the applicant? the police? >> the applicant is here? >> i guess the applicant would be appropriate at this time. welcome. >> i just wanted to tell you that it is a restaurant with beer and alcohol. mariachi. now, it is only fridays and saturdays. a lot of people ask for the mariachi. thanks a lot. >> are you familiar with the request by the police department to condition your license? are you ok with those? you are. ok. any other questions? mr. valle. >> mariachi, i have had it at my club a few times. last night on friday night. they like to go outside and do the line. the permit is for the inside. >> they will be inside. >> all right. thank you. >> thanks a lot. >> hear from the esteemed permit officer. >> good evening, commissioners. i'm the permit officer for mission statement -- station. with regard to cava 22, i wanted to reiterate that our primary coern is that this venue continue to be operated as a bonafide food establishment. that is what its licenses for. that is what it is. we have a history that is consistent as far as polic

this time, we submitted application to continue. vice chair joseph: do you have a permit to operate afterhours? >> no, we do not. >> on september 11, 2011, you were cited for operating after- hours. >> yes. on that night, we were not doing business. all of the clients were gone. we sat down but we did not lock the door. we were talking over the night and how the business was going on. vice chair joseph: were you drinking alcohol during the meeting? >> yes. vice chair joseph: did you know that was illegal? and you do not operate afterhours, your telling me? >> we know the guidelines right now. we do not. we never do after-hours for business. vice chair joseph: do you feel that one security guard is enough to handle your establishment? >> 1 security at the front door and three other owners who are monitoring. if you guys require, we will have additional -- we hire professional security. >> can you tell me a little more about your neighborhood outreach? >> it is a restaurant and bar, which is similar to us with karaoke, a late-night re

and based upon a document provided by the applicant. having guards and steam cleaning to try to protect the location of certain documentation provided to us. they want a level of public safety in this portion of the right-of-way. from a disability access viewpoint, had this issue been brought to the department immediately after the issuance of the permit or during, the department would have taken action to remedy that situation and find a resolution to insure -- at this point we are not sure that she wants the gate open 24- 7 or removed. is it truly a disability access issue or is it something else? she stated that she has been provided with rejection of their request to open the gate. this was a few days after the department took the extraordinary action -- are requiring the gate be open from 8-5. even though they depended -- the permit has been suspended. we do not believe we have the authority to further increase that requirement. i am here to answer any questions you may have. >> [inaudible] is there a corresponding building permit

is complete and develop applications etc. so they are all being worked through that process right now. and then the community and the organizational develop some approach to order the processing of those or to process them as a whole group. then there's an objection period that's important that's open right now and a comment period so anyone listening to this program, if you hear about a new to be made in name that you like or don't like you can go online to icann.org and show your support in objecting and there's a formal objection process where parties with standing have an ability to file a specific objection so flexible if you own a trademark and feel someone has filed for a new domain that has your trademark and they have no trademark rights then you can file a specific objection and there will go to a review panel and i would certainly predict if you own the trademark and the party doesn't and you are in a good position to block the application. so, the applications that process and get through the objections if they ge

you know, received 1900, over 1900 applications. >> host: so $185,000 per application, correct? >> guest: that's right. that's exactly right. >> host: what is that money used for, and who gets to hold on to it? >> guest: icann's a nonprofit organization, and this program was costed out on break-even basis. so the $185,000 is an estimate of what it will cost to process those applications. there's legal checks, criminal background checks on officers, financial checks, technical checks, there's review panels, there's objections that can be filed that have to be reviewed by arbitration panels, so it's a very complex program. those are the estimated costs. if the costs come in lower than that, then the icann community will decide what should be done with those funds. they do not go to icann for covering operations unless the commitment decided to do that. so that's the estimated costing for the program. >> host: rod, you mentioned you looked to internationalize icann. there have been growing calls for greater international involvement in the internet. what is your response to some of

as i said, every application. increasingly, what has happened is highly specialized applications. i will give you one example of that. dealer track. they actually do loan origination software for automotive loans. today, basically 80% of all the loans in the united states are processed through their software. we will see much more of this. we want to talk about not as public companies, tons of this. all of these guys uses the original cloud service. a lot of people have asked me why we call it a cloud. what does this come from? it is pretty simple. in the old days of client-server computing -- some of us were around them -- we would draw a picture of a pc, a picture of a unix server, and then a picture of a little clout in between. mostly because none of us understood how networks work. for the old folks in the room, you may remember certain words. this is all communication technology developed for corporations to build their own networks. that sounds like crazy talk today, right? nobody does that anymore. everybody is using ip, mpls- based networks. that is the network cloud. the

