because they have . always they have their energy security that we have now trump so much so it's really kind of interesting is that the you know she's angry at the americans and now the other european countries going to be angry with her because she's putting her country's energy interests above the e.u. she is seemingly the leader of the e.u. in the eyes of the liberal world i think what we see here is a total victory i deal with aggression if i go what you're already konami interests because look which are the most problematic. it's in europe italy and greece they're the most indebted ones so the russian project team which was supposed to supply cheap russian energy to the state it could solve the problems you know italy and greece could have industries revived so what happened the e.u. as an ideological organization killed the souls to project you haven't. let me tell you you know now the united states which is even more ideal with us than the european union he skated north stream to project which wa

of that identity, because of their race, because of their religion, because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. and that if you do that, it's not just a crime against that person. it's a crime against a whole community. because gay people, or african americans, or latinos, or jewish people, you live in greater fear knowing that that person doing it for that reason might come after somebody else. so that the enhanced penalty, the additional crime, time tacked onto the sentence, is a result of it being not just against the person, but against a community. that's the idea of a hate crime. so what the law did, they federalized it and said, "well, if mississippi, say, doesn't want to prosecute it because they don't see prosecuting a murder of a gay person where there's ample evidence that it was because of their sexual orientation, then the federal government can step in." so the us attorney from mississippi, who reports to the us attorney general, can take that case on and prosecute it. and that was the real impact, saying that the united states isn't going to mess around with p

because they do. because again, if they lose -- what happens is that they now report that they're making, say, $12 an hour. and three months later they have to report for child care assistance that they're receiving, or food stamps, and they get cut. they just get cut off. and at that point that parent has to make the decision, i cannot afford to go to work. and this is why i think we really believe in the eic. because that's more of a curve. as employees earn more, the tax credit is lower, but they see their wages going up. we could have that conversation. but now you're making this much money, and you don't need those services. and that's the true economic power of lifting people up. so the benefit cliff is very real. and i believe that employers suffer a lot from the benefit cliff because of employees quitting because they cannot afford to go to work. it's something i think we talked about on the state level, we have to look at how do you have a gradual staging-off process as workers are training s

backed by germany do they blocked it why because of sanctions because they. don't like income and now they're doing this north stream turenne which is the second. of the main energy pipeline to europe another building a second one but you're germany. the germans are fine with it no problem ok. because they have. those they have their energy security that we have now trope. so it's really kind of interesting is that she's angry at the americans and now the other european countries going to be angry with her because she's putting her country's energy interests above the e.u. she is seemingly the leader of the e.u. in the eyes of the liberal world i think what we see here is a total victory i deal with the aggressor if i go with your over economic interests because look which are the most problematic countries in europe italy and greece they are the most indebted ones so the russian project saltine which was supposed to supply cheap russian energy to the states it could solve the evils programs you know italy and greece could have industries revived so what happ

and the state will have to be accountable to them, not just because they're the voters but because they're where the wealth is; they're where the money is; they're where the resources are. and instead of having fancy ideas about how to democratize the old examples of socialism and c communism, this is a practical way to institutionalizize the powewer t the base of t the mass of peopl. closing point--whetherer or not i've persuaded you, let me invite you to take a look at this book. and the point of this book, which is new, is simply to make the best case i can, which, you know, an hour of conversation doesn't allow me to do, but the best case i can for what i've e been talking about. but the real reason to pursue these ideas are two, two real reasons. one--you will not hear a word about them from the established voices of this culture. nnot from the reblicicans, not from the democrats. they won't make a criticism of the system because they're cheerleaders for the system. whatever their disagreements, it's never about this system. if you want to think critically, you have to go somewhere el

egypt because of the torture of these guys and saudi's because of ideology. we need to hold these guys accountable because they are the first people who will be targeted and get hurts by this terrorist threat. how we combat it differs pick i think in the us we need to create a space, a cyberspace for the good people. of the bad have a stasis. you can go on and radicalized yourself to be a white supremacist or be jihadi or any kind of big it online, but where is my space in your space? it doesn't exist and that something we are doing now, creating a new 5o1c3, a campaign to bring in madison avenue in bringing silicon valley together in order to create a platform that can be inclusive, american platform, who we are as a nation , a melting pot, sought-- training today and help. ronald reagan used to say you can live in england, but you will never be considered an englishman. you can live in france, but you can never be called a frenchman. but, if you live in america you are an american. lesko back to that. that's what made america great. we cannot say, okay this

