an indian, the supreme court panel did find in 2012 that they, they themselves, him for responsibility. but this has sent me a cloud that sort of hung over him for a long time. and, and, and yeah, of course, now we see a state this is, you know, a matter who's really arrived at the pinnacle of, of, of, of world affairs and very much being celebrations. i'd be watching some indian television just just, well, we've been watching things on the fold and, and, you know, promo the channels really holding this up as a, as an extraordinary day. you know, there was a lot of members of the indian diaspora in the garden just as they met earlier. you know, the price of jubilant atmosphere. so so, so you know that, that cost is very much be moved on from and did, you know, this relationship now is being driven much more by kind of a re, i'll pull it cheap, but the united states and india kind of realize that, especially if the united states really wants india to help it pushed back against china, nation and russia as well. are we expecting to see some tough talks there? well, well, i mean, relation

motion to either recuse or have the question referred to an impartial panel of randomly selected judges. in the case of the supreme court, the panel consists of the other justices of the supreme court. the proposed legislation before you is not top down congressional control of granular details, in a coequal branch. on the contrary, section two of the legislation merely requires the supreme court to issue a code of conduct for itself within 180 days. and, doing, so it would merely level up the supreme court so as to bring the highest court in the land more in line with the stronger standards of the couple in all lower courts. chairman durbin's opening statement made this point more eloquently, and certainly more powerfully than i ever could. similarly, section three of the legislation, mandates the justices disclose the same information concerning gifts, income and reimbursement. as required members of congress, and members of the executive branch. the current system particularly because of the lack of enforcement in the supreme court, means that agree just failures to comply with existing federal law richer and recur w

one of the things we did, i have a tool in florida where i can ask the state supreme court to im panel grand jury. a grand jury that has wide investigative power. it can do criminal indictments and things like that but short of that it can subpoena, get documents and issue reports. we did one about illegal immigration and particularly about people being brought into the state of florida. because a lot of this stuff is coordinated with non-governmental organizations and other types of people that are basically working in concert to evade immigration laws. and they were able to get a lot of evidence. they produced some reports, they'll do more. one of the things that i think was most shocking about this how the children are being treated. so what you will say is if you are just like an adult male and you try to come across, your chance of staying is less than if you have a kid in tow. so what they do is they found -- identified a bunch of examples of this, but one example there was a lady from honduras who had four kids and she wanted to come to the united states and there were these oth

we're talking about picking the people who are on the panel that will pick the supreme court judges. so yeah, there's 2 sets of separation that you're up to the right so, so this is all about what the government of apartments have. benjamin netanyahu and his pod. right. coalition partners wanted to try and do this. yeah, they wanted to try and, oh, behold, this country is the additional system in particular by giving more controls, the politicians as to who sits on impulse and quote, say, including the supreme court. one of the ways the politicians have leverage over the court and the nominees, and this is a big issue because there's a couple of vacancies coming up the next few months. is the number of assisting politicians as opposed to lawyers or judges on the panel. the churches, those traditional nominees, historically best being one member of the government and one member of the opposition, the south on that committee and what the government has been pushing forward over the course of months of this year is to have 2 people from the government on that committee, that for inferio

before elizabethan i are going to watch and close the big decisions in the supreme court to any day now panelery much. cap next my conversation about fatherhood with a pastor who has a unique take. shares about his own data by the way helped create a very famous logo you're going to recognize. his words of encouragement for all of us on this father's day, next ah, these bills are crazy. she has no idea she's sitting on a goldmine. well she doesn't know that if she owns a life insurance policy of $100,000 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com. it's on the b want to wish all the dads out there happy father's day. i sent out lead pastor louis earlier this week for the discussion of challenges and joys of fatherhood. in his newest book seeing god as a perfect father, seeing you as love, pursued and secure. pastor good to have you on the show. let me start with this. you have said there is a

