how are you? i'm marcus. >> how you doing?rian, pleasure, welcome. >> nice to meet you. >> you too. >> it's a little bit bigger than i thought it was gonna be. >> 1,800 different skus of wine in this space. >> is that what's in here, 1,800? >> yeah. >> huh. no one has time to look at 1,800 varieties. i'd be willing to bet that half of it doesn't even sell. how long have you worked here? >> today's my second day. >> is it? >> yeah. >> look what you were signing up for. >> every day's not gonna be like this? >> no, gonna get much worse. >> [laughs] >> take a walk around, just check it out. is the owner here? >> um...not sure. [scanner beeps] >> your total today's gonna be $56.86, sir. >> i'm marcus. >> i'm daniel. >> what do you do here? >> i specialize in the beer, definitely. so i mean, i've been in--i've been in the scene for about four years now. >> the beer scene? >> the beer scene. just kind of learning everything i can. i do a lot of research. >> how do you know what to pick? >> ugh, a lot of drinking. a lot of drinking a

>> they both figured out how to take a new network technology and make it work for them. >> host: how did they do that? >> guest: martin luther had a great advantage. when he attacked his 95 theses to the church door they were able to from there to this new technology and be disseminated across - luther's ideas were not unique, were not unusual. multiple clergyman making those arguments previously but the reach of their message was limited to the reach of their voice and suddenly martin luther, the printing press made him the first mass media evangelist and it took off. >> host: mark zuckerberg had a similar situation. mark zuckerberg continued to evolve as we move from the wired internet to the wireless internet and there was a point in the history of facebook where there were serious concerns as to whether they were keeping up with the fact the world was going around and he made a pivot and succeeded. both of them were enabled by new network technology. >> host: in your new book "from gutenberg to google: the history of our future" you talk about it is not necessarily the inventors

i want to see how he meets deadlines, how he spends money, how we works with others, how much of theollow through on something that he started? so, you got the plan here. chandler: yeah, i think we're good. for sure. okay. greg: let's do it. ♪ jennifer: thanks. chandler: thank you. man: welcome. hey, hey, hey. lemonis: what's happening, guys? man: bud, how you doing? lemonis: we're already gonna move forward with mass-producing jennifer's sauces, but i also want to see how open-minded the family is to other ideas, so i'm taking them to a meat co-packer to see if there's a way to take her recipes and some of her ideas and get them into the prepared food sections of grocery stores. and ultimately, whether or not jennifer's on-board with co-packing her meat, i just want her to be more open to ideas and see what their process is, and i particularly want to see how chandler's going to handle this. so, i wanted to bring you to beef international to explore how to potentially package and distribute pre-prepared foods. jennifer: okay. tarantino: our job is to figure out from you what makes y

important to look at what kind of assets people own and how those assets appreciate, how they create diversification and household balance sheets. one thing we have been looking a lot at is the fact that, for many black and latino families we see lower levels of investment, lower levels of assets, we see more concentration in assets that are depreciating, like cars, or housing assets that have not recovered in their value since the recession. so thinking what kind of assets people own is important in thinking about business assets. opportunityk about zones we think about investments in real estate in low-income communities, businesses and low income communities, are those going to grow into is going to benefit from the value created in these investments? that is what we are here to talk about today. our panelists are qualified to talk about this, not only because they played a role in creating this idea of opportunity zones, but they have been on the front lines of trying to set the stage for how this new tool might unfold over time. we will be in dialogue for about 45 minutes and th

it is how this happened. how these safeguards did not work. and, every safeguard that was in place, they all broke down. dent, he was an obvious outlier. of surgeonsority are good, capable people who care about their patients. yes, thank you, but it was of course you that worked out that the medical error is the third leading cause of death in the united states. of ratee are a lot doctors, we are not trying to malign the profession, and figure out why as journalists and as public intellectuals, he cannot somehow get the system whatever that is to respond in a useful way. you do not need to defend, we get it. likel have doctors that we , trust, and respect. do not undercut your own work. decisiondid make a that i was going to assume that people were starting from ground zero. it, telling a podcast, started listening to a lot of podcasts after i got the assignment. i did not have a lot of the tools that other journalists telling stories have. for example, there were not going to be any plot twists. guilty,who you think is he really was guilty. t

