the reason it is important as it is the place where the intelligence chiefs, from mi5, mi6 and gchq comee them their frank advice. within this kind of inner sanctum. it is likely holy of holies. it is like a faraday box where nothing gets in or out. that is why it is so serious. they give secret intelligence, they pass on a secret intelligence, they pass on a secret intelligence which, in some cases could have been obtained at great risk by agents overseas, or electronic interception by gchq. secure any knowledge that it is never going to get out of there. u nless we never going to get out of there. unless we get appeared on the daily on wednesday morning. they leak investigation began on friday. it has taken a team of 60 to come up with the results, which have been passed to the pi minister —— prime minister went like we do not know what they were doing as they went about it, but how many people with they have had to speak to. no i don't know exactly was, but any people who are at it were not named —— the intelligence figures were not named. the cabinet, some of the cabinet ministers we

so, according to gchq, the threat of spying that we've heard so much about recently is overblown. they take very seriously. in a future where our entire infrastructure, our economy and our lives are run by computers talking to each other over a 5g network, what would happen if someone shut that network down? if you think about it, the future of warfare is not necessarily going to be using traditional armies in the way that we think of, like with the second world war. the future of welfare is most likely going to be cyber, so without firing a shot, you could take a country out. it's feared that the chinese state could order huawei to build secret backdoors in a 5g network. these would leave the country vulnerable to a nationwide cyber attack. and that could be catastrophic. what we are about to show you is what experts have told us could happen if the uk's 5g network was attacked in the not—too—distant future. i don't know, the station's been shut for nearly an hour. there is no information, there are no buses. it's a nightmare! inaudible. tell me where the trouble is? m11 has comp

here in britain, gchq, one of the national spy britain, gchq, one of the national spy agencies, has warnedyber espionage by china. little wonder then that some like former defence secretary gavin williamson, have raised concerns about a company allegedly too close to chinese state security. today in westminster a major report came out arguing against using huawei. huawei have made a series of claims this week that they don't spy for china, that they are not a high—risk offender and there is no record of poor behaviour, that they are a proud company. what's new in our report is that we show these claims are essentially dubious at best, and inaccurate at worst. for many, that won't be a problem. huawei is a popular global brand and is competitively priced. but can it be trusted? we need to be able to trust in cyber security, whoever it is that provides your network, builds your kit. huawei is an open question right now, because it is compelled by china's security law to work with china's security agencies, that is a risk. a view in britain's intelligence and community, including mi6, is that

according to gchq, the threat of spying with her so much about recent is overblown.ously. in a future where our entire infrastructure, our economy and our lives are run by computers talking to each other over a5g computers talking to each other over a 5g network, what would happen if someone shot that that for down? a 5g network, what would happen if someone shot that that for down7m you think about it, the future of wa rfa re you think about it, the future of warfare is not necessarily going to be using traditional armies in the way that we think of luck with the second world war, the future of welfare is most likely going to be cyber so without firing a shot, you could take a country out. it is feared that the chinese state could order huawei to build secret backdoors in a 5g network. this would leave the culturally vulnerable to a nationwide cyber attack. and that could be catastrophic. what we are about to show you is what experts have told us show you is what experts have told us could happen if the u.k.'s 5g network was attacked in the not—too—distant network w

here in britain, gchq, one of the national spy britain, gchq, one of the national spy agencies, has warnedy china. little wonder, then, that some, like the former defence secretary gavin williamson, have raised concerns about a company allegedly too close to chinese state security. today in westminster, a major report came out arguing against using huawei stop huawei have made a series of claims this week. they don't spy for china, that they are not a high risk of doing so, that there is no record of poor behaviour, that they are a private company. and what's new in our report is that we show that these claims are essentially dubious at best and inaccurate at worst. for many, that won't be a problem. huawei is a popular global brand, and it is competitively priced. but can it be trusted? you need to be able to trust in cyber security whoever it is that is going to be providing your network, and building your kit. huawei right now is an open question. because it is compelled by china's cyber security lawyer to work with chinese cyber security agencies, that is a risk. the view of britain's

