i'll be happy to answer any questions thank you. >> commissioner antonini. >> mr. fry thank you for your report in view of the point they're considering alameda emergency are they looking at park emergency i think the building is still there a series of emergency hospitals throughout san francisco for urgent care cases, in fact park emergency it featured in dirty harry the movie i'm wondering if it is a global consideration will of all. >> that theme was brought up and desire to document the his and the local hospitals we do have one designated adjacent to golden gate park but this will set within 9 and same context we hope that will be included in the final report. >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we move on to general public comment of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission up to three m

i'd like to take roll at this time commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioners first on your calendar is items for continuance item one at mississippi conditional use authorization is for may 14, 2015 any public comment? item two on van ness avenue proposed until may 21st 2015 at turk street and case no. at lech worth downtown project authorization have proposed until june 4th, 2015 further commissioners item 7 for case no. at pine strait conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance may 28 i have no future items proposed for continuance and unless - there are no speaker cards >> okay. any public comment on the items proposed for continuance? not seeing mississippi any that being said >> commissioner richards move to continue all the items proposed as outlined. >> number 7? >> 7 1, 2, 3 ab and 7. >> commissioners on that months ago motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu

italian-american commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson and commissioner moore. >> commissioners, the first item on your agenda item one ab for cases at pacific avenue discretionary review and variance proposed until june next case pacific discretionary review and variance are proposed until june 4th no another items i have several speaker cards for the first two items. >> calling names of speaker cards sorry (calling names). >> hello, i'm eric i'm the son the project sponsor we're here to support the staff recommendation for continuance the hamburger until june 4th we requested may 21st, however foufd the dprer was not available we agreed to the fourth date there is currently angle dbi enforcement action that is, we may have to abate within the next thirty days on we don't know at this point. >> thank you good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the planning commission i'm kathleen the chair for the russian hill association this proposed project as ramifications beyond pacific after the results of thi

commissioner president fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards we expect commissioner wu to be late and commissioner johnson for absent commissioners, the first item on your agenda proposed for continuance item one is at california street is proposed to june you figure out 2015 and next rezoning properties and zoning map are june 18, 2015 case 3 at pine street conditional use authorization is proposed for definitely continuance i have not 0 other items proposed for continuance i'll check on those any public comment on this item? for the items proposed for continuance not seeing any public comment is closed. >> and any commissioners feel like making a motion commissioner moore. >> (inaudible). >> thank you commissioner on that motion to continue matters as proposed commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you on commissioner matters draft minutes for the rules committee and the may 14 regul

. >> commissioner antonini 0. >> i'll vote against this but one that is approved as proposed i mean this is the kind of thing that adds additional costs to a project and in many instances give us a bad reputation acquiring extraordinary means without a good reason it is technically in the code i understand that but if we could stash finding and the finding it is all underground you know they're doing all the things we asked him to do and at the time 11th hour to go further by adding more costs we w0r7 why things cost so many i'm against the motion. >> commissioner moore. >> i looked at the slightly different than this particular project all the work of typography i'll be interested to hear our exist proposed height and how much space we're working on the typography and scraping more feet is not an issue. >> the height of the building overall. >> not garage height floor to ceiling. >> it is actually on the drawing so the lower garage floor to floor is 8 feet 4 inches or 3 inches and the you were grammar is 9 photo floor to floor. >> and the upper garage meets the minimum requirement for a

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah.amiliar with that area that's a hub area because ocean off flows into mission at that particular point i think this seems to be where a lot of the financial activities and other activities of the neighborhood seemed to be centered the bigger factor what's the closest umpqua bank to this location in san francisco. >> mark with reuben, junius & rose that's the potrero hill not opened and next on second street actually a store in hayes valley noah valley. >> that's my point they're all quite a ways away and this is really inconvenient when having you have a banknote resemble close to where you're doing business or living you have to go to their things and some things can be done offsite regarding issues that are more long lasting in scope some should be done in person that's a benefit for people in the neighborhood to have a bank particular one that smaller and indicators to the community it doesn't matter whether it is close to another three or four banks but acquit a ways away from othe

