soure you and i brought supreme court case. the supreme court blocked me, that didn't stop me. so this lawlessness we have seen over the last four years all of a sudden democrat friends have found relegion. my colleagues on the other side say you're a threat to civil rights. the truth is you're one of the most fiercest advocates of civil rights on paper civil rights are supposed to mean protection from discrimination based on characterrist likes lake race characteristics. there's racism that exist -- it goes by a bunch of names, equity, drc, you can go on and on, but whatever you want to call it is wrong and has to stop. stop discriminating on the basis of race. that's one of the reasons i like you. i think unlike most quote, unquote major civil rights organizations today you oppose racial discrimination in all forms. so i want to ask you, is reverse racism still racism? >> thank you for the question, senator. i don't even use the term reverse racism. it's just racism to discriminate on the basis of race. >> i agree with you. >> and do civil right protections apply to all races

any other supreme court in the history of the united states and of course the supreme court rejectedhat as well. that argument has been made. it will sail again today as it already has in front of federal court. >> subject to the jurisdiction. a narrow qualification that only accepted three specific classes of persons from citizenship. can you tell us what those three classics were and why they do not imply the immigrants. >> it is very clear. the supreme court cleared. subject to the jurisdiction thereof apply to two groups. one with the children of diplomats for the obvious reason for the united states does not want their child born in the u.s. to be a citizen and their situation is representing a foreign power. protecting the embassy itself. only the real discussion they had the they suggested to the 14th amendment and they pointed out in many discussions that the indians were sovereign powers but then we had treaty relations who were not subject to u.s. law they had their own tribal courts in laws and at that time they wanted to be excluded and they did not want them to be automa

supreme court after hearing arguments of next week allows mexico to pursue a legal remedy in the u.s.ourt system? advocates like keane are worried to. >> it would mean the destruction of the second amendment in the united states. it would bankrupt the industry. >> reporter: congress passed the protection of lawful commerce in arms act in 2005. to prevent gun companies from being held liable for misuse of their products. but mexico argues the law provides no protection for businesses engaged in unlawful commerce and arms. and alleges that is what the manufacturers have been doing. by selling to dealers mexico claim to the manufacturers knew were preferred by the cartels. a group of blue state attorneys are backing mexico saying the law is meant only to shield blameless manufacturers and sellers but that it doesn't equate to blanket absolute immunity against any and all liability. in another coalition led by republican montana attorney general austen knutson argues it isn't the manufacturer's fault that gun crime is raging out of control in mexico pointing the finger elsewhere. >> this

he explains the power of the supreme court. breaking down the idea that the supreme court has ever not been politicized. as the nominees are put forth by political actors, and then they decided political questions. if you are frustrated about the supreme court come and you should be. there's a lot of reasons to be frustrated about how it works, how it conducts its business, how nontransparent it is, then the only branch of government that can actually change it, whether it is the number of open supreme court hearings, the number of justices on the supreme court, is congress. so you will need political actors to get into the politics -- involved in the politics of the supreme court. even if you like to think of it as a neutral arbiter, it never has been. host: who is matt fuller, and why does he think the myth that the media wants to polarize us? guest: matt fuller is the washington editor for not notice, where he is the long-time capitol hill beat reporter. he has an interesting connection with a lot of tea party members. membe

i do not care what the supreme court ruled i'm not talking about the supreme court.me court in many ways has to make things work. i am talking about what is your constitution provide? your constitution not a supreme court in the 40s and so forth. your constitution. it provides none of this. now, the power of purse they gave to congress not unelected judges. they are not the executive. the legislature makes spending determinations. but does it? what is an omnibus bill? at the massive spending bill the particulars of which nobody knows. and then it goes to the bureaucracy. i has no place in our constitutional construct. you have people who are mid-level bureaucrats lower level bureaucrats may be manager bureaucrats making decisions about hundreds of billions of dollars in where that money is supposed to go for it is out the framers had in mind? of course is not what they had in mind. that's not anything close to a constitutional construct that they or anybody else was contemplating. okay, next question. does congress have the power to bankrupt the country? under the sp

