essentially what rush's arguing and what what many women's rights advocates will argue is that women's perceived intellectual inferiority is not a result of some kind of natural or biological force, but instead, because they have been prohibited to have the same kind of as men. right. and is what is attempted to be rectified. okay. and this is still quite limited in scope, right they're not arguing for universal women's education. instead these so-called ladies, young ladies, female academies that are going to be are really targeted at, relatively elite young white women. right. those who are pretty well-off. but there's also a kind political purpose to this, too, which i'll get to in a minute. what's notable about these female academies is that they're not only to include in the curriculum these traditional so-called feminine arts like dance and music and sewing, those kinds of things. but also curriculum that had generally been towards young men or gendered masculine rite, only appropriate young men such as history science, geography and arithmetic to name a few, right were what we m

argue and i have argued in my own party and i— argue and i have argued in my own party and i argue tonights — anything. but i will always make sure it's scotland especially with these _ sure it's scotland especially with these other people who said that we would _ these other people who said that we would be _ these other people who said that we would be an independent scotland, who wanted to that scotland. i am 'ust who wanted to that scotland. i am just pleased we do not see that today— just pleased we do not see that today because it feels like we would be living _ today because it feels like we would be living in — today because it feels like we would be living in some sort of banana republic under the snp. i want to make _ republic under the snp. i want to make sure — republic under the snp. i want to make sure we move forward now is a country _ make sure we move forward now is a count . �* make sure we move forward now is a count .�* ,, ., ., country. and presumably, you want to due process — country. and presumably, you want to due process to — country. and presumably, you want to d

a lot of trump supporters would argue _ towards.ump supporters would argue that biden _ towards. a lot of trump supporters would argue that biden hasn't - towards. a lot of trump supporters j would argue that biden hasn't done enough on immigration. i would argue that biden hasn't done enough on immigration.— enough on immigration. i really can't that? _ enough on immigration. i really can't that? this _ enough on immigration. i really can't that? this is _ enough on immigration. i really can't that? this is where - enough on immigration. i really can't that? this is where we - enough on immigration. i really i can't that? this is where we have seen biden try to shore up weaker part of his re—election and moved to the centre on his immigration policies, trying to safeguard against some of those criticisms. when it comes to the border with mexico, there will be a lot of talk about that, how we deal with immigrants in america. we have seen biden pivot towards the centre there. it does have the flexibility to do so. he doesn't have any

i'd argue as a case in point. southern slaveholders literally pulled their hair and nash their teeth when california came into the union as a free state only defined that their tantrums were were completely unwarranted. through the 1850s, california voted with the slave south on almost all the major issues of the day including the kansas-nebraska act and the dred scott decision. and that's largely because of this guy here william gwinn. when was california's ranking senator through most of the 1850s at the exact same time that he continued to operate by proxy a massive plantation with about 200 slaves in natchez, mississippi. in california, when ran this really well-oiled political machine, which basically maintained a monopoly on all the big federal jobs in the state, which he then packed with all his white southern friends. so even though white southerners never really amounted to much more than about 30% of the state's total population. they won election after election after election. in other words, this reall

i would argue, reality, i'm not gonna argue up is down hot is cold, black is why not argue with conspiracy. there's, you're right. i will follow in the mud with people with others. yes. but that's kind of that's, that's kind of big. the big abstract point. the specific point is you can't avoid some of these people more. we live in a well now where, you know, there was a time when a lot people say to me, well, you know, you do what you do. i'm going to keep my head done. none of us can keep our heads down anymore. if you're in the united states, for example, as we are right now, democracy is existentially threatened. one of the 2 major political parties has been taken over by near fascists, cultist conspiracy theorists. authoritarians, this scenario, which you can say, well, you know, i'm just going to my, my business. that's for them. this is for me know, the arguments coming to you whether you want to or not. what i find frustrating is i see liberals left is progressive, small di democrats, who may have the facts and the figures. we've got the truth, but they can't persuade other people.

