a part of that tit-for-tat _ become. a part of that tit-for-tat nature - become.for-tat nature is i become. a part of that - tit-for-tat nature is returning tit—for—tat nature is returning the houthis to a list of global terrorist organisations, is it? and what does that mean for the houthis in practical terms? that's right. earlier on wednesday the white house announcing that the duties will be redesignated as a global terrorist organisation. they previously had a similar label that was lifted, that was revoked in 2021. this means basically that, you know, the houthis are under additional sanctions, anyone who does business with them also find themselves under sanctions. the white house, washington hopes that this will interrupt the flow of weapons and make it more difficult, put more pressure on the houthis. but i think the big question now is really what comes next? because when the us and the uk and those other nations launch those other nations launch those straight, one week ago, they really only had two objectives, one was to dissuade the goodies from wanti

. lines being drawn, and there is a lot of tit-for-tat._ lines being drawn, and there is a lot of tit-for-tat a lot of friendly _ lot of tit-for-tat. there seems to be a lot of friendly fire _ lot of tit-for-tat. there seems to be a lot of friendly fire going - lot of tit-for-tat. there seems to be a lot of friendly fire going on. | be a lot of friendly fire going on. we are now getting more public criticism from the conservative bunches of rishi sunak. apparently two conservative mps have called for him to go, andrea jenkyns and simon clarke, but behind the scenes there is a lot of murmuring and discontent, especially over the direction of the government and simon clarke in it. as well as using very dramatic language about electoral massacre and avoidable annihilation as he puts it,... puts it, . .. they puts it,... they were very much vocally supporting the prime minister at pmqs but when you talk about tit—for—tat it was interesting that rishi sunak tried to turn the tables by suggesting discontent in the labour party about sir keir starmer. he quoted one labour mpjon cruddas who has writt

indeed, so we can expect the tit for tat between the us and j the tit for tat between the us and thehe houthis on the other but i think the real perilous aspect is at the houthis will retaliate even more against global shipping so until now, they have struck vessels that they said were linked to israel. now from their perspective, vessels linked to the us and uk and other countries are part of this coalition are fair game as well and we should remember the houthis themselves decide what constitutes a us linked vessel in the uk linked vessel so they can essentially pick any vessel inside at a british linked vessel or a us linked vessel. so that's one aspect and in the other aspect is that this will inspire other militias or other groups around the world to conduct a similar attacks against global shipping because they said, look at the houthis, they are getting so much attention, enormous attention from the us and uk in the globalised economy and so we will do that too. find globalised economy and so we will do that too. �* , ., ., ., globalised economy and so we will do that too. �* i

at j concern for tit—for—tat.atting. in other words, does not like western central banks keep their money in russia so that they cannot do this reciprocally. to the extent that they are threatening western businesses with assets in russia, russia has already started expropriating was businesses liable for this ever happen. i wasjust in liable for this ever happen. i was just in davos meeting with executives from hyundai the korean car company and they had a 3,000,000,000—dollar car manufacturing operation in st. petersburg —— st. petersburg goes expropriated. same thing with other companies as well. so the idea that we should be worried but western companies losing their assets in russia is really not a reasonable explanation for not doing this. some i also wanted to ask you is whilst you work there in switzerland, we had the iowa caucuses here in the united states. we saw a decisive victory for president trump in those caucuses. watching this, president putin of russia, what do you think he made a fat? putin is l

there is always i concern about tit-for-tat, in concern about tit—for—tat, in this case it would be illo do the tatting. it is not like western central banks keep their money in russia so they can't do it reciprocally to the extent they are threatening businesses that have assets in russia, russia has experimenting those businesses long before this happened. at davos i was meeting with executives from hyundai, and they had a car manufacturing business in saint petersburg expropriated. the same thing is happening with many other companies. that idea we should be worried about western countries that make companies losing their assets in russia is not a reasonable explanation for not doing this.— for not doing this. there was something — for not doing this. there was something else _ for not doing this. there was something else i _ for not doing this. there was something else i wanted - for not doing this. there was something else i wanted to l for not doing this. there was i something else i wanted to ask you, while you are there in switzerland, we had the iowa caucuses here in the us, we