hu, if you lie on your application, that is an automatic denial. you must never law on the application about who owns the place or anything else. it is not nice to lie to the police. i do not need you to come up here, i am just telling you. this is not open for discussion. president newlin: once you get your permit, you cannot be acting like you are not the owner. i am all about having a club and being responsible. you might as well stand there and say, i am the owner and take responsibility. if you cannot do that at this point, why are you in business? you are endangering other people. we take public safety very seriously at this commission. i am a club owner and i deal with way more people than you do. you just have to understand, even though you bought this business, you have the responsibility to your neighbors and merchants who did support you who may be later on will not support you. i am letting you know you should work this thing out. did everybody meet the new permit officer? >> the new john gallagher. president newlin: there can only be o

host: rod beckstrom, who's the approval process on these 1900 applications? guest: they go through an initial evaluation phase, each of the applications, to see if all the information is complete and they're valid application, et cetera, so they're being worked through that process right now and then the community and the organization will be developing some approach to order the processing of those or to process them as a whole group, and then there's an objection period that's very important, that's open right now, and a comment period. so anyone listening to this program, if you hear about a new gtl name that you either like or don't like, you did go online to i can.org and you can file your comment right now on how you feel, either in support or objecting to any term. and there's also a formal objection process, where parties with standing have an ability to actually file a specific objection. so for example, if you own a trademark and you feel that someone has filed for a new domain that has your trademark in it and they have no trademark rights you can

the department received an application from the applicant. there were several applications. the challenge the applicant faced is there are multiple properties that exit onto this. an agreement must be made with each individual property owner to authorize the vacation of this portion of the right of way. planning department had specific issues. there were other challenges and obstacles in the process of a vacation. moving forward, what happens was the application determined there were other alleyways along the tenderloin that consistently received quality of life issues were the department, in conjunction with the police department, has deemed it to be an emergency to fend off those in this case, the department received support from san francisco police department as well as our department as it relates to the installation of this gate. the mechanisms that were installed sadr satisfy the requirements. we issued the permit. subsequent to that we received an appeal to this board where the department -- permit was suspended. in her documentation we found out she had required acc

president newlin: is the applicant hear? >> the applicant's husband is here. president newlin: this would be the king. welcome. >> good evening, commissioners. his wife happens to be traveling. you made an agreement -- which made an agreement with the police to go until 3:00 p.m. i was hoping for 4:00 a.m. but when we went out into the community and talked to the alliance no. 6, there is a representative here from community leadership alliance. they saw the need, a lot of those folks live in the neighborhood. part of the things they wanted was his food is good food and is inexpensive and offers an alternative to a hamburger or something else at that time and it is very popular. not everybody works nine to five. i just got wind of this that he made an agreement with the police at 3:00 a.m. and i think he should honor that. i wish he talked to me prior to that. i think you should be a man of your word and maybe we will look at it in a year and if there are no reports, may accept 4:00 a.m. at that point. he is here for any questions that you might have. commissio

applicants. applicants for s.n.a.p. benefits must declare they're a u.s. citizen or eligible alien. currently state agencies accept applicants, declarations of u.s. citizenships merely at face value. this leads an opportunity for applicants to provide fraudulent social security numbers to receive benefits. however, programs like s.a.v.e. take three to five seconds to verify an applicant and reduce instances of fraudulent immigration documents. in particular, the inspector general of the usda highlighted this problem in march when they reported the general had completed a database analysis of five state agencies. findings showed 8,594 recipients of s.n.a.p. benefits were receiving benefits with potentially invalid social security numbers. many applicants in these five states were -- in five states received improper payments by using the social security numbers of deceased individuals or providing invalid social security numbers. under current law, complicates who declare they're eligible aliens must provide state age y agencies with identification. this amendment would require the sa

any public comment on this application? seeing none, the item is with the commission. vice chair joseph: i would like to move that this item be continued by the request of the applicant until the following conditions are met -- there is a new security plan, they have met with neighborhood organizations, they have met with the police and worked out their differences, and then once that is all done, they can come back. that is my motion. is that a proper motion? to the call of the chair. thank you. president newlin: i just want to add, to the applicants -- >> and the citations are adjudicated. vice chair joseph: very good. thank you, captain. president newlin: if you have any questions about outreach, contact staff and they will advise you in the direction you need to go. we do not want you to come back and have an application that is unacceptable to us. we will have no problem denying your application if it is not done correctly writ -- not done correctly. do we have a motion? >> i wanted to add a friendly amendment that we get some sort of documentation of your communi

