more over, our closest allies in europe or asia, much less china or russia, certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five, ten, 15 years, according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power, and it certainly wasn't based for a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions, are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position as some have suggested, congress's rejection would almost certainly result in multi-lateral sanctions unravelling. if as has also been suggested, we try to maintain unilateral sanctions, beefen them up, we would be standing alone. we cannot dictate the foreign economic and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world's largest banks. we would have to cut off count

against america or china or russia. anchor: let's get some expert analysis on this. i guess previously established the brussels office and served as his executive director. tell us what do you think the most significant challenge is to the eu is right now? >> i think it is a orton they are not so laser focused on -- i think it is important they are not so laser focused on greece, and what we're seeing right now is the crisis in greece is not only a financial crisis that is telling us we have a major issue with democracy and europe. the crisis in greece is telling us we have a crisis of democracy in the european union as a whole. as the americans are saying, the crisis is a terrible thing to waste. for the project of the european union, that means we are focusing on holding the political union finally that we have put on the back earners. anchor: what exactly does that mean going forward? guest: it means to give the citizens more rights to be engaged in european democracy. we have taken baby steps through parliament elections but at the end of the day, the citizens of

more over, our closest allies in europe or asia, much less china or russia, certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five, ten, 15 years, according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful

against america or china or russia. anchor: let's get some expert analysis on this. i guess previously established the brussels office and served as his executive director. tell us what do you think the most significant challenge is to the eu is right now? >> i think it is a orton they are not so laser focused on -- i think it is important they are not so laser focused on greece, and what we're seeing right now is the crisis in greece is not only a financial crisis that is telling us we have a major issue with democracy and europe. the crisis in greece is telling us we have a crisis of democracy in the european union as a whole. as the americans are saying, the crisis is a terrible thing to waste. for the project of the european union, that means we are focusing on holding the political union finally that we have put on the back earners. anchor: what exactly does that mean going forward? guest: it means to give the citizens more rights to be engaged in european democracy. we have taken baby steps through parliament elections but at the end of the day, the citizens of

i caution organizations when they say china or russia or pick a country. i cannot send traffic to any country in the world. oh lots of hackers know that china is in the forefront of us discussion but and tell the for the six continue what is the native language of the hackers? what tools techniques with those fingerprint match bids. to know that it was just right now. deirdre: will receive more of these attacks? >> absolutely. one every organization id needs to realize if you are connected to the internet with one piece of data that is of value. they will find a way to monetize or a way to have somebody else. this will continue until we take matters into their own hands. these kids not just after you trust godfrey credit reporting but freeze their credit from the university standpoint to be open-minded and trusting whether from vendors with access controls to lock up the data to take a lesson from today with critical questions and who might be after it? to make the engineers will help you to discover that i guess they will start to tap the in court -- in ho

build american products, do not roll over for china or russia or -- by the way, not take their oil. >he oil they have taken. i stand corrected. and if it requires ground troops, so much the better to achieve our purposes. we don't want american lives lost, but we don't want a hedge. lou: people can quote trump and get the impression, but most americans don't realize that we lost 4500 lives in iraq, our troops, and with thousands grievously wounded, and we cleared the oil fields and endstepped russia and iran to create new contracts for oil production. this is the kind of stupidity he's talking about when it comes to the national interests. i have to say i think most people are -- sure, he's being perhaps direct, blunt and succinct to the point that some people think he's inartful, but the reality is he's far clearer than competitors. >> agree 100%. >> the issues are tangible for people, they want to feel they're being heard and taken care of and they're seeing that in donald trump. so it will be very interesting to watch how the other candidates continue with him in the race. we saw s

