caroline: is it time up for big tech?n one hand, we see the starting of this rotation away from growth stocks. they were the favorites during the first wave of the pandemic. now, the nasdaq slipping, posting the worst two days in months. adding to that, tech regulation is tightening across the globe from china to the eu and here in the united states. just today, we learned that amazon faces an antitrust complaint in europe. big tech faces a new administration in the united states. this time around, joe biden seems to have a different attitude to the last time he was in the white house. the rotation, we are seeing that from the center of the market. joe: if you look at one of the hottest areas with tech, it is some of those cloud computing names, very rate sensitive because so much of their earnings are backloaded. up until now, one of the hottest etf's all year, down over the last three days. really, over the last two days, with the vaccine, with the rates moving up, people not willing to pay as much. caroline: the s&p 50

it is essentially, it is a subsidy to big tech. t over 20 years ago was because congress believes at the time tech would be neutral, would be a public forum, essentially a fair marketplace of ideas. big tech isn't pretending to do that anymore. now they're openly sense suffering. they shouldn't get -- censoring shouldn't get special. big tech is larger, has more market caps than at&t was when it was broken up under the antitrust laws. it is bigger and more powerful than standard oil was broken up under the antitrust laws. that includes the ftc using section 5 authority for deceptive conduct. the third avenue is, is focusing directly on consumer deception and breaking the promise to consumers. stated very simply when you sign up for social media the promise they make to you if you follow someone you're going to see what they have to say. if someone follows you they're going to see what you have to say. big tech is breaking that promise every day. they don't like your views, they silence you, they shadow ban you and i think we ought t

big tech. look at the stock prices with massive surges. e power of the executive branch could align with the tech monopolies. what will happen? the people who have more data on you know that you have about yourself can shut everything down. the night before election night. we opened our show with an argument for why donald trump's campaign mattered to descent people. many viewed that monologue on the internet and facebook censored it saying it contained partly false information. they did a fact check from a partisan organization and it was "mostly false for us to say elite in washington ignored the opioid epidemic." in other words, politicians in washington eventually after a decade threw a big number at a problem. it did not solve it. if you claim otherwise, we will silence you. data guys with partisan agendas have power over what we say and what we think. we should not be surprised because it's not just here. everywhere. we have given fake experts with no knowledge of anything with agendas they hide control over climate change and the hou

like 30 and power of big tech just. in search of victory president donald trump and his rival joe biden make their final push in crucial swing states ahead of tuesday's u.s. election. alone convert al this is al jazeera live from doha also coming up. at least 2 people killed in a super typhoon gone it hits the philippines with winds of up to 280 kilometers per hour. another lock down for england this.

bigger than big tech. >> big tech take over, facebook reportedly changing its own rhythm to promoteoutlets and drop visibility to what they call hyper-partisan pages. griff: do americans want silicon valley to choose what they read? joining us from the internet subcommittee senator marsha blackburn, thanks for joining us. >> the american people want that power themselves. they do not want big tech to filter what they are able to see or hear or read and then have big tech pressure on what they think or how they vote which is what happened in 2020 and this is why we are working diligently to section 230. my legislation is moving forward in the judiciary committee. our online privacy bill is moving forward with bipartisan support in the commerce committee. jillian: feel like we have been spinning in this circle for years with this conversation of censorship and nothing is changing and a lot of americans are getting frustrated by it. what is your biggest frustration and concern? >> it was in 2012 i started on the issue of online privacy, trying to make the online consumer of virtual use

that's why big tech is often running big-time this morning.se, they are also a source of safety with growth in the future, a ton of money in the bank so there's a flight to safety in uncertain times right to big tech. that's what's happening right now, sandra. >> that's fascinating because we saw this huge selloff in october; right stuart? and in recent days we seen the rally and everyone was trying to understand where wall street stood on prediction for this race , and here we are this morning the morning after election day and we still have yet to call several of these major battleground states, stuart. so, as we work our way through the day, through the week, could we see wall street trying to predict one way or the other whether it's trump or biden or have they decided? stuart: i don't think wall street has decided and we just reported a reversal in the betting markets. if you could put your own money on the mind, you can bet on who you think will win risking your own a money so them that has me but we have a reversal i would say about thr