so this was a tit—for—tat by iran, they say it is a judicial decision. tit—for—tat by iran, they saythey say it is a judicial decision. i don't think the us is going to want to deal with this right now. the fifth fleet did not react to this. the ship is currently in an iranian port. the crew are a filipino and one greek, and they have part of that problem. right now the immediate problem is the houthis in the red sea, which is driving up commodity prices, forcing ships to travel all the way round the far side of africa, putting ten days onto the trip and adding $2 million each time, so we have to deal with it one way or the other, if the houthis went back down. that brin . s if the houthis went back down. that brinus us if the houthis went back down. that brings us to — if the houthis went back down. that brings us to the _ if the houthis went back down. that brings us to the politics, frank gardner, thank you very much indeed. let's bring in our political editor, chris mason, who has been patiently waiting. what are you hearing tonight about the plans are being set out? let tonight

in a tit-for-tat the prime minister _ people want? the prime minister focused on - people want? in a tit-for-tat the | prime minister focused on labour prime ministerfocused on labour criticism of keir starmer. his prime minister focused on labour criticism of keir starmer.- criticism of keir starmer. his own -a now criticism of keir starmer. his own party now realises _ criticism of keir starmer. his own party now realises he _ criticism of keir starmer. his own party now realises he simply - criticism of keir starmer. his own | party now realises he simply does not have — party now realises he simply does not have a — party now realises he simply does not have a plan for this country. the member for dagenham and rainham said it _ the member for dagenham and rainham said it is _ the member for dagenham and rainham said it is difficult to identify the purpose — said it is difficult to identify the purpose of his leadership. the prime minister left — purpose of his leadership. the prime minister left it _ purpose of his leadership. the

is there concern of tit for tat with russia? >> there is always concern of tit for tat.this case it would be ill-founded because the russians don't have the ability to do the "tatting." it's not like western central banks keep their money in russia. so they cannot do it reciprocally. and to the extent they are threatening western businesses that have assets in russia, russia has already started appropriating those businesses long before this ever happened. i was just in davos meeting with executives from hyundai and they had a $3 billion car operation in same petersburg expropriated. the same with carlsbad brewing and many other companies. so the idea we should be worried about western companies losing their assets in russia is really not a reasonable explanation for not doing this. helena: something else i wanted to ask, whilst you were there in switzerland we had the iowa caucuses in the united states. we saw a decisive victory for president trump in those caucuses. watching this, president putin of russia, what do you think he made of that? >> putin is looking at trum

had stopped for the moment. tit-for-tat had stopped for the moment. , tit-for-tat had stopped for the,, . tit-for-tat had stopped for the moment. ., ., , moment. those are the indications, es. on moment. those are the indications, yes- on both _ moment. those are the indications, yes. on both sides _ moment. those are the indications, yes. on both sides perhaps - moment. those are the indications, yes. on both sides perhaps there i moment. those are the indications, i yes. on both sides perhaps there was an attempt to see this or to portray this as a limited, almost policing operation that in the case of attacks conducted by pakistan, highly unusual attacks on iranians soil, and yet iran pointed out in its reporting that no iranians nationals have been killed, and when iran carried out its attacks on pakistani soil, it also emphasised that no pakistani citizens had been targeted. so i think this is something which perhaps both sides have an interest in minimising. i think the response by pakistan was inevitable and i suspect that iran knew that and perhaps took that into account. if t

we begin with the tit for tat strikes between iran and pakistan. earlier today, pac has done his alleged militant hideout inside to run in a series of where a teller 3 attacks is learn about says it targeted bases of biology, separate test inside the run. all of this followed in a brand new and asked dr. targeting terrorist impact is done, both countries are accusing the of us, of hovering separatist, find his villagers assessing the damage. this footage appears to show the aftermath of the pakistani strike on the rounds border region. iranian state, medias say at least 9 people were killed there on thursday. is lama, but has confirmed, carried out the attacks i this morning focused on and it took a series of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision, military strikes against terrorist, how high adults and sis donald. but it was just on probing of feet on a number of terrace, or killed during the intelligence based operation. the strikes in the ran in border region offices done and baluchistan, our a response to a runs attacks inside p

