david cameron asking us someone else's. people didn't even know what they we re people didn't even know what they were voting on, ridiculous. charles smith, i woke up late in edinburgh at 9am. i was meant to be in leeds for8am. it at 9am. i was meant to be in leeds for 8am. it was a particularly gruelling tour. yes, i've slept in on this shift and it was a scary moment. i'll be back for business briefing. i'll see you soon. stay with us. hello there. storm ali brought damaging winds across parts of the uk on wednesday. wind gusts of more than 90mph for parts of northern ireland. you can see this hook of cloud on the satellite picture, that's the storm pushing off towards scandinavia, but that doesn't mean things will be quiet over the next couple of days, far from it. during thursday it's all about this wriggling weather front feeding outbreaks across some parts of the country. there will still be some brisk winds at times. this is how we start the day with rain in the south—west, wales, the midlands and parts of east of en

she did that as home secretary as well under david cameron. she stubbornly refuses to shift. the eu won't accept chequers. it is blatantly obvious to everybody that she needs to renegotiate and come back to the eu with something better so she can bring it back to parliament and she is just stubbornly refusing to do so. is just stubbornly refusing to do so. meanwhile, her own party is attacking her for so. meanwhile, her own party is attacking herfor doing chequers in the first place. whichever way she turns... luna it is bananas. -- it is bananas. jeremy hunt was speaking at the conference, i think it was the last speaker. he told a few jokes. what did you think? he is playing to the gallery. he spoke to the party faithful. i think he is positioning himself if the top job becomes vacant. he has very much spoken of this possibility. this was a political speech for the party so they can stamp their feet and say hurrah. i expect a couple of the ex— secretaries would have condemned it roundly and said, oh, this isn't good enough. it makes me warm to him even more because i good e

but i think if you had a second referendum, it will be a betrayal of what david cameron promised the equally strongly, to make a point on the other side of the argument, that actually what should be voted on ben is the actual deal and of course what we have not even mentioned, putting all that aside, there is no majority in parliament, it would seem, four dl... —— fora majority in parliament, it would seem, four dl... —— for a deal. majority in parliament, it would seem, four dl. .. -- for a deal. a binding referendum. putting brexit to the side for a moment. good! the telegraph has a story about rehabilitating prisoners by giving them a phone. did you think it would work? i will revise what he said la st work? i will revise what he said last hour. it is interesting. it seems that quite a lot of evidence that has been given to mr gauke that this would help of the behaviour of —— well, this would help of the behaviour of — — well, overcrowded this would help of the behaviour of —— well, overcrowded prisons —— and it seems that he has visited germany re ce ntly it seems that he has vis

jimmy cliff was on this show a while back it was couldn't hide is just changed over prime minister david cameron and there's always a political angle in this photograph. i don't think what i would trying to do is to document something that people could see and it could inspire younger people and i think that was really one of my main aims to say look you know can look through this photo but you can do better so i wanted them to do things better than me and i know dick. than. anything the inspiration for all these images that take the inspiration to the young people but it was do better than me i don't know whether it's turning back to the seventy's but it's that's being blamed by black people as being blamed for a crime that the government saying that they should ban and music and that's to blame for crime would would you think of well i don't think that's sensible you know and because they'll get it anyway i mean you had a very successful community radio station which went to taken over by corporate as it were would you be playing drill music i don't think so. but what what we did was to give a

we have been discussing brexit since 2010, since david cameron was prime minister.as dominated so many european summits, it has to stop. britain has to choose what kind of relationship. the europeans also have other problems than brexit like immigration and reform so to be fair the brexit agreement will be quite easy because the europeans don't want to have that as another problem. the conservative party conference is this week which means we can all take stock again next week. political divisions have been laid bare on capitol hill over the last few days and been watched by millions of americans on tv as the process began to question president trump's nominee to be the nextjustice of the supreme court. there were powerful and emotional scenes as the senatejudiciary committee heard from christine blasey ford, a university professor who's one of three women who've accused brett kavanaugh of sexual assault. the nominee himself was often aggressive and angry in his questioning that followed. the division between republicans and democrats in response to the testimonies