you have a great piece talking about what a biden administration would mean for big tech. p, they faced antitrust scrutiny, a lot of angry tweets. but under joe biden, it will not necessarily be smooth sailing, is it? rebecca: no, not necessarily. we saw a big report out from representative david cicilline, a 450-page antitrust report going after big tech companies -- apple, google, facebook. they are recommending some legislative reforms, likely to come out later this year and then early next year. cicilline has been quoted, saying he thinks biden will be receptive to these reforms. potentially breaking up some of these massive tech companies. that is something that came under trump's doj and may likely continue under a biden administration. emily: let's talk a little bit about section 230, because obviously, we know that president trump has a talk the law but biden has as well. where does biden stand on the power of companies like facebook and twitter to moderate their platform? rebecca: yeah, biden and trump have both called for repealing section 230 of the decency act w

robert epstein, prominent psychologist and professor who predicted that big tech would manipulate millionss year. and su saying now outright democrats were favored by bug tech. professor -- big tech. professor, good to have you with us. how is it that we could, despite your with warnings to congress very clearly, very cogently, that big tech has manipulated the vote before in 2016, you expressed your belief that they would do so again. how is it that we can be warned by authorities like you and simply you are ignored? >> it's very simple, unfortunately, and that's because democrats -- and i lean left myself -- democrats benefit from this. so it's hard to find a democrat anywhere that will challenge the power, the almost obscene power that big tech is using to manipulate votes and opinions sum blue because they -- simply because they benefit. they get most of the donations coming from these big companies. 96% of donations from google, for example, go to democrats. and they also get the ability that these companies have to shift millions of votes without people knowing and without leaving a

robert epstein, prominent psychologist and professor who predicted that big tech would manipulate millionshis year. and su saying now outright democrats were favored by bug tech. professor -- big tech. professor, good to have you with us. how is it that we could, despite your with warnings to congress very clearly, very cogently, that big tech has manipulated the vote before in 2016, you expressed your belief that they would do so again. how is it that we can be warned by authorities like you and simply you are ignored? >> it's very simple, unfortunately, and that's because democrats -- and i lean ftftftyself ----rats ben bef bef omfrhis. so it'sard t f aocrat herere t will will challengehalt po wewer, tr, almostostceneneneow ig b b bsh isingsi to latelatela vesotes opis mee bec bec by --yyyy usehe benefit. th geyet most oft ofof t donat o ng from tmsemm big compani ces s 96% o o oonations f ge, for efor exa,xa g go goocrats. and they they tlsls get the abii ohathesehe cesav to leavlein a a p trail.hout and tt, qui qte sim sply, i w w i'ven ignored. lou: well, it's a shame because not even

reliance on big tech platforms and companies more than ever as we sit out this pandemic.e see hands out not just by republicans, but democratic administration's come as you will have covered on democracy now! to big tech companies as it somehow we're just giving the a blank check without any governance or oversight or real accountability to just basically technology eyes are future in whatever ways they choose to do so. amy: this is a conversation that we will continue at a future point. professor ramesh srinivasan teaches information studies at the university of california los angeles, ucla, where he also directs the digital cultures lab. he is author of the book "beyond the valley: how innovators around the world are overcoming inequality and creating the technologies of tomorrow." when we come back, as millions of americans plunge into pandemic poverty, the senate has adjourned before passing another stimulus bill. stay with us. ♪ [music break] amy: "capitalist blues" by leyla mccalla. this is democracy now! i'm amy goodman with nermeen shaikh. we turn now to look at g

