into the united states. and as we discussed a couple of weeks ago the secretary of state even expunged the nazi records of people like werner von brown and some of his fellow nazi scientists so that they could work in us intelligence. and verna von braun and his fellow his team of scientists played a key role in the development of the us space program. but refugees also informed our political life. think of henry kissinger madeleine albright the german political theorist hannah arendt they have played a key role but there are others they've played a cube role in shaping our political life. they've shaped our cultural life think of the actress, marlena dietrich. the hungarian composer bella bartok the austrian composer arnold stormberg and the russian french painter mark sagal but there are many many other refugees that we could highlight refugees have always played an important role in the political economic and cultural life of our nation. but public opinion polls tell us that americans were very concerned

united states -- of the united states security is without question, our support for an independent jewish state is unequivocal. i continue to believe that a two-state solution is the best way to ensure israel's future as a jewish democratic state, living in peace alongside of viable sovereign and democratic palestinian state. we are a long way from that goal at this moment. but we must never allow ourselves to give up on the possibility of progress. we cannot give up on solving raging civil conflicts, including in ethiopia and yemen. we are fighting between warring parties is driving famine, horrific violence, human rights violations against civilians, including answer constant use of rape as a weapon of war. we'll continue to work with international community to press for peace and bring an end to this suffering. as we pursue diplomacy across the board, the united states will champion the democratic values that go to the very heart of who we are as a nation and people. freedom, equality, opportunity, and a belief in the universal rights of all people. it's stamped into our d.n.a. as a na

the united states will do our part. we more successful a more impactful if all of our nations are working toward the full mission, to which we are called. that's why we're the 100 nations united. we get around a shared statement. the security council adopted a resolution outlining how will support the people of afghanistan moving forward, laid out the expectations to which will hold the tale bond. when it comes to respecting universal human rights. we all was to advocate for women, the rights of women and girls to use their full talents to contribute economically, politically and socially, and pursue their dreams free of violence and intimidation from central america, the middle east, africa, daph, galveston, wherever it appears in the world where almost call out and condemn the targeting and oppression racial, ethnic and religious minorities. when it occurs in whether carson sion, john or northern european, or anywhere in the world, we almost defend the rights of l, g, b, t, q i, individuals. so they can live in love,

united states -- of the united states security is without question, our support for an independent jewish state is unequivocal. i continue to believe that a two-state solution is the best way to ensure israel's future as a jewish democratic state, living in peace alongside of viable sovereign and democratic palestinian state. we are a long way from that goal at this moment. but we must never allow ourselves to give up on the possibility of progress. we cannot give up on solving raging civil conflicts, including in ethiopia and yemen. we are fighting between warring parties is driving famine, horrific violence, human rights violations against civilians, including answer constant use of rape as a weapon of war. we'll continue to work with international community to press for peace and bring an end to this suffering. as we pursue diplomacy across the board, the united states will champion the democratic values that go to the very heart of who we are as a nation and people. freedom, equality, opportunity, and a belief in the universal rights of all people. it's stamped into our d.n.a. as a na

the united states. and from the very beginning, from 1607. when the irish famine people came, it was already created. it was pretty much set in stone. they were taking half of mexico and sort of completing that vision that they had on independence was to reach the pacific and come to dominate the pacific as chinese trade. >> your argument in a way is that it's not really a nation of immigrants sort of an economic expansionist class that later turned against immigrants. >> turned against immigrants but they don't this industrial powerhouse first of all with a cotton kingdom. slavery was legal. enslaved africans had this unpaid labor force and they kept reproducing slaves so they didn't have a labor issue. but after the civil war when they really started building the industrial northeast, they needed huge amounts of labor and also for building the railroads. so this is when the first immigration law ever passed or was ever mentioned immigration was 1883. that was to exclude chinese who at the same time th

the united states will compete and will compete vigorously. and lead with our values and our strength. we'll stand up for our allies and our friends and oppose attempts by stronger countries that dominate weaker ones whether through changes to territory by force, economic coercion, technical exploitation, or disinformation. but we are not seeking, say it again, we are not seeking a new cold war or a world divided in the ridged blocks. the united states is ready to work with any nation that steps up and pursues peaceful resolution to shared challenges. even if we have intense disagreements in other areas. because we'll all suffer the consequences of our failure if we do not come together to address the urgent threats like covid-19 and climate change or enduring threats like nuclear proliferation. the united states remains committed to preventing iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. we are working with the p-5-plus one to engage iran diplomatically and seek a return to jcpoa. we are prepared to return to full compliance if iran does the same. sim

