we're in we're already in a climate change event. climate is already changing. and it's going to continue to change. we have to take in it. our foot is on the gas. the first thing to do is to take it off the gas and the next thing to do is put it on the put it on the brakes. if there is any good news in this, i do think that these transitions going to happen very rapidly, that the technologies, once the money there and it is money is flowing into all these things and renewables and alternatives and the things can happen. spectacular fast and they have to the other thing is at the policy side, at the international level, we desperately need a universal action that us, every country on the planet reduce their emissions. i think that's doable. i propose that in the end of the book, i don't have the time to go it, but i it can't just be ad and it can't be piecemeal now because we saw what happened with piecemeal with china and india mooting all the efforts of every other country. so i do think that we can avoid the worst aspects of climate change, but we have to sta

and if it does change us -- change anything we will adjust our projections. and with loans there is a lot going on. and there is one more thing that is interesting read the administration over the past several months has taken on a series of other actions that involve student loans that tend to have the effect of increasing forgiveness for different populations. those are also tens of billions of dollars. altogether, thus nearly a hundred billion dollars beyond the cancellation and repayment. those are in our projections now. heather: there's a lot going on and as you outline, cbo will have a challenging time sorting this out. it gets very political and you probably don't want to go there but stepping back and when you think big picture is there anything you can say on how the ongoing albums in the united states with college affordability are impacting our budget picture? impacting our physical health. is there a bigger picture take away that is a reality? heather: it's a good -- philip: it is a good question there. i'm looking off to the ceiling. and on my m

the biggest change from 22 to 23 is the change of capitalization. there are other things going on as well. they are going up, the wage income. the dollars of that are rising. individual income tax is a vertical states and bundled the different types in there. but there are different changes. >> another double digit entries they do stuff like a one a year for stuff like that. >> there are some economic changes. we have a slowdown in growth that will invent the profits. so it is a mix of the tax changes. and lower economic growth. >> republicans have talked about during currentri debt limits within w the budget they want to balance the budget over time. as a 10 year window and they want to balance the budget bye the end of it. they're also cutting social security to reduce theca spendi. wondering if you can comment what it would take to balance the budget if you don't raise taxes and youou don't make chans to social security and medicare? >> very good. on the screen i am going to go back to the first slide which is in net interest outlays. it is chall

so we speak of regime change, see a regime change could be as simple as a, an election that you voted out a regime. it's very harmless, lidless, nobody gets hurt. a regime change can also reflect the independent will of a sovereign people who cited to liberate themselves from an oppressive regime. or this is wife. in the case of a, my don in, in the ukraine in 2014, we speak of a revolution, a regime change where the people ousted the pro russian. you know, a victory on a coach. we don't admit that it was a could a tar carried out by ultra training. osh ultra nationalists of funded and supported by the united states one would be a blatant violation of international law. the other one is the lawful expression of free will by a sovereign people. and indeed, if one takes a look at the sanctions that were imposed on russia a prior because of the special military operation. this was a regime change operation. this was about bringing harm to the russian people of such a scope and scale that the russian people would become alienated, a disenfranchised up from the russian government and rise

demographics change, inflation changes. we take the full change that we see and update our projections accordingly. we are trying to smooth the projections or anything like that. just to supply the members of congress with the most updated information. reporter: hello, i'm with cnn. if i understand correctly biden at one time student loan debt forgiveness it's assumed that these and these projections that will happen? what if it is struck down by the court ultimately and it doesn't happen this year? will it change the exhaustion date or any other projections? mr. swagel: it's an important question. the student loans just a budget accounting kind of complex and trust funds and things like that. there is some discussion that toward the end of the report. the debt cancellation forgiveness cancellation is -- baseline. the reason is that administration announced it and booked it last fiscal year meaning last september before october 1. what we have done is we took their estimate which is $397 billion the cost of the cancellation

so demographics change, inflations change technology change would take the full change we see at updaterojections accordingly. we are not trying to smooth the projections or anything like that. it's members of congress with the most updatedng information. >> thank you. serve at that. >> with cnn. if i understand correctly, one-time student loan debt forgivenesssu. will that happen this year? so what if it struck down by the court ultimately and does not happen this year. with that change in the of the other projections? >> that is an important question. the student loans just a budget accounting is kind of complex. it's trust fund and things like that. there are some discussions toward the end of the report. the debt cancellation the forgiveness cancellation on the reason for that is the administration announced it and booked it last fiscal year. last september before october 1. so what we have done is taken their estimate which was $397 billion. the net value and that is in 2022. that is the actual cost that is in there. now as you said it's in front of this report. they are arguing la