paul: who is the bigger threat, china or russia? gov. christie: russia is a bigger threat because their economy is in such bad shape. i don't see any reason at the moment why oil prices will go up. as a result there it economy will continue to be in bad shape. when countries are in bad shape economically, they act out around the world and keep their folks at home -- so over the next 10 years, russia is a greater threat. four years ago, mitt romney said in a debate with the president that russia was a great threat to us, and the president knocked him and said the 19 70's are calling and asking for their foreign policy back. it is a cute line. it is instructive to note that mitt romney was right about that and we should have listened to him and on a lot of other issues as well. paul: on the related topic, a question here, why does the united states not provide defensive weapons to pro-western democratic countries like ukraine, who are attacked by external forces coming from russia? gov. christie: i think we should be arming more folks arou

e-mail system -- joint staff e-mail system, it bore hallmark of a state actor that leaves either china or russia, the attack occurred july 25, the joint staff e-mail system has been off line ever since. nearly 4,000 dod employees were affect by the attack this is not first time this year, russia has been implicated in a pentagon hack. in april, stanford university, defense secretary ash carter blamed russia for a separate department of defense cyber breach. >> let's also, go on to this report have you about a iranian general who broke sanctions traveled to moscow. >> reporter: well, fox news has learned that the shadows iranian force commander, visited moscow to meet with russia defense minister, and president putin, despite a travel ban and u.n. security council resolutions barring him from leaving iran. intelligent courses report friday july 24, 2015, one week before secretary of say the john kerry testified about the iran nuclear deal to the armed service committee general sulemany arrived in moscow for three days of leader, it is not clear what they discussed this is as u.n. and e.u. arms em

it was so sophisticated there's really only two entities that could pull it off -- china or russia.ng to drain data out of a system as they did with the office of personnel management when they launched a massive attack there. that's not the russian style. they go for more malicious activity. that is why tonight the pentagon thinking the leading theory is not only was it the russians but the russians were specifically targeting is the joint staff. and that includes general dempsey, an unclassified system but very serious. >> bauer ra star, thank you very much. >> the hunt for and confirmation of debris from ma lashs airlines flight 370, which dad more than 500 days. france has a -- in the search for plain debris off the coast where that piece of wing was sfa discovered. some experts are saying not so fast there's no concrete evidence this debring is from. sunlenser fatty. >> serfaty. >> each cushion has a seer jails number and they could potential look at all these clues and match that but all of this is. >> items that could have been in the ocean for over a year. >> today reports o

moreover, our closest allies in europe or in asia, much less china or russia, certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another 5, 10, 15 years, according to the dictates of the u.s. congress, because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that they cannot have peaceful nuclear power. it certainly wasn't based on a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthen our position, as some have suggested, congress's rejection would almost surely result in multilateral sanctions unraveling. if, as has also been suggested we try to maintain unilateral sanctions, beef and them up, we would be standing alone. we cannot dictate the foreign, economic, and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world upon start as banks. we would have to cut off countries like

moreover, our closest allies in europe, or in asia, much less china or russia, certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five, 10, 15 years according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power. and it certainly wasn't based on a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position as some have suggested, congress's rejection would almost certainly result in multilateral sanctions unraveling. if, as has also been suggested, we tried to maintain unilateral sanctions, beefen them up, we would be standing alone. we cannot dictate the foreign, economic, and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world's largest banks. we'd have to cut off countri

moreover, our closest allies in europe or in asia much less china or russia, certainly not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five, 10, 15 years, according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. of the u.s. congress. their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. not on the belief iran can't have peaceful nuclear power. and certainly not based on a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position as some have suggested, congress' rejection would result in multi lateral sanctions unraveling. if, as has been suggested, we try to maintain unilateral sanctions and beef them up, we would be standing alone. we cannot dictate the foreign, economic, and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction for example, some of the world's largest banks. we would have to cut off countries like china from the financial system

moreover, our closest allies in europe or asia, much less china or russia certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another 5, 10, 15 years according to the big tates of the u.s. congress. their willingness to support sanctions in the first endingas based on iran its pursuit of nuclear weapons, not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power. it certainly was not based on a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position, some have suggested, rejection would result in sanctions unraveling. if, as has also been suggested, we try to maintain unilateral , wetions, beef and them up would be standing alone. the foreignctate economic and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world's largest banks. we would have to cut off countries like china from the american financial system. since they happen to be major purchaser

