kozlovska worked with him different ministries for more than 20 years, and in fact it becomes the maineficiary of such a draft law, when it creates a corruption window for the minister, unlimited powers without any we know how they bear responsibility. the ministry of regions does not respond to any letters from the union of architects. that is why these people gathered, ms. olena shulyak. she worked in a prepared business, and probably still works now. for some reason, the union of architects , personally, that we are some kind of corrupt people, i don’t know , i don’t have any offshore companies, for example, that’s why the people who gathered together with the confederation of builders of ukraine, which has the largest number of e-e builders, even more influential, they got together and wrote a bill for themselves

kozlovska worked with him in various ministries for more than 20 years, and in fact she becomes the main beneficiary of such a project law, when it creates a corruption window for the ministry, unlimited powers without any responsibility. does not correspond at all to why these people gathered, ms. olena shulyak , she worked for an already ready-made business, apparently, and now works has offshore, er, foreign, yes, this is open information, and at the same time, they are accused of something the union of architects, personally, that we are some kind of corrupt people, i don’t know, i don’t have any offshores, for example , that’s why the people who gathered together with the confederation of builders of ukraine, which has the largest number of developers, even more influential ones, gathered and wrote a bill for themselves, all the others, during this process there were no involvement could be involved only somehow formally for a tick to show that someone was there, then they wrote that the association of cities was involved in one of the letters, but we see the reaction associations n

kozlovska, she also said that there is an understanding that somewhere they have pulled the blanket a little to the other side and there is an understanding that this is still necessary regulate, but from the very beginning, this person has ideas about where the monopolization of the e-e market of the construction market is, respectively, to finalize it either by regulatory acts or to introduce e-e to introduce additional amendments to the law a little later, but it was necessary to start from her point of view again i already noted that we could, after all, for two weeks, we waited perfectly and for an additional two or three weeks, we could read to move, it just raises a fuss for the whole world, and it is quite natural that they write that they were not allowed to attend the online meeting. even the proposals sent to the committee, we know the movement. honestly, that is, it is not just some air bubble, you know, it is a structure that works carefully and really, and here there were, well, how they write real violations of the relevant procedures, in particular, what concerns publi