well, iconic filmmaker clint eastwood, your book is pretty much gone. [laughter] because clint wanted it to be a father/daughter picture, the young hero in the book, jack graham, the young lawyer, was not in the film anymore. but even to that point when i w was on the train, when i heard that news too, they had pay phones on the train, credit cards. i got on theed phone, i called everybody i'd ever known. hello, mrs. dugan? you're not going to believe what's happened to me. [laughter] >> host: how old wereel you? >> guest: i was 34. yeah. >> host: and this just kind of happened so fast after 20 years of -- i mean, you really must have beent mentally, hard to process. >> guest: it was dream-like, and every day was something new, you know? today show wanted me on. you know, good morning america wanted me on. i wase b on the local d.c. chanl 9 here years ago, and i remember being on there, and my whole lan firm at holland and knight was watching me because they wanted me to come on and talk about it. in the end, are you doing the film and book rights? andre

when clint eastwood i got a call from bill goldman, the screenwriter because castro hired him to write the screenplay before eastwood hired under bill called up and said hey, great news, bad news. okay, what's the good is? iconic film maker clint eastwood just sign on the line to star and direct in absolute power. congratulation. clint eastwood, unbelievable. what's the bag is? he said iconic film actor clint eastwood just signed to star and direct to produce the filter your book is pretty much gone. because he wanted to be father daughter here. even at that point when i was on the train when heard that news, they had payphones on the train back in. credit card, i got on the phone and call anybody i item in my life, like hello, mr. dugan? you would be a first grade. you're not going to believe what's happened to me. >> host: how old were you? >> guest: 34. >> host: this just happened so fast after 20 years, i mean you really must have been hard to process. >> guest: it was a dreamlike. everyday something do. some today shawon me to be on, good morning america me to be on. i would on lo

opinions to be honest ok because i don't see how anyone really in hollywood it's ever really clint eastwood i can show my prejudice but i don't see that they're particularly well informed and i don't know why they should try to get involved in the political process go ahead yes for example when they're saying you know destroy ice it's only existed for fifteen years that's not true it's just called a different name before so when hollywood comes out on these some of these issues they sort of they make some mistakes because they don't have the historic knowledge that you're talking about and and that doesn't look at either but i think that ron illustrates a really key point here that should be punctuated and that is when when both parties were both listening to the same tune right at the wall street the you know whoever came up whoever had the big money because they needed it to be reelected that right there is what i think that people like me who like civility who like you know i am a conservative bona fide as best i can tell again i keep an open mind but i think i am but that's what i liked

political opinions to be honest ok because i don't see anyone really in hollywood except maybe clint eastwood i can show my prejudice but i don't see that they're particularly well informed and i don't know why they should try to get involved in the political process go ahead yes for example when they're saying you know destroy ice it's only existed for fifteen years that's not true it's just called a different name before so when hollywood comes out on these some of these issues they sort of they make some mistakes because they don't have the historic knowledge that you're talking about and and that doesn't look at either but i think that ron illustrates a really keen point here that should be punctuated and that is when when both parties were both listening to the same tune right at the wall street the you know whoever came up whoever had the big money because they needed it to be reelected that right there is what i think that people like me who like civility who like you know i am a conservative bona fide as best i can tell again i keep an open mind but i think i am but that's what i like

political opinions to be honest ok because i don't see how anyone really in hollywood except maybe clint eastwood i can show my prejudice but i don't see that they're particularly well informed and i don't know why they should try to get involved in the political process go ahead yes for example when they're saying you know destroy ice it's only existed for fifteen years that's not true it's just called a different name before so when hollywood comes out on these some of these issues they sort of they make some mistakes because they don't have the historic knowledge that you're talking about and and that doesn't look at either but i think that ron illustrates a really keen point here that should be punctuated and that is when when both parties were both listening to the same tune right at the wall street you know whoever came up whoever had the big money because they needed it to. you reelected that right there is what i think that people like me who like civility who like you know i am a conservative bona fide as best i can tell again i keep an open mind but i think i am but that's what i liked