it's a threat to the united states militarily -- maybe not in terms the united states being invaded and conquered, no, that's likely not going to happen. but it's still a military threat, we can be damaged by imperial japan and nazi germany. and perhaps even more significantly, it's an economic threat to our well-being. if the nazis dominate europe and control the natural resources, of europe if the japanese conquer and control the resources of asia, what will we do? you can say we'll trade with them, but what if they don't trade with us, what if they isolate us economically, how do we grow and prosper. remember 1939 1940, the great depression is not fully over yet. it's gotten better, but it's still on. americans are really concerned about their economic well-being, this argument says we might be in a state of permanent depression. we may not have any capacity for growth in a world dominated by nazi germany and imperial japan. this is a threat to democracy for, us we are in danger. our whole way of life can be destroyed by world dominated, by these dictatorships. the interventionists a

he served the united states congress. they also served in the united states senate. and he and his wife. were the host during james buchanan's administration in washington, dc? when the south left and formed their own government, they invited jefferson davis. to become its first and only president. jefferson davis would accept that invitation and become the president of the confederate states of america. we're standing in the cell where jefferson davis was held at the conclusion of the american civil war. in 1965 jefferson davis received word from general robert e. lee the commander of the army of northern virginia that they no longer could hold the federal army back from attacking the city of richmond. with that news jefferson davis adjourned his cabinet and sent his family on the road for their protection. jefferson davis soon after that would follow he would finally catch up with his family right below right above the florida state line. it is here where a federal mounted unit was able to capture him and his family. jefferson davis was placed on a boat and moved b

but in the united states and canada and especially let's talk about the united states that people, notevery single one but in general made people who know their own history have been brought up in their own culture and know that oral history of their experience was the united states. the only people that know the true history of the united states. descendants of enslaved africans know like in 90% of really important segment of it. in time and -- and the economy but in terms of taking conquest and taking the continent, this was a 100 years war. the revolution itself where they were fighting mostly native people. they were -- with the northwest ordinance laying out how to -- how to conquer the continent to conquer northwest territory and the ohio valley became 5 different states of mid western states and then to go on. so they had this vision and carried it out methodically in this hundred year's war that ended symbolically in 1890 massacre of the wounded knee refugees trying to turn themselves in to the government unarmed and that was the signal of the end of armed resistance by native

so these are again radical black activists in the united states. again for the overwhelming majority of american people, like the pacifists, this is a group that could essentially be dismisseds, these guys are radical, they have some overarching complaint about u.s. policy, whatever, and like the pacifists are not heard on the nightly news, not reported in "the new york times" or "time" magazine, there is a fairly narrow window of mass media at this point so it is hard to get your voice into those few niches where you can be heard by more than a few hundred or thousand people. so these kind of people are not being loudly heard or really barely heard at all. they're dismissable. pacifists. black radical activists worried about imperialism. the third group that speaks out at this time is the nascent new left we talked about. those white radicals that are 1964 and '65 relatively few in number. many of them associated with the students for democratic society. that group that was formed back in 1960 and then began to spread throughout other campuses aro

planes carrying vaccines from the united dates have already landed in 100 countries -- the united statesave already landed in 100 countries, bringing people around the world a dose of hope direct to the american people -- direct from the american people, no strings attached. at the global covid-19 summit, i will be announcing additional measures and holding ourselves accountable on specific targets in three key challenges. saving lives now, vaccinating the world, and building back better. this year has also brought widespread death and devastation from the borderless climate crisis. extreme weather events that we have seen in every part of the world, you all know it and feel it. represent what the secretary general rightly called code red for humanity. scientists and experts are telling us that we are fast approaching the point of no return in the literal sense. to keep within our reach, the wild goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius -- to keep within our reach the worldwide goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius. we have to keep raising our collective am

know, sro unit, versus a family-sized unit to a market-rate unit, i think that the difference is pretty significant. in addition the five rent-controlled units that we are, you know, now being replaced with dmr, smaller group housing units, it's also like a pretty big difference in terms of what we are getting as a city from it. did you guys take that into account at all? >> so we did the five units are all studios so we did take that into account that we would try to replace them at a similar size which they were existing before. >> supervisor melgar: they have kitchens, right? >> they do have kitchens. the difference in the kitchen would be two burners and an oven. and i would like also the project sponsor to speak to the existing units as well. but generally speaking, you know, we are aiming for comparability in size and number of bedrooms. and to your question about whether or not -- i can ping someone from there right now but we have -- we have started conversations before about how -- what the affordable rents would be if they were, you know, for these larger family-sized units. t