data, how is it going to change how e.p.a. does environmental policy? you kind of answered that one. in 10 years will the states be the leaders in environmental solutions, outstripping e.p.a.? or will they be moving together hand in hand? >> moving together hand in hand. >> good. i hope you all will join me in congratulating the panel. [applause] i totally impaired ben, which i intended to do. but thank you all very much. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2019] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its captioning content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org.] >> hi, everybody. we are going to dive right in because we have five incredible panelists today. please take a seat. i'm the executive

for example, how many complaints did they handle, how many cases did they bring, how much money did they recover? but what do these metrics truly mean for the consumer financial system overall? if we succeed in fostering a culture of compliance and preventing harm, we would expect the number of complaints and the number of meritorious complaints to decline. we would likewise expect the number and size of cases shrink as well. or a reduction in cases filed could mean we are focused on more complex cases. these questions underscore the challenge of focusing on outcomes and also demonstrate the incomplete lens of outputs. the bureau's work must be measured by how will we use all of our tools to prevent consumer harm. in the coming years, we will be working within the bureau and with our stakeholders to develop the most appropriate ways to measure progress in preventing harm. before closing, i want to reiterate my commitment to engagement with all of the bureau's stakeholders. all of you want to prevent consumer harm and see consumers have access to fair, transparent and competitive markets.

-lemonis: how are you? -brooke: how are you? -lemonis: good to see you., for you. brooke: we talked about that. i actually love the blush with the gray. it's one of my favorite color combinations. it went from being a little masculine to, "those are cute. i want to buy those," and have a more emotional response to it. patrick: yay. lemonis: what i will say about patrick is that he stepped up. he made all of the changes that bloomingdale's asked for, and that shows me that he's now open to other people's ideas. and what i feel best about is it confirms my investment in him. our new women's line is more than just novelty screen-printed t-shirts. we have v-necks, shorts, hoodies, and lots of other athleisure wear. kelly: this is our new collection. this is dilascia. patrick: you can take the sleeves off, so it's also a vest. -woman: oh, wow. lemonis: what do you think of the cut? woman #2: it's perfect. it drapes nicely. -lemonis: yeah. -patrick: we call it athleisure. woman #2: this is so cool. i will totally get this. lemonis: we now have a process in plac

this is how i want things this is how things used to be this is your role i feel threatened by you for example when you have male ministers having the power to stand up and say ok so now i'm going to put here in this anti pornography law that women who wear miniskirts it is now illegal because it's got such a way or cause men to behave like this are you to us i mean monday i'm going to come to you just now i want to come to a fat boy who by the way is really not at all fat. to ask about this things he is saying men are just throwing tantrums you're just and secure how do you feel about that essentially i think change is ok but if it comes to quickly i think some people may have trouble adapting to these new changes and who is having problem with the pace of the change i think society in general because of the way families are organized will have to change the way the workplace is organized has changed and things are changing gradually so for them to be complaining that women are having it rough they're not given these opportunities something which will do you live in it's like they're

they need to nail down, how does he use social media, how is it vetted, how is material information embedded. emily: what is it that they need to back ahead of time? the: the issue is that judge was a clarified agreement that would make clear how his tweets are being reviewed, are they being reviewed ahead of time or not. emily: in the meantime, there was a debate about a specific tweet and in the middle of this, musk tweeted out tweets.her dana: in his view, he is not tweeting material information and has discretion. in the sec's view, he is violating the agreement he agreed to in the fall. the judge made it clear she wants them to resolve this. she wants them to put on their adult pants and work this thing out. emily: is there any indication how the judge reviewed musk's behavior? dana: not today. she approved the extension. emily: so what happens next? obviously there were concerns about deliveries, first it was is the us first there were concerns about production, now it is about deliveries. what numbers are we watching for? dana: this is a big week for tesla. media havenly, no been invi

and how they helped the u.s. defeat japan. >> let me call back into session our symposium on guadalcanal. brought you under the auspices of the museum's institute for the study of war and democracy. our next speaker, i am very, very pleased to introduce to you, trent hone is one of the leading authorities in the country on u.s. navy tactics and auction. he is the winner of awards from the u.s. naval war college. and the naval history and heritage command. his latest book, which i have read quite recently, and was extremely impressed by. learning war. the evolution of lighting doctrine in the u.s. navy. it reminds us of something important. that what happens today is often completely dependent on things that happened yesterday. and in fact, that happened over the course of many yesterday's. and, that they are then used to formulate doctrine and ideas for generations. to come. you know, learning war was reviewed in the new york times review of books by no less than - an individual than tom ricks who writes for the

