circuit moved that appeal as quickly as possible. more than any case double trump has ever been involved with in his life. this is the one. where donald trump wants to delay, and delay, and delay, because this is the one where donald trump faces such serious potential criminal indictments. donald trump is indicted in this case the title in this case will be the opposite of the title of the civil case. donald trump just lost. the 11th civil case, the 11th circuit effectively extinguish today's donald trump vs america. don trump becomes a criminal defendant. the time of the case will be the united states of america versus donald j trump, and donald trump will finally experience what it is like to stand in a federal courtroom accused of crimes by the full power and authority of the united states of america. there is now nothing procedurally, standing in the way of special prosecutor jack smith moving with speed to bring criminal charges in this case. all these projects will be brought. there is nothing in the way now, nothing, there are

the 11th circuit has no tolerance for that, and i will tell you as a former 11 circuit chief in my old u.s. attorney's office, before i came u.s. attorney, one thing we are known for in this target is the collegiality in which the court conducts itself. this opinion might read as very understated to people have not practiced in the circuit or to folks who are laypeople, but it reads loud and clear that anyone who's ever been in front of a panel in this court, it is a real, sound bench slap at this judge, telling her that she has done wrong, removing her discretion, and directing her to end this case now. >> yeah, i guess i have read enough opinions to know that this is a pretty insulting opinion, and properly so. glengarden, or in the next segment we are going to discuss with laurence tribe the appeals process from here. i think that we know that this circuit court has already been, that donald trump already attempted to appeal one of the rulings of spring it didn't get anywhere. that process could eat up a couple more weeks, but, for jack smith tonight, a special prosecutor in this ca

montgomery-reeves of delaware to be united states circuit judge for the third circuit. ms. hirono: mr. president? the president pro tempore: the senator from hawaii. ms. hirono: i note the absence of a quorum. the president pro tempore: the clerk will call the roll. quorum call: 12 years ago i stood on the senate floor for my maiden speech. i was new to the senate but had thought was possible to achieve for my constituents in ohio having served in the house for 12 years and connect capital level jobs in the bush of mr. geithner i talk about my interests and solving problems and working cross it out to tackle big is facing our country. that's what we've tried to do here we had some successes and some disappointments but through it all i've always considered it a great honor to have been given the chance to represent my neighbors, the people of ohio. my team and i viewed as a sacred trust to do all we could while we had this temporary privilege. our commitment was to move the ball forward wherever possible for our great country and for the families we represented. and through

montgomery-reeves to serve as circuit judge on the third circuit, an alumnus of the university of mississippi and georgia law school. judge montgomery-reeves serve as a clerk in delaware before embarking on a successful career in private practice. in 2005, she was appointed to the delaware court of chancery and then to the become being the first black wellcome to ever serve in either court. when confirmed, judge montgomery-reeves will join the proud company of so many of the biden appointees who are little by little reshaping our courts for the better. of the 95 judges we've confirmed to date, 71 are women. 75%. 65 are people of color, almost 70%. 45 are women of color, nearly 50%. and 23 are black women, nearly 25%. we've never smeen a class of new judges that brings so much -- never seen a class of new judges that brings so much diversity and dynamism in a single two-year stretch. it's not just the diversity that matters. in the last two years, the senate confirmed more civil rights lawyers, immigration lawyers than typically in this chamber. it's a big reason today why our courts are more

circuit judge for the seventh circuit. she'll be the 26th -- the 26th circuit court judge the senate confirms in the last two years. these appointments are critical, even though a conservative majority presides on the supreme court. the bulk of all federal indications are still d. cases are still resolved by circuit court judges. she will make history as the first woman of color from indiana ever to sit on the circuit. we're making sure our courts reflect the diversity of america. a graduate of the university of central arkansas and indiana school of law, judge pryor served as a clerk for both the 8th circuit court of appeals and for the eastern district of arkansas before turning to public defense. she has also more than a decade of experience as federal prosecutor, focusing on national security and prosecuting individuals who sought aid to terrorist nations. while not involved in donning black robes, she is deeply involved in the indianapolis community, founding youth programs, mentoring future lawyers, and helping the f

