role the university of chicago played internationally because the university of chicago had a very aggressiveattracting students particularly from latin america and this had nothing to do with milton friedman. it wasn't his idea. it was actually a decision that came out of the state department where there was a lot of concern in the 1950s that latin america was moving to the last and moved further and further. the idea was picked up in the head of the program for what became the usaid that they would bring sponsored groups of students to study at the university of chicago economics department precisely because it was so conservative and in fact in this time it was seen as very out outside of the mainstream because the united states was in the grips of keynesianism, all the ivy leagues. the university of chicago was different and they had of this program to bring eventually hundreds of latin american students to study under friedman and his colleagues and that had a tremendous impact on the politics of latin america because when there was the series of military coups in the 70s, there was a, t

role the university of chicago played internationally, because the university of chicago had a very aggressive program of attracting international students, particularly from latin america. this had nothing to do with milton friedman. it wasn't his idea to do this, it was a decision out of the state department. there was a lot of concern in the 1950's that latin america was moving to the left, it certainly was, and it moved further and further left in the 1960's and 1970's. the idea was cooked up at the university of chicago economics department, that they would bring sponsor groups to study at the university of chicago economics department precisely because it was so conservative. in the 1950's it was seen as really outside the mainstream of american economic discourse because the united states was still in the grip of keynesian economics. chicago was different. they eventually brought hundreds of latin american students to study under friedman and his colleagues. that had a tremendous impact on the politics of latin america. there were a series of military coups in the 1970's and t

university of chicago is a fantastic example of where this is built into the culture. universities are training students not to play drugs, not to harass others on campus, but are they really training young people to engage in vigorous debate and dialogue and exercise your free speech, but also listen respectfully to those you disagree with? this is really about our democracy. it's based on whether we can find some common ground, continue to work together. if universities aren't training our future leaders to do that well, our democracy's at stake and it's struggling right now in part because of the conflicts. peopling yelling at each other for sound bites and clicks. being incredibly disrespectful. >> the university of chicago is an outstanding institution, but it's also an outliar in many ways. i want to ask you about your alma mater, harvard, where 100 mem members of the facultkih facul letter. where's the line between protecting students and freedom of thought? >> it's a great question. i'm not a legal scholar mhere, but it's very important we have free speech and f

university of connecticut. rtford. she is series editor with the chicago visions and revisions series at the university of chicago press. newport's research has been supported recently by university of connecticut humanities. university of, illinois at chicago libraries and, the black metropolis research consortium. she received a pd. in history temple university in 2016. newpt hails tulsa, oklahoma and tacoma and lives in west hartford, connecticut. dr. amanda klonsky is a lecturer at the university of chicago crown scol of social work and the author of the fohcoming book pandemic of punishment to be published by beacon press. this pivotal work chronicles the experience of people in american jail and prisons during the covid crisis. until recently, she served as a at the ucla law covered bars data project. aman led education programs in jails andrisons for more than years and holds a doctorate in education leadership from harvard universal. thank you very much for being here. thanks to everyone for coming and thanks for supporting. good. can you hear me now? thanks, everyone, for coming. nice to see you, melanie thank

smith went to the last republican attorney general, who was formerly of the university of chicago. and levi puffed on his pipe and said, it's one damn thing after another." i thought it was an excellent description of my tenure as attorney general. >> that was my question. did it prove to be? bill: it's always been one damn thing after another but hard to believe it was more trying circumstances at least in recent history than try to serve in this administration given the political climate. i will say my chief of staff was ed levy's grandson, will levy. you had a very successful career and a sterling reputation, and you were willing to take that chance to go in and serve as trump's second attorney general. why did you do that? bill: well, there are a number of reasons. i had no desire to go back in. it was to me, personally, it was a downside. jan: you didn't seek out the job? bill: not at all. matter of fact, i was advancing other people. i knew the president would lower the boom on jeff sessions after the midterm election. so conservative legal circles were abuzz about who should

