alan dershowitz, we appreciate the time. us. >>> after the break, the media spent months debating the climate and corporate tax bill and now barely seem to kill. what's up with that? peter doocy is standing by. ♪ ♪♪ i got into debt in college and, no matter how much i paid, it followed me everywhere. between the high interest, the fees... i felt trapped. debt, debt, debt. so i broke up with my credit card debt and consolidated it into a low-rate personal loan from sofi. i finally feel like a grown-up. break up with bad credit card debt. get a personal loan with no fees, low fixed rates, and borrow up to $100k. go to sofi.com to view your rate. sofi. get your money right. ♪♪ >> tech: cracked windshield? don't wait. sofi. get your money right. go to safelite.com you can schedule service in just a few clicks. it's so easy. and more customers today are relying on their cars advanced safety features, like automatic emergency breaking and lane departure warning. that's why our recalibration service is state of the art. we recalibr

i am back with alan dershowitz.omething you just said because you said joe biden was moderate, you said he's passed some good things, you said he did a good job in ukraine. i don't know what you're talking about. this is not a moderate president, okay? we have another spending bill that they're negotiating right now which will likely stoke inflation, and on ukraine he offered zelenskyy a flight out of there, you know, on week one so that russia would just take over, so i don't know what you're talking about in terms of joe biden being moderate, alan. >> compared to who? i mean, compared to president trump, who i did not vote for. i defended him against an unconstitutional impeachment, but i didn't vote for him. compared to president trump, president, current president, biden, is a moderate. so is his attorney general -- maria: no, he's not a moderate. he's not a moderate. it's just not true, and i know that's the line the democrats have been trying to sell us since day one during the campaign. but his actions and hi

trump's legal team pointed that out. >> sean: let me go to professor dershowitz. john solomon's report. that is that the biden white house knew a lot more than what they told us they knew. that's number one. in the court filing and the analysis of gregg jarrett. do you agree? do you disagree? where do you think that's going to take us? >> these are very, very serious matters. the whole issue of whether or not there was full disclosure to the magistrate hopefully will come out when we see the affidavit. there should be a special master appointed. this has happened in the past. special master, former judge can go through all the papers in design was privileged. the one thing that clearly is wrong is the biden white house should not be able to waive the executive privilege of president trump. that would make the executive privilege a nullity. it would mean no president could ever speak to anyone in confidence without knowing that two years from now or three years from now all of it will be revealed by the current president. that's just not the way executive privilege

gregg jarrett, alan dershowitz join us with the latest coming up next. ♪ ♪ demands a lotion this pureld bond pure moisture lotion 24-hour hydration no parabens, dyes, or fragrances gold bond champion your skin ♪ ♪ >> pete: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity." it tonight, it's good to be a biden in the washington swamp. of fbi whistle-blowers are telling senator ron johnson of wisconsin that high-ranking officials inside the bureau prohibited agents from investigating hunter biden and his laptop from heck. they could not investigate and were told until after the 2020 election. that's not all, according to mark zuckerberg, the fbi contacted facebook in 2020 and warned of russia propaganda. just as the hunter biden laptop story emerged. watch. >> there was a lot of attention on twitter during the election because of the hunter biden laptop story. you guys center that as well? >> we took a different path than twitter. basically the background is the fbi came to us and some folks on our team saying, hey, as you know, you should be on high alert that we thought there was a lot

more on this with professor dershowitz in a moment. federal agents took approximately 20 boxes of papers and photos and notes about roger stone, the president of fans. no mention of nuclear weapons. if it's not there, i'm sure they'll find it in one of their own desks. the former president did not oppose the release of the property release or the fbi's warrant on truth social. just the opposite. he said release the documents now. he continued "not only will i not oppose the release of documents related to the un-american, unwarranted, unnecessary raid and break-in of my home in palm beach, florida, i'm go ago step further by encouraging the immediate release of these documents. donald trump has nothing to hide because they did nothing wrong. he's materials were seized by the feds where they from trump's time in the white house, packed up by government staffers and delivered to his office. no different than any other president before him, obama, bush, clinton all took documents. clinton took furniture and other things. all presidents, t