will the supreme court weigh in? well get to that question. >> dana: a judge striking down an arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote. andy mccarthy is here to weigh in. >> the key provisions of this bill we want to make sure that only citizens are voting in our elections. this is an issue that our citizens overwhelmingly support. total beets, america's best-selling beets brand, is available at walmart. total beets blood pressure support soft chews contain a key ingredient clinically shown to deliver two times better blood pressure support. take control of your health. head to walmart and get total beets blood pressure support soft chews today. narrator: at this very moment, children at st. jude are fighting to survive. with a gift right now, you can join the battle to save lives. katy: without st. jude, i don't know where we would be. can we see snuggles? they have given children with cancer, like my winston, a chance. christine: she has neuroblastoma. and it has spread to her liver. i try to enjoy every

ruled i don'otti' care, i amm not talking the supreme court. t has to makem things work. m i am talking about what is yours constitution provide, your constitution. not some supreme court in thet 1940s and so forth. your constitution and a producto and it providevis none of this. another power of the person of the given to, not unelected judges and not the executive, t the legislaturhee make spending determinations. but does it? an ominous bill, it is a massive spending bill, the particulars was nobody knows.of and then w it goes to bureaucra. bureaucracy. i has no place in our constitutional construct. you have people who are mid-level bureaucrats lower level bureaucrats may be manager bureaucrats making decisions about hundreds of billions of dollars in where that money is supposed to go for it is out the framers had in mind? of course is not what they had in mind. that's not anything close to a constitutional construct that they or anybody else was contemplating. okay, next question. does congress have the power to bankrupt the country? under

a lot going on at the supreme court and beyond. very excited court and beyond.r capacity to care is unmatched. you need patty. patty needs a retirement plan. work with principal so we can help you with a plan that's right for patty. let our expertise round out yours. you might know harbor freight for affordability. you might not know performance and durability go along with it. we test. and then we test again. now it's time to put us to the test. whatever you do, do it for less at harbor freight. (♪♪) the wildlife series that started them all is back. join us every saturday morning on nbc for mutual of omaha's wild kingdom: protecting the wild. and celebrate conservation success stories. stream all episodes on peacock or nbc.com up to 60%. >> on unlimited. >> home cleanings, which. >> means never again must i polish my own poop. >> treat your. >> inner monarch to convenient, affordable. home cleanings at. >> i tip it. >> be well. >> messes happen every day in every way. >> but who wants to drag out that bulky vacuum? hey, folks, joe fowler here with my favorite

trump administration would follow an order that does not go their way, even if it comes from the supreme court. some officials have left that an open question. so our colleague john fritzy, he reports that there is a self-consciousness on the part of the court not wanting to sort of antagonize president trump. now, the state of the union provides really this unique opportunity, because it's one of the rare times where the president of the united states comes in contact with some of the justices. now, i also want to note that the supreme court has not always consistently sided with trump. yes, they gave him that enormous victory in the immunity case related to the jack smith prosecution, which made it impossible for smith to bring a trial before the election. but they've also sided against trump when it comes to allowing his hush money trial sentencing to proceed. they even recently allowed a watch dog that he fired to remain in the job. so what we're looking at right now is when is going to be the first time that the supreme court really weighs in on the merits of this larger question of trump

times but we feel that it's not necessary to have this amendment attached to this bill because the supreme court has made a decision on integration issue and left it up to the federal courts, the lower courts, to carry out provisions. and we do not think it's necessary to mix these two issues. we think the integration issue can be decided through the court procedures, and we think the school bill, classroom construction be decided on its own merit and legislation to make it were running at about even though it would be to say that both features school aid construction bill and the position regard to segregation. both represent the president's viewpoint. yeah you see and of course the supreme said this this decision regarding integration carried out greatly, gradually over a period of time and it didn't indicate exactly when how except a split in the lower court would tear them out. and so we do not think the school construction should be delayed of that. another subject before us now is this social bill. you, your department have some opposition to. the form of the bill we passed in the house la

now don't end up in the courts in a big or in the supreme court in these first hundred days. but there are a number of court challenges as at the federal level that are going in the first hundred days. there are 99 court cases. and the roosevelt administration wins three quarters of them. so to the extent that they're in court, the roosevelt is not facing a lot of pushback in these early days. that is going to change. so supreme court picks up a couple of cases state direct intervention 1934. they say okay it's for the states to do employment program and different things. so that seemed like a hopeful sign. but you get to the start of 1935, the supreme court direct aim at these new deal programs and begins to these are unconstitutional. they they dust off something called the non delegation clause and constitution. they say congress can't give these powers to the executive branch. and so most of the big programs that come out of the first hundred days get shot down between 1935 and 1937. and every time one of them gets bounced by supreme court, then the roosevelt administratio