the, the, the dw dues line from berlin tonight in pakistan and iran watching tit for tat air strikes against each other. pakistan says it attacked militant hyde out in iran, in retaliation for iranian strikes within its borders just a day earlier. also coming up tonight, medicine and aid, arriving for the people of gossip. the shipment of supplies is desperately needed, but there is no lit up in the fighting. at least 16 people from one family were killed in an air strike that destroyed their home. in rough on the brink off is good to have you with as we begin with the tit for tat here strikes between iran and pakistan. earlier today, pakistan his elegibility at high belt inside the iran in a series of retaliatory attacks is lama bod says, with a targeted bases of beloved chee separatist inside iran. and all of this followed and a rainy and here's drawing, targeting, so called terrorist inside pakistan. both countries are choosing the other of harboring separatist finders. villagers assessing the damage. this footage appears to show the aftermath of the pakistani strike on the rounds

do you think this tit for tat is going to _ this tit for tat is going to continue and end up with a much i continue and end up with a much wider escalation?— continue and end up with a much wider escalation? i think that's one concern that _ wider escalation? i think that's one concern that many _ wider escalation? i think that's one concern that many folks _ wider escalation? i think that's one concern that many folks have - wider escalation? i think that's one concern that many folks have but i | concern that many folks have but i also think— concern that many folks have but i also think the president is right. iran does— also think the president is right. iran does not want to see a full on kinetic_ iran does not want to see a full on kinetic conflict with the west. that is not _ kinetic conflict with the west. that is not as— kinetic conflict with the west. that is not as in— kinetic conflict with the west. that is not as in its interests. so, i think— is not as in its interests. so, i think what— is not as in its interests. so, i think what the us in the uk and the coalition— think

with this, we begin with the tit for tat air strikes between the ron and pakistan. earlier today, pakistan hit alleged mil within high belt inside the ron and a series of retaliatory attacks as lama bon says, that it targeted bases of below cheat separatist inside the rod. now all of this followed and a rainy in here strike targeting when he calls terrorist inside pakistan. both countries are accusing the other of harboring separatist fighters. villagers assessing the damage. this footage appears to show the aftermath of the pakistani strike on the rounds border region. your ran in state media say at least 9 people were killed there on thursday. is lama, but has confirmed it carried out the attacks i this morning focused on and it took a series of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision, military strikes against terrorist, how high adults and says donald, but it was just on probing. well, if you don't know what of total risk or killed during the intelligence based operation, the strikes in the ran in border region of cis donnen baluchistan, our a resp

the, the, this is the given the news line from to the packets don and ron launch tit for tat a strikes against each other. pakistan says that the tank to move to the hot out, seen around in retaliation for a rainy and strikes within its borders. just died, also coming up a stand off and state of emergency and including drug gangs clashing with security forces. a prosecutor investigating the storming of a t v station by narcotics traffic is, has been shock date and medicine. an item arrived for the people of casa shipment and supplies is desperately needed, but there's no list house in the flashing. at least 16 people from one family been killed in the strength of the story. the home address, the anatomy, how it welcome to the program. we begin with the tit for tat a strikes between around and pack is done earlier today, practice done here, alleged a militant hide out inside a run in a series of retailer tree. it attacks rather is on the bad. it says it target advices of by lucky separatist inside a run. all of this followed and the writing an extract targeting terrorists impact of stoc

so i think this is a deadly tit—for—tat aerial sense, this is a deadly tit—for—tat aerialsense, but this in tandem with what goes on on the front line, when you have led amir putin as you say saying he will never retreat, i don't think anyone expected him to say otherwise but certainly there were fears russia had been stockpiling missiles as we approached the new year's celebrations but that moment has already arrived. for more on the respective attacks from russia and ukraine, the bbc spoke to military expert and former us marines chief of staff in europe, colonel brendan kearney. the russians from the very beginning of this conflict, have made a real practice of waging a war of terror on the ukrainian civilians. and they have just consistently, i ukrainian civilians. and they havejust consistently, i mean the evidence is overwhelming, targeted hospitals, churches, schools you name it, everything except the tactical targets most militaries would actively go after. so there is nothing different and what the russians are doing. i think the ukrainians have made an emphasis very selectively