that it's philosophy and richard epstein is a law professor at new york university and the university of chicago and they've made an argument for many years and have made arguments for the drastically turnovers and tailed state and no government provision of healthcare and he think the private charity will take care of it. i think that the waste and inefficiency there is, we're talking about something approaching 10% of the u.s. economy. there's disagreements about the other levels of optimism to using that to support their libertarianism. milton friedmann, whistled talk about in the book. murray rothguard. >> he's the most important political philosopher you never heard of. >> the best known political philosopher and persuaded charles coke to help found the libertarian party and to found the kato institute. he was an anarchist and elmore posed to state power he thought that it's illegitimate for the state to exist at all and taxization is theft. about the wrongness of state power at all and in part on extremely optimistic arguments centers of armed power withth the same geographical ar. we've h

professor john mirshemer of the university of chicago. joins us now, professor, always a pleasure, thank you very much for making time for us today, um, given the well-known and understood closeness of the united states to israel, what leverage, if any does the us have? example, as we speak, literally as we speak, the secretary of state of the united states is in israel. trying to ask the israelis to engage in a pause, i guess eupumism for a temporary ceasefire while humanitarian aid comes in and apparently is not having any success, what leverage does he have? he has remarkably little leverage, the fact is that the united states and israel are joined at the hip, there are no two countries in recorded history that have a closer relationship than the united states and israel, and when this crisis broke out on october 7th, the biden administration made it very clear from the get go that we would give uh israel whatever aid it needed and that meant both weapons and money and that we would support israel to the help and we have done that and once you take into account that that tight relatio

among the witnesses university of chicago medicine metropolitan family services von bryant and former associate deputy attorney general steven cook. this is just under two and half hours. >> this meeting of the senate judiciary committee will come to order. a hearing on gun violence epidemic public health crisis is today's topic. we'll hear from public health experts who have been on the front lines of gun violence epidemic. we understand the pain of a lump on his fellow member has been taken away too soon by the pull of a trigger was in the aftermath tearing through bone like it is tissue paper. in cities like chicago to a constant drumbeat of a gun gunviolence has turned public health professionals into battlefield experts. chicago faces the same challenges as many other cities and towns. many rural areas need higher rates of gun violence than the urban areas. across the country gun violence is a public health epidemic more than 2022 firearm related deaths in the united states. that is 132 americans every day dying from gun violence. than half theg firearm related vents or suicides

for judging freedom, today is friday november 3rd, 2023, professor john mirscheimer of the university of chicago, joins us now, professor, always a pleasure, thank you uh very much for making time for us today, um, given the well-known and understood closeness of the united states to israel, what leverage, if any does the us have? example, as we speak, literally, as we speak, the secretary of state of the united states is in israel, trying to ask the israelis to engage in a pause, i guess euphemism for a temporary ceasefire while humanitarian aid comes in and apparently is not having any success, what leverage does he have? he has remarkably little leverage uh, the fact is that the united states and israel are joined at the hip, there are no two countries in recorded history that have a closer relationship than the united states and israel, and when this crisis broke out on october 7th, the biden administration made it very clear from the get go that we would give uh israel whatever aid uh it needed and that meant both weapons and money and that we would support israel to the health and we have

. >> richard epstein is a law professor at new york university and the university of chicago. has made an argument, has for many years, has made arguments for a drastically curtailed state. cannot so much on the basis of arguments of ab tract principle, but on the basis of very optimistic predictions about what an unregulated market will produce. so, for example, with respect to health care, he wants there to be no government provision of health care because he thinks that private charity will take care of it. i think-- you know, this is an unprovable disagreement that the private, providing health care for all the people who didn't afford it is way beyond the means of private charity. even if you got rid of all of the waste and inefficiency there is, we are talking about something approaching 10% of the u.s. economy. so, we have a disagreement as a matter of prediction about that. there are other followers of hayek who bring comparable levels of optimism to-- and use that to support their libertarianism. milton freedman, who i talk about in the book, is another. >> murray rot