before elizabethan i are going to watch and close the big decisions in the supreme court to any day now panel. cap next my conversation about fatherhood with a pastor who has a unique take. shares about his own data by the way helped create a very famous logo you're going to recognize. his words of encouragement for all of us on this father's day, next. be ready for every moment, with glucerna. it's the number one doctor recommended brand that is scientifically designed to help manage your blood sugar. live every moment. glucerna. (vo) crabfest is back at red lobster. when you can choose your crab, and one of three new flavors like roasted garlic butter... ...this is not your grandpa's crabfest... ...unless grandpa's got flavor. dayumm! crabfest is here for a limited time. welcome to fun dining. known as a loving parent. known for lessons that matter. known for lessons that matter. known for being a free spirit. no one wants to be known for cancer, but a treatment can be. keytruda is known to treat cancer, fda-approved for 16 types of cancer. one of those cancers is advanced nonsquamous, non-

that doesn't exist in the supreme court, there is no ethics panel on the supreme court, there is no onecall balls and strikes when it comes to that. what you are getting at here is a significant point that there is a lack of transparency and oversight in the supreme court that is in stark contrast to other branches of government. the justices are largely left to police themselves and ethical issues. there are very few restrictions and when potential conflicts arise, they decide how to handle it. there is no outside arbeiter. host: joshua kaplan saying justices are largely left to police themselves. this morning, your view of the supreme court. they are ending their term, about to break for their summer recess and they have about seven cases left to issue opinions on and we are watching the court this morning on c-span and getting your view of the justices. and the makeup of the court. david in florida, independent, share your view, go ahead. caller: i think the supreme court is about right. i really do support them. host: we lost you come you don't believe, what? caller: i don't leave t

up next the panel on today's major supreme court decisions plus winners and losers and this week's notable's president is urging parents to keep teen-agers at home in a bid to quell rioting spreading across the country. emmanuel macron is suggesting social media is fueling violence following the fatal police shooting of a teen-age driver earlier this week. >> a panel of judges rules former president jay ear bolsonaro is ineligible to run for office until 2030. the group says he abused his power and cast doubts on the country's electronic voting system >> u.s. bombers flied to the peninsula in the latest show of force against the north korea. the planes took part in joint aerial drills with other u.s. and south korean fighter jets. the exercise comes days after north korea staged massive anti u.s. rallies in its capitol. >> to some of the other stories beyond our borders tonight, we'll be right back. ♪ this is the all-new tempur-pedic breeze mattress, and it's designed to help you feel cool. so, no more sweating all night... ...no kicking off the covers... ...or blasting the air conditionin

. >> sandra: and coming up top of the next hour, we are going to have more from our panel reacting to the supreme court decision, carrie severino will be joining us, jessica and garrett, and rich, important to point out where polling is on this issue. and where it was heading into this decision today. american support for affirmative action, according to pew research latest polling, those that disagree or disapprove of colleges giving consideration to race and ethnicity, 50%. those that approve, 33%. unsure, 15%. on americans on whether affirmative action makes admissions more fair, 49% believe it makes it less fair. so, this decision would be in line with a lot of the polling heading into today. and finally, when asked should scotus allow colleges to consider race, this is a cbs poll, 70% said it should not be allowed. this was the thinking heading into thinking, and we'll get our panel at the top of the hour. >> 70%, the court deciding with the majority opinion in the united states here and this is also a court that has gone through a lot of criticism like many of the other institutions in the countr

one of the things we did, i have a tool in florida where i can ask the state supreme court where i can ask them to paneltewide grand jury. basically it is a grand jury that has wide power.. it can do criminal indictments and things like that. even short of that, it can peanut and get doc -- subpoena and get documents. it can have support. he did one about illegal immigration and particularly about people being brought into the state of florida. a lot of this stuff is cord mated with nongovernmental organizations and other types of people that are basically working in consort to evade immigration laws. they are able to get a lot of evidence. they produced some reports and they will do more. one of the things that i think was most shocking about this is how these children are being treated. so what you will say is if you're just like an adult male and you try to come across, your chance of staying is less than if you have a kid in tow. so what they do is they found and identified a bunch of examples of this, but just one example, there was a lady from i think on dewar's she had four kids and she wanted to