it's precisely what the 11th circuit says it is.ule of law that applies to everyone eke wally, no matter how witch they are, who they are, or even if they're a former president. so trump can even try to appeal this to the supreme court. i just don't think it's going to do him any good at all. >> so far, it seems like his appeals have been about delay. he shopped around for a judge who would come up with this novel theory of law that because he's a former president, he should get this special treatment that no other american would get. is it possible for him to do more of this shopping or as you said, has he kind of reached the end of the line here? as you said, if his theory is right, any president could break the law because they were president and get all this special treatment and they would be above the law. >> and that is exactly what trump always asks for. you're right, he plays the delay game. he could try to do that here, but the 11th circuit has vacated judge cannon's order. that means the justice department, i suppose now

and as has been pointed out by the 11th circuit, there are three judges on the 11th circuit. they don't really have the standing to do so for a variety of reasons, separation of powers and others. i anticipate that the president's legal team will appeal asking to be held by the entire 11th circuit which success seems pretty slim and then they'll appeal to the supreme court. it's a tactic kyiv seen before from the president's lawyers in terms of just delay. and i think that they'll continue to delay until the absolute last moment they can, and the supreme court doesn't take it up. i don't think the supreme court will take it up. but, you know, they'll take to it the 11th circuit en banc and we'll see what they say. >> carrie, how long could it slow things down? the ruling by the 11th circuit doesn't go into effect for seven days, which obviously gives the president time there. >> right. so it gives him time to appeal. and so then there will be a determination whether or not the justice department can go ahead and actually look at the information. so there is some i think a lit

douglas of louisiana to be united states circuit judge for the fifth circuit. the president pro tempore: the senator from georgia. mr. warnock: i suggest the absence of a quorum. the president pro tempore: the clerk will call the roll. quorum call: mr. schumer: mr. president? the presiding officer: the majority leader. mr. schumer: i ask unanimous consent the quorum be dispensed with. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: now, mr. president, before i begin, i want to extend a massive, massive congratulations to the syracuse orangemen's soccer team for winning the ncaa college cup championship last night in a heart-stopping 7-6 victory after penalty kicks. a big congrats to coach mcintire, all the players and staff. go orange! now, on the omni, a more serious subject, negotiations for a year year-long -- a year-long omnibus agreement go forward. there's a lot of work to do but we're opt mis-stick that if we preserve the good faith we've seen so far, we will get there. despite agreements about the ultimate package, there's little disagreement tha

i is intricate wires and computer circuit boards.- there is i circuit boards.on. i'm _ circuit boards. yeah. there is a lot going on. i'm not i circuit boards. yeah. there is a lot going on. i'm not sure l circuit boards. yeah. there isj a lot going on. i'm not sure it would give — a lot going on. i'm not sure it would give you _ a lot going on. i'm not sure it would give you more - a lot going on. i'm not sure it would give you more or i a lot going on. i'm not sure it would give you more or less i would give you more or less confidence to get inside one. it probably did not help. next, mary clickmas. _ it probably did not help. next, mary clickmas. mary _ it probably did not help. next, | mary clickmas. mary clickmas. unbelievably it is not the only big technology story that has happened this year. irate of the world's richest men buying a certain social media company. ii buying a certain social media company-— company. if the 'ob losses across the i company. if the job losses across the board, - company. if the job losses across the board, big i company. if

>> i think the 11th circuit ruling is important in the case. what it did is i t basically said that the former president is not entitled to special treatment, that executed search warrants is a standard process for the justice department, for the fbi, when they are conducting an investigation. when that warrant is based on probable cause and it's approved by a judge, that there really were no strong arguments made by the former president, that is special master should be in place, and that he should receive any special treatment. so, i think the 11th circuit case and the opinion that was just issued really resets this case in terms of the way things normally would work for any individual who is the subject of a search in any investigation around the country. >> elie, how do you see the opinion? >> well anderson, first of all, this opinion is all that what we call jurisdiction. meaning the courts can't just do anything they feel like. and what the court of appeals today said is that the district court, in ordering the special master, went too fa