>> guest: a law professor at the university of chicago at new york university. epstein has made an argument for many years, has made arguments for drastically curtailed state, not so much on the basis of arguments of abstract principle but on the basis of very optimistic predictions about what an unregulated market will produce, with respect to healthcare he wants there to be no government provision of healthcare because he thinks private charity will take care of it. i think, this is an unprovable disagreement, that providing healthcare for all the people who can't afford it is way beyond the means of private charity. even if you got rid of all the waste and inefficiency, we are talking about something approaching 10% of the us economy so we have a disagreement as a matter of prediction about that. there are other followers of hayek who bring comparable levels of optimism and use that to support their libertarianism. milton friedman is another. marie rothbard is one of the most important political philosophers you never heard of. he was active in the libertarian

researchers at the university of chicago have been looking into the impact of cool roofs, not only one water, which is often used in india for cooling. so we've studied these roofs in the context of urban slums in delhi. and, you know, one of the interesting things we found was sort of an engineering kind of one—on—one description of these roofs would be, "you make the roof reflective, "so temperatures come down." what we found also was that people are using a lot of water to cool down their homes and that water is scarce. you don't have sort of piped water in the house, so it comes with tankers. and so what happens is you're competing with kind of drinking water, bathing and so on. and cooling your home is one of those things you can do. and so what we found, some evidence suggesting was when you put on this reflective paint, indoor temperatures only dropped by a very small amount because people start using less water for cooling. so in other words, the adjustment is behavioural. it's that, "i would rather have more water "than have a cooler home, so i'm going to reduce my inputs "an

of hamas. this is a far cry from where universities used to be. in 1967 in the midst of the passions of the vietnam war and the civil rights movement, a report by a university of chicago committee chaired by the legal scholar harry calvin, argued that the mission of the university could not be fulfilled if the institution formally took positions on controversial political issues of the day. the committee wrote, a university, if it is to be true to its faith in intellectual environment, must be hospital to the community but it is only a community only for the limited or great purposes of teaching and research. it is not a club, it is not a trade association. it is not a lobby. simply put, the university is the home and sponsor of critics. it is not itself the critic. the basic argument for free speech espoused by the report is that it is better to hear those who you violently disagree with than to ban them or silence them. that way debate happens out in the open and points are matched with counter points and to drive discourse into the shatters and gutters of political life where it festers and turned into conspiracy theories and often erupts into violence. growing up

this is professor ben zhao from the university of chicago.lab say they've developed a solution. they call it glaze. at its core, glaze uses the fact that there is this ginormous gap, difference between the way that humans see visual images and how machine learning models see visual images. because we see things differently, glaze can make changes that are almost imperceptible to the human eye but that dramatically alter how a machine sees it. so if you're an artist, you glaze your art, you post it online, you can rest comfortably knowing that a model that's trying to steal your style from that piece will learn a very different style that's incorrect. and when it's trying to mimic you, it willjust fail — hopefully spectacularly. as you can see, the ai artwork generated from a piece with glaze is similar in content but not really in style. to learn more, we asked the team to show us glaze in action. start here. you can see some changes already, kind of on the texture on the — the right side one is the original and this is the glazed one. you ca

connolly, senior fellow with the public affairs and media research department at newark at the university of chicago. it is an objective, nonpartisan research organization. marjorie, thanks for your time. >> hi. thank you for having me. >> yeah, no, this is such an interesting topic. your group, newark, does independent social research. what did you set out to discover in this study? >> well, we started out with doing an interviews with human resources represented at a companies where at least 10% of their employees work at least partially remotely or fully remotely, and i think we started off trying to find out what what people thought about working remotely, how other companies might be, what they might be doing to get people interested in coming back to the office. and then we did another survey where we talked to adults nationwide and asked them, you know, what's the how we ask people whether they work from home or they work from the office. and we asked them like, what was the main reason they did one or the other? and we found out why people like going to work or why they don't like going to w