how about our own health and mental health? how about how clean our air and water are? how about average income and affordability? [applause] mr. yang: these are the problems of this era. gdp is at a record high but life expectancy has gotten shorter for the past three years. our life expectancy has gotten shorter because drug overdoses and suicides have overtaken vehicle deaths as cause of death in this country for the first time in our history. the last time our life expectancy declined three years in a row? the great flu pandemic of 1918, the spanish flu. that is the last time our life expectancy three years in a row and yet we celebrate gdp that means nothing while our people are dying earlier. we have to shift the measurements to something that will reflect how we are doing, and as president, i will reflect on these numbers and present them every year at the state of the union with a powerpoint, i will be the first president to use powerpoint at the state of the union. [applause] mr. yang: that is right. you will get something out of the state of union instead of t

how do we address that? >> i will admit i have not read the piece, but my observations match a lot with what ed was saying, we are in a moment of great awakening. i actually don't see that indifference at all, really. energy,stead incredible attention, and strong new fresh messaging coming from young people. not just here but in europe. i spent all day reading about the rebellion movement going on in london right now. we are working on a piece about it and it's fascinating the link which they are using, the civil disobedience tactics they are using to disrupt, barricade roads, but they are talking about this is a serious emergency, a crisis. we need drastic, drastic changes now. and i think it is really refreshing to have a lot of strong voices out there now calling for rapid, drastic changes. and these are young people saying, hey, you have been cooking the planet. you have been cooking the planet and we are fed up and we don't want this and you have to act now. a swedish activist has also been great on thi

how will that affect

how did you start pursuing this? >> so we had first started looking into criminal justice in elk heart county because of some wrongful conviction cases. then after we had found a lot of problematic things in one of these cases in particular, we wanted to look at accountability in the police department in general. when there were mistakes and misconduct happening in the department, how that was being dealt with and what the outcomes were, to see what the culture was like in the department, and so we started basically trying to compile a fairly comprehensive list of disciplinary cases and how they ultimately were resolved. in doing that, we actually ended up stumbling on a case where these two officers had been written up for excessive force. we didn't know exactly what it was about. disciplinary cases in the department under the now former chief but the chief at the time that we were doing the reporting were very few and far between. and there had been a very steep drop-off in officers who were being written up for mi

report, how they respond to it and how they talk publicly. think many americans will sit down and read the 400-plus pages of the report. unfortunately, me and garrison were stuck doing it over the last few days. but most americans aren't going to do it. they're going to read "the new york times." they're going to read "the washington post." they're going to watch cable news and gather information like that. and the president is watching closely. he's trying to see how this is spun. and we'll see if the american people, what their judgment is. ultima ultimately, they're going to matter. they're going to vote on 2020 whether he did something wrong or not. >> ultimately, bishop, wouldn't whatever the president has to say about the report, had more validation to it if he read the darn thing? >> i typically would agree with that, that ignorance is not going to be excuse in this. and in order to be educated on the report and in order to actually comment on it, from an educated perspective, you need to read it and you need to find out what's in it a

how little or how much oxygen is in the air you breathe.olivia, the people's connection to the land is inseparable from their health. but i think that's true for all of us. no matter where we live, we are products of our environments. but we also have the tools to make our hearts the healthiest in the world. >>> the following is a cnn special report. >>> we're going to work with the people who are so addicted and we're going to try like hell to get them off that addiction. >> a national epidemic. trump campaigned to end it. as president, he promised to fix it. >> the scourge of drug addiction in america will stop. it will stop. >> but one year later -- it hasn't stopped. people are still dying. 115 americans die every day from an opioid overdose. more than car accidents, breast cancer or guns.

caroline: we look forward to seeing how the battle continues to unfold and how new companies continuee nasdaq. we thank you very much. still ahead, will humans merge with machines? elon musk may be close to developing the technology to do so. we will discuss that next. this is bloomberg. ♪ caroline: softbank is increasing its that on insurance leading a funding round. a company which uses ai to speed up claims to process rent from homeowners based $175 million from softbank and others. from says it plans to use the money to expand globally and s.fer new product meanwhile, santos may have, one step closer -- may have come one step closer to connecting your brain to computers. a team with links to elon musk have outlined a system that plugs electrical wiring into the brains of rats. joining us to explain more, sarah mcbride in san francisco. talk to us about this amazing discovery. scientists say they have done is invented something called a neural sewing machine. that means a needle which can go inside your brain rapid fire just like a sewing machine needle and plant lots of electrodes

