in this case, which we will definitely figure out, but it is not for nothing that the congresswoman sparzed very all kinds of claims are specific and there is already feedback, fortunately dear tv viewers, a temporary investigative commission will be created to control the use of weapons by partners, the head of the presidential office, mr. yermak, wrote about this in his telegram. the commission that will deal with the preparation and consideration of issues related to control over the use of weapons received from our partners, our goal is maximum transparency and so on and so on well, let's hope that with regard to this parliamentary temporary investigative commission , which congresswoman sparts will be implemented, it would be extremely important, because if she is not there , she may have suspicions and claims against the investigative commission, which, for example, will consist of representatives of the monomajority absolutely so, without opposition, for the first time with whom i discussed everything, whether there should be mrs. sparz, who, despite her rather strong position and

radio station, she said the words of your country, your president is all quite right and victoria sparzs a republican yes but you should not identify this republican party with donald trump and there are different politicians within this political party and it is worth working with different by politicians in ukraine and that is exactly why well, that is, you should not think that if a person is ukrainian by origin , he owes something to our state, and i think that the main lesson that we can learn from this whole history is that it is important for ukraine to work with different by politicians regardless of their party affiliation. well, if she is a republican, that is understandable, and a few more words about how to actually act now, mr. voytkov believes that it is necessary to suspend these officials in time and send them into temporary retirement attention yarmak and tatarov for the time being, the investigation is for the time being until this discussion subsides and finds some logical way out, all points above will not be presented and what is your vision of how the ukrainian aut

about the provision of american weapons to ukraine, and the republican of ukrainian origin viktorin sparz, who expressed certain concerns about the lack of proper supervision over the use of western weapons in ukraine and specifically regarding the head of the office of the ukrainian president andriy yarmak, our colleague kateryna lycenova talked exclusively with congresswoman sport the day before, let's watch part of this interview and then we will return to the discussion, but what is the essence of the concerns of congresswoman victoria spartz, what solutions do she see and how does she respond to criticism about the political motives of these statements on the eve of the congressional elections in an interview with kateryna lisunova next let's start with the latest publication on your website regarding the introduction of supervisory review and the creation of a special working group for the general review of aid for ukraine how do you see it how do you see it working in your opinion it should be a certain group of people who will be checked on the territory of ukraine should it be a

sparz twice voted against the introduction of the order for consideration i have a daily draft of the law lend-lis and ms. spartz also voted against, er, small clarifications, the first time she voted against , as the republicans voted, and the second time, they already voted for, after all, to prove that bipartisan support for ukraine is there, it seems there is, after all, we seem to be confusing it a little because what you are saying seems to be about financial aid, well, that is, some well, what about you, there were several draft laws being voted on, so there was a project about financial aid in ukraine, well, i have these links and screenshots there, and it is about english that is, twice there was a vote against a on the provision of financial assistance once it voted against and once it simply did not take part in the vote that's all so here it is, well, it's strange, it's strange considering the fact that she is of ukrainian origin, the second story is when there was news in support of the head of the president's office, and frankly , there was a message to one of the russia

some things i do not know what degree of secrecy or openness i think we will definitely hear victoria sparz actually voiced the messages, they are, well , in such an american form. well, for example , she says about the azov detachment and not weeding at all or a unit of the azov national guard. that is, of course, she has ties to ukraine, it doesn't uh, well, it shouldn't cause any doubts, but it seems to me that she is conducting her own campaign on the one hand other the question is that this company is hitting the ukrainian political community with a very strong ricochet. regarding the ukrainian authorities, let's listen to oleksiy holobutsky, oleksiy, well, how do you assess this situation, its risks that arise in connection with this for ukraine, and here are these e reactions that we quoted in particular from the spokesperson of the president and from the ukrainian foreign ministry how all this will be perceived in particular in the united states well, we can not cancel because of the war in ukraine cancel the policy in the united states like elections and so on and we will not be ab