the the, this is dw news live from berlin tonight, pakistan and the ron launching tit for tat air strikes against each other. pakistan says an attack from milton high belts in iran, in retaliation for it, raining and strikes within its borders just a day earlier. also coming up tonight, medicine and aid arrive for the people of gauze of the shipment of supplies is desperately needed, but there is no lit up in the fighting. at least 16 people from one family were killed in an air strikes that destroyed their home. in rough up plus a stand off in state of emergency and ecuador, drug games clashing with security forces. and they prosecutor investigating the storming of a tv station by narcotics traffickers, has been shot dead. and here in germany and growing calls to band the far wide political party a f d, a party that is now the 2nd most popular in the country. the i bring golf, our viewers watching on tv, as in the united states. and to all of you around the world, welcome, we begin with the tit for tat air strikes between iran and pakistan. earlier today, pakistan hit alleged militant, h

so why this apparent military tit for tat and why is pakistan? recall, defend basket from a rod. why has his mom a bunch of splendid, all high level visits from tehran tonight, a region of the world that has long been a powder keg? is this a new spark? i broke off in berlin. this is the day i or the morning pockets on and the 2 can see these of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision, military strikes against terrorist, how high dogs and says donald, for those just on probing all feet on. so these attacks including stuckey stand in iraq and iran. you have also with this type of lising ethics on the region. our region does not need to more problems and conflicts just shows just how dangerous the situation is in the wider middle east. also it coming out to the far right and you have the political party is now germany's 2nd most popular party that is just one of the reasons thousands of people are protesting the rise of the far right. and i think it is the duty of all of us to be hit today against the if the against hatred and rabble rousing hits the most of those. we

it a tit-for-tat action to a wider more serious escalation?d require one or other— serious escalation? it would require one or other parties, _ serious escalation? it would require one or other parties, the _ serious escalation? it would require one or other parties, the us - serious escalation? it would require one or other parties, the us or- serious escalation? it would require one or other parties, the us or iran | one or other parties, the us or iran to decide that they were going to escalate this particular set of actions, into something wider, and the very clear evidence is that neither party wants to do that and therefore we may have arrived at a level of violence that we are going to live with for some time but won't necessarily escalate.— necessarily escalate. general sir richard thank _ necessarily escalate. general sir richard thank you _ necessarily escalate. general sir richard thank you for _ around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other stories making news. government borrowing in december was l

military targets -- i know you're saying we don't want to get into a tit for tat.hat's already begun. and how does the u.s. respond at that point? >> well, you know, we say we don't want to escalate, and that's important. we don't want to escalate. what we want to do is cut off the escalation. we want to take away their ability to retaliate. and we want to re-establish deterrence. so, as much as we can do, we're going to take out the assets that they might be considering or they might use for retaliation. and we're going to do it in a way that is proportionate to the increased risk of the larger picture, not just the risk of one missile coming at us, but what it means for global shipping in the red sea. so, proportionate response here means heavier than what comes at us in order to cap it off and stop it. that's what we -- i'm assuming that's what we're planning to do. that's what we did with the early set of strikes. and they were obviously pretty effective because, despite the valid intent to retaliate right away, not much happened. >> yeah. last weekend we had t

but what you may end up with is a tit—for—tat situation and just to be clear, there are no plans, aswaiting to see what the houthis do next, and if the houthis do do something they will have to respond militarily again, but in the same way they have been doing, using air strikes. and as we've seen in israel, in gaza, rather, when israel has been conducting a bombing campaign for months, and intense, unprecedented bombing campaign and it still hasn't able to defeat the mindset of hamas and i think that, you know, that will be the exact same problem that the us and its coalition, which includes the uk, will face when they are trying to get the houthis to back down. find will face when they are trying to get the houthis to back down. and we have seen that _ get the houthis to back down. and we have seen that with _ get the houthis to back down. and we have seen that with the _ get the houthis to back down. and we have seen that with the houthis - have seen that with the houthis themselves, haven't we? they have endured and lasted through nine years bombing in the war with the saudi led c