a supreme court justice kind of signals out there, hey, you know, you can change this through lawfareer case through the pipeline of the judiciary, with the hopes that one of them gets to this specific supreme court. and as we saw with roe versus wade being overturned. we see obergefell and hodges overturned. >> yeah. >> i mean, i think that, you know, what we saw during mccarthyism was a witch hunt based upon people's supposed political beliefs and associations. and i think what we're seeing here is a fundamental denial of people's rights based upon who they are, which i think actually raises the level of concern here. right. are we looking at something that has more in common with the worst of america's past, like jim crow, honestly, than mccarthyism? because what we are seeing in iowa, for example, is the removal of trans people from civil rights protections that the state granted. you know, just a little over a decade ago, for example, and the rolling back of rights through a supreme court ruling and through a series of state laws. for example, that people have gained. so i think

we'll tell you about the case the supreme court is set to hear today. >> steve: it's crazy.adies and gentlemen, "fox & friends" hour one for a monday, the first monday in march starts right now. >> steve: and let's start right here where we left things on friday. ukrainian president zelenskyy now says hey, i'm ready to sign the minerals deal with the united states, this despite his heated confrontation, i'm sure you saw it president trump and vice president vance in the oval office on friday afternoon. >> ainsley: madeleine rivera is live in washington with the latest for us, hey, maddie. >> madeleine: good morning. despite the spat with president trump in the oval office on friday volodymyr zelenskyy says he remains confident but he thinks his relationship with the united states and with president trump can be repaired. and like you said, steve, he is still confident and optimistic that they can reach a minerals deal with the united states. he still wants security guarantees though. the trump administration officials say security gawrnghts are contingent on a peace deal. an

now don't end up in the courts in a big or in the supreme court in these first hundred days. but there are a number of court challenges as at the federal level that are going in the first hundred days. there are 99 court cases. and the roosevelt administration wins three quarters of them. so to the extent that they're in court, the roosevelt is not facing a lot of pushback in these early days. that is going to change. so supreme court picks up a couple of cases state direct intervention 1934. they say okay it's for the states to do employment program and different things. so that seemed like a hopeful sign. but you get to the start of 1935, the supreme court direct aim at these new deal programs and begins to these are unconstitutional. they they dust off something called the non delegation clause and constitution. they say congress can't give these powers to the executive branch. and so most of the big programs that come out of the first hundred days get shot down between 1935 and 1937. and every time one of them gets bounced by supreme court, then the roosevelt administratio

and when do you think the supreme court will rule?>> dealing with this case. >> on a very fast track. interestingly, it is a case that began. >> on the first. >> day of trump's new term as president. on that very day, he did what he promised he was going to do before he said, i will be a dictator on day one. and the first thing he did as a dictator was basically to erase what congress had said should be spent in foreign aid, and much of which had already been committed with projects that had been finished around the world, a couple of billion dollars. and what he said was, i'm not bound by congress. it may have the power of the purse, but i have the power of the sword, and i'm going to cut right through all of the congressional commitment. that led to a flurry of cancellations around the world, people who are starving, people who are in great need, american contractors who are dealing. >> with their problems. >> and a federal judge in the district of columbia, judge amir ali, held several hearings and issued a very clear order stop in

the usaid case is ts.t' the first time the supreme court is weighing in on a trump 2.0 lawsuit. this? chief justice roberts, temporarily pausing a federal judge's ruling. to unfreeze. >> billions of dollars. >> owed to usaid contractors. >> and when. >> do you think the supreme court will rule? >> well, it's clearly dealing. >> with this case on a very fast track. interestingly. >> it is a. >> case that began on the first. >> day of trump's new term as president. on that very day, he did what he promised he was going to do before he said, i will be a dictator on day one. >> and the first. >> thing he did as. a dictator was basically to erase. what congress. >> had said. >> should be spent. >> in foreign. >> aid. >> and. >> much of which had already been. committed with projects. >> that had. >> been finished around the world, a couple of billion dollars. >> and what he said. >> was, i'm not bound by congress. >> it may. >> have. >> the power of the purse, but i have the power of the sword, and i'm going to cut right through all. >> of the congressional. >> commitments. that led