supreme court. 2010, federal judge, walker, struck down properly. saying it violated the u.s. constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law. then with a split decision, the panelr the ninth circuit court of appeals, upheld that last forever. setting the stage for the final legal battle before the u.s. supreme court. >> today, san francisco values become america's values. marriage matters. family matters. that is what we are affirming today. >> a huge celebration at san francisco city hall, after a historic u.s. supreme court decision. >>> i am, scott shaver. today the high court ruled the same-sex couples have the fundamental right to marry. no longer me this liberty be denied to them. that is what anthony kennedy wrote in his landmark decision. >> what an incredible october for the giants and their fans. you were in the parade today. what is it about this team and its connecti with the people who live in san francisco? >> in a way, it is sort of an underdog team. nobody gives a much credit. they wind two world series and nobody picks them to wind this world series. it's a team of teamwork. they pull together. it is 25 people, 25 stories. we like that here. we

it's because of donald trump's three supreme court justices that he got to pick. >> panel, please stickd. coming up, chris christie, mike pence, both set to announce their presidential bids. not sure who's going to vote for them, but we'll see. that's both of them in contention for our worst of the week. stick around. stick around make your dream car...a reality. mercedes-benz certified pre-owned vehicles are rigorously inspected to live up to the highest of expectations. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ voltaren. the joy of movement. ♪♪ and there he is. chaz. the rec league's self-crowned pickleball king. do you just bow down? no you de-thrown the king. pedialyte. 3x the electrolytes. whoa. okay. easy does it. we switched to liberty mutual and saved $652. they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. with the money we saved, we thought we'd try electric unicycles. whoa! careful, babe! saving was definitely easier. hey babe, i think i got it! it's actually... whooooa! ok, show-off! help! oh! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ and we're done. hm, what about

it's because of donald trump's three supreme court justices that he got to pick. >> panel, please stickboth set to announce their presidential bids. not sure who's going to vote for them, but we'll see. that's both of them in contention for our worst of the week. stick around. night? try vicks sinex for instant relief that lasts up to 12 hours. vicks sinex targets congestion at the source, relieving nasal congestion, and sinus pressure by reducing swelling in the sinuses. try vicks sinex. i'm your overly competitive brother. check. psych! and i'm about to steal this game from you just like i stole kelly carter in high school. you got no game dude, that's a foul! and now you're ready to settle the score. game over. and if you don't have the right home insurance coverage, well, you could end up paying for all this yourself. so get allstate, and be better protected from mayhem, yeah, like me. thanks, bro. take a lap, rookie. real mature. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ voltaren. the joy of movement. ♪♪ frustrated by skin tags? dr. scholl's has the breakthrough you've been waiting for. the first fda-cleared at-home

supreme court could issue a major decision on affirmative action as early as this week. if they do away with it, what does that mean for college admissions? what does it mean for the country? my paneljessica, if the supreme court ends affirmative action, what happens? >> i think the problem is, we don't know exactly what this ruling is going to say. it could say a myriad of things. they could make really strict limits. they could make it not a street. but i think we are definitely going to see new limits placed on affirmative action in education. and the real concern is that this is the last tool we really have to integrate schools of education -- what has been cut back in elementary school, middle school, high school -- all these kinds of lower education. and now we are going to see it in higher ed. and i think we are going to see some really negative impacts in terms of diversity on campus. >> let's just go back in time for a minute. do you think affirmative action accomplished what it set out to do? >> i think it's a long term goal. i think part of the problem is, when you cut off the legs of affirmative action in high school, middle school, elementary school, it makes it harder

. >> up next, the panel is back with their thoughts on the impact of the supreme court's decision to college admissions. >> president biden speaking out against today's decision by the supreme court to end affirmative action. >> i think they may do too much harm, but i think if we start the process of trying to expand the court, we are going to padilla's politicized them forever in a way that is not healthy. >> that you can't get back? >> that you can get back. and, i think, look, i think maybe it is just the optimist in me, i think that some of the core are beginning to realize their legitimacy is being questioned, in ways that had not been questioned in the past. >> my panel is back with, me and let's talk about affirmative action and was does decided today. it seems the supreme court may be reflecting the feelings of many americans. so the latest polling from pew research shows, the majority of u.s. adults disapprove of colleges considering race and ethnicity in admissions. if you look at it by race, which they also, ask the majority of asian white americans disapprove, but 29% of