companies to reach out and keep students who are here from india, china or russia, wherever, there are 3 to 4 million jobs that go unfilled every month in the u.s. because there is a dearth of either math or engineering or science skills. maybe that's where we start is more with education? >> the fact of the matter is, if google, the best people are in the united states, i guarantee you google, yahoo! apple and all those companies want them. they will do a job fair, they don't care what those people look like, what they sound like, they'll translate for them. they'll do whatever it takes to get the best employees, and if there's 3 million h1-b 1's contrary to what obama or jesse jackson or the race pimps tell you. they'll hire them and they're waiting because they're the best employees. that's the problem. the education system in america is not producing the best employees anymore. instead, what we're doing is coddling people. we're saying use the eeoc guidelines and all this other nonsense that doesn't further business, use the guidelines to get people hired but don't hire the best. t

moreover, our closest allies in europe or in asia much less china or russia certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five, ten, 15 years according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power. and it certainly wasn't based on a desire for regime change in iran. as a result, those who say we can just walk away there from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position, as some have suggested, congress's rejection would almost certainly result in multilateral sanctions unraveling. if, as has also been suggested, we try to maintain unilateral sanctions, beefen them up, we would be standing alone. we can not dictate the foreign, economic, and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world's largest banks. we'd have to cut off cou

moreover, our closest allies in europe or in asia much less china or russia certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another five ten, 15 years according to the dictates of the u.s. congress. because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. it was not based on the belief that iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power. and it certainly wasn't based on a desire for a regime change in iran. as a result those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. instead of strengthening our position as some have suggested, congress' rejection would almost certainly result in multi lateral sanctions unraveling. if, as has also been suggested, we try to maintain unilateral sanctions, beefen them up we would be standing alone. we cannot dictate the foreign economic and energy policies of every major power in the world. in order to even try to do that we would have to sanction for example, some of the world's largest banks. we'd have to cut off countries like c

i would say either china or russia. mr. heath: how would you lessen college that for millions of americans? mr. paul: i would make it presentable. i would say your interest and principal of the infected over your entire career. college is a working expense, so i would let you deduct it as a working expense throughout your entire working career. this makes more sense than what the president says, it's going to be free. there is no free lunch. timing is work and making it deductible is a good idea. mr. heath: an american center found be fighting with isis -- should an american citizen found be fighting with isis have their citizenship revoked? mr. paul: you have no rights when you are in the battlefield. i have filibustered over 13 have to say noncombatants do have rights and should be killed without due process, but those who are friday against america -- this is important to note that american citizen here do get due process. we get the bill of rights and the danger we have when we have people like japanese-americans and in

that leaves china or russia. the attack was on july 25th. the entire email system has been off-line ever since. nearly 4,000 dod employees were affected by the cyberattack. this is the not first time this year russia has been implicated in a cyberattack n april, secretary ash carter blamed russia for separate department of defense cyber breach into unclassified defense computer network earlier in the year, david. david: jennifer you have exclusive details on an incredible story. iranian general defying travel ban to go to moscow. tell us about that. >> reporter: absolutely. fox news learned exclusive i that the iranian quds force commander who we heard so much talk about in the iranian nuclear deal he wept to moscow to meet with rush's defense minister and vladmir putin and despite travel ban and u.n. security council resolutions barring him from leaving iran. july 24th, 2015, one week before secretary of state john kerry testified about the iran deal to the armed services committees, general sulimani arrived in moscow for two days of meeting