finally we have seen some to for tat between nikki haley and i for tat between nikki haley and donaldthe campaign going forward? you know the answer to that, when does - the campaign going forward? you know the answer to that, when does donald i the answer to that, when does donald trump not attack his components? i will not sit lightly, donald trump is a racist in the way he had sex nikki haley, and he knows he is racist, because she would be the first indian president, nikki haley, if she is finally beginning, if she had gone soft on trump and trump voters, she's going after him on issues and questions of character, so the more it becomes, as it were, and exchange between desantis trump and exchange between desantis trump and haley, in place to her advantage, does it give her the ossett if you jump? no, but a better chance of doing so in the weeks ahead. ~ ., chance of doing so in the weeks ahead. . . ., ahead. we will leave it there, scott lucas, ahead. we will leave it there, scott lucas. thank _ ahead. we will leave it there, scott lucas, thank you _ ahead. we will leave it there

the, the, the practice, the tardy side. tit for tat strikes against the really entire tree with local official saying 7 civilians have been killed. also ahead the us bombs further sites in yemen. tough to the hoops, the rebels group, the target, some american ship, and the red sea. speaking exclusively to our, to south africa's top of the diplomatic tasks why western countries are turning a blind eye to what victoria calls at genocide and gals it while they preach to the rest of the world. so pretty that countries that often electra us about how we must hopes of democracy, international and important instruments. and the very one that announcing don't use the, the wherever you're catching the news our from across the world today. welcome to moscow to arching international or developing breaking news story this thursday morning. pakistan has confirmed that it's carried, i'd strikes against the really entire tree, as i'm about to say, is it targeted quote, terrorist cells in the neighboring country. this on verified for the district living a line, reportedly shows the aftermath solve th

is this tit for tat situation?ll ask congressman russel fry next. ♪ jake time for this day in history, american built. on january 9, 2007, steve jobs introduced apple's first iphone. the 4 gigabyte model cost $499 and 8 gig model cost $599. now you know, january 9, 2007. don't forget to watch american built on mondays, 8:00 p.m. eastern only on fox business prime. quick check of the markets and dow is down more than 200 points, 229 to be precise. modest loss for the nasdaq and s&p. mike murphy with me with his stock picks. first off, tesla. >> tesla. so year-to-date it's pulled back about 6% and this is a opportunity here in the mid 230s to own the stock if you never have before pulled back from 260 in the last week of the in 2023. there's a quick upside here. long term and this knock on mus and can personal acts, whatever the story broke and this is an easy trade, i think, but long term this is a company that's re-inventing the auto industry. stuart: all the industries on musk himself and not a problem for the sto

was this a tit-for-tat operation? frank: it was exactly that, yes.ship, which was carrying 145,000 tons of fuel oil, crude oil from basra on the way to turkey, the same ship was impounded last year by the u.s. carrying a million barrels of oil because the u.s. accused ship and iran of smuggling oil to china against sanctions. this is a tit-for-tat by iran, they say judicial decision. i don't think the u.s. will want to deal with this right now. the ship is currently in an iranian port. the crew is filipino, one greek. they have pa of that problem. right now the immediate problem is the houthis in the red sea which is driving up commodity prices, forcing ships to travel all around africa, adding 10 days to the trip, adding $2 million each time. they have to deal with it one way or the other. christian: that brings us to the politics. thank you. let's bring in chris mason who has been waiting for us. what are you hearing tonight about the plans that are being set out? chris: let me talk you through what we know in factual terms and what i think is reas

the unborn golf is good to have you with this we begin with the tit for tat air strikes .

done by the clock as time carries the tit for tat strikes against a reunion to retreat with local officials. thing 7 civilian, something killed. also, it had on the us, bolton's further sites in the m, and after the who t rebel group target sound, american ship and the red seat while speaking exclusively to r t. so don't forget the top, typically not groups go in her countries law suits against israel with a legit genocide of gals. there is a terrible, terrible smell to that is underway in casa people unprotected. the innocence of being killed, women and children, public institutions that should provide support in health. just being estimates on the russian military stays at scale more than 16 foreign mercenaries, mostly french nationals with a high precision strike. the problem must go to the world. this is our to international food to have your company this thursday. we begin with breaking news pockets down. how's the car died? strikes against? are we in the entire tree? this on verified funded circulating on line reportedly shows the aftermath of the blast, the deputy governor of the sou

