bruce: what is your feeling at the time of president ford's pardon of richard nixon? rep. rodino: one sunday morning i was back in new jersey with my wife at that time, who has since passed away, and i recall we had just come back from mass and my mother-in-law told me the white house had just called and the president was calling me. i immediately called back. i forget who it was i was in touch with, one of the president's assistance. they said the president did want to talk with you. the president wanted to advise you he was going to issue a pardon. as soon as i heard that, i thought to myself, my god. either president ford has lost his mind, lost his cool or maybe , richard nixon is about ready to die or something has occurred that has caused him to make this decision. i recall early on when president ford, who is a dear friend of mine, early on during a press conference, he had stated he was going to wait until the process went down the line. that there was a complete investigation. as you know, the special prosecutor, leon jaworski, still investigating at that time and

richard just proved that. ok because because they don't because i again this is where the do great divide is here i think that it was the obama administration but they were the ones that committed this these acts against the law and against carter page and george papadopoulos they're never mentioned ok their people their lives have been destroyed other people's lives have been destroyed through process crimes ok not even having to do with any of this here and so it seems to me this is a power play i wish people would be more honest about it go ahead david. well that's the nature of d.c. it's all about dishonesty it's all about political theater performance are it's pro wrestling gets the best way to learn about d.c. of the talking points coming out of it but look you know mansi palosi and donald trump are closer politically than i am to either of them ok so i don't have a dog in that fight but i see what's clearly in front of us and the democrats you're right there are scapegoating they're projecting their own

it richard jewel was painted with a very unfair brush stroke or 2 or 3. and because of that people never acknowledged his humanity this film is a man of music yes woods taught tale of a miscarriage of justice feels all too perfect and is certain to provoke discussion and debate long after the final real. bomb and soon to new york pork you have 30 minutes. with me now is the author of that report. a man who was happy the world premiere along with a lot of other journalists in los angeles scott wrote so scott what was it like to feel so basic i mean just to be in the presence of a clint eastwood of course he's a living legend as you mentioned 89 not slowing down i mean this is his his 3rd film in 2 years it's incredible and i think it's probably his best film since probably american sniper what i always love about clint eastwood is what a clear structured sense he has to his his films is always very clear what he wants to show what he wants to tell i mean i think while the best parts of this movie are when he takes the f.b.i.'s key. against richard jewel an

clint eastwood's latest movie richard jewel hits a. corner of a trial of one of the in the film script we don't read on this story. age old wood carving craft. that's being given a. canadian author and activist. books that criticize capitalism and globalization whether you agree with her views or not she has strong intelligent. she's on a book tour promoting her latest home which is called. the burning case for a green new deal which is advocating a new green contract to save the planet. and viral mental activists naomi klein points of a total collapse she says politicians are too afraid to take drastic measures out of ignorance and fear of losing at the polls. and big energy companies spend a lot of money on kind of paints and to convincing us that the market will fix everything. we have an economic system. that defines success as and less economic growth and much of that growth is is connected to an ideology of endless consumption and that is incompatible with what our planet can take and so we need a different economic paradigm for

back richard crazy. rather crazy. he's. not wrong to his quick thinking saves hundreds of lives but the media thinks richard jewel looks more like a dangerous loner fits the profile of the lone bomber a frustrated white man who is a police want to be who seeks to become a hero lead. to 32 cars. yet be i to try to pin the crowd one joule. cut. is very important. they catch somebody so they just got somebody new just grabs richard drew. clint eastwood's portrait of an ordinary american hero is brought to life by actor paul waterhouse or in a role he was born to play. we're trying to argue what a man who is convicted in the press before the age of social media the script we don't read on this story what are we doing here ok we're writing it turned into until the end jewel believes in the system and they took my baby. my disney movie. they did it because they want to see if we mount a record of. a political statement or so. i do you keep defending these people. just explain. it richard jewel was painted with a very unfair brush