so i think those who want to argue that secession was somehow legitimate can argue that it was legitimate in that it was an act of revolution that was anticipated by the political the political theory of the declaration those on the other side who want to insist that it was definitively not legitimate also something to rely on. and that's why there was a war, you know, that's why we fought a war over this. that leaves the question of whether the outcome of the war. it tells you that one side was right or wrong. that's the might makes right theory of history it may or may not be true descriptively. it's probably not true morally and normatively. i guess my concluding thought on all of this is that it's amazing to me how much we as americans still care about these questions and i think this is why we have a national constitution center. it's why we struggle to try to get constitutional questions right today. it's because these issues are central to who we are as a people and that's the best thing you can say about our constitution gives us a mechanism for arguing about who we are that is be

you could be cynical and argue it is not really that helpful - argue it is not really that helpful if the road, in fact the software is watching your eyes, then a lot of drivers might not bother with it. you must remember that the hands of function is optional. we would encourage that's because it shows that the driver is engaged. the whole point of the driver monitoring system is to make sure the driver is engaged. i have used this system and it is quite a lot. i was sceptical at the beginning thinking i am not quite sure what the benefit is, but over long distances to fatigue of driving on non—born straight motorways, it allows the driver to relax, heads allows the car to support them in the long, boring driving on motorways. it isjust there to ensure that the driver is engaged in the driving task. in other news: consumers are swapping from fresh to frozen food in a bid to combat rising grocery prices, according to retailers. data from the research firm kantar shows frozen food is outperforming fresh in supermarkets at the moment with frozen chicken, ready meals, pizzas and chips ar

some had argued _ position in the first place. some had argued there _ position in the first place.ed there was a conflictl position in the first place. some l had argued there was a conflict in interest between the fact that the chief executive, who was married to the first minister, was obviously overseeing a contest in which some would argue there was a conflict of interest. some of the new... humza yousaf portrayed himself as a continuity candidate. the majority of snp politicians wanted humza yousaf to be elected. there was a conflict of interest with the husband of the former first minister being in charge of the contest. there were also questions over the financial row.— financial row. thank you for brin . in: financial row. thank you for bringing us _ financial row. thank you for bringing us up _ financial row. thank you for bringing us up to _ financial row. thank you for bringing us up to date - financial row. thank you for bringing us up to date from j financial row. thank you for - bringing us up to date from glasgow. you will find more detail about all the stories, incl

i _ argue the leaks? are you concerned about the leaks? i am _ argue the leaks? _ about the leaks? i am not concerned about the leakages, i _ about the leaks? i am not concerned about the leakages, i am _ about the leaks? i am not concerned about the leakages, i am concerned | about the leakages, i am concerned that the happened, but there is nothing contemporaneous that i am aware of which is of a big consequence.— aware of which is of a big conseuuence. . i. _, . aware of which is of a big conseuuence. �* ,, .., . ., consequence. are you concerned about relationships _ consequence. are you concerned about relationships with _ consequence. are you concerned about relationships with our _ consequence. are you concerned about relationships with our allies? _ consequence. are you concerned about relationships with our allies? paul - relationships with our allies? paul adams— relationships with our allies? paul adams gave us an update. in relationships with our allies? paul adams gave us an update.- relationships with our allies? paul adams gave us an update. in has

i am sure they would argue that is what they are trying . argue that is what they are trying to do, andon issues, but hillsborough, the famousjimmy hillsborough, the famous jimmy mcgovern hillsborough, the famousjimmy mcgovern film, there is no real analogy for what happened at grenfell but in terms of the failure of public policy and failure of systems, that was made seven or eight years after hillsborough and formed part of the campaign that we have seen going on for 30 years. do you not see any rule for giving voice to a much wider number of people, some of the horrors that underpinned the grenfell disaster? i underpinned the grenfell disaster? i canjust say that underpinned the grenfell disaster? i can just say that i underpinned the grenfell disaster? i canjust say that i am really can just say that i am really surprised that there has been such a backlash, but it is really heartfelt. in the way here i had several phone calls and spoke to people from the next—of—kin, from survivors and people in the community, saying, tell them that we are hurt and we are still hurting, we're still

stevens argued that the anti-slavery principles of the founding were fundamentally wrong. they rested on the assumption as he put it of the equality of races. he called this an error a sandy foundation. unlike the new and improved constitution. he helped draft for the new confederate states of america. nevertheless in the decade leading up to the civil war lincoln's main political target was not slave owning southerners. but complacent white northerners especially those led by senator stephen douglas lincoln criticized his notion of popular sovereignty because it was neutral on the slave question. douglas believed that whites at the local level whether in the states or federal territories had the right to decide the question without interference. from congress in other words whether slavery would expand or diminish in the united states under douglas's definition of popular sovereignty would be determined not by a majority of all american citizens, but by a very small majority of the settlers who went to live in western territories, in reference to the enslavement of black