i think we, and for example, china or russia, have common interests in avoiding that kind of warfare. it is just not good for either of us, ultimately. moreve us a slightly technical example, i do not think it serves either china or us to probe each other's nuclear command and control networks with our espionage tools. why is that? --recognize we have system systems that have gone under the destroyedtually structures, med. ability toly has the strike first and we threaten destroying their missiles, they need to launch. if they know they have the ability to survive an attack -- even if we attack first, the situation will be more stable and they will be less likely to attacking a hair trigger weight. onthe whole system depends cyber systems and the system is inherently insecure and we are out there probing them and they are out there probing us, and the same tools that can be used for the espionage can be used for offense, i have now introduced insecurity in the world. i have worked -- moved from a world of mad to a world of mud, unsure destruction. it is less stable. we can find our wa

i would say either china or russia. mr. heath: how would you lessen college that for millions of americans? mr. paul: i would make it presentable. i would say your interest and principal of the infected over your entire career. college is a working expense, so i would let you deduct it as a working expense throughout your entire working career. this makes more sense than what the president says, it's going to be free. there is no free lunch. timing is work and making it deductible is a good idea. mr. heath: an american center found be fighting with isis -- should an american citizen found be fighting with isis have their citizenship revoked? mr. paul: you have no rights when you are in the battlefield. i have filibustered over 13 have to say noncombatants do have rights and should be killed without due process, but those who are friday against america -- this is important to note that american citizen here do get due process. we get the bill of rights and the danger we have when we have people like japanese-americans and in

rarely does people consider how we would feel or react if china, russia, or a run built a base somewhere near our borders today. for most in the united states the idea with even the nicest foreign troops arriving with their planes and hideah-powered weaponry, is basically an thinkable. the idea that the united states needs to maintain very large numbers of troops, very large lanue ea mbers of bases outside the united states is basically been the unquestioned status quo,. i'm happy to say hhemever there are growing numbers of people across the political spectrum, from rideaht ridears o to left d everywhere in between, who are beginning to question the status quo's. one of the most obvious reasons is the cost. overseas bases are extremely expensive compared to keeping troops on bases in the united states. biased my estimate, and 2014 on an annual basis we are spending around $85 billion per year to maintain bases in troops overseas and that is a very conservative estimate. that fideaure alone is larger than tt figure alone is larger than the budget of any government agency except that the

[indiscernible] >> do you see a danger of china or russia? my stance is that iranian deal is a bad deal. i hope congress with a two thirds majority kills it. it is bad because it does not deal with the broad relationship with iran. iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. we are giving them $100 billion of fresh money to carry out their agenda and destabilize the region. they repressed their own people. for two weeks, we could of been on the side of the people that elected a different approach in iran, but we were silent and now the presidential candidates and others who had dissented in iran, are put away. why would we want to legitimize the regime that does not allow freedom in their own country? there are three americans held hostage in iran as well and yet it does not seem like that was part of the negotiation. iran is building ballistic missile capabilities to launch missiles, nuclear and otherwise. there is nothing in the agreement that deals with that. we are loosening up conventional weapon sanctions that now will

but we have kept them on far longer than either iran, russia, or china wanted them to stay on. have kept them on under article 41, chapter seven, which means they are enforceable. we have other resolutions and tools unilaterally to make sure that we are -- that where arms are concerned and where missiles are concerned, we can move forward. >> senator toomey. toomey: thank you, mr. chairman. i want to go back to the issue raised by senator corker. ms. sherman, the nuclear review act of 2015 is clear, i think, that congress is supposed to receive all the documentation, the agreement, the annexes, the related materials. it says right in the beginning, the president shall transmit to the appropriate committees and leadership the agreement as 1.fined in subsection h- it specifies that this agreement includes, and i quote the last part of this, "any additional materials related thereto including annexes, appendices, side agreements, documents, guidance, understandings, and any related agreements." i think it is clear that is meant to be all encompassing. yet we discover there is a se