because that is not how much i weigh. the fact is that what we did was we copied successful models and i could tell you really quickly the first thing we did was we started as a part-time out of school program. some of you heard of upper bound. i went through an upper bound program. right? i'm not just a hair club president. i was a poor minority student who was going to be the first in the family to go to college. so i went through a part-time program. went through that. then the other thing we did was we copied what we saw in successful private schools. so we went to visit successful private schools. at the time there were not really any charter schools when we started our first school. so we couldn't go visit charter schools. the magnate schools were just getting started. so we went to visit them. and what we found was they were absolutely the same. i need you to hear this. upper bound programs served kids who were not supposed to be on track to go to college. these elite new england prep schools are supposed to serve

played out now does a lot is because it that whole place. in a live show so don't post here that you know. it is bad just. a jolly. good barbeque for about the good. cause i don't know that might possibly go for the cell phone with a cell phone. but gee investigate the police officers behavior as well. hell to try. so what. i do. with all make this manufacture consent to the public will. when the ruling classes protect themselves. in the final. we can all middle the roots to. the real need to really. sit politicking until pollack senior editor at large an in-house counsel of fright barton is my guest so thanks for sticking around let's get back to our conversation and move towards donald trump's credibility especially donald trump's credibility as it comes to his firing of f.b.i. director james comey we saw him testifying capitol hill we saw donald tweets and aftermath interviews following that where does donald trump's credibility stand today i think it's very solid i think the most important thing that establishes his credibility is the cl

let me think that a lot of them that are here have written because you actually know it just yet you're still dealing with any of that do you think i think that you're exaggerating out of the if necessary thank you for your time it's not serious ok thank you very much i feel like thank you. the international makes we've got the evolutionary biologist richard dawkins he's the guest on worlds apart that's next. long welcome to worlds apart piece by dan president the pace of scientific breakthroughs humanity still seems to be as far away from the age of reason as ever with really just extremism and political infantilism spreading around the globe aiding each other has the idea of governance based on critical thinking already become a delusion to discuss that amount joined by evolutionary biologist richard dawkins mr dawkins it's great to talk to you thank you very much for your time now this is your first time in russia in st petersburg and this is a city that has long traditions of critical thinking of secularism but also a very in a jet a religious community which called for the cancella

well it is interesting lanny because this really has become the story as well as some of the scandals of the administration versus their week on infrastructure of the week on energy that they are that they've been discussing this last week and it's really taken away from one of the biggest policy. goals which is that repealing and replacing obamacare now just this week the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell had to move that vote from this week after the july fourth recess because they simply don't have the votes and they're certainly not getting coverage in the coverage that they are is showing a nearly thirteen percent approval rating by the american people when it comes to health care this new plan in the senate what do you think is that correlation between the media coverage and health care and health care even has a chance anymore. but either way there may be some change about trying to get a vote done before the research says so i'm not sure. changing situation going on but look i think president trump has to learn how to govern and to get things done by working with congress

because. it was the right time for the. pianist there's no way i'm going to change and become better you didn't get the choice to be brought into this life but every man every woman has the choice. and i think that should be seen as noble and we should be able to talk about it so i try to. make. good. plus i have a particular perspective on human being. whereas you are. next on larry king. welcome to larry king. earlier bachmann on the comedy silicon valley has an upcoming comedy special also on h.b.o. called t j miller meticulously ridiculous he hosts the goldberger show on comedy central and can be heard in the upcoming in moji movie in which he plays the starring role of the met and moji i have no idea what that means i'm not sure i can afford something from allie of silicon valley will air june twenty fifth and meticulously ridiculous airs june seventeenth both are. slated to come. out and i'm certain. you know one of. those and almost to me absolutely but i'll take them off to one of your heart in question what is t.j.

because they're doing an exception. because they're doing the right thing.hat. i don't feel, it's a fact that italy is the only major european country which has not suffered a terror attack. there are theories why this is happening and one of them is that because italy has been through the 705 and 805 and dealing with terrorism in a very kind of con5tant, daily way, they have found a way of controlling the territory, which means that possible 5u5pect5 are identified and removed and even deported even before they start becoming radicali5ed, which is different to france and britain, where they tend to have a kind of surveillance. you cannot survey people like that. because there are too many. you need to have something much more preventive, more at the start of the process of radicalisation. terrified of touching them here in britain. that is the problem. can i intervene quickly? please. just to say, in defence of the british security forces and the american security forces, it's always difficult in a democracy under the rule of law to control terrorism. the m

