manchin says no to bill." "mr. manchin, who profits -- are from investments that advocates say are vital to reducing the burning of coal, oil, and gas. mr. manchin rejected part of the bill that would have been the most effective tool to cut greenhouse gases, a clean electricity program that would have awarded power plants that switch from burning fossil fuels to solar wind and other clean sources and punish those that did not. he objected to a provision that would have imposed a fee on emissions of methane and opposed a provision that would have given tax credits to consumers who purchase electric vehicles produced by union labor." some of the climate aspects, "the new york times" reporting. independent line. this is rob. what do you think about the senator's decision? caller: i think it is great. i think joe manchin is doing a great job. these democrats are out of touch. this bill -- come on, we have the highest inflation in 40 years. this is going to make it worse. the president going on tv and saying it is not

manchin: not much.ughter] david: it has been reported in the press you were spending the weekend in delaware. anything you can tell us? sen. manchin: i had a nice visit. i really did. i had a nice visit. president biden and i have known each other for quite a while. but you know, knowing each other in the political arena and knowing each other as a person is a different setting. since he has been president, we got to know each other as who we are and hopefully he knows who i am, and i just basically said to the president, i said, mr. president, my philosophy of politics is this -- when i got involved in 1982, i always thought government should be my partner, not my provider. david: as a result of the session you had with the president, do you think you came away with understanding of where the country is going on all these bills? sen. manchin: well, and i have said this, i think you will remember a couple of months ago, i thought long and hard about taking a strategic pause. a lot of the things in this

where are we with manchin? >> i would say i think it is lengthy statement that i issued yesterday outlined pretty specifically the events of the last few weeks. and it was important to the president and to all of us to make that clear to the american people. the status and the steps that have been taken, but i'm not going to relitigate the tiktok of yesterday to here today. from the president's viewpoint, and i saw him this morning, he has worked with senator manchin over the course of decades. they share certain values, they are long-time friends. that has not changed. what's most on the president's mind is the risk of inaction. if we do not act to get this legislation done and the components in it, not only will costs and prices go up for the american people, but also we will see a trajectory in economic growth that is not where we wanted to be and we've seen projections from goldman sachs and others today on that front. so he's no stranger to legislative challenges and we are going to continue to take steps

>> joe manchin, i'm sorry. >> joe manchin. >> joe manchin or kyrsten sinema. >> you mentioned presidenttle too long. i'm going to ask you this question though in the time that we have left. earlier this week you said something truthful but incredible on "morning joe." you said, quote, we are acting as though this white house has options. now this was on voting rights. we are actsing as though this white house has options. they can either make this a priority or their voting base will not make turnout a priority for them next year. talk more about that because in the end, that's what really is -- in addition to democracy being at stake, suppressing your own vote, mr. president, is at stake. >> if you don't want to do it because it's the right thing to do for democracy or the right thing to do for blacks and people of color, for your own survival would you do it? you cannot win the mid-term election, you cannot save the majority in the senate with the razor thin edge and the raidsor thin majority in the house unless there is turnout among your base and black americans are that base. if bl

manchin's defense. he's never straight of making the basic point but at a time inflation appears to be increasing problem for our economy. he's going to look very carefully these proposals and he's seen agonizing and on fox today that he could not get there. this is going to be a new effort to work on the concerns he has. besides if you are denied having personal concerns and legislative concerns if you are a member of the senate so, they're going to have to come back and look at this again. i am just -- with you joe and thinking i don't see this process being over. that's not what i am hearing from the people at the white house. yes, they were angry but they describe this as a dance. the next round of the dance ahead. i share your belief that at the end of this we'll get something. some version of build back better bill, it's not going to satisfy everybody. >> i believe we will to. washington is never over until it's over. that's exactly the case here. there is a false deadline put in place. we must ha

where are we with manchin? >> i would say the lengthy statement that i issued yesterday outlined pretty specifically the events of the last few weeks, and it was important to the president and all of us to make that clear to the american people, the status and the steps that had been taken, but i'm not going to relitigate the tictoc of yesterday from here today. i will say that from the president's viewpoint and i saw him this morning, he has worked with senator manchin over the course of decades. they share fundamental values. they're long time friends. that has not changed and what's most on the president's mind is the risk of inaction. and if we do not act to get this legislation done and the components in it, not only will costs and prices go up for the american people, but also we will see a trajectory and economic growth that is not where we want it to be, and we have seen projections from goldman sachs, and others today on that front. he's no stranger to legislative challenges, and we are going to contin