we've won cases at the eighth circuit can, at the supreme court and elsewhere. we shouldn't jettison our rights to free speech today to accomplish certain goals that are not within the framework of the first amendment. so i think there's a win-win option out there. sarah: there were a lot of sort of parables taking place in the hypotheticals. one was mentioned about the race issue. i think the greatest fear that we're seeing from the state of colorado can is the notion that an aclu i know has advanced these arguments as well in its own briefing, that there is the potential to return to the jim crow era. right? and that is of course something that none of us sitting on this stage would ever want. talk to me a little bit, erin and roger, about how likely something like that would be or if this is a unique and distinguishable circumstance. erin: absolutely the latter. there's zero chance for going back to jim crow days, those awful days. for two primary reasons. first, when you think about the cases it, ali's barbeque and those examples, you're talking about restau

that, the 11th circuit, said simply cannot stand. it's inconsistent with the notion of the rule of law that we fall in this country. so when you treat the president like anybody else, a search warrant is something that could be challenged after you are charged, and not before, so we're back to square one, he did delay by three months to, so as you say, when -- but at least we are finally where we should've been back in august. >> glenn kirschner, first of all congratulations to you and barbara mcquade, and every lawyer who appeared on this program discussing this case for being exactly right from the start. there was no jurisdiction and even with jurisdiction there is no basis for a special master. every single thing that you all said, the 11th circuit basically word for word got what you're saying. what does it mean, now,w going forward for jack smith, because it was a, delay but only a partial delay. because they were successful in getting the classified documents exempt from this special prosecutor process earlier in the appeals p

according to one version, the cause of the fire was a short circuit, which was left of the giant pavilion much will have to be spent on its restoration and why it caught fire in the report of olga armikova, the smoke has almost cleared openly. fire also does not ignite liquidated. it is in the building continue to work employees of the ministry of emergency situations sheds smoldering hearths according to the preliminary version the cause of the fire in the shopping center of the table is a short circuit due to rain. this is the second in a week that a shopping center burned down in the suburbs of moscow is again building a tract, in fact, a covered market, where goods for repairs were sold. and even a fire started almost at the same time early in the morning, when there were no visitors yet, a fire broke out in an open area next to the store where the part was stored. it's time the roof caught fire, after its partial collapse, the flame instantly engulfed the entire shopping center of 10.000 m². that's it, the fire was already extinguished from above from the ground and from the air it w

these are the same hybrids, integrated circuits of detectors. actually. they stand inside.locks. they are protected from external influencing factors with the help of a hermetically sealed case with a saving window for detectors. x-ray photons fall into a kind of trap system of oblique-incidence mirrors, this is a prototype of the artex telescope for design to boat tests, exactly this is now working in space, extracting invaluable data for scientists. mira, on this sample, scientists they can work out non-standard commands to solve various problems, check on the ground how the system will behave in space even before launch, the body was sheathed with copper armor, when the american nostar observatory was launched in 2012. it is there, well, a little bit using other technologies, it was also made for other tasks, but it was found that well, i think it’s a rather specific layout, that in addition to the light that passes through the mirror system to the detector, there is a huge side illumination. here, a solution was proposed in top of the telescope cover here such a layer o

the third circuit. h.r. . mr. hagerty: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator from tennessee. mr. hagerty: in the last week new details have come to light with tiktok to censor speech. this is not limited to twitter, but this news underscores the problem and the need of congressional action to protect the rights of the american people. americans need to know when government and big tech platforms are trying to manipulate what they can say or what they can read. recently published e-mails to show what the company did to prevent the americans to see a news story weeks before the election. the twitter executives locked the twitter account of the white house press secretary who simply mentioned a story that was published in an established american newspaper with one of the largest circumstances in the country. facebook admits it likewise limited the spread of the story based on a general warning from the fbi about propaganda. the evidence also emerged that in 2022, biden and democratic campaign o

in that circuit. and so the the supreme court justice who was assigned to the 10th circuit is a man named stephen field, who was a unionist democrat, a former ally of senator broderick, who was appointed by abraham lincoln in 1863. he comes again from a different wing of the democratic party, state democratic party, than the former chief justice terry. terry has resurrected his career in the aftermath of the civil war. as a prominent lawyer within california. and he crosses justice field's path in another context, he represents this woman, sarah hall, who was an ambitious up and comer in the the world of california politics in the 1870s. she attached herself to a wealthy industrialist and presented herself as married. although it seems that she was just the man's mistress. when the two separate, she produces a piece of paper that she claims is a marriage license and demands half of her ex-lovers, a state she is represented former chief justice terry and. eventually the two, while terry is representing