you know richard it may be. i think the good people of good faith can look at facts and come to different conclusions and i think that's the essence of having an honest political conversation but let's reflect upon what anthony just said there they just don't like the guy and they want him out and they feel that they were cheated in 2016 and this is a grudge match and it's easy to. trump's temperament as president and oh he's a he is a unique quantity here i'm trying to be neutral but i mean this is a power play richard that's all it is isn't it go ahead and look you know after charlottesville when with so divisive and so welcoming about american nazis in some people's minds no indication to proceed with impeachment when it went on when he when he took babies from mother's arms across the border people thought that might have been but nancy pelosi said sorry no even after all or but obama did on obama and did that that was it obama was yeah. yeah great so but here is that here to the thing i'm glad you mentioned

see his latest is richard jewel the true story of a terrible miscarriage of justice richard jewel was a security guard who discovered a bomb lympics back in 1906 having raised the alarm and saved lives he was later accused of planting the bomb. when he finds suspicious package at centennial park richard jewel plays the hero out of enough so count to 3 and to push it back further richard crazy. rather crazy that. he's not wrong to his quick thinking saves hundreds of lives but the media thinks richard jewel looks more like a dangerous loner fits the profile of the lone bomber a frustrated white man who is a police want to be who seeks to become a hero. bomber to 30 to go. to. the f.b.i. to try to pin the crime one joule. is very important. they catch somebody so they just got somebody new just grabs richard drew. clint eastwood's portrait of an ordinary american hero is brought to life by actor paul walter hauser in a role he was born to play. we're trying to argue what a man who is convicted in the press before the age of social media the script we don't read on this story what are we

what is your feeling at the time of president ford's pardon of richard nixon. one sunday morning i was back in new jersey with my wife at that time, who has since mysed away, and mother-in-law told me the white house is just called. to be one of the -- the president did want to talk with you. the president wanted to advise you he was going to issue a pardon. as soon as i heard that, i thought to myself, my god. prison for his lost his mind or lost his cool or maybe richard nixon is about ready to die or something has occurred that has caused him to make this decision. that president ford, who is a dear friend of mine, earlier on he had stated he would were -- he would wait until the process went down the line. there was this complete investigation -- as you know, the special prosecutor, leon jaworski, still investigating at that time and i thought that was what he was going to do. he was asked whether he would issue a pardon and he stated he knew it was within his absolute power to do so, but he was going to wait, and i interpreted that to mean he would wait fo

guys hang on richard go ahead go ahead richard. so i'm glad you mentioned the federalist papers goes read alexander hamilton in federalist paper 65 where there he talks about the abuse of power which far supersedes anything having to do with a high crime in this to meter certainly it is when he talks about there which is using the office to your personal political advantage almost literally matches up with what trump did here and as i said earlier if that you were not on the discussion if if trump would have put the arm on say the head of israel to say we got you through $3000000000.00 in aid annually but to me this favor or to she and china we've got a good trade deal for you but to me this favor that's exactly. right again richard we're coming and going in a cul de sac here i mean again all of us have read the transcript and i come to a very different conclusion ok and i actually know a lot about ukraine i'm just of iran so no i don't know but you know the let me go to hang on or no no no no that was really good everybody and i g

my name is richard jewell. >> when i hear the name richard jewell, i think human tragedy. >> reporter: the world first came to know richard jewell as the heroic security guard who saved countless lives during the 1996 bombing at the atlanta summer olympics. >> i spotted the bag laying on the ground under the beverage. bench. >> overnight, it changed. and suddenly, the rush to judgment began. >> where were you at 1:00 on that morning. >> did you do it? >> no, sir, i didn't do this. >> they needed a fall guy, and they took richard. >> move away -- >> you can always look at the guy who found the bomb just like you can always look at the guy who found the body. >> reporter: now 23 years after richard's life was upended, his story is getting the hollywood treatment. >> he had a good ticker. >> reporter: his vigilance was turned against him. for the first time we take you inside the fbi's investigation of jewell, with footage never before seen by the public. >> it's my understanding you're a hero. >> summer of 1996 atlanta, it was festive. the city was excited. >> everybody in town was fire

