in fact, when bill barr is a name was first revealed when the trans caput brought to let the justice department immediately sent we have nothing to do this. we have nothing to do with this. hear this particular domestic political errand was being done by the president's personal lawyer. i wanted to just follow also while i can, senator, on mixed motives. if you conclude the president acted with mixed motives, some of them corrupt and forbidden, some of them legitimate, you should vote to convict. that principle is deeply rooted in our legal tradition. it is commonplace in civil and criminal law going back centuries. for example, in describing the standard for corrupt motive of abstraction, the seventh circuit rejected any requirement that a defendants wholly or even main purpose was to obstruct the administration of justice. instead the court explained a defendant is guilty if his mood is included in the corrupt forbidden goals here that case united states versus quinton which i cited earlier is not only relevant here but that case was argued by professor dershowitz and he lost. he m