- there's a serious obstruction case here. >> i don't know how this movie ends but there was a lot of bloodshed in the godfather. this is going to be a rough year. >> it is so predictable from the news media. they never waste an opportunity to smear the president and pedal fake news. they don't care about the truth. that's sad. their goal is to damage and destroy trump. you cou

i'm next time a president goes after the new publisher of "the new york times" with an attack on the urces. with a replacement you can trust. all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ so we sent that sample i doff to ancestry. i was from ethnically. my ancestry dna results are that i am 26% nigerian. i am just trying to learn as much as i can about my culture. i put the gele on my head and i looked into the mirror and i was trying not to cry. because it's a hat, but it's like the most important hat i've ever owned. discover the story only your dna can tell. order your kit now at ancestrydna.com. howard: ag sulzberger took over as publisher of "the new york times" for his father. he told readers in an open letter misinformation is rising interest in the media is declining. as technology platforms elevate rumor and propaganda over real journalism and politicians jockeying for advantage while inflaming

with unix accuses the new york times of giving u.s. officials advanced damage control time over diplomatic revelations and alleges the media giant colluded with hillary clinton. and an anti immigrant german m.p. is under investigation after a twitter post of hers is blamed for inciting anti muslim hatred. are broadcasting live direct from our studios in moscow this is our trash launch on thomas glad to have you with us now as iran sees its sixth consecutive day of unrest at least twenty one people are now thought to have died in clashes in the country on monday night nine people were killed during an attack on a police station this is footage from that incident iranian media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days alone and there have reportedly been more than four hundred fifty arrests across the country we've been asking people in tehran what they think about the protests and the encouragement coming from. giving there i feel that if people's economic problems were addressed thes

the new york times all over that story. let's have a look at another perspective on that in the us media. fox news focused on donald trumer, who fired back at the remarks made by bannon by calling him "an opportunist" who brought "backstabbing, harassing and lying" to the white house. 0 nto onto other stories here in the uk. the metro calls storm eleanor — the deadly winter storm that's been whipping across most of northern europe — "one el of a storm". two people were killed in spain while a skier died in the french alps. the guardian front page leads with windsor council leader's demands that police use law to clear the area of homeless people ahead of the royal wedding of prince harry and meghan markle. the financial times pages look at the rise of green car sales and how norway has become the first country in the world where more than half of all new cars sold are hybrid or electric. and, finally, the gulf news has some bad news for people with a sweet tooth — it warns chocolate could be extinct by 2050 due to climate c

michael schmidt, reporter for "the new york times," i know you're in incredible demand tonight because of this piece. thank you for spending time with us. >> thanks for having me. >> if there is a lawyer in the white house counsel's office who right now is reported to have deliberately misled the president in order to hopefully maneuver him out of doing something he legally could do because that lawyer thought it would imperil the presidency for the president to take that action, how does that stand? and if you're a lawyer, are you allowed to do that? are you allowed to mislead your client and are you more or less allowed to do it if your client is the president of the united states and you work in the white house counsel's office? hold that thought. if you've been diagnosed with cancer, searching for answers may feel overwhelming. so start your search with our teams of specialists at cancer treatment centers of america. the evolution of cancer care is here. learn more at cancercenter.com/experts you know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let'

there's a "new york times" report out this morning. it, again, brings the the likeness to this case for potential obstruction of justice in the russia investigation that goes all the way up to the president. the "times" reports that president trump ordered a white house lawyer to stop jeff sessions from rhee accusing himself in the russia probe. the "times" said he is aware of the president's unsuccessful attempt to lobby jeff sessions, and there may even be written notes from reince priebus about this. >>> meanwhile, a new excerpt from michael wolff's bombshell book reveals the president's involvement in crafting a misleading statement about a meeting between russia and members of the trump team, including jared kushner, his son-in-law and don jr., his son. the president portrayed as erratic, easily distracted, uninterested and unsure about the basics of his job is. the white house says it is is complete fantasy. what we are expecting to hear from the author himself later this hour. we will have it all covered. let's start with cnn's j