where are we with manchin? >> i'd say i think the lengthy statement that i issued yesterday outlined specifically the events of the last few weeks. it was important to the president and to all the of us to make that clear to the american people. the status and the steps that had been taken. i'm not going to relitigate the tick tok of yesterday from here today. i will say that from the president's viewpoint and i saw him this morning, he's worked with senator manchin over the course of decades. they share fundamental values, long-time friends. that's not changed what is most on the president's mind is the risk of inaction. if we do not act to get this legislation done and the components in it, not only will cost and prices go up for the american people, but also we will see a trajectory and economic growth that is not where we want it to be. we've seen projections from goldman sachs and others on that front. he's no stranger to legislative challenges and we're going to continue to take steps, work like hell to g

blame joe manchin all you want. this is all on democrats for pushing such a massive bill without a mandate. >> harris: left wing media outlets going after joe manchin. they aren't done yet over his no vote on the white house massive spending spree. that's what he said. you have to see what happens on the floor when they take the vote. some commentator saying it could spell the end of democracy. ♪♪ and a new seat at the table. ♪♪ i may have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. or psoriatic arthritis. and a new seat at the table. but we are so much more. we're team players and artists. designers and do-it-yourselfers. parents and friends. if joint pain is getting in the way of who you are, it's time to talk to your doctor about enbrel. enbrel helps relieve joint pain, and helps stop permanent joint damage. plus enbrel helps skin get clearer in psoriatic arthritis. ask your doctor about enbrel, so you can get back to your true self. play ball! enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fa

is joe manchin. should join the g.o.p., listen. >> he doesn't fit well over there that's the decision ultimately he has to make. we certainly welcome him to join us if he was so inclined. todd: tomi, to put a bow on this from what you were saying earlier hasn't this whole episode with manchin show the -->> big divide in the democrat party popular on social media the squad and those actually popular with constituents as i mentioned are much more moderate than that social activist side would believe. i think we have to be carol of making joe manchin a messiah or hero. he did the right thing. we hope he continues to do the right at the end of the day the democrat party needs to have a reckoning within itself is it going to remember forgotten americans who happen to be democrats, who again, voted for joe biden who didn't like trump's tweets but having serious buyer's remorse as they should. are r. those democrats going to represent the majority or placate to the blm, the social media activists of their p

those terrible people agree with manchin. >> i support joe manchin 120%. >> for him not backing downest virginia is suffering from biden's choices. >> absolutely support him. >> i think it was the right thing to do. >> harris: remember how when hillary clinton called them deplorables, that's is a new terrible people. >> i'm against in general canceling anybody but i have a really hard time understanding what she wanted from this. you can disagree with someone. you can go after a public official on matter of policy but to call all these constituents saying you are poor and addicted to drugs because you disagree with me and also bette midler, guess what? she has a lot more money than i do and will ever have but i don't think it makes a difference in terms of what kind of person you are or intelligent you are capable of being. >> harris: people have gone after her a little bit. it was more like a lecture than an apology. >> not like she was joking. it completely just insulting. i don't know why. i don't know why. it shows the elitism which drives me crazy. just because you are good at s

blame joe manchin all you want.mocrats for pushing such a massive bill without a mandate, guys. todd: i know the american people don't want what is in the build back better bill. i hope they can see the democracy is dead shenanigans and democrats bring up voting rights in 2022. voting rights means democrats get whatever they want for here to eternity. it doesn't mean voting rights. i want to get to your op-ed quickly. what do you say will secure the democrat wipe-out in 2022, joe? >> oh, it's the crime issue. you know, we talked about inflation. it's a one-two punch, basically. is the country more expensive to live in? yes it is, is it less safe to live in? yes, it is. this is spilling over to towns across the country, people feel this stuff and for democrats now to act tough on this, it has nothing to do with principles. it those do with the fact they know how to read polls and this will come back to haunt them when that red tsunami comes in 2022. todd: quickly, did they not see this happening as they were doing it

after some suspense yesterday of or whether joe manchin will pop a spate, senator manchin did indeed show up and insisted that he is consistent and explaining to his colleagues, his problems with the legislation including his preference for more taxes on the superrich to pay for the bill. and the offices of senators and house members are separated just by the east lawn of the capitol building. much like a college campus with a central crash the area. but for members of those two bodies, it usually feels like an ocean separates the house and the senate. very few members outside of leadership, ever speak to members of the other body. house members, tend to be left in permanent bewilderment of the senate, all senators feel the same way about the house. as congressional careers go -- congressman from eulogy a, paul is still at the job. having been there for five years. i know, what i mean is nancy pelosi's been there for 34. years chuck schumer, first of the house -- and then it is the senator's been there 40 years. leahy, has been there for 47 years. so five years, five years are still