how much would it cost us not to tackle climate change?e know that 200,000 homes and businesses on the coastline of england alone are at risk of rising sea levels by 2050. and this is already happening. but that's, that's the human cost, but we will also see a cost to our economy, it's been estimates of around 7% of our gdp by the end of the century through climate impacts. you say it's worth the cost, worth investing in net zero but the truth is, what is the point if other countries around the world, much bigger emitters than britain, britain's just 1% of global emissions, other countries aren't making the effort? what is the point of britain making the investment? last year alone, china built more offshore wind capacity in one year in 2021 than the uk as a whole over a decade. we are in a position where we can actually get ahead, develop the technologies, develop the net zero dividend, not only for our citizens, but that we can then export across the world. it's a win—win. but what people like nigel farage say is, look, there's no democr

i change and whatever you do. don't watch my show, stay mainstream because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way things ah, to come to the russian state. little narrative outside, as i told him to ignore some scheme div, asking him the knock ingles all sunset for a coup in the 55 when. okay, so mine is gonna be the one else with the van in the european union, the kremlin. yup. machine. the state on crush us for date and split r t sport neck given our video agency, roughly all band on youtube with requests with me. at this hour, american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free its people. and to defend the world from great danger with proof we will bring to the iraqi people, food and medicines and supplies and sleep with the me mark zack or burn could some of the 21st century cruise. be blamed on facebook. right. like i'm not trying to be su

, ., . ., , , changed? yes, war changes everything and everyone. — changed?ything and everyone. we _ changed? yes, war changes everything and everyone, we have _ changed? yes, war changes everything and everyone, we have seen _ changed? yes, war changes everything and everyone, we have seen how- and everyone, we have seen how everyone from opera singers to engineers have taken up guns, set up charities, put drones in the sky, volunteered to do whatever they can to help the war effort. we have spent time with women whose lives have changed in what is now a changing society. piano plays. there are many lines in life. ukraine's women are on them, from ballet to the battlefield. fighting now for what matters, in their lives, the life of this nation. this war in ukraine is upending so many lives, ukrainians' sense of self, their sense of purpose. a war being waged over ukraine's borders is also changing a people within. translation: when the war began, i thought i wouldn't _ perform on the stage again. now, it's one of the most important things for us and for peop

for change so that when we go out we feelsystemic and institutional changes. if we give the people a real understanding of the nditions that lead to this type of violence and leads to thousands of people sleeping on the street in oakland and that leads to the high unemployment rate we can start putting that revolutionary fervor into the right places and that is all that oakland is missing and that's what we try toprovide. >> you say nothing's changing i think one of the things we have seen time and timeagain are the sorts of videos like the tyre nichols one that was released and i'm curious about your thoughts on that and what seeing these sorts of images does to our psyche collectively . >> advocates a portrait of the history of this country and will he understand history we can understand what's going on right now. if we look at the history of this country in the history of whiteford it white prejudice and the lynchings that took place in slavy during jim crow, those were very public displays of white supremacist violence. designed to put fear into the whole

they can't change cars unless you also change the fuel and you change the way in which you deliver the fuel so lots of pieces. have to change together. people say well, what about efficiency, but there is a phenomenon that's called rebound, which says if i make something more efficient people will use more of it. and there's some debate about how important that is, but it does in fact weaken the impact of efficiency measures. finally changes are going to be disruptive. we're going to see changes in economics employment behavior geopolitics. and large and rapid changes will be very disruptive. i like to say you need to change energy systems by orthodonture not by tooth extraction. small study change all right, um the body administration's plans and goals to reduce emissions real quick. the goal is to reduce emissions. by 20 by 2030 so seven years eight years from now by 50% relative to 2005 its peak and to go net zero by 2050 to zero out emissions from the power sector in 13 years from now. they've been coming down logically because gas has been substituting for coal, but also there's a

have any idea what you need to do to change your life, and you don't even have the drive to change anythingy do anything, if your fate is determined anyway , well, such a learned helplessness. we many times tried to create their own state and everything ended. that's why ukrainians, living in this, they did not recover from learned helplessness, they believed that the opportunity to create now, although a wonderful prospect was opening up, i ask you to understand, i am now sphotolising, do you believe that every person is written in a certain percentage believed in the fact that he wrote to the people, so he writes. and only 22 23 believed, that is , we still had statements from non-fatalists and 59% of fatalists, those who believed that you will not be able to do anything with your destiny, and already this year our situation has changed. i can't say that it has finally changed, but everything and the situation is completely different for those of us who don't believe, everything means that now fatalists no longer define the atmosphere of society in our country, the situation is still not

