that is the determination of roe versus wade. roe versus wade is the law of this country at least for more than 20 years? that there is some kind of basic right of the nature that you describe. recently the supreme court has reaffirmed that right in casey versus planned parenthood and so in my opinion that is settled law. and that was retiring justice stephen breyer at his 1994 confirmation hearing discussing the legalities of abortion. amy coney barrett is the newest justice currently on the court. she was nominated by president trump in 2020 and confirmed on a close vote a former law professor at notre dame her religion and past writings were scrutinized in her nomination hearing here. she is discussing the court and abortion. i on that question, i you know, i'm going to invoke justice kagans description, which i think is perfectly put when she was in her confirmation hearing. she said that she was not going to grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down and i think in an area where precedent continues to be pressed

your spouse versus your family versus your your own internal value system versus your friends etc. thank you. i think the only thing i would also add to that right is that the conversation also doesn't necessarily take immediately into account the idea that rich women will probably always find a way to get an abortion but it becomes that much more dangerous and women could be seriously hurt and die if these protections are taken away. i think that that's also sometimes lost here too. yeah. it's a stunning thing. this gets to my first book on the constitution poverty. not something that the supreme court is recognized as relevant to your constitutional rights. we hear about police reform bail reform and you know innocent until proven guilty. that's actually not in the constitution believe it or not. it's not anywhere in the constitution well, but if you are a low-income person who's arrested and you can't make bail. you can serve your entire sentence. without having a single day of process or trial. that's a that is a mechanism of poverty. and this gets back to my other point. we ha

griswold versus connecticut, yes it is, griswold versus connecticut has held for decades.eaffirmed by the supreme court that individuals have a right to use contraception. but we have seen after assurances by three of the members not sitting on the supreme court respect for precedent is no longer deeply felt. in fact, it may not be felt at all. what one nominee, justice kavanaugh referred to as on present therefore well-established law, that was roe versus wade. now it is gone. it was agreed justly wrong. but, none of those three nominees express any feelings whatsoever and might be wrong let alone agreed justly wrong. to all my colleagues who say the right to contraceptive act is unnecessary i would simply say look at dobbs. when i introduced, along with the presiding officer the women's health protection act in 2013 the idea that row might be overruled was unthinkable. p our goal was to prevent the growing restrictions on that right that impose excessive burden. what was unthinkable then, is reality now. the court overruling griswold might have been thought unthinkable.

it is are and how much is defined by nature versus nurture.- nature versus nurture.otional— nature versus nurture. it is so emotional for _ nature versus nurture. it is so emotional for me. _ nature versus nurture. it is so emotional for me. what - nature versus nurture. it is so emotional for me. what they | nature versus nurture. it is so i emotional for me. what they did was so unethical, so amoral. stories of twins have long captured human imagination. there is something about having an identical copy of yourself and the resulting bond that would create.— and the resulting bond that would create. identical twins share all their _ would create. identical twins share all their genes. - share all their genes. fraternal twins share half the genes— fraternal twins share half the genes on_ fraternal twins share half the genes on average. they result when — genes on average. they result when a — genes on average. they result when a woman releases two eggs at the _ when a woman releases two eggs at the same time and they are fertilised — at the same time and they are fer

viking river versus mari anna. none of these were five-four per there was far more agreement across the whole court. two of them were completely unanimous. one of them garnered pretty broad agreement. the other thing that is notable is in two of these threes cases, the plaintiffs won. they won in ways that will matter quite a bit going forward. all three of these cases involved plaintiffs who were workers who were bringing wage an hour claims. garden-variety wage claims. one was a sales rep for a cruise line. one was a cargo loader for an airline and one was a group of taco bell workers. the first case i will mention is the case called southwest airlines versus sachsen. disclosure, our firm represented the plaintiffs. my colleague jennifer bennett argued the case. our client in the case was a ramp supervisor for southwest airlines. someone who loads and unloads cargo onto the airplane. the question is whether the federal arbitration act applies at all to this client. if you look at the text of the federal arbitrati

that is the argument that jackson versus women's health made. the supreme court rejected it, saying that even if privacy is deeply rooted in our tradition, abortion is fundamentally different because it involves the taking of potential human life. that distinguishes the right to privately -- privacy. having concluded roe was wrongly decided, the court turns to whether it should be overruled. i am not going through the factors now, i will point out two key parts of the analysis. first, the court emphatically rejects the argument that it should take into account public perception of the court in determining whether to overrule a precedent, which casey had taken into account by considering what the impact on a courts legitimacy would be in the eei ease of the public. -- in the eyes of the public. second, the court held that it does not matter if there has been no factual or legal change since the original decision you are overruling, if that original decision is egregiously wrong. the contrary view was the position of the defense which argued that