we'll have more on this with professor dershowitz in a moment. and according to the propertya receipt, federal agents took what, approximately 20 boxes ofx papers, photos, handwritten notes about roger stone material about the president of france. other documents, no mention of nuclear weapons. but if it's not there, i'm sure the magically find it inn one of their own desks. now, keep in mindf the former president did notot oppose o the release of the property receipt or the fbi's warrant. on truth social just the opposite. he said t release the documentso now. continued, quote, notme only will i not oppose the release of documents related to the unamhe, an unwarranted, unnecessary raid un in palminto my home beach, florida, mar a lago. i'm going a step furthero by encourage a the immediate release of these documents. donald trump has nothing toy hide because he did nothing wrong. these materials were seized by the feds.s they were from trump's time in the white house. they were packed up by government staffers. they were delivered to trump's y p

and i think alan dershowitz, a professor, was 100%, right. if they don't have a smoking under it that the president was about to destroy documents, this raid is going tots be laughed off in next year.ye when republicans get control, we're going to findnt just how political the fbi was on this. oh, i think i we'll find out before then. t i think we'll know by november for sure. the american people deserve to know, john solomon, as always, thank you. all right. take a look at your screen. we just got this in video of the raid this morning on mar a lago. you can see it right there. cars coming inng i looks like dk at night again early in. the morning. but that's the only footage we have as of now. here with more reaction is fox newsut contributor, formerou speaker of the house newt gingrich. i think you remember the sandy arberger incident. he nat went into the national archives and came out with those documents in hisoc pants and his socks and anywhere he can stick them . look, there's clearly a double standard. but i think what's even more tro

i think alan dershowitz cover that perfectly.rd, and this is very important for people to understand, this comes less than a week after the judicial watch filed a lawsuit against the fbi saying those declassified documents the president trump has at the national archives, that the fbi still has, that have never been released until they were ordered released, tom sued them today. today they announced they suited to free those documents buried all those things of the backdrop. and here's the final piece. the washington field office is the office of the dash office that the agents came from to do this today. that is the same office that one week ago today, exactly one week ago today, senator chuck grassley divulged their whistle-blowers saying that specific office and its assistant special agent in charge engaged in political tampering and investigations. in fact opened one investigation against donald trump without a predicate, tried to close down one investigation against hunter biden. the fbi removed the special agent in charge.

joining us now, fox news legal analyst greg jarret, harvard law professor alan dershowitz. greg, let me start with you. you have a column out. you've read the entire by the way, there's professor dershowitz. his book, the price of principle. but you you read the filing of the trump team today and you raise four big questions. i want to go through them for our audience. ti inon addition to asking for a special master, a neutral independent to step in and review these documents and returntefa those that they illegally seize, they also make for important constitutional arguments. this is the twenty one page court filing in the southern district. number one , they raised the question did the fbi and thee department of justice lie to the magistrate in order to gain the warren? y did they omit exculpatory evidence that trump is actually cooperating? and that was vital information for the magistrate? no towo, do the fbi disclose a pretextual reason or a dual purpose ulterior motive related tor january 6 so that this wasis simply a charade over documentsw ? number three , they argu

pr professor dershowitz, greg jarrett, thank you very much. all right. straight ahead, our owad, nour sara carter's exclusive investigation of the dangers ofc human trafficking as the bidenki border crisis continues. she joins us along with buck sexton. when we return. home home, something to be proud of. home safe comfort where the production family home. i was deployed to afghanistan. i was on patrol march twenty six twelve, ten during a dismounted patrol. i happened to step in the wrong spot and took a sniper round into the chest. this is the date i was i lost my legs almost immediately. i lost my left hand and both my legs above the knee. my arm was gone so i closed my eyes thinking to myself, if i just keep breathing, i will make it home to my wife. i just want to serve my country every day still adapting to this new life. it was hard having everybody change your lifestyle to take care of me. a typical home doesn't feel like home to me. they have to carry my chair up the stairs. the hardest thing in my life is to call nail's my children to help pick