because i don't. believe that to those of ministers on. the sitting on. the coach deficient in. the law. legally. going to live in a limbo so those fellows you give. you. just. have to leave the last that you somebody. took a barbecue or not that i. was i don't know that my father bought the board itself it was a set up i think so. but do you investigate the police officers behavior as well. i'll take drugs in the west then stand up in the presence here. calmly people as you clearly are. going to want to sell you on the idea that dropping bombs brings peace to the chicken hawks forcing you to fight the battles they don't. produce offspring to tell you that they'll be gossip and probably worthwhile for the most important news today. off the madness has been telling you are not cool enough unless you buy their product. all the hawks that we along the border will want. hundreds of protesters are gathering in central london urging to reserve may to step down following the grunfeld tower disaster. russia's foreign minister demands an explanation from the u.s. side with the recent sho

you know, we know, on some level, how to fight, because that's what we do. you know, it's just a part of, like, being in our own culture. it's like, you know, like, being in a place that's hostile to our very existence, because there are done... you know, that that's where you put the pollution, and that's where you put the bad schools. this is where all these things happen, and so we're used to having things done to us, but on some level, we had to recognize that there were things that we needed to really step up and recognize what we wanted, ourselves. >> hinojosa: so this connection, you know, a lot of times when you hear people talk about environment-- the environmental movement-- it is; you're looking at parks, you're looking at, you know, the arctic, you're looking at these things. how do... what... how does the conversation need to change so that people understand it is our environment, wherever we live? >> people really only need three things: something to love, something to do, something to feel hopeful about. that doesn't change for anybody-- i don

stop that once and for all because it is so distasteful.this family is not an exception, this family is typical of that hypocritical postwar generation revolutionthe sexual and i'm actually quite happy that that has been exposed. >> wow. [laughter] >> yeah. [laughter] >> i was going to ask each of you to give me what is helmut kohl's legacy? you said at the beginning. it is german unification. 50 years from now, the history books will tell you helmut kohl was the unifier of germany. helmut kohl had a strong role in the unification of europe and nobody will talk about his marriages and why and why not and what was the party donations scandal. >> let's go back to german unification. i was idea 20 seconds from each of you. has german reunification been a success story? >> overall, it is. there whovictims out , nevertheless it is a huge success story. >> absolutely. many people were losers of it and they need to be made winners again. >> i agree. a success story and an ongoing task. .> thanks very much we have been talking about the legacy of h

the cuban government likes it better when you go in a group because you stay at a hotel they get more money out of you the group shows you the things that the cuban government wants you to see you eat it government restaurants so it's really insane time to think that this change of policy is beneficial or is going to hurt. the cuban government be good for the cuban people it's actually very bad for the cuban people so trump not only lied to us about what he was doing but he shot himself in the foot i mean it's not even accomplishing the goals that he's stated well the joke in cuba right now is the term has really acute secret cuban agent because what he did is favoring the cuban government why would you cut off the ability for individuals to go to cuba and share their experiences and world view with cuban people and force you to go through a group that has to be basically sanctioned by the cuban government that's amazing sixty four percent of republicans sixty five percent of democrats fully support president obama's reparation mall with cuba so who is trump doing this for its. malk y

so because of that, our concern levels are really not very high because we never talk about it. so that's the most important thing we can do is talk about it. - yeah. you spend how much time? you're a professor at texas tech, you run the atmospheric science center, you have actually a number of responsibilities under the umbrella of your academic life that keep you certainly very busy, but you're also spending a lot of time, increasing amounts of time, out on the road. how much time are you spending out talking about it as you say? - i added up, i think i gave about 55 talks last year, but i try to do as many of those talks as i can via video. zero carbon and you can do a lot more. - oh my god, you're just on this constantly, aren't you? (laughing) - i have to be, yes. - well, i appreciate you modeling best practices for the rest of us. katharine hayhoe, thank you for everything you're doing. it's a pleasure to hear from you and good luck in all your work. - thank you for having me. - [evan] very good, thank you, good. (applauding) - [narrator] we'd love to have you join us at t

start with stuff nobody disagrees it is good, happening not because you have a designer, not becauseappening because people in community are spontaneously working together to serve one another. those are stories actually think move people and don't distract people. >> thank you. [applause] john: thank you, brian. thank you, students. coming up, you people here are obviously brilliant because you get it. you're here because you understand the benefits of individual liberties. so, how did they get it? we learn that, when we come back. [applause]at angie's list, we be there are certain things you can count on, like what goes down doesn't always come back up. ♪ [ toilet flushes ] ♪ so when you need a plumber, you can count on us to help you find the right person for the job. discover all the ways we can help at angie's list. because your home is where our heart is. [ applause ] . john: 1500 students from around the world gather here to debate what makes for a free society? but i got to wonder why are you all here? it's a weekend. you're giving up party time. why do you care? did your par