besick said, if need be, we'll take it all the way to the supreme court. of he thought the government was wrong, and he was right to take a stand. he was standing up as an american. and that is the question. what does it mean to be an american? my father was most proud of the fact that his federal conviction was overturned or vacated. it almost took 40 years for that to happen. he never gave up hope. after my father passed away in in 2005, then people were looking to me and at first i was a bit shy, i must admit, but i felt it was my responsibility to to carry on his legacy. well, when the lawsuit came up of trump versus hawaii, the muslim ban, then it became the immigration ban back in 1942. they called it, you know, military necessity. now we call it national security. this is the same pattern that the government has used from generation to generation. it's the same old story of you're guilty because you're looking like the enemy. and that's clearly wrong. my father was an example of working across communities, and that's what we need to do now more than

yes the supreme court is in the constitution.ourts are not they are a creation of congress. so it is a big difference that yes we defend the independence of all the courts. that'pray that'spart of the pro. isn't also part of the problem with certain republicans who just rubberstamp these nominees every time they come up. i think lindsey graham is 1 of the senators who has said the president has a right to his choice. no, no, no. we have a right, the people to somebody is going to be a judge and not an activist. biden and obama have put these radicals throughout the federal judiciary. >> we have to be clear either way the judiciary works et cetera break with the way it supposed to work. quite frankly it should not have the kind of power that it does over policy choices that are made, it should be made by the congress that pit should be made by the present and the executive branch. that is what people expect. when those judges get in the way of these policies i think we have to have a conversation about reform because so many activ

the supreme court said, yes, that is how it must be. no conditions as such exist. and the administration is flaunting the law by allowing this to continue. it is another part of that pattern of impunity, miles, that we were speaking, that you see in the adams case, fcpa, fara enforcement, and just the bad role modeling that suggests to the world, america is open for malign influence. of course, one big tiktok investor was reported to be cozy with trump, and he changed his position after a meeting with that individual, american individual. that is my answer. it is not strictly on point. jessica: i don't have a ton to add, just to say that congress had access to a wide array of evidence when it considered its decision, legislated. miles: i think the question is, as in so many other issues with foreign influence, what is the delta, the additional effect of foreign influence through that medium as opposed through x, where there is no longer any flagging of foreign government posts? twitter has a different audience. these all have different audiences. you could argue th

that went to the supreme court and the supreme court upheld the law as the proper law, not violate not -- not in violation of the constitution. since then there has been a seachange throughout the country and in new york that had its own three strike law where we are not doing that anymore. you will find that even if it is technically on the books that you are not going to have three strikes be imposed, if somebody committed three very violent felonies, of course that would be a factor but it is not mandatory anymore, and that -- not implied in new york state anymore that simply if someone has three felony convictions, regardless of the nature of conviction, that they had to be put in jail for life. so i had to sentence walter johnson 28 years ago to life because, at that time, the three strikes law was enforced in new york and i had no choice but to do that. today we do not do that anymore, there has been a change. so one of the important things about this whole concept of giving people a second chance is to realize that in the passage of time, things do not stay static. laws change.

i wanna be the next chief justice of the supreme court."eat war hero, shakes hands, says, "you got a deal." he wins. one year later, earl warren is the chief justice of the united states supreme court. rod wanted a political appointment from obama, and for that, he was prepared to trade obama's old senate seat, which is actually legal. otherwise, eisenhower would have gone to jail, and americans would not have "liked ike." do you see yourself as somebody who was just trying to function in perhaps an inherently corrupt but legal system, and that theoretically almost any politician could be snagged the way you were? absolutely. of course i do, except i'm giving me higher marks. because i was using that money that--that-- and that power gave me to fight an established system that served itself on the backs of the people, and when you do that, you piss a lot of people off, and they wanna get rid of you. but do you think that you're earthier about it? like, more outspoken about it? well, i wasn't hiding any of it, but these--because it's legal,