and some of us changed our views more are changing their views now because of the urgency of climate change, but a lot of the groups to the traditional environmental groups have not changed their positions because it's pretty hard to do a u turn on a big issue like that, the green party in germany for instance, seems like everybody else there has agreed they need to keep some nuclear power plants running as long as possible because of the crisis. but the green party is like, no, we need to shut those down right now. even if it means burning coal and going cold in the winter, but, you know, number one thing is nuclear power. so it's become a kind of ideology for those groups. now will the energy crisis in europe turn public opinion towards nuclear energy? i mean, previously, europe, screen movement was in opposition to nuclear energy and push to close down existing nuclear plants. yes, public opinion is shifting now, as is a lead opinion and political positions all over the world. i mean, places like china and a lot of the poor countries never had this ideology against nuclear power,

as a result of climate change. wanted make more sense to go off the industries that are some of the worst polluters and the was polluters, the fossil fuel industries. and some of the top companies in that regard are china goal for example. so the go guys from this is based on the carbon disclosure project report would not make more sense to target those companies. as you mentioned, an article builder corporations responsible for a high chair of global emissions. but all of them is one of the 50 companies that contributed most to climate change. and it's also part of the same as industry, the world biggest producer of demand. and these industries responsible every year for up to 8 percent of all global emissions. this is much more time since s a v, a in industry, and the fall time fuel and the energy companies. they have already been in the spotlight and they have already faced a number of that also globally. but the cement industry kind of that can be in line, and there should also be the spotlight on them. and tha

how i did it, not for the, the global problem off climate change. and also for the legal case, this is not required because emissions can be caused in land, argentine or india, and they all cause a process into monsieur that causes global warming and then lives. right. so the impact fell on perry, i and regardless of where the emissions are, could use and hosting produces emissions have to big game in a lot of countries globally. but he has nothing in anesha. you're talking about a big scale based on the study that hex, the group that you are a lawyer for, based on the study that hex commissioned. it claims that whole to me responsible for point 42 percent of global fossil fuel and cement emissions. does that make it 100 percent responsible for the climate change impact on party island? no, it doesn't make it a 100 percent responsible because as you just mentioned, it's 1.542 percent. nearly half a percentage of all global industrial emissions since the beginning of industrialization that hosting cost. but there are a lot of other polluters and a lo

and that led to a hotel change in america. we need a similar cultural change when it comes to the embrace of alternative energy. but if the u. s. congress with the house now back in the hands of the republicans, hasn't yet managed to force through that cultural change. others are keeping the fight going. this is the east coast of the usa, like everywhere on the planet. these shows are experiencing the effects of global warming. katie, luciano is a geologist who works for the south carolina department of natural resources. this is one of our road, in transaction i'm measuring from the forest to the theme and getting a better idea of how the shoreline is transitioning as it moves and arose backwards . we've had a episodes of hurricanes, a lot of a very high tides, and the erosion rate has, has basically doubled from it's historical version rate of 7 and a half meters per year. in other words, on erosion rate, that's twice what it would be without climate change. you can look back here and you can see we are right in the forest h

having detailed data on how the atlanta changes over time, how it responds to the changing of the seasons were how it is impacted by severe weather is extremely valuable and necessary to make informed decisions. that's why i'm glad we are holding this hearing today so that we can highlight the importance of the program by showing how it interacts with each of these issues. through these images we can better understand how seasonal changes affect crop yields with unknown locations for mineral deposits and a deeper knowledge of how to prepare for snowmelt across the region. the land sacked program has provided significant resources to individuals and businesses operating in wyoming especially since the program moved towards open data further public. it's my hope that we are able to emphasize the work already underway in the program and prepare the program as we move into the future so thank you all for being here and i'm looking forward to your testimony and our discussion. >> this is one of those moments where we have a lot of balls in the air, so i think the chair the ranking member might