coming in because it was such a ridiculous attack. once they realized their mistake, they cut them to pieces and custer had to help rectify things. flicking --d we have to think about this. he is a cultural figure. book, it talks about the impact of all of this death on americans and the troops as well. not is an era that does kill off the sentimental idea in america, but it challenges it. you can see writers who are more realistic, even cynical such as ambrose bierce and those who did not take part in the fighting such as mark twain. they come out of the civil war with a much darker view of the world. custer represented it to americans that he is keeping the flame alive for heroism, for individual heroics. this image that he consciously creates, yes there is vanity involved. absolutely. he becomes a household name around the time of gettysburg because he is both successful and he represents something americans felt slipping away at the time. they write about him in these terms. the press loved tim, not just because he was good press.

because the japanese changed the j and 25 code after that. but until then, they had the japanese advance information that they had been able to figure out from the codes and the trick with midway saying it was running low on water. so you have to figure the coding advantage's a huge force multiplier in the american advantage. the japanese are coming in thinking they have surprise achieved. in fact, they're convinced of it as i go on, you will see. the conviction gets to a point where it almost pathologically gets in the way of their chances of winning. these are the two main adversaries at midway as far as ones in total overall control. yamamoto is actually at the battlefield in one of the trailing squadrons on the super battleship yamato and you may have heard of. recently, microsoft paul allen stuff found the sister ship of the yamato. he is on yamato as a flagship. 300 miles astern of the nagumo force. so he is on the scene. admiral nimitz, on the other hand, had -- had a calm and logistical, logical manner and realized that he can direct

he loved it like this, because it gave him a rear -- real feeling of independence.he fear of fire came from an early point in his life. when he was a little boy, he and his mother had gone to the family estate, his mother's family estate, for a party. while he was there, his on, laura, -- aunt, laura, was getting ready for the party. she knocked over a heating iron. it caught on fire. the flames spread to her clothing, and she ran out of the house. she died as a result of the fire on her close. -- clothes. and she remember -- and he remembered that growing up. the was also a small fire in the dining room area at this house when he was a young boy that he and his father helped to put out, but it was something that remained throughout his life that there was going to be an awful fire here. he was very close to his mother and father, but his father died when franklin was only 18 years old. so, his mother became the main person in his life. eleanor and sarah roosevelt had an interesting relationship over time. when she and fdr were first married, eleanor looked at sarah

i quote this because not a combination of both. happily this decision infuriated a legal scholar kimberley crenshaw and as it did several others including patricia williams who soon weighed in. and crenshaw's critique she created the term intersectionality which has now become a term i have studied recently. so i know it's not only an academic term. it's being used all over. it points to an understanding of social identity in which different categories are not only additive but transformative. that is a black woman's identity is not simply the sum of blackness and womanness. a really remarkable range of movements from black lives matter to $15 an hour has used the concept productively. but it offers them to interrogate the social categories they imply and understand them as dynamic and interactive. one of the things i've concluded from all of this, at least from my experience is that when lawyers want to use historians and the knowledge we provide, they need to instruct us. in fact i wondered if it might not be a good idea for all

i had a great time because of the travel i started. generally the most excitg time in my life was getting justice that was still without legs and arms the family trying to bring them up. can you imagine this bringing up a child without any legs or arms. >> rose: how was the newspaper tradition and does it still exist, different in london than say the united states. >> there's a major difference between the two. british journalism and many critics. in british journalism the news is totally separate. american journalism the news is there and an opinion. in the "new york times" a great newspaper you have an opinion edited by somebody. >> rose: and they report to the publisher. >> and report to the publisher. in england, the editor is responsible both for the opinion and the editorial columns and for the news coverage. so when i want to run a campaign i was writing editorials and i was also editing the news copy that was being delivered by the news department. we fused the two. there's a big argument whether you can have church and state a

because they want more reasons to not be down to. generate the blocks or they could knock them down and often i'm not so sure that was totally an accident i'm not even going to lie i'm not going to lie to you could you cause me that i'm not going to lie the whole situation that's going on in this area and we got a big one on the way that they don't want us here and it was those rich man's books they don't want us here and they put those richmond's blocks over there that's from someone who lives near the grenfell tower in north kensington where half of all children live in poverty poverty being a bigger killer than any and for so with class war now firmly on britain's political agenda we're joined now by dr lisa mackenzie research fellow at the london school of economics she's the author of getting by states class and culture in austerity britain thanks so much of going back home serviceable like you were asking me what your reaction to the resumes supporters very clearly according to the london british media report saying they don't