manchin's vote is critical.ed about the cost of all the new government spending and saying it for some time now. the impact on inflation as well. congress has recessed for the holidays. chuck schumer announced plans to vote on a revised version of the bill early in the new year. chad pergram knows it better than anyone. what would be or could be the next step, chad? >> chuck schumer is basically going to dare his members to vote no. in a pre-dawn letter to senate democrats schumer took a swipe at manchin. members will make their position made through voting not television. liberals are outraged and joe manchin. >> what senator manchin did yesterday was a breach of the trust of the president. he has every right to be furious with joe manchin. it is up to leadership in the democratic party who made the decision to get us to this juncture and how we'll move forward. >> this is why progressives wanted the infrastructure and social spending bills connected. expect criticism for democratic leaders who may have promise

officials tried to get manchin on the phone yesterday to talk him out of pulling the plug, but manchin declined the call according to a source familiar with the matter. then the white house responded with that blistering statement on manchin, basically accusing him of lying to the president's face during their negotiations. the majority leader schumer is meanwhile vowing to put this now doom to fail legislation on the floor anyway. in a letter to senate democrats this morning, he made his frustration with manchin clear. writing that the vote will happen, quote, very early in the new year. so that every member of this body has the opportunity to make their position known on the senate floor, not just on television. okay. and over in the house, progressives are openly rebuking speaker pelosi's leadership team for allowing manchin to exert so much power over this process in the first place. things are an absolute mess within the democratic party right now in terms of the president's agenda. all of this as the white house braces for a record wave of covid cases and hospitalizations. with o

she says that manchin had committed to president biden at his home in wilmington, where manchin visited biden for breakfast some weeks ago, that he would support the build back better framework that biden then announced. psaki go ogin this statement to say that manchin pledged repeatedly to negotiate on finalizing the framework in good faith. we're still going through this, a six or seven-paragraph statement where the white house is continuing to pledge to work on this isush, but if you want any sense of how much frustration at the white house about this latest about face by joe manchin, you need look no further than the white house now publicly criticizing him for essentially changing his position at the last minute. >> again, last minute, that's the part i think is really outstanding here because we know he had some concerns. he was voicing them constantly, but it does seem like this has come to a shock -- as a shock, rather, to everyone, capitol hill respondents as well as the white house. maybe they get a 30-minute heads-up, as you suggest, but we'll get to all of the reaction. josh

where do you think the major sticking point is for manchin?ident can feesly resolve, that this could be a negotiating tactic? >> the issue seems to be the math here. democrats started with what was a $3.5 trillion proposal, and got it down to $1.7 and now it's at about $2 trillion, and they whittled down their bill, and now in the eyes of democrats that was a good way to do it because you cut the cost of the package, and senator manchin saw that as a gimmick because he knows the dems would like to take the short-term programs and make them permanent, and so they pointed to the fact that the package was paid for in full, and he said, yeah, sure, but only over a short period of time. i think both sides think they are making legitimate arguments about the package and the negative effects it could have, and it speaks to a mental divide, and senator manchin wants it at $1.5 trillion and all of the spending over ten years is going to require democrats to make sizeable cuts, really big cuts, not just to the numbers but in removing individual componen

jen psaki blasted senator manchin's comments, writing, senator manchin's comments this morning on fox at odds with his discussions this week with the president, with white house staff, and with his own public utterances. weeks ago snore manchin committed to the president at his home in wilmington to support the build back better framework that the president then subsequently announced. senator manchin pledged repeatedly to negotiate on good faith. on tuesday of this week senator manchin came to the white house and submitted to the president in person directly a written outline for a build back better bill that was the same size and scope as the president's framework. if his comments on fox and a rinne statement indicate an end to that effort, they represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position and a breach of his commitments to the president and the senator's colleagues in the house and senate. a source tells nbc news the president personally authorized psaki's detailed tiktok of his recent conversations with senator manchin. here's the reaction from senator bernie sande

is what lost joe manchin.d from biden who had said don't support this unless you can really get behind it to a white house that wanted to play the blame game. this is not the way biden usually operates. he doesn't blame either side in a negotiation. he usually works it through detail by detail resolving problem after problem. when temperatures cool after the holidays perhaps the white house will see with manchin temperament matters, juan? >> well, i think democrats are in shock. i mean today, i mean, you can't talk to any democrat in on the hill today and i'm talking about people who are, you know, liberal, progressives, you know, from ilhan omar to abigail spanberger and, of course, people at the white house, and they are all in shock. they had no idea that joe manchin was going to unilaterally call an end to the negotiation. and part of this, i think for them is now the question is this a negotiation ploy, brit or is this really the end? that's what you are referring to on that hill piece people saying maybe

