u. s. defense secretary says nato remains committed to supporting ukraine. well, certainly not a question of like of a will. and the commitment the resolved that the chairman and i witnessed her in those contact group beating the day was as far as what i told the members of the group they, they remain committed to doing everything they can to generate the additional capabilities. and joining us from nato headquarters in brussels is dw corresponded terry schultz. terry dear c, a heightened resolve among ukraine's allies in response to russia's latest escalation of the war. yes, these recent attacks definitely hung over this meeting of some 50 countries aimed at ramping up weapons deliveries to ukraine. both u. s. defense secretary lloyd austin and joint chiefs chairman, mark, milly, referred to these attacks as potential war crimes and atrocities. the death of noncombatants is something that bothers military officials a lot. so this is certainly a galvanized the members of this ukraine defense contact groups to, to increase the air defenses being sent to ukra

u. s. defense strategy suggests the preemptive little nuclear weapons against nuclear threat contradicting president biden pledges limits. the potential use of newt refused to jeopardize form of livelihood. that's a message from ghana and ivory coast. to avoid crossing a global co production form and protested monthly payments to follow with germany on frogs, molar for the need for the you to hit the fact that what they call unfair economic competition from american switch could reportedly result in a trans atlantic trade will occur very well, welcome to you because dorothy international with the latest world news update is good to have you with us. us, nuclear weapons could be used in a 1st strike against non nuclear threats. that's according to the pentagon, new national defense strategy, which goes against president biden's pledges to make the world safer by restricting the use of nukes we concluded a thorough review of a broad range of options for nuclear declaratory policy, including both for north, 1st use and sole purpose policies and concluded that those approaches would result in

u. s. defense strategy suggests the preemptive launch of nuclear weapons against nuclear threat contradicting president biden pledges can limit the potential use of new refuse to jeopardize a livelihood. a message from ghana and ivory coast to avoid crossing a global co production form. and protested mightily, payments to follow up with germany armstrong to molar for the need for the due to hit the fact that what they call on fat economic competition from american switch could possibly result electrons, atlantic trade war and very well. welcome to you, the facility international with related world news update is good to have you with . no usaa nuclear weapons could be used in a 1st strike against non nuclear threats. that's according to the pentagon, that new national defense strategy, which goes against president biden's, pledges to make the world safer by restricting the use of nukes we concluded a thorough review of a broad range of options for nuclear declaratory policy, including both for north 1st use and saw purpose policies and concluded that those approaches would result in an unacce

u. s. defense system. you can be sure that if there were tons of civilian casualties, ukrainian to be parading the bodies in the streets and they are not now in the united states media, which is behaving in ways much worse than proper shutting down opposition, voices and spreading out now lies you can go back if you'd, if you collected the stories over the last 7 months, where the media was reporting that russia is running out of missiles. i think the last, the last count i saw was like over 60 such stories contrast to the u. s. defense industry, which is designed to cater to a diff, to enriching, if you, well, the defense industry and not necessarily fielding weapon systems that are strategically relevant. or actually tactically function media on this side. the i've taken sort of the rule of thumb, whatever they're reporting, i assume the opposite is true, because they have time and time been proven to be wrong. my code related use a shocking revelation from a top official at pfizer force to admit the the

u. s. defense secretary saying neither remains committed to supporting ukraine . or certainly not a question of lack of a will. and the commitment the resolved that the chairman and i witnessed her in those contact group meeting the day was as far as what i told the members of the group they, they remain committed to doing everything they can to, to generate additional capabilities. either get other or corresponded bent reagan. he is following those meetings, forrest, he joins me now from brussels. ben, it's good to see you. and what is your take did? do you see a heightened resolve among ukraine's allies in response to this latest escalation of the war? by russia, at least you could sense some severe anger and dismay about the recent russian attacks on civilian infrastructure and civilian targets. there was even an was said to lloyd austin, the u. s. defense secretary and, and he made clear that the nato, his now that to supply ukraine with weapon and whatever it needs, not only for weeks or months but years. so a sustainable supply of weapons and ammunition, tha