they catch somebody so they just got somebody new just grabs richard drew. clint eastwood's portrait of an ordinary american hero is brought to life by actor paul walter hauser in a role he was born to play. we're trying to argue what a man who is convicted in the press before the age of social media scripts we don't lead on this story what are we doing here ok we're running it turned into until the end jewel believes in the system and they took my babies my disney movie. they did it because i want to see if we mount a record of. a political statement or so. i do you keep defending these people. under siege playing well so be it richard jewel was painted with a very unfair brush stroke or 2 or 3. and because of that people never acknowledged his humanity this film is a man music yes woods taught tale of a miscarriage of justice feels all too perfect and is certain to provoke discussion and debate long after the fun real. bomb and soon to new york pork you have 30 minutes. with me now is the author of that report and a man who was at the world premiere along

that's richard thompson. these are a couple of color vaultmans that are interesting in comparison to the pure crosshatch ones. these are water color images. these were done in the 1970s. richard thompson's style is just -- as a cartoonist, and i look at this, and it's a beautiful combination of loose line. he was influenced a lot by some of the great english cartoonists, but he took it to his own sort of place. is i s an inspire to this kind of looseness. this is one i did for "politico." this is a caricature of bernie sanders. richard's approach was a classic sort of dip pen. he works in a style that would have fit in perfectly in the 19th century in some ways but is also very, very modern. this is an another richard thompson. you can see the difference in that i rely on lots of little lines, little black and white lines that harken back to the wooden graving of the thomas nast era. you can see the rendering is done in water color and he sees the paint render the shapes and here's the paul ryan that i did fo

you have to remember that richard nixon did resign. he resigned because he recognized that the committee on the judiciary had issued these ificles of impeachment and the people will remember and scholars do know that in the report, all the members of the judiciary committee, the report was unanimous in that richard nixon had obstructed justice. this is a violation of the criminal code and all the republicans had joined in writing this report, which was a pretty severe indictment of richard nixon. i felt that that would have been strong enough, a strong enough indictment, that presented to a might have found that richard nixon was indeed guilty of those offenses and found him guilty. and i think that whereas history makes you wonder, was he guilty, and the president, president of symptom continued to say, as he continues to say, that all ,eated was to make a mistake and no one can say that he had violated the law as such, but he did nonetheless resign from office under that terrible cloud. so i think the question of the scenario, what i

-richard: i know! lemonis: so, this is it? richard: so, this is it. what do you think?emonis: it's interesting to see how different it looks. this place last time was a war zone. this is our biggest makeover to date -- an 11,000-square-foot facility and a state-of-the-art ice-cream factory. with all this new equipment, i'm excited to see how it works. so, what does this do? michael: this is a pint filler. this takes a pint, drops it into the carousel, fills it with ice cream, heat-seals it, date-codes it, and ejects it out the other end. lemonis: what does a machine like this cost? michael: this is about $150,000. lemonis: just for this little thing? -michael: yes. -lemonis: $150,000? michael: you'll make it up in waste. lemonis: well, aren't you in charge anymore? can i see the process? -michael: we can, yeah. -lemonis: let's do it. [ machine whirs ] this machine is our future, and it can fill up to 4,000 pints per hour. we get $2.50 for every pint that we sell. that means we can generate up to $10,000 an hour, or $80,000 in an eight-hour day. -come on, lori! -lori: we

commissioner richards? >> commissioner richards: so i just have to hand it again to mr. kevlin and mr. sia. they make a great team. this is the second or third time you've come together, and you always produce something for the neighborhood. i hope to see you together over and over. i'm proud to be a member of dt&a because we support housing. we worked on the market and on octavia plan. this was one those that was a bank -- i don't know if it was bank of the west or whatever, but finally, this gets to be repaired back to what it should be. housing was knocked down to make this, and now we're getting back to housing. i just have two questions. first, i see on page 8-4.1, i see the parapet. however, as i look on 8-3.1 and 8-0.1, the plans call for a base, a middle, and a top. that doesn't look like much of a base here. >> yeah. brad terell, sia consulting. we looked at that, and one of the things that came back to us was why don't we just do it simpler, so we just developed an aesthetic that was a foreground element. so the base -- drag this with me over here. here, you se