david cameron was opposed to them and held endless numbers to his cost and, arguably, the countries.urope, was opposed to referendums and then discovered he liked them. it is just possible that if there is a crisis, paralysis, no party is leadable on it, that the main party leaders decide that we should take this back and let the people tell us what to do. i put it at 10% but it is not impossible and it might be a way through. trump said post brexit we will have our own deal... this was before the trade war with china and everything else. where are we on that front, in terms of the sounds coming out on twitter at 5am? he has other concerns at the moment, obsessed with finding out who wrote the new york times article about him. he is doubling down on the trade wars and he thinks he's got great job numbers and wages are going up in the uk. the economic report yesterday was a major boost in the midterms. a lot of that has been front loaded perhaps before the real trade war proper starts with the 200 billion on chinese goods, so people seem to be doing a lot of trade and business before

have thought the man from number ten who called the referendum would have had a plan, but no, david cameronwhat about the other side — those who campaigned to leave, like boris johnson? surely, they would have had a plan. well, no again. they were worried that if they did have a plan, they might scare off potential supporters. the truth is, there is no political agreement about what brexit does mean, could mean or even should mean. theresa may has got no majority in parliament, her party is deeply divided, and so are the labour party. if getting agreement at home has proved mighty hard, it's made getting a deal in europe much harder. thank you. now, there are people who do business deals who say, "why doesn't the prime minister do it like i would? talk tough and threaten to walk out of the negotiations if she doesn't get what she wants. why doesn't she behave a bit more like donald trump?" there is an answer to that. there aren't a lot of business deals in which you are having to negotiate with 27 other leaders at the same time as your board, your shareholders and your customers are all hav

they did not take that solution even when david cameron offered it.le kinds of reforms and they would not give him anything. free movement of people is critical. yesterday, she said there is three million eu citizens living in britain and you are welcome to stay and that was the most significant thing she said. that is something that should have been negotiated on six months ago. free movement of people effectively amounts to importing unemployed people from poor countries to supply cheap labour for rich countries. is there a deal still to do or is there no deal? there will be, i think, a paper—thin deal that will please no—one. can ijust add something, we talked about europe, but we should have been talking about british domestic politics because it's is about the dup, we've not spoken about labour, labour is completely awol on the brexit debate. in western europe, the first few months of the second world war is often described as the phoney war — it was officially on, but there were few military clashes. donald trump's trade war with china feels muc

have thought the man from number ten who called the referendum would have had a plan, but no, david cameronmpaigned to leave, like boris johnson? surely, they would have had a plan. well, no again. they were worried that if they did have a plan, they might scare off potential supporters. the truth is, there is no political agreement about what brexit does mean, could mean or even should mean. theresa may has got no majority in parliament, her party is deeply divided, and so are the labour party. if getting agreement at home has proved mighty hard, it's made getting a deal in europe much harder. thank you. now, there are people who do business deals who say, "why doesn't the prime minister do it like i would? talk tough and threaten to walk out of the negotiations if she doesn't get what she wants. why doesn't she behave a bit more like donald trump?" there is an answer to that. there aren't a lot of business deals in which you are having to negotiate with 27 other leaders at the same time as your board, your shareholders and your customers are all having a row in public about what you're do

up and he took them and what happened he got arrested and spent four months in prison went to david cameron say in parliament to the people he said if you're old enough to do the crime you're old enough to do the time because they were sixteen year old kids who did months in prison at that time here marci is saying well if you're very wealthy in prominent members of the community that's his quote they were afraid of the reputational damage that a criminal trial for fraud money laundering or tax evasion would break so they decided not to bring those trials because if you're if you're very wealthy and prominent it's reputational damage and we don't want to do that to you but if you're if you're old enough to do that if you're old enough to steal those forty pound pair of trousers right on the sidewalk you're old enough to do the time buddy tell you what's really sad is that a lot of british people would agree with that when people get ripped off every day if they're so transfixed by a lot of people who are saying a lot of and the monarchy that they believe that they the queen is actually the