how far are the democrats willing to go on this? how far will republicans go to stop this? effort by the democrats to get the contents of the full robert mueller report. we argued yesterday that this has been the practice and whether it was the special counsel. the report was delivered upon its completion along with 17 boxes of documents that supported the contents of the report. the asked the court to get authority for the grand jury testimony and it was produced. this was an investigation begun because our democracy was attacked by a foreign entity and on behalf of the american people. have fought hard to protect robert mueller to complete his work. we have the right see the full contents of the report and the american public has the right to see as much of it as we can. we can do this in a classified setting. responsible for taking action if there is misconduct by the president, not the attorney general. the democrats on the committee authorizing to be the chairman to issue a subpoena to compel its production. we are hopeful the attorney general reconsider his view. plea

how do we bring them in? a lot of them are solo practitioners that for many reasons have said, it is easier for me to operate my practice out here separately. but we need to, whether it is leveraging new technologies and programs, telehealth is growing, and behavioral health is a growing area for telemedicine to help address some of the shortages, but those are only band-aids. we really do need to figure out how we can increase the provider workforce for substance abuse disorder and other mental health items. susan: as we close here, a minute left, people hear so much about big data. i am wondering about the concern on the part of the public about the use of devices that track things that are innocuous like exercise habits or their searches on the internet, and the fear that companies will be scooping up this data and use it to deny them certain kinds of coverage. what kind of assurances can you give? matt: i can say unequivocally that our industry does not use data for that purpose. we are -- under the affor

how to ask for it. so we would always, when we had differences of opinions at the dinner table, we were always talking about things. one of the points of pride for my dad was when i became an attorney. that was first lawyer in the family. it was something he had always anted to do. so i have a family that really cares about our community, cares about our homes, and that's what got me excited about politics. host: how would you describe your political philosophy? and did your parents shape that or who shaped that? ms. torres small: for me it's a lot more about a philosophy for my home. i grew up in a place that's sometimes seen as a forgotten part of a flyover state, yet i'm so proud of how we have a history and a way of working together. so when there are problems in las cruces or in southern new mexico, people come together from industry, from the nonprofit world from schools, from anything to find a olution. i'm so proud of that i think that's something that isn't happening in d.c. so part of what mad

how did you get into this?iel: [laughing] early.nto a most of my research is into building systems, designing systems. host: so you are not a scientist? daniel: i have the benefit of many collaborators who are computer scientist, and we work together on exploring what it example,build, for services on the web that are more accountable from a privacy perspective, how can we keep track of how personal information is used? how do we make sure these new artificial intelligence systems being built, and machine learning systems, are explainable and interoperable? how do we make sure that when they make decisions about human beings, human beings can come back and say, why did you decide that about me, why is that what my credit rating is, why did you stop me on the street on the suspicion of some crime? we want to make systems that are more responsive to the people who use them. that takes a combination of a legal and liberal arts perspective with an in-depth technical computer science perspective. host: in today's wo

how "how well does thomas play the violin?" ' "how well does thomas play the violin?"e. it is completely obvious what the answers are. let's see if we can listen to what the home office says is your voice, it proves that you are cheating, we will see if it sounds like you. i would like to welcome all of you to the gallery, we are currently showing the works of german photographer bruno keller, whose photography has never before been shown in north america. you will see photos from the trip to chile, argentina and brazil. please follow me to the exhibit. that is supposed to be you. according to the home office, clearly, it is not my voice. so, thatis clearly, it is not my voice. so, that is enough, isn't it, to show they have made a mistake?m that is enough, isn't it, to show they have made a mistake? it is a mistake made by the home office, the problem is they are in denial. the response from the home office was some sort of picture of denial. obfuscation and delay. it was not helpful. the american company that administered the test told the home office they had conduc

and how good it could have been. president trump says the dow would be 10,000 points higher but for an aggressive fed. ecb president draghi steps into defend the fed's independence. welcome to "bloomberg daybreak." i'm david westin, alongside lisa abramovitz. alix steel on assignment today. lisa: i think this is fascinating, tiger woods among back with his first major win in more than a decade, 43 years old, after all of the personal issues he has gone through, showing that he is still a winner and showing his star power, frankly. ago he wastwo years saying he wasn't sure if he was going to get to play golf again at all. putt, he just roared. lisa: in the markets come a tepid action across the board. on futures up slightly constructive talk about trade. stocks in europe a little higher. the euro gaining barely, basically flat. i think the biggest story of the day is crude. you did get a read that production out of the u.s. was more than people expected, setting prices a little lower. david: it is time now for the mor