manchin for month after month after month. but if he doesn't have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of west virginia and america, let him vote no in front of the whole world. >> listen. so that -- that's one strategy. we have heard of other strategies, obviously, even on this program in the last hour or so. what do you make of that? >> well, i think that is a losing strategy. i mean, it sounds great rhetorically. however, the american people are not paying attention to who votes no on what and when. most people have no idea what is even in the build back better bill, which is part of the problem to begin with. so it sounds great as a political challenge, does not work politically. all people will see is that a vote was brought to the floor and defeated and it will be a big defeat for the biden administration. so, with all due respect to senator sanders, i think that is a terrible political decision to do if they were to do it but i don't think they will. the other thing about joe manchin you have to un

senator manchin had committed to the frame work that president biden unveiled for cop26 and senator manchine frame work. the president said this is the thing he's committed to. it was less than what we wanted but i actually was able to get the entire progressive caucus to endorse the frame work because we all feel so desperately urgent about getting child care to women that need it. getting insulin to people that need to pay $35 instead of $1,000. getting universal prek. getting hearing aids to seniors and taking on climate change, housing. so many things in build back better. and so we endorsed that frame work and proceeded understanding that is the frame work that would be translated into legislation and pass the senate with 50 votes including senator manchin's. i went through all of that with senator manchin and said how incredibly disappointed i was that what he promised to the president was not happening. and i'm not going to characterize what he said. he should do that himself. i think the thing is we know we need 50 votes. that's why we negotiated for so long to get 50 votes because

let's watch joe manchin voted down the child tax credit, which joe manchin might do. but what chairman sanders is describing, is exactly the way it needs to work. he didn't have the whole -- before you brought it to the floor, you brought it out onto the floor, knowing that the child tax credit is in danger. because of mansions attitude toward it. and you just waited. for the amendment. someone will bring up an amendment, to a republican, to strike the child tax credit. in will joe manchin vote yes or no. and you go with what's left of that bill at the end of that process. that's the way it always was, wiring the whole thing of head of time, that's a 21st century invention. >> is that preordained because of the reconciliation process, is that the reconciliation process that forces? that >> no, no. the way reconciliation used to work, if you do the best job you could with the bill, you bring out onto the floor, and see what happens. in fact, our first guest tonight. is the joe manchin of 1993. i don't want to go back, but this is the last time we saw the first year of

it just joe manchin voting no. it is susan collins, the entire gold states will be decimated by climate change and then come begging for federal money to cover the damages from these storms. i think the attention needs to be focused on the 50 republican senators who are saying no. they are not going to participate in trying to make this a better bill and vote for something in the end. it is very much comparable to what was going on in '93. >> the way the media covers this, which is understandable, i get why it happens, is because there's the two joes, two big characters, joe biden, joe manchin. it looks like that is the only thing that matters and we are constantly leaving out the 50 people that it takes which is to say the 50 republicans it takes to put joe manchin in this position. they're all going to get -- if this bill goes down it will be blamed on joe manchin and no one is going to say mitt romney how did you let this happen? >> that is exactly right. like a magic trick. they perform this magic trick that go

and we knew manchin, we felt strongly manchin would not supportbbb looking at the money that has come kill bbb throw the. amy: the family of dr. martin luther king is calling for no celebration of martin luther king day this year and this voting rights legislation is passed. with manchin trying to doom the build back better, a lot of people are saying biden de-prioritized the whole issue of the voting rights bills before congress in order to push build back betternd now both are failing. your response? >> part of my frustration is biden spent a lot of potical capital on the bipartisan infrastructure framework, even more so than bbb. that has passed. we passed before the people act out of the house back in march and the john lewis voting rights act a few months later. it is been in the senate for several months in the senate should have been working on this bill throughout the year. soor us to end 2021 without getting voting rights done is completely unacceptable. it is not just voting rights, by the way. immigration reform, commonsense gun reform, the women's health protection act fro

as far as joe manchin is concerned, i would not vote for joe manchin.ost: let's go to ron in massachusetts, independent line. caller: thank you for taking my call. i have noticed that baseball teams trade players back and forth. do you think there is anyway way we can trade joe manchin? host: let's go to vicki in texas, democrats line. caller: that last call makes me laugh. i am angry at mention. his statement shows to me he is a coward or a quitter. there is plenty of time that can be spent working on that bill. i do not understand why he is walking away. he has been paid off. i do not know if you remember this old song for people who used to work in the minds, but i believe joe manchin owes his soul to the corporate coal. he got $500 million from the coal business from his family business. i do not know exactly what he is against and that bill. he keeps it vague about the cost , but he never talks about the specifics. what is it exactly he wants to see changed? host: yesterday, he was concerned about inflation. caller: that is a vague term. what does