retaliation and promote successful recovery just 2% over 8000 participation patients at the university of chicagoital. without these programs and this initiative, 45% of patients with a gunshot wound are likely to return within five years with another. that is a stunning statistic. 48% will return shot a second time. similar steps are underway across the country to use the strategy which is community violence intervention. trusted committee figures to engage with individuals at high perpetrating or being victims of violence. they worked to interrupt acts of violence before they happen and connect people with treatment and tools that decrease the risk of future violence. it's time for us to build on the bipartisan safer communities act and ongoing efforts are working red and blue states joined together surely we can find some common ground before the parties to create real change for the american people what comes the public health crisis of gun violence. an amount turned to senator cornyn. >> think youha mr. chairman. just a few months ago democrat governor of mexico issued a quote public health

of hamas. this is a far cry from where universities used to be. >> in 1967 in the midst of the pags of the vietnam war and the civil rights movement, a report by the university of chicago committee chaired by the eminent legal scholar argued that the commission of the university could not be fulfilled if the institution formally took positions on controversial political issues of the day. the committee wrote, a university if it's to be true to its faith and intellectual inquiry, must embrace, be hospitable to the views within its own community. it is a community, but only for the limited or the great purposes of teaching and research. it is not a club. it is not a trade association, it is not a lobby. simply put, the university is the home and sponsor of critics. it is not itself the critic. basic argument for free peach is that it-- to balance and silenc them and that way debate is out in the open and points match with counterpoints and the alternate sif to drive this point to the shadows and gutters of political life where it festers, turns into conspiracy theories and often erupts into violence. growing up in india i read with wonder about the united states' commitm

. >> gone to university of chicago my all ma -- and said i have this conversation with vivek ramaswamyto talking to people on the other side and we had a twitter exchange and he said i'll do it but i want to do it in new hampshire which makes sense given he's running for president there. we went to the same college and to his credit he kept it civil. it was a exchange with two people who have a very different vision for the future of america. but we need more conversations like that. >> do you think america is going tofe see that in the third republican debate that's taking place tonight in tampa? >> i doubt it. i think he may have more zingers tonighthe than he did with me bt i think what the country needs is more conversations like vivek and not base on trying to score rhetorical poapght but really articulating fundamental differences we have about role of government and improving people's lives about -- theer need to have tax policy tt doesn't give breaks to the wealthy. about american leadership and foreign policy, and we just have very differentip views. i hope some of your viewer

he joins us now and directs university of chicago's project on security and threats., thank you for being with us. you say overwhelming military force will not work in this situation. why? >> the key to defeating a terrorist group like hamas is separating the hamas terrorists from the local population. unfortunately the order by israel to have over a million palestinians go from the north to the south is not meaningful in this regard. in fact, what you are seeing is hundreds of thousands have not left, and they haven't left for a variety of reasons. many are too old. many too young. to infirm. need help in hospitals. others staying behind to care for them. what you are seeing is that the thousands of civilian casualties, over 8,000, are occurring as these military operations are going forward, and these are becoming ripe for recruitment by hamas. in fact, what you're likely going see is israel will produce more terrorists than it kills. this is because the operation itself is unifying hamas and the local palestinian population. >> so what could israel be doing differe

as the university of chicago scholar robert pate notes, the only way to create lasting damage to terrorists is to combine typically in a long campaign of years sustained selective attacks against identified terrorists, with p political operations that drive wedges between the terrorists and the local populations from which they come. he suggests that alongside a military response, they should present some pathway to a palestinian state. david petraeus defeated a series of terrorist groups emphasized that separating the general population from the terror group is key. in addition, he adds, you have to offer the population something, some hope for a better future. in his and andrew roberts' new book "conflict", they contribute to to the political factors as the military ones. israel is not following pet rayas's strategy. there is an estimated 30,000 to about 40,000 fighters in gaza with a population of more than 2 million, half of which is children. as best we could tell, gazans have had mixed views toward hamas. it won one election in 2006, mounted a coup in 2007 and has ruled since then wit