have thought the man from number ten who called the referendum would have had a plan, but no, david cameroner side — those who campaigned to leave, like boris johnson? surely, they would have had a plan. well, no again. they were worried that if they did have a plan, they might scare off potential supporters. the truth is, there is no political agreement about what brexit does mean, could mean or even should mean. theresa may has got no majority in parliament, her party is deeply divided, and so are the labour party. if getting agreement at home has proved mighty hard, it's made getting a deal in europe much harder. thank you. now, there are people who do business deals who say, "why doesn't the prime minister do it like i would? talk tough and threaten to walk out of the negotiations if she doesn't get what she wants. why doesn't she behave a bit more like donald trump?" there is an answer to that. there aren't a lot of business deals in which you are having to negotiate with 27 other leaders at the same time as your board, your shareholders and your customers are all having a row in publi

she conducted a review of antibiotic resistant for david cameron's government.now, i was a minister in the treasury, i would say it was a top five policy priority. i 'm not aware of it being publicly mentioned in any international forum by any of our leading cabinet ministers, never mind the pm, since. so it sank right down. yes. and obviously because i hear from plenty of other people who don't understand why. he said greater emphasis should now be placed on diagnosing illnesses. in view of the additional health funding many announced, or implied or has it been annnounced? yes. it would seem to me an absolutely perfect time to try to devote a lot of that on diagnostics. one or two of the comments about that. if i'm pushed, as i often am, as to what is the single most important intervention that i think will make a huge difference, it would be diagnostics, because as an economist and financier, i think about it in terms of supply and demand, and we can get all the new drugs that we need to get hopefully, although it's not looking as though that's round the corne

perhaps 50 years from now, on how the conservative party has handled the europe question since david cameronvatives have done in office? i think they will. and i think the reason they will is that, when we've got over the next few months, when we've left the european union, on whatever basis, and we've been discussing a number of them, they'll see and they'll be able to have demonstrated to them the great success that brexit will be, and the great strengths which it will bring to our countries, the tremendous opportunities which exist right outside the european union. and i think, when all the fruits of that fateful referendum are available and visible to them, they'll see that, actually, the conservative party has delivered for the people of our country. michael howard, we must revisit. but, for now, thank you for being on hardtalk. hello, good morning. it's fair to say that yesterday across england and wales felt a bit more like summer. in the sunshine in lincolnshire, we had temperatures here as high as 25 celsius. now, today, still going to be dry in most places. there'll still be some s

prime minister trades amaze old home of his colleague norman baker who's david cameron as a minister of state building thanks for coming back on we're going to go to lehman brothers in a second but obviously with two more liberal democrat all of them conference i got to ask you as a house member to the other week will you be becoming the next leader of the democrats and sits with lloyd george and with him to had since that action when liechtenstein wouldn't so well cock up us all forward and also the prime minister your old colleague at the home office was we going to be covering it later in the show said parliamentarians should not be appearing on this channel because you risk becoming a propaganda asset for vladimir putin and no one's propaganda that i've always put my own mind will continue to do so and i believe in an open free democracy and one could snoop in for you press people to switch off or you can just agree that we shouldn't be stifling people's voices that's a very dangerous road to go even the scottish liberal democrats all the right in emergency motion saying that imm