, make my day, but fred, it was like a clint eastwood, make my day, because i'm going to argue you willll market, everything that has been accompanying it, what do you think? >> i would worry about that and what lenore said is true, that the market hasn't been as good this year as it was last year. on the other hand have we had a correction? has it dropped a lot? neil: good point. >> i have a few stocks and they have done okay. i haven't -- neil: you're independently wealthy. we don't count you. we don't count you. lenore maybe. but lenore, would that be jeopardized if people were chasing the president down? normally impeachment efforts in the past when they involved richard nixon, bill clinton in that process it is very shaky for stocks to stablize. what do you think? >> it is definitely shaky for stocks. it is shaky for the economy. i'm not really happy with the direction the public discourse has gone on this we live under the rule of law. the rule of law is not something supposed to be bought. so if the argument is, if, let's first address, is this a legal issue? now if it's a legal

i brought these new clint eastwood movie. it documents a famous case in france. in six men leapt up and took them on. and three of them were americans. that kind of hair was as a classically male do. you cannot talk about men being toxic without recognizing men be an honorable and notable. i'm brave. but you won't hear that from feminist. they've been preaching that all differences are socially constructed. some ideas so absurd only an intellectual could believe them. all the snow from the evidence of our senses that some traits are more pronounced than one. with three sons which meant that we have to get used to a certain amount of property damage and trips to the emergency room. i dismount as best i could when we went to the zoo. brain organization. from disease to responses and drugs. and of course it's true that it affects behavior to some degree. so early that are universally observed that they cannot be said to be anything other than an eight. they can distinguish photographs. where they usually cannot. baby boys are more interested in girls. there are many

on the plane after i watched these new clint eastwood movie, the 1572 paris which documents the famous case in france where there was a terrorist who came out of the bathroom on the train and began firing the people. six men leapt up and took him on. three of them were americans. look, that kind of self-sacrificing heroism is a classically male thing to do. you cannot talk about men being toxic without organizing men being honorable, noble and brave. you will not hear that from feminists. [applause] for 60 years feminists have been preaching the mantra that all sex differences are constructive. it reminds me of the george orwell quote, there are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them. [laughter] all of us know from the evidence of our sexes of our senses, rather, particularly if her parents that some traits are more pronounced in one sex than the other. we had three sons which meant that we had to get used to a certain amount of property damage and trips to the emergency room in our house. it meant that i had to endure endless videos of road construction mach

it also comes at a time in which the president has been receiving different pieces of advice, clint eastwoodt according to sources i've talked about, whether or not to give an interview to robert mueller's team and as well as the special counsel. former mayor rudy giuliani has been outspoken about this and has offered differentiating analysis or call it you what want in terms of how that police station operation -- that operation is going. to wrap this up, it does speak to just how divisive the legal team of the president is. >> you're alluding to the tweet that came from giuliani right after the article came out. giuliani does say this investigation needs to be fin h finished, and a paraphrase of the quote on the screen now. sema, with this information, the data they have here, schmidt and haber man here, 30 hours of discussions, right? three voluntary interviews over the course of nine months. one has to say, if you're the defense, that's a whole lot of stuff that you're giving to somebody who's trying to get you. >> right. and also we know that don mcghny was around the crucial moments th

in the immortal words of clint eastwood in "unforgiven" deserve's goth nothing to do it.arket is going to make mistakes your job is to progress when it's doing something wrong and to try to take advantage of it stick with cramer. >>> i love hearing from the smartest audience in television. that's you, cramerica. so let's get to some tweets. first a tweet from @brick hand 65 he says @jimcramer, jim, why when a caller named richard calls in, do you and the staff say his name in a high snitch okay, well that's a reference to the movie "tommy boy" chris farley and david spade let's say a caller is named richard, we say -- >> richard >> thank you now a tweet he says hi, jim cramer any advice for new parents investing for the newborn child? so many options out there. do a uniform gift of minors to get started then you can do something to state by state. buy growth stocks. they've got their whole lives ahead to make the money back buy high quality growth stocks the likes of which we talk about all the time on this show. next saup twit from @stall cup wend different she says @mad

is the president's clint eastwood there more dire warning for democrats? a very economic boom in which your own political future hangs, that gets the hook, too. you decide with kevin and the white house. charles payne in new york and a lot of investors very weird that the president is indeed right. market pros around the country, certain to rattle your money no matter your politics. as we begin with kevin in the white house. >> neil, always good to be with you. to say that they are thrilled with the direction that the economy is headed in, would be frankly a huge understatement. to that end, from the president's perspective, his threat is born of the numbers. let me take you to twitter and share you a little bit of what he has been talking about. this has been a recurring theme for this white house, the longest bull run in the history of the stock market, congratulations america. here's the catch. if immigrants reach control of the house, after the midterm elections this fall, impeachment could become a political priority for them. the president, as you ca