officials sillier familiar with the investigation said the hackers are probably tied to a china or russiarussia is the most likely suspect. president is under more and more opposition from democrats to the iran deal. six western nations seek to curb iran's nuclear growth product. >> mark: of the north korean dictator has it decided to create his own the time that zone. this was done because it is a legacy of japanese imperialists crimes. >> annie: we're going to take a quick break. net flics might imperialists crimes. >> annie: we're going to take a quick break. net flics might have spanish options. triple c. for a limited time, you can choose up to 48 months interest-free financing on a huge selection of tempur-pedic models. or choose to save hundreds on simmons beautyrest mattress sets. you can even choose $300 in free gifts with sleep train's most popular stearns & foster mattresses. the triple choice sale ends soon at sleep train. ♪ sleep train your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪ gfounaty, yr door c gprcribaczo® g, agecnegot tter n i uldn belve itillad acne th sawas macnenot . a a

hackers breaking foo an ing in system possibly coming from russia or china. abc's martha raddatz is in washington with the latest. good morning, martha. >> reporter: good morning, lara. the u.s. is pointing the finger at china or russia. the leading suspect, russia and they're not just talking about a couple of russian hackers, they mean state sponsored hacking with the blessing of russia's secretive and aggressive president vladimir putin. think about it, the pentagon is one of the most secure facilities in the world and yet hackers were able to penetrate that system. the good news is this was the unclassified e-mail system but you're still talking about at least 2500 people on what's called the joint staff, war planners, decisionmakers, people who the russians would love to know more about. and while this attack was sophisticated, it was also dangerously simple. it was a phishing attack meaning they dummied up an e-mail or login that looked so real that a member of the joint staff could have been fooled by it, lara. >> so real looking. so what are we doing a

i would say either china or russia. jack: how would you lessen college debt for millions of americans? sen. paul: i have a plan that would make it deductible. right now there are limitations -- i would say your interests and your principle ought to be deducted over your entire working career. since college is a working and spends, i would let you adopted over your entire working career and i think this makes more sense than the president who says this will be free. he cannot offer free education. i think timing and making deductions is a good idea. jack: should american citizens found to be fighting with isis have their u.s. citizenship revoked? sen. paul: yes, and in fact, you really do not have any rights in the battlefield. you really do not have any rights and some have fought this those that are involved do not get to protest and are shot. we do get to process and -- and due process. what we did to african-americans pre-civil rights days, japanese-americans -- we have to be very careful that we not collect everyone

i would say either china or russia. jack: how would you lessen college debt for millions of americans? sen. paul: i have a plan that would make it deductible. right now there are limitations -- i would say your interests and your principle ought to be deducted over your entire working career. since college is a working and spends, i would let you adopted over your entire working career and i think this makes more sense than the president who says this will be free. he cannot offer free education. i think timing and making deductions is a good idea. jack: should american citizens found to be fighting with isis have their u.s. citizenship revoked? sen. paul: yes, and in fact, you really do not have any rights in the battlefield. you really do not have any rights and some have fought this those that are involved do not get to protest and are shot. we do get to process and -- and due process. what we did to african-americans pre-civil rights days, japanese-americans -- we have to be very careful that we not collect everyone

last a sophisticated intrusion was detected which defense officials say could only be mounted by china or russia. after two weeks of investigation, u.s. intelligence has fingered russia as the probable culprit. as defense secretary ash carter revealed, it would not be the first time russia has hacked into an unclassified pentagon network. >> after learning valuable information about their tactics we analyzed their network activity associateded with russia and quickly kicked them off the network in a way that minimized their chances of returning. >> reporter: the pentagon was not prepared for the sophistication of the latest attack which highlights an inconvenient truth about the u.s. military. often billed as the most powerful on the planet. gary maleski is ceo of soup snoopwall. >> the u.s. is not prepared for a cyberwar. we're very prepared for a traditional war. >> reporter: last year russia was blamed for intrusions into unclassified networks at the state department and white house. again, goneaining access to information not meant to be public and demonstrating the ability to disrupt some o