in 2013, david cameron called for a war, as he tended, with silicon valley leaders.ed action. to be fair, he did get some, google announced algorithms to block illegal content, microsoft gave away for free it's photo illegal content, microsoft gave away forfree it's photo id illegal content, microsoft gave away for free it's photo id system, illegal content, microsoft gave away forfree it's photo id system, that trawls the web. there was a database created to speed up investigations, all good progress. but the threat has outstripped the technology and resources , has outstripped the technology and resources, and creating legislation an effective legislation, will be very complex. it seems to me there are three capable areas. one, verification. it is still very poor. you or i, with an e—mail and mobile phone, could set up a bogus account right now and be completely anonymous online. anonymity breeds crime. encryption, there has been a huge increase in encrypted messaging, live streaming apps and the dark web, and the police simply cannot break in there. and jurisdicti

bad anything and what is very important talking about human rights violations you know africa david cameron when he wasn't polish several years ago suggest that stolpe in any economic aid to those african countries which do not recognize single sex marriage which is a cruel decision because a lot of african countries are mostly him and again africa doesn't have to be on the same standard with the u.k. you know you can jump to a condor three hundred years but came out and did it he enforced it i don't know thirty. that me and i would go america there at the same time tour in africa right now and they don't even mention it they just see that the you know there's a maid is very proud. to zero point seven or their budget for help to the developing countries huge amount of money right and then i want to talking about quality a lot of africa and they don't respond to questions the african union was against. what's up but what's the u.s. did not do it to some extent that you know the whole mantra is that you accept western values and you accept. a western tradition when it comes to racism being an

strong words from sajid javid but in truth we have been here before, the then prime minister david cameronlled a council of war with silicon valley, he demanded action, he did get some, for example, google enhanced its algorithms to block illegal content, microsoft gave out for free new software which could detect illegal images online, the british police created a new database to speed up the investigation. the threat has simply outstripped both the technology and the resources, and creating effective legislation is going to be highly complex, it seems there is three seriously problematic areas: verification, if you have an e—mail address and a phone, you can be anybody online. an anonymity, criminality, it simply blossoms. encryption, a huge rise in encrypted messaging and live streaming apps, including the dark web, they cannot be broken into by the police. finally, jurisdictions, sounds boring, very important, firms are based abroad, when british police complain they want to get information from these companies, often it takes a lot of time, sometimes months, and it can cost a lot of m

equally if the honours system is concerned about it being brought into disrepute, why did we get david cameron'sist featuring a lot of controversial figures. sporting honour is really only over the last 20 years have reflected actual merit. virginia wade had to wait. joe perry was never honoured. i do think you have a system which obviously is inconsistent in so many ways. look at david beckham, for example. embarrassing e—mails to be sure but thatis embarrassing e—mails to be sure but that is not the point. look at the number of caps and his charitable work. surely he should be honoured and geta work. surely he should be honoured and get a knighthood? this question might also be raised about the role of hrm -- hmrc. they might also be raised about the role of hrm —— hmrc. they are busy consulted about names put forward because the dummett wants to know if there is something embarrassing that may subsequently come out if the honour is made. rather than putting a black spot against these names, hmrc should be tough on the schemes themselves and the people who organise the schemes rather than effe

it reminded me of the day after the referendum, david cameron, i won't quit, he did quit.y looked like they had lost. this is what it reminded me of. again, we don't know what this photo was about but it doesn't look good. this is their week without trying to roll out their vision. we believe they are going to put up an alternative and oi'i going to put up an alternative and on the eve of the tory conference, we'll see. let's move on to the front page of the daily telegraph. according to the daily telegraph, farmers first in line for grants. these are farmers who are going to protect the countryside. the environment secretary is talked about this before. keeping distance from the different tribes and groups. it's about what division could be. what are going to do, where are we going to be? this is this and of how we replace the common agricultural policy. left right and centre. we are not going to base it on land. it's going to be that what you produce. there is a story elsewhere about how you use similar money. taking back to pay elderly farmers. it's been around before.