the decision by the first circuit -- fifth circuit, rather, also call into question the validity of the federal reserve. is that correct? mr. chopra: the cfpb's funding is the same funning a as the federal reserve system. so i think yes, it certainly does. and that is part of what the solicitor general in her petition for cert to the supreme court articulated. sen. reed: so we should get the reaction to federal reserve subject to congressional appropriations. we're trying to get that wrapped up a few months late than normal. i think that's something that should be at least on the table and considered. but let me direct my major attention to the military lending act. because i was helpful in getting it passed. can you tell us, give us an update on what you've done this year with supervision and enforcement of the military lending act? mr. chopra: we have taken a number of actions including against repeat offenders of the military lending act. we sued first cash, the nation's largest pawn lender. we have taken action in a number of other places including moneyline technologies a few month

as far as the points 815818 those are the circuit breaker required by hcd. the only reason anyone would think those are a problem is they think the plan isn't going to deliver the units we need. if we have a shitty plan the circuit breaker will kick in and if we encourage a shitty plan to observe the status quo and insure home owners keep their property values up that home owners keep their views and that we are just in the same place and not go toog have homes for people who need them or homes for kids or homes for friends and we will end moving out of the city unless we win the lottery. please push this forward. please take all the advice from hcd under account and don't risk losing affordable housing funding and this failing. thank you. >> good afternoon commissioners. (inaudible) i am a (inaudible) who worked tirelessly and practically effectless to (inaudible) housing element and to respond to feedback from a variety of stakeholders. i par titspated in some of the first housing policy group meetings back in 2020 and department was doing a lot of work ba

he'd already been freed by the 11th circuit.ere for the people he's now supervising are free to use the hundred three documents marked in the investigation. now there's no more feathers are there will be no more factors for the seven-day period a lapses to using the other sort of 13,000 pages of stuff. that's evidence about what this was being stored with, who had access to it, and so forth. that they're all gonna be adding up to the ultimate decision of whether to bring charters. i'd say, there's another element here. that shouldn't be overlooked which is one of the things jacks smith is gonna have to decide at some point. if he does say he's gonna move forward with asking the grand jury to indict someone in this. case either trump or some of his aides. is where to bring those charges. the most obvious place to bring them is in florida, that's where the documents are being held. that's where the obstruction happened, if there was a charge of obstruction. here even though, the grand jury that subpoenaed was defied based in d. c.

she exercise an unusual form of jurisdiction, called equity jurisdiction, and the 11th circuit had no trouble dismantling her decision. their analysis went something like this, they said that in order for a court to find it deck equity jurisdiction, the party who comes in front of them, in this case, trump, has to show that their constitutional rights have been callously disregarded. not only had trump's rights been not -- disregarded by the doj. in fact, the doj had gone to a federal judge who authorized a search warrant that they executed. that was was trump was complaining about. so the 11th circuit said that this case has to be this mist, the doj is entitled to continue investigation into trump, just like it would be with anyone else. >> you noted in your column that the court delivers a resounding loss to trump. he's told repeal, probably, well right, because that's kind of what donald trump does. what is the net effect of this? what happens now that the special master is no longer there, and that review of documents is no longer there. what is it that the department of justice c

then we see a microcircuit on a circuit board from the seventies.and we can pay attention that a little bit its volume changes. after that, we will be able to evaluate the microcircuits of the end, the eighties. they are getting smaller and smaller based on integrated circuits in zelenograd, they produced equipment for spacecraft and aviation, microcalculators and medical equipment, as well as tape recorders and televisions, a popular electronic game. well, wait , they also released here. the destructive nineties became a time of decline, but now zelenograd microelectronics is on the rise again. this is one of the oldest enterprises in the city built in sixty seventh year. today, up to a billion are produced here. microchip production is fully loaded at the plant every year, there is a wafer, which is a single-crystal silicon. here it is polished to the state of a mirror. he has about 300 surgeries to go through. uh, before he stands like a seagull, here's the plate with the chips. we see in english it is called a vaper. that is, in a waffle. we see

