greg jarrett, as always, thank you.traight ahead tonight, a majore update toad alec baldwin saga nt good for him. plus, the left's climate hypocrisy at an all time high . the latest culprit, leonardo dicaprio, this is interesting information. we got kayleigh mcinerney, monica, probably they will weigh in straight ahead. flashing like they really get your attention them and you know, go slow top . you're going to stop now. you put that same technology in the palm of your hand with lizard flair. it's the high tech safety flare with no flame lizard. players use 15 high intensity electrodes that could be seen nearly a mile away. and a powerful magnet that sticks to your car so you can warn people without exiting the vehicle. just press the button for one of nine different light patterns. there's even an s.o.s. morse code and they have three hundred and sixty degrees of visibility. that's why we use these flares to land police helicopters in the most severe conditions rain, snow, even fog. lizard flare won't let you down. lo

we know it implicates his father, the big guy, and nobody seems to care about that greg jarrett.. >> because there's no equal justice under the law that's engraved on the pedestrianment of the united states score. merrick garland has seen to that and so has christopher wray and the fbi. excuse me if i just don't trust the fbi that performed the woornt trump's home. the fbi has a long and disgraceful record of lies and concealment and manipulation. you'll recall that an fbi lawyer literally doctored evidence in order to gain a warrant to spy on the trump campaign. the fisa court excoriated the fbi when they discovered it and ban i should all fbi officials from ever appearing before them, those that were involved. the inspector general at the doj then conducted an scoffed i have investigation going through hundreds and found say shameful pattern of lies, manipulation, concealment, by the fbi in order to secure warrants to spy and to seize documents. take a look at this particular warrant that was served at trump's home. it is a general search warrant. which is most often held to be

you>> know, i saw our colleague greg jarrett's column. n. they actually use garland's words against that.to it's u standard practice to use less intrusive means.ey and they also want to know in this filing filing today, f the fbi lie to the magistrate that they omit exculpatory information. there's got toul be at leasts 30 questions just based on those two observations in this filing today. as well, right? yeah, there's no doubt.s listen, there's so much we don't know. it's like march or april of 2017 when you and i we're working on the russian collusion story, we're going to learn a lot of factstssiing. ew but tonight we have a new facte that happened. the biden white house can no b c longer claim it wasn't involved in the starting of this criminal investigation or its facilitation. in fact, long before the raid we , may.ing about april that's now a fact that's no n longer in doubt. john solomon, great work as always. thank you. joining us now, fox news legal analyst greg jarret, harvard law professor alan dershowitz. greg, let me start wit

greg jarrett, thank you. also tonight, joe biden used his remarks in pennsylvania earlier today to preview what we can expect at his big primetime address that nobody will be watching thursday. more baseless, vicious political attacks on conservatives. and while joey pretends to care about unity just like he did in his inauguration speech, here's what he said earlier today in pennsylvania. take a look. >> let me say this to my republican friends in congress. don't tell me you support law enforcement. >> if you won't condemn what happened on a 6th, don't tell me for god's sake, whose side are you on ? whose side are you on ? look great on the side of a mob ,the side of the police, you can't be pro law enforcement and pro insurrection. where was joe in the summer of 2020 one five hundred and seventy four riots broke out and thousands of cops injured, pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, billions in property damage and dozens of dead americans. where was he then? is this a joe biden means when

joining us is greg jarrett.t? >> absolutely right and look, the imperious garland, his attitude is how dare a lowly magistrate deny my earlier request as he did on monday to keep everything secret so i suspect garland, you know, will submit read the actions that are page after page of thick blank inc. covering everything except the title and page number, a few words like the and and and if the magistrate says that is not good enough, i will un-reject your reductions and release them you can bet garland will run like a jack rabbit to his old pals on the higher court seeking a stay and an appeal and dragging this thing out so i'm not optimistic that we are going to get much. ashley: is it unusual to release the details of the affidavit or is this such a case of such standing that it involves a former president in his personal home that it should be released to the public? >> the magistrate said this is historic and unprecedented and then it requires i think transparency that is unusual and atypical. americans dese