yeah. radians to say, tit for tat were done, do not escalate and, and they got the job done. right. so that would be your anticipation. a strike in iran against a specific target is not necessarily on iranian territory if you'd be outside of iran, but i do think they need to send a strong message with that escalating to the war. so how does the president walk that line? right, they want to, they want to create insurance with that. and although, or which has been a main goal for the united states from the beginning of this conflict which started back on october 7, primary goal do not escalate into regional battle. and as we're so close now have you seen this week in paris where there's this hostages for a cease fire, at least a 2 month pause and the fighting in gaza. we're getting close. and the last the present by and wants to do is blow up. you know, another front in the middle east as we're reaching potential peace between these rallies and ha, right? so the, the group responsible. all that is claiming responsibility for this is one of these umbrella groups for what, why be regard

so tit for tat exchanges. between iran and israel, has there been some serious exchanges of files like tit for tat retaliation between israel and to ron? and whether or not this latest incident has to do anything with that. and those developments or not to this question has to be seen in the coming perhaps hours or days. but what's clear is that this hospital is very significant in the fact that the sense that it hosts a significant number of 4 and tourist, apart from being a hospital, providing some medical services to about 4 and visitors, medical tourists from mountain and walk and other neighboring countries around here on it also has a hotel, a 21 story hotel that has around 120 suites for the families of the patients or the patients themselves to accommodate those people coming from other parts of the region to yvonne to receive medical treatment so this makes this hospital, judy khan, this latest incident unique. so i'm going to stay here, ask the yvonne need officials at the seed here on a will update

because there is a danger that this tit—for—tat situation will continue and that doesn't seem to be anygy inside. when those strikes, those co—ordinated, large—scale strikes were carried out, the us and its allies are said that two objectives were, firstly, to dissuade the houthi is from carrying out the attacks on racy shipping and secondly, to degrade their capabilities to do so. now, it appears that both of those objectives haven't really been successful. the attacks continues albeit a smaller scale. the attacks continues albeit a smallerscale. i the attacks continues albeit a smaller scale. i think many will be asking what next? the other development is the us state department has moved to name the houthi is as a designated global terrorist group, talk us through, what is a significant of that move? that's right, the nines men came a few hours after these later strikes and i think that the us is hoping that this will put pressure on the houthi's and also put pressure on those that support them, those that fund them and somehow cut off the supply of weapons to the houthi's. now, this

response has been measured, it's not been an emotional or irrational response, there but a a tit for tat response slowly climbing the escalation ladder uh while you know exerting pressure of its own within the region that's causing uh anxiety to its. okay uh what can we look at uh in the terms of probabilities of uh targeted assassinations to continue? mean at this point uh we've seen um i should i should say target assassinations and or terrorist uh to continue based on the trend that we've seen in the past few days, do you think that this is going to be uh something that will continue? uh, i do think that the israelis will continue with their terrorist activities through targeting certain personalities and certain individuals, that will definitely continue in the short future, because until today uh that did not achieve the target. that israel has set for itself until they achieve either a political end or a military and they will continue with this, so i do believe that we need to be very active in combatting this capability, and at the same time we need to very strongly search for th

we don't want to be in a tit for tat indefinite they shoot some missiles, we drop some bombs. they shoot some missiles, we drop some bombs. that's not the way to handle this. so we've given plenty of warning we don't want escalation. so they're still defiant, the next time got to be bigger, got to be boulder strike, got to be more comprehensive strike, got to take away not their will but their capabilities to interfere with the shipping. that's the real goal here. you know, we've apologized for two months saying that we don't want escalation. we don't want escalation. we've said that enough. when it comes to it and you have to use military force, you have to use it effectively, and that means getting the escalation dominance. so we cut off their ability. and we can largely do that against sea targets. and they're going to try to lay mines. they're going to use unmanned surface vehicles. they're going to try to get unmanned undersea vehicle. they're going to get information from iran. all that's part of our understanding, and we'll put a campaign plan together, just give us the