why was the monologue censored and what role did big tech plate and getting joe biden elected? or deleted big tax battles, race the truck movement and still the election. he joins us tonight. thank you fo so much for coming. we are hoping that joe biden will not become the president. if he does, you will have the alliance that's going to have consequences for the country, you know? >> we certainly well. i've been covering the tech giants and what they've been doing over the past four years. let me rephrase that. it's not what they have been doing over the past four years, it's what political elites have allowed them to do in the past four years. all the institutions that are meant to defend the public interest is sat onon their hands and watched as the big tech oligarchs developed the most powerful censorship machine for controlling and manipulating information. in swing elections that we have ever seen. if we are now living with the consequence is buried everyone who was saying it's the role of the defend the market populace from the dash you say about an administration that's

they're concerned about their thoughts just being shut out entirely by the democrats in big tech whore working together to suppress knowledge that every american should know before voting for president. they see all of it jesse it is getting out there and they're getting sick of it. jesse: so when you have big tech aligned with the democratic aligned with media and they do these poll where is they oversample, and they sensor and they boycott and they run all sorts of misinformation does that make you guys feel like the underdog you're the incumbent but in a way -- your father is like the underdog when you see all of these powerful interest align against them. >> oh. 100% we're underdog think about it mean stream media a multibillion dollar organization spotting their entire weight behind the democrats. social media, you have, you know, big tech and google, i mean, these are probably trillion dollar industries. that have decided they are going to be cheerleaders for the left they do whatever they can in their power to suppress information about joe biden to hide donald trump's accompl

is it losses on big tech? how long-lasting is it? what do you see? ristopher: if you look at first half comps, first half comps for a lot of the financials, more economically driven stocks, very easy. tech companies, not so much. more importantly, what i think has happened recently, you have the yield curve steepening, which is what it typically does after inversion, and you are getting really positive news, the news that we expect it on the vaccine front, and now we can start looking through things. it's not forget, many consumers are in a very good spot. getting back to sloshing and to cash, there's a ton of cash on the consumer balance sheet, and there is a lot of pent-up demand. this is a very different mentality and situation post recession then we have seen in the past. to spend, and i think they are going to. jonathan: that is the line from morgan stanley this morning. keep the faith, trust the recovery. any help me understand what would test that faith in this market? there's a widely held assumption that stocks would just go up. the conversat

you go back into the big tech. i am key on what powell says tomorrow and if that will cause volatility in the market i don't like the way we closed here off the highs. i think we are probably ready after a low on friday, up 7% at the height this morning and just three trading days, i think we could probably come back into 3400 there is tons of uncertainty this election will be contested and that uncertainty, i don't think investors will like, especially after a sharp rally >> remember back bush v gore, it took a month i am not saying it is a completely parallel situation, but it could be a month before we get resolution. james, you were skeptical about the tech trade, but here it looks like tech technology is the place to be. >> it is important to put our thinking caps ton. look at history to teach us something. tech is going to come down 73% have come since march. the average earnings ratio in the nasdaq is at 35. the top ten are 134. we are at all time highs of gdp of tech market we have unprecedented risk, polit

the big cap tech stocks are loving the election results. apple, amazon, google all with big gains today. we just told you about facebook's 8% pop. alphabet up 6.5% "igeccongp b th mi u onpower lunch. >>> technology stocks among the main leaders today with big moves in facebook, up 8%, google 7%, apple about 4% and amazon almost 6%. our next guest says a republican senate could be the ones to thank for this let's bring in ryan dietrich senior market strategist at lpl financial research so this is basically, ryan, as you see it a response to the lack of a blue wave and the less of a likelihood that big tech will be regulated? >> that's right, tyler you think about it, you know, they say gridlock is good and there is some truth to that. the s&p 500 this could be the 11th year in a row if the s&p 500 was up when we had a split congress, but then talking about technology today with these huge gains, we think it is probably as simple as the potential for higher regulation, all the antitrust stuff we were hearing about for the past month or so that

