western countries are not ready to maintain that status e of the international system of the versailles washingtonystem. which developed after the first world war, they are ready to give hitler a free hand both inside germany and, as events in czechoslovakia later showed outside of it, which, of course, inspired the nazi leadership, the anglo-german agreement of 1935 . this event, this historical fact, fits into the general scheme. hitler's appeasement policy of the third reich, which carried out by the western countries and, above all , the lady of the seas of great britain, the essence was that yes, they were afraid of german aggression. they did not want to fight the germans. everyone remembered the terrible first war. nobody wanted a new war. everyone wanted peace and everyone saw that hitler was violating the rules of the treaty of versailles, that he was overloaded and so on , that he wanted something else to shut him up and to secure the world in a way that does not realizing that this is only a ruin, based on this, and the actions of the nazi leadership are aimed at revising the provisions

western countries were not ready to maintain that status e of the international system of the versailles washington system. which developed after the first world war, they are ready to give hitler a free hand both inside germany and and as events in czechoslovakia later showed outside of it, which, of course, inspired the nazi leadership, anglo-german agreement of 1935. this event, this historical fact, fits into the general scheme. the policy of appeasing hitler of the third reich, which was carried out by western countries and, above all, by the lady of the seas of great britain, was that yes , they were afraid of german aggression. they did not want to fight the germans. everyone remembered the terrible first war. nobody wanted a new war. everyone wanted peace and everyone saw that hitler was violating the rules of the treaty of versailles, that he was overloading and so on, that he wanted something else and we concluded in the fact that he needs to quit falling, well, some part , to satisfy him, so that he shuts up and to ensure peace in this way, they do not understand that this will only ruin

all sides to play some significant role, but without encountering the restrictions of the versailles washingtonhis agreement noted in particular. marshal foch noted that this is the world? this is a truce for 20 years. absolutely prescient and, uh, thoughtful in this respect, but nonetheless, and britain thought that this gin could be kept in a bottle through a low-key policy through the limited concessions that the brit. the kelitites were ready to let hitler turn a blind eye to individual violations of the treaty of versailles in order for germany to stop feeling humiliated and through this to become act more calmly in the international arena. and if such aggression on the part of the german leadership would be checked, then it would not be directed in the western direction, but in relation to the soviet union, taking into account the anti-communist anti-soviet pathos of the nazi ideology. it was quite natural. under the treaty of paversal, germany did not have the right to many things and its army was completely drastically reduced. and the fleet was allowed to her fleets. only in some, in s

, but i have the feeling that the authors of this ideas they roughly applied there for the versailles-washingtonstem or the potsdam versailles or something like that, and we are talking about a global forum for the establishment of peace and the definition of a new order . it can happen without russia, it can happen without russia from the point of view of developing , let’s say, the content of the treaty, its provisions, and somewhere about drawing the main next world order, it can happen. the fact is that history knows such examples when similar things were produced not only without participants in the conflict. in general, in one office, well, remember at least woodrow wilson’s points, and then these points were simply as if dictated and er became the subject of a serious er versailles versailles agreement regarding how much today this case is possible, here one very important point is omitted, such things were usually used after the world went through a continental and global war. and only then did similar things appear at the exit, and is there a chance for the world today? here we are toda

that's washington and rochambeau at the french officers at yorktown and a copy of a painting that hangs at versailles. um, and you go up on the second floor, i call it a movie you can walk through because we really tried to create a very immersive experience of the founding of the nation. so some areas are very artifact rich. there's about 500 works of art and objects. we do lots of rotations. there were refreshing the stories that we tell. we use media in certain ways to animate and explore the stories of some of those objects. we're very big on immersive spaces, so massachusetts gets its due with the liberty tree here. there's actually a piece of the last survivi libtyree. that's actual wood from, a liberty tree that std the groundofhat's now st john's college in annapolis, maryland, d ew down in a hrine in 1799. and someone donated a board and i thought, what are we going to do with this? and then we came up with this idea to make it a touchable element. and i think kids respond to that tt than the touch screens, to be honest. it's absolutely fabulous. so a lot of tactile, interactive. this is a g