press secretary jen psaki releasing a statement sharply criticizing manchin saying, senator manchin'somments this morning on fox are at odds with his discussions this week with the president, with white house staff, and with his own public utterances. weeks ago senator manchin committed to the president at his home in wilmington to support the build back better framework that the president subsequently announced. senator manchin pledged repeatedly to negotiate in good faith. congresswoman cori bush, one of six house progressives who voted no on infrastructure despite assurances from biden that he would get all senators on board for build back better, says she's not surprised at manchin's decision. >> so when i think about this no, this was a no all along. so what we had was a bit of leverage which was having the coupling of the two bills, the infrastructure package as well as the build back better act. having those coupled together was the only leverage we had. and what did the caucus do? we tossed it. and, you know, for me, it's really -- it's sad. >> build back better aims to extend

joe manchin and krysten sinema.m. there are others that would be at risk for voting yes for this. >> i would think all of them would be at risk for voting for this. this is not what the american people voted for last year and not what they want now. i think we will have an opportunity to hear from the american people next november like we did in virginia and new jersey. an indication of what bad shape this administration's policies are in a purple state like virginia and a blue state like new jersey. american people are unhappy with this administration. >> sandra: the latest biden approval ratings. i will put them up on the screen. what does this mean for your party's chances in the mid-term elections? >> well, if you look at american history, 2 years into any new administration tend to be rocky. only 3 times in american history has the party of the president gained any seats 2 years in to a first term. we have a 50-50 senate now. i think the environment for a mid-term correction is going to be dramatic. i think the

a spokesman for senator manchin said, quote, senator manchin has made clear he supports the child taxdit and believes the money should is be targeted to those who need it most. he has also expressed support for a paid leave program that has a dedicated funding system. he has a sense of frustration with white house aides. take a listen. >> basically i've always been like, you know me, i'm always willing to work and try. i've gotten to my wit's end. they know the real reason it happened. they won't tell you, and i won't. >> wait, wait, wait. you said, they know the real reason, they're not going to tell us, you're not going to tell us. what do you mean? >> the bottom line -- it's staff driven. i understand. it's not the president. it's the staff. they put things out that were absolutely inexcusable. they know what it is, and that's it. >> according to my reporting in politico, white house staff had given manchin a heads-up last thursday that the president was going to soon put out a statement accepting the delay in the build back better plan and was going to mention the west virginian s

manchin insisted all along it was going to be .5 trillion. he could not move much beyond that, and most recently, he talked about the tax credit. the child tax credit being extended for one year. that was part of the bill. but he said realistically, it would be extended for ten years and cost much, much more money. that the congressional budget office would determine, in fact, that this would really add to the federal deficit here so it wasn't an honest cost bill. it had to stay at that number. his colleagues said show us where else you need to cut down here, and he never did. he was too vague. now what you're hearing this morning, senator bernie sanders, many of the progressives and even moderates saying they don't believe that senator manchin acted in good faith. >> we cannot allow one lone senator from west virginia to obstruct the president's agenda to obstruct the people's agenda. jake, all i want for christmas is a senator that has compassion for the american people and not contempt. >> i hope we will bring a strong bill to the floor of

joe biden is -- senator manchin is asking for major policy changes. why are they seemingly so far apart on this where manchin is wanted to bring -- wanting to bring republicans in? pres. byron: sec. psaki: the president -- sec. psaki: the president would welcome republicans into make sure that families are not paying dozens of dollars for insulin and to make sure that people can afford care for their loved ones. he would welcome that. opposition is driven by the concern for many in the republican party that they don't want to raise taxes on corporations and high income. >> this afternoon, president biden gives an update on the increase of omicron cases and the shortage of at home covid-19 testing kits. that is live at 2:30 p.m. eastern here on c-span. you can watch online at c-span.org or on our new video at c-span now. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government, funded by these television stations and more, including comcast. >> you think this is just a community center? >> it is way more than that. >> comcast is partnering with 1,000 community

democrats still need manchin's vote. again, it's 50 votes that we need to pass this through with the filibuster proof majority here in the senate. and they need his vote to get on this bill, whatever it looks like, whether it's even smaller now, some sources told me earlier in the week, maybe it could be $1.2 trillion. so definitely not the $3.5 trillion build back better legislation that biden and democratic leaders originally hoped for. but perhaps picking some pieces from this could be realistic in the next few months. now that this initial shock has perhaps started to fade away, they need to figure out how to balance with manchin without pushing him away all together. >> when you were describing that call, i'm thinking to myself, hey, yeah, just giving you a heads up, we're going to tank this thing for you. it's absolutely stunning the white house reaction must've been, like, what? anyway. so, hayes, last question to you. how does this get resurrected? how do you see the approach? because there's not going to be a lo