let's bring in now our panel to discuss these monumental supreme court decisions today. so, alice, starting with you president biden really laid the blame pretty fully on republicans even more so in some ways than the court. and in some ways republicans definitely sought out this fight seeking to invalidate this executive decision that he had made. how do you think that's going to play? >> look, it was to be expected to blame the republicans, and i thought it was quite ironic he had in his comments that republicans were not thinking about the working middle class americans, when in fact they actually absolutely are. middle class working americans who saved up and paid off their loans are now under biden's plan would have been burdened with paying off other peoples loans. and look, this is -- as even mentioned in the decision nancy pelosi herself said two years ago that president biden doesn't have the authority to do so, this has to be done through congress. congress has the power of the purpose. president biden did not have the authority to give away the house. and whil

. >>> up next, the panel is back with their thoughts on the impact of the supreme court's decision tond affirmative action in college admissions. (dr. aaron king) if you have diabetes, getting on dexcom is the single most important thing you can do. it eliminates painful finger sticks, helps lower a1c, and it's covered by medicare. before using the dexcom g7, i was really frustrated. all of that finger pricking and my a1c was still stuck. my diabetes was out of control. (female announcer) dexcom g7 sends your glucose numbers to your phone or dexcom receiver without painful finger sticks. the arrow shows the direction your glucose is heading-- up, down, or steady-- and because dexcom g7 is the most accurate cgm, you can make better decisions about food, medication, and activity in the moment. after using the dexcom g7, my a1c has never been lower. i lead line dancing three times a week, and i'm just living a great life now. (donna) it's so easy to use. dexcom g7 has given me confidence and control, everything i need is right there on my phone. (female announcer) dexcom is the number on

the parliament will pick 2 members of the panel that appoints judges, including supreme court judges. the move will get politicians greater control of that process and it sparked months of protests before being halted by netanyahu. earlier this year, philip marx is live for us in west jerusalem. do we know which way the boat will go? actually, i'm not up to speed on the timing of this or which way the boat has gone. i'm not sure of him. so it hasn't got happened. so it was actually a challenge now that it might get pushed out for a month. we don't know which way this is going to go just to be very clear to try to explain the context it. there is a commission in israel the decides who should be nominated for the spring cold. that's a 9 person commission. and historically, 2 people on that commission have come from one from the government, one from the opposition parties. what is being debated and what could be voted on today is the idea that there would be 2 members from the government on the committee, which would give them a lot more control over who ends up on the spring. coal does

up next, the panel on the 2024 presidential race, plus supreme court, and the politics surrounding allx affiliates are covering tonight. fox 5 in new york where a judge denies the request of ftx founder sam bankman-fried to compel prosecutors to review files belonging to the now bankrupt crypto exchange. money laundering charges in october. wsvn in miami what caused a condominium building in surf side florida to collapse in 2021. they discovered that its pool deck didn't have enough strength at or between many of its supporting columns likely causing it to crumble. the building partially collapsed on june 24th, 2021. leaving 98 people dead there and this is a live look at los angeles from fox 11. one of the big stories there tonight. the u.s. open tees off at los angeles country club. first, time los angeles has hosted the tournament in 75 years. and some amazing scores. rickie fowler sander should'vely. 62s today. they are atop the leaderboard. a record for the u.s. open. that's tonight's live look outside the beltway from "special report." we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ ♪ i said you want t

supreme court on this. let's go back to our panel now. i have still gotjenny and rina with me.at? welcome though i made my career in the _ that? welcome though i made my career in the republican _ that? welcome though i made my career in the republican party, . that? welcome though i made my career in the republican party, ii career in the republican party, i must _ career in the republican party, i must say— career in the republican party, i must say i — career in the republican party, i must say i have _ career in the republican party, i must say i have agreed - career in the republican party, i must say i have agreed in- career in the republican party, i must say i have agreed in the i career in the republican party, i. must say i have agreed in the past with democrat _ must say i have agreed in the past with democrat president - must say i have agreed in the past with democrat president biden- with democrat president biden possible — with democrat president biden possible answers _ with democrat president biden possible answers to _ with democrat president biden possible an