went to university of chicago; correct? rachel: correct. todd: you want to go to the best of the best of the best. my mom, i know you're watching and i don't mean to call you out on air, my mom's goal was to get my to ivy league school when i was in high school. that was her dream. yesterday talking to my mom about college expenses she said i do not want those two grand kids of mine going to ivy league school. look at that change. rachel: it's taken long for people to wake and you happen protest on campus are doing it but, boy, it's been going on for a long time. it's scary. joey: i don't want to push us away from this but growing up in college, it was all about football. not on the docket as an option. i was told stay out of trouble and graduate high school. on that topic of college, and football, former president donald trump is going to head down to south carolina and he's watching nikki haley's alma mater clemson take on what some of us call usc, university of south carolina in a big football game but the big story is where does nikki ha

at the university of chicago trained economist in harvard medical school professor and doctor, she'ser uniquely equippd to answer these questions and as a critical care doctor and massachusetts general hospital that researches healthcare policy, christopher conference the impact on the hospital's patients in the singular work of science and medicine, they show us how medicine really works and its effect on all of us. we are so pleaseden to host this event tonight. please join me. [applause] there wee go. hello and welcome. i am extremely excited to be here to talk about the new book. we talked about what to do in the conversation and he told me that his goal is for it to be entertaining so that is what we are going for. so this is a book about those random moments that determines outcomes in medicine and how to use those random moments to understand the deeper questions and generate information about causal relationships. what is so special and unusual is that you are uniquely good about generating ideas out of your own experience. i know that not all of his ideas are generated in this

william is a professor of law and faculty director of the constitutional law institute at the university of chicagoaw school. we also have with us michael mcconnell, the richard and francis mallory professor and director of the constitutional law center at stanford, as well as senior fellow at the hoover institution. from 2002 to 2009 he served on the circuit. >> will was actually my clerk. everything he learned he learned from me. [laughter] >> no doubt. >> can we have the first slide with the text? next slide. thanks. our topic is section three of the 14th amendment which says no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or hold any office, civil o military, under the united states or any state who he taken an oaths officer of any stat legislature, or executive officer of any state, to support the constitution shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. but congress may vote by two thirds to remove such disability. the question is what it means for us today. there are two important topics. one about procedure and

william is a professor of law and faculty director of the constitutional law institute at the university of chicago law school. we also have with us michael mcconnell, the richard and francis mallory professor and director of the constitutional law center at stanford, as well as senior fellow at the hoover institution. from 2002 to 2009 he served on the circuit. >> will was actually my clerk. everything he learned he learned from me. [laughter] >> no doubt. >> can we have the first slide with the text? next slide. thanks. our topic is section three of the 14th amendment which says no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or hold any office, civil or military, under the united states oan state who have taken an oath as an offerf any state legislature, or executive officer of any state, to suphe constitution shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against th same, or giveai or comfort to the enemies thereof. but congress may vote by two thirds to remove such disability. the question is what it means for us today. there are two important topics. one about procedure and one a

. >> 63-year-old john eastman graduated from the university of chicago law school, clerked for supremeand was dean of chapman university's law school in california. he views the world from the far right and has said the political left is an existential threat. >> we're no longer disagreeing about means to get to shared ends. we've got wings of the two parties that disagree fundamentally on the ends and the purpose of our government. >> existential, you said? >> well, i do think existential. i think what we're seeing now and the criminalization of political opposition and the threat to shutting down speech of opposing political views, means that the people are no longer in charge of the direction of their government. >> in november 2020, eastman joined rudy giuliani's effort to persuade seven states to withhold certification of joe biden's victory. >> there's a plethora of evidence that you can go through that will convince you that this election was stolen. >> my name is john eastman. >> eastman testified on zoom to lawmakers in georgia. he said, state election officials hadn't followe