caller: how are you folks? my question, i am going to keep it in health care, although i have a lot of questions for you folks and your business. i think one of the problems in this goes with health care. you said earlier, one of you did, that people do not like to get into the details. well, that is where the answers in the problems are, in the details. inn will one of you folks the journalism business, who, for the people who clamor for health care for all, get down and ask them questions about, this is a price control procedure -- a price control, procedure can come home -- procedure control, and my question concerning politicians who want health care for for all -- is it going to affect them? washington people too often impose their ideas upon the rest of the people and do not live by what they vote for. so in health care for all -- and i am going to pick on aoc here because she seems to be the whipping post for things to go wrong, and i do not agree with her policies at all. in fact, i think she got cheate

that's not how we're going to do this. here's how i see this. i'll tell you how i see it.m full of people here who weren't given anything. we got a room full of people here who had to fight for what they believe in. we have a room full of people here who had to reach down deep, and no matter how hard it was, no matter how scary it looked, they found what they needed to find, and they brought it up, and they took care of the people they love. they fought the fights they believe in. that's how they got into these seats today. you know, this is how i see it from where i sit. i was in middle school when -- it's just my mom and my daddy and my -- me. the boys are gone, my three older brothers. they've all gone off to the military. my daddy has a heart attack. everybody thinks he is going to die. he comes back home. he can't work. my mother has never worked outside the home. we lose our family station wagon. my mother is terrified. i hear at night, i hear her cry. i learn words like mortgage and foreclosure from my parents late at night while i'm supposed to be asleep. and i do

look for how greening neighborhoods, views of green and how it makes us happier and healthier. the city of cambridge, massachusetts, did surveys about happiness and they said if you live on a street with trees, for example, it's the equivalent in terms of health of being four years younger and it was the quiequivalent of being $10,000 0 wealthier. u.s. planners can't $10,000 a year into anybody's pocket and you can't make them four years younger but you can make them healthier and happier and you can do that things like the planning code and the public benefits that come from development. things that we were talking about earlier. if you in a rear yard, some green in it. so it would require us to think about the public open spaces in a different way. a quarter of the land area is in the right-of-way, city streets, using to move and store automobiles. so making your developments less automobile dependent is certainly a way to do that but seeing if we can reclaim that space for people is another way promote health, happiness and bio diversity and we support the goals of this reso

about how much this cost. each time you say, should be put trillions into it, although i think we are talking billions, but you can afford to put billions in the system. someone is paying. someone is paying the billions of dollars and i think the public ought to take on more of that . >> i want to turn to a point that several of you have brought up during the conversation which is the dichotomy between the middle- class problem on higher education and everyone below the middle class are what you may see lower middle class. to me, when i go in we are sitting here in the united states senate when i go in and talk to members of the staff or when i see 20/20 candidates on stage with students, it's almost always someone who has a graduate degree from georgetown and they are concerned about the high level of debt with a graduate degree from georgetown. that person in my estimation is going to be fine. so, how do we but, that person is also more politically powerful than all the people who are not going to be fine. s

how did it come about?ny months ago, they came to us and said i think there is this amazing story about this long-lost gold and this family looking for it. they think it is in a european vault of a bank. we said that is really interesting, one of you go see what you can find. the story is the culmination of that. carol: it is unbelievable, and it goes on for a while. >> it is the longest story we have published on my watch. it's a breath taking story. you'll probably get to watch some day as a netflix movie, it is that good. >> they have been working on this. >> it is like chapter after chapter. what it is really about is the lawyer who has put himself in the middle between the family who thinks there is gold and the banks who say we don't know what you are talking about. >> a fascinating story. carol: thank you so much, we got more from joe. >> i picked up the phone and got the guy live. i did not have the heart to say i don't care, goodbye. he said he wanted to meet me because he needed to tell me about h

we also know how crucial they are. to the health of not just plants and animals but also to our health. so no, they do not need to be cute. >> you mentioned you got kids into the writing process of this book. can you tell us more about how you picked the animals in the book and how much the writing was informed by your own kids or other kids? >> i was very much into, my daughter was four and a half, she was a lot younger when i started writing it but she already had strong.opinions. she was loyal to her favorite animal, sharks. i knew i couldn't write about endangered species and not include a shock. there are a number of subspecies to choose from because we kill about 100 million sharks every year. six to 8% of the shark population last year was killed sometimes through being caught in fishing nets, often because of shark thinning for shark fin soup, personally, there were a number number of sharks to choose from. i talked to etiquette about what animals they really felt drawn to, it was really moving to me how many k