wiki leaks claims the new york times for breaking its terms of collaboration regarding diplomatic revelations and alleges the outlet has colluded with hillary clinton got live come upon. an answer migrants german m.p. is under investigation after a twitter post is blamed for inciting anti muslim hatred. this is r.t. welcome to this latest live thirty minute news round up from moscow with me kevin our first six on iran we focus so that country entering its six consecutive day of unrest twenty one people are now thought to have died in the clashes so far in that country on monday night nine people were killed six during the attack on a police station in fact there are pictures you're seeing now on your screens already of media reporting that the protesters there were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days alone there reportedly been more than four hundred fifty arrests across the country on choose day around supreme leader spoke out for the first time since the unrest started he accused foreign powers of fermenting trouble in his country. towards the enemy is waiting for a

wiki leaks accuses the new york times of giving u.s. officials advance damage control time over diplomatic revelations and alleges they colluded with hillary clinton. migron german m.p.'s an investigation after a twitter post is blamed for inciting muslims. live from moscow every hour of the day this is r.t. international my name's you know neil welcome to the program. enters the sixth consecutive day of on wrist twenty one people are now thought to have died in clashes in the country on monday night nine people were killed six during an attack on a police station this is footage from but it's really a media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days alone there have reportedly been more than four hundred fifty arrests across the car on tuesday iran's supreme leader spoke out for the first time since the rest because here. is foreign powers are for mentoring the tribal. point is a new order so the enemy is waiting for an opportunity for a crack it can infiltrate if you look at the rece

we're following it all with our reporters and analysts and samantha, according to the "new york timesport and you're an expert, the attorney general jeff sessions was actually searching for negative information or dirt on the fbi director at the time, james comey, president trump also ordered the white house counsel to lobby sessions not to recuse himself from the investigation. president supposedly wanted protection from the attorney general. how damaging is this to the trump presidency. >> i think it's damaging to the presidency but more importantly it's damaging to our national security. we have to remember that the russians have for decades waged active measures to diminish the credibility of our democracy and our institutions, including the separation of powers. that's nothing new. what's new is that every time we have a thread about president trump trying to interfere in the investigation or den great the fbi, the president is now doing something that helps russian intelligence services in their mission to diminish confidence in our democracy. >> very serious point you're making

wiki leaks accuses the new york times of giving u.s. officials and found to sit down much control of time over diplomatic revelations alleges the media giant colluded with the retention. of. the migrant german m.p. is under investigation after a twitter post of hers is blamed for inciting on to a muslim a brit. you're cheating in from right around the world this hour welcome to moscow and to our to international my names you know neal good to have your company. sees its sixth consecutive day of unrest twenty one people are not thought to have died in clashes in the country on monday night nine people were killed six during an attack on a police station this is footage from incident iranian media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days and there have reportedly been more than four hundred fifty arrests across that you've been asking people in tehran what they think about the protests on the encouragement coming from the protests. but this is not giving that i feel that if people's ec

trump is not the only one to question yet another "new york times" anonymously source, entirely anonymousew mccarthy writing in the national review because the times story russian collusion two-point oh. he says that back in april they had a similar blockbuster story of collusion but blamed it on another trump campaign staffer mccarter page. he wrote, mccarthy dead, "back then no fewer than six of the reporters worked their anonymous current and former law enforcement intelligent officials in order to generate the blockbuster. trump in his argument with "the new york times" may be scoring some points, at least among people who approve of his behavior in this regard. if only in the sense that the most common sense dictates that people will say something anonymously that they will not say on the record. this battle with "the new york times" and other members of the mainstream media is not likely to end until mr. mueller and the special prosecutor's office comes down with an indictment on the president of the united states or if it clears the president of the united states. back to you. >> s