viking river versus mari anna. none of these were five-four per there was far more agreement across the whole court. two of them were completely unanimous. one of them garnered pretty broad agreement. the other thing that is notable is in two of these threes cases, the plaintiffs won. they won in ways that will matter quite a bit going forward. all three of these cases involved plaintiffs who were workers who were bringing wage an hour claims. garden-variety wage claims. one was a sales rep for a cruise line. one was a cargo loader for an airline and one was a group of taco bell workers. the first case i will mention is the case called southwest airlines versus sachsen. disclosure, our firm represented the plaintiffs. my colleague jennifer bennett argued the case. our client in the case was a ramp supervisor for southwest airlines. someone who loads and unloads cargo onto the airplane. the question is whether the federal arbitration act applies at all to this client. if you look at the text of the federal arbitrati

for example, why is lawrence versus texas right?what would be the reason that that is right if roe and casey are wrong? and what level of regulation of private, intimate activity is acceptable? ones some years ago i listen to the argument in griswold just to see what they were saying, and it was a long argument. i remember the discussion that the justices were having with the lawyer for the state of connecticut about the rationale for the contraceptive ban. and what implications it had. and the questions were like, well first of all, what is the purpose of the span? do you want to increase the population of connecticut? what is the reason? and they asked questions like, we'll, if you can walk contraception, can you -- what level of regulation can you outlaw? can you requirement and women to live separately? can you limit marital activity to one day a year? they sort of pursued this, and they really found that the rationale for the contraceptive law didn't really distinguish between all of these other forms of regulation that theoret

griswold versus connecticut, skinner versus oklahoma. meyer versus nebraska. if i could go on and on. these rights that are important for marginalized people, vulnerable people need these rights. these rights were simply not contemplated by the people who drafted and ratified the constitution in 1789 and 1791, or, 1868. we should all be terrified. >> we have a radical group of very conservative justices that will be making further decisions like this. i have a question for dr. mcnicholas. you talked about the chaos created as a result of this decision. i have been talking with doctors in hawaii. hawaii was the first state in the union to decriminalize abortion before the roe decision. there is even a potential impact of what seemed to be doctors are taught in medical school. dnc is a procedure utilized for miscarriages. medical schools in states like texas no longer teach doctors how to do dnc because they may be accused of performing an abortion? "small stocks big money" -- >> yes. we will be creating an entire cohort of physicians unprepared to create -- to

. -- off its lows versus a stock up 24 versus the s&p up 14. we think it has expended the energy and not likely to be such a good bet for earnings. >> this is an interesting one. i indicated, when we kicked off here that, i did not think it was all that bad. when we look at -- versus intel, these two companies really diverged over the course of the past couple of years. going back to the end of 2017, -- is a $20 billion country and fast-forward to the present day, one of them is down about 25%. the other one is up 15 fold. they massively outperformed intel over that time. it is really an issue of execution. that is something intel is trying to catch up with. why you would like -- and might not like intel. we can see that in the price action today. i agree with carter that from a tax standpoint, it seems like we have reached a difficult level. at 20 times forward earnings, it is not particularly expensive but not hugely cheap relative to the market. what i want to do is put on a trade that will give exposure in the event that the stock disappoin

versus 16 grams in ensure high protein.igh protein also has key nutrients for immune support. boost® high protein. >>> at the white house today president biden will host an event on the south lawn with mass shooting survivors and victims families. it is the mark of historic legislation signed into law last month. it was a wide-ranging measure that congress has now approved. some critics note this is not enough. already it has been overshadowed by the mass shooting in allen park on july 4. the shooter took the lives of seven people. >>> president biden says he is considering whether to declare a public health emergency as part of an effort to protect access to abortion in the wake of last month's supreme court decision overturning roe versus wade. jasmine, how exactly with this public health emergency work? what would it achieve? >> i think that is one of the things the white house is trying to figure out. the president said yesterday to reporters that he asked health officials within his administration to basically take a l

