and attorney alan dershowitz on the strengths and weaknesses of the case.rump's scripted and somewhat subdued speech hit many targets, and there was, not surprisingly, a deep divide among the anchors and commentators. >> the most evil and heinous abuse of power in the history of our country, very sad thing to watch, a rut sitting president had his top political opponent arrested on fake and fabricated charges. it's a political persecution like something straight out of a fascist or a communist nation. this day will go down in infamy. the prosecutor in the case, i will call our case, is a thug. i've named him deranged jack smith. >> i think we all have to be cognizant of every minute of every event that happens is how he's distorting and programming this to his base. >> now, despite all the naysayers, his support is still very strong and perhaps,es this is unprecedented among modern political figures, but instead of asking why that might be, our sneer being and vindictive press corps, they're just out for blood. >> you will notice of all of the noise out the

attorney general matthew whitaker and harvard law professor if i emeritus alan dershowitz. for being here. >> thank you. maria: alan, you are the author of the book "get trump," available now. your reaction to the doj getting trump. >> well, i predicted it. if you put aside all your resources and do what justice jackson warned about about 80 years ago where he said it's a question of picking the man and then searching the law books or putting investigators to work to pin some offense on, that's what they did. and jack smith is wrong when he said there's one set of laws. he was assigned only one job, to get trump. so here's the legal issue. let's assume, let's assume hypothetically that a democrat prosecutor announces in advance i'm only going to investigate republicans. and then the investigation produces some evidence of crime. is that acceptable in america? if the same investigation done against democrats or done against someone else would also have produced crimes. is it legal, is it justifiable? put it for a moment in the context of race in the south. what if a southern

professor dershowitz, thank you as well. >>> coming up the house voted as professor dershowitz said to send biden to the committee. congresswoman lauren boebert who introduced those articles will join us. also we will find out what the spat with marjorie taylor greene is all about and we will show you highlights of adam schiff's softball interview on the hit show the view. tomi lahren will react, straight ahead. bass pro shops and cabela's stands tall in our unwavering commitment to honoring our heroes. we extend our gratitude ...beyond words... by proudly offering a legendary salute discount to those who protect our freedoms. our dedication to those who selflessly serve us runs deep within our dna. it's not just a discount... it's a commitment to making a difference. because every day is a chance for us to say thank you. bass pro shops and cabela's... your adventure starts here. ♪ the thought of getting screened ♪ ♪ for colon cancer made me queasy. ♪ ♪ but now i've found a way that's right for me. ♪ ♪ feels more easy. ♪ ♪ my doc and i agreed. ♪ ♪ i pick the time. ♪ ♪ today's a good da

i listened to your interview earlier with professor dershowitz.ing about criminalizing civil behavior. when the democrats talk about and come to power, they only know one speed and it's abuse of power, whether it's nancy pelosi, now it's merrick garland under joe biden as well and the inequities here, the fact that we have a two-tiered justice system, we hear about that all the time but so many people have been exonerated or relieved including by the way president obama apparently has classified documents in some kind of storage container up in chicago that nobody's too concerned about. and others have mistakenly taken documents so we heard. but this constant weaponization of anything that president trump does is election interference because he is leading in the polls and the democrats are terrified of having president trump come to power again so they're doing anything and everything they can to weaponize our most powerful arms of government to try to take him down and that's what should be most concerning to republicans and democrats and i disa

greg jarrett, thank you, professor dershowitz. great. , thank k you as well. coming up, the house voted as professor dershowitz made sure to send articles of impeachment against biden to the committee co >> congresswoman lauren boebert, who introduced those articlesn lauren boe, wil. also, we'll find out what the spat with marjorie taylor greenspat wite is all ab. and we'll show you highlights of adam schiff softball interview on that hit news show the view. and tomi lahren will react straight. eels m the thought of getting screened the thought of getting screened for colon cancer made me queasor . but now i've found a way that's right for me. right for me. feelgoay. ♪ >> my doc and i agreed.in today's a good day. today's a good day. i screened with guard and didan iterage ri way. and n >> cologuard is a one of a kindg way to screen for colon cancer . that's effective and noninvasive is for people 45 plus at average risk, not high risk. >> false positive or negative results may occur. ask your provider for cologuard. i did it my way. they've been after trump f