to trish regan's point, more about china or russia few days ago now about the federal reserve? ple are talking about or still both. >> for the past five years it has been about the federal reserve. connell: i know. >> i'm not sure you can make that comparison except now i started to look at my wall street peeps i follow, and andy brenner put forward idea of october rate hiking. everybody discounted a october rate hike. well, there is no press conference and that the fed will want to speak to people once they tighten rates. possibly unlikely. now wall street is talking about it. to be the conduit to make sure everybody is ready for what could happen. connell: we'll be watching. you're wearing green. maybe that will help out a little bit. >> we'll try. connell: list claim live from the new york stock exchange. trish regan follows us. the cavuto coast to coast program, hosted by me continues right after this. we'll be right back. ♪ can a business have a mind? a subconscious. a knack for predicting the future. reflexes faster than the speed of thought. can a business have a spirit?

[indiscernible] >> do you see a danger of china or russia? jeb bush: my stance is that iranian deal is a bad deal. i hope congress with a two thirds majority kills it. it is bad because it does not deal with the broad relationship with iran. iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. we are giving them $100 billion of fresh money to carry out their agenda and destabilize the region. they repressed their own people. for two weeks, we could of been on the side of the people that elected a different approach in iran, but we were silent and now the presidential candidates and others who had dissented in iran, are put away. why would we want to legitimize the regime that does not allow freedom in their own country? there are three americans held hostage in iran as well and yet it does not seem like that was part of the negotiation. iran is building ballistic missile capabilities to launch missiles, nuclear and otherwise. there is nothing in the agreement that deals with that. we are loosening up conventional weapon sanctions that

we have kept them on far longer than iran, china, or russia wanted them to stay on. they are enforceable. we have other un security council resolutions and other tools unilaterally to make sure where missiles are concerned that we can keep moving forward in every way we need to. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i think the witnesses for appearing today. i want to go back to the issue raised by senator corker. act ofn nuclear review 2015 is abundantly clear that congress is supposed to receive all the documentation, all of the agreement, annexes, related materials. ,he transmission of agreements the president shall transmit to the impersonal committees and leadership the agreement as defined in subsection h-one, including all materials. subsection h-one specifies that iis agreement includes -- and quote the last part of this -- any additional materials related thereto, including annexes, implemented materials, guidance, or other understandings, and any related agreements. that thatat is clear is meant to be all encompassing. there is a secret side agreement , which strikes

we have kept them on far longer than iran, china, or russia wanted them to stay on. we have kept them on under article 41, chapter seven, which means they are enforceable. we have other un security council resolutions and other tools unilaterally to make sure that where arms and missiles are concerned we can keep moving , forward in every way we need to. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i thank the witnesses for appearing today. i want to go back to the issue raised by senator corker. ambassador sherman the iran , nuclear review act of 2015 is abundantly clear that congress is supposed to receive all the documentation, all of the agreement, annexes, related materials. it says right in the beginning referring to the transmission of agreements, the president shall transmit to the impersonal -- appropriate congressional committees and leadership the agreement as defined in subsection h-one, including all related materials. subsection h-one specifies that this agreement includes -- and i quote the last part of this -- any additional materials relat

which appears to be the option chosen by the entire obama administration when it comes to china or for that matter russia the islamic state or iran, or you get the idea. we're coming right back with more useful information, stay with us. >>> we have the latest polls for you everyone wants to know. how's donald trump doing post debate? well, you will be finding out here next. stay with us. >>> and a professional cyclist racing in utah t-bones an suv. you knew it had to happen, making a verb out of a steak, and you thought that's all we wanted to show you? ♪ i built my business with passion. but i keep it growing by making every dollar count. that's why i have the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy for my studio. ♪ and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... that's huge for my bottom line. what's in your wallet? pubut to get from theand yoold way to the new,d. you'll need the right it infrastructure. from a partner who knows how to make your enterprise more agile, borderless and secure. hp he