units. studio units have been introduced and number of three-bedroom units reduced.r. shifted to an even split across each income tier to higher allocation at 120% b.m.i. it's subject to further review as part of the design review process and to review by our partners to ensure compliance with the city's inclusionary policies. the current program includes approximately 6,000 square feet, designated as community-serving retail at the bid of the mid rise affordable project. mercy housing will take the lead in managing the space. commercial rents to be at or below 50% of the commercial market rate. this is intended to provide opportunities for local businesses and non-profit organizations who might otherwise struggle with the high commercial rents in the neighborhood. in the 2018 term sheet, and in the current program for appraisal, the developer has committed to preparing and implementing a plan for c.o.p. outreach that is beyond the early outreach and marketing plans. they have provided a draft plan and noted that mercy would lead the effort for the mid rise and that

it is in the united states with them too. for the house republicans, we hold that policymakers and south korea would realize that the interest is best served by working with united states, and we hold china accountable for its behavior. unfair trade practices, sponsorship of genocide -- as you know we talk specifically about the uighur population. i am a sponsor of the uighur policy act. china's uighur population is in a genocide. these are things we need to bring to life and really keep china accountable. as for the proposed alliance, there are years of goodwill. these are two countries -- united states and south korea. we stare a strong bond, and we value the strength of that relationship. we should recognize that in the face of those who seek to undermine those values. i am sure you have additional thoughts. rep. bera: yes. playing off of congresswoman kim, there is a message that we certainly need to deliver to the koreans, which i think is how the koreans are looking at it, is not a question of the united states and chin

and society by the united states and the european union lifted. the theme of some more demand is morally just hello the seymour and i'm but and we are making it on behalf of 30000000 venezuela. men and women. yeah. that other people who we are grateful enough, you know, for the support of many un member state figured i know in helping us advance towards achieving this key goal of our country and our reach. and i would like to take this opportunity to underscore our support for and solidarity with republic of cuba, the people of cuba to see up or down whose demand to need on the portable, the fuel minority thought that all elements of the economic and trade embargo be lifting may have been supported by a majority vote at the un on $27.00 occasion was one of the been a lot of us all of the venezuela, also going to be out in favor of justice for money and humanity for cuba. not republica, your republic. and heroic people, and it's not true. i thought for our country has successfully overcome all of the circumstances could aim on. this is how do you t

question for me as more now from the united nation let's putting the united nations.

as president of the united states. my first responsibility is to protect the american people, and i'm proud that we've gone from 2 million americans being fully vaccinated when i took office on january 20, 182 million and to counting today in america. but we also know that to beat the pandemic care, we need to beat it everywhere. and i made, and i'm keeping the promise that america will become the arsenal of vaccines as we're the arsenal for democracy during world war ii. we've already shipped nearly 160 million doses to 100 countries, more than every other country has donated combined. america's donations of a half a billion pfizer vaccines through covax that i've announced before the g7 summit in june have already begun to ship. today, i'm announcing another historic commitment. the united states is buying another half billion doses of pfizer to donate to low and middle income countries around the world. this is another half billion doses that will all be shipped by this time next year, and it brings our total commit

this will make the united states the leader in public climate finance. and with our added support together with increased private capital from other donors, we'll be able to meet the goal of mobilizing $100 billion to support climate action in developing nations. as we deal with these crises, we're also encountering a new era, an era of new technologies and possibilities that have potential to release and reshape every aspect of human existence. and it's up to all of us to determine whether these technologies of are forced to empower people or to deepen repression. as new technologies continue to evolve, we'll work together with our democratic partners to ensure that new advances in areas from biotechnology to quantum computing, 5g artificial intelligence and more are used to lift people up, to solve problems, and advance human freedom. not to suppress dissent or target minority communities. the united states tends to make a profound investment in research and innovation, working with countries at all stages of economic development to develop new tools a