. >> sean: let me give you a fox news helped line greg jarrett, grassley says new whistle blower reveals deeply rooted political infection within the fbi. can the american people trust that the fbi and the doj are committed to equal justice and equal application of our laws? because i'm feeling they can't have that confidence that we need to have. >> yeah, trust is earned, and the fbi and the department of justice has squandered any trust. yet you have merrick garland standing in front of cameras saying trust the fbi, how dare anybody question their integrity. well, look at their track record. this is the fbi that had a lawyer who doctored evidence to gain a warrant to spy on the trump campaign. the fbi paid an ex british spy to conger up phoney evidence that the fbi knew was bogus and yet they ran with it. this is the fbi who had a director, james comey, who stole government documents and leaked them to the media admittedly for the purpose of triggering a special counsel, who just happened to be his long-time friend and colleague in the collusion investigation, which turned out to be no

. >> griff: well, and sam our fox news legal analyst greg jarrett was basically calling garland out for. take a listen to this. >> merrick garland todaying unwhen ittingly stupidly undermind his own argument when he said oh, our standard practice is to use the least intrusive method. that's called a subpoena. and the fbi did that two months ago. they were counting on donald trump challenging it so that they would then be poised for a raid. but trump capitulated he gave them everything they wanted so they probably sat back at the doj and said now what are we going to do. >> griff: so, sam, as one who's familiar with investing these things, it seems to me that we really need to know what happened between those meetings in june, when everything seemed to be -- everyone was on the same page, and the raid on monday. >> absolutely. and while normally that might not be something that's done in the public, in this instance, the department of justice owes an explanation and a time line. you know, we've seen a very public explanation in other cases. attorney general barr didn't have to release th

greg jarrett with us this morning.big. is it? >> reporter: it could be. i think other employers take note and pay attention and may decide they will do the same thing, reach a settlement. a matter of law because it's not a judgment confirmed by higher courts, it has no force in effect legally on other jurisdictions but this is a clear violation of title vii of the civil rights act, the government was discriminating against individuals based on their religion. they didn't provide a religious exemption that employees demanded. stuart: i hope it goes further. you have a new op-ed, merrick garland's case is dangerously problematic, that is the wording of your op-ed. tell me why is dangerously problematic. >> if this is a dispute as doj and fbi says over documents on the federal records act, that is not a criminal statute. it has no enforcement provision. you can't get a criminal warrant to search and seize the president's home and office. what did merrick garland do? tossed in 3 criminal statutes, problem with those statut

joining us now, pam bondi, is with us for commentary as well as foxr legal analyst o greg jarrett. pam, your taken on all of this sean, having personally as a prosecutor for 18 years, signedu thousands of subpoenas, thousandsub, many times people don't comply. so what do you do? you t either issue a new subpoet or you do a motion to compel. why wasn't i done in this case?e the people were working well with them. whyywell wasn't that done? that'sn a question for merrick garland. number two fornd eric garland, t the warrant. think t about the warrant if w you're going to issue a warrant, the reason has to be i'm worriede they're going to destroy evidence. well, what suspect about that? we'venc now learned that warrant was signed on friday, but not executed until monday. so why get the warrant that doesn't even make sense. number. three , i have personally been involved in many, many search warrants authorizing them, the execution of the search warrants and they came in there with guns blazing, like you said, for documents. you know what you do?u go up you get a couple of agents. you

the price of principal harvard lawnc professr alan dershowitz, along with fox is legal analyst greg jarrett. professor, i'll begin with you tonight and ask you why are they afraid to let us see the affidavit that justify this magistrate granting this warrant to go into mar a lago? i've had a principal for 60 years. i wrote about it in my new i book, the price of principal, and that is if there's a dispute and one side wants the truth to come out and the other side says, no, we don't want the truth to come out. always believed the person who wants the truth to come out. tellinghe person who's's the truth. and so the trump people want the affidavit to be released. the justice department doesn't. now, i'm not suggesting releasing the entire affidavit. you can redact the names of witnesses. you can redact the names of the agents, you can redactt l sources and methods. but let'set know what they were looking for. ng fi want to know particularly because to get a search warrantc at the stateh, you have to have very particular evidence. what was in p the safe from t reporting? we now know nothinghe