can you give us a flavor of how those conversations have gone and how you see this visit setting the stage for the future relationship between the united states and iraq? >> translator: thank you, nancy. we found a very much welcoming here in the united states. they welcomed us greatly. and i ensure that these conversations will contribute to help both people's, the americans and the iraqis, and the joint efforts that have been in the past and still going on between the united states and iraq and in general with the international community. we are partners in the fight against isis, just like i said, we defeated to finish not only this organization but the extremist idealology which will lead us to some how support for the lodgistic training and this is very very important for the armed forces. all of the three presidencies in iraq, the executive branch, the legislative branch that by prime minister and his exlen si. we are all united in our effort to work with international partners and international coalition to defeat this extremist organization once and for all. there are so many

megan: how are you? matt: how's it going? lemonis: how are you? i'm marcus. megan: hi, marcus.to meet you. lemonis: nice to meet you. matt: here you go. megan: thank you so much. lemonis: why do you choose delivery as opposed to going to a dispensary? megan: i choose it for convenience. i'm a parent. i can't always go to a dispensary. if a kid's with me, that's impossible. lemonis: right. megan: i also like the fact that it's discreet if it needs to be. lemonis: megan dooley fisher told me she uses cannabis to treat the pain she suffers from her auto-immune disease. and she uses a lot. how long will this last you? megan: okay. well, i'm probably a far heavier user than almost anybody out there. lemonis: okay. megan: this is 250 milligrams. i could eat this right now and go on with my day. you would never know anything. lemonis: 250 milligrams? megan: i'll eat that whole bag. lemonis: okay. so, i've never used. how much could i have? megan: i would say that you wouldn't even have one of these. you would have to start with a 2.5 milligram. lemonis: and you could eat this whole ba

david: the great recession comes, and how did you survive it and how close did you come to not surviving ken: survival is the right choice of words. it was the only moment in the history of citadel that our actual existence was in question. david: did you think it might not survive? ken: i will make it very clear. i would go home on a friday. if morgan stanley did not open for business on monday, i would be done by wednesday. if you remember morgan stanley, the question was with the japanese follow-through on the financing commitment. their very existence was in question. you quickly come to terms with the fact we may not survive. it may be an exogenous event in some sense that causes us to fail. i have to accept that reality. now that i have accepted that reality, what are the best decisions we can make to survive? that was the playbook we came to work with every day. we are going to fight to survive knowing we might fail, but we are not going to give up. david: how does somebody invest with citadel, and is there a minimum? how long should they hold the money with you? [laughter] ken: s

how are you? -how are you? -are you chef leticia? -yes, i am. are you the head boss in charge?an empire this big, you gotta work. she comes in at 5:00 every morning and puts in almost 70 hours a week. we do two tons of crab legs a day. -two tons? -two tons. that's how many crab legs will be put through this little station right here. so there's none left for america? they're all gone. lemonis: it's not just crab legs. in a year, they'll dish out nearly 3 million pieces of dim sum, 650,000 oysters, and more than a half a million sliders. -do you do all the buying? -yes, i do. -for the whole place? -yes, i do. that's the bulk of my job, financials, the managing of money, and making sure that we don't run out of any single item. what if there's a shortage? oh, then we have a crisis. we will have very upset guests. the next time you're stressing over dinner, keep in mind that chef leticia and her team will serve a million people every year. yeah, one million. ♪ -this is the big leagues. -this is it, yeah. this is the biggest experience in las vegas, is it not? the biggest buffet? -

is about how john f.ennedy put all these political chips on the idea about going to the moon by the end of the. 1960's the big gnome -- the big moment was made 25th, 1961. he gave an afternoon speech to joint session of congress.

we need to be thoughtful about how perpetrators use the platform, how victims use it, how people seekings who are 10,000 miles away use a service like twitter to make sure people can trust the information they find, and that they are comfortable being part of the conversation. emily: what is interesting about the sri lanka situation, that the government shut down the services without any evidence that the crime was spun up on social media, but because they were concerned about misinformation and violence spreading on social media in the aftermath. isn't that a concern, that that's the first reaction of an entire country? ned: it tells you there is still work for us and others to do, as well, in making sure people can trust the information on a service like ours, that it is being used appropriately. it's the reason why health is our number one priority, both from a resourcing perspective and a mindset perspective. emily: my interview with twitter cfo ned segal. i want to bring back ventures partner om malik, and on the phone forrester senior analyst jessica lu. you heard ned's responses t