that was what was sold by david cameron.about brexit and we will try to answer them. also today, the mayor of london launches another scheme to tackle violent crime in the capital, based on a successful one in glasgow we told you about at the start of this year. callum tells us that scheme in scotland is the reason he is still alive. i was running out of chances. i've got more lives than a siamese cat, do you know what i mean? it's just unbelievable how many times i've diced with death. we'll ask the mother of a boy who was killed on the streets of london if this is the answer. and how to clear space junk with nets and harpoons. a british satellite has for the first time successfully netted a piece of space debris. we will find out how they did it. on the remove debris mission, they will be testing the smaller brother of this one to show that we can successfully capture a piece of space debris in space using a harpoon. a little later than usual, for obvious reasons, here isjoanna with the news. the eu's chief breixt negotiat

david cameron rebooted the policy, and tried to extend it. and numbers of new social rented homes are this year. and the murder rate has almost halved over a decade. keith doyle has more. crime died in the capital. on a north london street. and died an hour later. he hasn't been formally identified, and nobody has been arrested. with the goal of ridding the peninsula of nuclear weapons. to eliminate the risk of war. our correspondent laura bicker is in seoulfor us now. good morning to you. thank you so much forjoining us. much forjoining us. tell us how significant this meeting is. significant this meeting is. it is a huge step for president moon. moon. he has managed to do something that president trump couldn't do. that president trump couldn't do. of details he is willing to give with regard to denuclearisation. with regard to denuclearisation. one is a missile one is a nuclear facility. facility. site, he is willing to let experts in. in. say look, is this irreversible or not? not? not going to destroy it unless the us takes some action as well. us takes some action as well. your

we write about tony blair and david cameron occupying that space and winning elections on that sort of divided, and i think the reason we're suddenly saying the ground beneath all the parties split in various directions and crack is because everyone realised, "ooh, actually, we all thought we were here... "crumbs, we're not. "we are so divided." so do you think that the british, we are quite binary, we quite like to know clearly that that's that and you've got this option, and they are far apart and you can choose one or the other? i think there's a really broad spectrum, and i think one of the issues is for maybe the last 30 years both conservatives and labour thought that people who didn't vote would never vote, and therefore elections were fought and won and lost on a small number of people right in the centre of politics who may vote labour, they may vote conservative. and what has happened since is that bothjeremy corbyn‘s labour party and people like ukip have realised that actually the way to win elections could be to get people who haven't previously voted to start voting, to r

i think we sort of assumed that everyone was in the centre, we write about tony blair and david cameronstraightforward as we went like to have thought. actually, it's incredibly divided. we are seeing the ground beneath all the parties split in various directions, and the reason it's cracked is because everyone realised, actually, we thought we were here, and we're not. we are so divided. are we quite binary then, we like to know is that we have this option, they are far apart, one or the other?” we have this option, they are far apart, one or the other? i think it's a really broad spectrum. 0ver the last 30 years with the conservatives and labour thinking that people didn't vote and would never vote so parties were fought and won, and last, on a small number of right and centre politics to make up of right and centre politics to make up labour, and may vote conservative. what's happened is thatjeremy corbyn's conservative. what's happened is that jeremy corbyn's labour conservative. what's happened is thatjeremy corbyn's labour party and people like ukip have realised that the way to w

he threat that forced david cameron to triggerthe referendum.eferendum on the leave vote in the referendum on the 23rd of june the leave vote in the referendum on the 23rd ofjune 2016. despite the combined forces of the political establishment, the media establishment, the media establishment, and the international establishment, and the international establishment, campaigning for a remain vote, they lost and we won. and that believe vote was a magnificent victory for democracy and ordinary people. and what has happened in the two years and three months since? well, we have not left the european union yet, that is the show. theresa may and her cross party we st show. theresa may and her cross party west mr establishment have no intention of fully committing a complete exit from the european union, if they can possibly avoid it. they would like to reverse the decision of the referendum altogether but failing that, they will settle for brexit in name only. the so—called deal theresa may wants to achieve is one whereby we pay the eu lots of money,