i think that was a huge win for the trump administration because if the supreme court is siding with n looking at some of these courts -- some of these cuts especially in the case of foreign aid a, that's huge for them to have chief justice roberts on their side and some other justices. whereas in the lower courts, as you mentioned, you know, it's not as powerful, and they can definitely, you know, look to the supreme court now if they need an ally on some of this government spending. and we see also the trump administration is working a little harder now to try to figure out how to do these knowing that there's going to be legal roadblocks and issues ahead. you know, we saw that there's going to be another e-mail out to federal workers this weekend saying what have you done this week, but it's going to come from agencies. that's a way to get around some of those legal issue is that arose when it came from opm, musk and the white house office. so they're definitely finding other ways too to try to figure out how to not have all these issues held up in court because we've seen there's

the fate of her lawsuit now rests with the supreme court. hear what the justices are weighing as they are making their decision. plus, shifting religious views. a major new study says that fewer americans view religion as a major part of their lives. hear what researchers are pointing to as the reason for that decline. >> there are going to be incredible surprises on the show this year, some. >> of hollywood's biggest night, the oscars, will happen with a few notable changes and some big performances. we'll tell you what to expect. that's coming up. ukraine's president zelenskyy is expected to receive a major show of support in london today. he's meeting with european leaders for a vital summit on ukraine's future. western allies are hoping the summit will revive the momentum towards a peace deal that was slowly building last week, before it came crashing down during this, that oval office melee. zelenskyy met with uk prime minister keir starmer yesterday at ten downing street, received a much warmer welcome than he got at the white house. >

. >> supreme court. >> will uphold that ruling? >> yeah. well, i mean, it's very obvious that donald trump does not adhere to the rule of law and that he thinks he can do whatever he wants, and he's got his people all over washington, all over tv saying that he's got this unitary executive power. and i think he believes that the supreme court is going to rule in his favor on whatever is put in front of him, because just like so many of the other folks who are serving in this administration, he is involved in a scheme that helped, you know, buy and sell some of our supreme court justices. but, you know, what elon musk is doing is reckless. it's illegal every single day. they are breaking the law. and they have fundamentally dismantled all of the oversight inside the federal government that would hold them accountable. they fired the igs, they fired federal workers who do oversight, and they've refused to appear before congress. and even though my republican colleagues, by and large, are not calling them out publicly, they are telling us behi

. >> businesses are hiring and we have them and didn't go to the supreme court to challenge it.e helped them and didn't go to the supreme court to challenge it. all of a sudden when it's about our students, they challenge it. the corporations challenge t the student loan lenders challenge it. that is not right. that is not fair. and that is what we are fighting as well when we say cancel student debt. lisa: my ears are hurting ach that. okay, time to put our kids' education first and stop hiring woke teachers. >> make it make sense. safety is essential. keep our students and our teachers safe. lisa: what did we just watch? joey, we look at our nation's report card from 2024 with passing scores and look at grade 4 reading 31% proficient and math 31%, grade 8 reading 30%, math 28%. how do we get here as a country when republic education is not educate something joey: people don't love this answer. couple of things and we talk a lot about teachers and woke teachers and videos of the teachers trying to indoctrinate our kids. i think public schoolteachers are absolute amazing people

the listening post, the coding, the media analysis era, the supreme court as long hilda political boycotts or form of expression protected by the 1st amendment, the sponsor, the anti boycott bill because, you know, i think it's just the right thing to do. the jewish people are gods chosen people and i, i feel like an obligation to do anything within my control or power to support them or protect preston for the house. this passage of senate bill 513 or the machine mr . clair, i would say probably have would identifies evangelical. they understand how important it is to support israel. $69.00 days, 3 days, 0 present, the bill is passed. i have the right to boycott. anyone i want to and the state has no business getting involved in that period. so their business, and i'm gonna send email to my son's coordinator. i'm telling her, listen, i cannot sign this, this is against my principles against my constitutional rights. and, and it's also against my moral and ethical values, considering that i am a palestinian america. i was just opening my annual contract from the state of arizona. and i was

solicitor general, which is the person who represents the united states government before the supreme courtrefusal by him and other trump justice department nominees yesterday to say that the president must always obey the federal courts. that prompted a stern and somewhat unexpected admonition from one republican senator from john kennedy of louisiana. >> you're all adults. >> you're all. >> officers of the court. >> some will give you. >> some advice. >> i may. >> be. >> wrong. >> but i doubt it. don't ever. >> ever take the. >> position that you're not. going to follow. the order of. a federal. >> court, ever. >> now, you can. disagree with it. within the. bounds of legal ethics. >> you can. >> criticize it. >> you can. appeal it. or you can resign. >> joining us now is illinois senator dick durbin. he is the second highest ranking democrat in the senate. he's the ranking member on the senate judiciary committee. senator durbin, it's a rare pleasure to be able to have you here on the show tonight. thank you so much for making time. >> thanks, rachel. good to be with you. >> i know that y