kikina, with the help of a manipulator showed that yes, the thermal control system of the external circuit was indeed violated. what is essentially an emergency situation the analysis of all this began, which means that on the ship ms 22 there are 2 thermal control circuits, one external and one internal, which is just responsible for maintaining the required temperature in the living compartment and in the instrumental aggregate compartment of the damage. so, it turned out to be an external contour. apparently, either a micro meteorite or space debris. well, this is a preliminary conclusion. e our commission could damage the radiator and on their own, which attracted to the leakage of coolant . so, for sure, for the first time the temperature in the living quarters began to rise. it reached 30°, the instrumental unit up to 40 took appropriate stabilization measures, which means that the temperature has stabilized not exceeding 30° recently. today. i spoke with the astronauts. they confirmed to me that the temperature in the living compartment was 27°c. december 16 the crew moved to the sh

they heat up, there is a short circuit, heating of the lamps or a short circuit of the wires.in causes of fires employees of the ministry of emergency situations in their video clearly demonstrated how quickly the new year tree ignites a faulty garland, can lead. by the tragedy, therefore , live spruce must be placed in wet sand and watered daily. low-quality garlands are most often sold on the streets in transitions and in shops of the so-called low prices . we looked into one of them with a professional electrician. the verdict is a disappointing product, dangerous thin and fragile wires. that is, at least some kind of insulation is needed to connect the two cores, there is not enough third insulation here. just if there is a short circuit, then there will be a spark in the ministry of emergency situations warn if there is a spark or an unpleasant smell , you should immediately turn off the garland from the network, if it comes to a fire, then the tree must be thrown on the floor, fire filled with water or covered with a dense wet blanket, then call the number, 112 alexander

every single thing that you all said, the 11th circuit basically word for word got what you're saying. what does it mean, now, is going 44 jack smith, because it was a, delay but only a partial delay. because they were successful in getting the classified documents exempt but a special prosecutor, process, earlier in the appeals process. so so they have been, working with now they have full access to everything, there's no bumps in the road now. >> yeah, lawrence the decks are completely clear now. jack smith can move forward at light speed if he chooses to. but i have to say, it sure looks like he chooses to. it is 24 days since his appointment, i think subjectively fair to say we've seen an acceleration of the investigative pace. first of all, on thanksgiving day, jack smith filed a letter to breathe with the 11th circuit, sort of calling out donald trump's defense team in the most direct and glenn terms imaginable. saying, his defense team is incorrect, and indeed jack smith was right. and then shortly thereafter, what do we see? we saw jack smith's team put three white house aides

the court is expected to consider and may uphold the fifth circuit's decision the funding structure isnconstitutional and if it does i have no doubt congress will act swiftly with appropriate funding after all congress has plenty of experience at appropriations that by acting now through legislation congress can ensure the smooth as possible transition this is the best interest not only of the cfpb in congress but consumers and our economy i called my colleagues democrats and republicans to join me in supporting the sensible reform. thank you mr. chairman. >> the honorable shopper from the director of the cfpb and previously served from the ftc commissioner after the passage of dodd frank joining as the assistant director then appointed to the student loan ombudsman and serving asec a special advisor the department of education. welcome and please proceed. >> thank you chairman ranking member and members of the committee. our economy and consumer finance markets are in transition out of d the pandemic and into a digital era. given the economic uncertainties in today's markets the cfpb

er, and that's just the whole vision of one circuit.ification products when exported further. we take these products to the exhibition, then we draw up contracts, we take actions, and sometimes force majeure circumstances arise during the delivery of products. unfortunately, or the arbitration court is necessary for our company to protect its interests, so this is exclusively team work and all services. i would say they complement each other. having passed such a thorny path together with manufacturers to buyers of the best goods, who know how to sell a lot and consistently conquer new markets and they sometimes agree despite many factors encourage well-deserved awards information about the best exporter of the year competition originates in the nineties first winners and start from three nominations. true, then only members of the bitp could be participants in the competition. now all belarusian exporters are fighting for this right, a positive foreign trade balance. belarus is not the first year this is their merit, but over time, the

tonight the 11th circuit court of appeals in atlanta has said, sorry, mr. president, you are now out of luck. they said, quote, it's a side show, and they did not stop there. they said in no uncertain terms about trump's argument, quote, the government disagrees with each contention. tonight it's attributed to all three judges on the panel, no single judge authored it. it's a showing of solidarity, and that's significant because those three judges were all nominated by republican presidents. two of them were nominated by trump themselves. let me tell you, those judges did not hold back, quote, in considering these arguments we are faced with a choice, apply our usual test, drastically expand the availability of equitable jury is dix for every subject of a search warrant or serve out an unprecedenteder plachblt they chose the first. we chose the sane one, which shuts this whole thing down. the ruling continues. the law is clear. we cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the wa