>> richard: it's all fair in love and war.t should comply, i think that's a different context from the white house. rudy giuliani refused to comply with a congressionally issued subpoena. the reason i think that's important is it doesn't matter who is in power, the idea that congress has the power to issue a subpoena, americans abide by duly issued subpoenas. >> capri: i agree with both of these guys, it's imperative, and i think first of all the way joe biden handled this was another error coming out of the joe biden campaign where i think he should have just come out of the gate saying he was going to comply. because democrats time and again have criticized the trump administration for basically holding these witnesses back, saying we need more information. you can't call for more information on one side and with holden on other so i'm a huge fan of equity and i think it's important for us to be able to practice what we preach and i think joe biden is now on the right side here by saying he would comply. speeches and people

>> it's here. >> commissioner richards: it's black? >> yes. and the box bays project and interrupt that. so we have a standard height where parapets are normally high, in this case, we're trying to control that in such a way that it keeps it simple, but something that's not trying too hard to overwhelm the street. it's certainly something we could dial in further if need be in conditioning with staff and the like. >> commissioner richards: i'd actually like to see it a little bit higher. >> well, we had a discussion -- >> commissioner richards: i have had involved in that. when i was talking on the phone with mr. kemler, when you see it on paper, it looks like a pencil mustache drawn on a big fat man. >> we tried to keep a relationship between those parts in a way in which one is seco secondary and one is higher. this is the image submitted to you back in may. >> commissioner richards: so the image -- okay. right. >> you recall -- yeah. that is t that was the flying parapet. that was distinct in such a way that it was trying to develop a littl

then richard thompson, a laura bush. then this lovely sophisticates, the painting of richard is sort of annoying and wonderful. up in the corner. that is our trump that kevin draws for the economist. he did it recently with the twitter bird on his shoulder. a fabulous piece of color art. >> in the bar, 75% of the art on the walls are really straight caricatures. there are a number of real >> political cartoons here. this one has one by me and one for kevin callaher. you can tell the difference in that we have word bubbles and captions. there is a lot more information and opinion being conveyed in these, which is what we are really about. kevin's is a lovely example of good political cartoon, built around a clever visual metaphor that is conveyed quickly. in this case it is the boxing ring, and it is israel and policy stein going at it. and the new ref is obama. then you see round number. and the old refs, busch bush, clinton, reagan, albeit up. >> it is a food example and if you are doing a good political cartoon, you ca

by the time you get to richard pryor, richard pryor decides he's not going to speak in code. way black people talk in private. >> police got a chokehold they use out here. they choke -- to death. that mean you be dead when they're through. you know that? we're going, yeah, we know. white folks are going, no, i had no idea. yeah, two grab your legs, one grab your head. snap. oh, [ bleep ], broke it. >> what it does is give people who have never had a way to talk about their struggle, because you can quote a richard pryor joke. then it gives people who never thought about the black struggle a way to hear about it through humor. richard pryor is delivering it in a way that's funny so you go, ha, ha, ha, huh. i wonder if that's true. all of a sudden your imagination is cracked open a little bit because he's explaining his experience. he's not just going, white people are bad, white people are bad. he's explaining the experience. and that, to me, is the difference. >> after you saw live in concert or sunset strip you went back and thought, i need to change what i do. >> we do all