now since then, the situation has basically descended into a kind of tit—for—tat where the houthis firew these fresh strikes came a few hours after a us—owned vessel, a bulk carrier, was hit by a drone fired from houthi—controlled territory in yemen. the us military said that that ship was seaworthy, although it was damaged, and continued itsjourney. now the big question now, of course, is what happens next? because when those large scale, those coordinated strikes were launched last thursday, the us and its allies said that they had two objectives in that. the first one was to dissuade the houthis from carrying out further attacks on red sea shipping. the second one was to degrade their capabilities to do so. now, one week on, it would appear that they're not really having much success in either of those. attacks on shipping in the red sea continue, albeit on a smaller scale. and that begs the question, what is the way out of this? what is the exit strategy to ensure the us does not get embroiled in a regional war and ensure that the situation, this tit—for—tat, does not continue? we e

tit-for-tat going on here, who's likely to benefit from that?it from that? thanks so much for having me, it's - likely to benefit from that? thanks so much for having me, it's great l likely to benefit from that? thanks | so much for having me, it's great to be with you. i think that it'll be a close race in new hampshire, between donald trump and nikki haley. and really they are wanting i—2 — but trump has a considerable lead, about 15 percentage points at this point. so if they keep going back and forth trading insults, it seems like we are probably more likely to just gravitate towards the status quo, which is trump winning in new hampshire and essentially creating a streamlined path for him to take the nomination. so i do think it would take something quite exceptional for nikki haley to have an upset — but she may claim victory regardless if she may claim victory regardless if she has a strong second—place, saying this is enough momentum to go into south carolina.— into south carolina. there is still a lot to into south carolina. there is s

at least it will put the onus of responding back and stop the for tat. it'll put the onus back on the cooties. >> you are saying, there's so much at stake here. this is a huge shipping channel, mercer says they will pause operation there, you're saying the u.s. navy should actually be considering looking at where the houthis are launching from and attack that area, so that they never get off dry land, is that sort of what you are saying? >> take it out. take them out. be prepared to take out the launching sites for the drones. the factories where the drones are produced and so forth. we are holding targets on this, it's just a question of what the policy will be. and we have signaled clearly that we don't want to escalate, so if they wanted to avoid the escalation, they wouldn't keep doing what they are doing, so they must be inviting us to do something, and when we hold back and say no, please don't make us respond, we are actually encouraging more strikes, and that will ultimately result in tragedy, i think. so we have the superior power in the region.

we not here to play a tit-for-tat game with iran on their terms.argue if we haven't done the proper analysis to determine why we weren't able to stop this attack drone from impacting one of our outposts in jordan, then i think a retaliatory strike that would potentially put our soldiers at further risk wouldn't be the adequate response. we also have to bear in mind, todd, not all of our responses needs to be equal, kinetic. we can look at the non-kinetic elms of further economic sanctions. stop the billion dollars in fungible income that joe biden has provided, which is funding these types of attacks. stop the actual increase in oil exportation that is being refined in china and start actually putting back the trump policy that sanctioned and nearly crippled all of iran. and so while i agree that we should have an equal and a very, very direct response, we must ensure the safety of our troops first and not get into a tit-for-tat where our soldiers are playing catch with missiles rockets and attack drones. >> todd: understood. finally an israeli dos

in a tit-for-tat the — listening to what people want? prime minister focused on labour criticism of keir starmer. ihis focused on labour criticism of keir starmer. , ., , . ., starmer. his own party are now realisina starmer. his own party are now realising that _ starmer. his own party are now realising that he _ starmer. his own party are now realising that he simply - starmer. his own party are now realising that he simply doesn'ti realising that he simply doesn't have a — realising that he simply doesn't have a plan for this country, mr speaken — have a plan for this country, mr speaker. the member for dagenham and reynard _ speaker. the member for dagenham and reynard said it is difficult for him to find _ reynard said it is difficult for him to find the — reynard said it is difficult for him to find the purpose of his leadership.— to find the purpose of his leadershi -. ~ , leadership. the prime minister left it to his allies _ leadership. the prime minister left it to his allies to _ leadership. the prime minister left it to his a

the little gear limitation says this to, to do on both of the pockets time carries the tit for tat strikes against the are really in tara trade with local officials. think 7 civilian something kills also a head on the us balls further sites in the m and talk to the who t rebel group target, send american ship and the red seat while speaking exclusively to archie. so don't forget the top diplomatic greek style in her country's law suits against israel with a legit genocide of gals. is a terrible, terrible smell to that is underway in casa people and protect.