and putin is right now in a position because -- to rule because there's no organize od opposition to him and he's making sure of that. but a few weeks ago throeded into streets of moscow to protest corruption. still online bloggers are still protesting government actions and so there's something slightly alive underneath. and another thing is that the russian people are different than they were in the soviet union. the 25 years since soviet union has met and when i first went with to moscow as a graduate student in 1979 russians looked at their feet and they never looked at you. now, they travel, they send their kids to, you know, to study abroad. they spoil their even middle class spoil their children at toys are us and buy furniture at ikea and putin is not their guy. somewhere along here, someone might emerge to be focal point without constituency but before we get too carried away with a new liberal russia, the other potential opposition to putin could come from even harder right. because there's an even more ultranationalist, ultra orthodox -- kind of side that even putin tries

>> because -- >> work here for a long time, so like she is getting -- because she was working for a longime pretty much. >> what is that? >> because she keeps us safe when she crosses us. >> yes, she pretty cool. >> you could be anywhere in this stage of your life and you get up early to do this every day. why? i look at these kids, i know why. >> the kids, ya, and i know the kids love me. oh, my god. this is just so overwhelming. i mean -- >> i'm going to help you out, girlfriends. you're gorgeous. tell me what you love about miss liz? >> she goes to work with a smile. >> you go to work with a smile. >> and it is funny because we're kinds of holding up traffic here. and you're the crossing guards. >> yes, right, right. >> thank you so much. >> wonderful. oh, god. thank you. thank you. (applause) (cheers). >> do you want to nominate someone like liz go to our website fox29.com. again, thank you for going there. >> that's okay. oh, my god. >> i love her. >> i love liz. >> jen, that's the best one we've ever done. it just vaulted to my number one. >> so sweet. she loves the kids and they l

because of the political pressure he feels here at home he's got to show he's not a patsies not putin's puppet so i think that all goes into his calculations you think it'll go well next month i really don't know there were there have been reports or fights within the administration about should it be a subject of beauty or just a side bar handshake or something like that and that mr trump wanted to have a substantive b.d. i think they will get one and i hope they will especially with the developments in mosul in iraq we are looking at some kind of end game here with regard to isis held territory we need to figure out where we're going here and not have a conflict brewing love each other or hate each other there's got to be some sort of cooperation in syria at this point right i agree thank you so much jim jatra former u.s. diplomat thank you. all right that is the news tonight i am an elegy and sitting in for ed schultz at will be back next week follow me on twitter at manila chan it will be you that i'm going to. i'm going to do just that and you're watching solitary. slashing. i'm go

so i'm guessing that maybe they were the victims because they were desperate. saw so many of them crying, screaming, trying to get police and ambulance around. so i'm guessing that if someone run over people in the corner, maybe they were there. >> so the people that you saw crying and trying to get police attention, they appeared to be muslim because they were wearing muslim gash or h muslim garb or how could you tell? >> yes, they were all wearing the white muslim -- i don't know the name of that, but yes. >> so -- >> there were different kind of people in there but mostly them. and because i'm so used to eing them there every day, i just assum that maybe there's someuslims between the victims i saw on the floor. >> our lee joins us now reporting from the scene of the collision. ian, it is minutes after 6:00 in the morning, very early, but still people will start waking up to this. are you getting reaction from people finding out about the news? are you seeing that or not? >> reporter: right after this incident, this attack or what sadiq khan is calling a ter

truthfully, we all go into this because we want to achieve something, not because we want to hold office. >> over in the senate, people who are not up for reelection can kick back and not take ownership for trying to fix obamacare. >> and hollow out that bill. >> i am just curious, were you at that meeting and what was the temperature in the room? >> it has been extremely aggressive and good at reaching years. i met president obama twice, both times in a receiving line. he is doing away a better job than the prior administration. >> democrat chuck schumer has asked president trump to testif testify, interactions with fired fbi director james call me. >> i think we could work out a way that it could be dignified in public, the questions. we have to consult prosecutor mueller before doing it. >> president trump said he would be willing to testify after basically accusing comey of perjury. he demanded a pledge of loyalty from comey. >> did he ask for a pledge of loyalty from you? >> no he did not. >> he said these things under oath. >> who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath? >>

i worry, not just because there are partisan differences but because were living in an abnormal timeshen we look at the way that this white house is behaving about some of the biggest challenges we face, the dishonesty, the fabrication and whether you call it big news or live, pick your choice. it's deeply troubling. it's also worrisome that it could cause lasting damage to our institutions. part of what i'm writing is, okay, i'm going to talk about how it felt with what i think was in my control and what we could have done better and wish we had. but i will also talk about what happened that was totally unprecedented in american history and what are we going to do about it, what how do we think about the future and our responsibilities, whatever political party or philosophy you have, you can't be all right with the idea that a foreign adversary was trying to influence the outcome of our election. that, to me, is a big challenge that we will face as a country. i talk about that and try to explain what happened and what that means for us, to try to arm citizens, to give people a simpl