it went after commissioner richards.hey knew he was an investor in a real estate project by six dogs l.l.c. a project that had been completed and was being marketed for sale will. so they revoked all the permits for that project. here this behavior is likely will his homeowners, contractors , engineers to put up with d.b.i.'s unlawful favouritism for years. but this time, d.b.i. went too far after the wrong target. in one sense, issue before you today is simple. did d.b.i. overstep its bounds by revoking the permit permits in a completed project based on most minor discrepancy between the work that was done in the work that we showed at the outset of the project? as i'm sure you probably know from past experience, these types of discrepancies are dealt with routinely time and time again in a revision permit at the end of a project to have the plans reflect what actually was built. as we demonstrated in our briefs and exhibits, permit revocation is extraordinarily rare. happening only a few times per year, only one or two

we will keep a close eye on sir richard that expects a richard branson., the owner of peugeot and fiat chrysler, in separate meetings on tuesday, approved a binding agreement for a $50 billion merger, according to unnamned sources .a formal announcement of the merger, which would create the world's fourth largest car maker is expected later on wednesday. a nearly $731 million tax break helped anglo—dutch oil major shell avoid a coprorate income tax bill in the uk last year, the financial times reports. the newspaper said such write—offs could continue for years. the tax break is used to defray the costs of dismantling oil and gas rigs in the north sea. shell's chief financial officer said the company complies with the applicable tax laws "in all the countries and locations in which we have a taxable presence. " the british pound has now shed all the gains it made —— that's it for the business briefing this hour. chemotherapy drugs could become more effective and have fewer side effects, according to doctors at a hospital in surrey. although the trial at t

the interview was from the richard nixon presidential collection. history was -- wrought him odham was ad io -- of yale. >> what did you expect to be doing in 1974? the expected to work for children's defense fund. after myerned for her first year, maybe. work with her,to and moved to cambridge began working, doing investigations and litigation around issues like the incarceration of juveniles with orlt's in adult prisons efforts to give tax exempt status to private segregated academies so they didn't have to pay taxes. expanding childcare, getting better conditions for migrant workers, that is the kind of work we were doing and that's what i started doing when i went right to cambridge to work for her. call.l us about the >> this is a funny series of actions. i was visiting bill in arkansas i think right after christmas, either right before or after. rang and he got a call from john doerr. , "i have been asked to put together a team of lawyers for the house judiciary committee to investigate whether there are grounds for impeachment of president ni

richard jewell. bob costas joins me now. why had richard jewell come to see you one year later?ou recall, as some others may and as the movie lays out, at the time the fbi felt that richard jewell fit the profile of someone who might have been the bomber. that was reported by much of the media. they were not necessarily taking the initiative to indict richard jewell, they were reporting what the fbi was putting out there. and it turns out that he was completely innocent. that he was a hero. there was a fatality, there were hundreds of injuries, but it would have been worse without his action. but since this took place during the olympics, with the entire country and much of the world watching, this wasn't an isolated thing that happened somewhere outside the spotlight, this was a big deal. much of the country assumed that richard jewell was the bomber. his reputation was harmed forever. there are still people who when you mention richard jewell's name, they don't make the distinction. he's the guy, the bombing in atlanta. while all this was going on, i raised -- i didn't think i

of what happened with richard kleindienst and the president. the details about the payment of hush money. all the details about other aspects of the obstruction. so this was a huge studying process and the committee was very -- staff and rodino were very clever about how they got us to absorb this material because they didn't trust us to do our homework on our own. what they did was staff prepared big black books called statements of evidence, and they'd have a statement of evidence and then they'd have all the backup for it in that book. and these books had to be locked in our safes at night. they could not be -- you couldn't give them to anybody. they were top secret. and in fact, none of this stuff leaked, which is pretty amazing. and we would have these statements of evidence read to us. rodino had -- these were all secret proceedings. the public was not allowed in. the press was not allowed in. it was an opportunity for the members to take the statement of evidence and give it right back to the staff if they disagreed. well, how do you kno