sessions aide, according to the new york times report. i'm sorry, but the spokesperson at the justice department who's denying it has been caught denying things that have been proven true in the past. >> mueller is looking at all of this, this has all been handed over to him, everything is a piece in the puzzle, as you well know, including the crafting of that first misleading statement aboard air force one, that's talked about in michael wolf's new book. the president's legal team thought that statement was an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation's gears, and it led one of mr. trump's spokes men to quit, because he believed it constituted obstruction of justice. how significant is that? >> extremely significant. if you were to look at those things as the tendency is -- look at it in isolation, you cannot do that, you have all of the context that's been provided to say, you have a pattern and a theme here that's emerging. the president of the united states, who is having a hand in either crafting or trying to someone a pa

that was clear in the "new york times" story last night.s when he crossed the line from not just complaining about bob mueller but kwhen he issued the order to fire him. under the statute, you don't have to be successful. you have to take an action where you intend to obstruct justice to be guilty of a crime. you mentioned the wiretaps in mafia cases, we don't have wiretaps in this case, but what bob mueller has is conversation after conversation that aides to donald trump can reproduce. he's taken the aides and braugtd them in for interviews. and to the extent he ever said if james comey doesn't stop this investigation, i'm going to fire him. and the likelihood that he talked to an aide like that, is intent. >> we're going to squeeze in a break here. adam chief, the ranking member of the intelligence committee will join us next. any object. any surface. if you've got a life you gotta swiffer i had severe fatigue, became diagnosed with hodgkin's lymphoma. he was a good candidate for immune therapy, which is allowing his immune system to att

this time, it's the new york

"the new york times" has learned according to this report four days before mr. comey was fired one of mr. sessions' aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about mr. comey. part of an apparent effort to undermine the fbi director. it's not clear whether mr. mueller's investigators knew about this incident. if you have aides to jeff sessions going to a congressional staffer and asking if they have anything damaging on the director of the fbi, what do you make of that piece of information? >> again, they're trying to stop and influence an investigation. that could potentially be obstruction of justice. again, it depends on exactly what was said and what they were intending to do. but also, i want people to understand that this whole thing of trying to remove individuals like comey or, for example, robert mueller, this doesn't stop the investigation. you have all these fbi agents, all these federal prosecutors. if they have evidence of criminal wrongdoing, the investigation just keeps on going. it may be with different people. y

what's "the new york times" worried about? something that didn't even happen. last time i checked this morning, bob mueller is still on the job. what the heck is the "new york times" got going? this is like a person sitting in the stands during the ncaa championship game and on the last play when alabama wins in overtime they miss the play because they are watching the guy selling hot dogs to see if he makes change right. that's just how ridiculous the times has become. >> sandra: not to mention if mueller is still on the job. he may be moving closer to an interview with the president himself, governor. the president reacted to this saying i would talk to mueller pending what his lawyers tell him to do, of course. i would talk to them. when asked would you do it under oath he said sure. is that a good move for the president? >> probably not. but i'm sure his attorneys will make sure there is a definite framework. the biggest way you can get in trouble with people like the f.b.i. or anyone is that they get you to answer questions multiple times hoping they get yo

i want to read from "the new york times." two days an aide to mr. sessions approached a capitol hill staff member asking if the staff member had any derogatory information about the fbi director. the attorney general wanted one negative article a day in the news media about mr. comey according to a person with knowledge of the meeting. now, we knew that the white house instructed rosenstein and others to find cause to fire comey, but going to dig up dirt so there's negative news stories day in and day out, your reaction. >> it's very scary we are even discussing that in this day and age. and when you look at it in the face of it, it speaks to the very depths of the depravity i think we're seeing from this white house. not have we seen anything like this. this is only the third day of the year. >> jason, i have to ask you what's interesting about this is this sounds a lot like the white house is doing to james comey today and has for several months. it sounds like a consistent strategy because they've been attacking his credibility since the moment t