so some had to remain in the united states. others, under threat of deportation, decided that rather than risk persecution in their country of origin, to be deported, or range to be deported to another country, as a form to seek asylum in another country. so i do provide information in particular cases about that. about the choice to self deport or elect to be deported to another country that is safer. or those who just never made it and had to remain in the united states. but i had to call a halt to some of my discussion. thank you. >> now we have anita, if you would unmute? go ahead. if you would. ... a meat, you are now unmuted. but we can't hear you. okay, we are going to move on. john martin's hand his backup. john, unmute and rejoin the conversation. john? >> what's different about these nicaraguan deportations is that they were deported to a regime which tortures opponents. and these people have been involved in anti-regime activities, as human rights watch reports, and all sorts of people report. we are supporting peopl

united states objectives here would have got to start. there are those who are celebrating 911 again. we have seen multiple fly works also over the last several days, the taliban has announced the new government with, with many of the officials nominated by the taliban to leave this new slab mc emory of got to stop. there will form a guantanamo. it may set for autumn inmates as well as other people who have bounties, who have american dieties on their heads. many people more than a dozen at international terrorists, the tide about his obviously foes emboldened by military success. how quickly i took over the country. it has made no compromise in its it's roaster for the new government. so there was speculation that perhaps the type of bad would include minorities would include women and it's new governments as i get a quote from us to the west, west and above. no such thing. what we're seeing is a government that was in power. on the day before the us invaded i, they have the same organization though i must say, a different shape of talib

k to be side by side with the united states. and in doing this deal regarding the australia submarines and this packs for security in the, in the, in the pacific region. that was boris johnson. he has got, he's got a big feather and his cap for british prestige and a relationship that he wants the terrorists, that one between the united kingdom in the united states. raleigh, thanks very much. indeed, rory, challenge life for us in london. let's bring in rosie hock. he's the chief foreign correspondent and live figure home and a professor of strategy at the post school of international affairs. and he's joining us not from parents is good to have you with us. and i'll just see the thank you very much. indeed. given fans is response. do you think that that was the correct response given the nature of this incident? i think you know, it was not necessary. i mean, we have never recalled previous care one better from washington. and it's really very bad manners from the americans to to was wrong. i mean, really, i medic, treating my

it's led to master valence in the united states. where does we know to wars and afghan scan, and iraq as well as counter terrorism operations in 85 different countries. it's militarized, a lot of things in the united states, but abroad as well. and well today is the day to remember of course. it's also a day to reflect on the ramifications of the september 11th, 2001 not only here in ground 0 but in pennsylvania, washington dc, but in the united states, and quite frankly, around the world. gabriel, thank you very much indeed. that's kevin alexander, who's talking to us from new york. well, as you saw earlier, president joe biden later, reese, 2 of those killed in chunks, fell pennsylvania of fishes joining us from their island. former president george w bush's folk in shang so suited vice president comma, la harris, george w bush. of course, the man in charge when the attacks took place. one of the themes that was common to both of them was the unity of the united states. exactly. i press the button is actually just less than the la

how many women, women, and children has the united states killed? and so the problem is when the united states considers its violence more moral and just moral in general, it allows it to justify and legitimize massive states while it ok mama, i'm going to share the conversation with you with your, your cope. harness. kimberly, go ahead. well i, i fully agree, i mean, and this was to the point i was making earlier. is that what we've seen the war on terror due by the united states going in with, you know, with murdering with impunity? it's, we've seen the rise of other types of extremist groups. for example, in iraq, we saw the rise of islamic state, and the united states continues even as joe biden has just said that afghan stan has wrapped up. it hasn't wrapped up because what still going are the draw strikes that have been killing that not just the so called terrorist which by the way, you know, never had a trial were never properly charged for never afforded the, the rights that the us constitution affords to american citizens just just killed w

as is with the united states with them too. for the house republicans, we hold that policymakers and south korea would realize that the long-term interest is best served by working with united states, and we hold china accountable for its behavior. unfair trade practices, sponsorship of genocide -- as you know we talk specifically about the uighur population. i am a sponsor of the uighur policy act. and calling china's treatment of the uighur population is in a genocide. these are things we need to bring to life and really keep china accountable. as a close alliance forged in blood and years of goodwill. these are two countries -- united states and south korea. we stare a strong bond, and we value the strength of that relationship. we should recognize that and stand strong against those who seek to undermine those values. i am sure you have additional thoughts. >> yes. playing off of congresswoman kim, there is a message that we certainly need to deliver to the koreans, which i think is how the koreans are looking at it, is not