big tech on the hill. >> voices that senate democrats disagree with more.hat is very dangerous if we want to maintain a free and fair democracy, if we want to maintain free speech. there was a time when democrats embraced and defended the principles of free speech. there was a time when democrats embraced and defended the principles of a free press. and, yet, there is an absolute silence from democrats speaking up for the press outlets censored by big tech. there is an absolute silence for democrats speaking out for the citizens silenced by big tech. instead, there is a demand used even more power to silence dissent and that the totalitarian instinct that i think is very dangerous. at the same time that big tech exercises massive power, it also enjoys massive corporate welfare. through the affect of section 230, a special immunity from liability that nobody else gets. congress has given big tech in effect a subsidy while they have become some of the wealthiest corporations on the face of the planet. mr. dorsey, i want to focus primarily on twitter and ask y

they lost confidence in the media and have no confidence in big tech and they are tired and very tired tensile culture and tired of being told what to think and do and i will tell you that having a big impact in this race but people get it paid people are smart. the censorship is driving more and more people to support our campaign. who would've thought this would happen? this is the place weeks ago where they wouldn't look at where is hunter? there he is. where is hunter? and two weeks ago when they wouldn't look at where is hunter and officially made his first name where because that is the laptop from hell and they did not want to look at it because they want nothing to do with it no matter what they do and look, the greatest crime, political crime ever in this country, was spying on our campaign and that was the greatest crime and let's see what happens and let's see what happens but this is something that is big and they don't even want to talk about it and they don't want to write about it or talk about it but you know what, the people understand and you get to see it and you hav

the media and big tech. section 230 should be taken out because that's their protection that was given artificially to them, but it's a massive form of corruption and silence and suppression. like for instance this conversation that we're having right now. they will only take if there's something that was slightly off, like you or i had mispronounced a word, it'll be the story. it is and yet they won't talk about hunter biden. never talk about hunter biden. stole millions and millions of dollars and if you do talk about him, they take you off their platforms. no, it's massively corrupt. i think what happened is in 2016 , where i won, i caught him by surprise. i got him by surprise, and they said this is, we're not going to let, i don't know why though because businesses never been better. we got hit by a pandemic, but prior to the pandemic, i had the highest numbers in history and even now, the stock market just hit an all-time high during a pandemic and what did i do? i came up with vaccines that people did

big tech kind of getting left out.e >> i don't think big tech is being left out, i think people are looking at where can i guess those 50%, 60% returns versus the good old faithful names. and i think that the apples, netflixs, amazons, those are names that should remain in your portfolio. those are names that are have changed the way we live and those are names that will continue to grow i mean, i think there was news out this morning where apple -- again, they continue to innovate they said that they will put their own shifts into max. they are not going anywhere. netflix, ubers of the world, again, names that have changed the way we think and live, and, you know, they will see returns, they may not be triple digit returns like we're seeing in this market right now, but they are names that the risk tolerance, if the risk tolerance is low and you like and believe in tech, that you still want to keen in your portfolio. >> well said, some good names there. everybody will be watching the markets today. court any, always a

we will look at who is saying what and how big tech will look going forward and how biden will look onhis is bloomberg. ♪ emily: this is bloomberg technology. tech leaders across the country are reacting to joe biden's presidential victory. bill gates tweeting "i look forward to working with the new administration and leaders on both sides in congress on getting the pandemic under control. engaging partners around the world on poverty, climate change and issues of inequality, and opportunity at home." sheryl sandberg posting "after know joeg days, we now biden will be our next president. for the first time in 231 years , our next vice president will be a black and south asian american woman who is the daughter of immigrants." amazon ceo jeff bezos saying "unity, empathy and decency are not characteristics of a bygone era. congratulations, vice president-elect kamala harris and president-elect joe biden. by voting in record numbers, they're are making people proved again that our democracy is strong." additionally, the ceo of ibm sent a letter to president-elect joe biden, stating "you

control the information. -- a lot is because they control the information, you have perfect sensors in big techthey control the news we read. you know like the robber "barron's" from a century ago, they kill the story. if they don't like it. one reason that reporters are not saying much about tech investing in joe biden, they know they will get punished biotech, all more reason for congress to take action, attack this monopoly, break it up, take away the special immunity they get from government. tucker: if teddy roosevelt did not break up the trust, people would have lost faith in capitalism, we would have gone socialist years ago, i think we face that now. >> that is right. that analogy is right. roosevelt understood you have to confront the trust it is about democracy, it is either the people, every day normal americans they run the country or corporation and monopolies, that is our choice today is big tech going to run the country or voters of america, big tech has been brazen about this, they want to buy presidency, control the news, control what we say, and run this country. we cannot let