defense officials soon realized it was so sophisticated it could only have been a work of china and or russia has learned a two week investigation has pointed a finger at russia. the attack highlighted a possible vulnerability of the u.s. military. >> the u.s. is very well not prepared for a cyber war. we're very prepared for traditional war. >> reporter: russia was blamed for sign's tax of unclassified networks used by white house and state department in the past year. mark albert for cbs-3 "eyewitness news". >>> pat gallon joins us. eagles training camp continues at novacare complex in south philadelphia. >> there are some new faces pat it seems like a lot of new faces and that is usually the case when there is a major shake up at the most important position, people take notice. it is no surprise that everyone is keeping a close eye on what sam bradford and eagles quarterbacks are doing in the early stages of the camp. chip kelly made sure everyone knew before training camp began that this is an opened quarterback competition but through first few practices we are catching glimpses were eag

industry, this birth tourism where rich wealthy people from all over the world, whether it's russia, china or whatever continent that it happiness to be, and the last month of pregnancy, and put on an exclusive condominion. >> that's not the part that's wrecking the economy. they are coming in with money. >> you talked about it. let me go back to this. back in 2013, the white house said granting a path to citizenship to 11 million undocumented workers would inceest their wages and boost g.d.p. by 1.4 prilion, and income for all americans, generating 184 billion in additional state and taxes. and add about 2 million jobs to the u.s. economy. i know you say that's the white house's numbers, if you discount that? >> you make a good point. i will say this, if we can come to an agreement recollects we republicans, former member myself, and the democratic party with a comprehensive immigration reforms, and i think we should, i'll be opposed to amnesty. i think donald trump had good inside in regard to - there were things that mike proposed, the governor of indiana. when he was a long term member of

which appears to be the option chosen by the entire obama administration when it comes to china or for that matter russia the islamic state or iran, or you get the idea. we're coming right back with more useful information, stay with us. >>> we have the latest polls for you everyone wants to know. how's donald trump doing post debate? well, you will be finding out here next. stay with us. >>> and a professional cyclist racing in utah t-bones an suv. you knew it had to happen, making a verb out of a steak, and you thought that's all we wanted to show you? no, no. that's just the beginning. stay with us. buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason? it was geoffrey! it was jason. it could've been brenda. you drop 40 grand on a new set of wheels, then... wham! a minivan t-bones you. guess what: your insurance company will only give you 37-thousand to replace it. "depreciation" they claim. "how can my car depreciate before it's first oil change?" you ask. maybe the better question is, why do you have that insurance company? with libert

the system will likely weaken as a low-pressure system and reach southeastern russia or northeastern china by thursday. so stormy weather is in the forecast for southeastern russia on both wednesday and thursday. here's your extended forecast. >>> send your comments and thoughts to us. log on to the nhk world website and click on contact us in the upper right-hand corner. we look forward to hearing from you soon. i'm james tengan. thanks for watching this edition of "newsline." more to come here on nhk world, so stay with us. to print 24. we are broadcasting live from paris. terrorism, climate change, and the world economy. these are some of the key issues that the president has addressed during a conference to fresh ambassadors -- french ambassadors. the two careers find a diplomatic solution to these military tensions. hasaul, korea

appears to be the option chosen by the entire obama administration when it comes to china or for that matter for russialamic state or iran. you get the idea. we're coming right back with more useful information. stay with us. >> up next, republican presidential candidate governor scott walker will join us. nationally he is in the top three of republican hopefuls, number two right now in iowa. how does he land to get to number one and stay there? we will talk about that and much more. >>> donald trump maintaining also his lead over the republican field in iowa after last week's debate the front runner garnering a 19% level of sore in iowa. karly fiorina surging to fourth place with 10% according to the latest ppp poll. my next guest is tied for second place in this latest poll and joining us now republican presidential candidate, the governor of wisconsin, scott walker. good to have you with us. you've got to be awfully pleased with where you are in had these polls, not only these, but a national set of polls, you are running strong. >> yeah, we are. we're less than a month in, we announced on july 13th