general david petraeus, always good to have you on. >> thanks, jim.e warned repeatedly that a 6-year-old who shot his teacher, warned that he had a gun at school. that's according to the teacher who was shot. why were so many warnings on that day ignored? inspire? no mask? no hose? just sleep. learn more, and view important safety i informatin at inspiresleep.com ♪3, 4♪ ♪ ♪hey♪ ♪ ♪ar♪are you ready♪ me ♪e you ready♪ ♪ ♪ wow, we're crunching tons of polygons here! what's going on? where's regina? hi, i'm ladonna. i invest in invesco qqq, a fund that gives me access to the nasdaq-100 innovations, like real time cgi. okay... yeah... oh. don't worry i got it! become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq ♪ at morgan stanley, we see the world with the wonder of new eyes, ♪ helping you discover untapped possibilities and relentlessly working with you to make them real. ♪ because grit and vision working in lockstep ♪ puts you on the path to your full potential. ♪ hi, susan. honey. yeah. i respect that. but that cough looks pretty bad. try this robitussin hon

earlier this afternoon i spoke with retired general david petraeus, the former director of the cia. send for the united states to press allies to provide tanks to ukraine when it won't do the same? >> an unhelpful message i think at this point, wolf. look, there are understandable reasons for not wanting to give the m1 abrams tank, the u.s. main battle tank. it's much hefbian than the others. it's a good ten times heavier than the german tank. it's much more difficult to maintain. it's a jet engine basically a turbine surrounded by armor. the spare parts and all the rest of that, the diagnostics are very, very challenging. that said if giving 14 tanks, say armored company's worth of tanks to ukraine allows the germans to provide their tanks and to approve that other countries have poland, baltic states, finland and other states of nato that have those, i think it's very much worth it. and i think it's time to get on with this, frankly. this is another one of those pivotal moments in ukraine. the battle lines have been pretty static. russia has been making incremental gains at great

general petraeus said the exact same thing. what is the story behind the changed mind? they wanted to show they were on the side with germany and the united states is willing to fill that and what might make a difference an understanding of the military, it's complex why they change their mind. >> thank you very much. just hours before, the german chancellor gave the go-ahead to be delivered. initially, germany plans to provide training and maintenance. >> will provide ukraine with tanks. many criticize them for dragging their feet but he defended the timing. >> i want to say it's right we do not allow ourselves be forced into action but instead focusing on close cooperation and continuing it. berlin will deliver tanks. >> this is not just about any weapon. >> details will be discussed with other allies to send tanks. >>, stood the decision depend on the german chancellor? >> he came to the parliament to make this announcement and presented it as part of this coalition, alliance of european countries were able to step up, direct military support for you and. cooperation

enroll petraeus famously -- general petraeus gave his confidant significant classified information that she should not have had access to. and he was sort of let off with a slap on the wrist. lots of people have removed a single document and been severely criminally punished. those are cases where they did it with intent, so we have a lot of information to learn about the particular president biden back when he was vice president or former vice president. and the members of congress, they knowingly remove this information, they could be subject to come in a prosecution or at least they will be investigated and there will be a determination as to whether it was serious enough to warrant prosecution. host: professor, to clarify something, executive order that obama -- giving him this classifying powers -- the classifying powers? ms. hathaway: the president sits on top of this whole thing and has the power to make decisions and relegate down decision to declassify information. so he could delegate that information to the vice president to declassify information but generally, there is a pr

case, when general petraeus disclosed top secret, covert information to his biographer, he was charged with a misdemeanor. >> i got to say, if you walk back in time, you would not think that document retention practices would play quite essential, dramatic role they played in american politics from 2015 on, but here we are. jameel jaffer, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> coming up, the georgia prosecutor investigating donald trump say decisions are eminent, her words. today's big's hearing will be heard soon next. me wishes do come true. and it turns out the general is a quality insurance company that's been saving people money for nearly 60 years. for a great low rate, and nearly 60 years of quality coverage- go with the general. i'm jonathan lawson here to tell you about life insuranceverage- through the colonial penn program. if you're age 50 to 85, and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three ps. what are the three ps? the three ps of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, an