unease in the world today there's google amazon microsoft facebook we chat all of them big tech with algorithms at that. one more than just uses or customers will these businesses would generate is a data they need us to like them for them to be indispensable because the more that we use them the more data we produce where in the midst of a great race to dot and big tech companies are on the chase. for the past 3 years academics nicole dri and alyssa smith he is have been investigating a phenomenon they call datta colonialism. well the scales of context may have changed they say colonialism same underlying functions of empire building extraction and appropriation remain the new lang grab going on there's not land that's being grabbed it's us it's human life the acquisition the construction of data valuable data for corporate use out of the floor of our lives that's the lag right going on and that's why the work load is the only one who does justice to that let's think for instance of all the and use her license agreements or the terms of use that we read whenever we sign up for a new

monologue, i have a very special message for radical socialist democrats and their cheerleaders in big tech and media mob. many americans do not believe this election was fair and make no mistake, every american has a right to feel that way. i feel that way. it's a corrupt and embarrassing disgrace, you will come at the american people deserve more, we are capable of so much more. we did send people to the moon and back -- pretty big accomplishment. many states ran perfect elections with integrity that people have full trust and confidence in. democrats got everything they wanted, millions of mail-in ballots, many with no postmark, many received and counted after election day, they are still counting in some states. some states, no voter i.d. required, no proof of citizenship required, weeks and weeks of early voting, poll observer is blocked from viewing the process which the law actually allows them to do, specifically language in the law -- other election laws altered entirely disregarded and right now as we speak there are still outstanding votes that have yet to be counted, it is now n

as people were having to be socially distance apart they still had to get their message out so big tech was a big part of this campaign and we do think you will see less less cases being brought against big tech right now you have the d.o.j. versus google we think those sorts of things will be kind of pushed aside as well as any other cases that republicans have threatened so i do think that big tech will be able to grow underneath joe biden but once again biden ministration a democrat controlled but to be interesting to see republicans were very angry including senator ted cruz it's going to be interesting to see because this is a winning issue for republicans to continue to motivate their base the polls in 2 years is they say they're going to continue to buy big tech even if they don't necessarily have all the tools they can to fight them scott it will be very interesting especially because of senate majority leader mcconnell and the relationship that he has with vice president joe biden some say that they are a power couple and may be able to work together which can happen but we can

when you combine big tech with big media, what that does is big tech makes someone like biden bullet proof and the big media i think attacks trump what, 95% of the time. so you gave the democratic nominee for president a shield to protect himself. >> is this the hunter biden story? >> yes. you give him a source in big media to attack his opponent with. they are basically untouchable. any democrat with that kind of protection needs to win every time and indeed that type of health. if you look at the donations coming out of silicon valley, joe biden and big tech with his campaign, 95% of the donations coming out of silicon valley went to joe biden, the super pacs and individual donations. so joe biden and kamala harris, they owe big tech. you don't give that kind of money to a politician and not expect special access, special favors but they already going to write the rules and that's why he's loaded up with silicon valley executives of the minute they smell some regulation coming out of the house or senate, those lobbyists are going to lather up these politicians with donations, take t

so how likely is it then the breakup of facebook and other big tech companies well the digital chief of the european commission said yesterday to be cautious with this instrument because we would have very lengthy legal proceedings but one question also is what would breaking up big tech achieve for consumers an important thing to understand about these platforms is that their networks and so they become more valuable as more users join them and that means that already big platforms tend to become bigger and we have to ask ourselves if we were to break up a company like facebook if the result would simply be that the process repeats itself and we end up with one big social network once again yet it's interesting miriam that the e.u. has been more successful than the u.s. in taking on companies like google facebook microsoft what do you think is behind the success doing that well the e.u. seems to have been more active in the past couple of years in this area with investigations into google and apple and facebook and germany as well i do think that the u.s. is catching up now i think