u. s. defense industry. and to. ready the rest of the world that when it comes to wanting to buy modern weapons that actually work and are proven to work on the battlefield. russia is demonstrating very much that it has that capability. and that the capability of the west is very limited. indeed, and that is interesting that the focus shifts between the strengths as if to add, as if to add, you know, there's a, there's a problem with, with the weapon me, russian. anyway, let's talk a little bit about how things are reported. we try to report here are we want to get both sides of the story and this will be multiple sides of the story. but are we witnessing different ways of reporting in, in the west when it comes, when we talk about the conflicts and ukraine? i'm old enough to remember the weather that the good old days of the battle days of the cold war when the soviets had profit and were notorious for not telling the truth. now it's the united states media, which is behaving in ways much worse than proper shutting

u. s. defense. ready industry which is designed to cater to the, to enriching, if you will, the defense industry and not necessarily fielding weapon systems that are strategically relevant. or actually tactically function media on this side. the i've taken sort of the rule of thumb, whatever the reporting, i assume the opposite is true because they have time and time been proven to be wrong. mike cove, it related news again, a shocking revelation from a top official at pfizer forced to admit the cove in 1900 back. in fact, did not have any testing done on whether it prevented the transmission of the disease. before the pharma company rushed to put the drug to the market, plus the pfizer cove. it vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. regard to the question around, did we know about stopping human is ation before it's sent to the market. now these, you know, we have to really move at the speed of science really understand what is taking place in the mar

the head of the alliance says strengthening ukraine's air defenses is a top priority and the u. s. bowels. the west's military support for kia will not falter, also in the program. fresh attacks on civilian targets in ukraine, missiles, rain down on towns and cities across the country for a 3rd day. ah . hello, i'm terry martin. good to have you with us. we begin in brussels. we're native leaders are considering how to boost ukraine's air defenses, and it's the 1st time the alliance has met since russia illegally annexed several ukrainian territories. last month, secretary general yen stoughton bag says a wave of russian attacks on civilians in recent days or sign of weakness. 50 countries have taken part in a forum setup by the united states to coordinate military aid for keith. u. s. pen secretary says nato remains committed to supporting ukraine. well, certainly it's not a question of like of a will. and the commitment the resolved that the chairman and i witnessed her in his contact group beating the day was as far as what i told the members of the group they, they remain comm

u. s. defense budget, this year mark low over $8000000000.00 of grants and loans to make this possible. and also seems united states is going to engage in joint military training. so i think everybody recognizes a lot more needs to be done. but i think that the ukraine has underscore the value of asymmetrical defense. and i think that taiwan will be pouring more of its efforts in that direction. m. r. o. very aware of roches intentions, as far as ukraine goes and the region. but what about china's intentions? china is of course, holding. it's coming to spotty congress this week. what has leadership doing? ping's speech told us no surprises. i mean, he reiterated was declared in the august white paper and taiwan, that china will not renounce the use of force. and they all take all means necessary to deal with what they refer to as the taiwan problem. but i think that she has seen what can go wrong with pollutants invasion of the ukraine. so i think it probably makes it less likely that he will invade and any concerns from where you are, japan being the 2nd biggest economy in asia and imp

u. s. defense minister lloyd austin said you cranes, victory and lemon would be a strategic headache for russia. seeks to hold off a counter offensive elsewhere. we are very courage by what we're saying right now. we've and sits astride the supply lines of the, of the russians. and they've, they've used those routes to, to, to push men and material down to the south to the west. and without those routes, it'll be more difficult. so this presents a sort of a dilemma for, for the russians going forward. new w correspondent, ne connelly and key of told me that the loss of the mom is a major blow to russian president vladimir putin. not only is it a crucial strategic point in terms of the logistics of russia's invasion of ukraine's. we heard from lloyd austin there. it's just about the optics and the timing. you know, this is just a day after a couple of days after this huge event in moscow in the kremlin, with vladimir putin saying that russia is here to stay, that russia is not gonna budge. and he, we, he, we've seen, you know, the opposite being proved. we've seen ukraine successfully rol

u . s. defense victory, lloyd austin. all it says is the heads of defense departments discuss the situation in ukraine, no mention of a dirty bomb. we didn't have significant. that is we don't know what was discussed in the call. we have nothing from the department of defense either. but they have very much separated the 2 sets of calls out from the russians. but yeah, as you said, it's interesting. we suddenly have 2 phone calls in 3 days between the russian and us defense secretary, up until that point, that hadn't been any communication between the 2 since may the 13th and it was on friday that the us defense secretary called the russian defense secretary. and we were told by the u. s. b and the importance of maintaining lines of communication during the war was emphasized by the u. s. to the russians, but no confirmation got about what was discussed in sunday school. between the u. s . and russian defense secretary, she had a chance to bring this up to date from washington d. c. she had thank you very much. you're goin