petraeus and burger intentionally took, disseminated or altered documents. they pleaded guilty.nadvertently and returned and he didn't have to face criminal liability. so that really is, amara a key lynch pin of these types of cases. >> and again, you know, people continue to see -- make comparisons between trump's handling of classified documents versus president biden's handling of documents. look, both of them now have special counsels investigating their handling of these documents, both their private homes, residences were searched by the fbi. but of course, you have one side that's been at least on the surface cooperative, while a search warrant had to be executed at trump's mar-a-lago residence. what do you find more significant, the parallels or the differences between trump and biden? >> from a legal standpoint the differences are more important. it's sort of like one person is driving down the highway too rapidly, is pulled over for speeding and asked for his license and registration and cooperates. the other is driving down the highway, recklessly driving, he gets pul

general petraeus took things home, you have sandy burger that stuffed things in his socks.o is this the rule or not? why can't these folks who we elect behave in a way that adheres to them? >> well, let's break that down. general petraeus was pros cueded for turning over classified information. he made a mistake. he was prosecuted turning over information to a reporter. sandy berger put classified information in his sock. so yes. here's what i believe when it comes to presidents. the idea of prosecuting a president regarding mishandling classified information is problematic. they have the right to declassify. i'm calling for a special counsel. the point is you need a special counsel to investigate the biden mishandling episode if you're going to do the same for trump. >> martha: senator, thank you. senator lindsey graham, always good to have you with us. it would be great if people abided by the rules. think i they how old the have secret service men look at everything. thanks, senator. good to see you today. all right. here's another issue when it comes to these ethical is

case, when general petraeus disclosed top secret, covert information to his biographer, he was charged with a misdemeanor. >> i got to say, if you walk back in time, you would not think that document retention practices would play quite essential, dramatic role they played in american politics from 2015 on, but here we are. jameel jaffer, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> coming up, the georgia prosecutor investigating donald trump say decisions are eminent, her words. today's big's hearing will be heard soon next. heard soon next. aaaaaah. got it. earn big with chase freedom unlimited. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. >> tech: cracked windshield? make it easy how do you cashback? and schedule with safelite, because you can track us and see exactly when we'll be there. >> woman: i have a few more minutes. let's go! >> tech vo: that's service that fits your schedule. go to safelite.com. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ i have moderate to severe crohn's disease. now, there's skyrizi. ♪ things are looking up ♪ ♪ i've got symptom relief ♪ ♪ contr

whistleblowers, for comparison , were sentenced to 5 years in just one document, while biden trump clinton petraeusthese guys have tens of hundreds of documents. no prison republicans create a question, and when will searches begin at the incumbent president and write a letter to address of attorney general marik garland, assures that the special prosecutor's office should investigate the biden case , if you are listening to the attorney general, if you felt it necessary to appoint a special lawyer in relation to the president trump case, then when it comes to working with classified information, you should do the same in relation to president biden, the american press. she reported that the first part of the secret documents forgotten by biden included intelligence data and materials from briefings about ukraine and earlier and great britain, they were drawn up from 2013 to 2016. opponents of the head of state are sure that this case should be the starting point for disclosing all the facts, and the president of the university of pennsylvania became the us ambassador to germany because of the corr

comparison , reality-winor was judged for 5 years in just one document, meanwhile biden trump clinton petraeusuments no prison republicans create a question, and when searches begin at the incumbent president and write letters to the attorney general marik garland, assures that the special prosecutor should investigate the biden case, if you are listening to the attorney general, if you considered it necessary to appoint a special lawyer, in relation to the president's case trump, then when it comes to dealing with classified information you should do the same with president biden the american press. she reported that in the first part of biden's forgotten secret documents were intelligence data and materials from briefings about ukraine and earlier and the uk, they were compiled from 2013 to 2016, the opponents of the head of state are sure that this case should be the starting point for disclosing all the facts, and the president of the university of pennsylvania became the ambassador of the corrupt ties of the biden clan usa in germany people like the secretary of state the current presiden

