they gave her at the net they talked on the phone but they never even met but he was labeled as a palosi democrat and he lost that election and the g.o.p. has been using that time and time again and the special elections to come for our candidates to pin them as pelosi democrats so i do think it might be time for a change although i will say she is a master legislator that is there is no doubt about that but i'm concerned about her staying on board just because it's such good political warfare to link our candidates to her because her name is so unpopular with so many people. basically centrist people moderate republicans maybe even that might vote for a democrat but once they hear liberal palosi democrat would absolutely refuse to do so larry jen as palosi might be a problem on their say what might be a problem on yours is west virginia where an ex convict executive named don blankenship was in a heated battle so the g.o.p. nomination many are calling him the next roy moore if he were to come out as the republican candidate in west virginia if donald trump would go to wheeling to suppor

back to politics let's continue with the political panel robin isn't it going to do you want palosi to come back as the leader. you know i've got really mixed feelings on that and i'm not going to give you a direct answer because i'm still kind of soul searching to be honest look nancy pelosi is name is a nothing to so many people and her name is used a time and time again to divide the party it right here in the georgia six john who never even shared a room at any point with nancy pelosi they never even met they talked on the phone but they never even met but he was labeled as a palosi democrat and he lost that election and the g.o.p. has been using that time and time again and the special elections to come for our candidates to pin them as pelosi democrats so i do think it might be time for a change although i will say she is a master legislator that is there is no doubt about that but i'm concerned about her staying on board just because it's such a good political warfare to link our candidates to her because her name is so unpopular with so many people. basically centrist people mo

palosi have to say about that today take a listen he is preparing for a summit with the leader of north korea to focus on the nuclear ization so i think we all should give the president some leeway on preparing for this summit president terms dangerous action he's america isolated and we're going to iran erode our international credibility to a critical moment with north korea and it recklessly puts the catastrophic threat of a nuclear armed iran back on the table mr vosper carter does trump those he entered negotiations with kim jong only with a weaker hand because of his decision on iran. i think so i do take the point that the number of experts have expressed that obviously you know behind all the smiles which of course you have at the moment because they're building up to a summit about must each other there is absolute is zero trust on this historically and to the present day on either side of the aisle the potty if north korea is remotely whether informed about the us and it seems pretty weathered foam then it was always on the cards it was lowell a trumpet said he was going to do

win the midterms and that she will run for the speaker the conservatives love to hate and then sue palosi and hillary clinton hillary's been out of will hasn't held an office for a long time that they still hate her every day are you worried about from your standpoint is this a good idea jen for the republicans to have nancy say this. well i think this is the best thing to happen to republicans all week larry nancy pelosi has been acting like the marie antoinette of american politics saying that this massive tax cut that went to american families is like crumbs nancy pelosi could not be more out of touch as she and her husband run their businesses in northern california benefiting off of those american tax cuts by the way and she by the way got more than just ask her husband who runs that business but look this is comes down to the midterms comes down really to the three m's money message and motivation as robin just said this is why i like robin he's one of the more reasonable democrats he's honest he'll tell you the democrats really don't have the message down they haven't been able to

our constitutional commitments you know that's the vision and that's particularly how i differ from palosi one other thing i'd say there is aside from surveillance nancy pelosi was read into bush era torture of the sort that was implicated in the recent cia nomination and you know a lot of people were concerned about gina hospitals record on human rights but very few pin the tail on the donkey which is to say nancy pelosi learned about enhanced interrogation more than ten years ago and instead of raising an alarm as one would expect as one is required to do in that role she swept it under the rug and so whether it's surveillance whether it's torture and human rights whether. accountability for police violence on all of these issues she's really abandon the rights of her constituents and that's a big part of why i'm running i would describe nancy pelosi as the very embodiment of the party establishment she personifies it to a greater degree than anyone else in the party and when characterizing the conflicts in congress as one. that falls on the shoals of a partisan dysfunction that analysis

our constitutional commitments you know that's the vision and that's particularly how i differ from palosi one other thing i'd say there is aside from surveillance nancy pelosi was read into bush era torture of the sort that was implicated in the recent cia nomination and you know a lot of people were concerned about gina hospitals record on human rights but very few pin the tail on the donkey which is to say nancy pelosi learned about enhanced interrogation more than ten years ago and instead of raising an alarm as one would expect as one is required to do in that role she swept it under the rug and so whether it's surveillance whether it's torture and human rights whether. it's accountability for police violence on all of these issues she's really abandon the rights of her constituents and that's a big part of why i'm running i would describe nancy pelosi as the very embodiment of the party establishment she personifies it to a greater degree than anyone else in the party and when characterizing the conflicts in congress as one. that falls on the shoals of a partisan dysfunction that ana

of a palosi statement points to a lot of democrats and critics think which is essentially that north korea has taken the united states for a right here that kim jong un was able to secure what would have been a historic meeting between a sitting u.s. president and himself and to be seen as a legitimate actor on the world stage without really offering any concessions himself now it was always uncertain whether this meeting was actually going to take place or not there were a lot of warnings not to count your chickens before they hatch but already trump supporters us and republican lawmakers have been calling for him to win a nobel prize if he was successful in his efforts so i think what we're seeing now is trump has said that they're going to maintain strong sanctions on north korea and also his so-called maximum pressure campaign and it's not clear whether we're going to return to the kind of insults and threats that we heard as part of his rhetoric toward north korea earlier this year. or corresponding clear richardson in washington clear thank you very much. well ireland is holdin

close to the president continue to lose elections jose do you agree with palosi when she says impeachment should not be an issue in the campaign races in twenty eighteen i can tell you that the main issue should be like amy was saying immigration the economy health care you know millions of people larry have been losing their insurance their premiums their premiums have been going up because republicans continue to try to sabotage obamacare when they should be trying to improve it we got to remember and this is very important that under the trungpa ministration there advertisement of budget for open enrollment was cut they open enrollment period was cut by half so because they were trying. to confuse the american people so they wouldn't get health care so it's very dangerous and very upsetting and i'm disappointed of the way that the i mean instruction has has come forward and have handled the whole health care issue in america and we should the white house apologizing should kelly said keep her job or have to sing about mccain he's dying anyway. that was such a crass and ugly remark for

well certainly the predict the predictable responses came from the predictable people rob palosi and number of other democrats said that this was a disappointment and a mistake but generally republican lawmakers are supporting president trump and saying that he made the right move the white house made a briefing for reporters and issued some of the reasons that they say were behind the decision to call off the summit they called it a trail of broken promises from the north koreans which included the failure to allow any international experts to observe the destruction of that nuclear test site that we've been talking about also insulting language towards vice president mike pence by north korean officials and a situation in singapore recently where u.s. diplomats when men went to meet with their d p r k counterparts to talk about laying ground rules and agendas for the summit but the north koreans never showed up so those are some of the reasons that the white house is giving for this sudden decision it does appear though that one thing is certain that president trump will not have t