the fact of the matter is by choosing to push for change you have already changed things. through inspiration for others, take up the matter or whether it is through actual functional change as a result of your voice being heard. i think you have already started on a path to change by choosing that path. in doing that in april of itself creates change. i continue in that type of service for my family. something i hope to see in my children. i have a pretty good chance with five children one will go into some sort of civil service. i hope that happens to continue that legacy. >> i am paul, sheriff of san francisco. [ music ] >>> the tenderloin is home to families, immigrants, seniors, merchants, workers and the housed and unhoused who all deserve a thriving neighborhood to call home. the tenderloin initiative was launched to improve safety, reduce crime, connect people to services and increase investments in the neighborhood. as city and community-based partners, we work daily to make these changes a reality. we invite you to the tenderloin history, inclusivity make this ne

able to change the system? i think you have to change your individual behavior before you're interested in changing the system. i really do as someone who is once really deeply enter fast fashion. i truly believe that if you're continuing the same cycles, which did it make me very happy, i'm much happier now. i think that you have to really take yourself out of it. but to define fast fashion, fast fashion is um it's clothing that is rapidly produced. often with little care for the workers and what we've seen is some the cycles in which we buy have sped up dramatically in the last 20 years. it used to be that you had to selling seasons and then it just became more and more and more. they started doing more fashion shows, and then it became, well, this brand on the high street can get address from the runway in the store. it's 7 days fly and everyone's going, that's marvelous. and then it's happening consistently. and the only way that you can really turn a profit when you're in the business of selling that amoun

what did this change? just if it's rather disturbing, because you know, as africans were different, needs more than what's currently available to us to consume by then if you really think about to develop food is really going to pigs. it's almost like putting, you know, the value of human beings to that of like animal is safe or out of the thing. see things more important and done to monday for us. he african also an african union summit. his are wrapping up today in ethiopia. we understand it's been successful and economically integrating the continent as many member countries are also focusing on sovereignty and protection from nations potentially meddling from beyond deb borders. or that's just about it for me here. what are you using a neil at the desk in half an hour? it's fine. i do hope you can join him. ah, [000:00:00;00] a nuclear power is the 2nd largest global source of clean energy after hydro power and around the world. $444.00 nuclear reactors provide over 10 percent of global electricity. bu

they could have changed course, but they didn't. and so neither did we lose those shocking thing we've learned in the last 5 or 6 years is that the oil companies, the biggest companies in the world, had their own science programs inside the company. they had a very deep understanding of the climate crisis before the rest of us didn't really for more than 20 years, could davis has been investigating the role played by big oil in the climate crisis . they were aware that the issue was going to get worse. and yet they did not tell anyone else about this knowledge. they didn't tell governments, they didn't tell the public, they her said it publicly. so that's where the, the crimes this is the shocking story of that disregard. a story of full waste did decades of denial and misinformation time that could have been better spent helping his old transition to a fossil fuel free world. ah ah far out over the atlantic flying observatory. in the early 19 nineties, the shell oil company produced a film about it. scientists had explained why the

many, many countries have made the change. we will not make the change. the change primarily because our politicians very few of whom came into politics to deal with assisted dying, they came in for other reasons, but they didn't want to offend some vested interests, say the church in their constituency . and they their constituency. and they just will not be brave enough to make the change. it's absolutely awful that a combination of politicians and the church of england stop this . you said england stop this. you said everyone . most people have had everyone. most people have had an experience . tell me about an experience. tell me about your seeing people where the end is near, where they feel their time has come. often they've said goodbye to those that they love and. the only you can see the dry trip is in and all they're focusing on is just the is the drip. more painful than it needs to be? they turn their face to the wall. they so desperately want the end and we're not entitled as a matter of law to make sure that it's given. and you know, who's th

to change attitudes. and i think by bringing desegregation into being, it will cause many people who are slow to change their attitudes, move to the point of, changing their attitudes easier than would otherwise. well, -- constitute, about 1/10 of the united states populace. do you think that they can achieve equal rights without the goodwill or agreement of the white majority? or in other words, don't you your task primarily that of one to pursue asian. yes. i think this is very basic, but i wouldn't say it's only persuasion. i see it as both persuasion and legislature and all that goes along with that. both persuasion, moral coercion. i think it is quite true that. if we had to have an integrated society must come by a change of the heart through persuasion. on the other hand, i think you can legislate desegregation. i think that the if not hearts of men have been and are being changed every day by judicial decrees, executive orders from the president and by acts. so that you cannot legislate integratio