>> well, i think the 11th circuit decision was very important.ry likely that that will stand and he will get those classified -- those non-classified documents. while, back at the 11th circuit rule just regard to the smaller subset of the classified documents at the justice department could get them. now this is everything. no special master necessary, the justice department gets a look at all these. and i think it's a really important step to being able to move forward because you need to look at the documents to determine whether any of these defenses donald trump has put up have any validity whatsoever which documents you might want to use for any criminal case. so someone will have to review all those 13,000 documents. but now they can get to it, they can get on that when it was important step in advancing this case. so i think it's a really important victory for moving the case for it. >> so they can get on those documents that they have but the justice department keeps raising the prospect and court filings that they think there are other d

i found this ruling from the 11th circuit, quite a doozy. that's not an official legal term. how did you read it? >> yeah, federal appeals joey just generally talk in a very plain understated language. this wasn't understated, this was the three dodges tearing apart donald trump's legal arguments. and donald trump did get a good, -- drew up judge initially over -- judge cannon. who seems inclined to entertain all sorts of wackadoodles arguments. as luck ran out here, he drew a panel that was incredibly conservative, alex. these are three very, very conservative judges. but, they basically said this is a terrible legal argument. and when quote you didn't show, but i want to share with our viewers. is this -- the senate towards the end that trump's argument quote, defies our nations principle. that our law upholds roof out regard to numbers, wealth, or -- essentially, what the court saying is trump you want special privilege here just because you're the former president. you don't get that here, you're treated just like everybody else. and nobody would get a special master for

the fifth circuit saidhi accrued in 2014 but now they say 20.the re is in principle and unpredictable. it wil bden courts and litigants like with uncertain analyses comparing various state court opinions. accrual before denial of rehearing is a muc bter. it treats the states rehearing process as irrelevant. it threatens parle litigation especially in states with busy urts and short limitations. here's the straightforward answer. a skinner claim accrues a the end of the state court litigation. i welcome the crt question. >> counsel, could you spend a minute on pcily what liberty interests that you been deprived, that your client has been deprived of and to deprived m of it? >> your honor, of course. as a court recognized in osborne liberty interest is privy once innocenc wh newly discovered evidence and so is the crts in osborne is a procedural due proces to procedures need to be fair to vindicate that. here the allegation is that ere's a procedural due process violation based on the w the court of criminal appeals and texas iereted article 64. i

industry once again had to remind the enterprise of the importance of active work on the external circuit and the readiness to be the leader among manufacturers on the great road of sales outside the country , some managers faced misunderstanding and even unwillingness. without giving any information about yourself in the outer ring to us it seems that these are just the remnants of old thinking and underestimation of the role of marketing, without which to go out and gain a foothold on high levels. foreign market. it's just impossible. now exhibition activity is on a special account. it is very important to declare oneself and skillfully sell here. moreover, the region you are always taken into account is 100 africa middle east or the eurasian market, but the exposition is only part of a large marketing strategy of the enterprise, the belttp team belttp always offers exhibitors, a rich business program is negotiated with potential partners and organizes presentations. in the system for ltp and thanks to the seventy-year history of the chamber of commerce and industry and those connection

er, and that's just the whole vision of one circuit.elivered on. we take these products to the exhibition, then we arrange contracts, we turn out to be actions, and when delivering products, force majeure circumstances occur, sometimes. unfortunately, or the arbitration court is necessary for our company to protect its interests, so this is exclusively team work and all services. i would say they complement each other. having gone through such a thorny path together with manufacturers to buyers of the best goods, who know how to sell a lot and consistently conquer new markets and sometimes, despite many factors, they encourage information about the best exporters of the year in the competition start in the nineties with the first winners and start from three nominations. true, then only members of the belka pp could be participants in the competition; now all belarusian excursionists are fighting for this right, the positive external trade balance of belarus has been their merit for several years now, but over time, the number of nomina