even if that were past it would not have allowed to go into law because of roe versus wade.s sense, thatis be a limit that makes sense, that is consensus in every single state. do you think it's healthy... nw national consensus is welcome sorry. there probably won't be is it reality. it is profoundly and deeply polarised on this issue and abortion is become one of the most divisive political issues in your nation. do you think it's healthy that partly thanks to the millions of dollars you ploughed into republican campaigns that it is now impossible to be a pro choice republican politician? it is simply impossible now. it is impossible, as a pro—choice republican i hope so. that is for sure. republican i hope so. that is forsure. for50 republican i hope so. that is for sure. for 50 years we have not had the blessing of democracy to help form consensus in the station because of the roe versus wade decision. you had that, every country in europe is how the united states. there is going to be a little bit of work to make up for 50 years of our opinion meetings nothing state—by—s

west virginia versus epa.the dissenters said this carbon dioxide greenhouse gases are a tremendous existential threat to the planet. they are a terrible air pollutant. the epa's of us to deal with air pollutants into congress designed the statute off the clean air act much as it did with the osha statute to allow the agency to deal with new problems as they arise to give the flexibility to arise without having to get an act with congress and this falls within what congress expected them to do so very different statutory reading by the majority and the dissenters of each of the cases. and maybe if you pulled back the camera a bit, i think different perspectives of blood orientation the constitution had in the way that a separation of powers operate. i think you see the majority very keenly attuned to the concern that the federal and natural governmental overreach and go beyond its delegated powers, its enumerated powers to start doing things with the american society and the american economy beyond what has i t

the three cases that i i'm going to talk about briefly, sexton versus southwest, morgan versus sundance, and biking river versus marina, none of these were five for cases. there was far more agreement across the whole court we. two of them were completely unanimous, and one of them garnered broad agreement. and the other thing that is notable is, in two of these three cases, the plaintiffs won, and they won in ways that i think will matter quite a bit going forward. all three of these cases involve plaintiffs who were workers, who were bringing wage and our claims. sort of garden-variety claims, one of them was a sales rep for cruise line, one of those a cargo loader for an airline, and one of them was involved in a taco bell worker. and the one i will mention is this case called southwest airlines versus accident, and full disclosure, our firm represented the plaintiffs in this case. my colleague, jennifer bennett, argued the case. and our client in the case was less ramped supervisor for southwest airlines. someone who loads and unloads cargo onto the airplane. and the question is whe

burridge versus tsurenko. 0h, blimey, that's uk versus ukraine. it's eurovision all over again., the experts think that tsurenko is going to win. the fans predict that burridge is going to win. no surprise there. i think burridge has a better chance, slightly, and watson says that tsurenko has a better chance. i guess we'll see. now, sports like lawn tennis can seem like they're mainly aimed at older spectators, which, of course, is nonsense. look at me, for example. but wimbledon has always tried to engage with younger audiences, and this year, that means putting it in roblox. this is the first time that centre court has been built for digital tennis on the platform, which means its 5a million daily active users can knock up on the world—famous grass. nearly half of roblox users are under the age of 13, so this could catch young minds. let's create my avatar. meanwhile, if you can't get one of the prized courtside seats, or even if you can't be here in person, you can still wander round wimbledon�*s famous hill on the official website. choose my blanket design. fine. visitors c

2002 anyone levels and even 2019 -- versus 2021 levels and even 2019.on: let's talk about that in the context of where oil supply is. a tight picture. much of the world looking to north american producers. in canada, a lot of companies just reported. some of the messaging from companies like chevron seems to be they want their share of the pie. fernando: absolutely. there is difficulty raising spending significantly from the levels they are at today. there's inflation, a lack of labor supply, and a lack of materials. we see those issues throughout the economy, not just in oil, and that limits the amount of growth you can get out of shale. in other regions, you have really cut spending since 2014. we have not seen a lot of exploration. canada has gone into -- the prices in canada are so high. we expect more of the same. these recession fears are putting the pressure on oil prices for now, but once you get over that, we expect oil prices will remain high for the next couple years because there is a supply issue and if there are more problems with russia,

the supreme court ruling on roe versus wade has raised some questions about the effect it could havee who are seeking in vitro or fertility treatments. >> doctor ruben vera was stanford children's health says his patients aren't really that concerned because california is solid on protecting abortion rights. but he says he can't say the same for his colleagues and other states. >> they have colleagues in oklahoma, texas, you know, and and i know that they're having concerns there because of, you know, the thoughts that their embryos not be safe or may not be protected or that manipulation of the embryos can be affected. >> doctor romero says patients in those states will more than likely deal with uncertainty for the foreseeable future. he says he's also received calls from patients outside of california asking if they can travel here to get help. >> all right. time for a look at the forecast. this is the view from mount tam, a beautiful view and the camera's moving a little bit. looks like it might be kind of windy. i have say one word to find out what's going on with the weather. >