. >> commissioner antonini. >> well, the purposes of the turns i'm not sure i'm support it work with the spefr opener and see if there's a way to merge it would be go explore that and also to see if perimeters could, developed to make a smoother landing for the present tenant pcp that being said or it is a lot of the cars go the dlairpz it is a nice thing to go to the neighborhood you walk there and pick up the car after it's serviced i know mr. hesitating on has his one its chevron that's my only interest in a continuance. >> commissioner richards. >> when my car caught fire it was toad to the service bay when it stopped working on scott street and cal i was a block away and it was toetd to the same place maybe you could take into account it and i think that would really be necessary desirable and this is hugely compatible where everyone can benefit from this i support a continuance i know you'll make a good faith to try. >> commissioner moore. >> both president fong and commissioner antonini hit the nail on the head by saying it's a question of trying it is always easy to say i can

. >> okay commissioner antonini. >> yeah. mr. mulling sincere a question on the same thing that was raised by commissioner richards i think there is a contract to be if for a fact it is ecology doing the site of disposal in the future i think that there was some question about whether there's an incentive to keep it although i assume that's part of whole contract being proposed. >> i'm not sure i understand your question. >> the question raised by commissioner richards was how are we're going to assure that the ecology is going to since hair the recipients as well as the transporter to strive to keep it low that's they're the best in the country and gotten the award many times i'm assuming part of the contract has nothing to do with it but specifically to clarify there i hear the rates are lower. >> maybe jack from the department can answer they're charged with the zero rate reduction and work closely with the ecology and jack mentioned policies and efforts 200 underway to reduce the waste stream he may be able to produce more sp

okay seen we'll call the motion to approval on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore no commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 6 to one with commissioner moore vociferating against and place you on item 8 grant avenue this is also a cb 3 conditional use authorization good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the commissions and staff the item before you a request for conditional use authorization to competitor vacant limited restaurant space and it is on the empowering of a commercial space on the north beach neighborhood commercial district in the planning code section requires limited restaurants to obtain a c u n and the project manager for grant avenue held the preapplication meeting on the subject property per the application sign-in sheet only one person attended the project sponsor sent the cu a notice to the group on april 10, 2010 the project will have improvements to the ground floor commercial space the former tenant francisco v

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. a couple of things it seems to me i ago with commissioner hillis and would be supportive of moving forward today, if you have 25 feet at the bottom the guys at the top have the same separation my own why the issue they'll be good close to the neighbors 25 feet is gracious but oftentimes when our right across the street across the street from another structure in san francisco you might be from their window to your window especially with set back of the houses to the street it seemed adequate to me other thing if we went with the 25 foot courtyard all the way up then we would still think given enough to satisfy cost of hawkins concerns not going and rise that type of thing so i'm probably against a continuance and in favor of moving forward with with partnerships agreed to and i think gives everybody a nice separation from they're neighbor. >> if i ask make a comment i think a lot of commissioner johnson i think a lot of are feeling two different things in san francisco a need to incre

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i'm going to move to approve that project i think that is very good done. >> i'll second it i was out there on a wet day happy to see you'll worked out did smoirdz with the neighbors so congratulations or precongratulations. >> if it is amenable to the maker of the motion to approve with conditions as automated with the finding read into the record by staff. >> yes. thank you. >> it is amenable to me. >> thank you on that motion commissioners to approve that matter with conditions as amended with the finding roared by staff par commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you under our discretionary review calendar for item 12 at ocean avenue a mandatory discretionary review. >> good afternoon, commissioners marseille with the planning department staff we have a request for a mandatory discretionary review t

. >> is there any additional public comment okay that being said and commissioner antonini. >> thank you very much what we've heard the commission district is a very diverse place and becoming more diverse a good thing the ancestors of the gentleman were in the mission before a lot of us today so they have deep roots but it is important to release that no one group speaks for the mission district we have to help as many people as possible one the speakers misinterpreted the comments of another speaker she's saying the demand is there, there are many people that want to live in the mission district they're going to compete for the existing housing stock or somewhat moderated by new housing being met that's our choose nothing or building new housing many of the people had been here and will want to buy or rent places in the mission district will have the choice of buying something every expert inch taujd to if you don't build new you're putting more pressure and causing displacement that's the way things work and splild is anyway you can believe or not building in it is a fact of life

