when you think of arthel?giver or fetus carrier. so if i'm going birth giver. the correct answer is birth giver. okay come here go question number two. >> that is so inaccurate. but go ahead. what term did the left used to replace homeless with. was it people experiencing unsheltered homelessness? outdoor home, or street living? extinct. none of the above. on houston. >> yes on houston for that's what i was thinking. coxwell played i was trying it went off the three or cannot go off book here for. >> okay if that's the case which is the closest question for. >> i am going people experiencing unsheltered homelessness the long run on sentence. >> kevin you think so question three for three let's do it. >> i cannot believe it we've got to come up with hardeman's next time. [laughter] that is the right answer. >> i need a bell and need a buzzer. here we go, what term to the left replace inmate with? was it persons who are incarcerated or detained. a person who broke the law. or person not living among society pigl

it is about fairnessening arthel nailed it.a competition it should be fair i think it is unfair when you have girls competing against biological males. >> it's been over one month since president trump made this declaration. it will henceforth be official policy of the united states government that there are only two genders, male, and female. >> but it looks likes message didn't make it to colorado as the state lawmakers are introducing a bill to punish anyone who misgenders a transperson's death certificate. with the penalty being a class 2 misdemeanor in which a colorado doweled mean up to 120 days in jail, or fine of $ 750 they're not the only ones to have this type of law with california, new york, washington, oregon following suit but at least -- they don't have criminal penalties tacked on. okay. molly. >> yeah. this -- this is -- it's one thing to do something accidentally and to have a free speech issue on a lot of the scales when they talk about this issue and misjeaneddering someone and fined it takes it to another l

. ♪ hello everyone i am along with tom schlup, arthel neville and doctor marks to go bird welcome tohe big we can show. the big story tonight, president trump just took cpac by storm he took spoke to the annual gathering and was welcomed by an adoring crowd. [cheering] [cheering] usa. usa. usa. usa. >> trumped used his spatial layout all of his accomplishments as h he marks oe month in office. >> joe is the worse and believe me i'd to clean up the mess. i'm cleaning up the mess and it is a mess on the border with inflation, every single thing he touched, turned to [bleep]. the fraudsters, liars, cheaters, globalists and deep state bureaucrats are being sent packing. the illegal alien criminals are being sent home. we are draining the swamp and restoring a government by the people. we are liberating commuters like aurora, colorado and springfield, ohio. they have been occupied by illegal alien criminals from all over the world. we are rescuing the americans whose jobs have been stolen whose wages have been robbed and way of life has been absolutely destroyed. and the come under the tr

coming up in the next hour, fox news anchor arthel neville speaks to renowned musician ises about howtigation into the suspected sabotage of the undersea communication cable linking latvia and sweden. it's the second ship seized in that a investigation. the ship is norwegian but with an all-russian crew. the baltic sea has seen a string of power cable and telecom link outages since russia invaded ukraine almost three years ago. the ship's owner denies any involvement. ♪ jon: well, questions surround the flight path of that black hawk helicopter that crashed boo a jet near washington d.c. there are reports it was flying outside its approved flight path. we'll discuss this with lieutenant colonel if darren ga a ub, a renounce nouned and retired black hawk pilot, in our next hour. ♪mi ♪ ze with the money i saved i thought i'd get a wax figure of myself. oh! right in the temporal lobe! beat it, punks! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ watch your step! that's why visionworks makes it simple to schedule an eye exam that works for you. even if you have a big

[laughter] >> with a name like arthel, i like to get names right.en i was growing up the girl across the street, you cannot say -- she called me upstairs and ever since then -- yes. so since then, like i asked you, how do you say your last name? i wanted to get it right. [laughter] >> they knew and i think they were comfortable the fact that he was incapacitated democrats were in control of the country, they could do things and leave them -- as a figurehead. >> still ahead, karen bass watching an investigation into someone she knows best. ♪ with trugreen, we got a golf course quality lawn at a great price. that's when the golfers showed up. whoa... ...she's a beaut. i told ya. and because trugreen does all the work, we get more family time. did you know it was this kind of tea time? everybody knew. good luck with that. they're actually kinda helpful. and our lawn has never looked better. you playing through? pga tour quality lawns for as little as a dollar a day. fairways look great. get started at trugreen.com. (♪) now for something you can both ag

compelling interest in protecting children from arthel children online second loss during that interest is about as long as it does not burden adult access more than necessary to exclude children. and third, ashcroft per luminary application of strict scrutiny 20 years ago did not prevent courts from upholding age verification requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the justice department was arguing in favor of. and playboy and ashcroft. either of those that you ever suggest or argue that this should be a lower standard question because we didn't every one of those cases before ashcroft. sable was the first one we argue for something like scrutiny under pacifica. we know the next one weekend about pacifica and made an argument similar to the secondary offense argument my friends in texas make here. playboy will be again invoked an argument based on pacifica and justice breyer and dissents me the argument. to concede and ashcroft. >> do you think it is appropriate in this context to protecting children to c

compelling interest in protecting children from arthel children online second loss that interest is about as long as it not burden adult access more than necessary to exclude children. and third, acroft per luminary application of strict scrutiny years ago did not prevent courts from upholding age verion requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the justice department was arguing in favor of. and playboy and ashcroft. either of those that you ever suggest or argue that this be a lower standard question because we didn't every one of those c before ashcroft. sable was the one we argue for something like scrutiny under pac we know the next one weekend about pacificaade an argument similar to the secondary offense argument my friends in texas make here. playboy will be again invoked an argument based on pacifica and justice breyer and dissee the argument. to concede and ashcroft. >> do you think it is appropriatehis context to protecting children to compro the strict scrutiny? >> are not described his current term

compelling interest in protecting children from arthel dren online secon loss during that interest is about as long as it does not burden adult access more than necsa to exclude children. third, ashcroft per luminary application oftrict scrutiny 20 years ago d not prevent courts frompholding age verification requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the jusce departm was arguing inav of. and playboyoft. either of those that y ever suggest or argue that this should be a lower standard question because we didn't every one those cases before sable was the first one we argue for something like scrutiny under pacifica. we know the next one weekend about pacifica and made an argument similar to the secondary offense argument my s in texas make here. playboy w be again invoked an justice breyer and dissents me the argument. to concede and ashcroft. >> do you think it is appropriate in this context to protecting children to compromise the strict scrutiny? >> are not described his current term i would say it's appro