it is brown versus board of education. reversing the separate but equal plessy versus ferguson decision. i think this is exactly the opposite. host: it will show that. host:host: let's see what zach thinks. guest: i have to disagree with most of what she said. she is exactly right about one thing. the word fortune is not found in the constitution. we are applying other constitutional provisions like the equal protection clause of the 14th them,, how can courts decide whether rights are fundamental and protected in the 14th amendment or other constitutional provisions? as laid out in the majority opinion, we look to whether those rights are implicit in the concept of liberty of our nation. whether they have deep historical roots. then we proceed to go through the history of abortion in the united states. prior to 1973, roe v. wade came down. there was not a long historical tradition of states protecting abortion. in fact many states, up until the day rosenstein -- roe was decided, they actively discourage abortion in their

brown versus board of education? >> i do. >> do you think plessy was not set a law, and brown righted it. >> i think plessy versus ferguson espoused a document separate but equal that was absolutely antithetical to the principles -- . the question is, do you agree when justice kagan said, there are two ways to amend the constitution, article five or through the judiciary, through the courts. do you agree with that? >> that is typically how we have amended the constitution in the past. >> in other words, it can in fact be amended through judicial action as just as marshall said, do what you think is right and let the law catch up. when i'm trying to get at is, when we're talking about judicial activism, we're talking about the court creating law. the court made the decision. the whole question, is who gets to decide? and, i think that's what's fundamental. all ask you a question before i ran out of time. do you think the decision, d.c. versus heller it is settled law. >> i think the heller decision is one that was dec

luxury versus non-luxury, retail and online, technology, etc.ou have to be detailed, company by company, management, resilience, governance is all more important than ever. tom: what do you do with encyclicals? virginie: it depends. if you include industrials, as we know energy security is very important and given the crisis at the top of everybody's mind. infrastructure, anything linked to that chain. automation i still like, cybersecurity, ai, all of these are themes that will carry beyond this. we just have to go through the next six months. there are always subsectors you need to add two. tom: what do you do with mega cap tech? it is fascinating to get divergence among some of these players now. lunch together historically, do you like mega cap tech? virginie: again, it is about differentiation. specific vision and governance. it is also about capital discipline. investors really want to see profits. they are looking for more stability -- solidity versus when they were looking for revenue growth. this is the distinction between quality manag

griswold versus connecticut, skinner versus oklahoma, pierce versus society of sisters.eyer versus nebraska. i could go on and on. these rights that are important for marginalized people marginalize people, vulnerable people need these rights is right simplyed were not contemplated by the people who drafted and ratified the constitution in 1789, 1791 or 1868 so we should all be terrified regrets i agree with you. we have a radical group of conservative justices are going to make it for the decisions like forever question for doctor mcnicholas. a chart about the chaos. as a result of this decision i been talking with doctors and the y by the hawaii was the first state in can the union to decriminalize abortion for the roe decision print talk was on the doctors there's an impact potential impact on what doctors and soon to be doctors are taught in medical school. dnc is utilized for miscarriages. good medical schools in states like texas and lycra teach doctors how to do dnc because they may be accused of performing an abortion? >> i present the question senator. yes, in f

tom, you are looking at a i for kadant message of the now versus -- bifurcated message of the now versuser. tom: i'm going to go into the divide between the european banks and american banks. citigroup is the arch international bank. going into europe right now seems to be a challenge. matt: absolutely. going into europe has been a challenge for a solid decade. it has always been difficult for foreign banks to come in and make money, there are not great examples of those who have. tom: james fraser is going to report on what citigroup is doing. off of wells fargo, with confusion off the corrected headline. wells fargo, morgan stanley and jp morgan out. citigroup, next. futures, up 11. good morning. ♪ to finally lose 80 pounds and keep it off with golo is amazing. i've been maintaining. the weight is gone and it's never coming back. with golo, i've not only kept off the weight but i'm happier, i'm healthier, and i have a new lease on life. golo is the only thing that will let you lose weight and keep it off. who loses 138 pounds in nine months? i did! golo's a lifestyle change and you mak