at the university of chicago trained economist and harvard medical school professor at doctor, anupam jena is uniquely equipped to answer these questions as as a critical care doctor who researches healthcare policy, christopher worsham confronts their impact on the hospital's a kissed patients. in a singular work of science and medicine they show us how medicine really works and its effect on all of us. we are so pleased to host this event tonight. please join me in welcoming anupam jena, christopher worsham, and emily oster. [applause] the changes it on? am i doing it right? am i doing it right? okay, here we go. hello. and welcome. i am excited to be here to talk about the new book, we talked about what to do in this conversation, he told me his goal is for it to be entertaining so that's what we are going before. so this is a book about the sometimes random moments that determine outcomes in medicine and more than that is about how you use those random moments to understand deeper questions and generate information about causal relationships. what i think is so special and unusual

university of chicago and northwestern here in illinois. seeing it literally across the country. urprised. it's shocking the level of anti-semitism, of hate to see these students calling for the elimination of the state of israel and the murder of jewish people, which is what the chant from the river to the sea palestine will be free explicitly is about. it's the chant of the plo and hamas. that's why group students like students for justice in palestine and others should not be getting these tax benefits and why the legislation is so important. but, also, we need leadership from administrations, from others in our community to stand up and say we're not going to accept the fear and intimidation that are being let out on our students. any kind of hate, you know, we saw a shooting in vermont on saturday. that's unacceptable. anyone should be able to walk on campus, walk near campus. walk in their neighborhood. free from fear of attack or intimidation. we need to make sure that this stops. >> bret: yeah. last thing, congressman kustoff. are you encouraged what you are seeing about t

retaliation and promote successful recovery just 2% of over 8000 participating patients at the university of chicagoe returned to the hospital. without these programs in this initiative, 45% of patients with a gunshot wound are likely to return within five years with another one. that is a stunning statistic. 45% within five years will return shot a second time. similar steps are underway across the country to use this strategy which is known as community violence intervention. it's a trusted program to engage with individuals at high risk of perpetrating or being victims of violence.they work to interrupt acts of violence before they happen and connect people with treatment that decreases the risk of future violence. it's time for us to build on those bipartisan, safer committees act ongoing efforts working in red and blue states and join together. surely we can find some common ground between parties to create real change for the american people when it comes to this public health crisis of gun violence. now turn to senator cornyn. >> thank you, mr. chairman. just a few months ago, the democratic

researchers at the university of chicago have been looking into the impact of cool roofs, not only on delhi. and, you know, one of the interesting things we found was sort of an engineering kind of one—on—one description of these roofs would be, "you make the roof reflective, "so temperatures come down." what we found also was that people are using a lot of water to cool down their homes and that water is scarce. you don't have sort of piped water in the house, so it comes with tankers. and so what happens is you're competing with kind of drinking water, bathing and so on. and cooling your home is one of those things you can do. and so what we found, some evidence suggesting was when you put on this reflective paint, indoor temperatures only dropped by a very small amount because people start using less water for cooling. so in other words, the adjustment is behavioural. it's that, "i would rather have more water "than have a cooler home, so i'm going to reduce my inputs "and let the roof take on some of that burden." of course, painting the world's roofs white won't solve the climate

bureau of economic research authored by economists from take a breath, harvard, princeton, university of chicagohe u.s. treasury. take a deep breath, folks. that crowd sometimes gets to right. this study argues that the largest corporate tax deduction in u.s. history was a roaring success. nearly all the corporate tax cuts are still in place. that's the good news. ? short, the key conclusions of this guilt edge corporate panels and the dax cut generated more business investment, more growth, more wanes for workers and as lower corporate taxes generated in expanding the economy, there was no impact on government revenues. that is the [inaudible] at work. tax cuts are starting to expire at least for business expenses and in early 25 for individual tax cuts and all the liberal scorekeepers in washington are going to tell you extending the trump tax cuts will cost $3 trillion for even more. don't believe them. they're always wrong. and importantly the heart of the tax cut is permanent through new legislation. hat tip to frames free man for flagging the pro growth side story and another hat tip to my