courts grew, a corresponding supreme court justice because of the circuit-writing responsibilities largely explains the early growth in the oscillation because those circuit panels were a justice visiting and writing and joining in the circuit court activities. and then i think it's workload-driven as there's more and more cases coming within the jurisdiction of the case. i'm sure the supreme court was communicating to the congress, we could use another guy up here. and so laws grow the size of the court. and so, you know, that's largely what got us to nine. >> less political and her workload. >> -- more workload. >> i think structural for the judiciary and workload. >> right. >> the political moment is more in the post-civil war, non-filling of vacancies. legal tender case was pending before the supreme court, and basically the congress leapt the court shrink rather than let ann crew johnson throw the -- grow the court in the wrong direction. >> right. one of the original proposals for reforming the court along with the packing was to designate different districts for each of the justices, right? that they would come from nine different parts of the country and

friends, it is such a pleasure to introduce a panel of three of america's most distinguished historians of the early supreme court to teach us about significant justices that we may not have learned about before. gerard mallioka is the samuel r rosen professor of law at the indiana university robert h mckinney school of law. he's the author of many books which we've had the pleasure of discussing at the ncc and the most recent which we're here to talk about is washington's air the life of justice, bushrod, washington. maybe marcus is research professor of law and directer of the institute for constitutional studies at the george washington university law school where we've been colleagues for many years as editor of the documentary history of the supreme court of the united states 1789 to 1800 professor marcus published eight volumes with many articles on legal history. she was appointed by the librarian of congress as the general editor of the oliver wendell holmes devised the history of the supreme court of the united states in 20 15 and walter starr is a historian a new york times best selling author a two-tim

supreme court rules. we will be watching all those policies and will talk with our panel about the implications and most important whether you agree with this policy or not, the fact is that there are 26 million people who are eagerly awaiting this decision because it affects their personal finances, so we want to talk about the policy but also the people involved here. finally one more plug, we want to not just talk about the policies that we might not like, whether loan forgiveness or any others, but also we want to be for a number of policies, not just to address the debt issue, but address holistically student loans, higher education, and pathways to careers,, so we have been working with higher education strategy groups in a manual and others have participated in those groups and we will be releasing some new ideas and we will try to do it in a new and interesting way where people can interact with those policies and choose those policies they think are best for them. stay tuned for that. for now, i would like to interest the panel one by one. first of all, thank you for joining us today. i am going to start

supreme court rules. we will be watching all those policies and will talk with our panel about the implications and most important whether you agree with this policy or not, the fact is that there are 26 million people who are eagerly awaiting this decision because it affects their personal finances, so we want to talk about the policy but also the people involved here. finally one more plug, we want to not just talk about the policies that we might not like, whether loan forgiveness or any others, but also we want to be for a number of policies, not just to address the debt issue, but address holistically student loans, higher education, and pathways to careers,, so we have been working with higher education strategy groups in a manual and others have participated in those groups and we will be releasing some new ideas and we will try to do it in a new and interesting way where people can interact with those policies and choose those policies they think are best for them. stay tuned for that. for now, i would like to interest the panel one by one. first of all, thank you for joining us today. i am going to start

tech policy reporter at "politico" and have the honor of moderating the panel and coming section 230, and watch the supreme courtcases very closely, as you guys did. and i wanted to kind of get each of your positions on the law itself and where you see it's been beneficial in your area of work. we can go down the line. >> well, as senator, first of all, thank you so much to new america for hosting this event today. at this i think critical year for the law. as senator wyden said, wikipedia would not exist without section 230 and that it's absolutely true. section 230 not only protects, and just to clarify, the wikimedia foundation which i work for is the technical and legal host of volunteer run platforms. so wikipedia of which andrew is an active editor is all the content is written and edited and uploaded by volunteers. the rules that are set by volunteers and enforced by volunteers, foundation hosts technically the servers that enable wikipedia to be accessed by people around the world. and we also have the lawyers and the policy teams that of course deal with many government requests, demands, deal with comp