professor dershowitz if all this turns out to be true, would the republicans be right to impeach merrick garland? >> that's a hard sell because impeachment requires a crime. it requires perjury and perjury requires expect intent. i would rather move to try to find out the truth first, rather than trying to prosecute people. >> merrick garland said he had authority that he knew he didn't have and wouldn't give him the authority the special counsel status he asked for, is that enough to raise the bar for you? >> i think so. because he has the authority. garland has the authority. >> exactly. and he claimed that he had more power as, you know, as an attorney. that's not true. >> but there may have been underlings that under cut his views. i'm not prepared to go to percentage perry. i'm prepared to say we must have hearings and you can't allowed this plea bargain to go forward. >> i got to roll. if that's true should he be impeached? last word, greg jarrett. >> if he knowingly intentionally lied then garland should be impeached because perjury would constitute a high crime and misdemeanor. >

alan dershowitz, thank you, greg. oppoay k you. now, by the way, now to some shocking news last night. let's seco intellicommune, const of all theorists, rachel maddow said something true on our show. take pause and note. >> you have to wonder if the justice department is consideringg true o whether e is some political solution to this criminal problem, whether part of the issue here is not just that trump has committed crimes, but that trump has committed crimes crd plans on back in the white house. do they consider as part oiminal a potential plea offer something that would prescribe e him from from white from running for office again? i don't know. again?n't knowi would imagine g like that happened, that it would have to come fromwould the defense side of the negotiation that o come f they thaty the trump team would would say, oh, by the way, and with we will also, you know, drop out of the the race president. otherwise it would put the justice department in this position that donaldt donald trump claims there and he claims they

thank you, alan dershowitz, thank you. here with more trump attorney tacopina. >> we're talking a lot about unequal justice under the law, lack of equal justice, equal application. if these cases are are not related in so they are related in so many different ways. nobody wants to talk about it, though, joe. nobody in the media wants to admit it. they don't even want to acknowledge that they lied to the american people with conspiracy theories for three years and got away with it. >> it's all like, oh, okay. >> we'll move on to the next thing. it's it's missing from what you just did there, that that little monologue and that that series of clips you put together was so powerful. so powerful. opening statement as to why there at least should be parallel investigations. i mean, they're spending all this time of dollars, hundreds of prosecutors investigating, donald trump, anything. >> donald trump, you know, find a target and then go seek the crime. not the way it's supposed to be in this country. you have apparently real e

harvard law professor alan dershowitz. matt, let me start with you. a cataclysmic event for joe biden? explain. >> this is a game changer. right now we have only seen the smoke. there is a lot of folks that believe joe biden and his entire family have profited immensely from the public service. this would be concrete evidence that would point to actual brya berry, actual payments from foreign governments to affect u.s. policy. that to me is an absolute game changer, sean. >> let me ask you professor dershowitz, you had said that the republicans probably now have every right and obligation open on impeachment hearing about this. now we know the fbi director has not been cooperating with james calmer's committee. we know now that he selectively redacted information that was pertinent and key especially mentioning the possibility that there are 17 tapes held by a barisma executive, 15 with hunter, two would joe biden, as an insurance policy should something go wrong. i don't think he would hold onto tapes unless they were incriminating, do you? >> of cou

>> all right, greg allen and alan dershowitz. thank you both. we check in with house oversight committee chairman james comer. the fbi director is now allowing his entire committee to few a document that includes allegations that president biden was involved in a bribery scheme with a foreign government. we now go to fox news correspondent kevin corke first. >> reporter: apparently we have james comer first. anyway, congressman calmer, thank you. let's talk about specifically you were just about to as of today or yesterday bring the director into contempt of congress. it became unnecessary because he finally gave in to your demand. my understanding is that this particular source that you cited in your original letter along with charles grassley is viewed as a very credible source. the allegation seems reel. they've had it since 2017. it deals specifically with the country ukraine and it talks about specific actions that joe biden might have taken in exchange for a lot of money. what specifically can you tell us? >> i can tell you that the fbi ha