it was one where clint eastwood, they had to go capture some heroes was a brilliant movie for the purposes of war. they managed to get you the sense of something big and turn it into something small. saving "private ryan," i disagree with you about the banter. it's exactly what people do in small units in combat. >> about the what? >> the banter. >> about the skricript. >> i'm saying they are using lines, version of lines from terantino films. it would -- >> it swrouwould have been 1960 banter. >> i thought were were talking about d day still. i don't think donald sutherland would make sense in world war ii. he's a hippie. it's part of the film having a double existence. it make sense for the banter to reflect the time being represented. the film is going to date if it's very much of the moment in which it's made. >> i think it's a really important -- thank you for bringing that up, an important reminder. there's war and there are war movies. that includes documentaries. if you think about what the marines which is very focused. you have to tell a story that people can digest and understan

it was one with clint eastwood and they had to capture heroes. it was a brilliant movie. for the purposes of war they managed to take something big and turned it into something small. with saving private ryan, i disagree with you about this. this is exactly what people do. i disagree with you about the banter, the script. >> that the things that they're saying, there actually using lines from quentin tarantino . it is not 1940s banter, it is 1990s banter. >> this is 1965 banter when i was in vietnam. >> and and kelly's heroes, the banter in there also. >> this is a good example of when a world war ii movie is dealing with the president. this would make sense as a character in world war ii but he is basically a heavy. it's a great invention but this part of the film having a double existence and existing in its own time and existing in the time it is being resented. surely there will be banter. but if you're interested for making sense for the banter to represent the time or if the film is very much of the moment in which it is made. >> thank you for bringing that up becau

. >> maybe it's more of a clint eastwood, go ahead, make my day. >> make my day. >> so you think theainful for china to follow through even though they're so focused on saving face back home >> i think china are tremendously over leveraged. you can look at the numbers they release and maybe yes, maybe no. but i think they're in a very difficult position right now and i think they will do their best to save face. but i think they're going to back up way before we ever get to any kind of a trade war with them and by the way, i think that europe will do the same. i think there'll be some negotiations there'll be some price adjustments, but i do not think we're going to have a trade war with europe or china >> austan, this is supposed to be a jobs panel and i hijacked it to talk about trade and other issues let's wrap it together you get trade, the economy, all the things we're following, the jobs report today, and the fed's got to be adding all of that up and thinking what? >> i think the fed is mostly thinking what they've publicly been saying. they think the economy is quite strong an

political opinions to be honest ok because i don't see how anyone really in hollywood except clint eastwoodi can show my prejudice but i don't see that they're particularly well informed and i don't know why they should try to get involved in the political process go ahead yes for example when they're saying you know destroy ice it's only existed for fifteen years that's not true it's just called a different name before so when hollywood comes out on these some of these issues they sort of they make some mistakes because they don't have the historic knowledge that you're talking about and and that doesn't look at either but i think that ron illustrates a really key point here that should be punctuated and that is when when both parties were both listening to the same tune right at the wall street the you know whoever came up whoever had the big money because they needed it to be reelected that right there is what i think that people like me who like civility who like you know i am a conservative bona fide as best i can tell again i keep an open mind but i think i am but that's what i liked

the second best movie ever made also did that, it was one where clint eastwood and -- they had to go capture some -- "kelly's heroes" was a brilliant movie for the purposes of war. they managed to get you a sense of something big and then turn it into something small. so "saving private ryan" one of the things -- and by the way i disagree with you about the banter. it's exactly what people do in small units in combat. >> about the what? i didn't hear that. >> the banter. about the script. >> oh, no. i'm saying that the things they're saying, they're using lines, versions of lines from tarantino films. it isn't banter like 1940s banter, it's 1990s banter. >> well, it would have been 1960s banter, 1965 banter when i was in vietnam. >> okay. i thought we were talking about d-day. >> and "kelly's heroes" also was -- the banter in there was very -- >> but in "kelly's heroes" is a good example of how a world war ii movie is dealing with the present. i don't think donald sutherland would make sense as a character in world war ii but he is basically a hippie and it's a great invention, but i