i just sent this book to him if you know who i mean, you know who scott ritter. is doing everything he can. and senator byrd cast his whole vote and barbara lee and some others and that's what's needed. can that do any good? well, it didn't stop the resolution and frankly. it's not going to stop this war and this war will not be averted. i think by anything, but it won't be stopped as a series of wars without a lot more courage. and sacrifice them we've seen so far from most of the democrats. or others, but can it help? well came out the president had done a lot of crimes by because i was on trial they finally came out in my courtroom. congress under the pressure of that for the first time the week my trial ended stays before voted to cut off money. for the war which through a little process, but it ended in august. this was may 11th day. my trial ended was the end of the book. here's our oval office tape, which i read after there was released this april. presidents saying to holdeman same time at 11 o'clock the judge burn in my courtroom was dismissing all charg

we got the thoughts of former us marine corps intelligence officer, scott ritter. he thinks there's no place in society for fully autonomous weaponry. i would never argue for a to be in the loop. i would always say that a human being has to be in the loop you. you get the proper rules of engagement in place. and you have a human in the link who's properly trained who's, who is not going to allow the weapon system to be used in a manner which operates outside of the rules of engagement. and that's, that's a weapon system that i would approve of in a combat type situation. human rights watch and others who are seeking a total ban on these systems. they're just not going to succeed because unfortunately in war, every side is looking for in vantage. real or perceived. and right now, the church perceived the damned advantage in terms of these autonomy systems. now, next to infinite lobbyists are suing florida over a new law that allows legal action against big tech platforms. the blocker comes so remove content they claim it violates the 1st amendment. though the state

for us, maureen, co intelligence officers, scott ritter, told us there's no place in society for fully autonomy. weaponry. i would never argue for a i had to be in the loop. i would always say that a human being has to be in the loop. you. you get the proper rules of engagement in place. and you have a human in the link who's properly trained, who's you know, who is not going to allow the weapon system to be used in a manner which operates outside of the rules of engagement. and that's, that's a weapon system that i would approve of in a combat type situation. human rights watch and others who are seeking a total ban on these systems. they're just not going to succeed. because unfortunately in war, every side is looking for advantage real or perceived. and right now, the church perceived the dam advantage in terms of these autonomy systems. a 2nd world news, in brief, now the hundreds in paris to to the street, to the housing of migrants and the homeless things go routed, willing c itself is right, police resulting to pest sprayed, but the activists appeared. so got a result with 200 m

when we us marine corps intelligence officer, scott ritter, says washington may say they want a stable relationship or actions have yet to demonstrate that intent. well, clearly it's a political move because russia is not this dangerous. is afghans dance, syria and another nations that are engaged in ongoing conflicts? i believe it's more of a retaliatory measure taken in response to russia listing the united states as, as an enemy. the white house is very careful with this words. predictable and stable. does not mean friendly, under no circumstances, doesn't mean friendly, means predictable and stable. united states has painted russia as, as an adversary, not as a friend. but what it wants to ensure is that, like perhaps during the cold war era where the united states and the soviet union were not friendly, were adversarial. there was a predictability and the stability and the relationship that allowed, you know, adversarial feelings and emotions not to spin out of control into actual conflict. so the, the goal here is to have the united states and russia talk so that there is predict

so far, no countries haven't acted any such laws. former us marine corps intelligence officer scott ritter, believes that there is no place in society for fully autonomous weaponry. i would never argue for a to be in the loop. i would always say that a human being has to be in the loop. humans make mistakes or humans are programmed by their modalities to permit certain things to occur that shouldn't occur. but i will tell you what, you, you get the proper rules of engagement in place. and you have a human in the link who's properly trained, who's you know, who is not going to allow the weapon system to be used in a manner which operates outside of the rules of engagement. and that's, that's a weapon system that i would approve of in a combat type situation. human rights watch and others who are seeking a total ban on these systems. they're just not going to succeed. because unfortunately in war, every side is looking for advantage real or perceived. and right now, the church perceived the damned advantage in terms of these autonomy systems. but very a is urging the you to act much faster a