the application can be processed. but there are no other limitations to entering the program. >> i just want to note that the focus is on the smaller properties that the board sought discretion to approve any contracts. i believe the only potential historic district that is actively moving forward right now that i'm aware of is in district 8, which is north of the park and we have had a lot of a robust discussion and support. one of the concerns that homeowners have pointed out is that when you look at the promotion of the historic districts, it always talks about tax incentives. but in san francisco, because we administer -- the way that we administer it, those tax incentives are illusory because they cannot take advantage of them. i think this will generate more support for presentation -- preservation in the city. >> thank you. is there anyone from the public who would like to speak? please, come forward. we will limit it to two minutes per person. >> ♪ were sergeant pepper's lonely hearts club land ♪ i thought you

two units are occupy by the permit applicants adult children. the permit applicant appears to be removing up to 12 affordable rental housing units from the market. the planning commission should not reward those who removed affordable housing stock from the market by threatening the eviction of renters. with code exceptions which benefit these people financially to the detriment of the neighborhood. thank you. >> ok, any other speakers in favor of thedr? >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am here to represent the many units of 1490 affected by the crgarage deck. there are five units next to or above the proposed private unit. all of these units face security issues from the garage deck. there is no fire protection. the proposed building roof deck impacts these five units disproportionately as it is placed on their side of the building. this exposes them to additional noise and security issues of people climbing down a fire escape with direct access to their units. i will now read a statement regarding the impact of 1490 residents from the forme

there is a written description of the permit application. until you see the actual plan and do the proper plan review, we have a, schedule that we need to follow and that will be the review. i do not know with the early discussions with the entire scope of work has reflected in this discussion. >> when you said considerably low, i know you're not giving a specific number. >> it will be a square footage basis and we have a cost schedule that is very detailed and how much concrete might be removed. i would say that this is certainly -- at least $150,000. but taking the entire scope of the work, that is what we would look at. >> this issue about the transferability of the permit, can you address that? >> one second. under the building code, under section one of 6.4 0.1 0.1, transfer of permit. permits are transferable without payment of fees when the new owners of mets a letter to the department of agreeing to all conditions of approval, stipulations, and agreements. that is pretty typical. on the particular documents, violations, those issues

combined they are working with arc-touch to develop application soss that once these officers -- applications so that once he these officers are trained, arc-touch will be then in phase two developing applications so that various mobile devices in addition to the laptops, and eventually it will be tablets and then mobile applications that might be on their phones, to be able to access crime data, be able to utilize new technology in order to transfer speech and video into written reports that will make the officers very versatile in the field. that is important to stress. one of the problems we have always faced in both limited budget times and even robust times, is whenever you have to have an officer remove him or herself off the street, out of the the presence of the community, in to a station to write reports for several hours, that presence is missing. in order for the officialses to be had, we have to develop innovatively technology that offers access in a mobile way. that is what this relationship will do for us. it begins with this donation, but the essential part that will take place

there are a lot of interesting applications for this, by the way. this innovation and business model has not stopped. they have let this thing, but it is not over. that, to me, is the holy grail. this technology is going to enable people to build business models which you have never seen an economically allow things to happen which we have never seen. is that a short answer or long? >> that was just right. thank you. >> my next question leads into that with simon. you have developed some core virtual is asian technology. you have seen it be used in private clubs, in the enterprise setting, in public clouds. how do you see customers reacting to both private and public clouds, the challenges, the opportunities? >> [inaudible] because of the scary things out there, and because they have real humans who are scared of letting go of control. again, it is not so much a technology challenge as a human process challenge. it is really scary to let go of this thing you have been charged with looking after. it could be a regulatory environment, but it could jus

. >> is usually faxed the day after we receive the application. i find it hard to believe. >> we do attorneys around fairly quickly. this was a short time frame. in addition, this went through a planning -- there seems to be a breakdown with respect to law enforcement and the planning department. not sure for requires a notice on the building are not. i am not sure where the breakdown happened. we can investigate how and why they were just notified. this is not our protocol. >> it gets mailed to a pretty wide area of residence all the way round. if they had concerns, it would do -- there was a hearing at the planning department before it came here. the planning department said this business was allowed. that was easily 30 days. are posting after that is 10 days. >> i am telling you what my understanding and i am expressing our concerns regarding this permit. one of them is obviously security because there open late at night. lighting in the area because in that particular location, there is a back alleyway between where the child care center is an

we are here to support these applications. this is a way of mitigating crowns and noise, and i remember when working for the corporation in the '70s, i travelled around the united states, they would give the permits to mitigate crowd noise. i am here to support this application for the extended hours. >> thank you. >> thank you for having me. i am the owner and managing partner at the supper club of san francisco. we have the after hours permit and this has been a great thing. i think that -- for the monarchs, this would be a great step for the business model to succeed. the patrons will have more time to listen and dance to world class music. it would allow for increased time to go out and relax before they go out into the community. i believe this will greatly affect the neighborhood in positive ways. this has been a very big thing for the neighborhood. with our extended use, we do not have 300 people exiting the building at the same time. there is also less traffic and less congestion, and trying to get a cab at 1:45 can be

