mr. stein think would concur that not only the commemoration of these events, i did not come out until i left the seminary in 1983. i went into the peace corps and i won the most comprehensive case in the peace corps when i was wrongly fired. one of the things they fired me for was being gay in senegal. also, i have my masters divinity. my last paper at catholic university was same gender marriages. what we do not realize is that what we need is a vehicle of veracity with a capacity to uphold those self-evident truths. what we would like i would think we need, with all of the talk and everything is good about the reparations, about voting rights, about equal access. i got fired by trinity church, standing up for a south african transgendered woman to use the woman's bathroom. we need human rights court. host: i'm going to stop you there and give our chat -- give our guest a chance to respond. thank you for sharing your story. guest: one of the things the caller emphasized was religion. oppressi

steve: tony thanks for the call. , mr. stein? marc: on the question, first quantitation is very difficult. we have lots of surveys stretching back to the kinsey studies in the 1940's and 1950's. if the question is asked narrowly we tend to get reports of 1% to 3% to 10% of the population, but if the question is asked broadly, we start to have much, much larger numbers. when you think of "queer," that term has been invoked to represent a much broader array of people, and it represents everybody who has ever had a moment of same-sex desire, everybody who has ever transgressed gender in every aspect of their life. we start to get much larger percentages. we might even say 100% of the population is potentially queer, although not of course, not everybody lives that life and claims that identity. so it really depends on how we ask the question, how do we define those letters of the alphabet. with respect to the current moment and whether we're making progress, taking a step back, you know, i think in many respects, these things tend t

and i just write that mr stein my said. org knowledged. there's excitement ahead of the big match. these players are temporary friends. some won't make the cut. others will be snatched up by bigger clubs. scouts have their eye on the 13 and 14 year olds and are sometimes quite aggressive in their recruiting techniques says. the head of the academy. a prime example in germany of kids being recruited away we've lost 50 players to bigger academies in the past 3 years that's huge we discovered or supported 50 talented players that we've done last. if there's one small shine it's run the academy for 4 years talks to the coaches every day about the youth development. of course to build up the team but also to cash in if the players transfer to other clubs. in such a case or device gets the money for the training costs mesut ozil brought in almost 1000000 euros. of course money comes in but you shouldn't forget that you don't get her nerves or lever year i wouldn't venture to say that there are $4.00 guys out there today who bring in $500000.00 euros in 6 years so let's build a club house

mr. stein, william prison station on stoma. -- brilliant presentation on stonewall. find this highly informative. the lgbtqis community? how large is the demographic? i am sure the statistics are hard to get out because of closeted people, but i would like to know that. as an historian, are you concerned? -- i am concerned as a white male about injustice for anybody who is not white over the last couple years. i am wondering that as an historian, if you have a view, are we going backwards as a society in general in terms of social justice movements? things would be helpful. thank you. host: thank you for the call. mr. stein? onst: on the first step -- the first question, quantification is very difficult. we have lots of surveys stretching back to the kinsey studies in the 19 50's. if the question is as narrowly, we tend to get reports of one to three to five to 10% of the population. the question is asked broadly, we tend to have much more broad numbers. when we think of the term queer, that is meant to represent a broader away -- a broader array of people. it repres

mr. stein, william prison station on stoma. -- brilliant presentation on stonewall.ind this highly informative. the lgbtqis community? how large is the demographic? i am sure the statistics are hard to get out because of closeted people, but i would like to know that. as an historian, are you concerned? -- i am concerned as a white male about injustice for anybody who is not white over the last couple years. i am wondering that as an historian, if you have a view, are we going backwards as a society in general in terms of social justice movements? things would be helpful. thank you. host: thank you for the call. mr. stein? onst: on the first step -- the first question, quantification is very difficult. we have lots of surveys stretching back to the kinsey studies in the 19 50's. if the question is as narrowly, we tend to get reports of one to three to five to 10% of the population. the question is asked broadly, we tend to have much more broad numbers. when we think of the term queer, that is meant to represent a broader away -- a broader array of people. it represen

mr. stein, a brilliant presentation on stonewall. only had a cursory understanding before the show today, and i find this highly informative. two questions for you. one, how large is the lgbt community? how large is the demographic? i am sure the statistic is probably hard to get at, because, you know, closeted people, but i would like to know that. second, as a historian -- are you concerned that i am concerned as a white male about injustice for anybody who is not white over the last couple of years, and i'm wondering, as a historian, if you have a view -- are we going backward as a lgbtq, butt just for just in general for the social justice movement? answers to those questions would be helpful. thank you. host: thanks for the call. mr. stein? guest: on the first question, quantitation is very difficult. we have lots of surveys stretching back to the kinsey study in the 1940's and 1950's. if the question is as merrily, we could get 1% to 3% to 10% of the population, but the question is asked broadly, we start to have much larger nu

mr. stanton votes no. miss stein votes no. escobar votes no. mr. showeden votes aye. mr. g omert votes aye. mr. jordan votes yes. mr. buck? mr. buck votes aye. mr. rat cliff? aye. robe votes mr. gates votes aye. r. johnson of louisiana votes aye. .r. beggs votes aye mr. mcclintock? votes aye. klein votes aye. yes.stubbe votes gentleman from tennessee? >> no. no. r. cohen votes >> gentleman from no. >> ga from florida. >> votes no. >> gentle lady from texas? florida. sorry. florida. >> there 15ayes and 22 nos. >> point of order. results. will announce s and to two nos. >> motion to adjourn is not adopted for what purposes? >> mr. chairman point of order. >> point of order. on ordering.s >> this is not debatable. point of order is not previously. tabled. has been that is correct, mr. chairman. point of order. lying nadler motion has just tabled. house, i'm happy to make my formal.f order read the rule. >> motion to adjourn? >> we voted to table. rules of the house say it didn't measure those at the table. >> sorry. motion to table, what? when a motion, when an amendment --

mr. ben stein. hey, good to see you. >> good seeing you., do you think, so hesitant to distance themselves from this jerk, this guy that says so many horrible, horrible anti-semitic things? >> because they think he has a following in the black community, and the black community is the bedrock of the democratic party, and they tonight want to do anything to it in any way whatsoever distance themselveses from that bedrock. you have to understand, minister farrakhan is not just your order lunatic. -- ordinary lunatic. he is a dangerous, hitler-loving, violent racist, probably the most violent racist on the public scene today. he makes david duke look like benjamin netanyahu. he is a very, very dangerous guy, and the idea that cory booker would think that there's something wrong with meeting, just meeting a person who's a u.s. senator and not endorsing him and not that there's something wrong with meeting farrakhan, it's incredible. farrakhan is a person who should be kept at a distance by absolutely everyone. and, by the way, i believe there i