according to "the new york times," "mr. mueller learned about the episode in recent months as his investigators interviewed current and senior former white house officials. before heading home from davos this morning, president trump disputed the report. >> mr. president, why did you fire robert mueller? why would you want to fire robert mueller? >> fake news, folks, fake news. typical "new york times" fake story. >> the report has been confirmed by nbc news, "the washington post," cnn, "the wall street journal," even fox news. it does raise troubling questions. is it obstruction or at least part of a pattern of obstruction to do what he did and where are republicans? hasn't the president crossed a line here? >> will trump try to do it again. if he was willing to before, why not now when it appears the investigation is sniffing close e er and closer to trump. then there's the question of honesty. if the reporting it true by multiple news organizations, president trump wasn't telling the truth, was he, when he said this last

that's according to the new york times and four sources. former white house communications director anthony scaramucci joins me now. he's in davos. last month you said the president is too smart to fire mueller. when you said that, did you know what he had been trying to do last june? >> i actually did know but it's ir relevant. he didn't fire mueller. i find it ironic that this information is coming out while he's in davos. i would love to get a look at steve bannon's phone records to see who he is talking to and how this information is out there. second thing, is president talks to everybody. this information apparently happened in june. why is it coming out right now like a big water balloon on the president when he is having a fantastic trip here in davos meeting with world leaders and about to give a fantastic speech about global prosperity and growth. >> anthony. anthony, please. >> let me finish. >> you did finish. >> i got up. >> i appreciate you staying up late. it can't be a red herring. it's a distraction for what is otherwise im

>>> shelby this "new york times" story, something else we didn't just talk about jumped out? >> another big bombshell, sessions asked a congressional aild for dirt on comey. alone, may raise eyebrows. together with everything we know, points stronger towards intent, which is something you need in order to prove obstruction of justice. >> we should make clear, the department of justice did deny that allegation, but that is something else we'll be talking about. shelby halladay, that's "hardball" for now. "all in" starts right now. >>> tonight on "all in." >> did steve bannon betray you, mr. president? >> shock waves. >> i don't talk to him, that's just a misnomer. >> as new questions of fitness for office swirl -- >> what's the president's reaction to the growing suggestion that he's mentally unfit to serve as president? >> and trump threatens to sue. >> will presidents go to court to stop the publication of this book? >> new details on how the writer got all that dirt. >> they thought that this was going to be a positive book for the president. >> new concerns about more whit

i think wikipedia is popular, new york times, the bbc comedies and probably popular. possible. we are coming to time in a few minutes. at the chamber and its effect on news. anna burke in a? i think when we talk about credible reporting, and that is what we tried to deliver, this is a way of providing the audience with the widest range of soy is possible. —— anna belkina. i think tribal list issues are important. —— tribalist. i wonder how president trump, by engaging in these words, how he is sort of rounding out and painting as pa rt sort of rounding out and painting as part is in the previously seen as objective organisations. —— partisan the. fake news, as imperfect a phrase that might be, to think we can combat it? will be with you as a long? i think we are all starting to see the issues with it. so not for long. jimmy wales? i think that fake news will be a sorted out by algorithms. —— will be sorted out by algorithms. —— will be sorted out by algorithms. liberty media, we have a lot to do with. it has been around for ages and will be around for longer. —— qualit

part two of my conversation with the editor of the "new york times," dean baquet. ♪ >> announcer: amanpourn pbs was made possible by the generous support of rosalynn p. walter. >>> good evening, everyone, and welcome to the program. i'm christiane amanpour in london with the global perspective. in the age of me too, women across the globe are rising up against the toxic aspects of masculinity. and most importantly, they are talking. but there's another half of the planet that isn't talking. the other victims of masculinity, men themselves. men, who it turns out, are also paying a terrible price for their silence. it is something that's argued by the renowned british contemporary artist and social commentator grayson perry. fresh off debuting his latest exhibition "making meaning" in the windsor gallery in florida, he joined me in our studio for the discussion we rarely have. grayson perry, welcome to the program. so you have a big new show that you are sending to america. or is it already there? "making meaning." >> yes, it's in a place called windsor near vero beach in florida, which is a