think about it, manchin -- you know, the house passes a $3.5 trillion bill, but manchin in july wrote a letter saying, i'll only do $1.5 trillion. and then you could tell in the last couple of weeks, manchin was searching for a way to get to no, frankly. it seemed like this. we had reported at one point last week, he was a no on the motion to proceed on getting on build back better, if they tried to bring it to the floor. he said it wasn't true, but it was clear that he was looking for -- you know, he wasn't going to back this legislation, not how it is. there were leaks he was against the child tax credit for a one-year extension rather than a ten-year extension, he didn't like all the gimmicks that the house had put in the bill to try to fit it in at $3.5 trillion. i mean, i'm just not shocked that he's a no. the bitterness, the wave of outrage is really surprising to me. and now manchin is -- you know, he's taking shots at the white house, the white house is taking shots at him. today on west virginia radio, joe manchin made clear what he wants to say. if you wanted this bill to pa

what i've been saying for the entire year is look we're all joe manchin.ry one of us in the house and senate is joe manchin because in the house when we pass it, we can only lose three votes so we all had that essentially kind of veto power and when you have that power you have to be a little bit more responsible and again, i think the fact that joe manchin comes from a state 1.9 million people out of 333 million, even though west virginia would benefit immeasurably from this, but he has a responsibility to look to the whole country and i think that again is showing disingenuousness we're seeing out of him. >> i know you're home in kentucky. we heard congressman jason crowe, senators elizabeth warren and cory booker tested positive for covid. we are seeing this surge across the country. how concerning is it to you? are you changing any holiday plans? >> we haven't decided to change any plans yet. everybody in my family is fully vaccinated and boosted. so i think we'll probably go ahead, but it is concerning when you see all these breakthrough cases. i'm gl

manchin who say yes it's okay.fact that billionaires in some cases don't pay a nickel in federal taxes. we don't have to deal with climate change, we don't have to deal with childhood poverty and the high cost of prescriptoin drugs, and on the other side we have those that say, yeah, we do. we need a lot more than 50 democrats in the united states senate. >> there was this deal making that went on before this because there was the bipartisan infrastructure deal the biden administration wanted and so did moderates and democrats and also some republicans, and then there was the build back better act and progressives were, they wanted them both passed in tandem. you wanted them passed in tandem and this agreement pass infrastructure and we'll get to build back better, and president biden said he would get the 50 votes. so in retrospect, was it a mistake to do that deal? >> well, you know, the people -- i and people in the house who said that they have to go in tandem for precisely this reason, because we feared very m

joe manchin is now a no unbilled that better. the world economic forum now being pushed out until the summer of next year. >> i'm not overly shocked about davos. i would be surprised to see the likes of jamie dimon. it's a double whammy for the markets. joe manson -- joe manchin accelerating not only here in the u.k., across europe and now in the united states. equity markets are off their lows which i think is interesting because we are seeing a more positive response to that mentor news. we have a bit in the bond market. euro-dollar actually catching a little bit of bid as well and s&p futures really mirroring what we are seeing. >> equities are down a lot harder. in terms of what else is coming up we are going to get conference board leaving index. a lot of the data is going to come later this week when we get pcs and gdp. any economic indicator could in theory make a difference. we will be keeping an eye on the white house. what will they do about the threat of the omicron variant? dr. anthony fauci says he doesn't see the u.

joe manchin. go ahead. >> well, my thoughts are that it would be nice to have some people from the republican side to support build back better. as i stated before, it's helping the american people. we have to wreck what it's for. it's for people that are working, americans working hard. helps them get hearing aids through medicare and helps them with health insurance, gives them credit for children. that's what it's about. it's about helping the american people. it surprises me -- >> and building back broke with hyper inflation. if you cannot acknowledge reality, we're in a crisis in this country. >> i am acknowledging reality. we have no gop to support this. >> what you're acknowledging -- what you're saying -- you're giving democratic talking points. we heard enough of that. >> i'm not. i'm telling you what the points are. i'm telling -- >> sandra: the problem was with joe manchin -- we're dealing with inflation that we haven't seen in four decades. joe manchin was addressing the high cost. 1.5