population, please. that it was obvious that ukraine can fight ballistic missiles only with the help of petraeus petri as soon as possible to close the sky. it is precisely because of the ballistic missile strikes against iran that there is such a feeling that the sanctions, which are getting bigger and bigger, he has are exerting effective pressure on iran, this does not mean that iran has finally given up and will refuse to cooperate with russia, but it means that there are more contradictions and contradictions within the iranian ruling class. and this is the position of the ruling group of the islamic guard corps revolutions and such lyrical krilikal radical group led by the supreme leader oleg me and ibrahimraisi, but they can be undermined. yes, that is, in principle, it is in our favor, because any disagreements inside iran, they contribute to the victory of the future. i hope for the iranian revolution which will put an end to this regime . well, it will put an end to cooperation between iran and russia in general, and as long as this exists, of course, these attempts to restore or conti

remember, david petraeus got in a lot of trouble for sharing classified information with someone thatng as to what is is the contents of this these documents? >> carley: feels like the popular opinion when all is said and done neither president biden or former president trump are going to face any sort of legal ramifications for this or be indicted whatsoever. one within a sells out the other. but if regular american mishandled classified documents, the outcome would be much different. how do you feel about that? >> it's true. carley, one of the problems we have a system that no one is above the law but we do see these examtion where it appears that people do get away at the highest levels with things that their employees and underlings would never get away with. we're going to watch, i think, whether or not these two special counsels coordinate, talk about the law, what the law should be and how to apply it to these facts because ultimately. it's the same exact statutes. and i thought the donald trump case is actually more sympathetic because as a president he had the ability to decl

and, you know, as you say, there have been a bunch of people, john deutsche, david petraeus took classified documents. they both were prosecuted for it. obviously it's a little more complicated. it's even more complicated with biden because, as we saw during the trump term, once you're the president you can't be criminally prosecuted according to justice department rules, so he would seem protected there. but if you're merrick garland and you're a very careful, judicious -- he was a judge -- attorney general, you have to make a decision at some point and it's going to be him, not the special counsel, do you bring charges against donald trump. you've got to know that he's going to figure into that, factor into that. we've also got a special prosecutor looking at joe biden. the circumstances are different, the cooperation is different, but it does make it awfully hard to do one and not the other. >> before we move on, and you know we've got to go quickly because we have a time issue, but how do you think -- what do you think of the handling, how the biden administration is handling this and k

so general petraeus talks about this move from benign globalization to one of great power competition does that mean for markets? you will have more resiliency of the supply chains, water, data, and transportation and that is awkward. our base view, i think it is a realistic thesis. the fed has a hard time hitting 2% and we bounce around a lot more. i do not think it is the 1970's, but the great moderation we had where central banks will give you visibility, that is gone. alix: you are talking about a longer-term thesis than just wage and service inflation. we did see a chart about liquidity in the market and how much it has dried up. is that opening up a bit and what does that mean for you? henry: i love that chart. we track that because it tells you whether people are over or under supplying the market. right now they are under supplying. you want to be an investor or provider of liquidity while that is happening. the good news is that we need a functioning global capital market and we are starting to see that. so as the banks clear that will take place. you are seeing some deals wh

petraeus also prosecuted under this statute. he took them and gave them to his biographer who he was having a relationship with and they determined the dissemination tipped it over to criminal. all of these things are what the special counsel has to look at before he can determine whether this is inadvertent, nonintentional, not willful, therefore not criminal or whether it implicates criminal law that requires the national security section and him collectively to make a determination does this fit in the norms of prosecution. >> all really good points to compare. people forget. they think this is only beginning with trump's alleged mishandling or confirmed mishandling and think this is a confined universe of this never happens. of course it goes back to the idea of why is this consistently happening? i keep going back to the moment, if it were a trial in a criminal trial you would have problems getting into evidence that which you could not show had a chain of custody that preserved the integrity of the evidence. you have custo

director petraeus learned the hard way. >> mistakes i made. as i did in the past i apologize to those closest to me and to many others, including those with whom i was privileged to serve in government and in the military over the years. >> right now former president trump is arguing his powers of declassification when he was president were nearly mythical. >> president biden: there doesn't have to be a process as i understand it. different people say different things. if you're the president of the united states you can declassify by saying it's declassified even by thinking about it. >> at issue for the former and current presidents now is how far that presidential prerogative extends under u.s. law. and also in the court of public opinion. can the commander-in-chief be excused more violating national security policy. this is the decision before the d.o.j. and before american voters. >> bill: when we get an answer we wait on that. gillian turner in d.c. what's next. >> dana: major courtroom developments in the case of bryan kohberger. why he