sparz remarked about, such rea

sparz answered marsikaptor to her accusations about putin's indiscriminate and careless help , she statedfore making her harsh claims, ms. kaptur should go to ukraine at least once and see what is happening on the ground marcy, listening to the bureaucrats in yermak's pocket, serves none other than the kremlin, declares - declares a republican, and many of the ukrainian analysts er note that this is more precisely a story about the attack of republicans on er democrats well, not so much republicans as trembists allegedly and if er- let's dig a little into the latest statements of donald trump , what is particularly interesting is not their content. and who is rebroadcasting them on the whole ? in the language used by pseudo-zmi media, trump declared that he would not have allowed conflicts in ukraine in the event of a re-election, and all russian publications , in fact, are now promoting donald trump with his positions on ukraine, and at the end of may, he himself declared that the money to support e- in ukraine, we have what it takes to protect american schools. you see, it’s still not e

office of the president of ukraine andriy yermak to the russian special services, at the same time, sparz data of the data solution and she says , well, you need to put a period or say yes or no, at the end of the day we have to understand that sport wrote that she has a very good attitude towards volodymyr zelenskyi and the efforts that the president of ukraine is making in this matter, you, er, ukraine reacted rather harshly to this, the ministry of foreign affairs said that this is an attempt to return to american politics the classic narratives of russian propaganda and cynical manipulation, although when the lend-lease law was signed, victoria sparts was next to joe biden, and she made great efforts to for this law to be adopted and for it to be signed by the american president, how do you feel about this extramural debate because there are no debate students? i am only an extramural debate. representatives of the republican party are representatives of the office of the president and the ministry of foreign affairs, who are trying to introduce a discussion about the head of the offi

this uh-uh thing uh-uh memory of the congresswoman, she gives answers to the questions of viktoriya sparz because uh-uh, it is obvious that the topic has been stated, the congressman is such a kind of kicker a- and as a hint, because even the european union, which announced the moment of granting the status of the candidate, and about what should be done, did not become this penny. of ukraine from the task of the revision is regarding the use of material and technical resources, weapons, technology and even programs that were provided by the united states of america, the pentagon, which were provided by european allies to strengthen ukraine's defense capabilities, this served as a step on one level, but at the same time another situation was created - this is uncertainty with the final stop, that is, it happened. let's say that it happened that in ukraine the official who should sign has disappeared, because from the point of view of the executive procedure at the moment all that was left was to put a signature, and here it is very difficult to disagree with those analysts among award-win

got a higher education here, then made a political career in the united states of america, what does sparzshe wrote such a letter to biden, let's listen to the question for me if i spend money american records if we help your country, we can, we must, we will make sure that the money goes to those guys who are fighting, who are fighting in your country. well, you are not sure about this now, can you explain what the main problem is that allows us sit down and check that this system should exist to some things that may be problems from our side, but the problems were solved from our side . now the problem is well, obviously, the main problem is not andriy yarmak, but the lack of control over e-money that comes to ukraine and the problem with the formation of such a specialized corruption prosecutor's office. regarding how ukraine behaves in relations with the united states of america. how do you feel about this absentee discussion? especially if it is taking place during the war, what conclusions should we draw here in ukraine, mr. serhiu? when the question is asked, what pspans wrote a let

but in fact, you very clearly noticed this, here is a thing, a memory of a congresswoman, victoria sparz, she gives answers to questions, because it is obvious that the topic of the congressman is a kind of kicker, a hint, because even the european union, which announced the moment of granting the status of candidate a about what should be done. don't become this penny. and when the americans took it up and in parallel with the statements of congresswoman victoria spard, there was also a request to the ministry of defense of ukraine with the task of auditing the use of material and technical resources of weapons of technology and even programs that were provided by the united states of america, the pentagon, which were provided by european allies to strengthen ukraine's defense capabilities, this served as a step forward, but another situation was immediately created, this is uncertainty with the final stop, that is, it happened. let's just say that it happened that the official who should sign disappeared in ukraine, because from the point of view of the executive procedure, at the mome

professor victoria sparz, there are a lot of things in this last name now, and we understand it very, circles of ukraine react to it, but she writes, voices and forms in a certain way i think the position of the white house in particular, because a few more of her powerful speeches, well, the white house will be forced to react , we understand that the history of american democracy well, she acquires others’ cross because there should be more than reacting there. for example, you know the story with our bank native, in contrast to ukraine, in the united states, all these letters viktoriya spartz almost nobody knows about them with them, the american media do not report on them at all well, except that when the first letter there was a message to politics, are there any risks about the last letters at all, there are no messages at all, they are not discussed and see if we are talking about food and waiting for a reaction from the white house we are waiting for what the whole house will say volodymyr zelenskiy that it is necessary to remove yarmak. i think that well, i don't know how th