greg jarrett and alank you dershowitz, thank you both. we now check in with house we c comer.ommittee chairmanbo colmer. he had a big win today. the fbi director, christophe i r ray, is now allowing his entirec committee to view a document that includes allegations that president biden was involved in a bribery with a foreignent. government. we know we now go to fox news correspondent kevin corke. >> firstcorke fi. apparently, we have james calling first. okay. anyway, anyway, congressman colmer, thank you. and you know, let's talk aboutpa specific lee. you know, you were just about to as of today or yesterday brig bring the director, director wray, into contempt of congress t co. . it became unnecessary because he finally gave in to your demand. r de now, my understanding is that this particulamand is thatr sout you cited in your original letter with charles grassley is viewed as a very credible source. the allegationas as seems real. they apparently have had it since 2017. it deals specifically with thecl country of ukraine, and it talk

and coming up tonight we will have full legal analysis from alan dershowitz, former acting attorney general matt whitaker and the former speaker of the house newt gingrich the house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan and my preview of my exclusive interview with the california governor gavin newsom coming up friday night but we begin with a statement that you hear a lot from the left. nobody is above the law. they say there is one set of rules for every american in fact the doj special counsel, jack smith who is prosecuting donald trump emphasize this with a press conference today unfortunately i am not buying it i will explain in a minute but take a look. >> have the fbi view the incident in which hillary clinton instructed jake sullivan to take the markings off of a document that was to be sent to her? >> we looked at that pretty closely. there was a problem with the secure fax machine and email which she says in substance, take the headers off of it and send it as a non-paper. >> we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone. >> there are hundreds of classified

maria: well, i spoke with harvard law professor alan deer dershowitz yesterday on sunday morning futuresent but it's the product of targeting and the question is can you prosecute somebody when you targeted that person and went through every hoop, dotted every i, crossed every t, gave lawyers immunity, violated the lawyer/client privilege in many respect and then came up with something, i don't know how the courts will look at that and trump's lucky, he got the case tried in palm beach county where he might get a more sympathetic jury and he got a good judge. maria: joining me is north carolina congressman, member of the house veterans affairs and house ways and means committee, greg murphy is here. it's good to see you. thanks very much for being here. what is your reaction to the trump indictment? >> i think it's a very troubling time for our country, maria. you know, alan dershowitz and even former attorney general barr said there are troubling things in these indictments. that said, where was the persecution of bill clinton when he perjuried himself, where was the persecution of hill

let me all right, professor dershowitz, let me get to you. in this case now, we have six people in real time taking contemporaneous notes. they are corroborating that the weiss is rightly complaining that he did not have the authority to follotyw on prosecutions or charges that he wanted to bring in the investigation. >> as it relates to hunter and joe bidehunter a bidenn, th authority that merrick garland said he had did not exisd t. im >> how important, how critical will the testimony oofthosf thoe six whistleblowers and their notes be in terms of ascertainingrtaining the truth e >> well, very important. and the judge who is sentencingu hunter biden and who hasnter d to approvehas the plea deal mu, must call garland, must call weiss, must call the sixbide witnesses and must say, look, hunter biden's we know you want the deal to go through the justice department. went know you want the deal to go through. >> but i'm a judge. i represent the people of the united of states of americ. i want to make sure fetzer standing, who's going to bring ow

i will go with alan dershowitz saying this does not meet the conviction criteria. he feels it is a very weak case. i am going to use the word vendetta by the democratic party, and it has twisted -- this whole thing was a law created to go after trump individually because he has been president and has access to everything, and to take that away from him and make it a crime is just pure politics. it is disgusting to see our system twisted like this. thank you for your information. i will not agree with all of it, but it certainly gives us a better outlook. c-span, thank you very much. host: tom in los angeles. mr. weinstein. guest: tom, look, we are all part of the system. that is what is the beauty of our system and country. we are entitled to have opposing viewpoints, and we are entitled to disagree about what the law is in the application of the law, and that is why we have judges. that is why they review the facts, they compare what is on the books, read the statutes and look at the intent behind them when they are drafted by the legislature, and we can agree to

their dershowitz and jonathan turley. so there's two of them. it's controlled by marxist, willfully disregard the marxist atrocities, failures of the past. democrats no longer the sovereign individual, the rule of law or the primary values of the constitution or equality of races, the spirit of compromise or the decentralization of power. instead democrats regard the constitution a white supremacist document written by rich white slave, designed to oppress all of the genders, races. its mentality is that of european fascism and soviet communism and its immediate goal is a one party state. this is actually a bad news. good news story. the bad news is that tremendous damage to our country was made possible because republicans and patria failed to address the threat when it could have been nipped in the bud. the good news is that we can take our country back if we are willing to fight for it. i came tonight ready to talk some of the themes of final battle. next election could be the last public debate about the 2020 election. i called public debate