so a fact would be, richard millhouse nixon was born on -- and in pennsylvania. and he would say no, those are two facts. apparently in john's practice he would use cards to find patterns and if he didn't have enough of the facts, he couldn't deduce the patterns. so we learned -- i mean, that's why we had these little cards and they attempted, as i recall, some method in the library to organize and sort them. but, you know, really computers were not in common use and i think john preferred his system anyway. so we spent a lot of time doing these cards and looking for anything that could be a piece of information that might go into the presentation we would make to the committee. timothy: is it true they used knitting needles to sort the cards? sec. clinton: i think that was a short-lived experiment. i don't remember because i wasn't really doing it. but, yeah, you took the fact, which was predominantly handwritten, at least the ones i did were handwritten, then it was like transferred on to a punch card and then the punch cards had certain holes in them and the i

we caught up with sir richard.last two years and we need to find out whether the new government would like us to do it. if they want us to do it, it can be funded privately, it won't need any government money and we would love to get on and do it. if not, delhi have said they wa nt it. if not, delhi have said they want us to do it there and there are many other cities in india who said they would love to see it happen. 0ur number one priority is to try to get it done between mum by and punai. -- get it done between mum by and punai. —— mumbai. governments have a job to question previous governments' positions and make their decisions based on the current fa ct, their decisions based on the current fact, that i, i think there was some misreporting about us needing money from the government which would have understandably put off governments. we don't need money from the government and therefore it is likely will be knocking on an open door. what you think of the aviation sector? how much potential do you have over h

nixon's california, he was just an unimaginable defection from richard nixon's camp. wiggins was the strongest and most outspoken and most compelling supporter of nixon on the judiciary committee. right, congressman wiggins voted no on all five of the impeachment articles that they considered against nixon. he led the nixon camp in the judiciary committee. he led the republican resistance to the impeachment. but even he when faced with this new incontrovertible evidence he decided he too must go. wiggins wasn't like in leadership or something. he wasn't speaker of the house or something. but i mean talk about a day in which you want to buy the paper, right? this was august 6, 1974, you see the banner headline there. nixon admits order to halt inquiry on watergate 6 days after break in. expects impeachment, support ebbs. and the verbatim copy of nixon's statement about the disclosure of the tapes. but then also there above the fold, i mean next to the picture of the democratic leader tip o'neil, there's this back bench california congressman charles wiggins with his in

there was richard and a good friend of richards, sacks b chandler's, former senator from georgia. we became good friends and we didn't agree on everything but i think at the end of the day, the secret sauce that is missing from too much of our politics is eighth trust and that trust means that sometimes you have to be willing to do what you think is right, even if your team doesn't agree with it and until you can show your willingness to stand up for something you believe in, and front frankly your team doesn't agree with, you don't fully earn that trust and i think richard and i have hand tried to earn that with each other. we gave each other plenty of grief along the way, we travel, we have traveled on some of these times around the world. but it starts with a personal relationship and a recognition that the friendship and and relationship is more important than short term partisan points. >> he doesn't know what it's like to subpoena the president's son. but he did turn to me and say, you are going to do what? and the fact is that doing things like that, is not something you ex

that wraps it up for me this hour, i'm richard lui.stagram, and facebook. coming up, "politicsnation." referendum al sharpton will speak with a potential senate trial juror, ben cardin of maryland. of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7 and maintained it. oh! under 7? (announcer) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (announcer) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medi

hehe now calls himself richard, rick.'m sorry, i call him i in particular, because he was trying to use me to get rid of rick, and i thought rick was a really good lawyer and good partner. not to say rick and i did not have fights, we did. the biggest was over who is going to question rosemary woods. it wasn't always over who would question rosemary woods, i thought he was hogging the witnesses and i was taking the next witness and it turned out to be rosemary woods. that turned out to be a lucky break for me. that is what i remember about leon. host: since you brought up adminry woods, the agent becomes a very important challenge of yours. tell us what you remember of that case, of how it came to you, and of deposing -- i guess you deposed in mos rosemary woo. ms. wine-banks: it was not really a deposition, it was an official hearing in front of a judge. normally a deposition would be in your lawyer's office. there are not really depositions in a criminal case, they are in civil cases. this is one of those created methods