professor dershowitz, and gregg jarrett. coming up, the doj is doing damage control over the tactics they used in peter navarro's arrests. we will tell you the updated peter will join us. also, paul manafort will react as he releases his book, "political prisoner today." straight ahead. ♪ ♪ this isn't just freight. these aren't just shipments. they're promises. promises of all shapes and sizes. each, with a time and a place they've been promised to be. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you. ♪ ♪ >> sean: on other day with yet another example of our two-tiered justice system. you know, we don't have equal justice or application of our laws any longer. get this, the biden doj is now claiming the heavy-handed arrest tactics used against peter navarro back in june at an airport or completely reasonable and appropriate, calling him a "on particular subject." remember, peter navarro was arrested while getting on an airplane, put in handcuffs. he was then taken, strip-searched, put in leg irons

my question is, does director wray have to go, alan dershowitz?at mean that the department of justice, under merrick garland, that he has to be impeached? he has to be removed? he has politicized the department of justice and it can't be trusted? >> the first step is to have judicial oversight. that's why the judge's decision tomorrow to appoint an independent monitor instead of a taint team is a good first step. >> sean: they already read it. it's too late. >> it's not too late. >> sean: they have it, they read it. >> the independent examiner can at least pinpoint what has been read. i don't trust the fbi, i don't trust the department of justice to make honest assessments as to what was read and what was privileged. we need oversight. >> sean: professor we're losing you, every other word is all we're picking up. thank you professor, congressman jordan weal' stay on the story with you. >>> coming up after promising to be a great june firing biden has doing nothing to divide the country. wait until you hear the latest insult about well pretty much

p alan dershowitz, let mrincipe be with you, congressman. t so we protect unabiding.h.we give special treatment to a hillary clinton. trump gets lies told about him in dossie. him he gets fisa warrants, it gets against him and he gets his home raided.e is there bias in the fbi? yo as i understand it, you have five fbi informants that have come to you that want toblow be whistleblowers, correct? an whistleblowers, correct? we've had more than that.ight, r grassley said there'that.ight, r infl senator grassley said there is political influence at the fbi and it's alls that is aboute whis politics. t that is certainly the casean because all these whistleblowers come to us and talkd ta polit about the politil pressure they're under. and now we see thandert it maybe be in the inspector general'sce. office by statute, the inspector general is supposed to provide independent oversight ofus the justice department. well, how can you do that?tice se investigation and understand what happened herederstand? we' the fbi came to the inspector general and said we're going to we're goi

is now, professor dershowitz, n a lot of cases in your time.cases in >> what do you make of this of h this situationis? d >>is well, i disagree with youru two previous speakers. t reinhardt did the right thing by signing the search warrant. every single judge and magistrate in the unitedus states would have found probable cause based on this affidavit. they may hav thie narrowed the search somewhat, but there is absolutely no doubt there was probable cause. that's number one . number two , the real problem is the professor.m >> hold on a second, professor . . second, i want to ask youk a question there. sure. a tionjudge recused himself leso two months later on a caser on a on donald trump. how does he turn around rul and goes and says, yeah, i can make a ruling on this? every judge would have made the same ruling. so it's no harm, nno harm,o fou the problem was notm was with rhinehart. it wasnowith with the attorney general who didn't follow hiso own guidelinesnot . er hav a search warrant requested herea . there was a subpoena issued.d ad and

thank you both, professor dershowitz, and great job. coming up, the doj is doing damage control over the tactics they used in peter navarros arrest. we'll tell you the update and peter will join us . also, paul will react as he releases his book political prisoner today. straight ahead, when your small business finance, you need a fast, secure way to get the right loan at the right time. we're smart. this loan rated the number one online marketplace for sba loans. we'll help you free qualify for both low cost sba loans and affordable fixed rate term through our bank partners, all with one easy application. it was way easier, way faster and at the end we got the money to go to smart move loans .com. today apply now attention. did you serve live with your family or work at the marine corps base camp lejeune in north carolina? at any point between 1953 and nineteen eighty seven continue at camp lejeune has been linked to serious health problems including cancer, neurological diseases, reproductive diseases ,birth defects, miscarriages and

i want to play the sound from alan dershowitz, not someone who's known for his integrity in the faces could be a bit of a ramp -- will play this, and get your reaction on the other side. >> the idea of trying to blame a judge is ridiculous. any judge would have found probable cause. the question isn't whether there is probable cause, the question is should they have sought a warrant, or should they have gone by subpoena? the fact that there were 100 or so documents, some of them are classified, that's probable cause. probable cause doesn't have to be today or yesterday. it can be based on material that was seized sometime ago if there's evidence that nothing has changed. >> elie, it looks like he's not allen dershowitz, hello can you go at this point? is donald trump going to have to rely on a -- out of last school in order to defend him? it looks like his public legal defenders are backing out at this point. >> i don't think we're giving professor dershowitz enough credit -- that's just how that man rolls. the reason why there are people who are backing off of trump's that very seri