. >> sean: that's why allen dershowitz witnesses said you are one of the best debateers students he ever had in his harvard law class but in all seriousness they have done everything they can do to obstruct james comer's investigation into the biden family. >> yes. >> sean: this is a witness that the fbi paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to in the past for intel. they've had this now for years. why have they sat on it? >> well, i believe because they're covering up. look, the fbi at that hearing yesterday, that deputy director, i asked him directly, did they have -- did the 1023 allege biden received a personal bribe of $5 million. he refused toens a. i asked will the fbi give the 1023 to the senate judiciary committee. he refused to answer. i asked him is it accurate there's 17 voice recordings of this burisma official 15 talking to hunter biden, two talking to joe biden? he refused to answer. i asked him does the fbi have those 17 voice recordings, he refused to answer. i asked him will the fbi give to the senate judiciary committee those 17 voice recordings so we can access oursel

>> look at someone like dershowitz who is not a republican but has pointed out it's probably a differentoncern. is everybody being treated fairly. that's what we want. justice should be blind. >> carley: on the other side you mentioned president biden and have you senator chuck grassley coming out and saying that the burisma executive who allegedly paid joe, then vice president joe biden hunter biden $5 million each has these 17 audio recordings, two of them with the president of the united states. if that's true, and these audio recordings exist, that could be pretty serious and now you are saying yesterday that you are going to make sure that they are made public. how are you going to do that? >> right now there is an investigation going on and jamie comer's committee has gotten a lot of that. senator grassley it's been amazing over the years. he has been a real defender of whistleblowers, whistleblower laws, protections. he has had people come to him and we have had people come to us exposing a lot of things we found out to be true. the fbi originally when jamie comer and grassley saw

if donald trump is convicted he can still run for office, but constitutional lawyer expert alan dershowitz what? the feds better have a strong case. take a listen. >> if this indictment is as weak as it appears to be from what has been disclosed so far, it may be the most dangerous indictment in political history. ashley: well, there you have it. now, donald trump is set to appear tuesday afternoon in a federal court house in miami, but it is a federal case so it will be behind closed doors, no cameras like the spectacle we saw during his manhattan appearance. it's unlike lip this case be resolved before this election that manhattan case is still to be decided and if trump does win the election, david, consider this. the whole thing goes away because he takes back control of the justice department. back to you. david: he can pardon himself, ashley, thank you very much. lina hobba, one of donald trump 's attorneys joins me. thank you for coming. this is all happening by the way the same week we're getting details of the alleged biden bribe. do you think that's just a coincidence? >> i don't

do you think the comments from a bill barr or alan dershowitz who was writing in an op ed about how strongase is here, those could actually begin to have some sway or at least encourage people to read the indictment for themselves? >> well, i -- i am not myself that intimately familiar with the psychology of all of the trump supporters. it's really hard for me to believe that among his most loyal supporters, there are a number, there are 20, 25, 30% who can be appealed to by reason. the idea that -- it seems to me a lot of them were very supportive of bill barr precisely because bill barr did the worst things in the world in order to support donald trump. well, here's this person who did those things and who was practically the hero of the trump supporters for many, many months as attorney general, here he is standing up and condemning donald trump for the acts that were done here. hard for me to believe that there aren't some marginal number, i don't know, again, what the percentage is, but it will be significant if 10 or 15 or 20% of trump supporters are influenced by this. the. >> we ha

news legal analyst gregg jarrett also best selling author of get trump harvard law professor allen dershowitz. professor, if this is true, in other words, that this indictment is coming, i'm going to bet every dollar that i have that this is not going to be an indictment about classified material. because the immediate comparisons will be about hillary clinton and the july 2016 press conference of jim comey. and he said no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute and she did have classified top secret information. we have no doubt joe biden had it at four separate locations as i recall, so make that comparison. so it seems to me that it won't be about classified documents, which means that, in the process of investing this, some process crime probably came up in their minds and they went forward with that. that's my guess. you're the legal professor, i'm not. >> you're a great guesser. a plus. in my book get trump i say exactly that, that they would not go after him on the possession of classified material but they would try to concoct some process scrim obstruction of justice. but let's remembe