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. a few things i'm supportive of the project i'll agree with the other commissioners with do nuance things as brought up by commissioner moore i know we've gotten a copy of the hawkins agreement a question for the city attorney if it is possible as we know cost of hawkins prevents setting of rent that were created after 1995 until a direct financial or consideration given to the project i haven't read in great detail i was occurring what satisfies that requirement on the project that the - in the cost of hawkins agreement if you don't know now there has to be a consideration that allows us to let that happen. >> i did not work on this easement i'll read through that the planner may know what the tradeoffs are often it is a relief from set back requirements for area ratios those kinds of things i don't know what is at issue. >> ♪ instance since the commission is considering modifications so for example the tradeoffs to the rear yard as well as to the exposure those would be for example,

the design comments from the commissions with a minimum 13 foot front set back you commissioner antonini. >> sutter street. >> front set back on sutter center of very good. >> on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner richards commissioner johnson commissioner moore arrest commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously zoning administrator, what say you? on the variance, close the public hearing and be granted to the variance will hold the decision until the final revised plan it is a through lot and they're keeping the existing facade. >> very good commissioners, the first item on your agenda under your discretionary review calendar on montana street a request for discretionary review. >> all right. good afternoon commissioner johns and members the commission before you a question for a proposal to modify one story dwell on montana street the proposed modifications removing a 7 foot wide locked south of the encroachment to the adjacent dwelling on monday night street to the east with and constructing a stai

. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you the jewish home is a wonderful facility i've had a lot of patient and two family members i'm familiar it is very comfortable and very great facility to have to spend time those improvements will make it much better so i'm total in support i'll mention architecturally with the new buildings we'll try to i know your teacher of the year down the historic building but make the present one reflected the masonry masonry qualities i'll fit in with the existing buildings other than everything looks at great. >> commissioner hillis. i look forward to hearing this and glad to see an instill use we've seen them struggle to find space in the space you're in kind of to adopt to the urban environment like the architect and look forward to hearing this i'll move to initiate >> second. >> commissioners if there's nothing further there's a there is a motion and a second to initiate the planning code and zoning map amendments as revised commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner

. >> on that motion to take dr and require a 7 and a half foot set back commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore this is that and a half feet going around the pop out. >> it's a straight line along the main property line. >> okay. >> yes. >> commissioner richards and commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero commissioner that place us on item 11 at third street a mandatory discretionary review. >> of this members of the commission i'm jeff the planning staff staff the item is a mandatory discretionary review of a building permit application for the building on third street building is on the nc 1940 zoning district proposal so establish a new medical dispensary doing business as dog patch collective previously occupied by the design firm the vacant space is a 3 thousand square feet no parking is required and no expansion is proposed for this the proposed mcd and has drinks and food and will not permit antidepressant smoke the packet has an error in the legal was not removed on the floor plans they don't include a varp area so to d

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes national anthem to 6 and commissioner that place you on our final agendized item at possible street a conditional use authorization. >> good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the commission carlly grove planning staff the item is a request for establish a restaurant within the possible district to expose 25 hundred square feet and to conduct an outdoor area with the square feet grocery stores at the ground floor the proposed routine right away restaurant has a pizza and cafe and rooftop restaurant and would only be assessable to the market the proposed restaurant includes a basement level kitchen to support those restaurants on the upper floors that is not available otherwise the total area of the restaurant use is 68 hundred square feet as a bona fide beer and sale for wine they've proposed a square feet roof deck for the patrons for spargs between the restaurant no alcohol served or permitted in the

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i have a few questions too i forced that the contract that you have good not allow for residential use or hospitals or schools apparently shell didn't name office use so you could have office use. >> correct. >> i'm not saying it's a good decision. >> we're not office buildings e builders. >> this didn't matter the counteracting with shell dictated to keep it a shelf station. >> no, it has to be a shell gas stations. >> i was going to ask i guess that it is not an option to keep the exist mechanical use the service part of the service station because there's not enough rent but a commercial rent control not raise the rent on our tenant but keep uncle there you when we took over the site in 2010, the rent charged in 2005 we left stand knowing we are going to have to do this work they can't survive to artificially raise the rent the tenant won't survive yeah. i could but if i did that he'll go throughful to allow for the time is the best solution since 2010 hey we're on a month to month