big tech has no liability. they can do whatever they want. it's ridiculous.an there's a big move to do that. i don't know ife the politicians have the guts to do it. but they're hurting themselves very badly. there ishe so many different things. yeah, we'll be appealing different cases, maria. it's not only our case. mike kelly, great congressman, as you know from pennsylvania, has a great case. he had a good decision that he went a step above and they turned him down. i think that was in pennsylvania. i think he's got a great appeal to the united states supreme court. act 77, where the legislature is supposed to approve all this stuff and they had it approved by local officials or a judge. i think it's a great case. butism sure they'll be a-- but i'm sure they'll be appealing too. they haveas a fantastic case. people are filing lawsuits because they saw things happening that they've never seense before. atpoll watcher, i have a lot of respect for ken starr. and i watched him on your show, actually. and a poll watcher is like a sacred person i

coordinating across big tech in terms of determining what to bam and two to clamp down on, this is going of the big factors is going to be the tension between justice democrats and the like putting out a statement today criticizing the biden presidential elect group for having too many people related to big tech in their orbits, too many people from corporate america, that is going to be a tension that we see play out on both sides of the aisle, but it is going to be very pronounced when it comes to democrats and the ability of leadership to try to find ways to satisfy progressives who are just as critical of big tech for a lot of other reasons as well. >> bret: this big tech story is a big one that has a lot of different tentacles and we'll continue to follow. when we come back, celebrating some big wins. for members like. an air force veteran made of doing what's right, not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it with hassle-free claims, he go

people cannot stand the censorship from the media and big tech either. it's one of the reasons we're doing well because they understand, they no longer feel they're getting the truth from the media. it's a big factor. they've lost confidence in the media. they have no confidence in big tech and they're tired, very tired of cancel culture. they're tired of being told what to think and what to do. and i'll tell you, it's having a big impact on this race. people get it. people are smart. the backlash against the censorship is driving more and more people to support our campaign. who would have thought this was going to happen? this took place two weeks ago when they wouldn't look at -- war's hunter -- where's hunter, right? where's hunter. two weeks ago when they wouldn't look at where's hunter and they have -- because we officially made his first name "where." right. it's called the laptop from hell and they didn't want to look at it. they want nothing to do with it, no matter what they do. look, the greatest crime, political crime ever in this country was

biden was in the media mob, big tech, candidate protection program the entire campaign. they all know what happened with ukraine. they know joe bragged, they know he got the prosecutor fired, he leveraged a billion dollars, and hunter made millions. they know about china. they know about the wire transfer, with russia, the russian oligarchs, the mayor of moscow's first lady. they didn't care. these are the same people that now want to lecture us on political discourse and civility and demands for a free and fair election. and now all of a sudden, we are supposed to submit to their power without being able to ask a legitimate question, as people come forward and say, "by the way, i wasn't allowed to follow the law and observe the vote counting on how this election was conducted" or we are just so forget they are vicious, vile attacks over the last four years. well, excuse me, i'm sorry, that is not how this is going to work. at least not in this program, during this hour, and other hours off friends of ours here. i won't and cannot, we cannot be intimidated into silence.

there's a a silence from democrs speaking out for the scitizens silenced by big tech. at the same time that big tech exercises massive power, it also enjoys massive corporate welfare, through the effect of section 230, a special immunitys from liability that nobody elsey gets. congress has for given big tech effect a subsidy while they've become some of the wealthiest corporations on the face of the planet.the f i want to focus on twitter and u ask you initially, is twitter a publisher? ? you >> is twitter a publisher? >> yes. >> no, we are not. we distribute information. >> so what is a publisher?r? >> an entity that is publishingp under editorial guidelines and n decisions. >> > well,> your answer happens be contrary to the text of the federal statute, section 230, h which defines information ontent content provider is any person or entity responsible in whole e or in part for the creation or t development of information provided through any interactive computer service. a was twitter being a publisher n when it censored "the new york o post"? >> .no. we have clear p