that's a famous question that david petraeus posed during the iraq war.situation we're in right now. how does the war end when you're fighting against the world's largest nuclear power. maria: what do you think? how does it end? >> well, i think there are two big possibilities if you rule out escalation into the disaster scenario that we're talking about. one is that we find some sort of negotiated compromise and that's something that very many people in the west contemplate. the other possibility is this war just grinds on in an unsettled stalemate for a long time to come and we have what is essentially an open wound in europe that radiates instability for years to come and one that leaves ukraine essentially destroyed as a result and that's not a good scenario either. so we're going to have to wrestle with some very hard questions. maria: you know, george, this is also happening at a time that the united states is facing debt at 120% of gdp. you know that the congress is going to have a real showdown in the coming months when the u.s. exhausts all oppor

general petraeus, when he was in central command, i was on the armed services committee, he said, the most important question to ask in any conflict is how does this end? i don't think we know how it ends. putin is ready to grind the ukrainians into submission as long as he can. he is ready to outlast the west in terms of our support commitment to helping ukrainians. i am not sure that we know how it ends. i do not believe that it is our job to tell ukrainians, you must take this deal, you have to take this deal or we will pull the plug. i do not think that is appropriate. that is something that we ought to -- the ukrainians need to take the lead on. hal: you brought up the defense industrial use of this question. one of the reasons why the tanks have become so prominent is ukraine and the countries supporting ukraine are running short on artillery rounds. as inspiring as ukrainian resistance has been, western support has been, it also seems to have revealed some shortcomings and the ability of western countries, including the united states, to sustain protracted conflicts that consum

>> martha: this is the problem look at sandy berger, general petraeus, donald trump, look at joe biden, they all i would imagine no it is and everybody does this kind of thing. either this is an indictable offense and it breaks the law, or it doesn't. we need to live in a country where people understand what the law is. and when you are leaving your office it is very clear, sir, ma'am, let's go through every single one of these boxes because you do not want to break the law and be caught with these things in your private office ever. but the problem is you know it's always qualified. it wasn't important, it's a small amount, either it's legal or it's illegal. the other thing i don't like about the story so far is that people are saying well this is going to take the political winds away from the former president because now this president also has this to be concerned about. no. two wrongs do not make a right. that would suggest if they both did it somehow it doesn't matter. you know? maybe i'm being overly purist here, but i was raised to think rules are rules. and here is hillary cli

, what was found at mar-a-lago, whether justified or not with donald trump, seen it with general petraeussandy berger, hiding documents in his socks, there is a history of this craziness? why is that? why are these documents so spread out, even institutions that have control of them don't even know where they are or get late wind, oh, this one is missing? >> well, right. that is what we learned about the donald trump case, there was a law, they were looking forespecific documents missing. in joe biden's case doesn't seem there was any log. these were purloined out of the white house without anybody knowing. i know when i handled classified documents i never kept them on my desk. made sure they were in the scif. certainly didn't take them home. i'm surprised how calf clear joe biden was as vice president, would have them within boxes with his corvette in his garage in wilmington. you either apply the rules the same or you end up with this two-tiered system of justice where the biden administration appears to want to go after donald trump. they will use any means necessary. now it has blown

i want to go now to the former cia director and retired army general david petraeus. thank you for your time. we were watching the and talking but ukraine wants 3 to 400 tanks but they getting about 100 of the combined, also with leopards, each of which have their own attributes. 31 abrams and 80 leopards, then the uk also sending challenger tanks. so, you look at what's been promised. what does it mean? how significant does that change the battle? >> is huge is significant. and symbolically, the next step is being taken. it is very significant substantively. on the battlefield, the take is the centerpiece of combined arms operations, which are what will be necessary to have successful offensives this summer. maybe late spring by ukraine. to take back, to liberate more of the territory that russia has occupied since 24 february. the tank is a piece of which everything else will be built. fighting vehicles, already providing those. training them in germany. there will be artillery, we provide a lot of that. air defense, engineers, electronic warfare. eod, drones out fr