i don't believe they can get a -- hearing for the win -- circuits before rogel local so they have to think of the supreme court. and it's not decided yet whether they want to do that. because the last time that the trump lawyers tried to appear on the circuit -- they got turned away. and most recently of course with the tax returns are actually lost at the supreme court. so i think there's a lot of consternation on the legal team about what will be due next. >> how big a blow, harry, is it that again two of these judges were trump appointed. one was i believe a george w. bush appointee. but all republicans. i mean, is there a sense that people are just not buying trump anymore? >> that is the important point, alex. it is not as if all of the sudden judges are changing. it is really important to note that this was a very basic missed up by the judge below. so the key to hugo's point, what their wing is a couple more weeks of delay against the certainty that the court is going to reject doing anything here. so he will get that texture pr blow. that is the only thing going. this is fini

when the 11th circuit outlines in this ruling is that the former president ever put forward any facts or sworn declarations, anything that would have backed up his claims that there was constitutional violations, that there was irreparable harm. this was a ruling basically saying, we don't know what you are thinking, judge cannon, but you got it wrong. this whole thing is being shut down. now >> it almost seemed like their argument wise, but i'm special, but i'm the former president, and you can do this to a former president. that was a talking point about the audacity of executing a search warrant. i'll be at one that was validly issued but still the fact that it went to mar-a-lago. that did not fly for this court because they were thinking about precedent, which we know is kind of a taboo word, thinking about how it's overturned recently in washington d. c.. but, bradley idea of the precedent that said this was somehow so special that when doj wanted to have an investigation and have a search warrant, that just because you didn't want it to happen, you've got a pass. >> so basically

john: you were a judge on the third circuit were nearly 16 years before joining the supreme court. what was it like serving on panels with your former boss and what are some of the other things that stand out in your mind? justice alito: it was a great experience. when i finished the clerkship with judge garth, i thought this is my dream job if i could become a judge on the third circuit. and the arrogance of youth i said i am really ready to do that right now. the president did not think it was appropriate to appoint me. i thoroughly enjoyed the clerkship. it was a little strength the first time i sat on a panel with leonard garth. i the feeling, do i need to write him a bench memo? he treated me as an equal. i had wonderful colleagues. i will not name names because i will omit somebody, but they really powerfully impressed to me in different ways of what it means to be a good judge. when a new federal judges appointed, many of you may know this, the judges sent to bb judge school -- baby judge school. district court appointees go for two weeks, it is a lot of stuff they need to l

the eighth circuit appeal all sound is found standing in similar situations because she can't operate her business, he can't create a website without violating the law and that would trigger all these. >> erin, what's your perspective on some of the particular factual distinctions that remain? there seems to be a theme of making that distinction between what is you are for example sales where conduct and what is speech? here she's squarely selling a service where it expresses a marriage. it expresses the approval of the celebration of a marriage. where does the court draw that line? >> i think that's a major point of contention and if you look at colorado's argument whatthey're essentially saying is if you open up a business in america you lose your first amendment right . they say if you open up a business the government can tell you what to say. in response lori says no, the first amendment applies and i think the court was concerned with colorado's broad construction of the law of public accommodation and of course the there's hypotheticals but the court has to draw theline between

circuit. mr. stone: certainly, justice kavanaugh. so contemporary legal dictionaries, indeed, even the dictionary, merriam-webster's, on which petioners cite in its e definition, defined set aside to mean annul or to overrule, that's in 1-b of their definition. that fits comfortably with the history recognized in this court prior to and leading up to the administrative procedure act. that definition pairs 706-2's whole unlawful and set aside which has the vacatur remedy we've been discussing along with 706-1 which unquestionably provides a remedy to order agency action on reasonably withheld. so the enter textual clues, the intertextual clues and history from this court and administrative practice prior to and leading up to the apa all point in the same direction. the courts have properly been issuing vacatur under 706-2 since the beginning. justice barrett: just a quick one on vacatur. i mean, i agree with justice alito, this is a huge issue, and i frankly i wasn't expecting the 706 briefing. i thought we were just going to get brie