democrats for the longest time argued, do it clean, do it easy. raise the debt ceiling, no dwdwau default, no problem. and today, in front of that audience on wall street, he started to outline what a house republican plan would look like. here's some of what he said. >> a no strings attached debt limit increase will not pass in the coming weeks, the house will vote on a bill to lift the debt ceiling into the next year. save taxpayers trillions of dollars. make us less dependent on china. curve our high inflation all without touching social security and medicare. >> katie, as we have talked about in other contexts, an outline, an 8-second sound bite version of a plan is not a bill that you can put on the floor and pass, and the response from senate democrats and from the white house thus far has been, okay, nice start, what's your real plan? what is your plan. kevin mccarthy wants to get into the oval office. he wants to sit down with joe biden and negotiate this and democrats have been putting up a pretty united front so far that they're not goin

professor, let me start with you tonight, that they will argue that this argue is all based on a faulty legal theory. greg jarrett has made that case many times on this programl and that, in fact, this has never been done before. secondly, will argue about. the statute of limitations. thirdly, seco they will argue, mostnd importantly, perhaps, that o they will seek a dismissale argu based on the argument ofmentf pa prosecutorial misconduct and selective prosecution. those are arguments that youi t have made. the i think all three of them are strong.e and i think there's a strong str oncase that you should havege o a change of venue, because i don't think new york is going to be fair to donald trump.>> ti >> that's right.t i wa president we get to that, i want to mention that president trump called me a couple of days ago to thankay me for writing at trump and tell everybody to read it.r and in the conversation, hetrum said , i know you like to say you vote for me. i suspect you actually did. but in that conversation, hee fo asked me for advice. and i said one piece of advice. for you bu

would you argue it's based upon what i would call faulty legal theory bragg is arguing that a mere misrepresentation, when you misrepresent something on a government document in other words recording a payment of money as a legal expense which by the way hillary clinton did herself is by itself criminal and it becomes a felony simply because the purpose may have been to violate a federal not a state campaign statute. that's never happened before. i'm sure you're going to argue that the charges are barred by the statute of limitations and i think you will also argue and seek a dismissal based upon the argument of prosecutorial misconduct and selective prosecution because going after one man one company one family. >> i'm going to ask them to show me another case where this has ever been done because it's nevada bun done. by the way sean you said something that's not accurate but is important. you said filing a government document. that's the point. nothing was filed here. had donald trump tried to assert a tax deduction. >> by the way, you are right. you're right in your correction. i agree with you.

and are you arguing that some of those eentent— arguing that some of those content creators— arguing theory. practically a conspiracy theory. it's practically a conspiracy theory. tte-tte— practically a conspiracy theory. tte-tte ttwe. — practically a conspiracy theory. it's-it's true. it's- practically a conspiracy theory. it's-it's true. it's not- it's true. it's true. it's not a conspiracy theory, but it's not. it true. it's not true it is true. it's not true eeeewee— it is true. it's not true teeeewee t— it is true. it's not true because i didn't- 2 it's not true because i didn't care about it is true. it's not true- because i didn't care about the tente— because i didn't care about the rights-lesbian- because i didn't care about the rights-lesbian or- rights of gay or lesbian or tene— rights of gay or lesbian or tvene peepte— rights of gay or lesbian or trans people qatar because trans people in qatar because eeeewee— trans people in qatar because teeeewee et— trans people in qatar because because of oil— trans people in qatar because because of oil prices, i cared eeewt— becaus

ole, let’s say i don’t argue, i won’t grind.hout vanikov, i do not argue, nor the hammer without vanikov. so yes, yes, blue will ask others rose to the screen. dancing. uh-huh yes, this is your refusal to give up to stray sleep and the offensive time to take without doubles or caressing points. what about when they sneeze? true, they have jih we grew up. logical dictionaries are sleeping alone. yes, yes, neither sleep nor ears, it’s that they refused to believe, and the pistons grew. here everything is befitting. i won't fight you. i will accept this rejection. let's check. come on come on don't i argue, i won’t beg, without vannikov. dancing velmeshki, neil sleep did not learn anything from the generator you horseshoes clicked the prize kolka with a score. propanuya kali weasel is for the fact that you are so reasonable, 30 balashi. chanon seas hanna i think that let's see that they are cunning from their undercap in the fog of velmira, they are no match and have reached, spittingly different screens of the first cakes. what do