harvard law professor alan dershowitz along with former u.s. attorney brett tolman and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. thank you for joining us. you are a former u.s. attorney. i will start with you. i cannot get past the fact that a judge less than two months ago had to recuse themselves. we don't know why, but had to recuse himself from a trump issue and less than two months later he is making this ruling. i don't get how that happens in today's legal system. cino jason, if the recusal came as a result of the political connection between this judge and hillary clinton, which most likely it was, then it really is outrageous that he would not recuse himself when the main political adversary of hillary clinton, obama and biden and anyone on the left as former president donald trump you would have thought it would have applied also in this circumstance especially in the criminal law when there's a lot more on the line. >> craig, i love the piece you wrote on fox news.com, but essentially they were giving a fishing license to go to town on d

alan dershowitz told us, for our story, that the president, you may remember, alan dershowitz is a fan of donald trump's, he has said the president needs a top flight lawyer stat. and he should have had one for months, somebody who is nationally known, who has a track record of success, because right now, the president is facing legal jeopardy on at least four fronts as you perfectly summed up at the top of your show, and this one in mar-a-lago is on the front burner, but it is not the only problem that former president trump faces. >> i mean also, if you're a top flight legal mind, you might also look to see how other fellow top flight legal minds have faired working for donald trump. i mean ty cobb, a former lawyer for the president, now tweets about how much he hates donald trump. don mcgahn, was a star witness for the mueller investigation, pat sinema, and pat philbin, they're cooperating with the d.o.j.'s investigation. these are not people who are pledging fealty to donald trump and probably for good reason and i'm sure those are all data points that act as deterrents for other l

the author of "price and principle" alan dershowitz along with the attorney for former president trump allina hub is with us and cohost of "the five geraldo rivera, let's talk about the same issues we are brought up with jonathan turley. as it relates to sending it back to the doj, they get to write -- they get to redact whatever they want out of it and i am pretty certain it's not going to come back favorable in any way to the site of transparency. >> i agree with you. i think that there won't be very much transparency. i would expect it will get a lot of black ink all over that piece of paper in terms of the doj, doug jill biden doj will probably redact everything other than the word "an end the." the one thing that to the judge did say was that he will take a look at if it is too heavily redacted he will do so himself. so he is encouraging them to try to give us some sort of priority. i think that there are a lot of people here that are just waiting including the trauma team to see what the basis was when you have a coordinating president. i mean any person, let alone a president. i

cruz, lee zelman, white house senior advisor stephen miller and the price of principal author alan dershowitz am. fox business starts from 6:00 tonight a caucasian for "mornings with maria" on fox business, start your week with us and your day every morning on fox business, that will do it for us, thank you for lllllt time. gerry: hello. this week on the "wall street journal at large," nancy pelosi defies china and pays a visit to taiwan. is this bold leadership and defensive freedom or reigns leadings kick that could rebound on the u.s.? job growth in july and democrats are set on hitting the economy on massive new tax in spending bill and arizona to michigan, republican voters endorsed-backed candidates and

. >> david, this might be a surprise revelation to some, alan dershowitz says there is enough evidence donald trump. listen to this. >> there is enough evidence here to indict trump. but trump will not be indicted, in my view, because the evidence doesn't have what i call the nixon clinton standards. >> >> so dershowitz we should note defended trump in his first impeachment trial, but if he is saying this now, how bad is this for trump? even if it's just not from a legal point of view, but from a public relations standpoint to go on fox and say that there is enough there to indict trump? >> again, it shows this political shift away from trump. the fatigue that i mentioned earlier, the exhaustion from all this drama. and a critical thing here, and asha just talked about this, if they use this assessment in the intelligence community, and they found that those was real harm, that this intelligence did go to a foreign country, that's a critical part in the decision by merrick garland whether or not to prosecute trump. it's a document -- the defense for trump would be hey, the documents si