how he took on the kavanaugh nomination is how he leads. he picks where his goals are and then he might not get style points, but he always gets pretty much what he wants done. the -- jake: the interesting thing about that process was during the nomination, the president and mitch mcconnell spoke and mcconnell told the president you better be ready to pop another supreme court nominee if kavanaugh goes sideways. during the hearing when ,hristine blasey ford testified mcconnell called president trump after the testimony and said we are at the halftime, let's see how it looks at the end of the game. the president in our interview, said we worked with a lot of people but mitch was really strong for us. host: talk about what did republicans accomplish while they control both chambers and the white house. anna: they clearly got a once in a generation tax bill through. that was the biggest accomplishment by far in his first two years. the book sets up well and you forget so many things happening all the time. health care imploded quickly in the b

a helpful hint about how your government works.you ever see consensus forming in washington run. something awful is about to happen. it was a total consensus that our trade deals could not be better and helped everyone. america's manufacturing sector died and huge parts of the middle-class died. and then bipartisan consensus on the iraq war and weapons of mass destruction that we would find there and didn't. and there was consensus on the banking regulation before the financial crisis hit. and consensus on an all-seeing state that is now scanning your face and reading your text. there was much debut about those policies. it should have been. a new consensus is forming about our southern border. it may look bad, but calm down, it's fine. everything is just fine! that's the new word from max boot a columnist for jeff besos. here's the latest. this is from boot's appearance on cnn last night. >> i am ready to declare a national emergency. it's not on the southern border. it's in washington, d.c., but the president who is lawless and o

we want to raise questions in their mind, how bad could it be, how would it affect me and what can i do and when should i begin? we want to provide simple answers and we need to make authorities available overtime to reinforce the message. the key findings that came out of this i find very empowering. when people understand there is something they can do to reduce their vulnerability they are more apt to act. we found this over and over again with fire wise. in terms of continuing that education and learning and providing information this is just an example of a new course we put up not long ago understanding the wildfire threat. i apologize for the long url, your best googleing the title to find it. it is a free short course you can test your knowledge and it is a good primer for the average citizen to take a look and understand the problem. the other research that i think is very telling and very helpful is the diffusion of innovation theory. this is something where they look at how do communities adopt new behaviors? usually you have the wild and crazy innovators, one or 2 people

how do we take it and how do we really make it come alive? one thing, and all of those that are participating from the administration that i would recommend and we've been recommending for a while, is let's make the u.s. water strategy part of the national security strategy of the united states. when you elevate it to that level, everyone is paying attention to it. so we've got a great start, but let's take it that next step. it's really important to do that. it's hard to keep our focus on the global water crisis when there's so many other things happening. there's so many other crises happening. we see them in the newspaper and in the headlines all the time. but we have to keep our focus there because the water crisis isn't going away, it's only going to get more challenging. the crisis is real, and we can make progress. this strategy is progress. and we should celebrate that and use that. one of the really satisfying things that we've been able to do with our group is to be part of this u.s. water partnership that was started seven years ag

how -- how do we get ahead of things? the other piece here and we've touched on it briefly is we're about to usher in a new age of technology. we're on the dawn of a new -- some major changes, if we adapt we'll be able to take advantage of it. and increase our dominance in space. >> maybe this last question for secretary wilson. and with that in mind are the increments important? i appreciate what -- i appreciate what my colleagues are saying about why is this in the plan or why isn't that part of the proposal or regard or reserves or others and things? and aren't the increments an important part of the rollout? we're not -- we're not going from here to here. we see here but we're going incrementally? is that not an important part of the strategy? >> i'm not sure it's incremental. i do believe that what we have now is a set of programs that support a strategy to dominate in space. we all prefer that space remains peaceful because everyone loses if war extends into space. but we're developing the capabilities to deter and

and how does that look? how can we make sure that institutions that are not doing the right thing by students do you continue to allow them to benefit from that program for enrollment's sake, or do you have semicontrols he are equally as matched as their peering. i have to say the national lents on tennessee, just being inside of the state has helped us to really understand, yes, we did a great thing by providing community college, but when we look at some reports and show this is benefiting high-income families and also maybe low-income students fall through the cracks because of performancist forced us to think about how can we improve that. >> i think dr. morgan is right you could get more accountability through this system. that tends to come into accountability as it does in other countries. we have to remember that we're up to now, i think on kids out at the -- we have a massive persistants problem, and we have growing evidence that actually make colleges ready for the students, so worrying less about