i represent more people than joe manchin does, perhaps more. >> senator manchin represents 1.8 million people in west virginia well ocasio cortez represents 800,000 in her new york city district. will: you can do math, aoc, don't. yuma border patrol agents apprehend a potential terrorists trying to enter the us through the southern border. >> could explaining the breach of security on the border policy. >> reporter: border agents nabbing a 21-year-old migrant from saudi arabia, the man is linked to several yemeni subjects of interest, trying to cross into yuma, arizona. images show the jacket with an american flag patch on one sleeve and the other reading central volunteer ambulance corps but the upstate new york volunteer organization denies knowing the migrant and says we don't know how he got one of their older model jackets. retired ice director and fox news contributor tom homan is blaming the biden administration for the porous border. >> it takes half the border patrol off the line you open up to criminals, human trafficking and terrorism. how many of that 400,000 can get arrest

joe biden is -- senator manchin is asking for major policy changes. why are they seemingly so far apart on this where manchin is wanted to bring -- wanting to bring republicans in? pres. byron: sec. psaki: the president -- sec. psaki: the president would welcome republicans into make sure that families are not paying dozens of dollars for insulin and to make sure that people can afford care for their loved ones. he would welcome that. opposition is driven by the concern for many in the republican party that they don't want to raise taxes on corporations and high income. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more. including cox. cops is committed to giving eligible families access to affordable internet. bridging the internet divide. cox supports c-span as a public service along with these other television providers, giving you a front-row seat to democracy. >> a new mobile video app from c-span. c-span now, downloaded today. -- download it today. >>

it is a budget gimmick and here is what senator manchin said. what i see our shell games and budgets that make the real cost of this so-called $1.7 trillion bill estimated to be twice as high if the programs are extended or made permanent. joe said that member first 2021. what did i do? i asked the congressional budget office to give a score on build back better, assuming the programs do not go away, they stay in place for 10 years. which is reality. that is the reality of washington. these programs will not sunset. it will continue for a 10 year period and here is what we have got. instead of 1.75 trillion dollars, the true cost goes to $4.9 trillion. over twice. if you do away with the budget gimmicks over a ten-year period, the cost of bill back better is $4.9 trillion, not on $.75 trillion. the effect of the deficit with the gimmicks is 355 billion dollars over 10 years. without, the deficit increases to $3 trillion. an eightfold increase. i am urging the democratic party to stop the madness, stop bill back better, because bill back better -

the president spoke with senator manchin many times. senator manchin is blaming the white house. he is referring to, made by staff or action taken by the president's staff. do you think there was a misstep ? reporter: [indiscernible] sec. psaki: i can't speak for senator manchin about what upset him. i will let him speak to that himself if he chooses to. he may or may not choose to. that is his prerogative and all i convey -- can convey is we will continue to focus on how we will get this done. the door remains open. the president considers him a longtime friend. someone he has worked with over the last several years. that is where we are coming at this from. >> the president's speech about life with covid, the president talked about ending covid what experts seem to say that covid may be here to stay much longer than that. does the president share those views? sec. psaki: we are still finalizing the speech so i can really only give you a preview of what we know today. that is what i have outlined here. that is a question out there. we will continue to consult with our medical ex

joe manchin says no to build back better. omicron spread rapidly ringing new restrictions and closures in the big market selloff. they are links. senator joe manchin told brett baier on "fox news sunday" that he cannot support the president's 2.2 trillion dollars spending plan. an outreach white house responded with a harsh statement and bernie sanders calling manchin a coward. it is the civil war among democrats. tomorrow at noon the president addresses the nation on the rapid spread of the omicron. we do not know what is going to say. this area is fast-moving symptoms are mild but if you got it you say home and so do people who come in contact. that slows things down, europe is moving towards heavy restrictions especially on travel. in the netherlands of full lockdown. investors do not like this goldman sachs is without build back better economic growth will slow next year the dow will open up 400, the s&p down 58 and another big loss for the nasdaq down 220, bitcoin on the downside the latest i have is 45700. interest-rate

but there are bigger issues here, from senator manchin and those close to him.st an issue of the package being too large and fiscally irresponsible in their view. we can report yamiche and i have both confirmed that sometime in the past couple of weeks senator manchin said he was open and even could agree to a deal that was smaller that did not contain the child tax credit in it. but did contain things like universal pre-k, expansion of the affordable care act and some money to combat climate change. but clearly that was not enough for democrats at that time and here's where we are. what does it mean? we'll have to see what it ultimately means but at this moment it is a huge blow to democrats hopes and it is something that many millionof americans could be affected by. i want to talk about those stakeholders really quickly. let's talk about that child tax credit which execs piring, the expanded version is expanding,-- expiring, then we talk about health-care costs and drug prices in particular. in this bill was that idea of keeping insulin costs down to $35 per