. >> i look as a trial attorney and alan dershowitz speaking and thinking how he would be cross-examined and he ended talking about how partisan the proceedings have been to date. that shows he's walking into this with a political opinion. >> that's what he told us right here on "the beat." now, today findling is not analyzing trump lawyers. he is one, and a long time civil rights advocate, also been publicly critical of donald trump. he called him a "racist" and labeled him "pathetic" once again. so there is a lot here apart from the rap overlap, and we are learning that whatever else you think here is going on, donald trump or someone close to him who can affect his decision-making knows the difference between the search in florida and the potential indictment in georgia. knows the difference between some of what's going on in new york, which is serious but may not reach him personally and what apparently requires one of the type of, and they say this as a compliment in the bar, one of the type of "legal killers" you need to deal with real cases and real prison time against that d.a. a

and the price of principal author alan dershowitz, my special guest sunday at 10 am. fox business starts from 6:00 tonight a caucasian for "mornings with maria" on fox business, start your week with us and your day every morning on fox business, that will do it for us, thank you for joining become have a great rest of the weekend, see you again next time. time. gerry: hello. this week on the "wall street journal at large," nancy pelosi defies china and pays a visit to taiwan. is this bold leadership and defensive freedom or reigns leadings kick that could rebound on the u.s.? job growth in july and democrats are set on hitting the economy on massive new tax in spending bill and arizona to michigan, republican voters endorsed-backed candidates and signal of ascendant populous gop or could it spell trouble for the party in november? plus candidates vote to -- canada votes to keep women's rights to abortions. did the fbi protect hunter biden from investigation over his foreign influence pedaling. that's under fire this week. we'll discuss all this and more with our guest

or now with more, the author of the price of principle, harvard law professor alan dershowitz, along with the attorney for former president donald ilina harbor is with us anden the co-host of the five geraldo rivera. let me start with you as the president's attorney. let's talk specifically aboute the very same issues that were j brought up with jonathan turley as it relates to send it back to the doj. they get it right.er they get to redact whatever they want out of it. i'm pretty certain it's not going to come back favorable in any way to transfer to the side of transparency. i agree with you. i think that there won'tve be very much transparency. i would expect that we'll get a lot of black ink all overof that piece of p paper. if i was the doj, abidin doj, ly i'd probably be redacting everything other than the word and o the so we're going to have to see what they kick back the one good thing that this judge did say is that heil will take a look at if it's too heavily redacted, he will do so himselfi . sosng he's encouraging them to y and give us some sort of clarity. i thinkomio

allen dershowitz. are you shocked how he's still the number one story on the other networks?e hard left will do anything to get trump. they will trash the constitution, they will trash civil liberties. they will contradict things they said for 100 years. the espionage act of 1917, the left hates it except when it's against trump. the hard left put trump in the news, but the big victim is the constitution of the united states. brian: we are about to walk in and sign on without senate approval to a terrible iran deal. even worse than the won from the bawm -- worse than the one from the obama administration. >> i'm going to try to head up the legal team to challenge whether the iran deal is a treaty. it is a treaty. why doesn't it require the consents of 2/3 of the senate? there will be a legal challenge to that executive agreement which isn't an agreement. terrible deal that essentially guarantees that some day soon there will be a nuclear armed iraq. brian: professor, the president said there will not be a nuclear armed iran in israel. does that matter. >> it doesn't matter wh

alan dershowitz will be on. newt gingrich a best-selling book. follow one nation, and fall me on twitter, facebook. dan bongino starts right now. dan: fox news learned from lawyers that trump's lawyers certified there were no classified documents at mar-a-lago. i will give you my game plan how conservatives can clean house and salvage what is left of our broken republic. is the left trying to frame trump again?

alan dershowitz will be on. newt gingrich a best-selling book.and fall me on twitter, ♪ [playing of "the star-spangled banner"] ♪.