general david petraeus pleaded guilty in 2015 to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified documents. he was sentenced to two years probation, reality winner got five years. sandy berger fined and sentenced to two years probation. there didn't seem to be any hesitation with regards to these people regarding what they did with classified documents. at this point, donald trump is a civilian. why is he not treated like every person who is accused of taking and holding classified documents illegally? >> let's be realistic here. there are going to be different results depending on the facts and circumstances. the other thing everyone loses sight of is that every prosecutor has a discretion to charge the case and to prosecute the case in the manner that he or she deems appropriate. you may have a prosecutor that's extremely aggressive, and moves forward in a much more rapid pace, seeking perhaps even harsher penalties than another prosecutor. it's all a matter of discretion. that doesn't mean someone is getting unequal justice as opposed to someone else. that's just the way that our system

if you remember the general petraeus case, he had a secured compartment facility in his house, logs wereng kept. that is biden's choice. we will not get access to see who was in his property at the time. that does not make it acceptable to have the classified information at that location. neil: ron, another question i have for you, i know one of the chief lawyers for the president, did get to the house, the delaware home to sort of look at what might have been there now. he apparently had clearance, i understand, to look at top secret documents but we don't know whether the lawyers and i assume they were lawyers, that they brought with him did. is that a big deal? >> well certainly it is. my understanding is that richard sauber, president biden's attorney had the ability to review the information and transport it to the department of justice or the fbi. the other lawyers if they did not have security clearance they would have obligation to stop as soon as they saw those record records. i'm assuming that is what they called sauber in the first place to handle transportation of the records

as opposed to say army general petraeus or national security adviser sandy berger, both of those guysnts intentionally, then failed to cooperate fully with the government when they were asking for them. both had to plead guilty to misdemeanor mishandling of the documents. so in the case of biden versus trump, the point of cooperation by biden and apparent lack of cooperation by trump will weigh on the prosecutors, each of them separately, determination about criminal intent. >> i think it's sort of interesting, president biden's personal lawyers, personal staff, who found these different series of documents, right? so now that there's a special counsel appointed, are his personal attorneys prohibited from searching for more documents? what happens now that there's a special counsel? >> well, i would think that the personal lawyers will continue their searches. they want to be in full cooperation mode with the special counsel. and they want to make sure that the special counsel understands that as far as they're concerned, the taking of these documents was inadvertent and immediately u

general petraeus.'s a pattern to this that those that would be keeping track of documents that are missing aren't. >> yes, there's some gaps in the system. in theory there's a system in place. the archives in theory know what's classified documents exist, they have a checklist and they can check it off. >> neil: but there's a lot of them. quite a few of them to your point. easier said than done. >> it's humongous. it's like the final scene of raiders of the lost arc. it's a hard job of keeping track of the documents. >> neil: someone else has a whip and someone has a gun. but let me ask you about this whole process though. when someone is taking obviously what they know to be classified documents, that already is breaking the law, is it not? or is it cleared, maybe someone is doing a book or researching, they borrow them. what are the rules on this? >> sure. well, it's definitely breaking the rules if they take classified documents out of the government's custody when they become a private citizen. the

former army general petraeus took documents that were classified, gave them to his biographer, and was, had to plead guilty to crimmina mishandling because of the dissemination. similarly, former national security adviser sandy berger took documents, when they asked about them he altered them. he, too, had to plead guilty. so legally speaking, what is distinguishing in all of these cases is, once they were revealed -- and there's no explanation other than error for both trump and, i think, biden's initial mishandling. once identified what do they do? and then what did the prosecutor find was done with those documents? i think in the biden case, it will turn out that he was just sloppy and that he was -- >> is that a defense when it comes to top secret, classified information? >> well -- >> like, what a lower-level employee who was sloppy, put it this way -- if there was a lower-level employee who worked at cia, was sloppy and took home top secret national security classified information, would that lower-level aide be able to say, oh, well, i was sloppy. would that be a good defense? >