the head of the office of the president yermak from the mouth of the congress of women of victoria sparzis is so, is this argument sufficient for the deprivation of citizenship sounds funny, what about him i say that in a childish way, as i conclude, even if we assume that korban, as vasyl pidluzhny, a public lawyer, told the public, can indeed have an israeli passport . some clear principle according to which a person either has the right to a ukrainian passport or not, everything is written in the law, he has the right to a ukrainian passport in such a case. and korbut, no, i will tell you the right to issue a ukrainian citizenship is the exclusive right of the president of ukraine, he has the right to grant ukrainian citizenship to citizens of another state if he believes that the fact that this citizen of another state retains his other citizenship is not some kind of barrier to obtaining ukrainian citizenship citizenship and this person can continue to be a citizen of several countries yes, of course, this can be an exclusive right once it is not dual citizenship of citizens if ukra

republican party and, as we can see, is a growing new the star of this political camp, in response to sparz'sl, was the response of a very authoritative member of the congress marsicaptor, who represents who is the co -head of the e-e group of relations with ukraine of the so-called e-e coke in ukraine within the framework of the united states congress of the states and is a representative of the democratic party , and the exchange of such a dialogue, and it is such a dialogue that took place between the two members of the american parliament, indicates that there is a political process, and this political process is undoubtedly connected with the fact that to ensure proper support in ukraine and so that both political forces are preparing for the subsidiary midterm elections for the united states congress this fall. that is, we understand that one of the sources of this situation is the political nature of i am disappointed and this is one of those cases when i am disappointed with the reaction of our ministry of foreign affairs to the questions raised in the letter of victoria sparks to the

states will be with ukraine until the victorious end after the statements that we saw from victoria sparz. her statement was made by the half-chair of the ukrainian support group in the congress. those issues , including those raised by victoria sparks, say that when some members of the congress can promote some of their narratives or messages, the support of the congress of ukraine and the support of the ukrainian government as a whole now, natalya remains steadfast against russian aggression. let's hear what marsicaptor said. in its address, the us congress, led by the ukraine support group in the congress, on a predominantly bipartisan basis, advocated support for sovereign ukraine in its heroic efforts to protect the homeland and end russia's brutal war, although some members of congress may seek to sow division and inflame tensions in general , the united states congress firmly supports president zelenskyi and his leadership so far ukraine is fighting for its survival. those who spread wild narratives aimed at undermining ukrainian officials during the war are irresponsibly helping p

sparz's statement is like this.a regular chinese warning, and to those ukrainian officials with regard to whom there are certain questions about their, so to speak, languages ​​with the russian authorities and the russian special services, and well, if it were clear that washington would not , as they say, up to the elbows with both hands to bring order to banking and other government institutions in ukraine, yes, but at least send regular signals about that what a first washington is absolutely aware of all the points related to russian traces in the ukrainian government, and secondly, taking into account the level of assistance and the level of close security, first of all, cooperation between washington and kyiv, washington reserves the right to express well, to a certain extent. let's say that we recommend certain moments in the ukrainian government that are related to internal security issues. well, in principle. well, if we see that... this statement it is quite new, although in fact, in principle, they should

victoria sparz she is a congress less congresswoman yes or like congress- congress- congress yes sheuse of representatives because there is a senate and representatives here she hide representatives represents the state of indiana there she is the first ethnic ukrainian elected to the congress of the united states of america. she herself is from the chernihiv region. well, she came a long way there at the age of 26. she left, got married, traveled a long way to influence. she is one of the stars of the republican party . the pen signed by lend-lease for ukraine and asked to explain because there are questions in the business and political circles of the usa about the activity and the type of family activity of mr. yarmaka, the head of the whole president and mentioned there about the tatar deputy head, the entire president, who is engaged in law enforcement activities, reminded me of the maidan and all these other things and said that let's explain, somehow, because cooperation with the usa and the ukrainian sit further closer, we continue to give more information , weapons, money. w