was going to --. >> a totally gave us leverage because no one knew what to expect and because of that they were very attentive. with a new was we were watching and we were changing things in that wanted to know how was going to affect them. in some ways they were focused on budget but if you talk about syria and the chemical weapons usage by a sob back the idea that we said you can't do this and the president followed up with strikes really showed them we are moving things in the comments that i got from ambassadors all different areas set it so good to see the u.s. again. >> someone asked the question why should we be contributing all this money to this forum where oftentimes small nations with an agenda can basically block action or major issues cannot be addressed because one or two permanent members who decide to use their veto authority. how would you in the most concise way explain to people what the value is at the u.n. and what an effective u.n. looks like in the 21st century and what can we do to move in the right direction? >> there is definitely around it and there is that

it was astounding to me because i consider myself a woman of faith.he way i built my faith is by reading the word. this is something that she did not have the luxury to do. yet her faith rivaled that of some of the most learned theologians in the universe. to the birth of faith and how that thing is fostered in a way that many of us can't access. i think that is also articulated in nola, who knows a thing but does not know why he knows a thing. she asks a certain number of questions to him sort of probing him to connect with things that he knows and to even look beyond that. episodeks about it in 206, talking about freedom as it relates to your faith, and true freedom being the ability to know a thing, but to look past every single thing that you know and still believe in something better. i think it speaks to that in terms of the loving relationship. just for relationship with rosalie and taking her under her wing and trying to guide her and let her know the guiding force initially was family but it then becomes a purpose they were than yourself, a p

but if you're going to make money using stocks because you just can't get much of a return anywhere else these days, that's pretty much the case, you're going to have to work harder with your money to do so and that requires discipline discipline because once you start buying and selling stocks, you can make more mistakes than if you just do nothing with your money. but if you do nothing with your money, you'll have a whole lot of nothing to show for it. that's why we're doing a show tonight how to trade and invest response my to make your money work for you how to tend it and make it grow. how to keep it growing from what we call active money management, it's not a sin, and a lot of you practice it. i want you to do it right. before we dig into the ways to make your money grow by being hands on about it, i want to delve into a little psychology of stock ownership one question i'm asked repeatedly when people ask me on the street, i go back and forth from the street and wall street and "squawk on the street," people ask me, don't you worry about your stocks? it is true that i don't own a

because it was so small in the film.t's more than an hour-and-a-half, which is how long the film was. so they built up the characters within the family and you learned so much more about the dynamics between the parents, themselves, and the kids. and it's really -- it's really interesting. that's what made me want to do it. and the thing that's exciting is you find out what happened to baby and johnny after the summer ends. >> seth: wow. [ audience ohs ] >> in this version. that's right. >> seth: i'm guessing crime spree. [ laughter ] they go on a dancing crime spree. i can't wait to see that. i mean was that close? was i close? >> you were very close. watch, it was announced this week, very exciting, "will and grace" is coming back. [ cheers and applause ] and -- >> what's that? >> seth: i know. we were talking back stage because there's now a trailer with a little clip and it was, watching it was great to realize how quickly as a viewer, how comfortable i felt seeing you guys all play those characters again. was it fun

they're because. i've accepted it because i don't have faith in the the methods that are used by physicists and i trust although i personally not qualified to understand more physics i am qualified as a scientist and the methods are in place to make sure absolutely but politics is not precise. it's list strong in the case politics but. but in the case of just simply complicated affair. to make a vote when you have not looked at it at all the people who are involved in parliament the people involved in negotiation the people in brussels these are people who know a lot about what goes on so i don't regard it as an argument from authority i regard it as an argument from people who have spent time and effort. to understanding to working on the details but who may also have trusted. interest in continuing on but we. the system is imperfect but the system of representative democracy system of civil servants who are paid to look at the details in great detail i have more faith in that than i have in the pers

because there is a lot of smoke. when you were talking about meeting prior to at trump tower, he was president-elect. >> let me make the distinction. >> you cannot qualify that. >> do you see what i'm saying? >> no, i don't see what you're saying. what you have to understand is -- >> you yourself said this might be -- >> one at a time. listen. >> this is why comey probably came to set the parameters. and i talked to axelrod prior to and i was asking him, look, when you came into the white house, did you not get the protocol understanding about what happens, what you can and cannot do? there is a lot of stuff that's awry. he was president-elect at that time. you cannot hold him to that standard for this. >> i'm not holding him to that standard. comey made that distinction, trump did not. you said there is a chance they didn't know what they were doing. >> director comey made a point he only spoke alone with president obama your former boss twice in person, never on the phone. he recalled nine one-on-one conversations