big tech selling off today. again, one more time, show me apple, please. ing new computers today? >> that's right. first time in apple's history that the new mac will come with apple's own chip ending its 15-year relationship with intel and at a time when the mac is making a big comeback. you know they sold a record $9 billion in mac computers? not iphones, not ipads although they did make money in those categories as well, and a lot of money, but from july-september, $9 billion as people worked from home, schooled from home, and that's why they need mac computers. 50% of these mac sales were first-time buyers as well. isn't that incredible? stuart: it was just july through september -- >> $9 billion in mac sales, and that is one and a half times what mcdonald's makes in sales each and every quarter from macs alone. this is a big deal because usually this is apple's playbook but they introduced their own chip, they can make it faster, they can build in their own products and enhance it a lot faster than they would if they were using intel chips. but if you

from an apple, big tech perspective, other things that may matter more is what happens with big techif there is a blue wave and what happens to china relationships as you go forward. those things could have a more instruct earstructural impact. >> there's so much to ask about those. why do you think the shares are underperforming today? do you read an election outcome into that? >> you know, i'm not sure it an election outcome i think uncertainty or the fate has unclarity going forward. i do think with apple you have the second set of product launches come out on friday and i'm sure people want to see what demand they get for those products before they have a better perspective there >> all right apple could go down 10%, palo l alto networks. thanks very much for your time appreciate you sharing your research with us that does it for us on "the exchange" today. still ahead on "power lunch", jay clayton will join us with a warning before election day. at calvert, we know responsible investing is hard. if you're concerned about the environment and climate change, how do you find compan

big tech has awoken a sleeping giant. that's much bigger than big tech. it's the american people.are now ready to fight. >> tucker: what should that battle look like, do you think? >> i think the solution requires strategy. we need to do 3 things. first invest in technology entrepreneurs who are grounded in christian thinking. and second we need to create new tech power centers outside of silicone valley in seattle where faith, family and freedom flourish. third launch a new tech movement and rally those tech professionals who believe the same. >> tucker: wow! you just set up i hope a number of future segmentes on the show to put meat on those bonus. do you see this forming now? >> absolutely. tucker. there is great hope in the future. i want the audience and you to know that. we will take leadership from big tech. they have proven they are not able to serve people. they don't believe in people. we do. they can only speak to computers. we can speak to the soul. >> tucker: do you plan to work yourself towards this solution in the coming months and years? >> absolutely. i have alrea

big tech ceos appeared on capitol hill and revealed a few alarming truths.hey don't want to just monopolize information, they want to monopolize your though thoughts. dinesh d'souza explains that next. i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. >> laura: big tech ceos on capitol hill today reminding the american public how irresponsible it is to put editorial decisions in the hands of social media companies. here is twitter had jack dorsey admitting how the censoring process works. now, in this case come of that "new york post" expose on hunter biden's laptop. >> we made a quick interpretation, using no other evidence, that the materials in the article were obtained through hacking, and according to our policy, we blocked them from being spread. >> laura: big tech has ambitions that go beyond simply monopolizing social media, search engines, a whistle-blower who came forward to senator jos, we learned how far-reaching facebook's plans are to con

a way that would frame it as the people versus big influence he meant shall big media big money big tech big donors saying that's on one side that is attempting to rob his supporters of their. rightful election he also referred to republicans now as the party of the american worker it was a stark contrast in the way he was trying to frame it that you the people are being disenfranchised by these powerful forces well on that note he also mention that it was wall street that was the major donor to the democrat party to the democrat ticket all across this country not just for joe biden he was talking about down ticket as well that you saw a lot of big corporations donating to the democrat ticket which i think in years past historically it was the other way around it has been he also really touched on the media issues he were afraid of the polls as being fake polls or suppression polls he talked about the media know we getting it wrong he says they didn't just get the polls wrong they knowingly got it wrong in order to try to hold down look at everything the president said tonight is kind of