i spoke with harvard law professor emeritus alan dershowitz yesterday to get his reafntle watch. >> ient than the bragg indictment but it's the product of targeting and the question is, can you prosecute somebody when you targeted that person and went through every hoop, dotted every i, crossed every t, gave lawyers immunity, violated the lawyer/client privilege in many respects and came up with something. i don't know how the courts will look at that. trump's lucky he got the case tried in palm beach county where he might get a more sympathetic jury and a good judge. maria: joining us now, florida attorney general, ashley moody. good to see you. >> great to be with you. maria: your thoughts on the indictment of donald trump. >> it is a speaking indictment, meaning they did lay out their case a little more than normal in federal charging documents. generally those indictments track the statutes. i think that was a must here. you have an american public who is thinking what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander, that republicans are conservatives are being targeted by this ju

we'll hear from harvard law professor emeritus,al dershowitz. and the american identity, why more in the u.s. are starting to swing to the right. it's making a buzz this morning, in the face of all of this out of the doj. don't miss it. you're watching "mornings with maria" live on fox business. we'll be right back. ♪ i want to play where you play with the angels. ♪ i want to wake up with you all entangled your dedicated fidelity advisor can help you open those doors. they can help you create a retirement-income plan designed to balance growth and guaranteed income. and provide access to specialists who help with estate planning to look out for future generations so you're not just growing and protecting your wealth. you're sharing it. because doors were meant to be opened. great job, everybody! (man) what if my type 2 diabetes takes over? (woman) what if all i do isn't enough? or what if i can do diabetes differently? (avo) now you can with once-weekly mounjaro. mounjaro helps your body regulate blood sugar, and mounjaro can help decrease how m

this is alan dershowitz wrote an opinion editorial in the wall street journal sea ago strong indictmentind of bipartisan support that forced nixon to resign. no such support is currently apparent since many republicans seem to be troubled by the targeting plaintiff trump. mr. smith, the special prosecutor, will have to convince not only a miami jury but the american public on both sides of the partisan divide. let's bring in our panel morgan ortagus spokesperson jeff mason reuters and ben domenech editor-at-large for the spectator, host of ben domenech podcast on fox news radio. ben, has been interesting since the digestion if you will of the federal indictment and the fallout from it, the former president has said a few things republicanly you heard his attorney general speak out on "fox news sunday." the political candidates running against the former president have in some ways evolved some of them in their messaging as the days have gone on. how do you see it. >> well, i think that this is a case that should not have been brought, in the first place. i don't think that it is justifi

but legal scholars including alan dershowitz say the doj better have a strong case. >> look, this indictment is as weak as it appears to be from what has been disclosed so far, it may be the most dangerous indictment in political history. >> reporter: you know, donald trump is expected to appear in a miami federal courtroom tuesday afternoon. it's federal court, no -- the doors will be closed, no cameras. and, neil, it's unlikely this case will be resolved anytime before the general election. and as we've seen in the past, indictments and charges like this have done nothing else but so lid arefy donald trump's base, so it'll be interesting to see how all of this affects his lead, which he has a substantial lead in the gop primary. neil, back to you. neil: ashley, do you know whether jim trusty had a heads up? he was talking to the media this morning that that he was going to be dumped by afternoon? >> reporter: i know. i don't think he did. that's a very good question. will we ever know, but having watched him on the morning shows, it didn't appear to me that he was on his way out. and if he