it's allowing two units into an rh-1 zoning unit, so the second unit is a conditionally premised unit based on lot size. so there's a secondary approval based on zoning, one unit for every 3,000 square feet of lot. this lot, at 7200 square feet. gets to about two units -- or gets to two units. so it is not an a.d.u. that is currently being proposed on-site. >> commissioner diamond: okay. thank you for the clarification. >> the building is also completely code conforming as designed. >> commissioner diamond: that's what i was going to get at. this is a code compliant project? >> that's correct. >> commissioner diamond: and they have done something that we have requested of other large projects, which is to make sure that the project is amply sized relative to other units, and it's another floor and not just tucked into the back, so in my opinion, this is a code compliant project, it's met, you know, the goals of what we previously stated on other projects, which is to have -- make sure that the second unit is well sized relative to the size of the first unit, and therefore, i am in sup

he has 1200 rental units in florida.t" this, quote, i have the obligation and the duty to protect my workers and tenants. you don't want to get vaccinated, you have to move and if you don't move, one must move forward with eviction. that put the landlord at odds with the governor of florida ron desantis who enforced a vaccine passport ban which means alvarez could be hit with a $5,000 fine every time he asks tenants or prospective tenants to show proof of vaccination tenants. even though people protested people getting evicted but progressive political organization tweeted this to its followers backing the landlord's right to evict. retweet if you support the landlord's move. senator warren and bush will bring the federal eviction moratorium back to life by keeping renters safe act empower hhs and cdc to decide if an eviction would lead to the spread of a disease and stop tenants from keeping kicked out if they don't pay. we'll ask the senator and congresswoman today if it also applies to kicking people out that are not

they don't want to war, but united states, i don't think united states wants a war with them. they know what the ultimate consequence of that could be, that they want to continue to bully their way through the china is building and the united states is bombing now. they just lost. they had to leave. afghanistan was never, there's to lose. they, in their parlance, they've lost have dentist and that's a key piece for the chinese belt remote initiative. so as they pull out of that, china continues to bring in the rest of the world around infrastructure and development and not to say george had some good critiques of try. there's no question about that. but the united states has to join in this world and join as an equal partner with others. and i, and until they do that, we're all our trouble. we're in a lot of a dangerous situation where things can get out of hand in the south china sea in particular, but there still flash 4 inch in, in europe as well. still. so this is a situation that us people, i think it's in their hands to pressure their government. i'm not expecting that t

my kind of out is era at the united nations. we have from dr. christian out with come out a little bit earlier. he is from the duke global health innovation center and says biden's announcement is very much welcome. but the president has options to do even more the u. s. has consistently stepped up as when it comes to dos donations. we are already significantly beyond every other country and now getting to 1100000000 is a very good start to what needs to happen. we know that for the world to be vaccinated, we need 10 to 14000000000 doses. so $1.00 is about 10 percent of what the world needs overall. and of course we're already at 6000000000 doses administered. so we're getting closer and closer. the point that we really didn't hear about was the urgency of the need and exactly like presidents are at ram, opposed to said the need is now. so it's great to donate those who the year from now. but it's actually much more meaningful to use the stock piles that the u. s. and other high income countries have, and we just saw reporting t

those will continue to find the determined enemy of the united states. we -- the world today is not the world of 2001 and the united states is not the same country we were when we were attacked on 9/11, 20 years ago. today, we are better equipped to detect and prevent terrorist threats and we are more resilient in our ability to repel them and to respond. we know how to build effective partnerships to dismantle terrorist networks by targeting their finances core systems, touting their propaganda, preventing their travel, as well as disrupting imminent attacks. we will meet terrorist threats that arise today and the future with a full range of tools available to us, including working in cooperation with local partners so that we need not be so reliant on large-scale military deployments. one of most important ways we can effectively enhance security and reducee violence is by seeking to improve the lives of the people all over the world who see that their governments are not serving their needs. corruption fuels inequality, siphons off a nation's resource

as for the united states, well, for them very little to celebrate. as i reported earlier in 2001 began with, with rochester and pub, invade of gather start to fight for freedom to fight terrorism and make the world a better place. 19 years, 10 months and $25.00 days on. this is america's legacy. they're stronger than sabotaged equipment. a country brought to ruin and still in control of the talbot. that is the ultimate tragedy of the afghan war at was entirely and violently pointless. years and years of an obliging little questioning media. fooled billions into believing that there was progress that america could win to 3 or the taliban to taliban fled to the end of the taliban. taliban leadership on the run. and now the question is, how do you handle that success with it? wasn't supposed to be this way, the taliban wasn't supposed to sweep the country in me a weeks. the pentagon spent a decade preparing to leave of got to start, and even they weren't ready for this. together with our allies, we will complete our mission there. by the end of this yea