brian: how did she get over it? it is depression, she had it for how long, do you think?usan: about six months. at one point she told her doctor and he did not take it very seriously. they discussed that later. she never really thought -- really sought medical treatment for it. the only person she talked to was her husband. she eventually felt better, she's not sure why. she went and volunteered at a washington hospice. that made her feel better, taking care of someone else. hasn: the next page something that has not gotten a lot of attention, although it has gotten some -- jennifer fitzgerald. how big a deal with that in her depression, and who was she? susan: jennifer fitzgerald was an aide to george h.w. bush. george bush hired her when he went to china, she went to china with the bushes. and continued to be close to him, worked closely with him until he became president. there have long been rumors about a personal affair between president bush and jennifer fitzgerald. i think it is important to note that president bush and barbara bush and jennifer fitzgerald all den

. >> being an american means being free, i'm free to live how i choose him believe how it choose, to raise my family the way i want to. it's also a responsibility. i think it's important to educate yourself to protect being an american, making good, educated decisions when you are at the ballot box. >> voices from the road on c-span. at our table is the political andor with national journal a political reporter, thank you both for being here. you for being here. i will begin with you. let's talk about the two weeks that lawmakers have been back in their districts, in their state spirit what are they hearing from their constituents, and how is leadership alan singh the desire for, by some in the democratic party, -- how is leadership balancing the desire for, by some in the democratic party, with the legislative agenda? guest: the hearing is about the legislative agenda they are not hearing about impeachment. people are not talking about russia. aids, even the most liberal districts, they were not talking about that. they talk about potholes and the high cost of their health care. tha

how do you prevent that?you can put boards and audits and still go crazy. >> how does the money get here. they are start and maintained by money given by the kong immigration. the standard is 10% of your yearly earnings. they can take it right out of your bank account. they make up the pile of money spent on construction, mission work, av equipment and coffee shop supplies and salaries. the mega church pastors are on independently run boards. they determine reasonable ways for each pastor on the board. what's reasonable? god only knows. they didn't tell us. >> texas is a very political state. >> do you ever bring up the things going on in a political moment in your services? >> i have done things like what would jesus say it to lebron james or donald trump? what would jesus say to -- >> slow down. what would he say to donald trump? >> get behind satan! >> i try bible in one hand and newspaper in the other. our message is go out and vote. i never endorsed somebody. >> given the polarizing moment where we see w

how did jews become white? that's telling you something about how jews were categorized, racialized themselves in that american identity and jewish identity weren't seen as synonymous. the same way we see extreme nationalism in jewish was brought over. that role of anti-semitism has been played, and terms of constructing white individuality is the same. that's what i see in a lot of muslim rhetoric i encounter in europe and even now in the united states. serious debates in britain and germany of can you be muslim in french? can you be muslim in american? ilhan omar couldn't be american because she wore a hijab, right? that stereotype if you're in this racial religious category, you can't be one of us. that is one of the conducting points between anti-semitism and islamophobia that i think we need to pay a lot more attention to than we have. and finally, i'll say on that point, we need to pay careful attention to how many political operatives pit jews and muslims against each other for larger, more insidious pur

the how to bring that in. next month, the tenderloin housing clinic is starting residency at the bristol. these are larger units, in a nice building and will not have the intensive housing. and there are in addition to the bristol, there are a couple of existing step up buildings within the portfolio. so transitions point, we work with transitions, the intensive case management programs, acas conferences with d.p.h. we also work really closely with in-house support services through h.s.a., through daas. we have done some really exciting pilots, one of them at the kelly cullen supportive housing site, where we try to have clinicians with in home support services. one of the few reasons people lose permanent supportive housing is hoarding and cluttering and sort of inability to maintain their unit. so ihss is a critical part of housing andci critical partnership. we -- when we did the retreat on collaboration, one of the things that we came to is that the earlier we case conference when someone else housing is u

how can we keep track of how personalinformation is used? how do we make sure there's these new intelligence systems being built and machine learning systems are explainable and interpretable . how do we make sure thatwhen they make decisions about human beings , human beings can come back and say why did you decide that about me ? why is that what my credit rating is? why did you stop me on the street in the suspicion of some crime weston arc we want to make systems more responsive to people who use them and that takes a combination of legal and liberal arts perspectives with an in-depth technical computer science perspective. >> so in today's world liberal arts is not necessarily dead yet? >> liberal arts is always at the center of the way we think about the world because it's about how people function. computer science is about how to build great systems that do great things for people but to understand what those systems should do, how they should interact with people you need a combination. i'll give you an example. where having an enor