pueden llevar en filadelfia lluvia helada mÁs al oeste y luego lanier que se extiende y a partir de ahÍ 3:00 " para gran parte de la zona y mÁs en norte de 2:00 a 4:00 mÁs el interior de 4:00 a 8:00. 33 para esta noche o 30 en la madrugada cayendo nieve en la zona, 42 la mÁxima, mezclado con lluvia y este es el panorama de los prÓximos tres dÍas. un miÉrcoles complicado y jueves y viernes frÍo pero la lluvia pueda regresar tan pronto como el sÁbado y domingo. hablamos con un vocero de la oficina de impuestos de sobre cuÁndo usted puede recibir su cheque de reembolso tras presentar su planilla de impuestos. julio: los contribuyentes elegibles para recibir dinero su declaraciÓn de impuestos de quÉ aÑo, a veces se preguntan cuÁnto tiempo tardará el ir en recibir eimpuesto. y el reembolso. vamos a ver en el segmento su dinero. >> al informarse y seguir las recomendaciones usted toma el camino que lo llevarÁ una variedad de beneficios anuales otorgados por el gobierno federal . hace sÓlo dÍas de su fecha inicial muchos contribuyentes optan por ser ellos mismos los que preparen sus impuestos

to her left is rod lanier is. he is the director of development. these two partners work together and collaborate at the deep basis of that work they do is an important thing called money. they both have to deal with that. more importantly, they deal with developing the relationships that can sustain and support the catholic mission. this means individual relationships. so rod, you are director of development. maybe you can define for us, what development means. >> at its core, development is about relationships, as you touched on. i like to define it as creating and deepening relationships between persons and a particular organization. fundraising is a little part of it. fundraising is a derivative. even that, i look at fundraising as giving people who have a relationship, the opportunity to invest in something that they care about deeply. >> that sounds great. how long have you been with the archdiocese? >> i have been with the archdiocese for about seven months. started in early june of 2017. >> i know you have been a great presence throughout t

lanier, do you think the supreme court today would have reached a similar conclusion or would they have recognized maryland's right? >> well, one of the things that mccullough v. maryland is such a landmark case, it puts certain questions beyond dispute. not for its time, but incredibly controversial decision for the entirety of chief justice marshall's tenure. but now after the civil war, it's quite set that the government has the power to do things like establish a bank to regulate the currency. the idea that the supreme court would, for example, say that the federal reserve or the great agencies of government are not constitutional exercises of congress's power, that wouldn't happen. we've gone too far to go back. >> the collateral thing, we keep forgetting part of what mccullough does is reaffirm the role of the supreme court itself. and i don't think the court under any reconstitution, no matter how much you go in either direction, is going to be the least bit interested in undermining itself. >> reversing mar berry, establishing its role to review. >>> you mention the federal rese