got a higher education here, then made a political career in the united states of america, what does sparzch a letter to biden, let's listen to the question for me if i spend money american record companies, if we help your country, we can, we must also make sure that the money goes to those guys who are fighting, who are fighting in your country now. we are sure of this. things that can be from our side there are problems but the problems from our side have been solved and now the problems are not solved with the first to voice some problems because i do not think that they will be public but from your side now there is a problem obviously, the main problem is not andrii yermak , the lack of control over the money that comes to ukraine and the problem with the formation of a specialized anti-corruption prosecutor’s office, because the appointment of the head of the sap and eh about how ukraine behaves in relations with the united states of america. how do you feel about this absentee discussion? if it takes place during the war, what conclusions should we draw here in ukraine, you, mr. se

united states will such complicated love and plan, she took such an expression and regarding victoria sparzdeclared on the first of march that this is not putin’s war against ukraine, it is becoming ge and it was before joseph biden made a corresponding statement that the war in ukraine is genocide against the ukrainian people and for e it is quite important for ukraine to preserve this bipartisan support, which exists and has existed for quite some time in the usa, and we should not forget that in november there will be mid-term elections and we do not finally know who will win them, whose democrats will retain the majority or win republicans, and that is why we should avoid repeating the scenario of 16th year, when everyone was almost sure that hillary flowers would win, but instead donald trump won, and for me this whole story is connected with the intra-american day, that in america the election campaign has already actually started and for the ukrainian issue of both parties. it is only one of the lakes that are used during the struggle for power, will it not be able to reduce the supp

and the previous speaker, and i also want to ask if the address of the congress of women by victoria sparzg andriy yarmak will somehow affect the us aid to ukraine. i think that automatically, of course, there will be no impact , because such aid packages are prepared sufficiently carefully at the same time by the state department and the white house, the ministry of defense and many other involved agencies, the involvement of the ukrainian side of our embassy, ​​and this is not something that automatically changes because of one person in in the united states or in ukraine and what was being built on let's say all these 5 months, if not the previous 8 years. when we also talked about security cooperation and receiving assistance from the united states, but on the other hand, of course, we understand that elections are currently taking place in the united states and any - what kind of media events are there? and this has already become a media event. how many requests are made and how many are discussed both in the usa and in ukraine? of course, this can in some way affect the further cons

the kherson direction what was pointed out in her criticism of the banking congresswoman viktoriya sparzelenskyi is very dissatisfied with the actions of the sbu, goncharenko writes, and the fact that the sbu employees poured out mini-fields for the passage of russians from crimea and of course the situation with the fair from the very beginning, someone from the very beginning tried to displace bakanov, this is written by oleksiy goncharenko and he also writes that he must dictate the situation more difficult. zelenskyi was satisfied with it, but oleg tatarov had a hand here. what did yaroslav yurchyshyn talk about, the prosecutors decided to focus on the one who signed everything and would not have gone on sick leave or gone on vacation for a more responsible moment, let's move on version voiced, i would actually like to say that yaroslav yurchyshyn just said that, actually, well, look, let's just look at it from the perspective of who are the yarmaks, who are tatarov , this is a question we constantly ask ourselves, why tatarov why is the fair so important? it is purely from the point

this raises a lot of questions, you know, in this part, i somehow remember the interview of victoria sparzis background, i do not give political assessments of the violation, but interesting or in fact poroshenko i am not for yarmak no i'm just really interested no i'm just curious what do you have, what opinion is leading you to this maybe this uh uh uh this one is like his partner and so on i don't say that i'm just curious about the train of thought because i in fact, i don't know either, i want to listen to smart people, please. thank you all. and the fact is that maybe now sport is right, you understand when she talks about things that she did not prove in the interview well, just a rhetorical question, the only thing now well, it really raises a lot of questions in society, what are the answers, there are no answers, because such mistakes can be made today, well , the leadership of the country cannot during the war, it actually very significantly undermines our image . but on the other hand, we already well, there may be time, let's talk, there was an interview ukrainian pravda did .