i'm remembering general petraeus and documents, sandy berger, stuffing documents in a sock, whatever it was. there's a history of this, and very little punishment meteed out for it, a misunderstanding, or they didn't know, depending on the document in question. we don't know, but we know it was classified. then distinctions, it was not classified at the moment, or it was classified at the moment, but should any of that matter? i mean, these are documents you shouldn't have. >> it absolutely matters. if a document is classified, it needs to be treated with the control -- you never know what's in these documents. >> neil: right. >> i mean, it could be giving away operations internationally. it could be giving away the identities of people who could be at risk if their identities are disclosed. you need to treat everyone -- it's not like, well, it's kind of classified. it's classified or it's not. if it is, it needs to be treated with strict control. >> neil: if it isn't -- here we go again with this. you know, the punishment that could be meted out, is anyone's guess. you go to jail fo

none of these instances in the biden document case, the trump document case, i could go back to the petraeus document case and even in the, you know,. sandy berger, you know, hiding some in his sock, i think, at the time, the national archives wasn't the one that discovered these missing documents. and they're the repository for all of this. that's what's disturbing. >> yeah, that's right, neil. and, you know, to the extent they're not the repository for categories of classified information, that's held by the intelligence agencies under very secure conditions. and even, you know, current presidents and top officials of the government, hair security -- their security clearances give them access to this information, but they're still to bligeed to hold it and safeguard it -- obliged to hold it and safeguard it in the man the law requires. even presidents they have a situation room in the white house because he was to have a secure place to discuss classified things. and other people who get to handle classified information in the government have to handle it in places that the government east

i do remember general petraeus is head of central amman years ago when i was on the armed services committeehe said the most important question to ask if any conflict is how does this end? i don't think we know how it ends. for putin he is ready to grind the ukrainians into submission as long as he can. he is ready to outlast the west in terms of our support commitment to helping the ukrainians. and i am not sure we know how it ends. i do not believe it's our job to tell ukrainians you must take this deal. you have to cut this deal or we will pull the plug on our support. i do not think that is appropriate. thatat is something -- the ukrainians need to take the lead on. >> you brought up the defense industrial base. maybe we should go there now. one of the reason why the debate has become so prominent is that ukraine as a country supporting ukraine are running short of utility ground needed in a conflict. as inspiring as ukrainian resistance has been in western support for your crate have been, it also seems to have revealed some shortcomings in the ability of western including the united st

i said that's a great idea which it was until general dean petraeus, the former head of the cia used that trick that is in my book to cheat on his wife with his mistress and ed my buddy and i said, that's the thing that you gave me. you have to give me a better one, the guy just used it. he got a better one, the one in the book, i didn't make it up either, it's real. and obviously that is the fun of the book. and to me, exploring the characters are really the best part of it. we are supposed to talk amongst ourselves but i will say, i will ask the first question. i will say to that, when you are writing like someone like sandy who you wrote 20, 30 years ago and now you are writing your newest character who clearly is an outcast, nothing like rusty was and presumed innocent? talk about it, it's fascinating, i read those books in the 1990s and here we are in a whole different world but it, please. >> pinky is 40 years younger than oil. she is female. she is by. it was a reach to write about her. and i was afraid of getting clobbered with charges of cultural appropriation or something l

i said, that's a great idea, which it was until general petraeus, the former head of the cia use that trick that's in my book to cheat on his wife with his mistress and i called my buddy and i'm like that's the thing you gave me you got to give me a better one. now, the guy just used and he's like, i'll give you a better one. i got a better one for you. so the one you see in the book, i won't ruin that. but you'll see, i didn't make it up either. it's real. and obviously that's the fun, the book. and to me, you know, exploring the characters are really the part of it and i'll use that. we were supposed to talk amongst ourselves, but i'll, i will say i'd love to. i'll ask first question. we're going to ask each other questions. don't know what we're going to ask, but i'll say to that, when you're writing someone, sandy, who you wrote when you were you, know, 20, 30 years ago and now you're writing a character, your newest character who clearly is an outcast, is nothing like rusty was and presumed innocent. know i know you can see you already got your answer. i mean, no, i talk about it

