and anton gennadievich knows that our state program has technological development of 1.2 trillion a year, which we like every year bach 1.2 trillion and then, let's see how many patents we have from this . they entered the market, of course, there is, well, conversion. uh, let's just say not the one we would like to expect and not by accident, the president declared the next 10 years the year of science and technology, and we are now turning towards business, when a qualified customer orders this technology in exchange for scaling it up in our market, but the market is not enough we are doomed, uh in any technology, which we scale to look at the export. and here it will be much more serious. if here we no longer meet inside the competition. the hopelessness of the business is ready to take maybe the worst product for the price we date it becomes more or less is acceptable, then you go out for export and compete with global companies that have outstripped you by several generations. this is the biggest challenge. here science bragging says that we have talents, in many respects this is tr

real income of citizens about the fact that no one thinks that in 10-15 years, but i think anton gennadievichited and our meeting today is dedicated precisely to looking beyond the horizon. i'm not talking about all the strategies, uh, for our development by industry and the economy as a whole. this is exactly what is connected with the fact that we we want hmm to understand what will happen in 10-15 years. uh, today's our meeting is dedicated to the construction industry. e, in. e in the broadest sense of the word in different directions and for us for all it is obvious that the construction industry is an unconditional one of the most important locomotives for the development of our entire economy. er hmm it is also clear that construction, just like, say, agriculture, can, in a very short time, er, significantly strengthen its own development foundation, this is what this process needs and needs help. so many. we're checking this one out right now. in my opinion, a very useful discussion. i know that a draft of the relevant instructions has been prepared, taking into account what has been

yes, about the fact that no one thinks that in 10-15 years, but i think anton gennadievich got excitedtoday's meeting is dedicated precisely to looking beyond the horizon, the state is going to deal more closely with the topic of housing and communal services in today's conditions - this is a great load of factories to consolidate to bring here, a solid investment. their volume should be increased factor of. at the same time, all metal machinery, domestic equipment and materials are produced in the country; yes, the task is clear, what will happen in 10-15 years to 10-15 years. they will fly by at such a speed that i can say from my own experience that you will blink. and now another 10 years have passed. and pavel, by the way, many noticed that putin did not have his famous cup. but as i understand it due to the fact that at the brix summit all the leaders had cups made in the same style, these are branded cups of brix, so there is no need to worry. that famous atak, the famous cup that you showed the world, it remains putin’s favorite, this is hardly a cause for excitement, but obser

anton germanovich an answer that is enough to support one and the other. why we're back to yes or no? it 's just a philosophical question. understandably? thank you, and maxim gennadievichesources are always limited, you need to choose priorities as a priority. and then to you. uh, maxim means, if you have to choose priorities, what are maxim's priorities. and i'm sorry, here are the former and current minister of economy. i always get confused maxim stanislavovich sorry. so. e. the main thing is that it’s not maxim oskovych, then all the same. eh, here, if you choose priorities. eh, how now the philosophical questions are said so is the priority supply or demand? well, about after all, you must be such a treatment of demand, which is provided with supply and increases supply. that is, you supported siluan that the question is really philosophical well colleagues. sorry for god's sake. we really have a few minutes left. but this is madness, when such panels at 15 o'clock, well, this is a nightmare, some kind of claim against the organizers. so, what are we going to vote? here's a second. look, it's back. and you haven't yet. e everything. ahead of domestic business in l