also in this news hour wiki leaks accuses the new york times of giving u.s. officials that vanstone damage control. over diplomatic revelations alleges the media giant colluded with the weak. migrant german is on the investigation after a twitter post of hers is blamed for inciting teen muslim. just a few moments into a brand new day here in moscow where january the third welcome to r.t. international not only our top story as iran sees its sixth consecutive day of unrest twenty one people are now thought to have died in clashes in the country on monday night nine people were killed six during an attack on a police station this is footage from incident a reaming in media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the south in the past three days alone there have reportedly been more than four hundred and fifty year rests across the come on tuesday around the supreme leader spoke out for the first time since the on the rest began you cues foreign powers of fermenting the truth. which is that the enemy is waiting for an opportunity for a cra

the new york times curiously makes this sound normal. even if it makes it sound like there's a man that's thought through something and made a decision. there are no decisions here. it's just blather. when does blather -- of course blather can become a decision. the comey firing, nobody expected the comey firing to happen and then it happened because he did it on his own. he just went rogue and suddenly it happened. i believe expects a and continues to expect mueller fired. how that happens is a kind of a three dimensional thing. every day he's firing mueller. >> it's making that case for his lawyers to try to make that presentation of the character. the prosecutors and people looking into this aren't going to believe that a president is just that nutty and flaky and constantly saying things that aren't real? >> i don't know if that's true. they ultimately, that will be the ultimate question. was there intent here or was this just daily stupidity really? >> the president seemed to confirm that by having that be the thing that made him ke

trump. >> brangham: thomas erdbrink of the "new york times."k you so much. >> thank you. >> brangham: we now turn to one of the president's favorite means of communication: twitter. and, how those messages are read around the world. the new year's tweet storm is the latest example of president trump using the medium to conduct foreign policy-- and this time, it runs the gamut. on saturday, he signaled support for anti-government protesters in iran, saying, "the entire world understands that the good people of iran want change." that provoked a rebuke from iranian president hassan rouhani: >> ( translated ): this guy in america who wants to sympathize with our people today has forgotten he had called iranian people "terrorists" a few months ago. >> brangham: on new year's day, the president took aim at pakistan, accusing it of harboring terrorists and threatening u.s. aid. he tweeted, "the united states has foolishly given pakistan more than $33 billion in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies and deceit." that inci

also ahead this hour teen use are wiki leaks accuses the new york times of giving u.s. officials damage control time over diplomatic revelations on the made to the media giant colluded with hillary clinton. migrant german m.p. is under investigation after a twitter post of hers is blamed for inciting muslim hatred. live from moscow to the world this is r t international my names you know neil hello and welcome to the program twenty one people are now thought to have died in clashes in iran after six consecutive days of unrest on monday night knowing people were killed six during an attack on a police station this is footage from the incident iranian media reported that the protesters were trying to steal weapons from the site in the last three days alone there have reportedly been more than four hundred fifty arrests in the capital of tehran the u.s. ambassador to the united nations has praised the demonstrators and called for an emergency security council meeting to discuss the uprising. it takes great bravery for the iranian people to use the power of their voice agai

he was asked to react to the "new york times" story.ll play it and talk about it on the other side. >> it's totally irrelevant because he actually didn't fire mueller. i find it very ironic this information is coming out while he's here in davos, while he's had great fanfare. you and me, i would love to get a look at somebody like steve bannon's phone records to see how he's talking to and how this information is out there. >> so interesting tripartite defense there. not a story because never happened, not say story because quashed good news from this trip and by the way, i'd look at steve bannon phone records. >> going to blame bannon. it was a trifecta, very quickly. just journalism should be happy that the mooch is back, i guess. the thing about this investigation that we're hearing is, again, sources who have been interviewed by mueller, presumably some of the people you had in that graphic is saying that those investigators have not just accounts of meetings and who said what and this and that but they have e-mails and documents th