. >> the law professor alan dershowitz said the doj could exonerate itself by instilling the affidavittch. >> why was it necessary? why eight months later? why after giving subpoenas? why wait three days over the weekend after you have gotten a search warrant? these are the questions that the affidavit may very well answer. look, i believe presumption of innocence including garland. i want to presume he did the right thing, but the affidavit is the central clue point. >> meanwhile, trump said they returned to his passports seizedduring the raid. donald report of the fbi never took them. he writes the doj and fbi just returned my passports. when they raided my home in morrow local eight days ago and opened their arms and grabbed everything in sight much a common criminal would do and anr post, trump said he had security footage of the raid and that the cameras must be turned off,. >> todd: katie pavlik said the american people deserve more transparency than what they are getting, listen. >> the problem is donald trump donald trump isn't trying to defend his innocence and pitted guilty b

january 6th, hunter biden, merrick garland and two systems of justice with harvard law professor alan dershowitzing up right here. it's all right here, right now on "sunday morning futures." ♪ ♪ maria: but first this morning, breaking news in washington. the democrats are this close to getting their climate change agenda passed with with senators up all night in the so-called voterama this morning where senators are offering amendments to elements of biden's build back better agenda that had been stalled for a year. the senate voting 51-50 last night to move the bill forward with vice president kamala harris to decide -- the deciding vote to pass the package, largely to pay for obamacare subsidies and climate change new rules. texas senator ted cruz is on judiciary committee. he voted against this bill, and he joins me now with the very latest. senator, thanks very much for being here morning. >> well, good morning, maria. good to be with you. maria: can you tell the us about the amendments and the happenings right now in the senate? will bill pass? >> well, sure. we've been up all night, voting

. >> the one person who has the courage to show his face with alan dershowitz mr. i kept my shorts on. [laughter] and he also says bernie sandersa is anti-semitic and i love bernie i think he is the hope we had a hope for a political sanity it would be bernie sanders i rely on our music the spirituals the ones that say bthat i've been scorned and be and there's other songs like should revive and that's wire ancestors created them. i think the people who find themselves wondering through this book will also see the colonel's of faithfulness. i'm not talking about religiosity but there is a kernel of faith for this in the work that you have done journaling and creating and i want to in the conversation with this question about faithfulness and revolution and revolutionary community and organization versus this motion, the idea of hope, how do you understand those two as a radical faith but also the radical hope those of the same things to you? >> lucky for me i lived in an era where i have seen and met true revolutionaries. people who knew the bullet wase around the

and dershowitz predicted the us supreme court would take up and donald trump would win. he was wrong but it does show you there was something there. wisconsin supreme court voted 43 on procedural grounds but the chief justice of wisconsin supreme court filed a dissent and said among other things these lockboxes were illegal and since then the supreme court in wisconsin have rules going itforward these drop boxes to be illegal. so there was merit in all these lawsuits donald trump filed and all he did was hire lawyers like johnny england, a friend of mine and rudy giuliani to make legal arguments is what the democrats did and there's nothing wrong with hiring a lawyer and making legal arguments so this isn't about donald trump orchestrating an insurrection. incredibly unfair and on that day he said i want you to go in patriotically and peacefully make your voices heard. what part of patriotically and peacefully to understand what they talk about he said fine, fight. take back america, fight to save the country. people say that stuff all the time and donald trump on that d

all this as his former attorney alan dershowitz predicting -- >> trump will not be indicted in my viewcause the evidence doesn't pass the nixon/clinton standard. >> reporter: the next hearing for that special master is scheduled for thursday. the judge was clear she hasn't made a final decision on the matter and asked the justice department to provide a detailed inventory of everything they seized and how they used the filter team to review the document. willie? >> monica alba starting us off at the white house. thank you so much. chuck todd is nbc's political director and moderator of "meet the press." i've been talking to legal analysts and prosecutors who say under any other circumstances, just based on what we know publicly, you could indict former president trump. of course, this is no order that case. how much pressure is on the attorney general merrick garland right now, and do you think he will indict a former president this >> look, i think the problem is, we don't know if he's going to do that. but the most striking thing is the fact that if they already wanted to, they have

all this, as his former attorney, alan dershowitz, suggest there may be enough evidence to indict mr.. but predicting -- >> trump will not be indicted, in my view, because the evidence doesn't pass what i called the nixon, clinton standard. >> the next hearing for the special master is scheduled for thursday. and the judge was clear, she hasn't made a final decision on the matter. she also asked the justice department to provide under seal a detailed inventory of everything they seized and how they used the filter team to review the documents. back to you. >> all right, monica alba, thank you for that. joining me right now, congressman ted lieu, democrat from california and member of the judiciary and foreign affairs committees. he's also former member of the u.s. air force judge advocate general corps. that is also known as jag. thanks for being here. first, all let's get to how you interpret the inclination to appoint a special master. is there a political calculation at play in that? do you think it might slow the fbi investigation? >> thank you, alex, for your question. i had a se