he did that because he did not trust mrtrump to he did that because he did not trust mr trump to tell the truth. he said that he thought trump would lie about the meetings. when it comes to his details with president trump he says his colleagues were also not happy with the way things were going. and when it came to the russian investigation and why he was fired, james comey told the panel that he believed that he was fired because of the way that he was conducting the russian investigation. so there's a lot perhaps for democrats to mull over but republicans too because james comey admitted he had leaked his memos to the press, especially the one where he talked to the president in the oval office about the national security adviser, the fire adviser, michael flynn. that conversation where president trump is alleged to have turned to him and asked whether there was a way of letting the investigation go, the republicans will pounce on that and say that james comey is one of these people who is linking information. it was partisan in the way he talked about the clinton campaign —— who i

because i, you know, in perm, minnesota, a woman was crying because she said my mom will lose her home health care. and my husband and i both work. and i don't know what we're going to do with my mom. >> do you believe that we're looking towards 2018 election which democrats could take over both the house and the senate? >> is it heading that way. >> you know, i'm not a prognosticator. so i'm not going to go down that-- that is not a pivot. that's just-- a prepared answer. >> rose: that is an he vas vaisive. >> i don't like to do that. i like to focus on what is in front of us right now. and what's in front of us right now is this terrible health-care bill that the president had the ceremony and the rose garden which you don't do after-- . >> rose: it is not a mission accomplished time. >> no. and the president is saying you know, you know, everyone, no one knew the health care was complicated. until i figured out that it's complicated. you know, that's crazy. and we all know it's complicated. it's very complicated. and sometimes i feel that my republican colleagues just had the afford

partially doing well because of this and because of their earnings.al with nike, what does that say for dick's sporting goods, retailers where you go to their website to buy sneakers, now directly go to amazon. bottom line look at both of those industries. there have been other examples, walmart tell you about this, amazon comes in and industry which they enter is never the same. i don't know if breadsticks or restaurants are that industry. i'm so close i could cut out the middleman, pete and i could be in studio seven or eight minutes if you're interested. neil: well, go, go. let me ask you, what is to stop me from just calling olive garden having them delivered themselves? depends if they do, no? reporter: well, that was amateur by move, eating breadstick knowing, should have known you would have a follow-up question. neil: i wasn't planning on it i saw you eating. >> they have to have $500 plus. has to be a large catering order to do it. they do it third party. now i think you can order like i did, half a dozen breadsticks, amazon guy would have it

speech because there are no other takers. to claim that mainstream media has met its maker. earlier today president obama no no no no i don't think that a responsible choice new people and there is always well that's what good sean is because it always expensive things are going to be here's something else do you know you've been you will see that you're pointing to shows and doesn't trump has used social media while israel is our lead story because it's garbage in real. welcome back to politicking i'm joined by peter kaufman and betsy mccoy in studio let me just actually very simple question what is in the senate republican bill doesn't come you know yes let me point out the senate republican bill provides a reform of medicaid to slow future in the roman medicaid it does not repelled kero way from twenty others claim in fact the bill includes a grandfather clause that protects anyone currently enrolled in medicaid no one will be quote thrown off medicaid as bernie sanders who was apparently let me ask you this little bit about process senate well the republican party critic

the 1950's have a reputation for being conservative because there was a great baby boom, because it was a great period of family formation in the united states. that is what popular images of -- this is why popular images of the 1950's are very domestic. you have the father knows best sitcom image of the 1950's. a return to normal, bourgeois family life, americans making up for disruption of the great depression and world war ii. you have this great domestic explosion. one that was limited to the united states. this did not happen in western europe or japan after world war ii. it was a peculiarly american thing. a little bit in australia and new zealand, apparently. but principally american. most historians try to explain why this happened in the u.s. and not other places, was a higher degree of religious observance. americans were more religious than western europeans. the appeal of a continued judeo-christian culture was more in evidence in the u.s. the more religious you are, the more family-oriented you are. there is a clear correlation to religious observance and family size. part

or forced to come here because they were sued and. if they were located refugees maybe they were saying you were supportive of the locative refugee you know it's an interesting conundrum that the world is that i mean fifty five percent of refugees in this world are now coming from the syria and afghanistan places the united states is actively performing the lethal military actions and that's a that's a staggering number when you see how you know we're turning our back on refugees or you know claiming that we're going to war you know you look at the amount of weapons and the amount of armaments and where we've dropped bombs were a lot of refugees are coming because it's not about humanitarian efforts i'm really tired out so i just have to weigh. in this is not a setting tomahawk missiles into syria and dropping bombs and putting drones everywhere and shooting down planes it's not about humanitarian reasons it's not you that's just that is a bold faced lie and that's you know that's what the interesting thing of these stories is that so