and so that's sort of what historians argue in popular memory. it's often a little bit less complicated. you know, if you pick up a popular history of the american revolution or watch a film about the american revolution, you're likely to encounter a narrative that presents the heroic revolutionaries rising against the oppressions of the villainous british right. and tonight, i want to offer a different way of thinking about the coming of the american revolution, one that focuses on how information mobilizes the political behavior of ordinary. and a lot of the argument about what brought about the american revolution comes down, really, i think, to what you what you think about a much broader question, which is why do people engage in politics in the first place? i think it's a good question. politics, after all, is is very inconvenient. i have a three month old at home. and i can tell you just getting out the door to vote on tuesday was was quite a challenge. we've all got busy lives. it's not you know, it's very pleasant. it's annoying even to

and in his appeal, the attorney argued he was denied a fair trial and argued the judge should have moved the case. but the justice said justice was served. >>> melanoma. new cancer vaccine technology is being tested for melanoma. it grows fast and spreads and can return after removal. the vaccine is uniquely designed for each patient. one person said the decision to take part in the trial was easy. >> i have a belief in science and it's just really cool that something on a vaccine level could be targeted to an individual's case or situation. >> ahead on "nbc nightly news," what trials have shown and what this drug has in common with the covid vaccine coming up at 6:30. >>> after a tense game one, what is going to happen tonight in game two? the warriors and kings, this is a live look at the golden 1 center in sacramento. hopefully they don't light the beam tonight. warriors fans don't want them to light the beam. >> no. >> anthony flores is courtside next. give y your small l business one tetech solutioion that checkcks all the e boxe. it''s all hehere with ththe comcmcast busineness com

>> what the state argued to the jury is that there was evidence to show that mr.ked despite, and i think the jury had heard the evidence and took that evidence very seriously. >> that fight leading the jury to find perry guilty of murder. >> i believe they used that against him saying this isn't self-defense, you have already contemplate of what you would do in the scenario and it has come up to shooting or deaths of another and here was her opportunity to do so. >> texas is 1 of 30 states in the country stand your ground laws. geico stand your ground laws are meant to allow victims of violence, whether it be nondeadly or deadly force, to act without the need of retreating. and with so many guns out there, stand your ground laws and the ability to react without even seeing force but maybe it's just reasonable, could lead to unfortunately far more deaths like that of foster. >> that same summer a similar case rocked the country. >> a group of men, many armed, had been patrolling the area where the violence happened. >> 17-year-old kyle rittenhouse shot three men, k

a bit more of the mitigation john cooper casey was arguing on i john cooper casey was arguing on behalfthat is key is because that would be seen as an aggravating factor in a crime like this, if the person was seen to have premeditated plan the attack in advance. john cooper is arguing cashman didn't engage in substantial planning or preparation for the shooting. it should be noted he was carrying two weapons at the time of the shooting, both of which were used in the attack. the court is rising briefly for 5—10 minutes so they are now taking a break and we expect to get more details imminently.— taking a break and we expect to get more details imminently. thank you for that update, _ more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. _ more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i _ more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i will- more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i will come| for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, i just for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, ijust paused there to get the latest from

and many would argue. as _ franchise. and many would argue. as you _ franchise.ay, we - franchise. and many would | argue, as you say, we have franchise. and many would - argue, as you say, we have been there, we have done that, and we know the actors who are fantastic at the time. should we not be thinking of new, original stories?— original stories? exactly. well, the _ original stories? exactly. well, the problem - original stories? exactly. well, the problem that l original stories? exactly. i well, the problem that you original stories? exactly. - well, the problem that you have is you have the streaming services that need massive hits right away and they are afraid to invest in untested, untried new concept. they want to base their biggest bets around intellectual property, we call it ip, but people actually know, so in addition to the harry potter franchise that is going to be rolled out there will be a prequel for game of thrones, there is going to be a spin—off of the big bang theory, american tv show, and there will be a spin—off of a character from the

, strongly argued, whimsical, and absurd.- turns evasive, strongly argued, whimsical, and absurd. not the ceo of twitter. — whimsical, and absurd. i'm not the ceo of twitter. my _ whimsical, and absurd. i'm not the ceo of twitter. my dog _ whimsical, and absurd. i'm not the ceo of twitter. my dog is - whimsical, and absurd. i'm not the ceo of twitter. my dog is the - whimsical, and absurd. i'm not the ceo of twitter. my dog is the ceo. i ceo of twitter. my dog is the ceo. he's a great dog. the pain level of twitter has been extremely high. it hasn't been some sort of party. so, it's been really quite a stressful situation. where there are many mistakes made along the way because mark of course. you mistakes made along the way because mark of course-— mark of course. you so you don't know what _ mark of course. you so you don't know what you're talking - mark of course. you so you don't know what you're talking about. | mark of course. you so you don't . know what you're talking about. you can even give _ know what you're talking about. wm. can even give me a simple example of cont