. >> alan dershowitz even over the weekend. >> and a trump-appointed judge. >> so the whole world isn'ttacked against him. it's about his actions. >> stay with us. there is a lot are more to get into. as the former president prepares to surrender in miami we will speak to one of his staunchest supporters on capitol hill, byron donald of florida. >>> pete buttigieg is set to visit the site of that fiery truck crash that made part of i-95 collapse in philadelphia. we will have the latest details on that ahead. stay with us. for people who are a little intense about hydration. neutrogena® hydro boost lightweight. clically proven. 48-hour hydration. for people with skin. . (wheezing) asthma isn't pretty. it's the moment when you realize that a good day... is about to become a bad one. but then, i remembered that the world is so much bigger than that, with trelegy. because one dose a day helps keep my asthma symptoms under control. and with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler, trelegy helps improve lung function so i can breathe easier for a full 24 hours. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sud

simpson i have had some of the world's greatest lawyers and johnnie cochran and alan dershowitz, thisthe advice that i would give to donald trump that i got from my lawyers. don't talk about the case publicly. don't do interviews about the case. he said, quote: i don't know if donald's lawyers are stressing this to him. if not, they should be fired and he should sue them. so o.j. simpson saying donald trump has got to stop talking about the case because he will dig a hole for himself. >> ainsley: joe concha on "fox & friends first" made a gotd. good point so obvious it dawned on me. >> ainsley: other countries we see political opponents get thrown in prisoner because of something they have done in the past or just as a way of corrupt government a bee manna government. we have seen that in v ns and caracas. that is what is hang here, it seems. >> andy mccarthy said if half of this is true he is in real trouble. he also said jim jordan should demand as oversight committee an update on what is hang with joe biden. you can't sit there jack smith come out and say no one above the law equal

and, in fact, i have to tell you, dershowitz and a couple very good guys wrote an article today, the know the tobacco king, he did great job on the tobacco companies. they wrote an article today that this is a disgrace that they're even looking at this stuff. there was nothing done wrong, nothing whatsoever. now look at the boxes with biden where they're in his garage, all over the floor, sitting under his corvette with the grease and everything else on a garage door you could cut with a scissor and no secret service. i have secret service all over the place. mar-a-lago is a fort. literally. she built that as a southern white house. but when you look at it, and it's another -- it's a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time. it's a hoax. and it has to do [cheers and applause] >> pres. trump: it has to do, more than anything else, with trying to interfere with the election. and, let me tell you, doj actually took -- you tack about bragg, the da of new york, never thought i would be dealing with a guy like this. you talk about bragg. the doj in washington put his top guy int

alan dershowitz is an eminent american lawyer who defended donald trump in his first senate impeachmentis tape—recording is a huge problem for the legal team. it is a ni . htmare problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for— problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a _ problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a defence _ problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a defence lawyer i problem for the legal team. it is a l nightmare for a defence lawyer and the dream of a prosecutor to have his own words, the defence would be a difficult one, he would have to argue i'm donald trump, i'm pompous and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i wasjust and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i was just waving and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i wasjust waving papers and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i was just waving papers to show how important i am. with the jury show how important i am. with the jury believe that? i would not make that argument unless i believed it was true. i would have to see what the evidence looked like so i think that particu

senas senator ted cruz, senator , one of the brightest, best debaters, according to alan dershowitz at harvard law. you're watching this case. s, a your observations, am i right?au about a dual justice system?la is this equal justice under app the law? tion oor equal application of? our laws? >> sean ?book you're absolutely right. as you know, the last bookupt. i wrote is entitled justice corrupted how the left has weaponized the legal system. and sadly, we're seeing it come to life in technicolor. the book justice corrupted talks about how the obama justice department and the fbi e and the irs were turned into political weapons to targetrner their enemies. you just talked about loist wa. lerner. that was part of that. it parthen talks about how those career, those those vicious partizans burrowed into senior career positions in waged war the agencies and the deep state agr against donalded t trump during the four years trump was president . ev tried to dock i everything they could to destroy his presidency. now, those partizans are back in the open. they are brazen.e they are runningd

it that's why alan dershowitz sayss you were one of the best debater students he's ever had in his harvard law class. buer had it in all seriousness o they have done everything evty can do to obstrucne james comey's investigation into the biden family. familythis is a this is a witned that the fbi paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to in the past for intel. they'v e had this now for years. why have they sat on it? >> well, i believe because they're covering up. look , the fbi at that hearing dir yesterday, that deputy director i askedectoi aske dired they have did the 1023 allege ag that biden had received a personal bribe of $5 million? he refused to answer. i asked him, well, will the fbdh give the 1023 to the senate judiciary committee? he refusediciary to answer. i asked him, is it accurate that there are 17 voice recording of this burisma official 15 talking to hunter biden. two talking to joe biden. he refusedo he. answer i asked him, does the fbi have those 17 voiceto a recordings? he refused to answer. i askenswer.i asked him, will ti give to the senate judiciary committee those