richard nixon in 1974. theinterview is from richard nixon presidential library oral history collection, and was conducted by former library director timothy naphtali in july 2018. when she was hired by the lead special council on the judiciary committee. >> when you graduate in 1973, what did you expect to be doing in 1974? >> i expected to work for the children's defense fund. i had interned for her after y first year, maybe. i wanted to go to work with her, so i moved to cambridge and began working, doing investigations and litigation around issues like the incarceration of juveniles with adult's in adult prisons or efforts to give tax exempt status to private segregated academies so they didn't have to pay taxes. issues like that. expanding childcare, getting better conditions for migrant workers, that is the kind of work we were doing and that's what i started doing when i graduated and went right to cambridge to work for her. >> tell us about the call. >> this is a funny series of actions. i was visiti

>> there were some good ones about richard burton and him, richard burton was trying to get to the pubwere on this motorcycle and the passenger seat and he was in the passenger seat, richard burton was drive, clint was like, maybe i better drive. >> jimmy: yeah. one of them is still around. >> exactly. exactly. he's very healthy. but there was a lot of good stuff. there's a scene in the movie where we have all these guns on the bed. and there was one that appeared to be a .44 magnum or .357 magnum or something, so paul and i are there alone with clint this this bedroom, he grabs the gun and powerful gun in the world." paul and i looked at each like did that just happen? that's like worth the whole experience, and he was setting himself up a little bit, he has a sense of humor. >> jimmy: i love that, when guys like him, these iconic guys. you've worked with a lot of these guys, will give you that stuff. because you know that, you know they do it every once in a while, and it's kind of a loving thing to do. i think it's a way of him telling you he likes you, i assume he like you, you get

but the richard nixon that they supported through the years was not the richard nixon that they thoughthey knew. >> every generation has to lose their virginity, and it was just the day that my generation did. but to think that we're the only generation that had that experience is probably the mistake that a lot of generations make. >> he is already before the cameras now. president richard milhous nixon, 37th president of the united states. >> throughout the long and difficult period of watergate i have felt it was my duty to persevere. >> watergate doesn't go away because it was so extraordinary, it was so hidden. >> we act like it can't happen again. and it did a lot of stuff after. there was a lot of hoo-haing and passing laws, giving speeches. but if you ask me do i think we learned anything from it, no. >> i have never been a quitter. to leave office before my term is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body. but as president i must put the interests of america first. >> the president had been driven from office because the american people had learned the truth about ri

where richard white says and victor didn't spell out the trumpet ministration there but i suspect he had that in mind when he said no world leader should take it as a walk in the woods when it comes to negotiating the deal you cry zation of north korea is there a sense do you think richard or is it justified to have a sense that perhaps the trumpet administration underestimated the task. i wouldn't say that i mean the people who have been presenting the administration's logic have said well you know it's we there's no good solution here with we launch a military strike we couldn't happen a war if we do nothing war end up with at least north korea with nuclear weapons perhaps japan south korea and other countries we can rely on sanctions and that i would add that has actually been one success of the administration's policy the sanctions have increased and including those imposed by china and russia the one unusual step president trump took which was against the recommendation of the many think tank people don't let yourselves on the front do you mind interrupt you too richard but how

richard joins us now in sydney. richard, all those rate decisions, is the global easing cycle done?global growth, we can forget about them now? richard: we might get a couple more but in broad terms, it is done. 2019 was an incredible period. certainly the largest since the financial crisis in terms of easing and i think central banks increasingly now are less target focused and more momentum focused because a lot of them are away from their targets. as soon as things start to get better and they have limited ammunition, they tend to pull back and hold and i think that is what we have started to see. shery: one of the thing -- paul: one of the things the central banks in developed markets are looking for -- we had a slightly positive read in japan today. are we really seeing inflation? are we just confined to unique factors around food prices, for example? richard: largely confined to unique factors around food samples. can have an enormous impact across the region and that is what we are seeing and we are seeing it in australia and new zealand in food prices and in india that will