prime minister, asking him to apologize or detract his comments about then candidate trump, david cameronuldn't have been calling donald trump stupid. it doesn't matter if the u.k. is an allie, the prime minister shouldn't have intervened in the process. a couple of days after that interview, all of a sudden i'm approached by two officials from what i think are the defense intel jeans agent sift u.s. embassy in london who decide to meet with me. basically probe me about what's happening. and then a day or so after that, alexander downer wants to meet me in a bar along with his assistant who was an australian intelligence officer. i do not remember talking about e-mails with alexander downer. he himself has contradicted himself at least three times in subsequent interviews he has given about the encounter. what i remember about this encounter with alexander downer he was incredibly belligerent, despised trump -- >> martha: let me just, basically, you're saying that once were you on the campaign, suddenly all of these people are giving you information. and now that you look back on it, you

that -- >> when the parliament refused to grant authority for participation to prime minister david cameroncy taking a vote, given what happened in the iraq war, i think that there was a reconsideration by some in the white house as to whether or not we weren't under an obligation to do the same. now, obviously, many of us had argued we needed to proceed forward. the president made a different decision. he made a decision he thought he had to go to congress because we would be stronger, because it was important to have congress buy in to the use of force, and you never know where that may take you. it was not the policy i thought we were about to put in, but the president made the decision and i understand the decision -- >> do you think it weakened us around the world? >> i think it wound up hurting us. even though we wound up actually achieving more -- >> understandable. >> through diplomat then we would have achieved simply by doing it. i suspect the president would acknowledge it, that whether we like it or not, there was a cost attached to that, and yes, it gained sort of a life of its

certainly neither david cameron nor theresa may have made any attempt to do that.he two names forward for the party then to vote on. if most of those members don't see theresa may as the leader coming to the next election, at what point did they see her going? certainly before the election. we don't know when that would be. we are assuming it runs full term. obviously, now isn't the time, the brexit negotiations have got to be completed. it would be crazy to start a leadership campaign in the middle of that. it would merely put the day of brexit off or cause more chaos than there is already. there is an airof chaos than there is already. there is an air of panic around in terms of what the country is doing. i think the answer is not yet. that potentially takes us to march next year. probably, yes. we shall see. thank you. and we'll find out how this story — and many others — are covered in tomorrow's front pages ff at 10:40 and 11:30pm this evening in the papers — our guests joining me tonight, are dawn foster, columnist at the guardian and the daily telegraph's de

steve was the director of strategy for prime minister david cameron and one of the most influential british conservatives advisors. since moving to the united states in 2012 he has taught at stanford university and found a political technology startup with a mission of fighting big-money in politics and putting power in peoples hands. he is the author of more human, designing the world where people come first, uk sunday times bestseller in 201560 start a politics flossie and economics at new college oxford university. he's been a prominent supporter of britain exit from the european union. i've had the pleasure speaking alongside on a number of brexit panels. his latest book is "positive populism: revolutionary ideas to rebuild economic security, family, and community in america." please join me in welcoming steve hilton. [applause] >> thank you very much thank you all for coming along. thanks for watching wherever you are. it's a great pleasure and an honor to be or another to mention the first amendment in person was the brexit discussion that we had. i think it was a few months before? >

david cameron said there would be world war iii.verybody lied, that isn't democracy. if you think that isn't democracy. if you think thatis that isn't democracy. if you think that is ok, you don't believe in democracy and what you believe in is brexit which is ridiculous. we have to have a fair, free and open vote now in what the dealers. let's find out what no deal means. experts will run the world are telling us this is what happens under wto or you stay in the eu. or you have theresa may's checkers deal. what that unable us to trade freely? that is off the table. the any people talk about checkers are in westminster. in brussels and everywhere asked the looking at this and say, were trinket—mac what are they playing at? the deal that everybody in the world is expecting to happen and the one we said we would do consists of securing the rights of citizens in the eu and the uk, second point was the eu and the uk, second point was the financial settlement, and the third point was the order on the island of ireland. getting a permanen