as for petraeus colorsed, as you point out, she co-founded the black lives matter movement. but of course, she als o stepped down after it was revealed that she went on a multi-million dollar real estate buying spree while this is her cousin we're talking about here and of hisof death, she said he was, quote, h killed by police. " >> laura , kevin , thank you. now, the ethos driving these racial arsonists is the subject of a famous disagreement. and the new book titled thi the real race revolution. in it, author alfredo ortiz goes back to a debate between two 20th century black thought leaders wbb dubois and bookerboa t washington. now, duboinds argued thatd activism and political power were the best way fowerer black americans to attain racial equality and that capitalism was inherently racist. while booker t . whil washington believed that black americans should harness the power of capitalismon to become economically independent. >> well, the author of thatarnes book, alfredo ortiz, joins me now. alfredo, your book is amazing. first of everyone needs to reads it, but yo t

e evid overwthe evidence was ovg if you're going to prosecute david petraeus, sandy berger, john deutch and people in the military for far less, it was a terrible injustice, nott to bring a case against hillarya clinton. but, you know, james comey didme this unbelievable legal pirouette and so said a d no prosecutor would bring such a case. every prosecutor in america i would have loved to have bringwo brought such an easyul case. b. >> all right.more thank you both, professor. thank you, greg jarra. thank you. more big news tonight. biden's right hand man, ron klain, will soon be leaving the white house. so the timing is perfect.ng i according to reports, biden'snd brain is leaving and his former covid czar, jeff zients, will replace him. that's right. y ththe guy that oversaw biden's infamous dark winter oawf severn illness and death will soon be running the administration. >> god help us now. science is , of course, a big time champion of vaccine mandates, covid boosters, even though the latest variants don't show would work at all.n h >> the same shots that have utterly failed to li

he didn't like petraeus because he thought petraeus worked out too much.hool that he weighed when trump was talking to him, and no secretary of state could be that drawn. i'm serious. >> i watched this conversation in awe. >> this is shocking. >> he was obsessed with how much he worked out and thought that somehow it didn't look manly enough, like you need to not care so much. >> right. and so all of this leads up of course to a conversation, and this is the general talked about all of this with you. it led to a conversation about nikki haley, why he didn't want nikki haley to be secretary of state or vice president. >> what trump said, so trump is throwing around different possibilities for replacement of tillerson and pence, even as far back as 2018, talking about whether he could replace pence. and in discussing that, he says, well, you know, what do you think about nikki haley, he throws out in the oval office. and what trump says is that she doesn't look good for me. and he complains about her blotchy complexion and saying that, you know, because of h

exercise their prosecutorial prosecutorial -- there hasn't been criminal prosecution until general petraeus famously gave his confidante significant classified information that she should not have had access to. he was led off with a slap on the wrist. the other people had single document and then severely punished but that's in cases where were shown they did it with intent. we still have a lot to learn about president biden back when he was vice president or former vice president and members of congress knowingly remove this information and they could be subject to prosecution for release to be investigated and there will be a determination is whether it's serious enough to warrant restitution. >> professor hathaway to clarify something the executive order that president obama signed. >> the president is the one who sits at the top of the whole thing and has the power to make decisions and to delegate down some of the authority to delegate information pretty good delegated to the vice president. generally there's a process that even the president would go through. it's not liking governme

comparison reality wenner was sentenced to 5 years for just one document, meanwhile biden trump clinton petraeuso the scandal is that the us department of justice discovered them a week before the midterm elections and chose to keep silent about this story, citing internal sabotage. there is also a political moment here. it turns out that the ministry of justice knew all this a week before the election. and what do you understand in general? uh, there's a role here. e who will play or already the minister of justice, aka attorney general gala, because from the very beginning the republicans wanted to put the activities of the ministry of justice in the center of their attention, just so to speak, as fighting so to speak. with an attempt on the rights of the former president. yes, and trump supporters. we know, this is demonization, uh, equating, so to speak, equalizing them or considering that they are all domestic terrorists. here it is shaping up. it seems that the guard decided to play within the framework of such an american tradition, so to speak, to stay behind scramble and be useful to bo