ipcc reports and we have to go by zero — ipcc reports and we have to go by zero emissions _ ipcc reportsnd we have to go by zero emissions by 2050, - ipcc reports and we have to go by zero emissions by 2050, so| by zero emissions by 2050, so if you — by zero emissions by 2050, so if you want— by zero emissions by 2050, so if you want to _ by zero emissions by 2050, so if you want to do _ by zero emissions by 2050, so if you want to do that - by zero emissions by 2050, so if you want to do that by- if you want to do that by 2040, you have — if you want to do that by 2040, you have two _ if you want to do that by 2040, you have two definitely - if you want to do that by 2040, you have two definitely remove all the — you have two definitely remove all the conl— you have two definitely remove all the coal power— you have two definitely remove all the coal power plants, - all the coal power plants, which _ all the coal power plants, which 620 _ all the coal power plants, which 620 countries - all the coal power plants, i which 620 countries agreed, all the coal power plants, - which 620 count

i actually feel if you really. want to respect the climate targets based on the ipcc| reports and wesions by 2050, so if you want to do that. by 2040, you have to definitely remove all the coal—power - plants, which the 620 countries all agreed, i and then the transport sector — it's not only the energy, - electricity, but the transport sector. i i think we are very much behind these targets at the moment. l one of the reasons is that| although there was a huge advocacy from the civil society and the experts in sri lanka, l to ceylon electricity board to change their long—term generation plan, to bring more and more renewable energy, . that did not happen— because they're on coal buyers. so i think that was — - that is one of the problems still. now, we are slowly moving. into the wind and solar power, but i think we need rapid i investment in these sectors if we want to really... yeah, but you're not going to get that rapid investment given the economic crisis here in the country... exactly. ..when people are struggling to put food on the table, right? so he's not given the governme

ipcc. don't you think it's time they administration has an honest conversation on spending trillions of dollars, and ideas that according to the u.n. ipcc aren't working? >> thank, you congresswoman. i certainly do. i see a sound and serious climate policy as having a foundation, like a house has a foundation. and the quality of the foundation will determine whether the house is safe to build in and live in and so forth. the foundation ought to be de-politicized, a transmission of science to not experts like all of us. the concern with the ipcc reports, and the summary for policymakers, is that folks who are decoding the complicated climate science and explaining it to all of us are government officials. they don't have the rigorous peer review and requirements to be transparent like you do with actual climate science. i respectfully suggest that perhaps your side of the aisle, make it very clear, you embrace climate science, the problem is not climate science. it's how it's transmitted to

so clearly if we get on to how they police themselves, we have the ipcc , themselves, we have the ipccthere's independent body and of course you've got one force. i understand, looking into another and i think they're going to have to rethink how they do that perhaps. i mean , i they do that perhaps. i mean, i think very difficult for think it's very difficult for civilians to come from outside who want nothing to do with the police and we've got a group of people to go by. you need to judge what these two police officers did. well we don't know the outs of the job. we the ins and outs of the job. we know can see. we're not know what we can see. we're not stupid. of i would stupid. so of course, i would imagine you'd have to have imagine that you'd have to have very people who were very trained people who were trained police officers that were these things, were looking into these things, which right. it which is quite right. but it then looks at how is the then it looks at how is the accountability? this accountability? i mean, this particular how somebody particular case, how somebod

we know that data was rigged and they knew it the to this is that the global warming community the ipcc knows their science is fragile they know it is completely distorted and for instance, the last point i would make on i agree with mark, we've got to fight fundamental premises. i just wrote an article in the american thinker on this hurricane that just occurred in in florida because, again, michael mann was out there saying this is climate change, global warming, well, in fact, even on the noah website, which our, you know, astronomical basically measuring all the weather media all this has a long article will probably be taken after i wrote about it. i made sure to capture it. so i proof what he wrote is that there is no proof. there is evidence which would link hurricanes with carbon dioxide that the argument is just not enough of it and it is the power is not sufficient. the last point i want to make is people need to understand that the function of the weather is to distribute heat, the nature of the earth's tilt. the sun hits us at the and so the is blessed with this on which we

you're looking at, i think the number the ipcc using the ipcc numbers have to spend £1,000,000,000,000ree that the child. the climate is changed by so there's virtually no benefit to be had by spending at the moment we're about 20 billion per annum directly that's imposed by law . we need that's imposed by law. we need an otherwise spend that be spent productively rather than wastefully on things like heat pumps and, electric cars and, about 60 billion indirectly is the number that i have. so why would we be spending all money? not we want to, but because we're told to. by law it's behaviour change, which means we'll make a well. you are going to say. what a lovely, lovely to be here with you. but honestly you are talking out of your head . you're really on the money which was promised . and in 2015 which was promised. and in 2015 was a hurriedly us dollars a target which they had to get you know how much we spend dealing with code. we spent $400 billion on dealing with . then you might on dealing with. then you might well have a question . if you well have a question. if you were scep