a number of applications filed with the fisa court and a number of applications, granted or denied and even that number doesn't break down between traditional fisa and the fisa amendments act and you don't know how many programs of surveillance have been authorized. you don't know how many have been approved by the court. you don't know how broad the programs have been and you don't know how many americans have been wiretapped as a result and you don't know what's been done and there are all sorts of crucial facts that have been withhell at least from the public and on top of that there is this question of the legal authority. so this is a complicated statute and there are legitimate questions about how it ought to be interpreted. we don't know how the obama administration is interpreting this statute because it hasn't disclosed even in redacted form the office of legal council memos and we don't know how the fisa court has inch prettiterpr statute baz we don't have the fisa court opinions. there was a process put in place a couple of years ago by the obama administration to declassify

then we have applications due october 26. they will be very detailed applications, we will probably do a pre-release to allow project sponsors in a little bit of time before hand to start developing those applications. they will change applications of the board changes the criteria. the funding framework will have to be fluid with that. but want to give them enough time to give us complete and detailed applications bu. 30 days will be the official, but we will do a pre-release, and that will probably be sometime in august. we want to give them six weeks to eight weeks. that is generally what we try to do. the screening in prayer decision criteria, i do not have a slight. page 154, we have that detail. the majority is from the ntc guidelines. it is differentiated in your packet. the italicized items are items we added in. to give you a couple examples, we are explicitly trying to prioritize projects that address multiple modes of travel. we're also prioritizing it safe routes to school projects from documenting walking audits.

the department really does not have much to add to the dispute between the applicant and the appellant in this case. a point of clarity, it appears to be how the notification was made. as is noted within the public works code, when it is a mobile food catering truck, the notification point is the midpoint of the block they are occupying. in this case, it was a mobile catering truck. therefore, as noted by the applicant, the notification from the business -- we found the middle of the block as the notification point. that is the definition under the current code. had the grill been within the 300 feet, the department would consider the sliders and the burgers as similar food and would most likely denied this. in this situation, it appears that the department follow the process as established under the code properly. notification was based on an affidavit by the company that was hired to provide the notification. there was no reason for the department not to believe this notification was incorrect. we believe we processed this in accordance with procedures and approved it appropriately.

. >> their specific issues from the applicant. one is as it relates to disability access for a variety of residents at this property. the other one is again the issue related to quality of life and various issues the applicant has submitted. there seems to be -- needs to be a balance in this case. it would add additional facilities that allow easy ingress and egress to be appropriate for the gate open during daylight hours which may or may not results of the quality of life issues, that is something we can make a determination on. >> asked us -- access for emergency vehicles, is there a requirement for the lock box? >> the understanding is that this was reviewed by the fire department and police department. they have determined that this facility satisfies their needs. the department would take that piece of information that we received as this is accessible to these emergency service vehicles. >> i have a couple of questions. the intended use was not for people to load and unload items and have access. someone from dpw advised in

>> the actual application? yes. supervisor campos: in application, it does not say anything about the type of license? >> it does not. supervisor campos: again, that is a very serious issue for me. i would hope that before the board is as to vote of this that there would be a complete verification of this so before the meeting you realize that you may be talking about two different kinds of licenses, because the transfer of the 47 licensed to a 48 establishment not only raises issues about that specific establishment, but larger policy questions that go into it. is it that abc did not give you the information -- is that probably what happened here? >> i would have to look through my files and verify that. the information is -- if there was an error on our part, i would not aware that would be. supervisor campos: following up on the question that supervisor kim asked, to your knowledge, has there ever been a transfer above 47 licensed with 48? >> not to my knowledge, but again, i of one person. it could have happened

any members of the public who want to address this application? ok, in terms of the lighting issue, before we take it over to the commission, do you guys have any objections to putting in some illumination? >> there will also be -- are sign will be box lighting. it'll be pretty bright. i am pretty sure there will be pretty good lighting as a result of the box lighting. >> would you be agreeable to work with the police department? >> absolutely. >> based on problems in the area? ok. all right. >> would to be willing to put a light in the alley? even if it was a motion detector? >> we can work something out, definitely, yes. >> all right. the matter is with the commission. you said you had some kind of a neighborhood meeting more something -- or something. was the police invited to something? >> that was during the public hearing. >> there is no liquor, right? what is your policy if someone wanted to bring their own? >> no way. >> you would have a security guard or a doorman? >> yes. >> do you have any age restrictions? >> we do not have an age rest