pr professor dershowitz, greg jarrett, thank you very much. all right. straight ahead, our owad, nour sara carter's exclusive investigation of the dangers ofc human trafficking as the bidenki border crisis continues. she joins us along with buck sexton. when we return. home home, something to be proud of. home safe comfort where the production family home. i was deployed to afghanistan. i was on patrol march twenty six twelve, ten during a dismounted patrol. i happened to step in the wrong spot and took a sniper round into the chest. this is the date i was i lost my legs almost immediately. i lost my left hand and both my legs above the knee. my arm was gone so i closed my eyes thinking to myself, if i just keep breathing, i will make it home to my wife. i just want to serve my country every day still adapting to this new life. it was hard having everybody change your lifestyle to take care of me. a typical home doesn't feel like home to me. they have to carry my chair up the stairs. the hardest thing in my life is to call nail's my children to help pick

they're admitting this and they're dismissing it as if it's nothing that is not that greg jarrett because basically you're not going to convince me thatt going the sa people that rated donalda-lago trump's mar a lago his own homee and the same people, the same office involved in the russia i collusion, folks didn'tformat read every bit of informationio they had in their handr s. dn't you'll never convince me that didn't happen. yeah, of course they share the information. e fact tha look, the fact that merrickgarln garland admitted and confessedge that they scooped up privileged s are not entitled to have only underscores the lawlessneses ts of his fourh amendment violated a search warrant. y they went in there and theygrin grabbed anything and everythingg .w garlan i spent 10 hours doing it. and now garland has the audacity to say to the federal district court judge, you know, don't worry about it. ready se thewe've already seen a the documents. we've segregated them becausd te we used a tank team. i got news for merrick garland . teams are themselves tainted. they are clever artifice, no

greg jarrett, we'll start with you. be one , they never got to t the bottom. we now know that on four separate occasions, even though it says verified at the top ofoc fisa aren't that they used the dirty russian disinformation dossier that wasi completely unverifiable and they even used that after debunked. they had hunter biden's laptop before anybody and they didn't do a thing with it.p and now we've got these fbi whistle blowers and they don't seem to be paying much to them either. and nor did they pursue justice for the people that wereer arriving. five hundred and seventy four riots in the summer of 2020e. seems like it's one sided to me. yeah, there's no equal application of the law under christopher wray or the attorney general merrick garland. these multiple whistleblowers have come forward with compelling and credible evidence that there was a schemeed among senior fbi officials to bury and hide incriminating evidence of ednter biden's influence peddling while at the same time deliberately and falsely portraying his laptop and his contents. sean, as r

joining is now fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, harvard law professor alan dershowitz. greg, you have a call about you over the entire -- by the way, there is professor dershowitz's book, "the price of principle." you read the filing of the trump team today and he raised four big questions that i want you to go through them for our audience. >> in addition to asking for special master, neutral independent person stefan. they also make four important constitutional arguments. this is the 21 page court filing in the southern district. number one, they raised the question, did the fbi and department of justice lied to the magistrate in order to gain the warrant? did they omit exculpatory evidence that trump was actually cooperating? that was vital information for the magistrate. number two, did the fbi disclosed a pretextual reason, dual-purpose, ulterior motive related to the generally six? this was simply a charade over documents. number three, they argue that the warrant was overly broad. the argue today in the column. same argument i made in the column. take a look at the w

. >> brian: bring in gregg jarrett fox news legal analyst. greg, i spoke to eric last night.ily has not seen the affidavit. has not seen the warrant yet. they flashed it to a lawyer on the premises. how unusual is that? >> normally the recipient would only see the warrant itself. not the supporting materials, which are sworn affidavits by fbi officials or others who give sustenance to the probable cause that evidence of a crime exists at mar-a-lago and trump's residence there. i think it is important -- i understand that there is always a policy of non-transparency during the course of an investigation. this is such an extraordinarily aggressive move by the department of justice and the fbi that i really do think that merrick garland deserves the american public some answers to -- americans are -- they care deeply about fairness. they have a strong moral character. and they find repub nant thuggish authoritarianism and this smacks of it. >> ainsley: they hate uneven justice. >> yes. >> ainsley: what do you make about this magistrate judge not a federal judge appointed by a pr