u. s. defense strategy also focuses on the rising might of china. the americans say beijing poses the greatest challenge to washington's global influence. we got some reaction and insight from former pentagon senior security policy analyst to michael maloof. while china is that has the 2nd largest economy in the world, and it is basically from the pentagon's perspective. the ultimate quote, threat and quote, and in, in the, in the years to come, because it has ramped up its military development programs. and it has greater numbers of ships than the united states does right now. and i think that between now and 2050 it is projected by the mil sussman offsets pentagon, that it's going to be china, that the u. s. is going to have to deal with as the competitive world power. but the chinese are taking a different tat, which is more like construction and in under developed countries of the world that by itself is a challenge to you as dominance in the world. so we're going to see this as a prolonged conflict competitively, at least for years to come we w

defense strategy is actually not that different because the u. s. is new defense strategy, in fact, does not rule out the use of nuclear weapons against non nuclear threats. it has been tamed. a controversial 1st strike policy that biden earlier suggested wouldn't be needed at a more. so apparently the u. s. president has changed his mind and pentagons new strategy. in fact, looks very similar to what i used to be under trump administration. interesting that the publication of this new strategy was expected. 6 months ago. it was postponed and we only saw it now published exactly after weimer putting speaking at val di, discussion club earlier and thursday explicitly said no to using nuclear weapons. this is what library pollutant had to say which you when you go, then you go and we have never said anything about the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, but only hinted at statements made by the leaders of western countries. liz truss. the recent u. k. prime minister told the press that britain is a nuclear power. it's the prime minister shop to

u. s. defense department to cover the costs of styling which has been crucial to ukraine's gains against russia and built with the support of both german and european funds. could latin america's 1st thermal solar power plant in chile, return the favor by helping the continent when itself off russian fossil fuels. i paid for the woolen lights through business, british politics who are in a mess, but european markets ended the week. iow, british prime minister list trust has fired her finance minister. she also scrapped the key part of their plans, are slashed taxes financed by billions in borrowing, which throttle markets for weeks. they settled somewhat after the bank of england intervened in bond markets, but it stopped purchases on friday. analysts say only a bigger climb down by trust will avert fresh panic. less than 6 weeks in power and british prime minister list process reversals are coming to can fast in a stunning retreat. thrust fire her finance minister across the court tang and then walk to raise the country of corporate tax rate. after promising last month, she wouldn't we

u. s. defense secretary lloyd austin has joined his australian and japanese counterparts in hawaii for security talks. the 3 discussing their support for ukraine. instability in the in the pacific region in light of china is increasingly assertive behavior. their ratings and their supporters have rallied in cities across the globe and solidarity with protest, sparked by the death of money in police, custody, and to run active stadiums. free shoes are taking place nearly 160 cities around the world. i mean, he's death while in custody by iran's, the tories morality police as 4 weeks of unprecedented arrest in iran between of us was military officers who toppled their countries leader paul henry dunbar on friday. so he's now planning a counter offensive. the military also accuses france of helping to amoeba. in a televised address, the army said that the former leader had taken refuge at a french military base or france, which denies the accusations. protestors attacked the french embassy in the capital, the u. s. united nations and the african union and all condemned the 2nd to bring a faster th

u. s. a. money. nearly $10000000000.00 us dollars is going on. a syrian defense ministry has a case as well as carrying out a 3rd strike this week on the sides near damascus. related to talk happened just off the midnight local time with most missiles reported the intercepted by syrian and defenses. no casualties were reported although to private attacks left one soldier wounded various syrian states. so if they say, as well, has hit targets in theory, hundreds of times over the last few years. the most prominent attacks stroke, damascus port in september, killing 3 people in rendering the runway unusable as well has said it targets any sites with connections to iranian military. fighters in syria and has to be an independent journalist based in damascus shed her take on the possible reasons for such as strikes. israel at the moment is trying to effectively take out what it perceives as serious capability, both defense and offense. syria is working on a precision missile program on a suicide drawing mission, and of course iran is helping with technology. so for i