already the united states has put more than $15 billion toward global covid response. we've shipped more than 160 million doses of covid-19 vaccine to other countries. this includes 130 million doses from our own supply and the first tranches of a half a billion doses of pfizer vaccine we purchased to donate through covax. planes carrying vaccines from the united states have already landed in 100 countries, bringing people all over the world a little dose of hope, as one american nurse said to me, a dose of hope directly to the american people and importantly no strings attached. and tomorrow at the u.s. hosted global covid-19 summit, i'll be announcing additional commitments as we seek to advance the fight against covid-19 and hold ourselves accountable around specific targets on three key challenges -- saving lives now, vaccinating the world, and building back better. this year has also brought widespread death and devastation from the borderless climate crisis. the extreme weather events that we have seen in every part of the world and you all know it and feel it re

then we rebranded almost them, we became the united nations. it's been 30 years and we haven't had any real action on climate change. the time to disband the un. no, i don't think so. i think un steps in, as i said earlier in, ready areas for humanitarian support, where no other organization right now exist to provide that kind of support creek action. they offered an area which of course i, i, it's a very congested debate about universal values. what are defined, how, how do we define universal values? what i think n d g 's in their very basic way to capture some of the universal values which are not really contested. rice of them in education to be a women, safety and security for children, food, a health care. this is a bit hardy in england, destination and un right now today provide that kind of support provide capacity building support. so we don't disband the un. i'm absolutely not, and i think there's a huge need for that. yes, it is not being able to drill the reasons that it was set up for, but we don't have anything else to replace it

united kingdom and the united states have entered this security pack and that canceled a very lucrative deal on the part of france to supply australia with diesel electric submarines that canceled it cost a lot of money for france. quite interesting that as we see the united states fighting with countries around the world, we see the united states having a worsening relationship with china. and now a worsening relationship with france that joe biden, when he spoke to the un general assembly, he talked about a new era of global cooperation. all of the major powers of the world have a duty in my view to carefully manage their relationships. so we do not chip from responsible competition to conflict. we are not seeking a new cold war or world wide it. in the rigid blocks, the united states is ready to work with any nation will stand up for our allies and our friends and oppose attempts by stronger countries dominate weaker ones. so if the nato alliance is up for being revised, that begs the question of what other alliances and what other concepts and u. s. foreign policy might also be up f

and he asks the united states to reciprocate, but does not wait for the united states to agree. he then goes to governors island. there he is. the statue of liberty is in the background in new york harbor, with president reagan. there's reagan next to him. and president-elect george h.w. bush. george h.w. bush was elected president so he was the president-elect. if you read the minutes of these, this set of meetings, i have read them, and you read them coming from mars, you would not know that reagan hated the soviet union so much. you would not know that gorbachev hated capitalism, you would not know these two had come close to blowing up the world. you would not know that reagan had called them an evil empire. when reagan went to moscow before this, he was asked this question, he said no, that was another time. not anymore now. this visit is the moment the cold war ended. i know. because i was there. i know because i was there. i will tell you my story of this. so, i was in high school then. i was a high school student. and i used to go to styvesant high school in new york cit

that the united states of america is a nuclear superpower. and do we cannot before that they can sequences of the internal american changes and internal contradictions. i'm not going to represent their immortal chinese for the rest of humanity. now i agree with you that day. each historic path is unique, but i still think that historic parallels could be valuable because it was the collapse with the soviet union in 1991, which ultimately served the united states of this unprecedented opportunity of trying to be exceptional nation. not just, i'm exceptional nation, but be exceptional nation, the shining cd on the hill. can we blame them for not leaving after these godly, divine image when we the russians gave up on our cells so desperately at that time? well, i mean, we cannot blame them because. busy other if we do, it means that we see our future dependence on another stage of the future of each country, either its own business or cause the, the historic power and comparisons available. but the available in the way that we see a we can for t