how have you changed? how have you changed? what has changed in you ?stem, you need to go beyond it, in order to manage the system , you need to enter it. one day after the victory, but it will be after the victory . let's just say, i want to ask you if the muse has left you because of you . sometimes i write for myself, i make songs, he writes for others, you will play, i will sing from memory, sometimes something in my heart is a little pinched and i have almost no strength to live a new day, as if i was drawing a picture of the world with chalk, the rain has gone into the picture, now the sun is blurred, has gone out, or maybe it has gone behind the rocks stars, patterns on my ceiling, the body has become sluggish, but it seems to have grown, tell me once it was like that with you, once again i am a miracle, they are looking for you because faith deceives them, love breaks the shackles and gives wings instead of legs, a dream is like a torch of the future , the heavens open because each of us can warm the world with our heart and immediately to warm

and then you get to what is that defined as, does that mean change the people in the regime or change the behavior of the people in the region. and so over the last 60 years, the u. s. has continued to expand the commercial and the economic and the political perspective with respect to changing the behavior. cuba has it, has it worked? the cuban government remains, quote, communist, unquote, on the cuban government has not made the type of changes the united states just wanted to made primarily why? well, they've been able to suffer, and i'll give you a quote. for us, diplomat in the midnight ninety's said to me during the visit, this was when we had the us interest section that was during the time where official diplomatic relations were suspended. and he said to understand cuba, you have to understand fidel castro saying this to the united states, and he said, fidel castro would say, i'm willing to let my people suffer. are you willing to let my people shot? well, this is actually a good question. i are then mary, can officials willing to love dark people suffer because i've heard t

to assume how it will change in future lake.ast explored place on the planet. it still remains, sealed, like a huge capsule with an area of ​​16,000 m² and a depth of more than 1,000 m, large-scale research began recently, 300 km from vostok station, we assume that there are older ones, we think that this is the most ancient ice on the planet, and in general . there are ideas there are plans, then then we will be able to compare the ice. so, from the vostok station , compare the ice obtained 300 km away. this is the so-called undersection b or dome b icy, a and get new scientific the results on the climate of the past summer are planned to be delivered to st. petersburg. the first test results will be known in the fall, if i am olga lvukhina pankova. yes, the water is good, don't worry. i saw a grandmother crying and walking with empty eggplants. i told my dad that when i grow up i will find water and deliver it to people , it is important that a person died in my presence. it was very difficult to find people who, risking their

you change their behaviors never happens in. you teach them to be sensible, responsible and accountable adults . well, i think i speak for most americans when i say the time for washington to change his behavior and act like an adult few years is over trus. just matters. the debt limit is one of the most important opportunities congress has to change course . how will we respond will determine what happens to our their children in the coming years and decades. the choice is clear. we can have reckless spending or we can have responsibility . we cannot have both. we can leave our children a future with higher inflation, higher interest rates and crushing debt what what was is what republicans are fighting for and the responsible debt limits increase puts us on a path consult off the table. default on our debt is not an option but neither is a future of higher interest rates and economy that doesn't work for working americans. the debt that it has been used for nearly every successful reform spending. why? because families. surely

but change only happens when institutions change and, and more stuff than just use of the term. and then bringing change to art institutions has also been part of the gorilla girls mission since the 1980s. in particular, they want to see more p o c, and female artists and museums and exhibitions. the group became known through illegal poster campaigns in new york, but to this day, no one knows who was behind the gorilla masks. the group spreads its message everywhere and stands up for their peers with imagination and humor. their posters will be on show in hamburg in march 2023 guilty goes pop quiz. if february is black history month and march is women's history month. what happens the rest of the year discrimination, but isn't what's in their humor, draws people in and have a good flight. and it is fun to then point your finger and say, that's true. what's going on. and he had also his wife, 90 percent of the art on display by white men. july doesn't it really makes you want to stand up too tight. these days, guerrilla girls are active worldwide, an open to female collaborators

but it seems to me that it is necessary to change the methodology a little .looked at the methodology of eurostat. it is quite complicated, but they still take into account the kind of thunderstorm that is gathering now, because also, why should we change the methodology because more and more crop production is also taking place in greenhouses, if we talk about vegetables correctly and the climate is changing , that is, for example, in the southern territories, we insult it to gather several times a year now and it all affects the indicators, so the state will probably have to change the methodology the problem is i think so, but production is definitely fixed and now i read your report and it says that we are not observing production growth, but we are observing a slowdown there is a decline in production rates, not in all areas, not in all industries, so by overestimating, the rates of decline in other industries have slowed down, in particular, we are talking about construction, for example, and trade, but here it should be noted that this is partly due to