the panel did not make a final decision at today's meeting. today marks one year since the supreme courtecision to overturn roe v. wade. more than one dozen states have established near or total abortion bands. president biden signed an executive order yesterday aimed at preserving access to contraception. as abc news reporter justin finch reports, reproductive rights are poised to play a crucial role in the 2024 election. >> saturday will mark one year since the supreme court's decision reversing roe v. wade federal abortion protections. some 25 million women of childbearing age now live in states where abortions are now harder to get. in washington, the president and vice president attending a reproductive rights event and earning early endorsements from pro-abortion access groups, including planned parenthood. >> americans will not standby with the court to take away the right that is so fundamental. we will fight to restore these protections of roe v. wade and make it the law of the land once again. we are going to do that. >> 20 democratic leaning states have protected abortion acce

panels of democratic voters as well. geoff: in just a matter of days, the u.s. supreme courted to rule on whether president biden's plan for student debt forgiveness can go forward. it comes at a major moment for borrowers who may have to restart those loan payments this fall. william brangham gets some perspective about those concerns and what borrowers may need to think about. william: the president's plan would forgive as much as $20,000 of student loan debt for many borrowers. before that plan was put on hold, over 16 million people were approved for that forgiveness. if enacted, that could cost the government as much as $400 billion. while that's been playing out, for three years since the start of the pandemic , interest and principal payments on federal student loans have been paused, but they're set to resume in just a few months. all this has left a lot borrowers worrying about what's ahead. here's what a few of them told us -- and none of these people are just out of school. they work in education, and for local government agencies. >> my name is carolann fry. i liv

panel that appoints judges rejected the candidate from netanyahu's own party. the proposal sparked months of nationwide protests. they include giving the governing coalition power to choose supreme courtces. philip marks has been following the vote in west jerusalem. >> one of the key elements of the overhaul that prime minister netanyahu had been proposing for the next few months involved the ability of the government to decide who should sit on a key committee that would decide judicial nominees for courts including israel's supreme court the test today a key test was whether the government would be able to push through its own candidates to sit on that committee, despite compromised talks with the opposition in which the opposition had hoped that would not be the case. the consequences of the folk were profound. it was a significant win for the opposition because one of their candidates has been selected, voted three with a narrow majority, to sit on the committee. whereas the only remaining candidate from the party of prime minister net yahoo! was heavily voted against, meaning there will be a second vote 30 days from now to decide which other candidate can sit on the key committe

the july recess, will have a mark of the supreme court ethics bill in the senate judiciary committee. >> with that, let's get smarter the help of our lead off panel bennett is here, co-anchor of pbs news hour and pbs is chief washington correspondent. luke broadwater joins us, pulitzer prize-winning congressional reporter for the new york times, and our dear friend barbara mcquade, a veteran federal prosecutor and former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan. we've got a lot to cover. barb, before we get to all of that, there is another story that crossed in the last couple of hours. the department of justice has now turned over trial discovery information to donald trump and his legal team and a classified documents case, the mar-a-lago case. what does this tell you? >> well, it shows me that jack smith is not wasting any time. it is rather routine to begin the discovery process, usually within about ten days of the arraignment the prosecutor will start to turn over documents. but we see jack smith jumping right on. this they will need to have some sort of meeting to discuss the protocols for the classified information. but everythi

folks who worked on the supreme court in the 1980s, the nineties, the 2000 where yes, it was a shadow docket there. yeah, it was the death docket. and so it was the death panels that really pushed the court to take the steps. we didn't tend to focus on the procedural moves because everyone assumed it was just unique to the death penalty space, that it was over there. yeah. and one of the things that really happened starting in the mid 20 tens is the court starts taking what had been a death penalty approach and starts applying it to everything to obama's clean power to trump immigration policies, covid mitigation measures to, congressional redistricting so that now these procedures are all i would say you know sort, of problems become magnified exacerbated because they're being applied in context much broader. so the public is completely in the dark as to who decided who's in agreement, who's in disagreement. you have an unsigned or a b, you have a public dissent like my memory of the abortion in case in texas that you alluded to is, that elena kagan lost her -- after after that term. that is after that decision and said this is crazy so i mean, the one that.