it is at some enterprise or in the spk that basically all people are engaged in agriculture.'s a big tries more mass volume. we are more here less. we are like a small branch. i've been practicing for over 30 years since this. the greenhouse is clean, yes, for our family, we put drip irrigation much more efficiently and more conveniently there, you can even add various trace elements of fertilizer to cucumbers , you need to look at tomatoes, that they lack phosphorus nitrogen or there are some diseases. these are all vegetables. all even very large very, very large territories. well, it happened. in our project, we will show you unique personalities, for example, two hours in paris and i know paris. bacillus, i wanted to collect. maybe they break stereotypes with an example and their own experience does not necessarily have to feel something to break something. eh, something here, as if to try on the tooth. they thought i had a poo, i actually have a poo, i will say in every issue. i had a choice to either buy a one-room apartment or build stereotypes on the belarus 24 tv cha

people are working in the spk that is, for the time being, in short, who does not have enough jobs, even entering from the homeland leaves for a cable. there you work , you work on farms producing some kind of industry or processing plants. nas nemagnas are generally the indigenous inhabitants of the village. this is the beginning, who stays here to live, in addition to the main work, who works. for example, at school, in hospitals , shops are also engaged in subsidiary farming and agriculture. people produce in large the quantity of all production such as hothouse cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, you plant a large number of cabbage, potatoes , auxiliary farms to keep cows with a puppy and pasture by the village council, providing in full . in this problem, too, just work also in the subsidiary farm, they took the pigs and birds even provide themselves with surpluses and sell them on the market, especially if they are sold out. my whole life came with bees, because i love they understand me, although the sludge is also suitable to have an individual, for example, i work on the platform. i k

higher crime rates, then political division, russia/ukraine situation and it's a list of about 1 spark spk 15 spinnings, border security is toward the bottom. if you cross reference, republicans are plus 15 on crime, plus 13 on inflation. that's the top two things they say 89 and 79% are. you're starting to see that republicans should be doing really well in the elections coming up because the things that people are most concerned about, they think republicans have a better handle on. rachel: sos there's a reason i made my podcast from the kitchen table because the kitchen table is really where the rubber meets the road in terms of politics and so we have also on the fox news poll an understanding of where your family has had to cut back to afford necessities. so look at this poll. it says that in july -- in march of 2022, 67% said they had to cut back a lot and now it's up to 71%. joey: heading in the wrong direction. rachel: it's going in the wrong direction. if you talk to any of our fox business hosts and correspondents who are so good and have their pulse on what's happening, they don

almost word for word, e-mail that i got from brian mccarthy the nfl pr guy,ro i might dodger when i spkto me in the nfl rogers very busy and trying to promote diversity blob loblaw as i said to tallman and others, why would they talk to me they said the same thing he has embarrassed i don't think roger is a bad guy. >> he's not the problem. >> there paying him 44 million bucks a year. >> so doug williams wrote the forward to the book and he said thisa book would not be written by 70 was like a lot of people shrug and say, just another black guy pointing so i am wondering how you took advantage of your weakness to write this book and how they came into play starting with you think you could have? been published since you were not right. >> was a good question and i don't know the answer to that but both kevin and michael, you know well, you know that both well, so to me when i talk to them early in my reporting, that was better that this book was being written by a white guy in the going to be some guys out there and one of the publishers who turned down the idea of front publishers retu

. >> council, can you just spk to the representation that was made about the property in particular and the fact at prior to their purchasing it, there was se concernbout the property being a wetland? i misunderstood that, i thought th went into it knowing that this might be a wetland. >> there was a jurisdictional discriminaone in 1996 by a prior owner. they were not aware of that. >>had been as a part of their pungeement, shouldn't they have gathered information about the prior -- property pripurchasing it? >> justice jackson, there is no indication eithe the county buidepartment and their deed of title, anywher that this was a wetland. moreover, even if they had b aware, thaturisdiction determination would have given thcomfort. >> did they se property? i understood in the pictur that you could tell part of it was a wetland by looking at it. >> i believe mr. fletcher wa referring to after the initial workbeen don the picture shows that there is water on the property. but thatnot show how was done before. >> you keep talking about notice an notice and property owners not being able to