an act that was deemed constitutional by the supreme court of the united states. so what previous presidents did before the impoundment control act is one thing but if you're going to follow the law you are going to follow the impoundment control act and is highly disappointing to hear you, mr. vought, as if the law was never passed. i just want you to understand that the freeze had real impacts, they are not hypotheticals, and their impacts on money that not only was appropriated by this body, article one, the congress of the united states, but signed into law by a president of the united states. mr. edgar, i'm going to follow up on fema. fema is responsible for coordinating the federal response to disasters and it recently fired hundreds of employees. reporting suggested fired employees included not just new employees, but also some longtime employees who had recently been promoted, including some with more than a decade of experience. i'm concerned that these indiscriminate firings done in a really sloppy manner will harm the ability of fema to do its job. mr.

william howard taft went on the supreme court after the presidency of the scotus would have been a logicalupgrade for coolidge from simple retirement. he had the interest he, had the skill, yet no nominee. and came. and as you know, progressives did take and the white house coolidge passed away just as roosevelt crafting plans for the tennessee authority he was there in the thirties to comment on policy in the depression. in that period, progressives did downgrade coolidge, including blaming him for the depression. if you ask me, did coolidge caused depression? you can say the answer in one word. no, that's so. he remains downgraded in books to this day. there were a few at the time who understood this evaluation of coolidge might be wrong. one was the wall street journal, which commented in its 33 obituary of calvin coolidge that in due the good fortune of the united states to have had such a man as coolidge in just the years he filled that office, the presidency will be more clearly recognized than it has been. but setting aside the man even more important is the legacy, the relevance, f

the supreme court gave me that one.the cold open skit was filled with snl stars, including james austin johnson as president trump, bowen yang as vice president vance, and mikey day as zelensky. it also featured a surprise appearance by mike myers as elon musk. that was fun to see. all right. this could also be fun to say just down the evy. sacramento is in the spotlight thanks to a new comedy. the trailer for the film, appropriately named named sacramento. it came out this week. i don't have the authority to kick you out of group, but you need to stop coming to group. where do i go? there it is. the movie stars michahael garano, michael cera, kristen stewart, and a few favorite local businesses. they appear, including that one right there, gunther's ice cream. it's a sacramento staple located in curtis park. it shows up in the film and so does dive bar. that's right on k street, where mermaids help with the ambiance. the film dive bar is so iconic to sacramento that we were in the trailer. we're so visually stunning. l

growing demonstrations at national parks and the legal fight that could land in front of the supreme court>>> protests flaring up after a black man was shot and killed in florida. some are now calling for justice. >>> a deadly pileup shutting down an arizona highway after warnings of a windy dust storm. >>> the new security measures in place for mardi gras after that new year's day terror attack on bourbon street. >>> our exclusive one-on-one with chipolte's ceo and his plan to try to keep prices stable. >> if it starts to cost you more for avocados, you are not going to pass that cost on to the customer? >>> and good news tonight. hollywood star debbie allen and these dancers helping a community rise from the ashes. >> announcer: this is "nbc nightly news" with hallie jackson. >>> we are coming on the air tonight with the state of emergency in the south. firefighters in the carolinas now racing to get a handle on the wildfires burning thousands of acres with some people forced out of their homes. and you can see why. look at this wall of flames surrounding a neighborhood just north of myr

the supreme court is going to have to step up, and this will help define the politics and the law ofs. >> yeah, and it'll certainly be a defining moment in our nation's history as to how the supreme court comes down on so many of these issues. but it's safe to say we're still in the shock and awe period of everything that is happening with the past couple of months. >> i think people a few months ago were kind of checked out. >> yeah. >> a month ago they were kind of stunned and depressed. i think people are getting angry. >> and starting to reengage. mike waldman, thank you so much. great to have you on the show. really appreciate it. after the break, cashing in on cruelty. why trump's plans for mass. deportations sound really good to people like the former blackwater ceo erik prince. next hour, i'll be talking to professor jeffrey sachs about what's next for russia's war in ukraine. after his rather explosive address to the eu explosive address to the eu parliament. if you take or have taken humira for moderate to severe crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and still have symptoms