. >> does it live in what ways argued in this courtroom -- or is the truth locked up in this prison. >> this is my cry for justice. you will hear a judge decide where the truth prevails >> times square, bustling with tourists, vibrant and safe except, it wasn't always lik this new york was in turmoil. crime was out of control and then came a moment new yorker said enough is enough, murder of a young tourist on a manhattan subway platform just a few blocks from where i' standing it's a murder that would hav consequences for the city, and one man for the next quarter century. >> it was labor day weekend, 1990 a sunday - the u.s. open tennis tournamen was in full swing. thousands of tourists had come to new york to see it. among them was brian watkins, college student and a tennis player from utah, who is the are along with his family. >> - that's why they were here. >> journalism professor an writer bill hughes has followe the story for years. >> the tennis game was delayed that day so they were out a bit later than they expected >> as the watkins family heade out to dinner about 9:30

>> they will argue the allegation is made up by e. jean carroll.ll say there is a problem in the lack of specificity. e. jean carroll does not know the day, the time of year, does not even know the year. she claims it was 1995 or 1996. they are going to say that means donald trump can't defend himself. if she pinpointed a day, who knows, maybe trump was out of town that a day, maybe he has an alibi witness. they're going to argue she's been supported and spurred on by political opponents of donald trump and there's some truth to that. doesn't mean she's lying, but it certainly is fair game for the jury to take into account. >> carroll's attorneys know all of this. >> yes. >> how do they protect themselves against that line from the trump team? >> i think they're going to argue you have to look at all the factors, the corroborating witnesses. i think the two witnesses she told at the time will be important. i think they're going to say he is not shhere, he didn't have t guts to take the stand and subject himself to cross-examination unlike -- i'm pl

can't argue with that analysis.upgrade yet. ♪ when you're a small-business owner, your to-do list can be... a lot. ♪ [ buttons clicking ] that's why progressive makes it easy to save with a commercial auto quote online, so you can take on all your other to-dos. already did. see if you could save at progressivecommercial.com. >>> it doesn't really look like spring, but this is florida in april. it's a hailstorm that's sweeping through the south and take a look at this. hail hammering parked cars. not something you would typically want to see in the sunshine state. and it wasn't just florida. this is texas. i'm going to show it to you in a second. it's probably not the best time for a swim in your pool. meantime, i want you to take a look at wisconsin. this is a before and after shot of some of the extreme flooding we're seeing along the mississippi river, where voluntary evacuations are already underway for a lot of riverside towns. let's get an update now from cnn's meteorologist, chad myers, who's live for us in th

many would argue there is no excuse _ well. many would argue there is no excuse when _ well.rgue there is no excuse when it comes to i no excuse when it comes to choice and price, but having said that, many are very sceptical about, you know, these sort of fair trade brands and other marks as to how much does go towards the farmers, so does go towards the farmers, so do explain. does go towards the farmers, so do explain-_ do explain. when you choose a fairtrade easter _ do explain. when you choose a fairtrade easter road - do explain. when you choose a fairtrade easter road that i fairtrade easter road that means you are picking a product where the fairtrade minimum price and people were paid back to cocoa farmers, when we talk about cocoa farmers, you are talking about family farms and small holder farms. talking about family farms and small holderfarms. a huge impact that that has and that minimum price and premium is absolutely critical and will have been paid when you choose a fairtrade egg and it is completely unique to fairtrade that you have those price interventions

we would argue there is alread a situation? we would argue there is already a business _ situation?e there is already a business test in place - situation? we would argue there isi already a business test in place but we know _ already a business test in place but we know that doesn't work because our welfare — we know that doesn't work because our welfare officers have been reporting hundreds of cases to local authorities— reporting hundreds of cases to local authorities and it does not work so what _ authorities and it does not work so what we _ authorities and it does not work so what we want is the legislation to be strengthened. this already exists in scotland _ be strengthened. this already exists in scotland so they are ahead of us. we are _ in scotland so they are ahead of us. we are behind in england. legislation does exist in england but for— legislation does exist in england but for dogs. we would like the legislation to be updated to include rabbits _ legislation to be updated to include rabbits and that would mean breeders would _ rabbits and that would mean breeders wo