u. s. continues to support ukraine and why they are turning a blind eye to various acts of terrorism in human rights abuses by the crime military. it is profitable to some defense contractors in the u. s. and that's very important to the leaders in washington. i think it's also profitable to the oil and natural gas industry that now wants to sell their wares to europe, trying to displace russia. let's go back to operation paperclip. you know, after world war 2, the u. s. brought over 1100 nazi scientists scale the u. s in the war against the cold war against the soviet union. and the u. s. has been supporting nazis in ukraine for decades. so i mean, this is nothing new and this is not surprising the us. but again, you can't even say there indifferent to nazis in the ukraine. the fact is, the u. s. supports not using it that through immediate praise from worse and media list, while the fire still burned. many headlines thing the bridge was, i'm up most important. russia and also cooling the term start as most of the non calls it then pulls an action forgive. it was also sort of, i didn't key with people taking pictures in front of you, closer to printing the dam

u. s. defense industry as to u. s. senators have proposed an amendment to the annual national defense authorization act, which would open the door for massive munitions purchases to aid ukraine and its conflict with russia. the amendment offers multi year contracts for munitions with companies like lockheed martin. the pentagon would also be able to cooperate with nato allies to buy weapons free crane really to contract. in addition, the bill includes $10000000000.00 and military aid for taiwan over the next 5 years . the senate is expected to vote on the matter in november. the bill, however, has been criticized by some analysts ukraine. age shouldn't be another way for contractors to nickel and dime the pentagon, wasting taxpayer dollars, and undermining the purpose of assistance to support the ukrainian people. but the amendment further deteriorates already weak guardrails in place to prevent corporate price gouging of the military. the u. s. has the highest military budget worldwide, and it has also been the bigg

u. s. defense secretary lloyd austin has a chronic tendency of offering up. so what accounts for the shift may be washington managed to get heave back, ron leash. sometime during the day on saturday. a similar pattern was evident after zalinski called for a nato preemptive strike on russia last thursday. shobel we metal booth it. what should nato do? eliminate the possibility of russia using nuclear weapons. i once again appeal to the international community as it was before february 24th. we need preemptive strikes, so that russia would know what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons. by friday, zalinski was already trying to gaslight every one and pretending that he didn't actually say what he said. and i said you have to do preventive geeks, nada dex. so again, what happened that led zelinski to back pedal on his statement? perhaps he felt the pressure of the western hand that feeds him his endless weapons in cash. but which clearly isn't too keen on having keeps barker, nuclear football match, or actually setting off world war 3. also recall what happen

u. s. defense secretary lloyd austin has a chronic tendency of offering up. so what accounts for the shift may be washington managed to get heave back on leach sometime during the day on saturday. a similar pattern was evident after zalinski called for a nato preemptive strike on russia last thursday. she'll pull when little boy. what should nato do? eliminate the possibility of russia using nuclear weapons. i once again appeal to the international community as it was before february 24th. we need preemptive strikes, so that russia would know what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons. by friday, zalinski was already trying to gaslight every one m pretending that he didn't actually say what he said. and i said you have to do preventive kinks, not a dex. so again, what happened that led zelinski to back pedal on his statement. perhaps he felt the pressure of the western hand that feeds him his endless weapons in cash. but which clear isn't too keen on having t spark a nuclear football match, or actually setting off world war 3. also recall what happened in t

u. s. defense strategy suggests the preemptively launch of nuclear weapons against non nuclear threat contradicting president bindings pledges to limit the potential use of nukes, refused to jeopardize form as livelihoods. that's a message from gone the and ivory coast to avoid crossing a global co production form and protest monthly payments to fall with germany and france. live at the need for the you to head back to what they call on pay economic competition from americans, which could.

u. s. continues to support ukraine and why they are turning a blind to various acts of terrorism in human rights abuses by the ukraine military . it is profitable to some defense contractors in the u. s. and that's very important to the leaders in washington. i think it's also profitable to the oil and natural gas industry that now wants to sell their wares to europe, trying to displace russia. so i'd go back to operation paperclip, you know, after world war 2, the u. s brought over 1100 nazi side to scale the u. s. in the war against the cold war again. so we union and the u. s. has been supporting nazis and ukraine for decades. so, i mean, this is nothing new. and this is not surprising. the us again, you can't even say there indifferent to nazis in ukraine. the fact is, the u. s. supports not quite well the bridge attack drew immediate praise from western media while the fire still burned. by the way, with many headlines saying the infrastructure was of the most important to russia. outlets also labeled a terrorist attack as moscow now calls it an important action for key as well. the deadly incident was also celebrated in kiev, as people took pictures in f