higthey seem to have, as alan dershowitz, as always, said, they'd get trump mentality. and but there are going to be challenges. now, there's something interesting inp ment the targetedrget notification, the law that they're citing for the classified documents in section seven nine three. it's a law that doesn't require you tot do prove that something is classified, just that it would have affected the national defense d iveinformation. that's going to give the president's lawyers a lot of latitude to argue, well, maybe that's notpresiden nationo defense information. and what if this information was leaked by someonion anwhaten before the president referenced it? i think there's a lot of challenges tha ret the trump teamin sees in the prosecution. and quite frankly, i've talked to government lawyer s. cas they have some concerns about how this case ends up. all right, john,e ends up. solk you for keeping us updated with quickly right now. >> te it the breaking report from boston .com tonight with morein damning evidence from joe against joe and hunter in a newly uncover

we're even hearing from some people, normally trump supporters, like allen dershowitz who -- now say wait a second, this indictment looks strong to me, alex. >> katie, trump avoided judge -- has been a sign of a case initially, of course, previously as you well know -- from former president. how are you expecting doj to handle that. can they challenge it, and can be their chances of winning? >> so, alex, aileen cannon who you just said, and noted, is a very familiar figure dealing with donald trump at the mar-a-lago case. she was randomly selected, i know there's some people out there that thinks it's not possible, she was randomly selected, and a lottery system to be able to hear this case. the doj has a very interesting proposition in front of it. do they immediately straight out of the gate, move to recuse or,'s saying that she has a preelection or predisposition to role in donald trump's favor when it comes to particular issues, or do they wait for some major decision -- indicating that that's where she's leaning. there are options available to the department of justice but previ

i talked to alan dershowitz tonight. he said if if thishe court this was done inlled the court of law o, the lawyers would be in extreme danger. investigd on congress to investigate this. he said the american public bett much better fromhings congress than a fake piece of evidence. >> well, we knew thing gos were going to go amiss when they hired a tv producer to produce right there hearings . then they were? prime time events. but who's watching? right, john ? >> we'llheck ioothank you so mu we'll check in with you on the house oversight committee was gearinag up c to interview a major witness in the biden family corruption probe last month when suddenlysa the informant disappeared. day? where is tha t informant today? where are these whistlewhis blowers? well, unfortunately, we can't trac k down the informant. we're hopeful that the informant is still there. i knowotoing you got stuff goini you're trying to find,or you know, the fake informantmanw that now he's gone missing. tha. >> i know you're busyso with that. well

big show tonight, tomi lahren, jimmy fallonbi clay, travis,, cy andre jarret, alan dershowitz, and aspecia, gregl report on the ocean gate submarine tragically implodert on thd in the north atlantic, killing all five passengers aboard. also tonight, congresswoman lauren boebert will join us. >> shelart wil today introduceda articles of impeachment against joe biden. rticle

dershowitz and his told us how wrong thatha was.ve an indictment of a formerta president who's winning in every single pole by hisdu opponents justice department. in between those two events with the mueller investigation, we had impeachment. we had 51 former intel officials falsely tell us the biden laptop was russia disinformation. we had a raid on president trump's home and of course and got alvin's ridiculous case in newfa york. seven years, nothing has changed. don't believe me? we interviewed steven former head of the washington field office in the trump class in a document case began. he told the committee, interviewed just two weeks ago two weekste ago today he told te committee that when he asked the department of justice why aew certain note u.s. attorney assigned to the trump classified document case? headquarters said because we are running it. he suggested the mammy field office to the rate sent in the washington from the washington field office to mimic about the miami field office do it headquarters said no he suggest