you know, nobody would argue _ reduced. you know, nobody would argue it _ reduced.it is acceptable that we come out of a _ argue it is acceptable that we come out of a festival of racing with three — out of a festival of racing with three dead horses. the country's second most _ three dead horses. the country's second most popular— three dead horses. the country's second most popular spectator i three dead horses. the country's - second most popular spectator sport continued today, but racing once again finds itself under pressure to become safer for those involved. again finds itself under pressure to become saferfor those involved. dan roan, bbc news. the brecon beacons national park is to be known only by its welsh name in future. park officials say the switch to bannau brycheiniog will help celebrate the area's culture. bannau is the welsh plural for peaks, while brycheiniog refers to a fifth century king. authorities say the english name references wood—burning carbon emitting beacons, which no longer fits with the park's ethos. a 200—year—old bridge linking sc

that is, there will be nothing to argue, not just about nothing.figures who argue to the pope or the pope to us is an option. dad will not fly to us. that is, if still, well , it's you who have fun in this way, only you go to dad, and then to the grave. so you simply won’t have any other options, and ukraine. and now we really have it, that is, we need to understand this depth. uh, this is the problem of ukrainians will not, and not just cease to exist. they will be the most scattered nationality. it will be scattered throughout the world. that is, they are there someone assimilates, someone there young ladies will marry men. well, then they go in the service and quickly change, it is necessary to change their nationalities and ukrainians. they just disappear like that, and they lead exactly to this, and that's when, when they even very actively told yes, that is, we are for a little bit. we are ukraine, we need this. yes a not now. now, already under the poles, you can already go to europe, you can already mean to dispose of the entire population.

and are you arguing that some of those content— arguing that some of those content creators— arguing think that's practically conspiracy theory. practically a conspiracy theory. it's practically a conspiracy theory. n-s-ws— practically a conspiracy theory. n-s-ws true. — practically a conspiracy theory. it's-it's true. it's- practically a conspiracy theory. it's-it's true. it's not- it's true. it's true. it's not a conspiracy theory, but it's not. it true. it's not true it is true. it's not true because— it is true. it's not true because i— it is true. it's not true because i didn't- c it's not true because i didn't care about it is true. it's not true- because i didn't care about the neme— because i didn't care about the rights-lesbian- because i didn't care about the rights-lesbian or- rights of gay or lesbian or trans— rights of gay or lesbian or trees people— rights of gay or lesbian or trans people qatar because trans people in qatar because because— trans people in qatar because because of— trans people in qatar because because of oil— trans people in qatar because because of o

prosecutors argued teixeira could still have access to hundreds of documents.nger has access to those documents, saying prosecutors are exaggerating their client's threat. court documents filed by the u.s. attorney's office wednesday argue teixeira should not be released on bail, claiming he pose as serious flight risk, writing he could take refuge with a foreign adversary to avoid the reach of u.s. law. prosecutors claim the information teixeira allegedly accessed far exceeds what has been disclosed on the internet. the filing also includes pictures from the search warrant executed on teixeira's bedroom. the photos show a gun locker next to his bed containing multiple weapons, including an ak-style high capacity weapon, handguns, shotgun rifles, and a gas mask. prosecutors say law enforcement also found a smashed tablet, a laptop, and a gaming console in a dumpster at the home. prosecutor says teixeira also obstructed justice by telling those he was communicating with online to delete all messages. and if anyone comes looking, don't tell them expletive. prosec

can't argue with the facts. xfinity mobile is one of the fastest growing mobile services, now with over 5 million customers and counting. save hundreds a year over t-mobile, at&t and verizon. talk to our switch squad at your local xfinity store today. we moved out of the city so our little sophie could appreciate nature. but then he got us t-mobile home internet. i was just trying to improve our signal, so some of the trees had to go. i might've taken it a step too far. (chainsaw revs) (tree crashes) (chainsaw continues) (daughter screams) let's pretend for a second that you didn't let down your entire family. what would that reality look like? well i guess i would've gotten us xfinity... and we'd have a better view. do you need mulch? what, we have a ton of mulch. >>> in our health lead, a woman suing the state of texas after being denied an abortion told lawmakers not receiving abortion care harmed her mental health and may prevent her from having children in the future. >> i wanted to address my senators. i n