u. s. defense budget raising valid concerns that their activities are not just medical, but military with the luger, the beaudry, georgia is one example that the labradoodle dwayne lawn is looking george's former minister of state security lieutenant general. george gutsy is talking about reliable documents that fell into his hands. knew more sheet music but as reading it or as me surely unless site. but then there. so you know next that omitted in that silly death is jelly, gut order, luna kuk, news s. so misty us lit, ship them proud system. wesley was and you might is, did the thrashing him was plus flinging it be dear me such him of us? las said to labounty into sleep sir. but then the map this below the lift that thing the a but up but it must much in the let us we lenient was do not a jonathan as yacoma left, judy tory, but i didn't you gasoline, you see any more smear? kill noah or rumor? slaymen sham is a problem that ship the company a bit. not still good. the zayden jacob retreats it's smith g, 2 at stevie wedding, b, b t. sheila smith, daniel stun low liver cock whispered cellu

u. s. defense department announced the additional 18 crane estimates at a more than $600000000.00 package, including additional arms, munitions, and equipment, amazon. and meanwhile, the former u. s. army vice chief of staff that said, monetary support for key f is a worthy investment. we've invested and i mean, invested $66000000.00 in ukraine this year. and that's like 1 point, one percent. and what are we getting for that investment? so for $66000000000.00, what we're getting is ukraine is doing the fighting. they are literally destroying the russian army on the battlefield. which would set them back for years and deny them the ability to ever accomplish on the potent, any of his ambitions. in terms of taking back some of the soviet republics. well, according to the former republican virginia, senator richard black, he believes that ne, so in the u. s. are actually using ukraine and ukrainian troops as proxy forces against russia. unfortunately, the united states is very deeply involved in the war we, initially at the outset, we removed the members of the central intelligence agency an

u. s. defense secretary austin, call the russian defense minister, which was accepted. and we understand that austin emphasizes the us, read out the importance of maintaining lines of communication amid the ongoing war and ukraine. so that's, that's, that's good news that the, after these talking to each other, and i asked for sunday school week con, confirm that any, there was any talk about a dirty bomb. the u. s. actually hasn't even confirmed that cool. given any read out. we have a russian read out of the call, which ships to the says the heads of defense to problems, discuss the situation and ukraine. now that's a very different read out from the one that the russians released as regards the calls to the turkish, british, and french defense secretaries where the russian said they discussed the possibility of provocations by your cry and using a dirty bomb in the russian. read out of the conversation with the us defense secretary, they mentioned nothing about a dirty bomb buck. just in the last few seconds, actually, maybe minutes. we've just seen a tweet from the

u. s. defense secretary lloyd austin on the national defense strategy known as the n d s. at the same time, the indie us bluntly describes russia as an acute threat. and we chose award acute carefully, unlike china, russia can't systemically challenge the united states with a long term. but russian aggression does pose an immediate and sharp threat to our interest and values. i want to bring in bradley bowman now he senior director of the center on military and political power at the foundation for the defense of democracies. really, it's good to see you again, secretary austin saying that russia is only an acute threat. me bet. that sounds a little bit, it smacks a little bit of the rock, obama's assertion that russia is only a regional power, is that, is that the message that you're hearing thanks for them to join you. and thanks for the question. you know, the, it's important to know that the original draft of the national defense strategy that was released today was done before february 24th. and in reality, as it often does intervene and it had to be largely rewritten

u. s. defense.

u. s. continues to support ukraine and why they are turning a blind to various acts of terrorism and human rights abuses by the military. it is profitable to some defense contractors in the u. s. and that's very important to the leaders in washington. i think it's also profitable to the oil and natural gas industry that now wants to sell their wares to europe, trying to displace russia. so let's go back to operation paperclip. you know, after world war 2, the u. s. brought over 1100 nazi side to scale the u. s. and the war against the cold war against the soviet union. and the u. s. has been supporting nazis and ukraine for decades. so, i mean, this is nothing new. and this is not surprising. the us again, you can't even say there indifferent to nazis in ukraine. the fact is, the u. s. supports not choosing now the whole bridge attack it did draw praise from western media. with many headlines, citing the importance of the infrastructure to russia. outlets also labeled the attack, an important success for t f and other deadly incident was also celebrating kiev right there. people taking pictures in front of a huge poster that depicting the blast. on the

u. s. defense went to j, suggest the pre emptive launch of nuclear weapons against nuclear threat. contradicting president boynton pledges couldn't mix the potential use of newt with jeff, a guy form of livelihood stuff. a message from gone and ivory coast to avoid crossing a global co production form. and protested monthly payments to follow up with germany armstrong from all over the need for the aid you to hit the fact that what they call on fred economic competition from american express could reportedly result in a trans atlantic trade war.