first out of the ignite after the housing pause from supervisor campos i hear with commissioner antonini is saying about the eastern neighborhood everyone is sick ever hear me involved in the market octavia to hold and play by the rules and billed build to the new rules the gentleman hit the nail on the head i'm frustrated what you say it is on my masonic the commission go there are creative idea for solutions to keep displacement down or maximize the level of displacement had we taken those 23 percent and put it into a building of 12 hundred and 50 k we probably could save the displacement of 10 families we're stick with this it's a shame we need to change that as quickly as possible and i hope to spend a lot of energy on that one question from the director we've noted heard open the mission 20/20 does this have anything to do with the zoning plan you want or want to cover my basis. >> we're locking to achieve his or her production as well as eviction control one of the speakers i cannot went this site is small with respect to the size of the malice it is and that's true this is this si

> commissioners there is a motion and a second to continue to july 2nd to ask the - commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and we've received a request from sfgovtv to break in order to allow them to switch their production rooms and allow us to be broadcast live. >> that's 5 minutes. >> good afternoon and welcome back to the san francisco planning commission regular hearing for thursday, may 21, any kind. please silence any devices that may sound off during the proceedings. folks and people that be standing in the back of the room found a seat we've arrange for american people overflow room please translate that for me, please. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> that are not occupied, of course. >> this is for fire safety reasons please. okay. so commissioners we left off on item 13 ab excuse me. 12 ab for the cases yes, ma'am and on silver avenue this is a considerations of that resolution of - excuse me. w

further commissioners there is a motion and a second to approve with conditions. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 11 san francisco overlook other crestmont drive a conditional use authorization. >> good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the commission michael smith planning department staff it seeks conditional use authorization to amend the motion to modify a previously authorized plan development only two vacant lots 62 thousands plus square feet for the construction of 29 dwelling units in 62 thousands square feet with 58 off-street parking and new paved private street previous planning commission action in march of 2013 approved the p u d for a larger project that included 34 dwelling units in 65 thousand square feet of remain and off-street parking a total of 13 buildings will be constructed the same as previously approved unit mix in the new project is 5 single

not seeing any that being said. >> commissioner antonini. >> a clarification for albert this is only involving the trees being planted in connection are the development rather than trefz existing in front of someone's house the requirement is triggered as part of the new development yes. >> okay. just changing jurisdiction it sound like to me. >> it is it you definitely. >> some issues of the old trees we have to get rid of them their rounding rue ruining sidewalks. >> those issues were dealt with with dpw. >> okay. this sounds like reasonable to me. >> commissioner richards commissioner richards. >> just quick question significant trees nothing it changing in terms of the program is significant trees are still significant trees and get cared for in the same level of curb in the discussion making pursued that's correct. >> that maintains i move to approve. >> second. >> approve with modifications. >> with modifications and with modifications yeah. >> very good so i did hear the maker and the seconder acknowledge that thank you very much did we take public comment. >> we did there was

and opening up to commissioners commissioner antonini. >> well, first of all, i need an explanationshat on the parking issue from staff i'm trying read those over i'm not clear from what you can tell 2 or more bedroom unit has a right to one to one parking and studios one parking should be i guess .5 if i'm reading it cell loud to the have more they have valet or lifts or a variety of mitigations. >> so i would say the general parking ratio for those units not meeting the two bedroom is .75. >> oh right. >> those unite to exceed one thousand square feet are 23 units are entitled to the 5 rate ratio this triggers the provisions in the code section and embedded within that code section is the section i highlight under subsection b i which requires they adopt spaces it reduces spaces for parking and maximize other uses so the pardon has provided valet as part the thought parking situations and we've identified the subterranean or maximizing of other uses there's an opportunity within the sub garage. >> let me go begin at the beginning unit over one thousand scapegoat and two or three be