washington, which is out of power, not just executive power, but power in the congress power and the supreme court power and the judiciary. so they are at a loss for a strategy that power mafia is represented by the democratic party and a faction of the republicans that is waning with in the american electorate. that kind of never trump, or is represented by george w bush and liz cheney. so they're, they're, they're just flailing right now and the power mafia in washington that's out of power. if we listen to the words of michael mcfall, who was one of their key voices on russia, he is warned that if the united states in europe do not continue to sustain this war against russia through ukraine, then taiwan might actually decide to negotiate with china instead of continuing to arm up and that this could do grave damage to us empire in the long run. so that's why they want to keep using slavic meat to throw in to the slaughter house in order to extend russia because they're afraid about the loss of their imperium. in the long run. all i see and then bins the blame of what happened in the white house

then the supreme court hears the case of an ohio woman who alleges reverse discrimination against straight people. later, the comptroller general testifies before the house over federal programs considered high risk for mismanagement, fraud and waste. monday, local and federal leaders meet for the national association of counties legislative conference to discuss taxes and budget reconciliation along with disaster preparedness and the impact of the trump administration's policies at the local level. watch on c-span 2, c-span now or online at c-span.org. >> next week, on the c-span networks, the house and senate are in session. the house will vote on legislation to repeal ben administration energy and environment rules. the senate continues voting on president trump's cabinet nominations, including secretaries of education and labor. both are facing a march 14 government funding deadline. the house could begin voting on extending until september to prevent a shutdown. tuesday, the senate considers the nomination of matthew whitaker, former acting attorney general during president trump's ad

mexico making their case to supreme court today, surprising reason they are suing american companies. brothers are kicking off their anniversary tour and will join us live. if you thought things were going to slow down, you were wrong. we have a busy morning at the top of the hour. see you in a bit. tand. that's why at fisher investments we start by getting to know each other. so i can learn about your family, lifestyle, goals and needs, allowing us to tailor your portfolio. (wife) what about commission- based products? (fisher investments) we don't sell those. we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in your best interest. (husband) so how do your management fees work? (fisher investments) we have a transparent fee, structured so we do better when you do better. at fisher investments, we're clearly different. i was scared when i was told age related macular degeneration could jeopardize my vision. it was hard, but taking preservision was easy. preservision has the exact clinically proven areds 2 formula recommended by the nei. i'm taking control like millions of others. (♪) i'm a little n

the supreme court said no. but on the birthright citizenship provision. highly controversial.what you think's going to happen on the legal end when this goes into effect after the president takes office. okay. thank you. a lot there. i think you would agree. i'm a lawyer. yeah, you're good at it. i can tell. all right. so let's start with entitlements. you have to we have to recognize that birthright citizenship is a major power entitlement, a constitu one that is going to take a whole separate a different avenue to work out and to deal with as far as that bucket of entitlements. though, in general the of those can be discontinued it's through executive order and doesn't necessarily require congressional legislation. right. so president trump coming office can turn that tap off on day one and you're going to see that happen, by the way. you're going to see a whole lot of plans being used to sign a whole lot of paper that ends exactly that it's going to end. for example, the use of that cbp one app, which is essentially a concierge service that was created by the biden administ

the supreme court has held that.ically -- basically said that states and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal policy, that that interferes with the principles of anti-common deering that are -- commandeering that are part of the tenth amendment. so it is legal, and we cosee that crime is lower if her city and similar cities that are also sanctuary cities. jon: that seems like a pretty broad statement. you look at a place like los angeles or chicago, those are sanctuary cities, and crime is rampant there. >> it's not about whether crime is rampant if, it's a comparison to non-sanctuary cities to sanctuary cities of the aim size. that's what i'm saying. i think you're mixing upal apples and oranges here. what i'm saying is that boston, which is a sanctuary city, has a lower crime rate than similarly-sized cities that are not sanctuary cities. jon: okay. but what is the value of not having your police departments and other, or you know, local law enforcement not having them cooperate with federal immigrat