. >> demoralized not because they thought they were going to win this race but because they thought they were going to and it sent shock waves through the political system. >> rose: we talk to christopher hill and david sanger about north korea. >> views itself to be unlucky enough to be sitting in office at the very moment that the north koreans are about to go merge two technologies they've been working on for many years. >> rose: we continue with salma hey yak and john lithgow. >> we're both very however gripping to see characters from two completely different and almost opposite worlds engaged. you don't see that in movies. you don't see it in plays or in real life. >> rose: we conclude with don auerbach waiting on a song. >> it's that creative process i'm so addicted to and that's the beautiful thing about it. >> rose: georgia election, north korea, salma hayek and john lithgow and dan auerbach. all of that when we continue. >> and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and information services worldwide. captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york

because of the underperformance. after trump's election, we saw the financials scream to the upside since that time, pretty much have been sort of dead money. just sort of sitting there we've seen paper time and time again, scott, in the xlf, in bank of america, in citi, in goldman sachs, and morgan stanley. they've moved a little here and there, but generally they've pulled back and we've been in a fairly tight range ever since. i think technology and financials do outperform i think the energy call is the folks out there that are going to the contrarian side, trying to bottom pick and i think they might find themselves with exactly what they're going to get, oftentimes, which isn't what they think when they're trying to bottom -- >> one firm is trying to pick a bottom in energy we're going to hit that later, as well, and debate that but what about these sectors financials going to lead >> i think financials benefit the most from deregulation and that's the easiest thing in the trump agenda to get done, which he's b

the concern would be, obviously, because if that boomerang comes back, it will be a very big deal because it will be a duty to correct. >> we saw that in the clinton email investigation, of course. >> yes, i recall that. i know you do. so let me ask you, finally, in the minute that we have left, there was this conversation back and forth about loyalty, and i think we all appreciate the fact an f.b.i. director is a unique public official in the sense that he's a political appointee in one sense, but he has a duty of independence to pursue the law pursuant to the constitutional laws of the united states, and, so, when the president asked you about loyalty, you got into this back and forth about, well, i'll pledge you my honesty, and then, it looks like, from what i've read, you agreed upon honest loyalty or something like that. is that the characterization? >> yes. thank you very much. , sir. senator. thank you. there have been press reports that the president in addition to asking you to drop the flynn investigation and has asked other senior intelligence officials to take steps which woul

and i say help because i did nothing alone at the fbi. there are no indispensable people at the fbi. the organization's great strength is that its values and abilities run deep and wide. fbi will be fine without me. mission will be relentlessly pursued by its people, and that mission is to protect the american people and uphold the constitution of the united states. -- i will deeply miss being part of that, but this mission will go on long beyond me and any particular administration. sage before i close. i want the american people to know this truth. strong, andonest, the fbi is and always will be independent. now, to my former colleagues if i may. i'm so sorry that i didn't get the chance to say goodbye to you properly. it was the honor of my life to service ideal, to be part of the fbi family, and i will miss it for the rest of my life. thank you for standing watch, thank you for doing so much good for this country. do that good as long as ever you can. >> that was about 10 a.m. this morning. your phone calls. i want to show you this fr

because the real reason you forget is because you're not paying attention, like reaching to the fridge to get something. >> for sure. >> then i feel like sometimes men are good with doing that, making word association with people's names. >> totally. >> and women, i just feel like names go in and out of my head. so maybe placing broad sweeping brush. >> give me an example after poem? like if you lost your keys? >> i say saint anthony poem. it is prayer poem. >> right? >> dear saint anthony please come around, something lost and can't be found. >> and does it work? >> it works. >> yes, saint anthony. >> uh-huh. >> i think also, like, if you have keys, keys, next to my knees, i need them, you know, help me finds them please. >> please. >> it is crazy that that would help. >> i mean, if i've lost something, like i'll try anything, so i'm too long try it. >> all right, make a poem, you've lost your javelin. >> really? >> i can't have-alynn my jim donovan-lynn, put it by the umbrella stands. >> and then went to my son mack-lands. >> that's right. >> i was trying to help. i get the point. >>