heard from numerous people inside the trump world and some people on the record, former ally alan dershowitz, for example, saying the trump team and the former president really should have had a leading star power white collar defense lawyer before this moment. they have known for months now that this was brewing, and there will be more to tell about that, but they've known for months in mar-a-lago that the fbi was interested in this information and that the president, the former president, was resisting turning it over. so it's not like this should have caught them by surprise, that they were going to need lawyers. and there are so many areas where donald trump is exposed in the sense of being a subject of an investigation. let's not even stop with mar-a-lago. let's begin with january 6th and the active criminal investigation that the former president and his allies' role in spreading a lie and essentially defrauding the u.s. government. >> you say more to tell, that is definitely the case here. carol leonnig and julia ainsley, thank you. >>> ahead, women veterans say the va health clinics

the one person to show face with ellen dershowitz. mr. i kept my shorts on. [laughter] he said bernie sanders is anti-semitic the i love bernie. some kind of political sanity, it would be bernie sanders. i really rely on our music, the spiritual been talked about, since you were born. that's why our ancestors created them. >> i think the people find themselves wondering through this book will also see kernels of faith on this and not talking about religiosity right now but there's faithfulness in the work you've done, journaling and also creating i wanted to and with this a question about faithfulns in revolutionary and organization versus this idea of hope. how do you understand those two? he radical faith if that exists versus what people might call radical hope. were those the same things to you? >> lucky for me i've lived in an era when i've seen and sometimes met true evolutionary. people k who knew the bullet was around the corner, they were going to gon around the corner but it is incredible when you meet people willing to give everything they have for

one person who believes that, alex dershowitz, a member of trump's own legal team in his first impeachment is enough for an indictment, but there will not be indictment and should not be an indictment based on what we have seen up to. now once it is unredacted, maybe we will have to change our minds. >> i disagree with torturous that there should be an indictment there, but despite his claim that is not going to happen, he does think there is enough to invite indict donald trump. we are the timeline there? the garland have charges now for -- down the line. then there are the challenges that gary grumbach explained. earlier -- saying she will assess the documents seized in mar-a-lago. and the judge late last night singled their support for trump's special master to oversee the review of those documents. i'm glad to walk to my panel this morning talk about this imbricate down. peter strzok is the former fbi counterintelligence agent, and -- is a former united states attorney appointed by former president george w. bush. peter, paul, nice to have you guys here this morning. first question i'm

interest in understanding exactly what happened here, legal expert in civil rights attorney alan dershowitzs saying there are many questions that have to be answered, take a listen. >> why is it necessary, why eight months, why after giving subpoenas and wait three days over the weekend after you've gotten the search warrant, these are the questions that the affidavit may very well answer. >> alan dershowitz says it's going to be hard for the government to prove that donald trump was wrong they have to prove intent and willfulness. he says negligence is not enough, that is not enough to bring the case to a conclusion and he says the investigation into hillary clinton but again we will find out tomorrow only tomorrow afternoon, i think the betting money is on a heavily rejected affidavit that will be released. we will see. stuart: thank you very much indeed, back to you later, congressman mike waltz from the great state of florida. mike waltz. at they don't unseal the affidavit, if we cannot get to find out what really happened, then what happens, what's next. >> first i just want to join th

i don't know if you saw alan dershowitz wrote a piece in the "wall street journal" about what aboutism, people mock it. but i think the key hoar, this was part of his article, the key is when we have the attorney general saying it this reflects the equal application of the law, same thing he said in the bannon case, it really doesn't. we haven't treated everyone similarly situated the same. i think especially when it comes to a public figure like the president of the united states or former president of the united states, there are a number of factors that have to be considered. people get upset when they say there could be a revolution, there could be a civil war and so on. you have to take into account public sentiment. right now there is -- half of the nation doesn't trust the government, our government. we have to get past that. we have to -- again, this is, i think, a function of transparency to some degree, but there have been some very bad moves. you have in the justice department now number two in charge who is an andrew wise man accolade, lisa monaco, people don't know what's