we have support from every political party, support from the army, support from gchq, support from barclaysve done around every campaign. but i'm also aware that every campaign, there has been division. i remember campaigning for the human fertilisation and embryology act and there was opposition from within our own communities. the difference is, these are more and more complex issues. it was quite easy to say gay people like to marry gay people, let us marry, on a postcard. arguing for trans rights is a much more complex, nuanced position. there are grey areas. prisons aren't simple, sport isn't simple, refuges aren't simple. gay rights for gays was a slightly easier narrative. but there is another charge, though, that the reason that stonewall was set up initially was to do with what was being taught in our schools and we have a situation at the moment in the united kingdom where in a predominantly muslim area, there are a number of schools who because of a row with the parents are not teaching, and it's primary school children, but they are not being taught about same—sex relationships

on american soil, its own citizens, but if they are lured overseas, they could get the mi6, mi5,he gchq to do their dirty work for them against the trump campaign. >> sean: how does james comey with a straight face say, oh, we don't spy in the fbi? by the way, i believe that about the 99% of fbi special agents, thank god that the premier law enforcement agency in the world remains that today, but he signed the first fisa warrant. was that not spying on carter page and the trump campaign? >> when you are in the government it feels like surveillance, when it happens to you, it feels like you got spied on. i the truth is both, if you are in the government, you call it legitimate surveillance, if you're the victim, you got spied on. the plain english is that the spied on is correct, but the principal why this is worth fighting over is to figure out how it started. and gregg is on to it. i was there after september 11th. i am aware of the tremendous powers that the government has and should have to read our emails, follow us on the street corner, go into a bar, i'm cool with that. if it is a

obtained via secret ways, pulling people‘s phone records, tapping phones perhaps, tapping into messages, gchq see a change in the weatherfrom the north, cold will start to see a change in the weather from the north, cold front moving across northern scotland, crossing us all over the bank holiday weekend, turning much colder. to give us an example, yesterday, temperature was 18, and today he will be lucky to see eight. in the highlands. a lot of dry weather and sunshine around, showers in the north, in the west, and some in the north, in the west, and some in the east. as temperatures rise through the day, further showers will develop. we could see one almost anywhere, but showers, so not all of us will catch one. channel islands and southern england, a combination of blustery showers and sunny skies and the wales and the midlands and east anglia, northern england, northern ireland, a similar story, sunshine and blustery heavy showers with the risk of thunder. the weather front is a cold front crossing scotland bringing in showery outbreaks of rain. behind it, note the temperatures. seven. th

when you're sitting in the cabinet room with the chief of the defence staff, the head of m16, m15, gchqpolice investigation. let's face it, if gavin williamson is professing his innocence, let him call for a referral and prove his innocence. you say or whoever, you share the data out there that the prime minister has got the right man? we can't be sure, can we? i am simply saying that if gavin williamson was innocent he should refer himself and asked the police to investigate. the government, if there is any doubt, are to be asking for the police to investigate because that they have got the wrong person, somebody who has breached national security is still in the national security council, and i think the public would find that outrageous. this is a cabinet and government at war with itself. that means the management of national security is frankly under question. what liberal democrats are saying, given this government is in such disarray, we have to have the police involved to get to the bottom of this. in this world of realpolitik, where journalists and politicians, they all have ea

our intelligence service, you think of gchq, best in the world, there are those who say whatever highwayw what they're up to, we have the same sort of... oh, you are looking very... and giving you the narrowed eyes. i don't thing it is quite as simple as that. there have been numerous reports in the last two or three yea rs of reports in the last two or three years of chinese cyber hacking, of government departments, of notjust spy government departments, of notjust spy stuff but ordinary everyday business of government, the russians have been up to it as well, and of penetration of companies by chinese hackers. and there is a realfear that if chinese technology is used in sensitive areas that if there is a spat, a diplomatic spat with china, for example over the size of china's c, over rite of passage, that state security could interfere or listening or in the worst case simply close it down. when you narrow you our eyes when i ask a question i know i'm in trouble! you're watching afternoon live — these are our headlines: dramatic evidence from a nurse at the inquests into the london br