well i think that we're in the cycle of tit for tat retaliation. israel, his, by israel ever on, of course we have the situation with these uh, in the red sea. and so, uh, we're seeing, you know, that, uh, uh, that one strike leads to another strike and, and back and forth. so far the, no, none of the parties is look for escalation, but it's likely that we're going to see a continuation of these kinds of re, uh, retaliatory moves right there out 1st in from the mid at least institute in washington dc. thank you. as the u. s. military says several soldiers of the names adding a mess file attack on an ad base in western iraq. united states central command says you run back militants launched multiple miss 1000 rockets on the left side database. it said that most of the projectiles way intercepted about some struck the facility. the us military has space to thousands of attacks by tara allied fights is in iraq and syria. since the, these are all have lost for stats. i didn't know till about those attacks and say we got a new racks. come, i made open divisions between each route and its closes

well i think that we're in the cycle of tit for tat retaliation. israel, his, by israel ever on, of course we have the situation with these uh, in the red sea. and so, uh, we're seeing, you know, that, uh, uh, that one strike leads to another strike and, and back and forth. so far the no, none of the parties is look for escalation. uh, but uh, but it's likely that we're going to see a continuation of these kinds of re retaliatory moves. right there out 1st in from the middle east institute in washington dc. thank you. the u. s. military says several soldiers, i've been injured at any mess, a lot talk and i had base in western iraq. united states central command says the round back minutes ends launched multiple ms 1000 rockets on the outside database. it said that most of the projects i was waiting to separate, but some struck the facility. the us mitre has face to thousands of attacks by to around allies fights as rock and syria says that these are all how my support staff that in october. now those attacks in syria and your acts come i'm, it opened divisions between these are all and it'

if they do, is there a sense there that we're heading into a tit for tat escalation us? well, i think good there who is, of course, uh, vindicated by error, a public opinion that they have radically a geology and they are mazda in, i'll see metric welfare. and they were proving this in the 90 year, the war against saudi arabia when they attacked was drones. but important point installation was airports and so on it for 9 years until is sold uribe of finally gave in and start the peace negotiations. it was that was these and so we can imagine something similar happening now that they would just continue this me to the. ready policy of striking ships in the, in the, in the, in this, in the right seat. it hoping that the they will reach that goal and the ending, the war, the gaza strip. mm. green. this is clearly a dynamic situation. who knows what tomorrow will bring, but so far, i'm curious, what's been the reaction in egypt and in the wider region where this to be neighboring states on the, on the, on the red sea that is sell the rapier and egypt, saudi arabia is very he

the pakistan carries out tit for tat strikes against a ran in territory with local officials saying 9 civilians have been killed. also a has the, the us bombs additional sites in the m and claiming to target. is it the infrastructure in an apparent violation of international law? the u. s. along with the u. k. and some of its other allies have violated and trampled on every conceivable rule of international law. and, and then uses that to appear in front of the international court of justice to present arguments against the is really occupation of policy. and.

in denmark were able to hold back their tears; it would be fair to say that the entire kingdom of tats love of the people, the strength of denmark, it was with this motto that queen margrethe ii came to the throne 52 years ago. love of the people it's fair to say. that her majesty queen margrethe ii managed to retain the love of the people to this day. our boy felt anger because of social injustice and wanted to fight it, then let's give him a medal, a film about family, about love, and of course branded humor at the highest level, let's go, paris, treat the spazhrams and i really liked napoleon, napoleon bonaparte i welcome you, on fire, exciting adventures. it was unpredictable, where, let’s say, like where, in an attack, just a large-scale one, he did it, especially all these battles are right for you, very good directing, design, costume, bad, the ball was gorgeous, white dance , gentlemen have been invited for a long time, you don’t want pasha, don’t dance, what do you mean don’t dance, got up, good film, positive, i it seems that i will review it more than once, everything is in