i disagree with manchin, manchin has been straightforward and you knew where he was. he has some concerns. progressives have the right to be in many ways upset because they went on a limb against their own constituents and said we'll go with the first part of this. we want to make sure that we have guarantees the second part which is build back better bill would be done. they're not acting out of school here. they are going by promises made should be promises kept and that should be done. we need to grow up a little here and stop saying, you didn't return my call. you put my name in the press. we are dealing with some serious things for millions of americans. >> and john meacham, i will end on you on that note. how important is it for biden to prevail on build back better bill? >> i think it's hugely important that he makes the policy and he gets the policy's victory whether it's in bites or whether it's all wrapped up together. that i think is less relevant. i believe and i am not a partisan. i believe as a citizen for what it's worth that success of biden's presiden

manchin has said that all along.use this democratic approach wants to transform, all right? i don't want to transform. america works. in america we reward success, we don't punish it. i think joe manchin knows those principles very well. my favorite one today, aoc said that there are more people in her district than in the state of west virginia. >> sandra: fact-check. >> fact-check! >> kayleigh: [laughs] speak it is about seven and a half thousand in district, vermillion west virginia. she got 750,000 votes, he got more votes. she should shut her yap, there's enough of this. one thing i don't know, maybe you know or mike knows, what was this last-minute -- coat speed you've got manchin on speed dial, having heard from him? >> [laughs] no comment. i'm working on it. look, he's been consistent all along, going back to last summer, june, july, with the schumer memo. remember? the same things. inflation, high cost, no warfare, the high amendment. he's worried about national security with issues with russia and china. i

you got an interesting take on manchin. i almost feel that you have a bit of empathy for him. >> yeah. first it's great to see you this morning. you know the old adage, laws are like sausages. it's better not to see either of them being made. democrats, we're good at taking the animal parts off the butcher table and stringing it all over cable tv and twitter. that's not good for our country. it's not good for american democrats. we have to remember two things. first of all, even senator manchin has said, he is ready to address childcare, pre-k issues, to address health care and to address areas of climate change. we do have -- even though we have been negotiating this bill for eight months, probably, we do have a lot of consensus in the direction that we need to go. secondary, remember that not one republican is ready to join in this effort to actually do things that will impact people's lives. >> and yet the provisions in the bill are popular amongst americans beyond just democrats. in fact, a lot of republicans do like wh

they need joe manchin. he's offering pre-k, additional aca funding, and hundreds of billions of dollars for climate change, set aside the child tax credit for now. he has other thoughts there. should you take that deal to get something rather than nothing? >> look, i think we have been very clear that the president's agenda was predicated on three important achievements, first the american rescue plan, which we enacted, two, the bipartisan infrastructure bill, and third, the build back better act so that the economic recovery that comes can be felt by everyone and not just a subset of the population. and that's the president's vision. we passed it in the house. there was an agreement on the framework. and ip think everyone was quite surprised to see senator manchin change his position, but we're not giving up. the point is the vision that the president articulated that was passed by the house, that was negotiated over many, many, many, many months. >> i know. >> to lower costs from everything to prescriptio

or support. >> senator manchin: okay, i got you.the thing, just vote. just vote. if that's what people need to show where they are, then vote. i've been trying to say it, how many different ways i can say it. the frustration for my colleagues, friends of mine on both sides of the aisle, but my democratic colleagues who are frustrated, this has been strung out for so long, five and a half months, they're trying to make this adjustment, this adjustment, they're just trying to make the adjustment for the time to fit the money or the money to fit the time. not changing our approach, not targeting things we should be doing, making sure that people, basically that truly need it, are getting it. making sure we can do things in a much better fashion. we have things that we can do in a bipartisan way the way the senate is supposed to work. we will just let it happen. just go through the committees, let's work it. >> bret: a couple things first. there's a lot of criticism that says that you're doing this about environment and climate change,

manchin, joe manchin. interview and then at the end just repeated the exact same thing she had said at the beginning. charlemagne kept asking, when are we going to get a real -- get real with the american people and know that joe manchin is ruining the country. he is stopping progress and ruining democracy. he just went on, and on, and on pier the whole thing was just... >> i do agree with the first answer that went went for a long time. >> by the way, what was he even asking? why is joe manchin to hold up president biden's agenda -- kamala harris should've said you know, she actually had to give it a poli-sci lesson in the middle of the interview. does the president have a the power to do his bidding -- no. >> in a moment here, it could be the rematch of the century, this century in fact. and about 2024. ♪ ♪ ho ho ho! not again. oh no. for the gifts you won't forget. the mercedes-benz winter event. earn about covid-19, the more questions we have. the biggest question now, what's next? what will covid brin