u. s. defense secretary, they, they actually admitted there's no evidence of an imminent nuclear threat from moscow to ukraine. but what, what we're noticing is, is that the news articles, the press agencies, they don't report that they report fear, fear a nuclear again. why is that the case for several reasons? first of all, this is the way the u. s. is always a waged, it's war is they always have to have a bogeyman and they always have to have an existential threat. they always have to have something which is going to destroy the earth or destroy the order. this is a weapon of mass distraction. we're, we're making people in the west believe that in russia there is some sort of crazy tire, wants that you'd have to crate, destroy the rest of the world. if i were to say, no, that's not really true. then his job here is this extremely important that you don't do the job. be courageous enough. go out there and spread the truth because at the end we just want peace. violent clashes between protesters and police have erupted in the ugandan capital of chem paula. as dozens gather to demonstra

u. s. defense secretary, they, they actually admitted there's no evidence of an imminent nuclear threat from moscow to ukraine. but what we're noticing is, is that the news articles, the press agencies, they don't report that they report fear, fear a nuclear armageddon. why is that the case? for several reasons? first of all, this is the way the u. s. is always a waged, it's wars. they always have to have a bogeyman and they always have to have an existential threat. they always have to have something which is going to destroy the earth or destroy the the order. this is a weapon. busy massive distraction, we're, we're making people in the west believe that in the russia there is some sort of crazy tire, wants to eat up ukraine and this for the rest of the world. if journalists were to say, no, there's not really true. and his job would be at risk with mythics truly important . that real john, it do the job be created to go out there and spread the truth. because at the end we just want peace investigations into the north stream. pipelines damage are being hindered by danish and swedish

u. s. defense secretary, they, they've actually admitted there's no evidence of an imminent nuclear threat from moscow to ukraine. but what, what we're noticing is, is that the news articles, the press agencies, they, they don't report that they report fear, fear a nuclear again. why is that the case for several reasons. first of all, this is the way the u. s. is always a waged, it's wars, they always have to have a bogeyman and they always have to have an existential threat. they always have to have something which is going to destroy the earth or destroy the order. this is a weapon of mass distraction. we're, we're making people in the west believe that in russia there is some sort of crazy fire. was that you'd have to create a destroy the rest of the world. if julius were to say no, it's not really true, then his job with your wrist with this. it's truly important that real joiners, do the job be courageous enough. go out there and spread the truth because at the end we just want peace. kiev is ready to hand over full control of its intended russian targets to the united states in excha

u. s. defense industry, which is designed to cater to a diff, to enriching, if you, well, the defense industry and not necessarily fielding weapon systems that are strategically relevant. or actually tactically function media on this side. the i've taken sort of the rule of thumb, whatever they're reporting, i assume the opposite is true because they have time and time been proven to be wrong. the washington lawmakers have consequences for saudi arabia and under calling for a reevaluation of their countries relations with re add, it comes out to a global cartel of oil producing countries led by the kingdom and russia decided to slush oil production despite us goals to increase it our t corresponded marina cost rivers being taking a closer look at the people on the global energy market. washington is once again throw in a hand from because it's now getting what it wants. and what does the us do when it switches are ignored? it resorts to threats and intimidation. there's going to be some consequences for what they've done with russia. what kind of consequences manenda says suspend all arm sales

u. s. defense intelligence agency, document of 2012. we set a solid entity regional countries allied to the united states are trying to create a solid cas entity between syrian rock while who, what is that, what was that entity? it was isis. and then general flynn at that time said that the that they were determined and the united states allow for that entity. okay. you know, i don't know know that and let me question, let me finish. let me finish. not a lecture, let them know that me finish. i asked you to share. you don't want them done that in a private conversation, you're afraid you're very want. you're afraid questions go ask your question. my, my well, you're right. my question for, you know, we lead back on damascus. that could have been a different approach by the gum. yeah. to this on rescue that like the one suggested by 5, leading it right. in economist earlier this month, who said the authorities should listen to the demonstrators and prepare for fundamental change. is there anybody inside the government who is preparing fo