. >> the new clint eastwood movie, "richard jewell," coming under fire for how it portrays a crucial character. the star actress now speaking out. >>> breaking overnight, a giant in the professional sports world who transformed the nba suffers a serious medical emergency. >>> caffeine craze. forget coffee or soda. the new drink hitting the market with twice the caffeine. >>> and trump versus greta. the president takes to twitter to mock the 16-year-old climate activist saying she has issues and needs to chill. this morning how the teen is responding. >>> good friday morning, everyone. friday the 13th, and we begin with the final vote on the articles of impeachment against president trump. >> the vote by the house committee is expected this morning after a last-second delay by democrats overnight. the delay followed 14 hours of bitter debate. >>> meanwhile, there's new information about what the expected trial of president trump will look like. abc's serena marshall has been on the story all night long. serena, good morning. >> reporter: kenneth, janai, good morning to both of you. wh

but richard nixon had done that and we found out about it one day. so the question became, well, we can settle this. who's telling the truth. let's go to the tape. it was of course a matter of time i think, before, assuming nixon didn't burn the tapes, which some thought he should do at the time, and others thought he should have done, looking back on it. what an extraordinary thing that this would become evidence in a criminal case and then known to the public and now available for our ears. >> well, let's say goodbye to richard nixon for the duration of this time and turn his successor, his appointed vice president. we've skipped over spiro ago knew and the circumstances of his resignation and the coming of the 25th amendment which for the first time provided for the appointment of a new vice president when the vice presidency became vacant and it turned out to be jerld ford who was the republican minority leader in the house of representatives, had been an established figure in washington for a quarter of a century. and i wonder, as you look at th

let's say goodbye to richard nixon and turned to his successor, his appointed vice president.we have skipped over spiro agnew and the circumstances of his resignation in the coming of the 20 for the amendment which for the first time provided for the appointment of a new vice president when the vice presidency became vacant. and it turned out to be gerald ford, who the time was the republican minority leader in the house of representatives, had been an established figure in washington for 25 years and i wonder, as you look >> at these, was ford nixon's first choice to be his vice president? what did he hope he would accomplish by appointing ford to the office instead of someone else? >> ford was easy to get appointed. i know that nixon really wanted john connelly, a democrat who was closely associated with lyndon johnson and very conservative and had joined nixon as his treasury secretary in his first term and then ran democrats for nixon. but apparently there was no way to get a democratic turncoat. were there other candidates? ford was just the easiest to get appointed. nixo

richard what do you make of that attempting to blackmail north korea is doomed perhaps the u.s. and its allies should be focusing on arms control measures right i would actually use the blackmail term with regard to north korea i think that's what the purpose of all these threats and offense of hints of authentic action are that you know unless you relax the sanctions and make other concessions we're going to go ahead and make these tests that aside i disagree that the answer is we're never going to seen north career denuclearized so i can see scenarios on what you what are current there was some hope that with the new north korean leader clearly very concerned about the health of the economy to break out of isolation more distant from china and then the past that there may be openings with him to consider some kind of grand bargain in which north korea you can have those homeowners those who have earned their return for economic. not presently but you know who knows maybe he'll this this war will change in the future i mean there is a widening clear solution what i think will b

it's called "richard jewell".ting a bomb at the olympics in atlanta. it was, and, you know, it's a sad, it is a sad story, for sure. >> it's heavy, you know. it's one of those movies that, it's sort of like you have to google it afterwards because some of the things seem so unbelievable. and then you find out they're real, but it's pretty jaw-dropping. >> jimmy: by the way, speaking of it being real, i mentioned this to sam rockwell when he was here. i was there, in, i was working in a radio station, i was in the parking lot. >> oh, seriously. >> jimmy: at richard jewell's apartment complex. >> what? >> jimmy: with the media depicted in the film. and it is exactly as i remembered it. i mean exactly as i remembered it, and it's a very strange experience to see that. it's almost watching like a home movie or something, but i happened to be there covering the olympics. i was a sports guy on the radio station. and this happened. it became the big story, and we were out in the parking lot just waiti waiting for somethi