i think one of the most powerful statements came from the dean of students at the university of chicagohen he wrote to the entering class of 2020 and he told them yes you have to be on campus it's certainly a place you cannot be challenge you could not be threatened. they are not going to be trigger warnings in the classroom. you cannot shut down a speaker, speakers have to be able to come and hear the points of view i've heard what the student said about the campuses. the university of chicago it they have upheld the values of bring diverse points of view when the graduates go out into the world they can become leaders at they know what people will be sent on multiple sides of the issue we have to maintain that value progress ms. burnett to have anything to add to that? >> of course. universities have harder jobs in any of us ine this room. they have to teach about how to think about tell them what to think. we have not mastered that. they are chartered. their mission is to include those young people in this hearing room and jewish students can fill with their ideas and their perspecti

a study coauthor at the university of chicago told us earlier on the for that other study showed that drug overdose cases and injuries are the leading causes of death among the unhoused. factors like having a disability, being unemployed and not having a support network are also associated with earlier deaths. >> we're currently working on looking at employment and income in this population. connections to the safety net. we'd like to eventually use these data to learn whether safety net programs like medicaid, like medicaid expansion, whether that actually be improved outcomes or reduce mortality risk. >> the study also analyzed death rates in california, for which had the highest homeless rate of any state last year. and it found that homeless people living in california had a similar risk of dying early as most other states. another swap of israeli hostages and palestinian prisoners. the hope that the temporary peace can continue. also, a reminder, our annual ktvu one warm coat drive is now in its final week. we are looking for those new or gently worn coats to help keep bay area f

the term shadow docket was coined around 2015 by university of chicago law scholar, actually conservative one named will bodie and at the time he kind of meant a little bit more descriptively rather than normatively. you have kind done a lot and played a big role in popularizing or explaining the term. and your books are really revelatory. could you start a little bit by you know, giving us a brief history of how this docket has always and yet how it's used has expanded significantly in the century? sure. i mean, i wrote book really to help get everyone on the same page about how the supreme court basically one does its job, but two has come to play such an outsized role in so many features, contemporary public discourse. and know the shadow docket is really a big part of that. all it is is this evocative shorthand, basically, for all of the procedural orders that the supreme court hands down procedural orders, many of which are entirely anodyne, but some of which are not. and so one of the most common types of orders, the supreme court hands down, is an order either agreeing to hear an a

but uva and university of chicago did pretty well. i think taking your money and putting it in more experimental and cheaper ways of doing higher education is a good way to go. and being aware of the lesser-known, technological colleges that have great records on free-speech, sending your kid there instead of expecting them to be the 16th generation harvard graduate, think that would be a good outcome for all of us. matt: one of the interesting things about your co-author is they are from gen z and that turns out to be surprisingly resilient when it comes to free speech and cancel culture. different than the millennials above them. talk about that in the waning 2-3 minutes. greg: one of the interesting things to learn is that the population that hates cancel culture the most is not boomers or gen x, the best generation, course, it is millennials. that stereotype is true in terms of having the most anti-free-speech views. but gen z hates cancel culture the most. they grew up with it and they are sick of it. they don't wanted it to keep

i prefer the students have said about their campuses, but that the university of chicago they have upheldalue of hearing these diverse points of view so that when the graduates go out into the world they can become leaders and they know what people will be saying on multiple sides of issues. so we have to maintain that value. >> ms. burdett, do you have anything to add? >> of course. i mean, universities have harder jobs than any of us in this room because they have to teach people how to think, not tell them what to think. and we haven't really mastered that. they are chartered. their mission is too great a platform that students, including some of the young people in the sewing room and jewish students have their perspective and their voices and that's how we learn. i don't think for one minute there's a university that doesn't know what's right and wrong when it comes to come is a mosque, was hamas in that massacre? like they have a very hard job and the agreed, in 1967 the university of chicago issued that calvin principles which is still a very influential document, and they protecte