gina: when you dissect the drivers of the dollar versus global currencies, how much is it rates versus relative growth outlook? sam: we tend to take a business cycle outlook to understand how it performs in different environments. that puts us firmly in late cycle, and inflation print like yesterday will cement you in that late cycle environment. in midcycle, the dollar tends to be driven by interest rate differentials and central-bank policy differentials. late cycle, it is driven more by global growth expectations and risk sentiment. when we screen for the currencies that are most sensitive to equity prices or global growth expectations, they tend to be commodity sensitive and emerging-market currencies. we have been advising our currencies to be long dollars, but more against the australian dollar and emerging-market currencies, even sterling and other things that are higher beta. tom: it was remiss of me not to give your title, because it is important, head of global ethics strategy at j.p. morgan. let's talk about upside for the u.s. dollar, that would be irreparable or emerging m

west virginia versus the epa, and vega versus chico. so i want to start with besser junior, because the court basically said that the epa can't regulate power plant missions. now, u.s. power plants, they spit out about 1.7 billion tons of carbon monoxide a year. but that is not all this case is about, right? so let us know about the impact of this ruling as it relates to the epa. >> so the major decision that the u.s. supreme court made in west virginia versus epa's, essentially, that there was a real major question with regards to the way in which the epa sought to change the way in which it regulated greenhouse gas emissions. but the court said was that you need clear congressional authority if the epa is going to and knocked these new ways of regulating. so one can see this as the door opening for congress to create a story and authority for the. another chance to get given the contentious congress that we have. a full shutdown of the epa's abilities to at least change the way it regulates greenhouse gas emissions. >> i mean, you sai

capitalism versus communism. is that the reason that, like, the afterwards of the clay triumphs also ideologically? even though that was productive for you? >> yes, i think. so you're asking, like -- the idea that it was triumphant was ideological -- >> thought of the war as ideological between capitalism versus communism? >> exactly, exactly. there is a victory, there has been a struggle. one side has been defeated. we are going to look at some stuff [inaudible] some actual text. but -- spencer? >> i think, i think i understand [laughs]. i'm just going to, i think i'm going to [inaudible] have a conflict thinking, i'm just think i just [inaudible] give. >> welcome back to it. okay. two things to maybe -- three things -- to come to grant this before, that lead to the next thing. it's just about how there was a, kind of, across the political spectrum the way that the wto protests or they occupy movement were really, like capitalism terrible and needs to be not just reformed, but changed. that was really absent in

is that the person who wrote brown versus board of education you all know brown versus board of education the case that says separate but equal is unconstitutional. justice warren wrote that opinion justice warren also constitutionalized stuff and frisk that very same person. so this chapter tells that story. and then the stop and strip. a particular sexually violent practice to which black women are routinely subjected at the borders and which we're not really talking about which again authorized under the fourth amendment. predatory policing the use of policing to generate revenues for cities and municipalities and to increase pay for police officers fourth amendment basically sits back and allows that kind of policing to operate. on the final two chapters of these so in chapter 6 i ask you to read a supreme court opinion. i will have prepped you by the other chapters so that you really understand the law pretty well. and you read opinion in which? supreme court every single justice co-signs racial profiling against black people. this is no exaggeration. the case is rent versus united s

the day before biden versus texas came down, i wrote a post and i should note never to do this, that said maybe they're just going to continue the case rather than issue an opinion or maybe they will bounce back to the circuit court because there are certain issues. for the justices of the supreme court more or less agreed with me. these were big questions that should be considered are the lower court before their considered by the supreme court again. this log is back to 1996. up until june 13 when court issued allemande v gonzales, it had never been viewed this way. in the supreme court turns around and blocks huge piece of legislation based on this decision it made. justice barrett said it's better to kick this back to the lower courts, let them figure out what this means to make intel other they are right or wrong -- then they can tell whether they are right or wrong. it's a very big issue. let's put it in these terms. imagine it was a constitutional challenge in texas v united states that the fifth circuit had found this violates the take care clause of the constitution. in that

that's what we saw in the abortion rights case overturning roe versus wade.t was not specifically mentioned. therefore, we're not going to resolve it. back to the democratic process. if congress can't do its job and congress isn't acting, this is a court that says administrative agencies and unelected bureaucrats, they can't jump isn't and fill those vacuums if congress isn't acting and try to set major policy questions. that was the case involving climate change and the epa. the bottom line is this court, unlike a more liberal court, is not jumping in to fill these vacuums where congress or the legislatures are failing to act. and that is going to mean a profound difference in the democratic process and the rule of the courts or the role of the courts. >> because it's not clear if lawmakers will take up these issues. >> with a functioning congress, absolutely. but they're saying the ball is in congress' court or the state legislatures when it's a policy dispute if it's not specifically addressed by the constitution. >> to that point because now we are seeing