now here's a recap of what happened on wednesday astray lee, the united kingdom and the united states who signed a pacific security package called hawkers, seen as countering china. it involves cooperation in the realms of artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, a, nuclear defense, while a strongly will acquire a nuclear power submarine fleet with american and british technology. china, which is the dominant power in the indo pacific region, is conducting the deal, is cold war mentality. neither washington nor london of explicitly linked the new deal to the supposed that from basing, but remarks from the us defense secretary, they left little room for doubt. we spoke in detail about china, d, stabilizing activities in beijing efforts to course intimidate other countries. this agreement, this relationship does not aim that anything or any won. while china and france angered by the new pact, others are asking what this could mean for nato correspondence only to try and get some of the latest reactions. when donald trump left office and joe biden took charge, it could have been a sigh of

and then the united states present kind of double down on it. with relations with france when he announced this security group that will be supplying nuclear power submarines to australia. this is a group that consists of australia, the united states, the u. k. not france, and that has really upset the french, in fact pulling their bathroom both australia and the united states. so the fact that the u. s. presence now got to meet with a lot of these world leaders. perhaps that has something to do with the timing because we know. 2 that not only were leaders from pushing for lifting of these air travel restrictions, but also the airline industry because the hospitality industry in general has really seen profits plummet as a result of these restrictions. so this will be welcome news for that industry as well. and they are at complete thanks a lot can be hooked. whitehouse pfizer has announced in kevin 1900 vaccine is effective for children between 5 and 11 years old. pharmaceutical john tested the job with a low dose and i've also but found it pro

if the united states strikes iraq, the united states is going to have to strike the taliban. and we're going to have the, you know, declare and all our war. and from our perspective, this is how will war 3 star that you have china coming in and making deals with the taliban? you have the russia coming and making deals with taliban. they're heavily partner with, with iran. and so if the united states strikes, i re nice raise tax strike and tell me a bit me and china and russia have the all our open door to be able to strike the united states and our ward will be started. so right now we're at a standstill way to see what iran does, waiting to see what the taliban, russia and china at the same time. but, you know, today this is what we get for voted in a week leaders. a lot of people, america, they voted with bowden, with bowden, with what's best for the united states and this, the position, unfortunately, that the majority of america is put america and well, and i think everybody just looking at each other going ok what, who is going to be the next move joe. great, always to t

i have great issue with it both our goal just earning his unit, of course, but of course the united states government was going to spare no expense trying to get one of our soldiers home, even though he did deserve his unit and was acting as a lone wolf with the taliban. we couldn't leave our guy over there. it's in the breed of every soldier, every ranger. we're not going to leave anybody behind the bits fighting for us, even if they deserted us. but what it took to get there, scottie makes my sole hurt and fringe, which i think is a lot of the reason why the debate is happening over the last month of how we withdrew different robin on this issue. i do have to ask you, what is the difference between 2014 and having such a commitment that we will do whatever it takes, including giving for terrorist right back to the people we're fighting, as well as others that we release to get, get mo, compared to now currently where we left a whole group left hundreds, not only soldiers, but americans behind what had changed in how the military and how the united states government regard to those left i

so some countries really do want to expand the united nations. but from my perspective, yeah, it is, it's 2 big hunters that either in cape town you work for a institute called global dialogue. but the you and doesn't seem to have much of that going on. does it have a moment? a good day run into my fellow colleagues. yeah, it's quite an interesting question. i mean, i think double dialogue is also the question of how you frame the dialogue and what you want the dialogue to essentially cover. i think you can have your broad trajectories around global dialogue. you can talk about the big ticket issues. you can talk about climate change. you can talk about the fact that you need piece stability and development. you can talk about the fact that in the humanitarian security issues i exacerbated under the cobra 19 conditions, but it's also about questions of how do you create prosperity and common and common peace and stability for everybody and inclusive development agenda. i think where the challenges lie is actually coming to those power dynamics wh

the united states of america is a beacon of freedom.n my tenure in congress i have spoken with world leaders in israel and the middle east and europe. across the globe. the world looks to the united states for leadership and for freedom. our great ally in the middle east, israel, has been threatened. it's citizens have been threatened since its session -- conception. that is wrong. i associate myself partially with the remarks of the majority leader when he said we need to pass this bill today. we do. we need to give israel and the israeli people the capability to continue to defend themselves against terrorist attacks. over 4000 rockets directed by terrorists, supported by countries such as iran and others who wish to seek disruption of israel. as americans, we can never allow that to happen. as human beings, we can never allow that to happen. we need to be heard all over the world in our defense of israel because other countries have met them down. today, we will not let israel down. we will pass this bill. to my colleagues on the oth