and in fact, i have to tell you , dershowitz, and a couple of very good guys wrote anday, e article today, the tobacco king. you know t who the tobacco kinoi did a great job in the tobaccoce companies. they wrote an article toda yat that this is a disgrace, thatff they're even looking at thiss nh stuff. >> there was nothingin donee boh wrong, nothing whatsoever. now, look at the boxes h with biden, whether in hishe garage. they're all over the floor. they're sitting under hir s wit corvette with the grease and everything else on a garagea door that you could cut with a scissor and no secret service.lr liteve secret service all over the place. >> mar-a-lago is a fort.y. a it's literally, you know, sheus. built that as a southern white , house. but when you look at and it and it's another it's of al a continuation of the greatest an witch hunt of all time. >> it's a hoax. and it has to do it has to do more than anything else. an to interfered, with the election and let meout tell you , doj actually took you talk about bragg, the d.a. of york, new york .like i never thought i'd be dealing wi

harvard law professor law alan dershowitz. and professor, i mean, n ders you know, if thihos is true, ins other words, that thiscoming indictment is coming, i'm going to bet every dollar that i havee that this is notnt going to be n indictment about classified materialterial. because the imme comparisons will be about hillary clinton and the july 2016 press conference ofs d he jim comey. and he said no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute and she did have top secret classified information. we have no doubt classifie joe a it of four separate locations, as i recall, so they would make that comparison. so it seems to m ie that that won't be about classified ofcuments, which means that in e the process of investigatingn this, some process crime probably came upd they in theirt and they went forwardhe with that. that's my guess. you're a legal professor. >> i'm not. you're a great guesser. eight plus in my book, back leave that that they would not go after themthe on the possession classified material, but they would try to conco

i will go with alan dershowitz saying this does not meet the conviction criteria.feels it is a very weak case. i am going to use the word vendetta by the democratic party, and it has twisted -- this whole thing was a law created to go after trump individually because he has been president and has access to everything, and to take that away from him and make it a crime is just pure politics. it is disgusting to see our system twisted like this. thank you for your information. i will not agree with all of it, but it certainly gives us a better outlook. c-span, thank you very much. host: tom in los angeles. mr. weinstein. guest: tom, look, we are all part of the system. that is what is the beauty of our system and country. we are entitled to have opposing viewpoints, and we are entitled to disagree about what the law is in the application of the law, and that is why we have judges. that is why they review the facts, they compare what is on the books, read the statutes and look at the intent behind them when they are drafted by the legislature, and we can agree to disa

, during the stormy dershowitz, during the stormy daniels indictment, he said that it was politically. yet it toes— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel like there are ruies— yet. it does feel like there are ruies tor— yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain _ yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain people that otters— rules for certain people that otters tom-t— rules for certain people that others don't have to follow. in this— others don't have to follow. in this particular— others don't have to follow. in this particular case are mr trump-s— this particular case are mr trump's supporters angry about this e — trump's supporters angry about this e res.— trump's supporters angry about this ? yes, absolutely- trump's supporters angry about this ? “55 .5-g j5rr: this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said,— this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said, they- this? “55 .5-g j5rr: and like you said, they truly teei— and like you said, they truly teei iite — and like you said, they truly feel like it

, during the stormy dershowitz, during the stormy daniels indictment, he said that it was politicallyhat incident. yet it toes— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel like there are ruies— yet. it does feel like there are ruies tor— yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain _ yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain people that otters— rules for certain people that otters tom-t— rules for certain people that others don't have to follow. in this— others don't have to follow. in this particular— others don't have to follow. in this particular case are mr trump-s— this particular case are mr trump's supporters angry about this e — trump's supporters angry about this e res.— trump's supporters angry about this ? yes, absolutely- trump's supporters angry about this ? “55 .5-g j5rr: this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said,— this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said, they- this? “55 .5-g j5rr: and like you said, they truly teei— and like you said, they truly teei iite — and like you said, they truly

dershowitz released the final report last month his findings.u can watch the house in judiciary hearing tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern on cspan2 or freight mobile video app or online on c-span.org. >> sees fit as your unfiltered view of government. funded by these television companies and more including buckeye broadband. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ thank broadband support c-span as a public service along with these other television providers. giving you a front row seat to democracy. next the justice department former special counsel jon durham testifies before the house judiciary committee on his investigation of the fbi probe into alleged connections between the 2016 trump president campaign and russian operatives. mr. durham's testimony follows the release of his final report should categorize the basis for the investigation as quote seriously flawed. [background noises]