. >> commissioner antonini. >> i voted for rincon hill plan including all the towers that are being built we wanted to put towers on hills that makes more sense than the valencia and the gentrification is working anti well as a result point up in the staff report the 399 got an tower exception two as well as 375 i remember the discussion an 399 but arc today's they are putting two buildings and the compromise to have one tower that is aesthetically better i think this is it brought it closer to rincon hill they needed to tower exceptions correct me if i am wrong if anyone knows i'm quite sure about 375 but maybe a similar situation. >> so the separation is between this building and the 45 lansing is somewhat similar to the situation between number one and 399 fremont if i'm not mistaken i a point of information, sir can answer this question what's the definition of a tore is it over 85 feet considered a tower? >> in the rincon hill it is over hundred and 10. >> hundred and 10 oh, but this qualifies as a a tower our hundred and 7 three or four hundred presumably the tower that's the higher

italian-american commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson and commissioner moore. >> commissioners, the first item on your agenda item one ab

. >> there is a motion and a second to disapprove that project on that 0 motion commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on public comment no speaker card audience new general public comment seeing none meeting @p >> we love our parks, but we love... >> and the community who is really the core of it all, came together and said what we need is a place for our teenager to play, not just play grounds for the kids and soccer fields but we need a skate park that will keep the kids home in the neighborhood so they can play where they live. >> the children in the neighborhood and it will be a major boone. and we have generations, the youth generations that will be able to use this park in different places. >> the best park in san francisco right here. >> creating place where people can be active and lead active, healthy life styles that are going to just stay with them for life. ♪ the meeting to order attends to interfere with the

. >> there is a motion and a second to disapprove that project on that 0 motion commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on public comment no speaker card audience new general public comment seeing none meeting . >> and commission would the concert please call the roll (inaudible) commissioner harrison and commissioner loo. >> and establishing your mike is not on. >> can you hear me now. >> now we can hear you laughter you want to make our announcements yeah let me make a couple of announcements before we start the commission will recess this meeting from 1045 to 11 thirty with a joint meeting with the planning commission that will start at 11 and let's see also st. mary's is removed because of ongoing conversations that are occurring with that. >> so again, this the the recreation and parks department on thursday, may 21, 2015, we'll ask you, please turn off electronic advises we ask you take secondary conversation outside

commissioner antonini. >> well, thank you all for testifying i think this is a record inform a numberf people testifying at least with when i've been sitting up here i've been sitting here for a long time the project sponsor is sincere but the location is the wrong place and it's clear testimony we've heard tonight the neighborhood is not comfortable with the use and they don't want it and it has been turned down once by the court so i don't think that is a good project i i mean it would be different if you're or else somewhere in the middle of san mateo county and have to travel to san francisco a case 0 could be made an access problem but when you have another dispensaries particularly on ocean avenue a mile and a half away anyone in sunset can get there so you know i think that is one of the reasons and the other things that have been brought up worth mention is the we probably attack on mission street and this will attract people if san mateo county and on sight consumption didn't mean you can't sit there your car and having more problems not with any dispensary we have a lot of t

i'd like to take roll at this time commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antoninis items for continuance item one at mississippi

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i think i'm supportive of f that are we 7 and a half feet from the pop out or from the the pop out is legally part of the 57 that monday night we accomplish the same thing utilizes width of the pop out. >> it is roughly 5 feet 9 inches wide the correction about the spacing between the eastern wall and the pop out and monday night it is actually 55 inches not 7 inches i have a photo if i could. >> there's a second. >> so this is actually. >> okay. thank you. >> may i further clarify there's been a lot of talk about the access this is the adjacent property so i know it is difficult to maintain a property in the zero lot line in the city it is more expensive someday you have to do the work inside out this didn't confer access on the the permit holders property they'll center to get proper authorization from the permit holder. >> my concern is with those numbers it looks like we're setting it back 90 and the pop out is 689 if i'm read it correctly so you've got a little bit of room might

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards no commissioner wu commissioner president fong no. >> that motion passes 4 to to with commissioners commissioner richards and commissioner president fong voting against commissioners that places us under our discretionary review calendar for item 10 for case this is a staff initiated discretionary review. >> golden gate bridge commissioners michael smith planning department staff that is the discretionary review for the project at 372 sucking sick street the construction of a two story edition at the rear of a split-level single-family unit the department initiated the dr it was previously reviewed by the commission pursuant to the discretionary review action memo what dr was requested by the adjacent neighbors to the west with the dr action memo the commission voted plus 6 to one to take discretionary review and approve the permit inform one have the circle last year stalkers or staircases and remove the east deck adjacent to the master bedroom and 3 provide access to the new roof deck and to the st